Propensity Score Matching Analysis of Differential Outcomes in Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate vs. Robotic-Assisted Simple Prostatectomy.

Background & Objectives: Patients with bladder outlet obstruction (BOO) due to massive prostate enlargement have several surgical treatment options, such as robot-assisted simple prostatectomy (RASP) and holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP). Postoperative outcomes may differ between those undergoing RASP and HoLEP. RASP has been associated with a lower incidence of transient stress urinary incontinence (SUI), while HoLEP allows for shorter catheterization times. Here, we report on our experience with both surgical modalities. Methods: Data were collected from prospectively maintained databases for 37 RASP patients and 181 HoLEP patients treated from July 2021 to November 2023. To control for selection bias, propensity score matching (PSM) was utilized based on age and prostate size. We compared patients' preoperative, perioperative, and postoperative outcomes both before and after applying PSM. Results: Before the PSM, the median prostate size was significantly lower in the HoLEP group (p < 0.001). The HoLEP group also had significantly shorter operative times (p ≤ 0.001) and lower weights of resected adenoma (p ≤ 0.001). After the PSM of 31 RASP and 31 HoLEP patients, all baseline patient characteristics were comparable. No significant differences were observed in operation time (p = 0.140) or in the weight of resected adenoma (p = 0.394) between the modalities. The median (IQR) length of catheterization was significantly shorter in the HoLEP group (1 [1-4] days) compared to the RASP group (7 [7-8] days), in both pre- and post-matching analyses (p ≤ 0.001 for both), reflecting the standard of practice. In contrast, in both pre- and post-PSM analyses, the average hospital stay was significantly shorter in the RASP cohort, as same-day discharge is standard in our center, whereas the HoLEP cohort required overnight stays due to routine continuous bladder irrigation before discharge (p < 0.001 for all). Notably, the SUI rates and American Urological Association (AUA) symptom scores were comparable at 3 months within both matched and unmatched cohorts (pre-PSM: p = 0.668, p = 0.083; post-PSM: p = 1, p = 0.152, respectively). Conclusions: Our comparative analysis indicates that both RASP and HoLEP yield similar outcomes, including SUI rates, at 3 months. While HoLEP provided shorter durations of postoperative catheterization, RASP offered shorter hospital stays.

Trans-rectovesical pouch urethral-sparing robotic-assisted simple prostatectomy: A case series.

Objective: To detail a novel technique of robotic-assisted simple prostatectomy that makes handling the gland protruding into the bladder neck easier and can preserve the urethra and retain ejaculation function as much as possible. Patients and methods: This is a prospective case series. Clinical data of 17 male patients who had large volume (>80 mL) benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) were enrolled to undergo trans-rectovesical pouch urethral-sparing robotic-assisted simple prostatectomy (usRASP). We adopted the approach through the space between the bladder neck and seminal vesicle to perform a usRASP that can avoid the detrusor skirt and fibrous matrix area of the retropubic prostate. Between the transitional zone and the peripheral zone of the large prostate, the hyperplastic prostatic gland tissue can be enucleated under direct vision while preserving the prostatic urethra and retaining the ejaculatory duct and bladder neck intact. All preoperative, perioperative and postoperative clinical data were collected, and descriptive analysis was performed. Results: The median intravesical prostatic protrusion was 19.3 mm (8.5-32.2). The median operative time was 100 min (75-140), and the median estimated blood loss was 100 mL (10-500). The median time to catheter removal was 7 days (5-7), with a median postoperative hospital stay of 2 days (2-4). After at least 6-month follow-up, the median maximum urine flow rate and postvoid residual volume were 40.1 mL/s (12.7-52.4) and 15 mL (5-23), respectively; the median International Prostate Symptom Score and Quality of Life score were 0 (0-6.3) and 1 (0-3), respectively; and the median total prostate-specific antigen was 0.84 ng/mL (0.15-1.01). All patients successfully underwent usRASP. Fifty-eight percent of patients with normal ejaculation function before surgery can still retain normal ejaculation function. Conclusion: We described a new approach to performing usRASP. This new method remarkably improved the voiding function, maintained antegrade ejaculation and did not increase the post-operative complications.

Pre-and Post-Prostatectomy Detrusor Wall Thickness and the Symptom Profile in Patients with Benign Prostatic Enlargement: A Prospective Review.

INTRODUCTION: The urinary bladder undergoes morphological and functional changes in patients with symptomatic benign prostatic enlargement (BPE). These detrusor changes reflect chronically increased intravesical pressure as a result of outlet obstruction. This study aims to determine the relationship between the Pre- and Post-op detrusor wall thickness (DWT), international prostate symptom score (IPSS), and duration of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) in patients who had open simple prostatectomy (OSP). METHOD: This was a prospective study of a cohort of patients who had OSP for symptomatic BPE. The IPSS and symptom duration for each patient were noted. Each patient also had an abdominal ultrasound scan with a measurement of their DWT. Retropubic OSP was done for each patient. The detrusor wall thickness was also measured 12 weeks after the prostatectomy. RESULTS: Fifty-two patients completed the study; the mean age was 66.37 ± 8.09 years. The median pre-operative IPSS was 28 (IQR = 13.75), and the median duration of symptoms was 24 months (IQR = 37 months). The mean pre-operative DWT was 4.41 ± 1.38mm, while the mean post-operative DWT was 2.16 ± 0.98mm. The preoperative IPSS (p = 0.833) and duration of symptoms (p = 0.375) did not significantly correlate with the pre-operative DWT. There was a significant reduction in the mean DWT (p < 0.001) and IPSS (p < 0.001) following prostatectomy. CONCLUSION: DWT appears not to be significantly influenced by the severity or duration of LUTS. However, it reduced significantly following OSP with corresponding improvement in urinary symptoms.

INTRODUCTION: La vessie subit des changements morphologiques et fonctionnels chez les patients présentant une hyperplasie bénigne de la prostate (HBP) symptomatique. Ces modifications du détrusor reflètent une pression intravésicale chroniquement augmentée en raison de l'obstruction de la sortie. Cette étude vise à déterminer la relation entre l'épaisseur de la paroi du détrusor (EPD) avant et après l'opération, le score international des symptômes prostatiques (IPSS) et la durée des symptômes des voies urinaires inférieures (LUTS) chez les patients ayant subi une prostatectomie simple ouverte (OSP). MÉTHODE: Il s'agissait d'une étude prospective d'une cohorte de patients ayant subi une OSP pour une HBP symptomatique. L'IPSS et la durée des symptômes pour chaque patient ont été notés. Chaque patient a également subi une échographie abdominale avec mesure de leur EPD. Une OSP rétropubienne a été réalisée pour chaque patient. L'épaisseur de la paroi du détrusor a également été mesurée 12 semaines après la prostatectomie. RÉSULTATS: Cinquante-deux patients ont terminé l'étude ; l'âge moyen était de 66,37 ± 8,09 ans. L'IPSS médian préopératoire était de 28 (IQR = 13,75), et la durée médiane des symptômes était de 24 mois (IQR = 37 mois). L'EPD moyenne préopératoire était de 4,41 ± 1,38 mm, tandis que l'EPD moyenne postopératoire était de 2,16 ± 0,98 mm. L'IPSS préopératoire (p = 0,833) et la durée des symptômes (p = 0,375) n'ont pas significativement corrélé avec l'EPD préopératoire. Il y a eu une réduction significative de l'EPD moyenne (p < 0,001) et de l'IPSS (p < 0,001) après la prostatectomie. CONCLUSION: L'EPD ne semble pas être significativement influencée par la gravité ou la durée des LUTS. Cependant, elle a considérablement diminué après l'OSP avec une amélioration correspondante des symptômes urinaires. MOTS-CLÉS: Hyperplasie bénigne de la prostate, Épaisseur de la paroi du détrusor, Score international des symptômes prostatiques, Prostatectomie simple ouverte.

Retzius-sparing Robot-assisted Simple Prostatectomy: Perioperative and Short-term Functional Outcomes Assessed via Validated Questionnaires.

Background and objective: Several surgical procedures have been reported for treatment of male patients with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) secondary to large benign outlet obstruction (BOO). The diffusion of robotic surgery offers the possibility to perform open simple prostatectomy (SP) with a minimally-invasive approach. Our aim was to report outcomes of the Retzius-sparing robot-assisted SP (RS-RASP) technique. Methods: This was a single centre, prospective study. Patients with LUTS secondary to BOO and a prostate volume of >100 ml underwent RS-RASP performed with a da Vinci surgical system in four-arm configuration for a transperitoneal approach. Data for intraoperative and perioperative complications were collected. Functional outcomes were assessed via validated patient questionnaires. Univariable and multivariable regression analyses were used to identify predictors of complications and achievement of a trifecta composite outcome. Key findings and limitations: The median patient age was 69 yr and the median prostate volume was 150 ml. The median operative time was 175 min, with estimated blood loss of 350 ml. The median in-hospital stay and median catheterisation time were 3 d and 9 d, respectively. Within 90 d, the incidence of complications was 3% for grade 1, 19% for grade 2, and 2% for grade 3 complications. At 7-mo follow-up, statistically significant improvements in International Prostate Symptom Scores (total score and quality of life), International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Urinary Incontinence Short Form (ICIQ-UI SF) scores, and the maximum flow rate were observed (all p < 0.0001). According to ICIQ-UI SF scores, 20%, 6%, and 3% of the patients had slight, moderate, or severe urinary incontinence (UI), respectively. Urgency UI was experienced by 14% of the patients and stress UI by 10%. Most of the patients with UI reported leakage of a small amount of urine and they did not wear pads. Conclusions: RS-RASP was associated with good perioperative outcomes and a low prevalence of high-grade complications. Significant LUTS relief was achieved, but some patients experienced slight urgency or stress UI at short-term follow-up. Patient summary: We explored a surgical technique called Retzius-sparing robot-assisted simple prostatectomy to treat men with bothersome urinary symptoms caused by a large prostate. The technique led to good results, with minimal bleeding and few complications during surgery. This surgery could be a beneficial choice for patients with stubborn urinary symptoms and a large prostate gland.

Safety and complications of continuation of aspirin therapy in patients undergoing robot-assisted laparoscopic simple prostatectomy.

To evaluate the safety and feasibility of continued perioperative aspirin at the time of robotic assisted simple prostatectomy (RASP). We performed a retrospective review of our IRB approved institutional database of patients who underwent RASP between 2013 and 2022. Comparative groups included patients taking aspirin in the perioperative period and those not taking aspirin pre-operatively. The primary outcome was any post-operative bleeding related complication using the modified Clavien-Dindo classification. Secondary outcomes included the identification of risk factors for increased blood loss in the entire study population, operative time, and blood transfusion requirement. 143 patients underwent RASP of which 55 (38.5%) patients continued perioperative aspirin therapy and 88 (61.5%) patients did not. Baseline demographics were similar between groups. Patients taking perioperative aspirin had a higher rate of hypertension (74.5% vs 58.0%, p = 0.04) and other cardiovascular disease (30.9% vs 11.4%, p = 0.007). Postoperative complications were similar between the groups (Clavien-Dindo ≥ 3; p = 0.43). Median blood loss (150 cc vs 150 cc, p = 0.38), percentage drop in hemoglobin (13.4 vs 13.2, p = 0.94) and blood transfusion rate (3.6 vs 1.1, p = 0.56) were also similar between groups. The median blood loss was 150 ml for the whole study population. On regression analysis, neither aspirin nor any other variable was associated with increased blood loss (> 150 ml). Aspirin can be safely continued perioperatively in patients undergoing RASP without any risk of bleeding related complications, blood loss, or increased transfusion rate.

Efficacy and safety of photoselective vaporization of the prostate using the Greenlight XPS 180W laser and simple prostatectomy for high-volume prostate hypertrophy: a comparative analysis.

Introduction: This study aimed to compare the safety and efficacy of treatment using simple prostatectomy (SP) and using photoselective vaporization of the prostate (PVP) with a 180W GreenLight XPS laser in patients with high-volume prostate hypertrophy. Material and methods: The study included 120 patients with LUTS symptoms caused by prostatic enlargement of more than 80 ml; 79 patients were treated with SP, while 41 were treated with PVP. The analysis included subjective the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) and Quality of Life (QoL), and objective (Qmax), (Qave), and post-void residual volume (PVR) parameters before treatment and at an average of 38 months after surgical treatment. Early and late adverse effects and length of hospitalisation were assessed. Complication reports were performed according to the modified Clavien-Dindo system. Results: The analysis independently showed the effectiveness of both methods. Subjective parameters (IPSS, QoL), showed no significant differences. Patients treated with SP scored slightly better on objective parameters (Qmax, Qave, and PVR). Analysis of adverse effects and hospitalisation time were more favourable after PVP. Conclusions: SP and PVP were found to be comparable and highly effective in treating benign prostatic hyperplasia in terms of IPSS and QoL. Patients treated with the SP method obtained slightly better results of objective parameters such as Qmax, Qave, and PVR. Compared with SP, PVP has a more favourable safety profile.

Successful Robot-Assisted Simple Prostatectomy Years After a Prostate Artery Embolization: A Case Report and Review of the Literature.

Simple prostatectomy (SP) can be utilized for patients with large prostates with lower urinary tract symptoms. Prostate artery embolization (PAE) does not have robust clinical evidence to support its use in treating urinary symptoms; however, it is an effective treatment for refractory hematuria from a prostatic source. There have been limited papers regarding preoperative PAE prior to SP. However, there are no papers regarding the feasibility of delayed SP after PAE. We present, to our knowledge, the first paper demonstrating a successful robot-assisted SP years after a PAE in a patient with a 380g prostate with recurrent refractory gross hematuria.

Implementation of single-port robotic urologic surgery: experience at a large academic center.

The Single-Port (SP) robotic system is increasingly being implemented in the United States, allowing for several minimally invasive urologic procedures to be performed. The present study aims to describe our single-center experience since the adoption of the SP platform. We retrospectively collected and analyzed consecutive SP cases performed at a major teaching hospital in the Midwest (Rush University Medical Center) from December 2020 to December 2023. Demographic variables were collected. Surgical and pathological outcomes were analyzed in the overall cohort and for each type of procedure. The study timeframe was divided into two periods to assess the evolution of SP technical features over time. In total, 160 procedures were performed, with robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) being the most common (49.4%). Overall, 54.4% of the procedures were extraperitoneal, with a significantly higher adoption of this approach in the second half of the study period (30% vs 74.3%, p < 0.001). A "plus one" assistant port was adopted in 38.1% of cases, with a shift towards a "pure" single-port surgery in the most recent procedures (21.1% vs 76.7%, p < 0.001). The median LOS was 33.5 h (30-48), with a rate of any grade and CD ≥ 3 postoperative complications of 9.4% and 2.5%, respectively, and a 30-day readmission rate of 1.9%. SP robotic surgery can be safely and effectively implemented for various urologic procedures. With increasing experience, the SP platform allows shifting away from transperitoneal procedures, potentially minimizing postoperative pain, and shortening hospital stay and postoperative recovery.

Single-port robot-assisted simple prostatectomy: techniques and outcomes.

PURPOSE: To describe the surgical techniques and to analyse the outcomes of single-port robot-assisted simple prostatectomy (SP RASP) procedure for the surgical treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). METHODS: Three databases (PubMed®, Web of Science™, and Scopus®) were queried to identify studies reporting on the technical aspects and outcomes of SP RASP. Different combinations of keywords were used, according to a free-text protocol, to identify retrospective and prospective studies, both comparative and non-comparative, systematic reviews (SR) and meta-analysis (MA) describing surgical techniques for SP RASP and the associated surgical and functional outcomes. RESULTS: The transvesical approach represents the most common approach for SP RASP. A decrease in terms of estimated blood loss was observed when SP RASP was compared to open simple prostatectomy (OSP) and multi-port (MP) RASP. Furthermore, this technique allowed for a shorter length of hospital stay (LoS) and a lower post-operative complication rate, compared to OSP. Post-operative subjective and objective functional outcomes are satisfying and comparable to OSP and MP RASP. CONCLUSION: SP RASP represents a safe and feasible approach for the surgical management of BPH. It provides comparable surgical and functional outcomes to MP RASP, enabling for minimal invasiveness, enhanced recovery, and potential for improving patient care.

Comparing prostatic artery embolization to surgical and minimally invasive procedures for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: To summarize current evidence to report a comparative systematic review and meta-analysis of prostatic artery embolization (PAE) with transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) and open simple prostatectomy (OSP) for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). METHODS: A systematic literature search was performed to identify studies published from inception until August 2021. The search terms used were (prostate embolization OR prostatic embolization) AND (prostatic hyperplasia OR prostatic obstruction) as well as the abbreviations of PAE and BPH. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and the Risk of Bias in Non-randomized Studies-of Interventions (ROBINS-I) tool for observational studies. Random-effects meta-analysis was performed using Revman 5.4. RESULTS: Seven studies were included with 810 patients: five RCTs and one observational study compared PAE with TURP, and one observational study compared PAE with OSP. The included studies had considerable risk of bias concerns. TURP and OSP were associated with more statistically significant improvements in urodynamic measures and BPH symptoms compared to PAE. However, PAE seems to significantly improve erectile dysfunction compared to OSP and improve other outcome measures compared to TURP, although not significantly. PAE appeared to reduce adverse events and report more minor complications compared with TURP and OSP, but it is unclear whether PAE is more effective in the long-term. CONCLUSION: PAE is an emerging treatment option for patients with symptomatic BPH who cannot undergo surgery or have undergone failed medical therapy. Overall, PAE groups reported fewer adverse events. Future ongoing and longer-term studies are needed to provide better insight into the benefit of PAE compared to other treatment options.

Laparoscopic prostatectomy with complete urethral reconstruction for sexual active BPH patients.

OBJECTIVE: To describe our technique of transvesical laparoscopic simple prostatectomy (LSP) plus complete urethral reconstruction(CUR). MATERIAL AND METHODS: From May 2019 to May 2021, 28 BPH patients with prostate volumes > 80 ml and the requirement to preserve the ejaculatory function (EF) received LSP plus CUR. Baseline demographics, pathology data, perioperative and postoperative complications, and functional outcomes were assessed. Data were analyzed with the Wilcoxon test. RESULTS: The median prostate volume was 106 ml. All patients successfully underwent LSP with no intraoperative complications or conversions to open surgery. The median operative time was 146 min. A total of five Clavien-Dindo Grade1-2 postoperative complications were noted, including infection, prolonged urine leakage and cardiac arrhythmia. No patient reported postoperative urgent or stress urinary incontinence. Functional outcomes at one-year follow-up demonstrated significant improvement from baseline with median IPSS and Qmax (p both < 0.001). Compared with baseline, no significant difference was observed in IIEF and MSHQ-EjD-SF at 6 and 12 months postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: Our data support transperitoneal-transvesical LSP plus CUR as a safe and effective surgical technique for treating BPH with large prostate adenoma, regardless of the volume of the median lobe, especially for patients requiring to preserve antegrade ejaculation.

Single-port Transvesical Robot-Assisted Simple Prostatectomy: Surgical Technique and Clinical Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Surgical management of large prostatic adenomas can be performed via open, endoscopic, or robotic approaches. A low-profile single-port (SP) robot was built to work in confined areas (ie, the bladder) and regionalize surgery. OBJECTIVE: To describe the novel SP transvesical (TV) robot-assisted simple prostatectomy (RASP) and report clinical outcomes. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: SP TV RASP cases were performed in an academic hospital by two surgeons from 2019 to 2023. A total of 117 cases were performed, and data from patients with at least 12 mo of follow-up were analyzed. The inclusion criterion was severe obstructive urinary symptoms or catheter-dependent urinary retention due to large prostates with volume >80 ml. SURGICAL PROCEDURE: The procedure consisted of two main steps through a single 3-cm suprapubic incision: first, enucleation of the adenoma, and second, a 360° bladder mucosal flap reconstruction. No drains or continuous bladder irrigation was used routinely. MEASUREMENTS: Intraoperative parameters, pre- and postoperative uroflowmetry, and 1-yr clinical outcomes were assessed. We used descriptive statistics to analyze the data. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: All procedures were completed successfully without additional ports or conversions. The median console time and estimated blood loss were 107 min and 100 ml, respectively. Transfusion rate was 0%. Intraoperative complications included two suspected air emboli attributed to high insufflation pressures. There were no major postoperative complications. In total, 95.8% were discharged within the first 24 h, with a median length of stay and pain score of 5 h and 3/10, respectively. There was persistent improvement in the median International Prostate Symptom Score and flow rate after 1 yr. The median Sexual Score Inventory for Men score was 20 at 12 mo. Our study is limited by its retrospective nature and cohort size. CONCLUSIONS: SP TV RASP is a feasible alternative for the management of severe benign prostatic hyperplasia that promotes fast recovery and demonstrates 1-yr improvement in urinary function. PATIENT SUMMARY: Single-port transvesical robot-assisted simple prostatectomy is a minimally invasive alternative for the treatment of large benign prostatic growth. A single robotic arm goes through a small incision in the skin and bladder to extract the obstructive prostatic tissue. Afterward, reconstruction of the area is done to decrease bleeding and improve postoperative symptoms. We found that patients recover quickly and have excellent clinical results with a low risk of complications.

Comparison of the efficacy and safety of robotic-assisted simple prostatectomy and laser enucleation of prostate for large benign prostatic hyperplasia.

Laser enucleation of the prostate (LEP) and robotic-assisted simple prostatectomy (RASP) are two main treatment methods for large benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), but the superiority between these two methods in treating large BPH is currently unclear. This study aims to conduct a meta-analysis to compare the efficacy and the safety of LEP and RASP in treating large BPH. We systematically searched the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases for studies that compared safety and efficacy outcomes of both LEP and RASP. Review Manager 5.3 was used for the meta-analysis. Six studies with a total of 1235 patients were included in the analysis. Resected adenoma weight was similar in LEP than RASP group. Operative time [mean difference (MD) - 67.96; 95% confidence interval [CI] - 131.66 to - 4.25; p = 0.04], catheterization time (MD -6.31; 95% CI - 9.44 to - 3.18; p < 0.0001), and length of stay (MD - 2.44; 95% CI - 3.55 to - 1.34; p < 0.0001) were lower in LEP. The International Prostate Symptom Score, maximum urinary flow rate, prostate-specific antigen, and post-void residual urine volume were also comparable between two groups. Furthermore, LEP demonstrated lesser hemoglobin decrease (MD - 0.50; 95% CI - 0.96 to - 0.05; p = 0.03), lower blood transfusion rate [odd ratio (OR) 0.23, 95% CI 0.08-0.66; p = 0.006], and lower rate of Clavien-Dindo Grade ≥ 3 complications (OR 0.435, 95% CI 0.189-0.998; p = 0.049). Finally, there was no significant difference in overall complications between two groups. Current evidence shows that LEP offers favorable perioperative outcomes compared with RASP. However, there was no conclusive evidence that LEP was advantaged in terms of efficacy outcomes.

Effect of Perioperative Tranexamic Acid on Blood Loss following Open Simple Prostatectomy: A Prospective Review in Nigerian Men.

BACKGROUND: Haemorrhage is a common complication following open simple prostatectomy and patients may sometimes require a blood transfusion. Tranexamic acid has been shown to reduce blood loss following transurethral resection of the prostate and open radical prostatectomy. This study evaluated the effect of perioperative intravenous administration of tranexamic acid on blood loss and blood transfusion rates in patients who had OSP for benign prostatic enlargement. METHODOLOGY: This was a comparative study of patients with documented prostate glands 60g and above scheduled for OSP. Initial hematocrit was done a day before surgery. The patients were randomized into a tranexamic acid group, which received perioperative intravenous tranexamic acid and the no-TXA group which received placebo (0.9% saline). All patients had open simple retropubic prostatectomy. Final post-operative hematocrit was assessed 72 hours after surgery, and blood loss was calculated using the modified Gross formula (actual blood loss = estimated blood volume x change in hematocrit / mean hematocrit). The transfusion rate was documented. RESULTS: Fifty-six patients participated in this study and were randomized into a tranexamic acid group and no-tranexamic acid group. The mean age of patients in the tranexamic acid group was 66.07 ±7.08 years and was comparable to the no- tranexamic acid group which was 66.50 ± 8.80 years (P = 0.842). The median total blood loss was lower in the tranexamic acid group (502mls, IQR 613) compared to the no-tranexamic acid group (801mls, IQR 1069). The difference in the median blood loss between the two groups was 299mls (U 275, P 0.055). The rate of blood transfusion was lower in the tranexamic acid group (6 patients, 21%) compared to the no tranexamic acid group (11 patients, 39%), (P = 0.146). There was no difference in complication rates between the two groups. CONCLUSION: The use of tranexamic acid in patients undergoing open simple prostatectomy showed a trend towards reduced intraoperative blood loss and less need no tranexamic for blood transfusion. This is of clinical significance, especially in elderly patients with low cardiovascular reserve.

CONTEXTE: L'hémorragie est une complication courante après une prostatectomie simple ouverte et les patients doivent parfois recevoir une transfusion sanguine. Il a été démontré que l'acide tranexamique réduit la perte de sang après une résection transurétrale de la prostate et une prostatectomie radicale ouverte. Cette étude a évalué l'effet de l'administration intraveineuse périopératoire d'acide tranexamique sur les pertes sanguines et les taux de transfusion sanguine chez des patients ayant subi une PSO pour hypertrophie bénigne de la prostate. MÉTHODOLOGIE: Il s'agissait d'une étude comparative de patients dont la prostate de 60 g et plus était documentée et qui devaient subir une PSO. L'hématocrite de base a été effectué un jour avant la chirurgie. Les patients ont été répartis aléatoirement dans le groupe acide tranexamique, qui a reçu de l'acide tranexamique periopératoire par voie intraveineuse, et dans le groupe sans TXA, qui a reçu un placebo. Tous les patients ont subi une prostatectomie rétropubienne simple ouverte. L'hématocrite postopératoire a été évalué, et la perte de sang calculée à l'aide de la formule de Gross modifiée. Le taux de transfusion a été documenté. RÉSULTATS: Cinquante-six patients ont participé à cette étude et ont été randomisés entre le groupe avec acide tranexamique et le groupe sans acide tranexamique. L'âge moyen des patients du groupe acide tranexamique était de 66,07 ±7,08 ans et était comparable à celui du groupe sans acide tranexamique qui était de 66,50 ± 8,80 ans (P =0,842). La perte sanguine totale médiane était plus faible dans le groupe avec acide tranexamique (502 ml, IQR 613) que dans le groupe sans acide tranexamique (801 ml, IQR 1069). La différence de la perte de sang médiane entre les deux groupes était de 299 ml (U 275, P 0,055). Le taux de transfusion sanguine était inférieur dans le groupe acide tranexamique (6 patients, 21%) par rapport au groupe sans acide tranexamique (11 patients, 39%), (P =0,146). Il n'y avait pas de différence dans les taux de complication entre les deux groupes. CONCLUSION: L'utilisation de l'acide tranexamique chez les patients subissant une prostatectomie simple ouverte a montré une tendance à la réduction de la perte de sang peropératoire et un besoin moindre de transfusion sanguine. Mots clés: Hypertrophie bénigne de la prostate, Prostatectomie simple ouverte, Hémorragie, Acide tranexamique.

Laser enucleation of the prostate (LEP) vs. simple prostatectomy: an analysis of hospital charges and comparison of practice trends.

PURPOSE: Laser enucleation of the prostate (LEP) and simple prostatectomy (SP) are surgical treatment options for large gland Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia. While multiple studies compare clinical outcomes of these procedures, there are limited data available comparing hospital charges in the United States. Here, we present current practice trends and a hospital charge analysis on a national level using an annual insurance claims data repository. METHODS: The Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project National Inpatient Sample and Nationwide Ambulatory Surgery Sample databases for 2018 were queried. CPT and ICD-10PCS codes identified patients undergoing LEP or SP, who were then compared for practice setting, total hospital charges, and payor. Laser type for LEP and surgical approach for SP could not be differentiated. RESULTS: The median hospital charge of 5782 LEPs and 973 SPs is $26,689 and $51,250 (p < 0.001), respectively. LEP independently predicts a decreased hospital charge of $16,464 (p < 0.001) per case. Medicare is the primary payor for both procedures. More LEP procedures are completed in the outpatient setting (87.8%) vs. SPs (5.7%, p < 0.001). Median length of stay is longer for SP (LEP: 0, IQR: 0; SP: 3, IQR: 2-4; p < 0.001). In the Western region, LEP is least commonly performed (184, p < 0.001), most expensive ($43,960; p < 0.001), and has longer length of stay (2, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: LEP should be considered a cost-effective alternative to SP. Regions of the U.S. that perform more LEPs have shorter length of stay and lower hospital charges associated with the procedure.

Initial Experience of Robot-Assisted Simple Prostatectomy with Hugo Robot-Assisted Surgery System: Step-by-Step Description of Two Different Techniques.

Introduction: There are only a few clinical data on nononcologic procedures performed with the new Hugo™ robot-assisted surgery (RAS) system. Robot-assisted simple prostatectomy (RASP) is a minimally invasive treatment option for benign prostatic hyperplasia, and it demonstrated equal early functional and better perioperative outcomes as compared with open simple prostatectomy. In this article, we reported the first large series of RASP performed with Hugo RAS system. Methods: This Supplementary Video S1 is a step-by-step description of two different techniques for RASP. We analyzed the data of 20 consecutive patients who underwent RASP at OLV Hospital (Belgium) between February 2022 and March 2023. Patients baseline characteristics, perioperative and pathologic, and 1-month postoperative outcomes were reported, using the median (interquartile range [IQR]) and frequencies, as appropriate. Results: Median age (IQR) and preoperative prostate specific antigen (PSA) were 72 (67-76) years, and 7.7 (5.0-13.4) ng/mL, respectively. A total of 11 patients experienced an episode of preoperative acute urinary retention, and 8 men had an indwelling bladder catheter at the time of the surgery. No intraoperative complication occurred, and there was no need for conversion to open surgery. Median operative and console time were 165 (121-180) and 125 (101-148) minutes. On the first postoperative day the urethral catheter was removed in 80% of the patients. Median length of stay was 3 (3-4) days. Three patients had minor postoperative complications. On final pathology report, median prostate volume was 120 (101-154) g. On postoperative uroflowmetry, median Qmax and postvoid residual were 16 (13-26) mL/s and 15 (0-34) mL, respectively. Conclusions: This series represents the first report of surgical outcomes of RASP executed with Hugo RAS system. Awaiting study with longer follow-up, our study suggests that Hugo RAS has multiple applications, and it can ensure optimal outcomes in nononcologic procedures.

Robotic simple prostatectomy vs HOLEP, a 'multi single-center' experiences comparison.

Introduction: The aim of this study was to compare peri-operative and mid-term outcomes of patients who underwent robot-assisted simple prostatectomy (RASP) vs holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HOLEP). RASP and HOLEP are the treatments of choice for men with symptomatic benign prostatic obstruction (BPO) and a prostate ≥80 g, achieving comparable short and mid-term efficacy. No randomized controlled studies have proved the superiority of one technique over the other. Material and methods: The prospectively maintained databases of the participating institutions were queried for patients with a prostate volume (PV) ≥80 g, who underwent surgery for BPO between 2011 and 2021. The study population was divided into two subgroups based on surgical approach. Demographics, baseline characteristics, and 12 months outcomes were compared between groups: χ2 and Student t-tests were used for categorical and continuous variables, respectively. The Trifecta composite outcome (post-operative Q-max >15 ml/sec, International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) <8 and absence of complications) was used to define surgical quality and the two groups were compared accordingly. Logistic regression analyses investigated predictors of Trifecta achievement. Results: We included 97 patients with comparable pre-operative features (all p >0.30): 43 underwent RASP, 54 HOLEP. Median PV was 102 g (IQR 89-120) and Q-max was 7.2 ml/s (IQR 5.4-9.0). The Trifecta rate was 43% overall, higher in the RASP subgroup (56% vs 33%; p = 0.02). The endoscopic approach was its only independent predictor (OR 0.5; 95% CI 0.28-0.88; p = 0.016). Conclusions: At univariable regression analysis, surgical approach was the only independent predictor of Trifecta achievement, which was significantly higher in the RASP group compared to HOLEP.

Urethra-Sparing Robot-Assisted Simple Prostatectomy for Postoperative Antegrade Ejaculation.

BACKGROUND: We report a comparative analysis of extraperitoneal urethra-sparing robot-assisted simple prostatectomy (EUS-RASP) versus robot-assisted simple prostatectomy (RASP) using the Freyer approach for patients with a large prostate volume greater than 80 mL. METHODS: A total of 32 patients underwent EUS-RASP, and 30 underwent RASP from April 2018 to November 2021. All the perioperative data and 6-month follow-up data were collected prospectively. We retrospectively evaluated baseline characteristics and functional outcomes, including International Prostate Symptom Scores (IPSSs) and quality of life (QOL), maximum flow rate, and post-void residual volume, between the two groups. Sexual function was analyzed in the EUS-RASP group. RESULTS: The patients undergoing EUS-RASP and RASP had comparable baseline characteristics and functional outcomes. The EUS-RASP group showed a shorter operative time (123.4 ± 15.2 min vs. 133.7 ± 21.4 min, p = 0.034), length of hospital stay (2.9 ± 1.5 days vs. 4.6 ± 1.5 days, p = 0.001), and catheterization time (2.4 ± 1.7 days vs. 8.1 ± 2.4 days, p < 0.001). A total of 14/32 (43.8%) patients reported normal preoperative ejaculatory function in the EUS-RASP group, and 11/14 (78.6%) maintained antegrade ejaculation postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: Extraperitoneal urethra-sparing RASP is an effective and feasible procedure that can improve voiding function and allow for the maintenance of ejaculatory function in patients with large prostates.