Exploring Associations of Somatic Symptom Disorder with Personality Dysfunction and Specific Maladaptive Traits.

INTRODUCTION: According to ICD-11, personality disorders (PDs) are defined by the severity of self and interpersonal dysfunction in terms of personality functioning (PF) and an optional assessment of specific maladaptive personality trait expressions. Also, somatoform disorders are replaced by somatic symptom disorder (SSD). This study examines associations using the novel diagnostic criteria of SSD in an unselected primary care sample, PF, and maladaptive traits in patients with and without SSD. METHODS: An anonymized cross-sectional study was conducted. A questionnaire including SSD-12 (Somatic Symptom Disorder B Criteria Scale-12) and PHQ-15 (Patient Health Questionnaire-15), LPFS-BF 2.0 (Level of Personality Functioning Scale - Brief Form) and PID-5BF+M (Modified Personality Inventory for DSM-5 - Brief Form Plus) was used. A bifactor (S-1) model was calculated with PF (reference for general factor) and personality traits (specific factors) to estimate associations between PF, specific maladaptive personality traits, and SSD. Differences in personality scales between SSD and non-SSD patients were calculated with the Mann-Whitney U test. RESULTS: A total of 624 patients in six general practices participated (mean age 47 years; 60.4% female). SSD-12 and PHQ-15, respectively, showed significant associations with PF (γ = 0.51; γ = 0.48; p < 0.001), negative affectivity (γ = 0.50; γ = 0.38, p < 0.001) and psychoticism (γ = 0.29; γ = 0.28; p < 0.010). Besides, SSD-12 was significantly associated with disinhibition (γ = -0.38; p < 0.010) and anankastia (γ = -0.16; p < 0.010). Patients with SSD showed significantly impaired PF and maladaptive traits in all scales (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Impaired PF explains moderate to large amounts of the SSD symptoms and maladaptive personality traits negative affectivity, psychoticism, disinhibition, and anankastia show specific associations beyond PF. An in-depth understanding of these relations might be helpful to improve doctor-patient communication and treatment in SSD.

Latent profile analysis of biopsychosocial measures in older patients with (un)explained persistent somatic symptoms.

Patients with persistent somatic symptoms (PSS) often receive either somatic or psychiatric care, depending on whether symptoms are respectively medically explained (MES) or unexplained (MUS). This separation may not be as clinically relevant as previously assumed; however, research on data-driven subgroups within cohorts of older patients with PSS is not available. Our goal is to identify more clinically relevant homogeneous subgroups beyond the distinction of MUS and MES among older patients with PSS by using a data-driven approach. We performed two Latent Profile Analyses (LPAs), one focused on 6 somatic health measures, the other on 6 psychosocial measures, using data from a case-control study with participants (>60 years) with MUS (N = 118) or MES (N = 154), recruited from the general public, general practices and secondary healthcare. We identified two somatic-health based (strong, vulnerable) and four mental-health based (strong, vulnerable, lonely, non-acceptance) profiles. We found no statistically significant overlap between the somatic - and mental health profiles (κ = 0.019). Health related quality of life negatively associated with the mentally - and somatically vulnerable profiles. We conclude that singular focus on MUS/MES distinction in the care for older PSS patients may lead to undertreatment of the most vulnerable patients. Integrated care is recommended when treating persistent somatic symptoms in later life, regardless of the (un)explained origin of the symptoms.

Somatization in Polypharmacy: Hiding in Plain Sight.

Polypharmacy and somatic symptom disorder (SSD) are common conditions clinicians see every day in practice. Polypharmacy is easy to identify and causation seems to be straightforward. However, SSD may not be so obvious and may be an underlying cause of the polypharmacy that may be more difficult to identify. Identifying SSD as a potential psychiatric cause for polypharmacy and understanding that adding more medications will not adequately resolve the patient's symptoms is important to prevent polypharmacy from being exacerbated.

Facilitating and hindering factors in the treatment of persistent somatic symptoms in migrants: A scoping review.

OBJECTIVE: To identify facilitating and hindering factors in the treatment of persistent somatic symptoms (PSS) in migrants in psychiatry and other health care settings in Western countries. METHODS: A scoping literature review was conducted by searching PubMed and Embase, using combinations of search terms related to the treatment of PSS in migrants. Studies outside of the scope of current guidelines or limited to specific underlying diseases such as post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) or consequences of torture were excluded. Two independent reviewers verified that the studies met the inclusion criteria, assessed the quality of the studies, and identified and categorized facilitating and hindering treatment factors. RESULTS: Of the 347 unique citations identified in the initial the search, 18 studies met the inclusion criteria. These studies showed a wide variety in study design, interventions used, measurement instruments, and study quality. Common treatment adaptations related to: (a) translation and interpretation, (b) adaptation to lower educational levels, (c) culture-sensitive therapists and materials, (d) gender roles, (e) removal of practical barriers, (f) supportive treatment, and (g) nonverbal therapy forms. The most commonly mentioned influencing factors of treatment success related to: (a) body and experience-oriented treatment elements, (b) translation and communication, (c) cultural sensitivity, (d) group interaction, and (e) caring for one's own health. CONCLUSION: This review provides an overview of available research on treatment adaptations for PSS in migratory background patients. Potential facilitating and hindering factors for treatment success that may be useful for healthcare providers treating PSS in patients with a migratory background were identified.

Neuropsychological features of somatic symptom disorder and depression/anxiety in Taiwan: An analysis based on the comorbidity status.

Individuals with somatic symptom disorder (SSD) often have comorbid depression or anxiety, but whether SSD is associated with specific neuropsychological functions has yet to be fully examined. We analyzed which neuropsychological features are more closely associated with SSD, anxiety, and depression. In this case-control study, we recruited 140 individuals with SSD, 104 individuals with affective disorders without SSD, and 159 healthy controls in Taiwan. We collected DSM-5 diagnoses, questionnaire scores, and performance on eight tasks from the Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery (CANTAB) for each participant. Several CANTAB tasks involving attention, executive function, and social cognition showed significant group differences. In the adjusted analysis, the tasks significantly associated with SSD were the Match to Sample Visual Search (MTS) and the Emotion Recognition Task (ERT). Among the questionnaires, the Cognitions about Body and Health Questionnaire showed the most significant associations with the tasks, specifically with Rapid Visual Information Processing, MTS, Paired Associates Learning, Spatial Working Memory, Intra-Extra Dimensional Set Shift, and ERT. We conclude that the MTS and ERT tasks show significant relationships with both SSD diagnosis and related questionnaires. These tasks primarily involve selective attention and negative emotion regulation.

Childhood maltreatment and transdiagnostic connectivity of the default-mode network: The importance of duration of exposure.

Childhood maltreatment (CM) has been demonstrated to be associated with changes in resting-state functional connectivity of the default-mode network (DMN) across various mental disorders. Growing evidence regarding severity of CM is available but transdiagnostic research considering the role of both severity and duration of CM for DMN connectivity at rest is still scarce. We recruited a sample of participants with varying levels of CM suffering from three disorders in which a history of CM is frequently found, namely, post-traumatic stress disorder, major depressive disorder, or somatic symptom disorder, as well as healthy volunteers to examine DMN connectivity in a transdiagnostic sample. We expected to find changes in inter-network connectivity of the DMN related to higher self-reported levels of CM severity and duration. Resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging scans of 128 participants were analyzed focusing on regions of interest (ROI-to-ROI approach) and whole-brain Seed-to-Voxel analyses with retrospectively assessed CM as predictor in a regression model. Changes in connectivity between nodes of the DMN and the visual network were identified to be associated with CM duration but not severity. CM duration showed associations with increased connectivity of the precuneus and visual regions, as well as sensory-motor regions. The observed changes in connectivity could be interpreted as an impairment of information transfer between the transmodal DMN and unimodal visual and sensory-motor regions with impairment increasing with duration of exposure to CM.

Somatic symptom disorder symptoms in individuals at risk for heart failure: A cluster analysis with cross-sectional data from a population-based cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: Identifying whether experienced symptom burden in individuals with medical predisposition indicates somatic symptom disorder (SSD) is challenging, given the high overlap in the phenomenology of symptoms within this group. This study aimed to enhance understanding SSD in individuals at risk for heart failure. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Cross-sectional data from the Hamburg City Health Study was analyzed including randomly selected individuals from the general population of Hamburg, Germany recruited from February 2016 to November 2018. SSD symptoms assessed with the Somatic Symptom Scale-8 and the Somatic Symptom Disorder-12 scale were categorized by applying cluster analysis including 412 individuals having at least 5% risk for heart failure-related hospitalization within the next ten years. Clusters were compared for biomedical and psychological factors using ANOVA and chi-square tests. Linear regressions, adjusting for sociodemographic, biomedical, and psychological factors, explored associations between clusters with general practitioner visits and quality of life. RESULTS: Three clusters emerged: none (n = 215; 43% female), moderate (n = 151; 48% female), and severe (n = 46; 54% female) SSD symptom burden. The SSS-8 mean sum scores were 3.4 (SD = 2.7) for no, 6.4 (SD = 3.4) for moderate, and 12.4 (SD = 3.7) for severe SSD symptom burden. The SSD-12 mean sum scores were 3.1 (SD = 2.6) for no, 12.2 (SD = 4.2) for moderate, and 23.5 (SD = 6.7) for severe SSD symptom burden. Higher SSD symptom burden correlated with biomedical factors (having diabetes: p = .005 and dyspnea: p ≤ .001) and increased psychological burden (depression severity: p ≤ .001; anxiety severity: p ≤ .001), irrespective of heart failure risk (p = .202). Increased SSD symptoms were associated with more general practitioner visits (ß = 0.172; p = .002) and decreased physical quality of life (ß = -0.417; p ≤ .001). CONCLUSION: Biomedical factors appear relevant in characterizing individuals at risk for heart failure, while psychological factors affect SSD symptom experience. Understanding SSD symptom diversity and addressing subgroup needs could prove beneficial.

Integrated care model for patients with functional somatic symptom disorder - a co-produced stakeholder exploration with recommendations for best practice.

BACKGROUND: Functional somatic symptoms (FFS) and bodily distress disorders are highly prevalent across all medical settings. Services for these patients are dispersed across the health care system with minimal conceptual and operational integration, and patients do not currently access therapeutic offers in significant numbers due to a mismatch between their and professionals' understanding of the nature of the symptoms. New service models are urgently needed to address patients' needs and to align with advances in aetiological evidence and diagnostic classification systems to overcome the body-mind dichotomy. METHOD: A panel of clinical experts from different clinical services involved in providing aspects of health care for patients with functional symptoms reviewed the current care provision. This review and the results from a focus group exploration of patients with lived experience of functional symptoms were explored by the multidisciplinary expert group, and the conclusions are summarised as recommendations for best practice. RESULTS: The mapping exercise and multidisciplinary expert consultation revealed five themes for service improvement and pathway development: time/access, communication, barrier-free care, choice and governance. Service users identified four meta-themes for best practice recommendations: focus on healthcare professional communication and listening skills as well as professional attributes and knowledge base to help patients being both believed and understood in order to accept their condition; systemic and care pathway issues such as stronger emphasis on primary care as the first point of contact for patients, resources to reduce the length of the patient journey from initial assessment to diagnosis and treatment. CONCLUSION: We propose a novel, integrated care pathway for patients with 'functional somatic disorder', which delivers care according to and working with patients' explanatory beliefs. The therapeutic model should operate based upon an understanding of the embodied nature of patient's complaints and provide flexible access points to the care pathway.

[Psychocorporal approach to functional somatic disorders]. / Prise en charge psychocorporelle des troubles somatiques fonctionnels.

Functional somatic disorders (FSD) are common conditions that result in a significant deterioration of the quality of life. Their origin is multifactorial and poorly understood, and their management is often inadequately defined. Medications typically show limited effectiveness, while mind-body approaches play a central role, guided by three key principles: establishing an empathetic, respectful, and sincere doctor-patient relationship; promoting regular and gradual physical activity; and implementing cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT). Special attention must be devoted to establishing a trustworthy relationship between the physician and the patient. Recognizing the reality and severity of symptoms and providing a positive diagnosis as well as an explanatory model to account for them rationally are fundamental aspects of patient management. Cognitive and behavioral maintenance factors should be investigated and constitute therapeutic targets. Cognitive factors include focused attention on body functioning and catastrophizing. Patients frequently display avoidance behaviors, particularly in relation to physical exertion, and it is crucial to motivate them to reintroduce gradual physical activity customized to their abilities. This approach has demonstrated efficacy in improving fatigue, pain, and the physical and mental quality of life for patients with FSD. Among psychotherapeutic approaches, the benefit of CBT is well-established. The combination of gradual physical activity and CBT appears to be complementary. Other mind-body approaches such as mindfulness meditation might help although their level of evidence is weaker. Given the prevalence of FSD in the general population, it seems necessary for all physicians to be trained in managing this condition.

Phenomenology of Somatization in Immigrants: An Idealtypical Approach.

INTRODUCTION: Somatization in immigrants is frequent but standard studies do not differentiate between various forms of somatization. In this qualitative study, we used an idealtypical approach with the aim of phenomenologically differentiating between different forms of somatization in immigrants. METHODS: The clinical description of the ideal types was based on seven levels: medical examination; description of somatization symptoms; the patients' own interpretation of their somatic experience; concomitant psychopathological phenomena; genetic understanding; clinician's interpretation; and course and treatment. RESULTS: Five different ideal typologies of patients emerged: anxious hypochondriasis, somatization with cultural features playing a pathogenetic role, culturally shaped somatization (through pathoplastic effects), somatization as part of adjustment reactions due to migratory living difficulties, and somatization as post-traumatic reaction. CONCLUSION: These differences are useful to highlight the complex interrelationship between socioeconomic, migratory, cultural, and value factors in the construction of somatization among immigrants. Implications for research methodology, nosology, clinical management, and organization of medical facilities are also discussed.

An integrated mental health video consultations model for patients with somatic symptom disorder in primary care: The randomized VISION pilot trial.

OBJECTIVE: Symptoms of somatic symptom disorder (SSD) are one of the most common reasons for consultations in primary care. However, specialized psychological services are mostly unavailable. This pilot trial aimed to determine the feasibility, acceptability, and safety of the integrated mental health video consultations VISION model for patients with SSD in primary care. METHODS: We conducted a parallel group, randomized controlled pilot trial involving fifty-one patients with SSD from ten primary care practices in Germany, who we randomized to the VISION model or enhanced treatment-as-usual (eTAU). The VISION model comprised five video consultations which featured diagnostic clarification, psychoeducation (acknowledging and legitimizing of symptoms), and brief psychological therapy. eTAU included training primary care practice teams on the DSM-5 concept of SSD and on current guideline recommendations for its treatment in primary care. We assessed feasibility as the primary outcome at 6-months, measuring efficiency of recruitment, intervention acceptability, and safety. RESULTS: Recruitment was efficient reflected in an overall recruitment yield (number randomized per number screened) of 55% (51/92) and a consent rate (number randomized per number eligible) of 94% (51/54). Acceptability of the intervention was high with 98% (123/125) of the video consultations conducted as planned. No serious adverse events were reported in either group. CONCLUSION: An integrated mental health video consultations VISION model for patients with SSD presenting to primary care is feasible, acceptable, and safe. Potential clinical effectiveness of the model should be evaluated in confirmatory trial implementing the multifaceted approach tailored to the individual patient with SSD directly into primary care practice. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial protocol was registered at German Clinical Trials Register (number: DRKS00026075, https://www.drks.de).

Changes in interoceptive accuracy related to emotional interference in somatic symptom disorder.

OBJECTIVE: The somatic symptom disorder (SSD) is characterized by one or more distressing or disabling somatic symptoms accompanied by an excessive amount of time, energy and emotion related to the symptoms. These manifestations of SSD have been linked to alterations in perception and appraisal of bodily signals. We hypothesized that SSD patients would exhibit changes in interoceptive accuracy (IA), particularly when emotional processing is involved. METHODS: Twenty-three patients with SSD and 20 healthy controls were recruited. IA was assessed using the heartbeat perception task. The task was performed in the absence of stimuli as well as in the presence of emotional interference, i.e., photographs of faces with an emotional expression. IA were examined for correlation with measures related to their somatic symptoms, including resting-state heart rate variability (HRV). RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the absolute values of IA between patients with SSD and healthy controls, regardless of the condition. However, the degree of difference in IA without emotional interference and with neutral facial interference was greater in patients with SSD than in healthy controls (p = 0.039). The IA of patients with SSD also showed a significant correlation with low-frequency HRV (p = 0.004) and high-frequency HRV (p = 0.007). CONCLUSION: SSD patients showed more significant changes in IA when neutral facial interference was given. These results suggest that bodily awareness is more affected by emotionally ambiguous stimuli in SSD patients than in healthy controls.

Association of categorical diagnoses and psychopathologies with quality of life in patients with depression, anxiety, and somatic symptoms: A cross-sectional study.

OBJECTIVE: Major depressive disorder (MDD), anxiety disorders, and somatic symptom disorder (SSD) are associated with quality of life (QoL) reduction. This cross-sectional study investigated the relationship between these conditions as categorical diagnoses and related psychopathologies with QoL, recognizing their frequent overlap. METHODS: We recruited a total of 403 clinical patients and healthy individuals, administering diagnostic interviews based on the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition. QoL and psychopathologies were assessed using the WHO Quality of Life-BREF (WHOQOL-BREF) and several self-administered questionnaires, respectively. Multiple linear regression analyses examined the associations between psychiatric diagnoses, psychopathologies, and QoL. RESULTS: SSD and MDD were independently associated with impaired global (ß = -0.318 and - 0.287) and all QoL domains (ß = -0.307, -0.150, -0.125, and - 0.133, in physical, psychological, social, and environmental domains respectively for SSD; ß = -0.278, -0.344, -0.275, and - 0.268 for MDD). The Beck Depression Inventory-II score showed pervasive associations with QoL (ß = -0.390, -0.408, -0.685, -0.463, and - 0.420, in global, physical, psychological, social, and environmental domains). The Patient Health Questionnaire-15 and Health Anxiety Questionnaire scores were associated with global (ß = -0.168 and - 0.181) and physical (ß = -0.293 and - 0.121) QoL domain, while the Cognitions About Body and Health Questionnaire score was only associated with environmental QoL domain (ß = -0.157). CONCLUSION: SSD and MDD were independently associated with QoL impairment. Depressive symptoms were associated with all QoL domains, whereas somatic symptom burden and health anxiety primarily affected the physical QoL domain. Clinicians should consider concomitant psychopathologies when managing patients with depression, anxiety, or somatic symptoms.

Psychological flexibility in somatic symptom and related disorders: A case control study.

A key diagnostic criterion of Somatic Symptom and related Disorders (SSD) comprises significant distress and excessive time-and-energy consuming thoughts, feelings, and behavior pertaining to somatic symptoms. This diagnostic criterion is lacking in central sensitivity syndromes (CSS), such as fibromyalgia, irritable bowel syndrome, and chronic fatigue syndrome. This strong emphasis on disturbed psychological processing of somatic symptoms, suggests that psychological flexibility is low in SDD. Psychological flexibility is defined as the ability to approach difficult or challenging internal states (thoughts, emotions, and bodily sensations) in a non-judgmental, mindful way, and being committed to pursue one's values. To clarify the potential significance of psychological flexibility in SSD, we examined its levels in 154 people referred to specialized treatment for SDD, as compared to reference groups from the general population encompassing 597 people with CSS and 1422 people without SSD or CSS (controls). Mean levels of psychological flexibility (adjusted for demographic covariates) were lowest for SSD and highest for controls (F = 154.5, p < 0.001, pη2 = 0.13). Percentages of people with low psychological flexibility (<0.8 SD below the mean of controls) were: SSD 74%, CSS 42%, controls 21%. In SSD, higher psychological flexibility was associated with better mental health (ß = 0.56, p < 0.001), but interaction analysis rejected that psychological flexibility preserved health when having more severe somatic symptoms (ß ≤ 0.08, p ≥ 0.10). The results indicate that lower psychological flexibility is a prevalent problem in SSD that is associated with lower mental health. This suggests that it is worthwhile to take account of psychological flexibility in SSD in screening, monitoring, and therapy.

Psychobehavioral B-Criteria of Somatic Symptom Disorder Are Associated with Somatic Symptom Reporting in a Large Sample of Psychosomatic Outpatients.

Introduction: Somatic symptom disorder (SSD) as introduced by the DSM-5 is characterized by chronic somatic symptoms not fully explained by underlying pathology and accompanied by psychological factors, the diagnostic B-criteria. These cognitive, affective, and behavioral disturbances are related to increased attention to somatic symptoms. However, there is a lack of empirical evidence regarding the association between the B-criteria and high symptom reporting in clinical settings. Methods: This 12-year retrospective, cross-sectional, observational study examined 6,491 patients from a German psychosomatic outpatient center. The somatoform subscale of HEALTH-49 was used to evaluate somatic symptom reporting. Excessive health concerns and other potential criteria associated with symptom reporting were determined using the ICD-10-Symptom Rating and other HEALTH-49 subscales. Results: Regression analysis revealed that the established B-criteria for SSD were the strongest factors associated with somatic symptom reporting, with a standardized beta-coefficient of ß = 0.31 (R2 = 0.428, df = 24, F = 187.886). Other psychobehavioral factors were clearly less associated with somatic symptom reporting, such as depressive symptoms with ß = 0.15 and impaired activity and participation with ß = 0.12. Sociodemographic factors, such as age (ß = 0.16) and gender (ß = 0.12), were also independently associated with somatic symptom reporting. Conclusion: This study provides evidence for the concept of SSD related to specific B-criteria associated with somatic symptom reporting, based on a large patient sample. These results point to an important role of psychological symptomatology in patients with somatic symptoms. The findings also suggest that additional factors contribute to the reporting of somatic symptoms. Our results may inform future diagnostic criteria for SSD.

This scientific study examines the association between psychobehavioral factors and somatic symptom reporting in a large sample of psychosomatic outpatients. We investigated the association of established and possible additional psychobehavioral criteria for somatic symptom disorder (SSD) as defined in the DSM-V. The study included 6,491 patients from a psychosomatic outpatient center over a 12-year period. The participants completed self-report questionnaires to assess somatic symptom reporting and psychobehavioral factors. The results showed that the B-criteria of SSD were associated with somatic symptom reporting, indicating the validity of these criteria in clinical practice. Other psychobehavioral factors, such as depressive symptoms and impaired activity and participation, as well as sociodemographic factors such as age and gender were also associated with somatic symptom reporting but to a much lesser extent. This study has limitations, including its retrospective and cross-sectional design, reliance on self-report measures, and the need for further research using longitudinal data and clinician-rated assessments to complement self-report data. However, our research highlights the importance of psychological symptomatology in individuals who report somatic symptoms. These findings may inform future diagnostic criteria and treatment approaches for individuals with SSD and improve treatment and patient outcomes.

Autistic Traits and Somatic Symptom Disorders: What Is the Link?

Alterations in sensory processing, a key component of autism spectrum disorder (ASD), have recently attracted increasing attention as they result in peculiar responses to sensory stimuli, possibly representing a risk factor for the development of somatic symptom disorder (SSD). Contextually, other features also associated with ASD, such as alexithymia, camouflaging and altered verbal, and non-verbal communication, have been suggested to represent risk factors for the occurrence and worsening of somatic symptomatology. The aim of this work was to review the available literature about the association between SSD and the autism spectrum. The results highlighted not only a higher prevalence of autistic features in patients suffering from SSD and a higher prevalence of reported somatic symptomatology in subjects with ASD but also how ASD subjects with co-occurrent somatic symptoms exhibit more severe autism-linked symptomatology. From the paper reviewed also emerged many shared features between the two conditions, such as alexithymia, altered sensitivity to sensory stimuli, cognitive inflexibility, intolerance of uncertainty, and an increased risk of experiencing stressful life events, which may provide an explanation for the correlation reported. Even though studies on the topic are still scant, the evidence reported suggests the importance of further assessing the correlation between the two disorders.

[Health anxiety: Another epidemic to prepare for]. / L'anxiété centrée sur la santé : une autre épidémie à laquelle il faut se préparer.

Health anxiety (HA) is a frequent problem (up to 20% of consultants in the context of secondary care) responsible for decreased well-being, disability, somatic and psychiatric complications, which contributes to high healthcare expenditures at the population level. It is likely, if not definitely established, that the prevalence of ACS is increasing, and this can partly be explained by the growing medicalization of society in general, the appetite of Media for health issues, and the uncontrolled use of the Internet (which can lead certain vulnerable subjects to cyberchondria). The pandemic of COVID-19 could have contributed to it, at least by the significant increase in the overall level of psychological distress in the population it has caused, although this has not formally been demonstrated to date. The diagnosis of ACS is easy, as soon as its assessment is considered as a mandatory part of any medical consultation. Certain intuitive attitudes of doctors, such as reassurance, prove to be iatrogenic for the patient with HA. The management of HA can be facilitated by an acculturation of physicians to cognitive conceptions of anxiety in general and HA in particular. HA is effectively treatable by certain psychotherapy and in the first place cognitive and behavioral therapies (CBT), but the availability of trained therapists and accessible at a lower cost is sorely lacking, particularly in France.

Reliability and Validity of the Korean Version of the Somatic Symptom Disorder-B Criteria Scale in a Clinical Population.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to develop and validate the Korean version of the Somatic Symptom Disorder-B Criteria Scale (SSD-12) in outpatients at a psychiatric clinic and assess its diagnostic accuracy. METHODS: A total of 207 patients completed SSD-12. For the diagnostic accuracy of SSD-12, the somatic symptom disorder (SSD) section of the structured clinical interview for DSM-5 disorders-research version (SCID-5-RV) was used. The SSD-12 construct and concurrent validity were assessed by examining the correlations with Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7), Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), PHQ-15, 5-level EQ-5D version (EQ-5D-5L), and World Health Organization Quality of Life Brief Version (WHOQOL-BREF). RESULTS: The SSD-12 had excellent internal consistency (Cronbach α=0.90). Confirmatory factor analysis revealed good fit indices for a general factor model (comparative fit index [CFI]=0.92, Tucker-Lewis index [TLI]=0.88, root mean square error of approximation [RMSEA]=0.10; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.08-0.11) and a three-factor model (CFI=0.94, TLI=0.91, RMSEA=0.08; 95% CI, 0.07-0.10). The total SSD-12 score was significantly correlated with anxiety (GAD-7: r=0.53, p<0.001), depression (PHQ-9: r=0.52, p<0.001), physical symptom burden (PHQ-15: r=0.36, p<0.001), and quality of life (EQ-5D-5L: r=-0.40, p<0.001; WHOQOL-BREF: r=-0.51, p<0.001). SSD-12 demonstrated good accuracy (area under the curve=0.75, standard error=0.04; 95% CI, 0.68-0.82) with an optimal cut-off of 29. CONCLUSION: The Korean SSD-12 demonstrates reliability and validity for diagnosing SSD in clinical setting.