Randomised controlled trial comparing safety and efficacy of Urolift to monopolar TURP.

OBJECTIVES: Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH) is the most common cause of the Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms (LUTS) in ageing men. TURP is still the gold-standard procedure for the treatment of LUTS-BPH, however new minimally invasive modalities like Urolift procedure has been introduced. METHODS: Patients with prostate size up to 100 g were offered both treatment modalities. Hundred patients were included in the study, 100 in TURP group (group A) and 100 in Urolift group (group B). International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) was used at initial contact and for evaluation of response to treatment. Group A underwent TURP under regional anaesthetic, while group B underwent Urolift under sedation. RESULTS: The mean age in both groups was 66.4 years. The IPSS score improvement among both groups is attached in the diagram. Group B patients had less hospital stay, better erectile and ejaculatory function compared to group B, and no stress incontinence was detected in group B while 6.7% of the patients in group A suffered some stress incontinence. CONCLUSION: Urolift has the benefit of preserving the ejaculatory function and less complications. Nevertheless, it has size limitations and the IPSS score improvement is less satisfactory when compared to TURP.

Phalangeal fractures: A retrospective comparison of open reduction and internal fixation vs. closed reduction and percutaneous pinning.

The treatment of phalangeal fractures is guided by fracture characteristics, patient factors and surgeon judgment. This study retrospectively compares characteristics of phalangeal fractures treated with closed reduction percutaneous pinning (CRPP) with those of fractures treated with open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) to identify risk factors associated with reoperation. A total of 901 phalangeal fractures were included and treated operatively by either CRPP (748 fractures, 83 â€‹%) or ORIF (153 fractures, 17 â€‹%). Demographics, surgical management, and complication data were collected. Statistical analyses were performed to stratify risk associations and identify potential predictors of reoperation. With multivariate analysis and bootstrapped LASSO regression, fractures addressed by means of ORIF (vs. CRPP), work-related fractures, and open fractures were found to be independently associated with reoperation. These findings can be used to guide patient selection, surgical planning and timing of fracture repair. Level of evidence: Level III, Therapeutic.

Goldenhar syndrome associated with increased risk of respiratory failure and reoperations following spinal deformity surgery.

BACKGROUND: Goldenhar syndrome is a rare congenital disease that presents with a spectrum of clinical sequelae related to the vertebrae and other organs. The spinal manifestations of the syndrome are associated with scoliosis for which fusion may be considered. The current study aimed to evaluate the risks of adverse events and reoperations following posterior spinal fusion for those with Goldenhar syndrome relative to those with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). METHODS: Patients with Goldenhar syndrome and AIS between the ages of 10 and 17 who underwent posterior spinal fusion were abstracted from the 2010 to 2022 PearlDiver Database. The Goldenhar syndrome patients were matched 1:4 to patients with AIS based on age, sex, and Elixhauser Comorbidity Index. All 90 day postoperative adverse events, readmissions, and 5 year reoperations were identified using administrative coding. Incidence of adverse events between the cohorts were compared using multivariate logistic regression. RESULTS: A total of 11,742 patients with AIS and 72 (0.61%) Goldenhar syndrome undergoing deformity surgery were identified. On matched comparison, patients with Goldenhar syndromes had higher odds ratio (OR) of respiratory failure (OR: 2.99, p = 0.009), severe adverse events (p = 2.29, p = 0.01), and readmissions (p = 2.26, p = 0.02). Over 5 years, they had a significantly higher incidence of reoperation compared to those with AIS (18.1% versus 5.5%, p = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: In this national sample of patients with Goldenhar syndrome undergoing posterior spinal fusion, patients with Goldenhar had increased odds of respiratory failure, readmissions, and reoperations. Targeted risk mitigation strategies may be appropriately considered for those with Goldenhar syndrome undergoing such surgeries. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III; Case-control study or retrospective cohort study.

Radical cholecystectomy without liver resection for peritoneal side early incidental gallbladder cancer.

Gallbladder cancer (GBC) is a rare disease with a poor prognosis. Simple cholecystectomy may be an adequate treatment only for very early disease (Tis, T1a), whereas reoperation is recommended for more advanced disease (T1b and T2). Radical cholecystectomy should have two fundamental objectives: To radically resect the liver parenchyma and to achieve adequate clearance of the lymph nodes. However, recent studies have shown that compared with lymph node dissection alone, liver resection does not improve survival outcomes. The oncological roles of lymphadenectomy and liver resection is distinct. Therefore, for patients with incidental GBC without liver invasion, hepatic resection is not always mandatory.

Identifying clinically meaningful subgroups following open reduction and internal fixation for proximal humerus fractures: a risk stratification analysis for mortality and 30-day complications using machine learning.

Background: Identification of prognostic variables for poor outcomes following open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) of displaced proximal humerus fractures have been limited to singular, linear factors and subjective clinical intuition. Machine learning (ML) has the capability to objectively segregate patients based on various outcome metrics and reports the connectivity of variables resulting in the optimal outcome. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to (1) use unsupervised ML to stratify patients to high-risk and low-risk clusters based on postoperative events, (2) compare the ML clusters to the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification for assessment of risk, and (3) determine the variables that were associated with high-risk patients after proximal humerus ORIF. Methods: The American College of Surgeons-National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was retrospectively queried for patients undergoing ORIF for proximal humerus fractures between 2005 and 2018. Four unsupervised ML clustering algorithms were evaluated to partition subjects into "high-risk" and "low-risk" subgroups based on combinations of observed outcomes. Demographic, clinical, and treatment variables were compared between these groups using descriptive statistics. A supervised ML algorithm was generated to identify patients who were likely to be "high risk" and were compared to ASA classification. A game-theory-based explanation algorithm was used to illustrate predictors of "high-risk" status. Results: Overall, 4670 patients were included, of which 202 were partitioned into the "high-risk" cluster, while the remaining (4468 patients) were partitioned into the "low-risk" cluster. Patients in the "high-risk" cluster demonstrated significantly increased rates of the following complications: 30-day mortality, 30-day readmission rates, 30-day reoperation rates, nonroutine discharge rates, length of stay, and rates of all surgical and medical complications assessed with the exception of urinary tract infection (P < .001). The best performing supervised machine learning algorithm for preoperatively identifying "high-risk" patients was the extreme-gradient boost (XGBoost), which achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristics curve of 76.8%, while ASA classification had an area under the receiver operating characteristics curve of 61.7%. Shapley values identified the following predictors of "high-risk" status: greater body mass index, increasing age, ASA class 3, increased operative time, male gender, diabetes, and smoking history. Conclusion: Unsupervised ML identified that "high-risk" patients have a higher risk of complications (8.9%) than "low-risk" groups (0.4%) with respect to 30-day complication rate. A supervised ML model selected greater body mass index, increasing age, ASA class 3, increased operative time, male gender, diabetes, and smoking history to effectively predict "high-risk" patients.

Mid- to long-term outcome of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty as revision procedure for failed hemiarthroplasty after proximal humerus fracture.

BACKGROUND: Insufficient tuberosity healing is the most common reason for poor outcome after treatment of proximal humerus fractures (PHFs) using hemiarthroplasty (HA). In these cases, revision to reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) can improve function and reduce pain in the short term, however, long-term results remain scarce. Aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical and radiological mid- to long-term results in patients with a revision RTSA after failed HA for PHF. METHODS: In this retrospective study all patients that received a revision to RTSA after failed fracture HA between 2006 and 2018 were included. A total of 49 shoulders in 48 patients (38 female, 10 male; mean age 82 ± 9 years) were identified in our database. A total of 20 patients (17 female, 3 male; mean age was 79 ± 9 years) were available for follow-up examination after a mean time period of approximately eight years (3-14 years) after revision surgery. At final follow-up, patients were assessed using a subjective shoulder value (SSV), range of motion (ROM), visual analogue score (VAS), the Constant Score (CS) and the 12-Item Short Form Survey (SF-12). RESULTS: At final follow-up, mean CS was 55 ± 19 (19-91), VAS averaged 3 ± 3 (0-8) and mean SSV was 61 ± 18% (18-90%). Mean SF-12 was 44 (28-57) with a mean physical component summary (PCS) of 38 (21-56) and a mean mental component summary (MCS) of 51 (29-67). On average active forward flexion (FF) was 104° (10-170°), active abduction (ABD) was 101° (50-170°), active external rotation (ER) was 19° (10-30°) and active internal rotation (IR) of the lumbosacral transition was reached. Three patients presented with a periprosthetic humeral fracture after RTSA implantation and underwent a reoperation (15%) during follow-up period. CONCLUSIONS: Revision RTSA results in promising clinical results in patients after initial failed HA after PHF. A complication and reoperation rate of 15% is tolerable in consideration of satisfactory functional and psychological outcome. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Retrospectively registered.

Causes and predictors of unplanned reoperations within 30 days post laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: a comprehensive analysis.

Objective: To delineate the risk factors and causes of unplanned reoperations within 30 days following laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (LPD). Methods: A retrospective study reviewed 311 LPD patients at Ningbo Medical Center Li Huili Hospital from 2017 to 2024. Demographic and clinical parameters were analyzed using univariate and multivariate analyses, with P < 0.05 indicating statistical significance. Results: Out of 311 patients, 23 (7.4%) required unplanned reoperations within 30 days post-LPD, primarily due to postoperative bleeding (82.6%). Other causes included anastomotic leakage, abdominal infection, and afferent loop obstruction. The reoperation intervals varied, with the majority occurring within 0 to 14 days post-surgery. Univariate analysis identified significant risk factors: diabetes, liver cirrhosis, elevated CRP on POD-3 and POD-7, pre-operative serum prealbumin < 0.15 g/L, prolonged operation time, intraoperative bleeding > 120 ml, vascular reconstruction, soft pancreatic texture, and a main pancreatic duct diameter ≤3 mm (all P < 0.05). Multivariate analysis confirmed independent risk factors: pre-operative serum prealbumin < 0.15 g/L (OR = 3.519, 95% CI 1.167-10.613), CRP on POD-7 (OR = 1.013, 95% CI 1.001-1.026), vascular reconstruction (OR = 9.897, 95% CI 2.405-40.733), soft pancreatic texture (OR = 5.243, 95% CI 1.628-16.885), and a main pancreatic duct diameter ≤3 mm (OR = 3.462, 95% CI 1.049-11.423), all associated with unplanned reoperation within 30 days post-LPD (all P < 0.05). Conclusion: Postoperative bleeding is the primary cause of unplanned reoperations after LPD. Independent risk factors, confirmed by multivariate analysis, include low pre-operative serum prealbumin, elevated CRP on POD-7, vascular reconstruction, soft pancreatic texture, and a main pancreatic duct diameter of ≤3 mm. Comprehensive peri-operative management focusing on these risk factors can reduce the likelihood of unplanned reoperations and improve patient outcomes.

Long-Term Follow-Up Regarding Pain Relief, Fertility, and Re-Operation after Surgery for Deep Endometriosis.

Background: Endometriosis is known to be a common chronic disease that often affects the quality of life of patients. Especially for deep endometriosis (DE), the most challenging form of the disease, surgery remains an important component of treatment. However, long-term outcomes after surgery are poorly studied. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the postoperative clinical course of women with DE who underwent surgery, particularly with regard to pain relief, fertility, and re-operations. Methods: Thus, women who underwent surgical treatment for DE between 2005 and 2015 were included in this retrospective questionnaire-based analysis. Results: A total of 87.0% of the patients who underwent surgery for pain reported a postoperative relief of their complaints. Moreover, 44.6% even stated that they were free of pain at the time of the questionnaire. Patients who underwent surgery for infertility and tried to become pregnant postoperatively gave birth to a child in 45.9% of cases. Approximately one-third of the patients had to undergo another surgery because of endometriosis-related symptoms. The main reasons for re-operation were pain and infertility. The median time to re-operation was 2.1 years. Conclusions: In this extraordinarily long follow-up with a remarkable response rate, we show that surgical treatment of DE leads to pain relief and improved fertility in most cases. However, the risk of recurrence and the need for re-operation remains remarkable.

In-hospital outcomes of repair and hysterectomy for uterine rupture: A nationwide observational study.

OBJECTIVE: Uterine rupture, though rare, poses significant risks to both mother and child. Its occurrence varies globally, with a noted 0.015% prevalence in Japan. This condition usually requires surgical intervention, either as uterine repair or hysterectomy. Past studies, largely single-center and outdated, offer limited insights into these treatment options. To assess and compare the clinical outcomes of repair and hysterectomy for uterine rupture among patients included in a large inpatient database in Japan. STUDY DESIGN: We analyzed the Diagnosis Procedure Combination inpatient database from July 2010 to March 2022. Patients with uterine rupture who underwent uterine repair or hysterectomy were extracted. Patient characteristics, in-hospital care, and outcomes were compared between the uterine repair group and the hysterectomy group. Main outcomes are reoperation during hospitalization, total volume of blood transfusion, complications (bowel injury, urinary tract injury, wound infection, deep vein thrombosis, or pulmonary embolism), maternal mortality, and postoperative length of stay. RESULTS: We identified 644 patients with uterine rupture. Of those, 287 (44.6 %) underwent uterine repair and 357 (55.4 %) underwent hysterectomy. The hysterectomy group was significantly older, had significantly more comorbidities, and had a significantly higher prevalence of consciousness impairment than the uterine repair group. Compared with the uterine repair group, the hysterectomy group required significantly more in-hospital care and had a significantly greater incidence of reoperation (1.0 % versus 6.4 %; P<0.001). Other complications were not significantly different between the groups. The hysterectomy group had significantly more blood transfusions and a significantly longer postoperative length of hospital stay than the uterine repair group. The results remained consistent even after the adjusted analysis. CONCLUSION: This study highlights the differences between repair and hysterectomy for uterine rupture, providing valuable insights for clinical decision-making in these cases.

Patient Acceptance of Reoperation Risk for Lumbar Decompression Versus Fusion.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Lumbar decompression and lumbar fusion are effective methods of treating spinal compressive pathologies refractory to conservative management. These surgeries are typically used to treat different spinal problems, but there is a growing body of literature investigating the outcomes of either approach for patients with lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis and stenosis. Different operations are associated with different risks and different potential needs for reoperation. Patient acceptance of reoperation rates after spinal surgery is currently not well understood. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to identify patient tolerance for reoperation rates following lumbar decompression and lumbar fusion surgery. DESIGN: A qualitative and quantitative survey intended to capture information on patient preferences was administered. PATIENT SAMPLE: Written informed consent was obtained from patients presenting to two spinal clinics. OUTCOME MEASURES: Patients were asked their threshold tolerance for reoperation rates in the context of choosing a smaller (decompression) versus larger (fusion) spinal surgery. METHODS: A survey was administered to patients at two spinal clinics-one surgical and one non-surgical. A consecutive series of new patients over multiple clinic days who agreed to participate in the study and filled out the survey are reported on here. Patients were asked to assess, contemplating a problem that could either be treated with lumbar decompression or lumbar fusion, the level at which 1) the likelihood that needing a repeat surgery within 3-5 years would change their mind about choosing the decompression operation and cause them to choose the fusion operation and then 2) the likelihood of needing a repeat surgery within 3-5 years that would be acceptable to them after the fusion operation. The distribution of patient responses was assessed with histograms and descriptive statistics. RESULTS: Ninety patients were surveyed, and of these, 73 patients (81.1%) returned fully completed questionnaires. The median reoperation acceptance rates after a decompression was <60%, while the median acceptable revision rate when contemplating the fusion surgery was 10%. CONCLUSIONS: Patient acceptance for the potential need for revision surgery is higher when considering a decompression compared to a fusion operation. Reoperation risk rates along with the magnitude of the surgical intervention are important considerations in determining patients' surgical preferences. Understanding patient preferences and risk tolerances can aid clinicians in shared decision-making, potentially improving patient satisfaction and outcomes in the several lumbar pathologies which can be ameliorated with either decompression or fusion.

Systematic review with meta-analysis of intraoperative neuromonitoring during thyroid reoperation.

Objective: Recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) injury is a serious complication during thyroid reoperation. Intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM) is one of the means to reduce RLN paralysis. However, the role of IONM during thyroidectomy is still controversial. The aim of this study was to assess whether the IONM could reduce the incidence of RLN injury during thyroid reoperation. Methods: We performed a systematic review to identify studies in English language which were published between January 1, 2004, and March 25, 2023 from PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library, comparing the use of IONM and Visualization Alone (VA) during thyroid reoperation. The RLN injury rate was calculated in relation to the number of nerves at risk. All data were analyzed using Review Manger (version 5.3) software. The Cochran Q test (I2 test) was used to test for heterogeneity. Odds ratios were estimated by fixed effects model or random effects model, according to the heterogeneity level. Results: Eleven studies (3655 at-risk nerves) met criteria for inclusion. Data presented as odds ratio(OR) and their 95% confidence intervals(CI). Incidence of overall, temporary, and permanent RLN injury in IONM group were, respectively, 4.67%, 4.17%, and 2.39%, whereas for the VA group, they were 8.30%, 6.27%, and 2.88%. The summary OR of overall, temporary, and permanent RLN injury compared using IONM and VA were, respectively, 0.68 (95%CI 0.4-1.14, p=0.14), 0.82 (95%CI 0.39-1.72, p=0.60), and 0.62 (95%CI 0.4-0.96, p=0.03). Conclusions: The presented data showed benefits of reducing permanent RLN injury by using IONM, but without statistical significance for temporary RLN injury.

Effects of Preexisting Anxiety and Depression on Postoperative Outcomes in Patients Aged 30 Years and Younger Following Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome.

Background: Mental health influences postoperative outcomes in orthopedic procedures. Increasing attention is being paid to this effect. Purpose: We sought to evaluate the effect of diagnosed depression, anxiety, or both on postoperative outcomes in patients who have undergone hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS). Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 289 patients aged 30 years or younger who underwent hip arthroscopy for FAIS at a single institution from January 2014 to June 2021. Univariate statistics were used to assess differences between patients diagnosed with depression, anxiety, or both, and those without these diagnoses. Differences included demographics, operative characteristics, and postoperative outcomes: duration of postanesthesia care unit (PACU) stay, PACU pain scores, complications, reoperations, postoperative injections, 90-day emergency department (ED) visits, and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). Multivariate analysis was used to evaluate risk factors for postoperative complications, including wound infection, documented reinjury, postoperative intra-articular hip injection, and any reoperation. Results: Patients diagnosed with depression, anxiety, or both were more likely to be older, female, and have a higher comorbidity burden. At the time of surgery, they were more likely to undergo concomitant procedures, including bursectomy and iliotibial band release. Postoperatively, they had longer PACU stays (90.5 vs 75.1 minutes) and higher first PACU pain scores (5.9 vs 4.6), as well as higher rates of postoperative injection (18.1 vs 9.2%), any reoperation (13.9% vs 4.6%), and revision hip arthroscopy (11.1% vs. 3.7%). Diagnoses of depression, anxiety, or both were independently predictive of any reoperation (odds ratio [OR] = 2.841) and revision hip arthroscopy (OR = 3.401). Conclusion: This retrospective cohort study found that, in patients undergoing hip arthroscopy for FAIS, there was an association between a diagnosis of depression, anxiety, or both, and increased comorbidities, higher first PACU pain scores, longer PACU stays, and increased rates of postoperative injection, any reoperation, or revision hip arthroscopy. Targeted interventions may improve outcomes, but further study is warranted.

Cumulative re-operation rates during follow-up after hypospadias repair.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the cumulative rates of re-operations after hypospadias repair and evaluate long-term surgical outcomes at a tertiary paediatric urology centre. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Retrospective analysis of 293 boys born between 1991 and 2003 undergoing hypospadias surgery was conducted. The study included 274 patients: 165 with distal, 34 with midshaft, and 75 with proximal hypospadias. Kaplan-Meier methods were used to evaluate the re-operation data. RESULTS: The median age at primary surgery was 1.3 years, with a median follow-up of 14.4 years. The overall re-operation rate was 48.2%, with approximately half of the problems detected within the first 3 months after surgery. The risk of re-operation was correlated with hypospadias severity, with 5- and 15-year re-operation risks at 39.3% and 51.8%, respectively. Limitations of the study include its retrospective nature and variations in surgical techniques from current standards. CONCLUSION: There is a significant risk of unplanned re-operations following hypospadias repair, increasing with the severity of the original condition. This underscores the need for extended follow-up and effective communication with patients and their families about the likelihood of requiring multiple surgeries for optimal outcomes.

Readmission rate and early complications in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty: A retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) can improve pain, quality of life, and functional outcomes. Although uncommon, postoperative complications are extremely consequential and thus must be carefully tracked and communicated to patients to assist their decision-making before surgery. Identification of the risk factors for complications and readmissions after TKA, taking into account common causes, temporal trends, and risk variables that can be changed or left unmodified, will benefit this process. AIM: To assess readmission rates, early complications and their causes after TKA at 30 days and 90 days post-surgery. METHODS: This was a prospective and retrospective study of 633 patients who underwent TKA at our hospital between January 1, 2017, and February 28, 2022. Of the 633 patients, 28 were not contactable, leaving 609 who met the inclusion criteria. Both inpatient and outpatient hospital records were retrieved, and observations were noted in the data collection forms. RESULTS: Following TKA, the 30-day and 90-day readmission rates were determined to be 1.1% (n = 7) and 1.8% (n = 11), respectively. The unplanned visit rate at 30 days following TKA was 2.6% (n = 16) and at 90 days was 4.6% (n = 28). At 90 days, the unplanned readmission rate was 1.4% (n = 9). Reasons for readmissions included medical (27.2%, n = 3) and surgical (72.7%, n = 8). Unplanned readmissions and visits within 90 days of follow-up did not substantially differ by age group (P = 0.922), body mass index (BMI) (P = 0.633), unilateral vs bilateral TKA (P = 0.696), or patient comorbidity status (30-day P = 0.171 and 90-day P = 0.813). Reoperation rates after TKA were 0.66% (n = 4) at 30 days and 1.15% (n = 8) at 90 days. The average length of stay was 6.53 days. CONCLUSION: In this study, there was a low readmission rate following TKA. There was no significant correlation between readmission rate and patient factors such as age, BMI, and co-morbidity status.

Revision Surgery after Single Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion With Plate vs Stand-Alone Cage over 2 to 5 Year Follow-Up.

STUDY DESIGN: retrospective study. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the incidence of all-cause revision surgery between plated vs stand-alone cage constructs for single level ACDF. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed a commercial insurance claims database. Patients 18-65 years-old were included if they underwent single-level inpatient ACDF (defined with CPT codes) from 2010 - 2018, with a minimum of 2-year continuous insurance enrollment. The primary independent variable was the use of anterior plating vs zero profile device or stand-alone cage. Synthetic (ie, metal, PEEK, etc.) vs allograft interbody was a secondary independent variable. The primary outcome variable was revision cervical arthrodesis after the index operation. RESULTS: In total, 21092 patients undergoing single-level inpatient ACDF were included. 10.0% received a stand-alone cage during the index operation. Mean follow-up duration was 4.5 years. Revision arthrodesis occurred in 8.2% of patients overall, at a mean of 2.4 years after the index surgery. Patients with anterior plating had a lower rate of all-cause revision surgery in unadjusted (overall rate 8.1% vs 9.6%, P = 0.0185) and adjusted analysis (OR 0.78, P = 0.0016) vs stand-alone cages. Patients with stand-alone cages had higher rates of revision with a posterior approach than did patients with plated constructs. In sub-analysis, the combination of a stand-alone interbody device with an allograft had significantly higher odds of revision than other combinations of devices. CONCLUSION: Among commercially insured patients ≤65 years-old undergoing single-level ACDF, anterior plating was associated with a reduced incidence of revision surgery compared to stand-alone cages within the follow up period of our study.

[Reasons and strategies of reoperation after oblique lateral interbody fusion].

OBJECTIVE: To summarize the reasons and management strategies of reoperation after oblique lateral interbody fusion (OLIF), and put forward preventive measures. METHODS: From October 2015 to December 2019, 23 patients who underwent reoperation after OLIF in four spine surgery centers were retrospectively analyzed. There were 9 males and 14 females with an average age of (61.89±8.80) years old ranging from 44 to 81 years old. The index diagnosis was degenerative lumbar intervertebral dics diseases in 3 cases, discogenic low back pain in 1 case, degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis in 6 cases, lumbar spinal stenosis in 9 cases and degenerative lumbar spinal kyphoscoliosis in 4 cases. Sixteen patients were primarily treated with Stand-alone OLIF procedures and 7 cases were primarily treated with OLIF combined with posterior pedicle screw fixation. There were 17 cases of single fusion segment, 2 of 2 fusion segments, 4 of 3 fusion segments. All the cases underwent reoperation within 3 months after the initial surgery. The strategies of reoperation included supplementary posterior pedicle screw instrumentation in 16 cases;posterior laminectomy, cage adjustment and neurolysis in 2 cases, arthroplasty and neurolysis under endoscope in 1 case, posterior laminectomy and neurolysis in 1 case, pedicle screw adjustment in 1 case, exploration and decompression under percutaneous endoscopic in 1 case, interbody fusion cage and pedicle screw revision in 1 case. Visual analogue scale (VAS) and Oswestry disability index (ODI) index were used to evaluate and compare the recovery of low back pain and lumbar function before reoperation and at the last follow-up. During the follow-up process, the phenomenon of fusion cage settlement or re-displacement, as well as the condition of intervertebral fusion, were observed. The changes in intervertebral space height before the first operation, after the first operation, before the second operation, 3 to 5 days after the second operation, 6 months after the second operation, and at the latest follow-up were measured and compared. RESULTS: There was no skin necrosis and infection. All patients were followed up from 12 to 48 months with an average of (28.1±7.3) months. Nerve root injury symptoms were relieved within 3 to 6 months. No cage transverse shifting and no dislodgement, loosening or breakage of the instrumentation was observed in any patient during the follow-up period. Though the intervertebral disc height was obviously increased at the first postoperative, there was a rapid loss in the early stage, and still partially lost after reoperation. The VAS for back pain recovered from (6.20±1.69) points preoperatively to (1.60±0.71) points postoperatively(P<0.05). The ODI recovered from (40.60±7.01)% preoperatively to (9.14±2.66)% postoperatively(P<0.05). CONCLUSION: There is a risk of reoperation due to failure after OLIF surgery. The reasons for reoperation include preoperative bone loss or osteoporosis the initial surgery was performed by Stand-alone, intraoperative endplate injury, significant subsidence of the fusion cage after surgery, postoperative fusion cage displacement, nerve damage, etc. As long as it is discovered in a timely manner and handled properly, further surgery after OLIF surgery can achieve better clinical results, but prevention still needs to be strengthened.

Pros and cons of partial reversal with gastro-gastrostomy in patients with refractory hypoalbuminemia following one-anastomosis gastric bypass.

PURPOSE: Hypoalbuminemia following One-Anastomosis Gastric Bypass (OAGB) surgery remains a major concern among bariatric surgeons. This study aims to assess the outcome of partial reversal to normal anatomy with gastro-gastrostomy alone in patients with refractory hypoalbuminemia following OAGB surgery. METHODS: A retrospective study was performed on patients who underwent partial reversal surgery with gastro-gastrostomy alone due to refractory hypoalbuminemia post-OAGB surgery, using data from the Iran National Obesity Surgery Database, from 2013 to 2022. RESULTS: Of 4640 individuals undergoing OAGB, 11 underwent gastro-gastrostomy due to refractory hypoalbuminemia. The median time from OAGB to partial reversal was 16.6 months and the BPL length ranged from 155 to 200 cm. The follow-up period ranged from 1 to 7 years. The mean BMI was 27.3 (7.5) kg/m² before partial reversal. The mean BMI post-reversal was 30.9 (4.2) kg/m² after 1 year and 33.3 (3.8) kg/m² after 2 years. Serum albumin levels significantly increased from 3.0 (0.4) g/dL to 4.0 (0.5) g/dL following gastro-gastrostomy (p-value < 0.001). Serum liver enzymes (SGOT, SGPT, ALP) significantly decreased post-gastro-gastrostomy (p-value < 0.05). Nine individuals (81.8%) achieved resolution of hypoalbuminemia after gastro-gastrostomy with maintenance of ≥ 20% TWL and ≥ 50% EWL. No cases of anastomotic stricture, leak, bleeding, or major complications were reported after gastro-gastrostomy. CONCLUSION: Gastro-gastrostomy appears to be a safe and efficacious technique for addressing refractory hypoalbuminemia following OAGB. The procedure preserves the weight loss achieved following OAGB without significant complications. However, further studies are required to validate these findings.

The Impact of Surgeon Volume on Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty Survivorship: A Michigan Arthroplasty Registry Collaborative Quality Initiative Database Analysis.

BACKGROUND: The utilization of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) has remained low when compared to total knee arthroplasty (TKA), possibly due to higher rates of revision and reoperation. This study aimed to quantify surgeon UKA case-volumes and measure the effect of surgeon volume on early revision. We hypothesized that surgeons who have high case volumes would have lower revision rates compared to medium- and low-volume surgeons. METHODS: Primary UKAs were performed between February 2012 and November 2021, and associated revisions were identified utilizing the Michigan Arthroplasty Registry Collaborative Quality Initiative. Surgeon information, including total cases and annual UKA volume, was collected. Case volume per year was stratified as High (≥ 35 cases per year), Medium (15 to 34 cases per year), and low (< 15 cases per year). RESULTS: There were a total of 15,542 UKAs performed. Of these, 701 (4.5%) were revised, and 412 (58.8%) revisions occurred within 2 years. Of the 287 surgeons who performed an UKA in the registry, 237 (82.6%) were low-volume surgeons, 36 (12.5%) were medium-volume, and 14 (4.9%) were high-volume. High-volume surgeons were more likely to operate on older patients (P < 0.01), Medicare patients (P < 0.01), and patients who had American Society of Anesthesiologists scores of III and IV (P < 0.01). High-volume surgeons had significantly lower 5-year revision rates compared to medium and low-volume surgeons (high: 4.3% (95% confidence interval: 3.7 to 4.9), medium: 5.2% (4.4 to 6.1), low: 7.2% (6.4 to 8.0); P < 0.001). In comparison, the 5-year revision rate for TKA in Michigan was 3.0% (95% confidence interval: 2.9 to 3.1). CONCLUSIONS: When UKAs were performed by high-volume surgeons in the state of Michigan, there was better survivorship when compared to low-and medium-volume surgeons. High-volume surgeons were more likely to perform UKA on older patients, Medicare patients, and patients who had American Society of Anesthesiologists scores of III and IV. The revision rate for the high-volume surgeons still exceeded the 5-year revision rate for TKA in Michigan.

Reoperative aortic root replacement following previous cardiac surgery or type A aortic dissection repair.

OBJECTIVE: Reoperative aortic root replacement (ARR) is a technically challenging procedure. This study assesses the influence of reoperation on outcomes following ARR, particularly after prior acute type A aortic dissection repair. METHODS: Of the 1823 patients in this study, 1592 (87.3%) underwent primary ARR, and 231 (12.7%) underwent reoperative ARR. Within the reoperative ARR group, 69 patients (29.9%) had previous acute type A aortic dissection repair, and 162 patients (70.1%) underwent reoperative ARR for other indications. RESULTS: Reoperative ARR patients exhibited higher rates of ischemic heart disease (13.9% vs 3%; P < .001), diabetes (10% vs 5.3%; P = .009), chronic pulmonary disease (9.1% vs 5%; P = .018), renal impairment (17.7% vs 5.3%; P < .001), and had lower ejection fraction (45.5% ± 8.1% vs 47.6% ± 7.9%; P < .001) compared with primary ARR. The overall operative mortality was 0.4%, with no significant difference between groups (0.9% vs 0.3%; P = .485). At multivariable analysis, previous operation was the most powerful predictor for major adverse events (odds ratio, 3.20; 95% CI, 2.12-4.79; P < .001). Reoperative ARR had a lower 10-year survival compared with primary ARR (67.4% vs 85.9%; log-rank P < .001). Multivariable analysis further confirmed that reoperation was significantly associated with 10-year mortality (hazard ratio, 1.76; 95% CI, 1.01-3.06; P = .044). Among the reoperative ARR group, operative mortality after previous acute type A aortic dissection repair was similar to that for other etiologies (0% vs 1.2%; P = .880). CONCLUSIONS: Patients undergoing reoperative ARR have more comorbidities and extensive aortic disease compared with those undergoing primary surgery. They face a 3.5-fold increased risk of major adverse events but no difference in operative mortality compared with primary ARR.

Bi-National Outcomes of Redo Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in the Era of Valve-in-Valve Transcatheter Aortic Valve.

BACKGROUND: Implantation of bioprosthetic valves is more common as the population ages and there is a shift towards implanting bioprosthetic aortic valves in an increasingly younger surgical population. Bioprosthetic heart valve insertion, however, carries the long-term risk of valve failure through structural valve degeneration. Re-operative surgical aortic valve replacement has historically been the only definitive management option for patients with prosthetic valve dysfunction, however, data on the short- and long-term outcomes following re-operative surgery in Australia and New Zealand is limited. METHOD: Data on all patients who underwent redo aortic valve surgery, over a 20-year period (up to 2021) was obtained from the Australian and New Zealand Society of Cardiothoracic Surgery Registry. RESULTS: A total of 1,199 patients (770 males; 64.2% and 429 females; 35.8%) were included in the overall analysis. The 30-day mortality was 6.4% with operative urgency status the most important risk factor for peri-operative mortality. The long-term survival rate of 1,145 patients was 90.5% (95% confidence interval [CI] 88.8%-92.3%), 77% (95% CI 73.9%-80.2%) and 57.2% (95% CI 55.2%-62.8%) at 1-, 5- and 10-years post-procedure, respectively, with a median survival of 12.7 years. Pre-existing chronic kidney disease was strongly associated with poorer long-term survival. For patients under 70 years of age the 1-, 5- and 10-year survival rates were 92.9% (95% CI 90.9%-95.1%), 83.6% (95% CI 80.1%-87.3%) and 73.1% (95% CI 67.4%-79.3%), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The results from this registry study indicate that in Australia and New Zealand, a repeat surgical aortic valve replacement can result in a relatively low mortality rate, serving as a reference point for medical procedures in these regions.