Postmastectomy radiotherapy in breast reconstruction: Current controversies and trends.

Breast cancer is the most common cancer among women worldwide. Postmastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) is an essential component of combined therapy for early-stage, high-risk breast cancer. Breast reconstruction (BR) is often considered for patients with breast cancer who have undergone mastectomy. There has been a considerable amount of discussion about the optimal approach to combining PMRT with BR in the treatment of breast cancer. PMRT may increase the risk of complications and prevent good aesthetic results after BR, while BR may increase the complexity of PMRT and the radiation dose to surrounding normal tissues. The purpose of this review is to give a broad overview and summary of the current controversies and trends in PMRT and BR in the context of the most recent literature available.

Is there any radiation-induced brachial plexopathy after hypofractionated postmastectomy radiotherapy with helical tomotherapy?

Introduction: Radiation-induced brachial plexopathy (RIBP) is one of the most concerning late radiation effects after hypofractionated postmastectomy radiotherapy (HF-PMRT) to the chest wall and regional lymph nodes. The purpose of this study was to investigate the RIBP events occurring in breast cancer patients after HF-PMRT using intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) by helical tomotherapy. Furthermore, the dosimetric parameters of the ipsilateral brachial plexus were reported. Materials and methods: Breast cancer patients who underwent HF-PMRT using the IMRT via HT at our institute were included. In the first cohort, subjective RIBP symptoms were measured using a QuickDASH questionnaire, whereas objective RIBP events were assessed using a comprehensive physical evaluation in the second cohort. The ipsilateral brachial plexus from all eligible patients' treatment plans was contoured, and the dosimetric parameters were explored. Results: From March 2014 to December 2022, 229 patients were enrolled; 107 and 72 individuals were in the first and second cohorts, respectively. The first cohort's median follow-up period was 27 months, and the second cohort was 31 months. In the first cohort, 80 patients (74.77%) had a normal function, 21 (19.63%) had a mild grade, and 6 (5.61%) had a moderate grade; no severe or very severe RIBP was observed. However, the comprehensive physical evaluation of the second cohort indicated no RIBP events. Dosimetric analysis revealed that the median maximum dose was 44.52, 44.52, and 44.60 Gy; the median mean dose was 33.00, 32.23, and 32.33 Gy; and the median dose at 0.03 cc was 44.33, 44.36, and 44.39 Gy for all patients, patients in the first and second cohort, respectively. Each dosimetric parameter was evaluated, and no statistically significant differences were detected. Conclusion: The absence of RIBP events supports the safety of employing HF-PMRT by HT for the chest wall and all regional lymph nodes. We propose that applying the ICRU Report 83 criteria for IMRT planning, which limit the maximum dose (107% of the prescribed dose) to less than 2% of the planning target volume and exclude the brachial plexus region from the maximal dose area, is a practical way to minimize the risk of RIBP from HF-PMRT.

Is postmastectomy radiotherapy necessary for breast cancer patients with clinically node-positive downstaging to ypN0 after neoadjuvant chemotherapy?

PURPOSE: The significance of postmastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) in breast cancer patients who initially have clinically node-positive (cN +) status but achieve downstaging to ypN0 following neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) remains uncertain. This study aims to assess the impact of PMRT in this patient subset. METHODS: Patients were enrolled from West China Hospital, Sichuan University from 2008 to 2019. Overall survival (OS), Locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and assessed with the log-rank test. The impact of PMRT was further analyzed by the Cox proportional hazards model. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to reduce the selection bias. RESULTS: Of the 333 eligible patients, 189 (56.8%) received PMRT, and 144 (43.2%) did not. At a median follow-up period of 71 months, the five-year LRFS, DMFS, BCSS, and OS rates were 99.1%, 93.4%, 96.4%, and 94.3% for the entire cohort, respectively. Additionally, the 5-year LRFS, DMFS, BCSS, and OS rates were 98.9%, 93.8%, 96.7%, and 94.5% with PMRT and 99.2%, 91.3%, 94.9%, and 92.0% without PMRT, respectively (all p-values not statistically significant). After multivariate analysis, PMRT was not a significant risk factor for any of the endpoints. When further stratified by stage, PMRT did not show any survival benefit for patients with stage II-III diseases. CONCLUSION: In the context of comprehensive treatments, PMRT might be exempted in ypN0 breast cancer patients. Further large-scale, randomized controlled studies are required to investigate the significance of PMRT in this patient subset.

Analysis of Individualized Silicone Rubber Bolus Using Fan Beam Computed Tomography in Postmastectomy Radiotherapy: A Dosimetric Evaluation and Skin Acute Radiation Dermatitis Survey.

Objective: To investigate the dosimetric effects of using individualized silicone rubber (SR) bolus on the target area and organs at risk (OARs) during postmastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT), as well as evaluate skin acute radiation dermatitis (ARD). Methods: A retrospective study was performed on 30 patients with breast cancer. Each patient was prepared with an individualized SR bolus of 3 mm thickness. Fan-beam computed tomography (FBCT) was performed at the first and second fractions, and then once a week for a total of 5 times. Dosimetric metrics such as homogeneity index (HI), conformity index (CI), skin dose (SD), and OARs including the heart, lungs, and spinal cord were compared between the original plan and the FBCTs. The acute side effects were recorded. Results: In targets' dosimetric metrics, there were no significant differences in Dmean and V105% between planning computed tomography (CT) and actual treatments (P > .05), while the differences in D95%, V95%, HI, and CI were statistically significant (P < .05). In OARs, there were no significant differences between the Dmean, V5, and V20 of the affected lung, V5 of the heart and Dmax of the spinal cord (P > .05) except the V30 of affected lung, which was slightly lower than the planning CT (P < .05). In SD, both Dmax and Dmean in actual treatments were increased than plan A, and the difference was statistically significant (P < .05), while the skin-V20 and skin-V30 has no difference. Among the 30 patients, only one patient had no skin ARD, and 5 patients developed ARD of grade 2, while the remaining 24 patients were grade 1. Conclusion: The OR bolus showed good anastomoses and high interfraction reproducibility with the chest wall, and did not cause deformation during irradiation. It ensured accurate dose delivery of the target and OARs during the treatment, which may increase SD by over 101%. In this study, no cases of grade 3 skin ARD were observed. However, the potential of using OR bolus to reduce grade 1 and 2 skin ARD warrants further investigation with a larger sample size.

Outcomes with and without postmastectomy radiotherapy for pT3N0-1M0 breast cancer: An institutional experience.

AIM: The objective of this study is to comprehensively evaluate the therapeutic efficacy of postmastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) in treating patients with pT3N0-1M0 breast cancer within the context of modern therapeutic strategies. METHODS: Clinical data from patients with pT3N0-1M0 breast cancer who underwent mastectomy from January 2005 to December 2018 at our institution were retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS: The study involved a total of 222 participants, with 112 individuals undergoing PMRT and 110 individuals not receiving it. The median follow-up duration was 77 months (range: 6-171 months). The entire cohort demonstrated 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) rates of 85.1% and 91.0%, respectively, along with a locoregional recurrence (LRR) rate as low as 7.2%. The PMRT group showed significantly better 5-year DFS (90.2% vs. 80.0%, p = 0.02) and OS (95.5% vs. 86.4%, p = 0.012) rates, as well as a lower LRR rate (4.5% vs. 10.0%, p = 0.122), compared to the group without PMRT. Cox regression analysis confirmed the independent prognostic significance of PMRT for both DFS (p = 0.040) and OS (p = 0.047). Following propensity score matching (PSM), the analysis included 100 matched patients, revealing an improved prognosis for those who received PMRT (DFS: p = 0.067; OS: p = 0.043). CONCLUSIONS: Our study reveals favorable prognoses for pT3N0-1M0 breast cancer patients treated within contemporary therapeutic approaches. The pivotal role of PMRT in this context is evident. However, due to the retrospective design of our study and the relatively limited sample size, further investigation is imperative to validate and enhance these initial findings.

Individualized 3D-printed bolus promotes precise postmastectomy radiotherapy in patients receiving breast reconstruction.

Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of 3D-printed tissue compensations in breast cancer patients receiving breast reconstruction and postmastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT). Methods and materials: We enrolled patients with breast cancer receiving breast reconstruction and PMRT. The dose distribution of target and skin, conformability, and dose limit of organs at risk (OARs) were collected to evaluate the efficacy of the 3D-printed bolus. Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) radiation injury classification was used to evaluated the skin toxicities. Results: A total of 30 patients diagnosed between October 2019 to July 2021 were included for analysis. Among all the patients, the 3D-printed bolus could ensure the dose coverage of planning target volume (PTV) [homogeneity index (HI) 0.12 (range: 0.08-0.18)], and the mean doses of D99%, D98%, D95%, D50%, D2% and Dmean were 4606.29cGy, 4797.04cGy, 4943.32cGy, 5216.07cGy, 5236.10cGy, 5440.28cGy and 5462.10cGy, respectively. The bolus demonstrated an excellent conformability, and the mean air gaps between the bolus and the chest wall in five quadrants were 0.04cm, 0.18cm, 0.04cm, 0.04cm and 0.07cm, respectively. In addition, the bolus had acceptable dosage limit of OARs [ipsilateral lung: Dmean 1198.68 cGy, V5 46.10%, V20 21.66%, V30 16.31%); heart: Dmean 395.40 cGy, V30 1.02%, V40 0.22%; spinal cord planning risk volume (PRV): Dmax 1634 cGy] and skin toxicity (grade 1, 76.0%; grade 2, 21.0%; grade 3, 3.3%). Conclusion: The 3D-printed bolus offers advantages in terms of dose uniformity and controllable skin toxicities in patients receiving breast reconstruction and PMRT. Further research is needed to comprehensively evaluate the effectiveness of the 3Dprinted bolus in this patient subset.

Dosimetric Comparison of Postmastectomy Radiotherapy Plans for Synchronous Bilateral Breast Cancer, Including Regional Lymph Node Irradiation.

BACKGROUND: To investigate the optimal radiotherapy plans for synchronous bilateral breast cancer (SBBC) patients receiving postmastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT), including regional lymph node irradiation (RNI). METHODS: For 10 SBBC patients who underwent bilateral mastectomy and received bilateral PMRT with RNI, 3 integrally optimized plans with a single isocenter were designed for each patient in this retrospective study: intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) with 9 fixed beams (9F-IMRT), volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) with 2 pairs of half arcs (2F-VMAT), VMAT with 2 pairs of outer tangential arcs and 1 pair of 200-degree arcs (3F-VMAT). The paired t-test (in the case of normal variables) and Friedman's test (in the case of nonnormal variables) were applied to compare the planning target volumes (PTVs) and organs at risk (OARs) values of the 3 techniques. RESULTS: The 3 techniques provided adequate target dose coverage and comparable results for PTVs. For OARs, 3F-VMAT yielded the lowest mean or median values of the left lung (15.02 ± 1.57 Gy) and right lung (14.91 ± 1.14 Gy), heart (6.19 (1.96) Gy), coronary artery (15.96 ± 5.76 Gy) and liver (8.10 ± 2.70 Gy) which were significantly different from those of 9F-IMRT and 2F-VMAT. The percentages of volume at various doses (V5, V10, V20, and V30) of 3F-VMAT plans were also lower than or comparable with those of 9F-IMRT and 2F-VMAT. The monitor units (MUs) of 3F-VMAT were 31% higher than those of 9F-IMRT and comparable with those of 2F-VMAT; however, there were time savings and halved beam-on times (BOTs) compared to 9F-IMRT. CONCLUSIONS: The 3F-VMAT plan yielded comparable target coverage compared with 9F-IMRT and 2F-VMAT, was superior in dose sparing of normal tissues and enabled shorter BOTs, improving treatment efficiency. In our research, 3F-VMAT was the optimal radiotherapy technique for SBBC patients receiving PMRT including RNI.

The trade-off of post-mastectomy radiotherapy usage for the breast cancer patients aged 70 years or older: a study based on SEER database.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to investigate the role of post-mastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) in the female aged 70 years or older diagnosed with breast cancer, which is still controversial. METHODS: This retrospective study enrolled female breast cancer women aged 70 + years following mastectomy from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to reduce covariable imbalance. A nomogram was created to predict the 1,3,5-years overall survival (OS) and divide patients into three risk groups. RESULTS: After matching, PMRT were associated with significant improvement in breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) and OS (p < 0.001). By contrast, the BCSS and OS benefit from PMRT were not significant in patients with T1N1 tumor (BCSS: HR = 0.716, p = 0.249;OS:HR = 0.908, p = 0.572), and T2N1 tumor (BCSS:HR = 0.866, p = 0.289;OS:HR = 0.879, p = 0.166). Stratified by subtype, the HR+/HER-2- subtype and the HR-/HER-2- subtype (all p < 0.001) have a significant prolonged survival, yet not significant BCSS difference are shown in the HER-2 + tumor. In the low-risk group as determined by the nomogram, the use of PMRT did not significantly improve OS (p = 0.203). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that PMRT improves the survival of females with elderly breast cancer, while for T1-2N1 breast cancer patients, the omission of PMRT could be considered. Furthermore, the nomogram we constructed could be used as a decision tool for the omission of PMRT in low-risk elderly patients.

Effect of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes depending on the presence of postmastectomy radiotherapy on the prognosis in pT1-2N1M0 breast cancer.

Background: Currently, it remains unclear regarding the association between tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) and the efficacy of postoperative radiotherapy in primary tumors. Here we attempted to investigate the effect of TILs depending on the presence of postmastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) on the prognosis in pT1-2N1M0 breast cancer. Methods: The clinical data of pT1-2N1M0 breast cancer patients undergoing mastectomy and axillary lymph node dissection were retrospectively analyzed. The effect of TILs on the prognosis was assessed based on the infiltration degree (low: TILs ≤10%, high: TILs >10%), and then the prognosis of patients with low and high infiltration of TILs was analyzed based on presence or absence of PMRT. Results: Totally 213 patients were eligible for the study, including 162 cases of low infiltration and 51 of high infiltration. High-infiltration patients tended to be ER/PR-negative, HER2-positive, and have high histological grade. The infiltration in triple-negative and HER2-positive subtypes was higher compared with Luminal A subtype. Regarding local-regional recurrence-free survival, recurrence-free survival, and overall survival (OS) rates, the differences were all inapparent whether in high- and low-infiltration patients or in high-infiltration patients with/without PMRT. Compared with those without PMRT, low-infiltration patients with PMRT showed a significantly increased OS rate (92.8% vs. 80.0%, p=0.023). Multivariate analysis further confirmed PMRT as an independent predicator of OS in low-infiltration patients (HR: 0.228, 95%CI: 0.081-0.644, p=0.005). Conclusion: High infiltration of TILs in pT1-2N1M0 breast cancer may be associated with clinicopathological factors. Low-infiltration patients, but not high-infiltration patients, may derive survival benefits from PMRT.

Optimal fractionation and timing of weekly cone-beam CT in daily surface-guided radiotherapy for breast cancer.

PURPOSE: Surface-guided radiotherapy (SGRT) has been demonstrated to be a promising supplement to cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) in adjuvant breast cancer radiotherapy, but a rational combination mode is lacking in clinical practice. The aim of this study was to explore this mode and investigate its impact on the setup and dose accuracy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Daily SGRT and weekly CBCT images were acquired for 23 patients with breast cancer who received conventional fractionated radiotherapy after lumpectomy. Sixteen modes were acquired by randomly selecting one (CBCT1), two (CBCTij), three (CBCTijk), four (CBCTijkl), and five (CBCT12345) images from the CBCT images for fusion with the SGRT. The CTV-PTV margins, OAR doses, and dose coverage (V95%) of PTV and CTV was calculated based on SGRT setup errors with different regions of interest (ROIs). Dose correlations between these modalities were investigated using Pearson and Spearman's methods. Patient-specific parameters were recorded to assess their impact on dose. RESULTS: The CTV-PTV margins decreased with increasing CBCT frequencies and were close to 5 mm for CBCTijkl and CBCT12345. For the ipsilateral breast ROI, SGRT errors were larger in the AP direction, and target doses were higher in all modes than in the whole breast ROI (P < 0.05). In the ipsilateral ROI, the target dose correlations between all modes increased with increasing CBCT time intervals, decreased, and then increased with increasing CBCT frequencies, with the inflection point being CBCT participation at week 5. The dose deviations in CBCT123, CBCT124, CBCT125, CBCTijkl, and CBCT12345 were minimal and did not differ significantly (P > 0.05). There was excellent agreement between CBCT124 and CBCT1234, and between (CBCTijkl, CBCT12345) and CBCT125 in determining the classification for the percentage of PTV deviation (Kappa = 0.704-0.901). In addition, there were weak correlations between the patient's Dips_b (ipsilateral breast diameter with bolus) and CTV doses in modes with CBCT participation at week 4 (R = 0.270 to 0.480). CONCLUSIONS: Based on weekly CBCT, these modes with ipsilateral ROI and a combination of daily SGRT and a CBCT frequency of ≥ 3 were recommended, and CBCT was required at weeks 1 and 2 for CBCTijk.

Effect of internal port on dose distribution in post-mastectomy radiotherapy for breast cancer patients after expander breast reconstruction.

Background: In patients with expander-based reconstruction a few dosimetric analyses detected radiation therapy dose perturbation due to the internal port of an expander, potentially leading to toxicity or loss of local control. This study aimed at adding data on this field. Materials and methods: A dosimetric analysis was conducted in 30 chest wall treatment planning without and with correction for port artifact. In plans with artifact correction density was overwritten as 1 g/cm3. Medium, minimum and maximum chest wall doses were compared in the two plans. Both plans, with and without correction, were compared on an anthropomorphic phantom with a tissue expander on the chest covered by a bolus simulating the skin. Ex vivo dosimetry was carried out on the phantom and in vivo dosimetry in three patients by using film strips during one treatment fraction. Estimated doses and measured film doses were compared. Results: No significant differences emerged in the minimum, medium and maximum doses in the two plans, without and with correction for port artifacts. Ex vivo and in vivo analyses showed a good correspondence between detected and calculated doses without and with correction. Conclusions: The port did not significantly affect dose distribution in patients who will receive post-mastectomy radiation therapy.

Postmastectomy radiotherapy in patients with T1-2N1 breast cancer: a single center experience and a meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: Postmastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) in patients with T1-2N1 breast cancer is still controversial. This study was to evaluate the survival prognosis of T1-2N1 patients with or without PMRT. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From January 2006 to May 2017, 2606 female breast cancer patients underwent mastectomy in our medical center, among whom 402 patients of T1-2N1 stage with or without PMRT were finally analyzed. The median follow-up duration was 59.5 months. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). The secondary endpoint was disease-free survival (DFS). RESULTS: In the study of our center, no statistically significant difference was observed between the T1-2N1 PMRT and non-PMRT subgroups for the 5-year OS (94.4% vs 95.4%, p = 0.667) and DFS (90.1% vs. 91.1%, p = 0.798). By the date of the last follow-up, 8.96% (n = 36) of the patients experienced any recurrence. Univariate analysis revealed that PMRT was not a prognostic factor for either OS (p = 0.667) or DFS (p = 0.798) in T1-2N1 patients. We then did a meta-analysis on the current treatment patterns, in which 2606 PMRT and 4281 non-PMRT T1-2N1 breast cancer patients with mastectomy were included. The meta-analysis showed that PMRT didn't improve the OS of the patients (HR = 0.85, p = 0.11), but patients with PMRT had better DFS than those in the non-PMRT group (HR = 0.62, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: PMRT did not affect the survival of T1-2N1 breast cancer patients who underwent mastectomy, suggesting that radiotherapy may be safely omitted for them.

Development and validation of nomograms for predicting survival outcomes in patients with T1-2N1 breast cancer to identify those who could not benefit from postmastectomy radiotherapy.

Purpose: In this study, we aimed to develop and validate nomograms for predicting the survival outcomes in patients with T1-2N1 breast cancer to identify the patients who could not benefit from postmastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT). Methods: Data from 10191 patients with T1-2N1 breast cancer were extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Of them, 6542 patients who had not received PMRT formed the training set. Concurrently, we retrospectively enrolled 419 patients from the Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College (NSMC), and 286 patients who did not undergo PMRT formed the external validation set. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) and multivariate Cox regression analyses were used for selecting prognostic factors in the training set. Using the selected factors, two prognostic nomograms were constructed. The nomograms' performance was assessed using the concordance index (C-index), calibration curves, decision curve analysis (DCA), and risk subgroup classification. The stabilized inverse probability of treatment weights (IPTWs) was used to balance the baseline characteristics of the different risk groups. Finally, the survival outcomes and effectiveness of PMRT after IPTW adjustment were evaluated using adjusted Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox regression models. Results: The 8-year overall survival (OS) and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) rates for the SEER cohort were 84.3% and 90.1%, with a median follow-up time of 76 months, while those for the NSMC cohort were 84.1% and 86.9%, with a median follow-up time of 73 months. Moreover, significant differences were observed in the survival curves for the different risk subgroups (P < 0.001) in both SEER and NSMC cohorts. The subgroup analysis after adjustment by IPTW revealed that PMRT was significantly associated with improved OS and BCSS in the intermediate- (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.72, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.59-0.88, P=0.001; HR = 0.77, 95% CI: 0.62-0.95, P = 0.015) and high- (HR=0.66, 95% CI: 0.52-0.83, P<0.001; HR=0.74, 95% CI: 0.56-0.99, P=0.039) risk groups. However, PMRT had no significant effects on patients in the low-risk groups. Conclusion: According to the prognostic nomogram, we performed risk subgroup classification and found that patients in the low-risk group did not benefit from PMRT.

The prognostic differences and the effect of postmastectomy radiotherapy between post-chemotherapy ypT1-2ypN1 and de novo pT1-2N1 breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: The prognosis and the value of postmastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) between post-chemotherapy ypT1-2ypN1 and de novo pT1-2N1 breast cancer (BC) remain controversial. We aimed to evaluate the prognostic differences and the effect of PMRT between the two patient subsets. METHODS: Patients diagnosed with pT1-2N1M0 BC were identified between 2010 and 2018. The study endpoints were overall survival (OS), breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS), locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) and disease-free survival (DFS). The chi-square test, Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression analysis were used for data analysis. RESULTS: Total number of 2103 pT1-2N1M0 BC patients were included in the study, including 270 post-chemotherapy (97 without PMRT, 173 with PMRT) and 1833 de novo cases (993 without PMRT, 840 with PMRT). No significant differences were found between post-chemotherapy ypT1-2ypN1 and de novo pT1-2N1 BC patients in 5-year OS (p = 0.068), BCSS (p = 0.054), LRFS (p = 0.241), DMFS (p = 0.104) or DFS (p = 0.08). PMRT did not improve any survival outcome in patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy; however, the PMRT group had a better 5-year BCSS (97.0% vs. 95.8%, p = 0.033) in de novo pT1-2N1 BC. Cox multivariate analysis demonstrated that PMRT was a significant independent predictor of BCSS (HR 0.628; 95% CI, 0.403-0.978; p = 0.04) in de novo pT1-2N1 patients. CONCLUSIONS: There seemed no survival difference in post-chemotherapy ypT1-2ypN1 and de novo pT1-2N1 BC patients with contemporary systemic therapy. In addition, PMRT might be exempted in patients with post-chemotherapy ypT1-2ypN1 BC, while not in patients with de novo pT1-2N1 BC.

Application of thermoplastic elastomer (TPE) bolus in postmastectomy radiotherapy.

PURPOSE: To assess the planned dose, in vivo dosimetry, acute skin toxicity, pain, and distress using Thermoplastic Elastomer (TPE) bolus for postmastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Thirty-two PMRT patients with TPE bolus (17 patients for 25 fractions, 15 patients for the first 20 fractions) were selected for the study. The acute skin toxicity, pain, and psychological distress were assessed from the first treatment week to the fourth week after the end of treatment. At the first treatment, the MOSFET was used in vivo dosimetry measurement. RESULTS: In vivo dosimetry with the bolus, the dose deviation ranged from -6.22% to -1.56% for 5 points. The presence of grade 1 and 2 skin toxicity reached its peak (70.0% and 13.3%) in the sixth week. Two patients (6.6%) with 25 fractions bolus experienced moist desquamation in the fifth and seventh week, with pain score 2 and 3, and interruptions of 3 and 5 days, respectively. The incidence of pain score 1, 2, and 3 peaked in the fifth (33.3%), fourth (33.3%), and seventh (10.0%) week. No patients experienced grade 3 skin toxicity and severe pain. One patient had significant anxiety, and two patients had significant depression. CONCLUSION: The TPE bolus can accurately fit skin and improve the surface dose to more than 90%. Twenty fractions with TPE bolus had similar skin toxicity and pain to those without bolus and did not increase patients' distress and clinical workload, compared with the literature's data, which is an alternative to the 3D printing bolus for PMRT.

The therapeutic effect of adipose-derived stem cells on soft tissue injury after radiotherapy and their value for breast reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: Postmastectomy radiotherapy is considered to be a necessary treatment in the therapy of breast cancer, while it will cause soft tissue damage and complications, which are closely related to the success rate and effectiveness of breast reconstruction. After radiotherapy, cutaneous tissue becomes thin and brittle, and its compliance decreases. Component fat grafting and adipose-derived stem cell therapy are considered to have great potential in treating radiation damage and improving skin compliance after radiotherapy. MAIN BODY: In this paper, the basic types and pathological mechanisms of skin and soft tissue damage to breast skin caused by radiation therapy are described. The 2015-2021 studies related to stem cell therapy in PubMed were also reviewed. Studies suggest that adipose-derived stem cells exert their biological effects mainly through cargoes carried in extracellular vesicles and soluble secreted factors. Compared to traditional fat graft breast reconstruction, ADSC therapy amplifies the effects of stem cells in it. In order to obtain a more purposeful therapeutic effect, proper stem cell pretreatment may achieve more ideal and safe results. CONCLUSION: Recent research works about ADSCs and other MSCs mainly focus on curative effects in the acute phase of radiation injury, and there is little research about treatment of chronic phase complications. The efficacy of stem cell therapy on alleviating skin fibrosis and its underlying mechanism require further research.

Optimal timing of postmastectomy radiotherapy in two-stage prosthetic breast reconstruction: An updated meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: There is no consensus on the timing of postmastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) in relation to the exchange procedure in breast cancer patients undergoing the immediate two-stage prosthetic breast reconstruction. This meta-analysis investigated the reconstruction failure, complications, and cosmesis between PMRT to the tissue expander (TE) and PMRT to the permanent implant (PI). METHODS: A literature search was conducted in PubMed and Embase databases until February 2022. Studies presenting at least one aspect relating to reconstruction failure, complications, and cosmesis between two cohorts were included. Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) was used to assess the risk of bias in included studies. RESULTS: Eleven studies presenting 1447 patients were enrolled. Three studies were prospective controlled research. The risk for implant loss was higher in PMRT to TE cohort (RR 1.75; 95% CI, 1.03 to 2.98; p = 0.04); meanwhile, the PMRT to TE cohort had a significantly lower risk of capsular contracture (RR 0.47; 95% CI, 0.29 to 0.78; p = 0.003). However, the synthesized result should be interpreted sensibly due to heterogeneity in statistical methods and definitions. CONCLUSION: Delivering PMRT to PI may reduce the risk of implant loss, while delivering PMRT to TE can reduce the risk of severe capsular contracture. More high-quality studies are warranted for the refinement of clinical practice.

Post-mastectomy adjuvant radiotherapy for direct-to-implant and two-stage implant-based breast reconstruction: A meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: In recent years, immediate replacement with a prosthesis (direct-to-implant, DTI) is gaining more popularity than two-staged methods (tissue expander followed by an implant, TEI). The safety of immediate implant-based breast reconstruction (IBR) is debatable when postmastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) is indicated. This meta-analysis aims to evaluate the outcomes of DTI and TEI procedures followed by PMRT. METHODS: Studies searched in the PubMed/Embase/The Cochrane Library databases (1995-2021) were filtered by exclusion criteria. Cases were divided into PMRT and non-irradiated groups, PMRT with a permanent implant or tissue expander. The outcomes were capsular contracture and other complications. RESULTS: A total of 22 studies with 6964 patients were included. PMRT increased the risk of capsular contracture in DTI patients and caused other complications in TEI patients. In PMRT and non-irradiated groups, the mean rates of capsular contracture were 17.01% versus 3.30% (p < 0.01) in IBR and 15.49% versus 5.70% (p < 0.01) in DTI. The mean rates of other complications were 22.59% versus 11.29% (p < 0.01) in IBR, 31.88% versus 27.87% (p = 0.35) in DTI, and 22.11% versus 9.90% (p < 0.01) in TEI. Implants and tissue expanders caused a similar rate of capsular contracture and other complications. CONCLUSION: PMRT is related to a higher risk of complication and capsular contracture in IBR, including DTI procedure. This negative effect may not be related to the type of breast contents during radiotherapy.

Postmastectomy Radiotherapy After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in cT1-2N+ Breast Cancer Patients: A Single Center Experience and Review of Current Literature.

Purpose: Postmastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in breast cancer patients with initial clinical stage cT1-2N+, especially for those who achieved ypT1-2N0, is still controversial. This study was to evaluate the survival prognosis of cT1-2N+ patients after NAC with or without PMRT, and to discuss the selection of patients who may omit PMRT. Patients and Methods: From January 2005 to December 2017, 3055 female breast cancer patients underwent mastectomy in our medical center, among whom 215 patients of cT1-2N+ stage, receiving NAC with or without PMRT were finally analyzed. The median follow-up duration was 72.6 months. The primary endpoint was disease-free survival (DFS), and secondary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Comparison was conducted between PMRT and non-PMRT subgroups. Results: Of the 215 eligible patients, 35.8% (77/215) cT1-2N+ patients achieved ypT0-2N0 after NAC while 64.2% (138/215) of the patients remained nodal positive (ypT0-2N+). The 5-year DFS of ypT0-2N0 non-PMRT was 79.5% (95% confidence interval [CI] 63.4-95.6%). No statistically significant difference was observed between the ypT0-2N0 PMRT and non-PMRT subgroups for the 5-year DFS (78.5% vs 79.5%, p = 0.673) and OS (88.8% vs 90.8%, p = 0.721). The 5-years DFS didn't obviously differ between the ypT0-2N0 non-PMRT subgroup and cT1-2N0 subgroup (79.5% vs 93.3%, p = 0.070). By using Cox regression model in multivariate analyses of prognosis in ypT0-2N+ PMRT subgroup, HER2 overexpression and triple-negative breast cancer were significantly poor predictors of DFS and OS, while ypN stage was significant independent predictors of OS. Conclusion: An effective response to NAC (ypT0-2N0) indicates a sufficiently favorable prognosis, and PMRT might be omitted for cT1-2N+ breast cancer patients with ypT0-2N0 after NAC.

Artificial Intelligence-Based Automated Treatment Planning of Postmastectomy Volumetric Modulated Arc Radiotherapy.

As a useful tool, artificial intelligence has surpassed human beings in many fields. Artificial intelligence-based automated radiotherapy planning strategies have been proposed in lots of cancer sites and are the future of treatment planning. Postmastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) decreases local recurrence probability and improves overall survival, and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) has gradually become the mainstream technique of radiotherapy. However, there are few customized effective automated treatment planning schemes for postmastectomy VMAT so far. This study investigated an artificial intelligence based automated planning using the MD Anderson Cancer Center AutoPlan (MDAP) system and Pinnacle treatment planning system (TPS), to effectively generate high-quality postmastectomy VMAT plans. In this study, 20 patients treated with PMRT were retrospectively investigated, including 10 left- and 10 right-sided postmastectomy patients. Chest wall and the supraclavicular, subclavicular, and internal mammary regions were delineated as target volume by radiation oncologists, and 50 Gy in 25 fractions was prescribed. Organs at risk including heart, spinal cord, left lung, right lung, and lungs were also contoured. All patients were planned with VMAT using 2 arcs. An optimization objective template was summarized based on the dose of clinical plans and requirements from oncologists. Several treatment planning parameters were investigated using an artificial intelligence algorithm, including collimation angle, jaw collimator mode, gantry spacing resolution (GSR), and number of start optimization times. The treatment planning parameters with the best performance or that were most preferred were applied to the automated treatment planning method. Dosimetric indexes of automated treatment plans (autoplans) and manual clinical plans were compared by the paired t-test. The jaw tracking mode, 2-degree GSR, and 3 rounds of optimization were selected in all the PMRT autoplans. Additionally, the 350- and 10-degree collimation angles were selected in the left- and right-sided PMRT autoplans, respectively. The uniformity index and conformity index of the planning target volume, mean heart dose, spinal cord D0.03cc, mean lung dose, and V5Gy and V20Gy of the lung of autoplans were significantly better compared with the manual clinical plans. An artificial intelligence-based automated treatment planning method for postmastectomy VMAT has been developed to ensure plan quality and improve clinical efficiency.