Surgical Site Infection After Polymethyl Methacrylate Pedicle Screw Augmentation in Osteoporotic Spinal Vertebrae: A Series of 537 Cases.

BACKGROUND: Retrospective observational study of prospectively collected outcomes. OBJECTIVE: The use of transpedicular screws augmented with polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) is an alternative for patients with osteoporotic vertebrae. To investigate whether using PMMA-augmented screws in patients undergoing elective instrumented spinal fusion (ISF) is correlated with an increased risk of infection and the long-term survival of these spinal implants after surgical site infection (SSI). METHODS: We studied 537 consecutive patients who underwent ISF at some point within a 9-year period, involving a total of 2930 PMMA-augmented screws. Patients were classified into groups: (1) those whose infection was cured with irrigation, surgical debridement, and antibiotic treatment; (2) those whose infection was cured by hardware removal or replacement; and (3) those in whom treatment failed. RESULTS: Twenty eight of the 537 patients (5.2%) developed SSI after ISF. An SSI developed after primary surgery in 19 patients (4.6%) and after revision surgery in 9 (7.25%). Eleven patients (39.3%) were infected with gram-positive bacteria, 7 (25%) with gram-negative bacteria, and 10 (35.7%) with multiple pathogens. By 2 years after surgery, infection had been cured in 23 patients (82.15%). Although there were no statistically significant differences in infection incidence between preoperative diagnoses (P = 0.178), the need to remove hardware for infection control was almost 80% lower in patients with degenerative disease. All screws were safely explanted while vertebral integrity was maintained. PMMA was not removed, and no recementing was done for new screws. CONCLUSIONS: The success rate for treatment of deep infection after cemented spinal arthrodesis is high. Infection rate findings and the most commonly found pathogens do not differ between cemented and noncemented fusion. It does not appear that the use of PMMA in cementing vertebrae plays a pivotal role in the development of SSIs.

Therapeutic intervention for iatrogenic thoracolumbar pseudomeningocele using ultrasound-guided aspiration and ultrasound-assisted epidural blood patch - A case report.

Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leakage causing a pseudomeningocele is a well-recognized complication after spine surgery. It presents as a recurrence of low-back pain, radiculopathy, subcutaneous swelling, symptoms of intracranial hypotension, and delayed myelopathy. Definitive surgical repair is needed if not resolved spontaneously or with minimally invasive measures like lumbar subarachnoid drainage and an epidural blood patch (EBP). We report a case of iatrogenic thoracic pseudomeningocele, successfully treated with dual therapeutic intervention (CSF aspiration and EBP) using an ultrasound. This minimally-invasive intervention helped our patient resolve symptoms, avoid radiation, and make it cost-effective by avoiding surgical intervention and polypharmacy of general anesthesia.

Lung injury in patients age 75 years and older with the use of polymethylmethacrylate fenestrated pedicle screws.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Pulmonary complications in patients age 75 years and older who undergo spinal fusion may have catastrophic consequences. The use of augmentation techniques with polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) have been associated with pulmonary damage. The use of fenestrated pedicle screws augmented with PMMA may increase the risk of lung injury in this population. PURPOSE: To investigate whether the use of PMMA-augmented screws is correlated with increased lung injury in patients undergoing instrumented lumbar spinal fusion. STUDY DESIGN: A nonrandomized, prospective, case-controlled clinical study was carried out. PATIENT SAMPLE: We included 50 consecutive patients: 25 classifieds as patients who required PMMA-augmented screws in lumbar spinal fusion, and 25 classifieds as control participants because they underwent uncemented instrumented spinal fusion. OUTCOME MEASURES: We compare the incidence of the event, lung damage, in both groups by measuring a series of parameters: arterial blood gas, transesophageal echocardiography, urinary desmosine, and chest radiograph. The epidemiological parameters analyzed were age, sex, body mass index, status as a smoker, and number of cement leaks. METHODS: Changes in pulmonary damage markers were described in both groups of patients, comparing postsurgery values with baseline values. In control participants, each change was evaluated for the total number of patients. All changes are indicated in this report by mean differences for quantitative variables and by differing proportions for qualitative variables, with 95% confidence intervals provided for all values. RESULTS: There was an increase in postinstrumentation PaO2 (arterial partial pressure of oxygen) in both groups, probably related to the use of mechanical ventilation and recruitment maneuvers. Even though the group that required augmentation had lower baseline levels, the difference between groups was not statistically significant. On transesophageal echocardiographs, we observed scattered small, snowflake-like emboli, and bright echo signals appeared in the right atrium during PMMA injection. Signal density was constant but gradually faded away when PMMA injection ended. No participants in the group without augmentation had radiological complications. Overall, desmosine levels increased in both groups, and the rise was similar in both. There was a slight average increase in urine desmosine levels after instrumentation and progressively continues to rise until 24 hours after instrumentation, with a subsequent decrease at 72 hours. Comparing the two groups, we found no statistically significant differences at any time. CONCLUSIONS: We were not able to identify a significant difference in urine desmosine levels associated with the augmentation of with fenestrated pedicle screws with PMMA. Despite comparing patients age 75 years or older with a younger group, we found no clinical, analytical, or gasometric data indicating lung damage in patients who had augmentation.

Anterior cage migration during spine surgery: An unusual and severe complication.

We report the case of an anterior cage migration that was incarcerated between the abdominal aorta and inferior vena cava. Removal of the cage was favored over conservative treatment because of potential migration and vessel injury.