Outcome of Glomerular Disease Manifesting After Vaccination Against Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2.

Introduction Vaccination against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) can upregulate the immune system and may contribute to glomerular disease (GD). Here, we describe a spectrum of GD that manifested following vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19 vaccinations). Material and methods This was a descriptive study of 10 cases enrolled between January 2021 and January 2023. Patients with biopsy-proven GD that manifested following COVID-19 vaccinations were included. Results We found 10 cases of biopsy-proven GD following the COVID-19 vaccination. This included five cases of minimal change disease (MCD), three cases of focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS), one case of C3 glomerulonephritis (C3GN), and one case of IgA nephropathy (IgAN). The pre-existing disease was found in the last two patients (IgAN and C3GN) who got unmasked following vaccination. We did not observe any relation between vaccine type (Covisheld; six cases vs. Covaxin; four cases) and GD. In most cases (8/10 cases, 80.0%), GD developed after a repeat dose (second or booster dose). The onset time following vaccination was typically less than a week, and even less following a repeat dose. Conclusion Post-vaccination GD can be either de novo or a flare-up of a pre-existing one. The onset time following vaccination was typically less than a week for both Covishield and Covaxin.

Disparities in perinatal COVID-19 infection and vaccination.

The COVID-19 pandemic exposed and exacerbated persistent health inequities in perinatal populations, resulting in disparities of maternal and fetal complications. In this narrative review, we present an adapted conceptual framework of perinatal social determinants of health in the setting of the COVID-19 pandemic and use this framework to contextualize the literature regarding disparities in COVID-19 vaccination and infection. We synthesize how elements of the structural context, individual socioeconomic position, and concrete intermediary determinants influence each other and perinatal COVID-19 vaccination and infection, arguing that systemic inequities at each level contribute to observed disparities in perinatal health outcomes. From there, we identify gaps in the literature, propose mechanisms for observed disparities, and conclude with a discussion of strategies to mitigate them.

Perioperative Management of a Patient With Multiple Comorbidities Undergoing Lung Resection for Bronchopulmonary Carcinoid Complicated by SARS-CoV-2 Infection: A Case Report.

We report a case of a high-risk patient with multiple comorbidities who underwent right median lobectomy and lymph node resection due to a carcinoid tumor. The patient's course was complicated by a hospital-acquired severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection and a postoperative chest hematoma requiring urgent thoracotomy. Multidisciplinary and timely management resulted in a favorable patient outcome.

Has the Incidence of Febrile Convulsions in Childhood Changed During the SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic?

Introduction: SARS-CoV-2 infection in children is usually asymptomatic or only mild symptoms are typical. The aim of our study was to assess the incidence of febrile convulsions in our own patients with COVID-19. Patients and Methods: In our retrospective study, we reviewed the data of children who presented at our University Hospital from March 2020 to March 2022 with febrile convulsion. The control group were children admitted to the hospital because of febrile convulsions from January 2018 to January 2020. Results: During the coronavirus pandemic, 51 patients were examined with febrile convulsions. The majority (86.3%) of children had their first febrile convulsion during this period. We diagnosed simple febrile convulsions in 40 cases and complicated ones in 11 cases. The family history of febrile convulsion or epilepsy was present in 12 (23.5%) patients. In addition to febrile convulsion, SARS-CoV-2 infection was confirmed by laboratory testing in 4 cases (7.8%). Three of them had febrile convulsion during the Omicron variant period. Conclusions: During the coronavirus pandemic, the number of children examined because of having febrile convulsions was not higher than in the control period. The coronavirus is unlikely to increase the risk of febrile convulsions.

Exploring the Relationship of SARS-CoV-2 and Uric Acid Levels With a Focus on Gout Patients: A Scoping Review.

Rheumatic diseases are a group of conditions including arthritis and various other conditions that can lead to chronic inflammation within the musculoskeletal system, which can have negative effects on soft tissues, bones, muscles, joints, and connective tissue. One form of arthritis is gout, which is an inflammatory condition in which urate acid crystals build up in joints. Gout is associated with joint swelling, pain, redness, and joint mobility issues. Early diagnosis and treatment are essential to prevent joint degradation and other adverse complications. The condition has been shown to increase the incidence of diseases outside the musculoskeletal system, including the renal and cardiovascular systems. Comorbid conditions associated with gout include but are not limited to type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), hypertension, hyperlipidemia, chronic kidney disease, cardiovascular disease, and heart failure. This systematic review aims to provide insight into the relationship between severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection, uric acid levels, and gout.

Postoperative Outcomes After Emergency Surgery in COVID-19 Patients: An Ambispective Matched Cohort Study.

Purpose There is limited data from the Indian subcontinent regarding the surgical outcomes of coronavirus disease (COVID-19) patients. In this observational study, we aimed to evaluate the postoperative outcomes after emergency surgery in COVID-19 patients compared to concurrent age and gender-matched controls. We also sought to analyze the possible predictors of postoperative mortality in COVID-19 patients. Methods This matched cohort study was conducted in a tertiary care teaching hospital in central India, between 1st July 2021 and 30th June 2022. COVID-19-positive patients undergoing emergency surgery under anesthesia were recruited as cases. Age and gender-matched COVID-19-negative patients undergoing a similar nature of surgery in the same period served as concurrent controls. The cases and controls were compared for the 30-day mortality and perioperative complications. Results The COVID-19-positive surgical cohort had a 12.3 times greater 30-day postoperative overall mortality risk as compared to a matched cohort of patients with a negative COVID-19 test. A positive COVID-19 status was associated with more postoperative complications of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), sepsis, shock, and persistent hyperglycemia. On analysis of predictors of mortality, the presence of preoperative dyspnea, ARDS, American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status (ASA-PS) Class IIIE/IVE, increase in sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score, Quick SOFA>1, higher creatinine, bilirubin, and lower albumin were observed to be associated with increased mortality. Conclusions Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection in patients undergoing emergency surgery is significantly associated with higher postoperative complications and increased 30-day postoperative mortality.

Long-term risks of respiratory diseases in patients infected with SARS-CoV-2: a longitudinal, population-based cohort study.

Background: In the post-pandemic era, growing apprehension exists regarding the potential sequelae of COVID-19. However, the risks of respiratory diseases following SARS-CoV-2 infection have not been comprehensively understood. This study aimed to investigate whether COVID-19 increases the long-term risk of respiratory illness in patients with COVID-19. Methods: In this longitudinal, population-based cohort study, we built three distinct cohorts age 37-73 years using the UK Biobank database; a COVID-19 group diagnosed in medical records between January 30th, 2020 and October 30th, 2022, and two control groups, a contemporary control group and a historical control group, with cutoff dates of October 30th, 2022 and October 30th, 2019, respectively. The follow-up period of all three groups was 2.7 years (the median (IQR) follow-up time was 0.8 years). Respiratory outcomes diagnosed in medical records included common chronic pulmonary diseases (asthma, bronchiectasis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), interstitial lung disease (ILD), pulmonary vascular disease (PVD), and lung cancer. For the data analysis, we calculated hazard ratios (HRs) along with their 95% CIs using Cox regression models, following the application of inverse probability weights (IPTW). Findings: A total of 3 cohorts were included in this study; 112,311 individuals in the COVID-19 group with a mean age (±SDs) of 56.2 (8.1) years, 359,671 in the contemporary control group, and 370,979 in the historical control group. Compared with the contemporary control group, those infected with SARS-CoV-2 exhibited elevated risks for developing respiratory diseases. This includes asthma, with a HR of 1.49 and a 95% CI 1.28-1.74; bronchiectasis (1.30; 1.06-1.61); COPD (1.59; 1.41-1.81); ILD (1.81; 1.38-2.21); PVD (1.59; 1.39-1.82); and lung cancer (1.39; 1.13-1.71). With the severity of the acute phase of COVID-19, the risk of pre-described respiratory outcomes increases progressively. Besides, during the 24-months follow-up, we observed an increasing trend in the risks of asthma and bronchiectasis over time. Additionally, the HR of lung cancer for 0-6 month follow-up was 3.07 (CI 1.73-5.44), and the association of lung cancer with COVID-19 disease disappeared at 6-12 month follow-up (1.06; 0.43-2.64) and at 12-24 months (1.02; 0.45-2.34). Compared to those with one SARS-CoV-2 infection, reinfected patients were at a higher risk of asthma (3.0; 1.32-6.84), COPD (3.07; 1.42-6.65), ILD (3.61; 1.11-11.8), and lung cancer (3.20; 1.59-6.45). Similar findings were noted when comparing with a historical cohort serving as a control group, including asthma (1.31; 1.13-1.52); bronchiectasis (1.53; 1.23-1.89); COPD (1.41; 1.24-1.59); ILD (2.53; 2.05-3.13); PVD (2.30; 1.98-2.66); and lung cancer (2.23; 1.78-2.79). Interpretation: Our research suggests that patients with COVID-19 may have an increased risk of developing respiratory diseases, and the risk increases with the severity of infection and reinfection. Even during the 24-month follow-up, the risk of asthma and bronchiectasis continued to increase. Hence, implementing appropriate follow-up strategies for these individuals is crucial to monitor and manage potential long-term respiratory health issues. Additionally, the increased risk in lung cancer in the COVID-19 individuals was probably due to the diagnostic tests conducted and incidental diagnoses. Funding: The National Natural Science Foundation of China of China Regional Innovation and Development Joint Foundation; National Natural Science Foundation of China; Program for High-level Foreign Expert Introduction of China; Natural Science Foundation for Distinguished Young Scholars of Guangdong Province; Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation; Climbing Program of Introduced Talents and High-level Hospital Construction Project of Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital; VA Clinical Merit and ASGE clinical research funds.

Acute Ischemic Stroke in an Infant With COVID-19 Infection and Delayed Diagnosis of Neurofibromatosis Type 1.

Acute ischemic stroke is an uncommon presentation in the pediatric population as compared to the elderly population. COVID-19 infection is associated with several neurological manifestations, with ischemic strokes being underrecognized. Cerebrovascular events associated with COVID-19 may be due to systemic inflammation and hypercoagulable state. Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) is an inherited multisystem disorder caused by dominant loss-of-function mutations of the tumor-suppressor gene neurofibromin 1, which is located at 17q11.2.1. NF1 is associated with multiple cerebrovascular abnormalities, including internal carotid artery occlusion. A review of the current literature on manifestations of COVID-19 in the pediatric population, including stroke and seizures, is also provided in this case report. A brief review of the literature on neurofibromatosis and the risk of stroke as well as other clinical manifestations is also included as a part of this case report. This case illustrates the importance of recognizing acute and rare complications of neurofibromatosis. Cerebral vasculopathy is an important but underrecognized complication of NF1. Children with neurofibromatosis and hypertension require a thorough and complete neurologic evaluation. This case describes a young infant with a delayed clinical diagnosis of NF1 who was presented with viral manifestations of COVID-19 infection and was diagnosed with a large middle cerebral artery stroke.

COVID-19 mRNA Vaccines: Lessons Learned from the Registrational Trials and Global Vaccination Campaign.

Our understanding of COVID-19 vaccinations and their impact on health and mortality has evolved substantially since the first vaccine rollouts. Published reports from the original randomized phase 3 trials concluded that the COVID-19 mRNA vaccines could greatly reduce COVID-19 symptoms. In the interim, problems with the methods, execution, and reporting of these pivotal trials have emerged. Re-analysis of the Pfizer trial data identified statistically significant increases in serious adverse events (SAEs) in the vaccine group. Numerous SAEs were identified following the Emergency Use Authorization (EUA), including death, cancer, cardiac events, and various autoimmune, hematological, reproductive, and neurological disorders. Furthermore, these products never underwent adequate safety and toxicological testing in accordance with previously established scientific standards. Among the other major topics addressed in this narrative review are the published analyses of serious harms to humans, quality control issues and process-related impurities, mechanisms underlying adverse events (AEs), the immunologic basis for vaccine inefficacy, and concerning mortality trends based on the registrational trial data. The risk-benefit imbalance substantiated by the evidence to date contraindicates further booster injections and suggests that, at a minimum, the mRNA injections should be removed from the childhood immunization program until proper safety and toxicological studies are conducted. Federal agency approval of the COVID-19 mRNA vaccines on a blanket-coverage population-wide basis had no support from an honest assessment of all relevant registrational data and commensurate consideration of risks versus benefits. Given the extensive, well-documented SAEs and unacceptably high harm-to-reward ratio, we urge governments to endorse a global moratorium on the modified mRNA products until all relevant questions pertaining to causality, residual DNA, and aberrant protein production are answered.

ACE2 Receptor-Targeted Inhaled Nanoemulsions Inhibit SARS-CoV-2 and Attenuate Inflammatory Responses.

Three kinds of coronaviruses are highly pathogenic to humans, and two of them mainly infect humans through Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 （ACE2）receptors. Therefore, specifically blocking ACE2 binding at the interface with the receptor-binding domain is promising to achieve both preventive and therapeutic effects of coronaviruses. Alternatively, drug-targeted delivery based on ACE2 receptors can further improve the efficacy and safety of inhalation drugs. Here, these two approaches are innovatively combined by designing a nanoemulsion (NE) drug delivery system (termed NE-AYQ) for inhalation that targets binding to ACE2 receptors. This inhalation-delivered remdesivir nanoemulsion (termed RDSV-NE-AYQ) effectively inhibits the infection of target cells by both wild-type and mutant viruses. The RDSV-NE-AYQ strongly inhibits Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 at two dimensions: they not only block the binding of the virus to host cells at the cell surface but also restrict virus replication intracellularly. Furthermore, in the mouse model of acute lung injury, the inhaled drug delivery system loaded with anti-inflammatory drugs (TPCA-1-NE-AYQ) can significantly alleviate the lung tissue injury of mice. This smart combination provides a new choice for dealing with possible emergencies in the future and for the rapid development of inhaled drugs for the treatment of respiratory diseases.

Vaccine-carditis study: Spanish multicenter registry of inflammatory heart disease after COVID-19 vaccination.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 have been a major scientific and medical achievement in the control of the COVID-19 pandemic. However, very infrequent cases of inflammatory heart disease have been described as adverse events, leading to uncertainty in the scientific community and in the general population. METHODS: The Vaccine-Carditis Registry has included all cases of myocarditis and pericarditis diagnosed within 30 days after COVID-19 vaccination since August 1, 2021 in 29 centers throughout the Spanish territory. The definitions of myocarditis (probable or confirmed) and pericarditis followed the consensus of the Centers for Disease Control and the Clinical Practice Guidelines of the European Society of Cardiology. A comprehensive analysis of clinical characteristics and 3-month evolution is presented. RESULTS: From August 1, 2021, to March 10, 2022, 139 cases of myocarditis or pericarditis were recorded (81.3% male, median age 28 years). Most cases were detected in the 1st week after administration of an mRNA vaccine, the majority after the second dose. The most common presentation was mixed inflammatory disease (myocarditis and pericarditis). 11% had left ventricular systolic dysfunction, 4% had right ventricular systolic dysfunction, and 21% had pericardial effusion. In cardiac magnetic resonance studies, left ventricular inferolateral involvement was the most frequent pattern (58%). More than 90% of cases had a benign clinical course. After a 3-month follow-up, the incidence of adverse events was 12.78% (1.44% mortality). CONCLUSIONS: In our setting, inflammatory heart disease after vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 predominantly affects young men in the 1st week after the second dose of RNA-m vaccine and presents a favorable clinical course in most cases.

The clinical features and impact of SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19 infection in children with Cystic Fibrosis (CF): A Qatari experience.

BACKGROUND: SARS-CoV-2 in children with cystic fibrosis (CF) has been reported to cause mild illness without pre-existing severe lung disease. This review described the clinical presentation and course of COVID-19 infection in children with CF in Qatar. METHODS: The pediatric CF registry of 51 patients in Qatar was reviewed for COVID-19 cases from February 2020 to February 2022. Demographics, vaccination status, symptoms, and course were reviewed. Data were expressed as median, range, frequencies, and percentages. RESULTS: The study included eight patients with CF below 18 years of age infected with COVID-19. The incidence of COVID-19 in children with CF was 15.7%. The median age was 11 (2-18) years. Half of the cohort were males. Seven patients were pancreatic sufficient (I1234V mutation), and one was pancreatic insufficient (3129del4 mutation). The median baseline FEV1 was 91 (78-107%) predicted. None had received CFTR modulators or undergone a lung transplant. Three patients were vaccinated before their infections. Two of them were asymptomatic. Six patients (75%) had a cough and flu-like symptoms. Three patients had a fever. Two patients were hospitalized due to pulmonary exacerbation; both had mild CF-lung disease. None required respiratory support. CONCLUSION: We report a favorable outcome of COVID-19 infection in children with CF, similar to published international studies. Our findings are attributable to the community-dominant milder CFTR mutation, precautionary measures, and causative COVID-19 strain. More longitudinal data are needed to study these factors as potential protective mechanisms.

Genomic Characterization of an Emerging SARS-CoV-2 Variant During the Early Second Wave of the SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic in Maharashtra, India.

Background The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) has led to a global health crisis, with various variants emerging over time. In India, particularly in Maharashtra, a resurgence of cases and distinct transmission patterns have been observed. This study aimed to identify and characterize the circulating SARS-CoV-2 variants during the early second wave in Maharashtra, India. Materials and methods Nasopharyngeal swabs were collected from 24 RT-PCR-positive coronavirus disease of 2019 (COVID-19) cases across four districts of Maharashtra. Whole genome sequencing (WGS) was performed using the ARTIC amplicon sequencing protocol, and the data were analyzed. Results A total of 189 amino-acid mutations were identified across the 24 samples. Compared to the Indian genomes, 44 amino-acid mutations were unique to 24 genomes. Clade 20A was the most prevalent (66.66%), followed by 20B and 21B. The lineage B.1.36 (45.83%) was the most common, followed by B.1.617.1 (16.67%). The D614G mutation was the most frequent spike mutation (95.83%). Four samples from the Amravati district clustered distinctly under Clade 21B with spike mutations E154K in the N-terminal domain (NTD), L452R and E484Q in the receptor-binding domain (RBD) and P681R in proximity to the furin cleavage site. The temporal distribution of samples revealed the presence of Clade 21B in Maharashtra since the 31st of January 2021. Conclusion The study provides valuable insights into the circulating SARS-CoV-2 variants during the early second wave in Maharashtra, highlighting specific clades and mutations. The unique clustering patterns and the high prevalence of immune-escape mutations emphasize the need for continuous monitoring and genomic surveillance.

Navigating the Pandemic: An Exploration of Medical Practitioners' Preparedness, Concerns, Adaptations, and Practices During the COVID-19 Epidemic in India.

Introduction The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) virus, has had profound health and societal impacts, and healthcare providers from diverse backgrounds had to continuously adapt and update to manage patient care, prevent morbidity-mortality, and minimize transmission of the infection. Methodology A cross-sectional survey was conducted among 218 doctors in western India. A structured questionnaire was used to gather data on demographic characteristics, patient consultations, infection prevention practices, COVID-19 diagnosis, management, vaccination attitudes, and healthcare program disruptions. Multistage probability sampling was undertaken to select 161 (64%) private and 57 (26%) public sector doctors from the list of clinics and hospitals reporting COVID-19 cases in the urban municipal corporation area of South Gujarat. Private sector doctors were contacted through the network of public administrative staff and caregivers of their area. They were provided the choice of date, time, and mode (telephonically, face to face, or online) of interview. Descriptive measures of central tendency and variation were calculated. Inferential statistics was applied to test the significance of the difference between sub-groups. For ratio and interval variables, t-test (for two groups) and ANOVA (for more than two groups) were applied while for nominal and ordinal variables, chi-square and appropriate tests were applied. Results The mean age of the 218 doctors included in the study was 43.6 ± 11.1 years while the mean duration of practice was 16.9 ±10.8 years. During the pandemic, patients' consultation frequencies decreased at the clinics while telephonic and residential consultancies increased, which was statistically significant (P=0.000). Social distancing (n= 187; 85%), isolation (n=157; 72%), and consultation reduction (n=65; 30%) were adopted by doctors. Both public and private doctors preferred government-recognized COVID-19 centers for testing (n=167; 76.7%) and reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) as the standard diagnostic test (n=196; 90%). A combination of antipyretics, favipiravir, and antibiotics was used to manage symptomatic cases. Concerns and emotional stress for personal and family safety were prominent among this group of frontline medical doctors (94%). Delivery of healthcare programs for chronic conditions like hypertension and tuberculosis was negatively affected (n=102; 47%). Despite these challenges, doctors managed cases and advised vaccination to control the pandemic. Conclusion This study among over 200 qualified medical practitioners during the pandemic attempts to fill gaps in COVID-19 management, prevention, and safety measures. To the best of our knowledge, this is one of the few studies providing genuine insights into the practice of private doctors with a large sample size. Findings show the established treatment, prophylaxis, and vaccination protocols among private and public practitioners. It highlights the need for adaptable healthcare strategies and collaboration between public and private sectors for managing future global health emergencies.

A Comparison of the Epidemiological Characteristics Between Influenza and COVID-19 Patients: A Retrospective, Observational Cohort Study.

Background and objective It is crucial to make early differentiation between coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and seasonal influenza infections at the time of a patient's presentation to the emergency department (ED). In light of this, this study aimed to identify key epidemiological, initial laboratory, and radiological differences that would enable early recognition during co-circulation. Methods This was a retrospective, observational cohort study. All adult patients presenting to our ED at the Watford General Hospital, UK, with a laboratory-confirmed diagnosis of COVID-19 (2019/20) or influenza (2018/19) infection were included in this study. Demographic, laboratory, and radiological data were collected. Binary logistic regression was employed to determine features associated with COVID-19 infection rather than influenza. Results Chest radiographs suggestive of viral pneumonitis and older age (≥80 years) were associated with increased odds of having COVID-19 [odds ratio (OR): 47.00, 95% confidence interval (CI): 21.63-102.13 and OR: 64.85, 95% CI: 19.96-210.69 respectively]. Low eosinophils (<0.02 x 109/L) were found to increase the odds of COVID-19 (OR: 2.12, 95% CI: 1.44-3.10, p<0.001). Conclusions Gaining awareness about the epidemiological, biological, and radiologic presentation of influenza-like illness can be useful for clinicians in ED to differentiate between COVID-19 and influenza. This study showed that older age, eosinopenia, and radiographic evidence of viral pneumonitis significantly increase the odds of having COVID-19 compared to influenza. Further research is needed to determine if these findings are affected by acquired or natural immunity.

Takotsubo Cardiomyopathy Associated with Acute COVID-19 Pneumonia.

Cardiogenic shock carries a high burden of morbidity and mortality because of inadequate tissue perfusion leading to end-stage multi-organ damage. The initial work-up includes a pertinent and thorough history and physical examination to identify possible cardiac and noncardiac etiologies. The following case describes a patient presenting with symptomatic acute COVID-19 (SARS-CoV-2) pneumonia with initial findings consistent with cardiogenic shock. SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia has been associated with multiple cardiac manifestations including myocarditis, heart failure, myocardial infarction, and Takotsubo cardiomyopathy. This patient was treated with conservative medical management and had complete clinical recovery and normal cardiac angiography weeks after their initial presentation. This clinical scenario highlights the significance of a broad differential and extensive work-up when faced with a patient presenting with cardiogenic shock.

COVID-19 in patients with rheumatological diseases in the Eastern Province of Saudi Arabia.

The severity of the 2019 coronavirus disease (COVID-19) and its effects remain unpredictable. Certain factors, such as obesity, hypertension, and type 2 diabetes mellitus, may increase the severity of the disease. Rheumatology experts suggest that patients with active autoimmune conditions and controlled autoimmune diseases on immunosuppressive therapy may be at higher risk of developing severe COVID-19. In this retrospective observational study, we aimed to examine the patterns of COVID-19 in patients with underlying rheumatological diseases and their association with disease severity and hospital outcomes. A total of 34 patients with underlying rheumatological diseases who tested positive for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) were included between March 2020 and April 2021 at King Fahd Hospital of the University. The study population consisted of 76.47% female and 23.53% male patients, with a mean age ranging from 20 to 40 years. Female gender (p=0.0001) and younger age (p=0.004) were associated with milder disease. The most frequent rheumatological disease was systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) (38.24%), which was associated with a milder infection (p=0.045). Patients treated with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) had a milder disease course (p=0.0037). Hypertension was significantly associated with severe COVID-19 disease (p=0.037). There was no significant relationship between SLE and the need for ICU admission. Patients on hydroxychloroquine and MMF tended to develop milder disease, and there was no association between the severity of the infection and the treatment with steroids.

COVID-19 Infection Rates in Vaccinated and Unvaccinated Inmates: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Background In 2023, breakthrough COVID-19 infections among vaccinated individuals and reinfections in previously infected people have become common. Additionally, infections are due to Omicron subvariants of the virus that behave differently from those at the onset of the pandemic. Understanding how vaccination and natural immunity influence COVID-19 infection rates is crucial, especially in high-density congregate settings such as prisons, to inform public health strategies. Methods We analyzed COVID-19 surveillance data from January to July 2023 across 33 California state prisons, primarily a male population of 96,201 individuals. We computed the incidence rate of new COVID-19 infections among COVID-bivalent-vaccinated and entirely unvaccinated groups (those not having received either the bivalent or monovalent vaccine). Results Our results indicate that the infection rates in the bivalent-vaccinated and entirely unvaccinated groups are 3.24% (95% confidence interval (CI): 3.06-3.42%) and 2.72% (CI: 2.50-2.94%), respectively, with an absolute risk difference of only 0.52%. When the data were filtered for those aged 50 and above, the infection rates were 4.07% (CI: 3.77-4.37%) and 3.1% (CI: 2.46-3.74%), respectively, revealing a mere 0.97% absolute risk difference. Among those aged 65 and above, the infection rates were 6.45% (CI: 5.74-7.16%) and 4.5% (CI: 2.57-6.43%), respectively, with an absolute risk difference of 1.95%. Conclusion We note low infection rates in both the vaccinated and unvaccinated groups, with a small absolute difference between the two across age groups. A combination of monovalent and bivalent vaccines and natural infections likely contributed to immunity and a lower level of infection rates compared to the height of the pandemic. It is possible that a degree of 'herd immunity' has been achieved. Yet, using p<0.05 as the threshold for statistical significance, the bivalent-vaccinated group had a slightly but statistically significantly higher infection rate than the unvaccinated group in the statewide category and the age ≥50 years category. However, in the older age category (≥65 years), there was no significant difference in infection rates between the two groups. This suggests that while the bivalent vaccine might offer protection against severe outcomes, it may not significantly reduce the risk of infections entirely. Further research is needed to understand the reasons behind these findings and to consider other factors, such as underlying health conditions. This study underscores the importance of developing vaccines that target residual COVID-19 infections, especially in regard to evolving COVID-19 variants.

Association of Neutrophil/Lymphocyte Ratio and Neutrophil/Lymphocyte Platelet Ratio With Acute Kidney Injury in Severe COVID-19.

Background Severe disease from COVID-19 was the leading cause of admission to the emergency room and hospitalization during the pandemic in Mexico. Acute kidney injury was one of the most prevalent complications in these patients. The neutrophil/lymphocyte (NL) index and the neutrophil/lymphocyte platelet (NLP) index have previously been described as possible markers associated with complications and mortality in this disease. Objective To determine the association of the NL ratio and the NLP ratio in patients with acute kidney injury secondary to severe COVID-19. Materials and methods This is a case-control study, unpaired, of patients diagnosed with severe COVID-19 who presented or did not present acute kidney injury. On admission to the hospital, the hematological ratios were calculated, and Mann-Whitney U tests and multivariate logistic regression were performed. Results A total of 160 patients were included, and a difference in the NLP ratio (4.2 vs. 3.1, p = 0.001) was observed between patients with and without acute kidney injury. Additionally, the NLP ratio was the main risk variable for acute kidney injury in severe COVID-19, with an odds ratio of 2.5 and a 95% confidence interval of 1.108-5.66. Conclusions The NLP ratio has a moderate association and is a risk factor associated with the presence of acute kidney injury in patients with severe COVID-19.

The Impact of Personal Protective Equipment on Healthcare Workers on COVID-19 Duty in a Tertiary Care Hospital in South India.

Context The proper usage of personal protective equipment (PPE) must be prioritised for health care workers (HCWs), where shortages and prolonged use of personal protective equipment can threaten safety in essential health services. Aims To evaluate the effect of personal protective equipment on the health and well-being of HCWs, physicians, nurses, and technicians on duty for COVID-19 rotational postings. Settings and design This cross-sectional study was done by simple random sampling. Methods and materials This study was conducted at a tertiary care centre in South India to assess the utilisation of personal protective equipment (PPE) during the second wave of COVID-19. A physical questionnaire was distributed to a total of 266 healthcare workers, aged 20 to 50, who had worked for a minimum of three consecutive days between May and August 2021. The objective of the study was to evaluate the effectiveness of PPE use among healthcare workers during the second wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. Statistical analysis The data analysis in this study was conducted using IBM Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 19 (IBM Corp., Armonk, New York). The mean and standard deviation, or median, were used to present continuous variables, while frequency and percentage were used to present categorical variables. Furthermore, the minimum sample size required for this study was calculated to be 246 participants. Results The survey included 266 healthcare workers. The mean+/-SD of age was 28.18+/-5.64 and consisted of females (54.51%) and males (45.48%). The postings were in emergency (13.15%), intensive care unit (30.82%), and ward (56.01%), respectively. The HCWs who used PPE for four to seven days reported more symptoms than those who used it for one to three days. Discomforts experienced while wearing PPE were chest suffocation (49.62%), difficulty in performing intubation (36.09%), difficulty in seeing clearly (68.79%), dizziness (49.62%), excessive sweating (75.56%), micturition desire (52.63%), nausea (42.48%), retro-auricular pain (56.76%), stomach burns (27.44%), and thirst or dry throat (78.57%). The symptoms suffered after doffing were tiredness (69.17%), dry mouth (67.29%), dizziness (43.60%), headache (55.63%), chest suffocation (36.46%), dry skin (57.14%), reduced ability to concentrate (48.12%), dark-coloured urine (55.63%), reduced alertness (42.48%), and stomach burns (28.94%). The first thoughts after doffing were to drink water (68.42%), eat something (36.09%), clean yourself (61.27%), urinate (33.08%), and have some rest (29.32%), respectively. 81 (30.45%). The HCWs suffered skin injuries while wearing gloves. The time for restoring after a shift was 12 hours (37.59%), 24 hours (34.21%), 36 hours (11.65%), and 48 hours (16.59%). Pressure sores were reported on the forehead by 53 (19.92%) participants, the nose by 54 (20.30%), the cheek by 31 (11.65%), and behind the ear by 77 (65.71%) participants. The optimal size of PPE was experienced only by 76 (28.57%) participants, while 73 (27.44%) of them felt tight and 117 (43.98%) felt loose. Conclusions To minimise discomfort while managing infectious diseases, HCWs can adopt several practices like taking regular breaks, ensuring humane working hours, utilising high-quality PPE, and wearing properly fitting gear. By implementing these measures, HCWs can enhance their ability to handle infectious diseases effectively while prioritising their comfort and well-being.