Extraction and Reimplantation of a Subcutaneous Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator: Two Cases and a Review of the Literature.

For several years, implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) have been the cornerstone for the prevention of sudden cardiac death. However, the weakness of traditional transvenous ICD systems lies in the intravascular lead, which is prone to issues such as conductor fracture, insulation abrasion, risk of dislodgement, and infection. With the new generation of subcutaneous defibrillators, these risks are far less common. To date, the frequency of lead fracture is very low, and infection is much rarer. The management of these complications requires complete lead extraction. Traction is the reference procedure, sometimes necessitating the use of a dilating sheath. These techniques remain straightforward to perform without significant risk of procedural complications. Nevertheless, they must be carried out by an expert in cardiac pacing. We report here two cases with indications for lead extraction: one for lead dysfunction and the other for an infection related to a replacement procedure. The management approaches will be described, followed by a review of the literature.

SMART Pass automatic deactivation of subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillators.

BACKGROUND: The SMART Pass algorithm for subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator prevents inappropriate shocks due to oversensing. The mechanisms and significance of SMART Pass deactivation remain unclear. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to assess whether SMART Pass deactivation is associated with inappropriate shocks and to elucidate the underlying mechanism. METHODS: We retrospectively investigated 115 patients who underwent subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator implantation between 2016 and 2021. SMART Pass deactivation and inappropriate shocks during follow-up were assessed. The QRS amplitudes of the subcutaneous (S-ECG) and 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) at the time of implantation (pre) and SMART Pass deactivation (post) were measured. The patients were divided into the SP-ON group with SMART Pass consistently on and the SP-OFF group with the experience of SMART Pass deactivation. RESULTS: Three of 12 patients in the SP-OFF group experienced inappropriate shocks during a median follow-up of 1094 (interquartile range, 887-1502) days compared with 4 of 87 patients in the SP-ON group. Pre- and post-S-ECG QRS amplitudes were significantly lower in the SP-OFF group than in the SP-ON group (both P < .05), despite similar 12-lead ECG QRS amplitude in both groups. A significant temporary drop in the QRS amplitude of the S-ECG led to SMART Pass deactivation (pre-QRS amplitude vs amplitude at deactivation, P = .015; 95% CI, 0.3-1.9). CONCLUSION: The rate of inappropriate shocks was numerically higher after SMART Pass deactivation. A low QRS amplitude in S-ECG was a potential risk factor for SMART Pass deactivation. Careful follow-up and suitable management are required for managing patients with risks of SMART Pass deactivation.

A manual synchronous low energy shock impedance as a predictor of successful defibrillation testing during subcutaneous ICD implantation.

BACKGROUND: Guidelines recommend defibrillation testing (DFT) during subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (S-ICD) implantation. Implant position, patient characteristics and device factors, such as shock impedance, influence defibrillation success. To evaluate the shock impedance, a manual synchronous 10J shock (low energy synchronous shock [LESS]) can be delivered, without the need to induce ventricular fibrillation (VF). OBJECTIVE: To compare LESS and DFT impedance values and to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of LESS impedance for predicting a successful DFT during S-ICD implantation. METHODS: Consecutive S-ICD implantations were included. Shock impedances were compared by paired t-tests. Univariate analysis was performed to investigate factors associated with successful DFT. A prediction model of successful DFT based on LESS impedance was assessed by logistic regression. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, area under the ROC curve and the Hosmer-Lemeshow tests were used to evaluate the accuracy of LESS impedance. RESULTS: Sixty patients were included (52 ± 14 years; 69% male). LESS and DFT impedance values were highly correlated (r2 = 0.97, p < .01). Patients with a failed first shock had higher body mass index (BMI) (30 ± 3 vs. 25.7 ± 4.3, p = .014), higher mean LESS (120 ± 35Ω vs. 86. ± 23Ω, p = .0013) and DFT impedance (122 ± 33Ω vs. 87 ± 24Ω, p = .0013). ROC analysis showed that LESS impedance had a good diagnostic performance in predicting a successful conversion test (AUC 84% [95% CI: 0.72-0.92]) with a cutoff value of <94Ω to identify a successful DFT (sensitivity 71%, specificity 73%). CONCLUSION: LESS impedance values without the need to induce VF can intraoperatively predict a successful DFT.

Wireless Device Therapy in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Using the Combination of a Leadless Pacemaker and a Subcutaneous Defibrillator: A Report with 2-year Follow-up of Two Patients.

Cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) are essential tools in cardiology for tackling rhythm disturbances and have come a long way over the last decades. Technology is shifting toward leadless devices that spare the complications and limitations of traditional intravascular CIEDs. Herein, we report the simultaneous implantation of a leadless pacemaker (LP) and a subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (S-ICD) in two patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, as well as their 2-year follow-up results, while explaining the preventive measures taken to steer around unwanted device interaction. Implantation of an S-ICD with an LP is reserved for unique cases but is a feasible approach when there is a contraindication for intravascular CIED implantation. Furthermore, this technique may be used in younger patients with cardiomyopathies in whom multiple generator replacements are expected, along with their known adverse effects.

Subcutaneous versus transvenous implantable cardioverter defibrillator in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background: A subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (S-ICD) is an alternative to a transvenous implantable cardio defibrillator (TV-ICD). An S-ICD reduces the risk of transvenous lead placement. However, further research is required to determine how S-ICDs affect patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). In this study, we investigated the comparative efficacy and safety of S-ICDs versus TV-ICDs in HCM. Methods: On December 6th, 2023, we performed a comprehensive search of the PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane databases to identify randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and observational studies comparing S-ICDs with TV-ICDs in HCM patients published from 2004 until 2023. No language restrictions were applied. The primary outcome was appropriate shocks (AS), with inappropriate shocks (IAS), and device-related complications considered as secondary outcomes. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were pooled using a random effects model. The ROBINS-I tool was used to assess the risk of bias of the studies. Results: The search yielded 1,114 records. Seven studies comprising 4,347 HCM patients were included, of whom 3,325 (76.0%) had TV-ICDs, and 1,022 (22.6%) had S-ICDs. There were 2,564 males (58.9%). The age range was from 39.1 to 49.4 years. Compared with the TV-ICD group, the S-ICD cohort had a significantly lower incidence of device-related complications (OR 0.52; 95% CI: 0.30-0.89; P=0.02; I2=4%). Contrastingly, there were no statistically significant differences in the occurrences of AS (OR 0.49; 95% CI: 0.22-1.08; P=0.08; I2=75%) and IAS (OR 1.03; 95% CI: 0.57-1.84; P=0.93; I2=65%) between the two device modalities. In the analysis of the overall risk of bias in the studies, we found 42% of them with several, 28% with moderate, and 14% with low risk of bias. Conclusions: In HCM patients, S-ICDs were associated with a lower incidence of device-associated problems than TV-ICDs. AS and IAS incidence rates were similar between groups. These findings may assist clinicians in determining the most suitable device for treating patients with HCM.

Efficacy and safety of the subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator in patients with and without obesity: A meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: The subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (S-ICD) has emerged as an alternative to transvenous systems for prevention of sudden cardiac death. However, concerns have been raised regarding its efficacy and safety in obese individuals. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to perform a meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the S-ICD in patients with obesity by assessing the relationship between body mass index (BMI) and clinical outcomes. METHODS: A comprehensive search of multiple databases was conducted for English-language peer-reviewed studies reporting clinical outcomes in S-ICD recipients with (BMI ≥30 kg/m2) and without obesity (BMI <30 kg/m2). Data on preimplantation screening failure, defibrillation testing, complications, appropriate and inappropriate shocks, and survival were analyzed using standard, random-effects, meta-analytical techniques. RESULTS: Twenty-nine studies involving 20,486 patients were included. There was no statistically significant difference in mean BMI values of patients with failed or successful preimplantation screening (mean difference -0.60 kg/m2; 95% confidence interval [CI] -2.06 to 0.86). Obesity was associated with higher rates of failed defibrillation testing at ≤65 J (odds ratio [OR] 2.16; 95% CI 1.39-3.35), and malpositioning/suboptimal positioning occurred more frequently in obese compared to nonobese patients (OR 3.37; 95% CI 1.76-6.44). Increased BMI as a continuous variable (per increase in 1 kg/m2 BMI) was associated with elevated defibrillation thresholds (OR 1.05; 95% CI 1.03-1.08); higher risk of complications (hazard ratio [HR] 1.04; 95% CI 1.02-1.05); a trend toward an increased number of appropriate shocks (HR 1.02; 95% CI 1.00-1.04); and no significant increase in the risk of inappropriate shocks (HR 1.01; 95% CI 0.99-1.03). CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis underscores the importance of considering obesity in S-ICD implantation decisions. Although S-ICD remains effective in obese patients, attention to potential technical challenges and higher complication rates is warranted.

Double-device therapy in a patient with long QT syndrome.

A 26-year-old man with long QT syndrome (LQTS) underwent subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (S-ICD) implantation. The patient exhibited sinus bradycardia relative to his age. The heart rate decreased, and the QT interval became longer with the administration of ß-blockers, the first-line therapy for LQTS. The patient experienced frequent S-ICD discharges. Subsequently, a single-chamber pacemaker was implanted, and the 12-lead electrocardiogram showed atrial pacing and ventricular sensing at 60 beats per minute with a shorter QTc interval. After converting to "double-device therapy," the patient did not experience any ventricular arrhythmia events.

Occurrence of premature battery depletion in a large multicentre registry of subcutaneous cardioverter-defibrillator patients.

AIMS: Subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (S-ICDs) have become established in preventing sudden cardiac death, with some advantages over transvenous defibrillator systems, including a lower incidence of lead failures. Despite technological advancements, S-ICD carriers may suffer from significant complications, such as premature battery depletion (PBD), that led to an advisory for nearly 40 000 patients. This multicentre study evaluated the incidence of PBD in a large set of S-ICD patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: Data from patients implanted with S-ICD models A209 and A219 between October 2012 and July 2023 across nine centres in Europe and the USA were reviewed. Incidence and implications of PBD, defined as clinically observed sudden drop in battery longevity, were analysed and compared to PBD with the definition of battery depletion within 60 months. Prospectively collected clinical data were obtained retrospectively from medical records, device telemetry, and manufacturer reports. This registry is listed on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05713708). Of the 1112 S-ICD devices analysed, 547 (49.2%) were equipped with a potentially affected capacitor linked to PBD occurrence, currently under Food and Drug Administration advisory. The median follow-up time for all patients was 46 [inter-quartile range (IQR) 24-63] months. Clinically suspected PBD was observed in 159 (29.1%) of cases, with a median time to generator removal or replacement of 65 (IQR 55-72) months, indicative of significant deviations from expected battery lifespan. Manufacturer confirmation of PBD was made in 91.7% of devices returned for analysis. No cases of PBD were observed in devices that were not under advisory. CONCLUSION: This manufacturer-independent analysis highlights a notable incidence of PBD in patients equipped with S-ICD models under advisory, and the rate of PBD in this study corresponds to the rate currently estimated by the manufacturer. To the best of our knowledge, this provides the largest contemporary peer-reviewed study cohort investigating the actual incidence of PBD in S-ICD patients. These findings emphasize the importance of post-market registries in collaboration between clinicians and the manufacturer to optimize safety and efficacy in S-ICD treatment.

Incidence, implications, and management of sense-B-noise failure in subcutaneous cardioverter-defibrillator patients: insights from a large multicentre registry.

AIMS: Subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (S-ICDs) offer potentially distinct advantages over transvenous defibrillator systems. Recent randomized trials showed significantly lower lead failure rates than transvenous ICD. Still, S-ICDs remain associated with the risk of inappropriate shocks (IAS). While previous studies have reported varying causes of IAS, this study explores a rare cause of IAS, referred to as 'sense-B-noise.' It was recently described in case series, but its incidence has not been studied in a large cohort of S-ICD patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: We retrospectively reviewed data from patients implanted with S-ICD models 1010, A209, and A219 between October 2009 and July 2023 across nine centres in Europe and the USA. The analysis concentrated on determining the incidence and understanding the implications of sense-B-noise events. Sense-B-noise represents a rare manifestation of distinct electrogram abnormalities within the primary and alternate sensing vectors. Data were collected from medical records, device telemetry, and manufacturer reports for investigation. This registry is registered on clinicaltrials.gov (NCT05713708). Subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator devices of the 1158 patients were analysed. The median follow-up time for all patients was 46 (IQR 23-64) months. In 107 patients (9.2%) ≥1 IAS was observed during follow-up. Sense-B-noise failure was diagnosed in six (0.5 and 5.6% of all IAS) patients, in all patients, the diagnosis was made after an IAS episode. Median lead dwell time in the affected patients was 23 (2-70) months. To resolve the sense-B-noise defect, in three patients reprogramming to the secondary vector was undertaken, and two patients underwent system removal with subsequent S-ICD reimplantation due to low amplitude in the secondary vector. In one patient, the secondary vector was initially programmed, and subsequently, an S-ICD system exchange was performed due to T-wave-oversensing IAS episodes. CONCLUSION: This multicentre analysis' findings shed light on a rare but clinically highly significant adverse event in S-ICD therapy. To our knowledge, we provide the first systematic multicentre analysis investigating the incidence of sense-B-noise. Due to being difficult to diagnose and limited options for resolution, management of sense-B-noise is challenging. Complete system exchange may be the only option for some patients. Educating healthcare providers involved in S-ICD patient care is crucial for ensuring accurate diagnosis and effective management of sense-B-noise issues.

Personalized screening before subcutaneous cardioverter-defibrillator implantation: Usefulness and outcomes in clinical practice-the S-ICD screening SIS prospective study.

BACKGROUND: Electrocardiographic screening before subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (S-ICD) implantation is unsuccessful in around 10% of cases. A personalized screening method, by slightly moving the electrodes, to obtain a better R/T ratio has been described to overcome traditional screening failure. OBJECTIVE: The objectives of the SIS study were to assess to what extent a personalized screening method improves eligibility for S-ICD implantation and to evaluate the inappropriate shock rate after such screening success. METHODS: All consecutive patients eligible for an S-ICD implantation were prospectively recruited across 20 French centers between December 2019 and January 2022. In case of traditional screening failure, patients received a second personalized screening. If at least 1 vector was positive, the personalized screening was considered successful, and the patient was eligible for implantation. RESULTS: The study included 474 patients (mean age, 50.4 ± 14.1 years; 77.4% men). Traditional screening was successful in 456 (96.2%) cases. This figure rose to 98.3% (n = 466; P = .002) when personalized screening was performed. All patients implanted after successful personalized screening had correct signal detection on initial device interrogation. Nevertheless, after 1-year follow-up, 3 of the 7 patients (43%) implanted with personalized screening experienced inappropriate shock vs 18 of the 427 patients (4.2%) with traditional screening and S-ICD implantation (P = .003). CONCLUSION: Traditional S-ICD screening was successful in our study in a high proportion of patients. Considering the small improvement in success of screening and a higher rate of inappropriate shock, a strategy of personalized screening cannot be routinely recommended. CLINICALTRIALS: gov identifier: NCT04101253.

Unconventional diagnosis of bradyarrhythmic syncope in Brugada syndrome: a case report.

Background: The Brugada syndrome (BrS) is an inherited disorder associated with the risk of ventricular fibrillation and sudden cardiac death (SCD). The current main therapy is an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD). However, the risk stratification and management of patients remain challenging. Here, we present a case of BrS representative of the pitfalls that clinicians may encounter in the management of Brugada patients in routine clinical practice. Case summary: A 39-year-old man with BrS and recurring syncope was implanted with a subcutaneous ICD (S-ICD) (EMBLEM MRI S-ICD, Boston Scientific). Syncope recurred some months later. Subcutaneous ICD interrogation showed no arrhythmic events, but SMART Pass (high-pass filter) deactivation was noted. A query was sent to Boston Scientific clinical service, unveiling an extremely long asystolic pause as syncope determinant. Subcutaneous ICD was explanted and replaced by conventional single chamber ICD in the pre-pectoral region. Discussion: Brugada syndrome patients with high-risk features are candidates for ICD implantation to prevent SCD. Recent evidence highlighted that symptomatic patients carry a substantially higher risk compared with asymptomatic ones. Syncope may represent a pivotal symptom in BrS patients, but young patients with Type 1 Brugada pattern may experience syncope other than from tachyarrhythmias. Subcutaneous ICD is an advisable option in young ICD recipients to avoid lifetime complication related to standard transvenous systems. However, S-ICD lacks pacing capabilities and, therefore, is not indicated when an anti-bradycardia system is needed. The diagnostic workup of syncope in Brugada patients may be ineffective in elucidating the underlying aetiology whose understanding is essential to offer a personalized therapeutic approach.

Erector Spinae Plane Block Decreases Narcotic Requirements in Patients Undergoing Subcutaneous Implantable Cardioverter-defibrillator Placement Under Sedation.

Providing adequate analgesia perioperatively during subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (S-ICD) implantation can be a challenge. The objective of our study was to assess the efficacy and safety of the erector spinae plane (ESP) block technique in providing analgesia and minimizing the risk of opioid use in high-risk patient populations. We enrolled consecutive patients >18 years of age undergoing S-ICD implantation from February 2020 to February 2022 at our center prospectively. Patients were randomly assigned to receive the ESP block or traditional wound infiltration. A total of 24 patients were enrolled, including 13 patients randomized to ESP block and 11 patients as controls who received only wound infiltration. The primary outcome assessed was the overall use of perioperative analgesic medications in the ESP block group versus the surgical wound infiltration group. A significant reduction in intraoperative fentanyl use was observed [median ([interquartile range]) in the ESP block group (0 [0-50] µg) compared to the wound infiltration block group (75 [50-100] µg) (P = .001). The overall postoperative day (POD) 0 fentanyl use was also significantly decreased (75 [50-100] µg) in the ESP block group compared to the surgical wound infiltration group (100 [87.5-150] µg) (P = .049). There was also a trend of decreased POD 0 oxycodone-acetaminophen use. Finally, the number of days to discharge was less in the ESP block group. These results indicate that ESP block is an innovative, safe, and effective technique that decreases intraoperative and postoperative opioid consumption and may be a useful adjunct pain-management technique in these high-risk patients. Larger studies are needed to further validate its use.

Validation of the PRAETORIAN score in a large subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator collective: Usefulness in clinical routine.

BACKGROUND: To assess the risk of unsuccessful conversion of ventricular fibrillation during defibrillation testing (DFT) with the subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (S-ICD), the PRAETORIAN score has been proposed. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to validate the PRAETORIAN score in a large S-ICD collective. METHODS: A retrospective single-center analysis of S-ICD patients receiving intraoperative DFT was performed. DFT was performed using a stepwise protocol with 65-J standard polarity, change of polarity, increase to 80 J, and repositioning if necessary. If all DFTs failed, we switched to a transvenous ICD. RESULTS: Overall, 398 patients were analyzed (268 male [67.3%]; mean age 42.4 ± 15.9 years; mean body mass index [BMI] 25.9 ± 4.8 kg/m2). Successful DFT with the first ICD shock was observed in 264 patients (66.3%). One hundred fourteen patients were defibrillated with the second (n = 104) or third (n = 10) DFT after changing shock polarity and/or shock energy. Overall, 20 patients needed at least 3 DFT (ie, 80 J and/or re-positioning). The majority (n = 88 [65.7%]) of DFT failures occurred before 2015 with the first-generation S-ICD. PRAETORIAN score was an independent predictor of DFT failure (odds ratio [OR] 1.007; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.003-1.011 P ≤.001), while whereas BMI alone was not (P = .31). Presence of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) (OR 2.6; 95% CI 1.3-4.4; P = .004) was predictive for at least 1 unsuccessful DFT in our multivariate regression analysis. CONCLUSION: PRAETORIAN score proved to be a useful and valid predictive tool for successful DFT, whereas BMI only had a limited role. Patients with HCM were at increased risk for DFT failure or needed higher DFT energy.

Preoperative Prediction of Shock Impedance for Subcutaneous Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Using Chest Computed Tomography.

BACKGROUND: High shock impedance is associated with conversion failure among patients with subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillators (S-ICD). Currently, there is no preoperative assessment method for predicting high shock impedance. This study examined the efficacy of chest computed tomography (CT) as a preoperative evaluation tool to assess the shock impedance of S-ICDs. METHODS AND RESULTS: The amount of adipose tissue adjacent to the device and anteroposterior diameter at the basal heart region were measured preoperatively using chest CT. We examined the correlation between these measurements and shock impedance at the conversion test. We enrolled 43 patients with S-ICDs (mean [±SD] age 54±15 years; body mass index 23±4 kg/m2; PRAETORIAN score 30-270 points; amount of adipose tissue 1,250±716 cm3), who underwent intraoperative conversion tests by inducing ventricular fibrillation, which was terminated with a 65-J shock. A sufficient concordance correlation coefficient was observed between the shock impedance and the amount of adipose tissue (r=0.616, P<0.01) and anteroposterior diameter (r=0.645, P<0.01). In multiple regression analysis, the amount of adipose tissue (ß=0.439, P=0.009) and anteroposterior diameter (ß=0.344, P=0.038) were identified as independent predictive factors of shock impedance. CONCLUSIONS: The preoperative CT-measured amount of adipose tissue and basal heart anteroposterior diameter are independent predictors of shock impedance. These parameters may be more accurate in identifying higher shock impedance in patients with S-ICDs.

Chronic phase subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator lead dislodgement in a patient with arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy.

The subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator (S-ICD) is often used in young patients such as arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC) and Brugada syndrome due to long-term lead durability issues. Although S-ICD lead dislodgement is rare, we encountered such an incident in a young ARVC patient during the chronic phase following the two-incision technique. Remote monitoring system is useful for early diagnosis of electrode movement (Graphical abstract image). When S-ICD lead dislodgement occurs in active young patients, lead revision using the three-incision technique may be an option.

Contact allergy to subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator in a child with Brugada syndrome.

Allergic reactions to components of cardiac implantable electronic devices are rare and often go undiagnosed, which can lead to a misdiagnosis of device infection. Contact allergy to subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator (S-ICD) is extremely rare. In this report, we present a case of cobalt-related contact allergy in a pediatric patient with Brugada syndrome who underwent S-ICD implantation.