Comparison of remimazolam and midazolam for sedation during colonoscopy in Japanese patients: A propensity score matching analysis.

Objectives: To compare the efficacy and safety of sedation with midazolam and remimazolam for colorectal endoscopy. Methods: This single-center, two-arm, post-hoc analysis of the REM-IICTJP01 study investigated the efficacy and safety of remimazolam for gastrointestinal endoscopic sedation. We enrolled 40 and 208 patients who underwent colonoscopy under remimazolam and midazolam sedation, respectively, during the same period. The primary outcome was the time from the end of the colonoscopy until discharge. The secondary outcomes included the time from the end of the colonoscopy until awakening, dosage, and adverse events. Propensity score matching was employed to eliminate the effect of confounding factors. Results: Thirty-seven patients in each group were matched. After propensity matching, the time to awakening after colonoscopy was 28.0 (13.0-37.0) min in the midazolam group and 0 (0-0) min in the remimazolam group; moreover, the time till discharge was 40.0 (35.0-46.5) min in the midazolam group and 0 (0-5.0) min in the remimazolam group, both of which were significantly shorter in the remimazolam group (p < 0.01). The number of additional doses was 0 (0-0) and 2 (1-3) in the midazolam and remimazolam groups, respectively. The total dose was 2.0 (2.0-3.5) and 6.0 (5.0-7.0) mg in the midazolam and remimazolam groups, respectively. Conclusions: Remimazolam yielded significantly faster times to awakening and discharge safely compared to midazolam.

Remimazolam Use in Cardiac Anesthesia: A Narrative Review.

Remimazolam, a novel ultra-short-acting intravenous benzodiazepine, has garnered recent attention for its use as a general anesthetic. This narrative review aims to summarize and analyze the available literature on the effects of remimazolam use in cardiac surgical patients, including its effects on hemodynamics, safety in patients with baseline myocardial dysfunction, and impact on postoperative management including time to emergence and extubation. Finally, there is discussion regarding potential drawbacks of adopting remimazolam as a routine anesthetic for cardiac surgery.

Comparison of the recovery quality between remimazolam and propofol after general anesthesia: systematic review and a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Introduction: To evaluate the recovery quality between remimazolam and propofol after general anesthesia surgery. Methods: We included eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in EMBASE, PubMed, Cochrane Central, Scopus, and Web of Science up to June 26, 2024 for comparison the recovery quality of remimazolam and propofol after general anaesthesia. The primary outcomes were the total Quality of Recovery-15 (QoR-15) and five dimensions of QoR-15 on postoperative day 1 (POD1). Secondary outcomes were adverse events, the Quality of Recovery-40 (QoR-40) on POD1, and the intraoperative and postoperative time characteristics. Results: Thirteen RCTs with a total of 1,305 patients were included in this meta-analysis. Our statistical analysis showed that remimazolam group had higher QoR-15 score on POD1, with no significant difference (Mean Difference (MD) = 1.24; 95% confidence interval (CI), [-1.67-4.15]; I2 = 75%; P = 0.41). In the five dimensions of QoR-15, remimazolam group was superior to propofol group in terms of physical independence (MD = 0.79; 95% CI [0.31-1.27]; I2 = 0%; P = 0.001). Remimazolam group was lower than propofol group in incidence of hypotension (Risk Ratio (RR) = 0.48; 95% CI [0.40-0.59]; I2 = 14%; P < 0.00001), bradycardia (RR = 0.18; 95% CI [0.08-0.38]; I2 = 0%; P < 0.0001) and injection pain (RR = 0.03; 95% CI [0.01-0.12]; I2 = 48%; P < 0.00001), respectively. The intraoperative and postoperative time characteristics and the QoR-40 were similar in the two groups. Conclusions: Our analysis showed that the recovery quality of the remimazolam group after general anaesthesia was similar to propofol group, while the incidence of adverse events was low in remimazolam group. As a potential anesthetic, remimazolam can be used in place of propofol for surgical general anesthesia.

Effect of remimazolam versus propofol on hypotension after anesthetic induction in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting: A randomized controlled trial.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: There is scarce evidence on the hemodynamic stability of remimazolam during anesthetic induction in patients with significant coronary artery disease. This study aims to compare the effects of remimazolam and propofol on post-induction hypotension in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Tertiary teaching hospital. PATIENTS: Adult patients undergoing isolated CABG. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomly allocated to received either remimazolam (n = 50) or propofol (n = 50) for anesthetic induction. The remimazolam group received an initial infusion at 6 mg/kg/h, which was later adjusted to 1-2 mg/kg/h to maintain a bispectral index of 40-60 after loss of consciousness. In the propofol group, a 1.5 mg/kg bolus of propofol was administered, followed by 1-1.5% sevoflurane inhalation as needed to achieve the target bispectral index. MEASUREMENTS: The primary outcome was the area under the curve (AUC) below the baseline mean arterial pressure (MAP) during the first 10 min after anesthetic induction. Secondary outcomes included the AUC for MAP <65 mmHg and the requirement for vasopressors. MAIN RESULTS: The remimazolam group demonstrated a significantly lower AUC under the baseline MAP compared to the propofol group (mean [SD], 169.8 [101.0] mmHg·min vs. 220.6 [102.4] mmHg·min; mean difference [95% confidence interval], 50.8 [10.4-91.2] mmHg·min; P = 0.014). Additionally, the remimazolam group had a reduced AUC for MAP <65 mmHg (7.3 [10.3] mmHg·min vs. 13.9 [14.9] mmHg·min; P = 0.007) and a lower frequency of vasopressor use compared to the propofol group (60% vs. 88%, P = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Remimazolam may offer improved hemodynamic stability during anesthetic induction in patients undergoing CABG, suggesting its potential advantage over propofol for patients with significant coronary artery disease in terms of hemodynamic stability.

Remimazolam in General Anesthesia: A Comprehensive Review of Its Applications and Clinical Efficacy.

Remimazolam is a novel ultra-short-acting benzodiazepine with a unique pharmacokinetic profile that makes it an attractive option for use in general anesthesia. This review paper provides an in-depth analysis of remimazolam's applications in the field of general anesthesia, focusing on its pharmacological properties, clinical efficacy, safety profile, and potential advantages compared to other anesthetic agents. Remimazolam acts on GABAa receptors, offering rapid onset and recovery times due to its unique metabolic pathway involving tissue esterases. Clinical trials have demonstrated its efficacy in procedural sedation and general anesthesia, showing a favorable safety profile with minimal cardiovascular and respiratory depression. Compared to traditional anesthetics such as propofol, remimazolam presents distinct advantages, including predictable pharmacokinetics, reduced risk of prolonged sedation, and a reliable safety margin. These attributes position remimazolam as a promising agent in various clinical settings. The purpose of this review is to synthesize current evidence on remimazolam and discuss its potential to improve clinical outcomes in anesthesia practice.

Total Intravenous Anesthesia Using Remimazolam for Transcarotid Approach Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: A Case Report.

The transcarotid approach was introduced in Japan in April 2024 as an alternative approach for transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Because carotid artery blood flow is reduced on one side during the procedure, there is a risk of intraoperative brain stroke. Therefore, it is crucial to check for cerebral complications immediately after the procedure. We report a case involving an 87-year-old female who underwent transcarotid TAVR under general anesthesia with remimazolam and remifentanil. The operation was completed in a short period. There was no evidence of hypotension during the induction of anesthesia, and intraoperative blood pressure control was easy. However, there was a decrease in local oxygen saturation for approximately nine minutes intraoperatively. Following the administration of flumazenil, the patient was quickly awakened, and neurological findings were confirmed to be normal. The patient was discharged without complications. Our findings suggest that remimazolam, an ultra-short-acting benzodiazepine, is feasible for the transcarotid TAVR procedure due to its minimal circulatory impact and ability to facilitate rapid and reliable arousal.

The effects of remimazolam in combination with estazolam on postoperative hemodynamics and pain intensity in patients undergoing laparoscopic gastrointestinal surgery.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate the effects of combining remimazolam with estazolam on hemodynamics and pain levels after laparoscopic gastrointestinal surgery. METHODS: A total of 184 patients who underwent laparoscopic gastrointestinal surgery were enrolled in this double-blind randomized controlled trial. The patients were divided into four groups: Study Group 1(Remimazolam), Study Group 2(Estazolam), Study Group 3(Remimazolam + Estazolam), and Control Group. Anesthesia induction included intravenous injection of remimazolam and estazolam in the study groups, while the control group received normal saline. Hemodynamic parameters, stress responses, anxiety levels, and pain intensity were assessed at various time points. RESULTS: The results showed that the combination of remimazolam and estazolam significantly improved hemodynamic parameters compared to the control group. Study Group 3 exhibited the lowest anxiety levels and stress responses among all groups. Furthermore, Study Group 3 had the lowest pain intensity scores at different postoperative time points. CONCLUSION: The combination of remimazolam and estazolam effectively stabilized hemodynamics, reduced anxiety levels, and alleviated pain intensity after laparoscopic gastrointestinal surgery. These findings suggest that this combination therapy has the potential to improve surgical outcomes and patient comfort.

Retrospective comparison of the effects of remimazolam and dexmedetomidine on postoperative delirium in elderly patients undergoing orthopedic surgery of the lower extremities under spinal anesthesia.

PURPOSE: Remimazolam is often used for perioperative sedation due to its rapid onset and offset. However, the possible association between remimazolam and postoperative delirium (POD) remains undetermined. The present study evaluated whether remimazolam increased the incidence of POD compared with dexmedetomidine in elderly patients undergoing orthopedic surgery of the lower extremities. METHODS: This retrospective study included patients aged ≥ 65 years who had undergone orthopedic surgery of the lower extremities under spinal anesthesia from January 2020 to November 2022 and were sedated with continuous intravenous infusion of dexmedetomidine or remimazolam. The incidence of POD was assessed through a validated comprehensive review process of each patient's medical records. The effect of remimazolam on the occurrence of POD compared with dexmedetomidine was evaluated by propensity score weighted multivariable logistic models. RESULTS: A total of 447 patients were included in the final analysis. The crude incidence of POD within 3 days after surgery was 7.5% (17/226) in the dexmedetomidine group and 11.8% (26/221) in the remimazolam group, increasing to 9.7% (22/226) and 15.8% (35/221), respectively (p = 0.073), within 5 days. The multivariable models showed that, compared with dexmedetomidine, intraoperative sedation with remimazolam significantly increased the occurrence of POD within 3 days (odds ratio [OR] 2.21, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.31 to 3.82, p = 0.003) and 5 days (OR 2.10, 95% CI 1.32 to 3.40, p = 0.002). CONCLUSION: Compared with dexmedetomidine, remimazolam infusion may be associated with a higher risk of POD in elderly patients undergoing orthopedic surgery of the lower extremities under spinal anesthesia.

The Impact of Fentanyl on the Effective Dose of Remimazolam-Induced Sedation in Elderly Female Patients: An Up-and-Down Sequential Allocation Trial.

Purpose: This study aimed to investigate the influence of fentanyl on the effective dose of remimazolam-induced sedation in elderly female patients undergoing general anesthesia. Patients and Methods: Sixty female patients aged 65-80 years undergoing selective general anesthesia were randomized into two groups: Group R+F received an initial dose of remimazolam (7.5 mg) with fentanyl (1 µg/kg), while Group R received remimazolam alone. Dosing adjustments (±2.5 mg) were made based on the response of the preceding patient using the up-and-down allocation technique. The ED50 and ED95 were calculated using a sequential formula and probit regression. Probit regression was also used to assess the relative potency of remimazolam between groups. Sedation levels were evaluated using the Modified Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation (MOAA/S) scale. Results: The ED50 for remimazolam was significantly lower in Group R+F compared to Group R (p= 0.007). Probit regression estimated the ED50 and ED95 values for Group R+F at 4.878 mg (95% CI, 3.845-5.859) and 8.184 mg (95% CI, 6.636-13.546), respectively. In contrast, Group R demonstrated ED50 and ED95 values of 6.733 mg (95% CI, 5.533-8.068) and 11.298 mg (95% CI, 9.101-19.617), respectively. Conclusion: This study provides compelling evidence that the administration of 1 µg/kg of fentanyl significantly reduces the required sedative dose of remimazolam by approximately 30% during induction in elderly patients. Importantly, the concomitant use of 1 µg/kg of fentanyl does not increase the risk of adverse effects such as hypotension, respiratory depression.

Remimazolam Alleviates Ventilator-Induced Lung Injury by Activating TSPO to Inhibit Macrophage Pyroptosis.

BACKGROUND: Macrophages are activated in ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI), accompanied by macrophage pyroptosis. Remimazolam (Re) plays a role in inhibiting macrophage activation. In this study, we aimed to investigate the mechanism of Re in VILI. METHODS: A VILI model (20 mL/kg mechanical ventilation) was created using C57BL/6 mice. Alveolar macrophages were isolated from bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) and received mechanical stretching to simulate the mechanical ventilation in vitro. VILI model mice were treated with Re (16 mg/kg) to assess the alveolar structure, wet/dry (W/D) weight ratio, endothelial barrier antigen (EBA) permeability index, BALF protein content, inflammatory factors, macrophage pyroptosis, pyroptosis-related factors, and translocator protein (TSPO) level using a series of biological experiments. Whether Re alleviated macrophage pyroptosis by regulating TSPO was determined by rescue experiments. RESULTS: Re alleviated VILI, as evidenced by improvement of abnormal morphology of lung tissues during VILI and decreases in the lung W/D weight ratio, lung EBA permeability index, and BALF protein content. Re attenuated pulmonary inflammation and macrophage pyroptosis during VILI via down-regulation of inflammatory factors (myeloperoxidase, malondialchehyche, 8-hydroxy-2 deoxyguanosine, interleukin-6, tumor necrosis factor-α, macrophage inflammatory protein-2, interleukin-1ß, and interleukin-18), and pyroptosis factors (cleaved gasdermin D (GSDMD)/GSDMD value, NOD-like receptor thermal protein domain associated protein 3 (NLRP3), and caspase-1). Re activated TSPO in macrophages. TSPO overexpression rescued the cell stretch-inhibited macrophage viability and cell stretch-induced macrophage pyroptosis. CONCLUSION: Re alleviates VILI by activating TSPO to inhibit macrophage pyroptosis.

[Remimazolam-Update on basic pharmacologic principles and clinical potential]. / Remimazolam ­ Update zu Grundlagen und klinischem Potenzial.

In recent years the still relatively new short-acting benzodiazepine remimazolam has been approved and clinically implemented in several countries and regions. Remimazolam is also now approved in the EU and the market launch in Germany is expected in the not too distant future. This is therefore a good point in time to summarize the current evidence for various areas of application, including general anesthesia, sedation and intensive care medicine as well as different dosing schemes.

Effects of Propofol, Low and High Doses of Remimazolam on Hemodynamic and Inflammatory Response in Laparoscopic Surgery.

Background: This study explored the effects of different doses of remimazolam tosilate (RT) and propofol combined with remifentanil anesthesia on hemodynamic and inflammatory responses in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery. Subjects and Methods: Ninety patients with a BMI of less than 35 kg/m², classified as ASA II-III and scheduled for laparoscopic surgery, were enrolled in this study. Patients were divided into three groups: low-dose RT group (A), high-dose RT group (B), and propofol group (C). The changes in hemodynamic indices such as SBP, DBP, HR, MAP, and inflammatory response indices such as IL-6, SAA, CRP, and PCT, along with extubation time and doses of sufentanil, remifentanil, urapidil, and phenylephrine, were compared among the three groups. Results: There were no statistically significant differences in extubation time, doses of sufentanil and remifentanil, or the usage rates and average doses of urapidil and phenylephrine between the three groups. The average dose of phenylephrine in group A was lower than in group B and group C, with a statistically significant difference. There were no statistically significant differences among the groups in SBP, DBP, HR, and MAP from T0 to T2, nor in IL-6, SAA, CRP, or PCT levels. Conclusion: Using RT for induction and maintenance of anesthesia in laparoscopic surgery ensures stable hemodynamic and inflammatory responses in patients. Low-dose RT may reduce the usage rate and dose of vasopressors such as phenylephrine during surgery.

The Effect of Lidocaine-Prilocaine Cream Combined with or Without Remimazolam on VAS and APAIS Anxiety Score in Patient Undergoing Spinal Anesthesia.

Purpose: This study aimed to investigate patients' expectative pain of spinal anesthesia puncture and anxiety pre-anesthesia, and to examine the effect of lidocaine-prilocaine cream and remimazolam prior to spinal anesthesia puncture on pain relief and anxiety release. Methods: Patients undergoing spinal anesthesia were divided into control, lidocaine-prilocaine cream, and lidocaine-prilocaine cream with remimazolam groups. A questionnaire consisting of The Amsterdam Preoperative Anxiety and Information Scale (APAIS) and patient's concerns and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) was used to evaluate patient's anxiety and pain. The primary outcomes were differences in VAS and anxiety scores. Patient's spinal anesthesia-related concerns, advent events and hemodynamic index were also recorded. Results: The expected spinal anesthesia puncture pain was 5.34±0.27 and anxiety scores before spinal anesthesia was 10.88 ± 0.64. A statistically significant positive correlation of 31.3% was detected between VAS and APAIS scores (r = 0.313; P=0.003). The VAS score at the time of puncture decreased by 29.7% (3.78±0.40, P=0.001) in lidocaine-prilocaine cream group and 29.2% (3.75±0.39, P=0.001) in lidocaine-prilocaine cream with remimazolam group compared with the expected VAS score. Lidocaine-prilocaine cream combined with or without remimazolam reduced the percentage of moderate pain (21.4% and 31.3% vs 50.0%, P=0.0001) and increased mild pain (60.7% vs 59.4% vs 22.7%, P=0.03). Anxiety score in lidocaine-prilocaine cream group was reduced by 2.84 (8.04±0.76 vs 10.88 ± 0.46, P=0.05) when compared with pre-anesthesia. Concerns about postoperative pain (P=0.03) and fear of the needle or intervention (P=0.000) both decreased post-anesthesia among groups. Conclusion: Approximately half of the patients scheduled for spinal anesthesia experienced a moderate level of preoperative anxiety. The patient's pain expectation from the spinal anesthesia puncture was moderate, which was higher than the actual pain. Lidocaine-prilocaine cream with or without remimazolam sedative before spinal anesthesia puncture reduced the patient's pain and anxiety scores after surgery.

Carboxylesterase 1-Based Drug-Drug Interaction Potential of Remimazolam: In-Vitro Studies and Literature Review.

BACKGROUND: The ultra-short-acting benzodiazepine remimazolam, approved for procedural sedation and general anesthesia, is inactivated by carboxylesterase 1 (CES1). OBJECTIVE: Remimazolam´s involvement in CES1-mediated drug-drug interactions (DDIs) was investigated. METHODS: Possible interactions of remimazolam were studied in co-exposure experiments with eleven different drugs. Further, substrates and inhibitors of CES1, identified in the literature, were evaluated for possible in-vivo inhibition using pharmacokinetic and Ki or IC50 values. Compounds with only one published inhibitory concentration and CES1 substrates lacking inhibition data were assigned conservative Ki values. RESULTS: In human liver homogenates and/or blood cells, remimazolam showed no significant inhibition of esmolol and landiolol metabolism, which, in turn, at up to 98 and 169 µM, respectively, did not inhibit remimazolam hydrolysis by human liver homogenates. In human liver S9 fractions, IC50 values ranged from 0.69 µM (simvastatin) and 57 µM (diltiazem) to > 100 µM (atorvastatin) and, for the remaining test items (bupropion, carvedilol, nelfinavir, nitrendipine, and telmisartan), they ranged from 126 to 658 µM. Remifentanil was ineffective even at 1250 µM. Guidance-conforming evaluation revealed no relevant drug-drug interactions with remimazolam via CES1. The algorithm-based predictions were consistent with human study data. Among CES1 inhibitors and substrates identified in the literature, only dapsone and rufinamide were found to be possible in-vivo inhibitors of remimazolam metabolism. CONCLUSION: Data and analyses suggest a very low potential of remimazolam for pharmacokinetic DDIs mediated by CES1. The theoretical approach and compiled data are not specific to remimazolam and, hence, applicable in the evaluation of other CES1 substrates.

Anesthesia management for percutaneous mitral valve repair in a patient with mitochondrial cardiomyopathy and low cardiac function: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Mitochondrial cardiomyopathy occurs when impaired mitochondrial energy production leads to myocardial dysfunction. Anesthetic management in such cases is challenging due to risks of circulatory depression associated with anesthesia and mitochondrial dysfunction induced by anesthetics. Although there are reports of anesthetic management for patients with mitochondrial diseases, there are few reports specifically addressing cardiac anesthesia for patients with mitochondrial cardiomyopathy. We present a case where percutaneous mitral valve repair with MitraClip™ was successfully performed under remimazolam anesthesia in a patient with mitochondrial cardiomyopathy who developed functional mitral valve regurgitation due to low cardiac function and cardiomegaly. CASE PRESENTATION: A 57-year-old woman was diagnosed with chronic cardiac failure, with a 10-year history of dilated cardiomyopathy. She was diagnosed with mitochondrial cardiomyopathy 8 years ago. Over the past 2 years, her cardiac failure worsened, and mitral valve regurgitation gradually developed. Surgical intervention was considered but deemed too risky due to her low cardiac function, with an ejection fraction of 26%. Therefore, percutaneous MitraClip™ implantation was selected. After securing radial artery and central venous catheterization under sedation with dexmedetomidine, anesthesia was induced with a low dose of remimazolam 4 mg/kg/h. Anesthesia was maintained with remimazolam 0.35-1.0 mg/kg/h and remifentanil 0.1 µg/kg/min. Noradrenaline and dobutamine were administered intraoperatively, and the procedure was completed successfully without circulatory collapse. The patient recovered smoothly from anesthesia and experienced no complications. She was discharged on the eighth day after surgery. CONCLUSION: Anesthesia management with remimazolam appears to be a safe and effective for MitraClip™ implantation in patients with mitochondrial cardiomyopathy.

A Comparison of Hypotension, Bradycardia, and Hypoxia Incidence between the Use of Remimazolam and Other Sedative Agents during Colonoscopy Procedures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

(1) Background: Remimazolam is a newly developed sedative agent. The results of previous meta-analyses highlight the strengths of remimazolam for use during colonoscopy procedures. The primary aim of the present study was to investigate whether, in patients undergoing colonoscopy procedures (P), the use of remimazolam (I) compared with other sedative agents (C) could lead to a greater incidence of hypotension, bradycardia, and hypoxia (O). (2) Methods: In the following study, we conducted an extensive literature search using two electronic databases. We included all randomized control trials, which involved a comparison of the hemodynamic changes in remimazolam versus a placebo and other sedative agents during colonoscopy procedures. Data extraction, data synthesis, and the assessment of risk of bias were performed by the authors. (3) Results: A total of seven articles met our inclusion criteria. The combined analysis of the selected studies revealed no statistically significant difference in hypotension, bradycardia, or hypoxia incidence when comparing remimazolam and the control group. However, in comparison with the group administered propofol, the pooled data of the selected studies revealed statistically significant differences in the incidence of both hypotension and bradycardia but not hypoxia. (4) Conclusions: Our findings indicate that there is no significant difference in hypotension, bradycardia, and hypoxia incidence when comparing remimazolam and other agents. Nevertheless, when comparing the remimazolam and propofol groups, the results demonstrated statistically significant differences in the incidence of both hypotension and bradycardia but not hypoxia.

Remimazolam and Its Place in the Current Landscape of Procedural Sedation and General Anesthesia.

Remimazolam was derived from its parent compound by adding an ester linkage into its structure so that the drug becomes a substrate for ester metabolism. As a result, it undergoes organ-independent ester hydrolysis, although the clinical benefits in terms of shorter recovery are not uniformly observed in clinical practice. Remimazolam is mainly tested in procedural sedation. In comparison to propofol, the current gold standard for procedural sedation, its proposed attractiveness is shorter wake-up times and a clear-headed recovery. Its clear advantages over propofol are better hemodynamic stability, lack of pain on injection and availability of a reversal agent in the form of flumazenil. Data on patient and proceduralist satisfaction are lacking. Remimazolam is also used for induction and maintenance of general anesthesia in Japan (where it is approved for this purpose). In this scenario, it is not clear if it can achieve the same degree of lack of recall as propofol. The use of remimazolam in obstetrics, pediatrics and high-risk populations is an emerging area.

Remimazolam anesthesia in pediatric patients undergoing cardiac catheterization for congenital heart disease: a retrospective observational study.

BACKGROUND: Benzodiazepines are used in pediatric patients with congenital heart disease (CHD) because of their mild hemodynamic depressant effects. A novel short-acting benzodiazepine, remimazolam, is expected to be suitable for these patients. We examined the characteristics of remimazolam anesthesia in pediatric patients with CHD undergoing cardiac catheterization. METHODS: This single-center retrospective study included pediatric patients undergoing cardiac catheterization for CHD. The primary outcome was the remimazolam dose for loss of consciousness. Secondary outcomes included the mean maintenance remimazolam dose, recovery time from anesthesia, predicted remimazolam concentration at emergence, decrease in blood pressure and heart rate, vasopressor administration during anesthesia, electroencephalogram index (bispectral index: BIS or patient state index: PSI), and life-threatening adverse events. RESULTS: Thirty-nine patients, aged 2 months to 16 years, were included. Thirty-three patients received a median [interquartile] midazolam dose of 0.10 [0.10-0.10] mg.kg-1 in the pre-anesthesia room. The remimazolam dose for loss of consciousness was 0.34 [0.26-0.45] mg.kg-1. The mean maintenance dose was 1.0 [0.8-1.4] mg.kg-1.h-1. The recovery time was 15 [12-17] min. The predicted remimazolam concentration at emergence was 0.4-1.2 µg.ml-1 in 3-6-year-old patients. Blood pressure and heart rate decreased by 30% in 15 and 6 patients, respectively. Vasopressors were administered as a bolus in 8 patients. The BIS or PSI did not fall ≤ 60 or ≤ 50, respectively, in 51% of patients before tracheal intubation. No life-threatening adverse events were reported. CONCLUSIONS: Remimazolam is a good alternative anesthetic agent for pediatric patients undergoing cardiac catheterization for CHD.

Unveiling the impact of airways: A comparative analysis of oropharyngeal and nasopharyngeal airways in painless fiberoptic bronchoscopy.

Background: This study compared the efficacy of oropharyngeal airways (OA) and nasopharyngeal airways (NA) in maintaining oxygenation during painless fiberoptic bronchoscopy (PFB) in patients sedated with remimazolam besylate. Methods: Two hundred and fifty-two patients were randomized to the OA or NA group. Remimazolam besylate was used for anesthesia induction and maintenance in both groups. We measured and recorded several physiological parameters, including mean arterial pressure, heart rate and oxygen saturation (SpO2), at various time points: before anesthesia (T1), after anesthesia induction (T2), immediately after the bronchoscope reached the trachea (T3), during the procedure (T4), and 5 min after transfer to the post-anesthesia care unit (T5). The incidence and frequency of hypoxemia, minimum SpO2 during the procedure and patient awakening time after flumazenil administration were also recorded. Additionally, the relationship between minimum SpO2 and body mass index (BMI) was investigated. Results: Patients in the NA group experienced a higher incidence of hypoxemia compared to the OA group. Patients in the OA group maintained higher SpO2 levels at T3 and had a higher minimum SpO2 during the procedure than the NA group. Furthermore, a significant negative correlation was observed between minimum SpO2 and BMI. Following flumazenil anesthesia reversal, nearly 97 % of patients awakened within 1 min. Conclusions: This study suggests that OA may provide a better safety profile than NA by preserving respiratory function during PFB.