Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 845
Filter
1.
J Tissue Viability ; 2024 May 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38811295

ABSTRACT

AIM: This study aimed to evaluate adherence to an antibiotic prophylaxis protocol and its impact on incidence of surgical site infection (SSI). MATERIALS AND METHOD: A prospective observational cohort study was conducted at a teaching hospital in São Paulo, Brazil, from September to November 2015. The population were adults who underwent surgery with surgical antibiotic prophylaxis. The main outcomes measured were incidence of SSI at 30-days postoperatively, protocol adherence and surgical wound complications. STROBE guidelines were followed. RESULTS: Among the 527 participants recruited, a 30-day follow-up was completed by 78.7 % (n = 415). Within this cohort, 57.6 % were females aged over 60 years (36.4 %). The incidence of SSI stood at 9.4 % (n = 39), with dehiscence being the most prevalent complication at 64.1 % (n = 25), followed by increased exudate at 51.3 % (n = 20). Notably, full adherence to the antibiotic prophylaxis protocol was low at 1.7 % (n = 7). The study observed a 60 % increased risk of SSI for every protocol mistake made. Alarmingly, 17.8 % (n = 74) of participants received antibiotic treatment exceeding the stipulated protocol duration. The overall mortality rate stood at 13.5 % (n = 56), with 1 % (n = 4) of these deaths attributed to SSI. CONCLUSION: There is a pressing global necessity to enhance antibiotic management, as underscored by this study's revelation of low adherence to the antibiotic prophylaxis protocol. This lack of adherence correlated with a notable incidence of SSI and subsequent wound complications. Nearly 20 % of participants received prolonged antibiotic treatment. Adhering strictly to the protocol could substantially impact SSI-related outcomes and enhance global antibiotic management.

2.
World J Surg Oncol ; 22(1): 138, 2024 May 25.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38789966

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The Catalan Cancer Plan (CCP) undertakes periodic audits of cancer treatment outcomes, including organ/space surgical site infections (O/S-SSI) rates, while the Catalan Healthcare-associated Infections Surveillance Programme (VINCat) carries out standardized prospective surveillance of surgical site infections (SSI) in colorectal surgery. This cohort study aimed to assess the concordance between these two monitoring systems for O/S-SSI following primary rectal cancer surgery. METHODS: The study compared O/S-SSI incidence data from CCP clinical audits versus the VINCat Programme in patients undergoing surgery for primary rectal cancer, in 2011-12 and 2015-16, in publicly funded centres in Spain. The main outcome variable was the incidence of O/S-SSI in the first 30 days after surgery. Concordance between the two registers was analysed using Cohen's kappa. Discordant cases were reviewed by an expert, and the main reasons for discrepancies evaluated. RESULTS: Pooling data from both databases generated a sample of 2867 patients. Of these, O/S-SSI was detected in 414 patients-235 were common to both registry systems, with satisfactory concordance (κ = 0.69, 95% confidence interval 0.65-0.73). The rate of discordance from the CCP (positive cases in VINCat and negative in CCP) was 2.7%, and from VINCat (positive in CCP and negative in VINCat) was 3.6%. External review confirmed O/S-SSI in 66.2% of the cases in the CCP registry and 52.9% in VINCat. CONCLUSIONS: This type of synergy shows the potential of pooling data from two different information sources with a satisfactory level of agreement as a means to improving O/S-SSI detection. CLINICALTRIALS: gov Identifier: NCT06104579. Registered 30 November 2023.


Subject(s)
Rectal Neoplasms , Surgical Wound Infection , Humans , Rectal Neoplasms/surgery , Male , Female , Surgical Wound Infection/epidemiology , Surgical Wound Infection/diagnosis , Surgical Wound Infection/etiology , Spain/epidemiology , Aged , Prospective Studies , Middle Aged , Registries/statistics & numerical data , Follow-Up Studies , Prognosis , Incidence , Population Surveillance/methods , Databases, Factual
3.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38700752

ABSTRACT

Background: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has brought about drastic hygienic measures, one upside of which might be the mitigated occurrence of surgical site infection (SSI). This study investigated the association of the pandemic with SSI occurrence after cardiac surgeries. Patients and Methods: From 2014 to 2022, patients undergoing cardiac surgery were included and categorized into pre-pandemic and during-pandemic groups. Surgical site infections were classified into harvest-site, superficial sternal, and complex sternal infection. Multiple logistic regression and inverse probability weighting assessed the association of the pandemic with SSI. Results: Among a total of 26,143 patients, 793 SSIs occurred. The during-pandemic patients were younger (61.87 ± 10.58 vs. 65.64 ± 11.82) with a higher male proportion (70.1% vs. 67.4%) and a higher prevalence of all studied comorbidities/risk factors (expect cigarette smoking). Total SSI rate decreased substantially from 3.3% before COVID-19 to 1.8% afterward (p < 0.001). Inverse probability weights analyses evinced an independent association of the pandemic with a reduced risk of total (adjusted odds ratio [OR]; 0.59; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.45-0.78), harvest-site (adjusted OR, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.19-0.70), and superficial sternal infection (adjusted OR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.43-0.81). No significant association was observed with complex sternal site infection (adjusted OR, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.55-2.01). Multivariable regression recapitulated these findings. Conclusions: The COVID-19 pandemic independently pertained to more than a 40% reduction in SSI occurrence, particularly affecting harvest-site and superficial sternal infections. However, there remains the possibility of the implications of other known and unknown confounders on the observed association. To some extent, the decrease in SSIs after the pandemic can be justified by reinforced hygienic precautions, emphasizing the necessity of extending the adherence to these measurements into the post-COVID-19 era to maintain the status quo.

4.
Cureus ; 16(5): e59784, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38716365

ABSTRACT

Introduction Mechanical bowel preparation (MBP) before colorectal surgery is a common practice to reduce bacterial levels and infection. However, recent studies and data analyses have shown that this practice may increase the incidence of postoperative septic complications. Limited information is available regarding MBP for rectal surgeries. Our study aimed to examine the impact of MBP on postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing anterior resection with primary anastomosis for rectal cancer in a single-blinded, single-center, prospective, randomized trial. Materials and methods Data were collected between September 2013 and December 2015 at the Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences, Kochi, India. All patients scheduled for elective anterior resection with primary anastomosis for cancer between 5 cm and 15 cm were included in the study. All patients were randomized into the MBP and non-MBP groups after obtaining consent using a computer-based randomizer. The MBP group underwent bowel preparation with polyethylene glycol 24 hours before the operation and received sodium phosphate rectal enemas the night before the procedure. In the non-MBP group, only dietary restriction with a low-residue diet for 48 hours was recommended. Laparoscopic and open surgeries were performed. A contrast enema with barium was performed on all patients on postoperative days 6-8 to detect an anastomotic leak. Our primary endpoint was to assess the rate of anastomotic leakage between the two groups. The secondary endpoints were surgical site infection and postoperative morbidity. Results A total of 78 patients were recruited in the trial, and 18 were excluded because the surgery was the Hartmann procedure or abdominal perineal resection. The remaining 60 patients were divided equally into the MBP and non-MBP groups. No clinically significant disparities were evident between the groups concerning the preoperative prognosticators of anastomotic leak. Among the cohort, anastomotic leakage occurred in eight patients, representing a 13.3% incidence. Remarkably, within this subset, seven patients (23.3%) were attributed to the non-MBP cohort, whereas only one patient (3.3%) belonged to the MBP group. These findings demonstrated a statistically noteworthy discrepancy. The two groups had no statistically significant difference in surgical site infection and postoperative morbidity. Conclusion Our study suggests the benefit of preoperative MBP in sphincter-preserving rectal surgery to reduce the anastomotic leak rate. Additionally, incorporating large-scale studies and meta-analyses could enhance the robustness of our conclusions.

5.
Transpl Infect Dis ; : e14280, 2024 Apr 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38605586

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Surgical site infection (SSI) after liver transplant (LT) is common, but no studies have been conducted in Australia. The purpose of this study was to determine the proportion of patients who developed an SSI post-LT in Australia's largest LT unit. METHODS: This was a single-center retrospective cohort study. We included all LT recipients who were aged 18 years or more and received their transplant between March 1, 2018 and April 1, 2023. The primary outcome was to determine the proportion of LT recipients who developed an SSI within 30 days of transplantation. RESULTS: There were 404 LTs performed during the study period, and 375 met inclusion criteria. Of these, 8% (n = 31/375) developed an SSI and were classified as superficial (3%, n = 12/375) or deep/organ space (5%, n = 19/375). The most common antibiotics used for prophylaxis were amoxicillin/clavulanate (75%, n = 281/375), followed by piperacillin/tazobactam (17%, n = 62/375). Independent risk factors associated with the development of SSI were Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy (aOR 3.16, 95% CI 1.17-8.28, p = .02), operative time (per 60-min increment) (aOR 1.23, 95% CI 1.02-1.48), and re-operation (aOR 4.16, 95% CI 1.81-9.58, p < .01). Type of antibiotic received perioperatively was not significantly associated with SSI. CONCLUSION: SSI occurred in 8% of LT recipients and was predominantly related to operation-related factors rather than patient- or antibiotic-related factors.

6.
J Surg Oncol ; 2024 Apr 25.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38664921

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Preoperative antibiotic options for pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) include cefoxitin (CX), piperacillin-tazobactam (PT), or combined cefazolin and metronidazole (CM). Recent studies suggest the superiority of PT over CX, but evidence for CM is unclear. OBJECTIVE: To explore the impact of preoperative antibiotic selection (CM vs. PT and CX vs. PT) on the development of surgical site infections (SSI). METHODS: Consecutive adult patients at one institution who underwent PD from November 2017 to December 2021 and received either CM, PT, or CX preoperatively, were included. The primary outcome was SSI. Secondary outcomes included postoperative infections and clinically significant postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF). Logistic regression models were used. RESULTS: Among 127 patients included in the study, PT, CM, and CX were administered in 46 (36.2%), 44 (34.6%), and 37 (29.4%) patients, respectively. There were 32 (27.1%) SSI, 20 (36.1%) infections, and 21 (22.9%) POPF events. PT use was associated with reduced risk of SSI compared to CX (OR: 0.32, 95% CI: 0.11-0.89, p = 0.03), but there was no difference as compared to CM (OR: 0.75, 95% CI: 0.27-2.13, p = 0.59). There were no differences in secondary outcomes. CONCLUSION: PT reduced SSI rates compared to CX but was no different to CM among patients undergoing PD at our center.

7.
J Hosp Infect ; 148: 138-144, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38554806

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The Radboudumc developed a smartphone application (WondGezond) to collect surgical wound-healing information provided by the patient. AIM: To evaluate usability and outcomes to assess its potential for early surgical site infection (SSI) detection. METHODS: Patients surgically treated for degenerative spinal disorders or carpal tunnel syndrome between August 2020 and February 2023 were enrolled one day post surgery and asked to download the app via a quick-response (QR) code. Participants uploaded a photo and answered four questions about their wound daily, for 14 days. Afterwards, participants indicated whether they received treatment for a suspected SSI (participant-reported outcome). Two neurosurgeons independently assessed photos and questionnaire answers for suspected SSIs (physician-assessed outcome). The association between both outcomes was determined by calculating sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive value (PPV/NPV). FINDINGS: After 2009 surgeries, 1695 QR-codes were distributed and 412 (21%) were activated. In all, 232 (56%) participants completed the 14-day period of whom 22 (10%) reported SSI treatment. Physician assessment identified 15 (7%) SSIs. Concordance was reached in 88% of cases. Among 27 discordant cases were 17 false-positives and 10 false-negatives, resulting in low sensitivity (33%) and PPV (23%), but high NPV (95%). CONCLUSION: WondGezond provides clinicians with information regarding wound healing and SSIs to follow-up on patients at risk, while possibly also reducing antibiotic (over)treatment and unnecessary visits for patients without issues in wound healing. However, the low participation and false-positive results render the app in its current form unsuitable for surveillance purposes. Further validation of WondGezond is required.


Subject(s)
Mobile Applications , Neurosurgical Procedures , Smartphone , Surgical Wound Infection , Wound Healing , Humans , Female , Male , Middle Aged , Aged , Neurosurgical Procedures/adverse effects , Adult , Surveys and Questionnaires , Aged, 80 and over
8.
Intensive Crit Care Nurs ; 82: 103658, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38431985

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Surgical wound infection is the most frequent type of care health associated infection. Lack of knowledge about the prevention of surgical wound infection in patients undergoing left ventricular assist device implantation could significantly undermine the potential benefits of surgical intervention. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to map the recommendations for adult patients undergoing left ventricular assist device implantation. DESIGN: This is a scoping review, being registered in the Open Science Framework under DOI https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/Q76B3 (https://osf.io/q76b3/). METHOD: Left ventricular assist device coordinators and nurse specialists in dermatology and stomatherapy conducted a scoping review in Scopus, The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), limited to the period between 2015 and 2022. The results of this scoping review will be discussed and presented in separate articles. This paper will synthesize research evidence on the perioperative topic. RESULTS: The initial searches resulted in 771 studies. Sixty nine met the eligibility criteria and were included in the scoping review. Eight articles addressing the perioperative topic that answered the question of this article were included. CONCLUSION: Although this scoping review included heterogeneous, and scarce studies with left ventricular assist device patients. As such, there are many promising future research directions for this topic. IMPLICATIONS FOR CLINICAL PRACTICE: Infection surveillance should be an integral part of left ventricular assist device implantation programs in health care institutions. Velvet completely buried in subcutaneous tissues reduces transmission system infection. Triple tunnel method reduces transmission system infection risk.


Subject(s)
Heart-Assist Devices , Surgical Wound Infection , Adult , Humans , Surgical Wound Infection/prevention & control , Heart-Assist Devices/adverse effects , Systematic Reviews as Topic
9.
Indian J Anaesth ; 68(3): 223-230, 2024 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38476545

ABSTRACT

Background and Aims: Healthcare workers (HCWs), which include surgeons, anaesthesiologists, nurses, technicians, and other non-medical staff working in the operation theatre (OT), change to surgical scrubs for providing designated services. This study was intended to investigate the association of moving in and out of OT to other hospital areas without changing scrubs and its impact on bacterial infection. Methods: After PROSPERO registration, we performed a systematic review to compare the occurrence of surgical site infections (SSIs) with or without the movement of HCWs outside OT. We searched PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane Library using relevant keywords. RoB-2 and ROBINS-E tools were used to assess the risk of bias in randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies, respectively. Results: We identified six articles that fulfilled the inclusion criteria: three RCTs and three observational studies. A risk of bias assessment revealed an overall low bias in the RCTs and an overall high bias in the observational studies. The analysis revealed a comparable incidence of bacterial infection in terms of colony-forming units when scrubs when HCWs moved in and out of OT with the same scrubs. A meta-analysis was not performed due to heterogeneity in participants and the OT set-up, as well as fewer studies and sample size. Conclusion: The evidence is insufficient to suggest that wearing scrubs outside the OT could increase the incidence of SSI in surgical patients or transmit the organisms to patients, causing infection. The present review neither supports nor is against wearing surgical scrubs outside OT premises.

10.
World Neurosurg ; 184: e821-e829, 2024 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38373687

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Two techniques for paraspinous muscle flap closure of spine surgeries have been described: one with tension-free mobilization of the muscle flaps approximated at the midline and one with perforators more aggressively dissected to allow for overlapping of the flaps. We seek to compare the surgical outcomes in patients who underwent either type of complex spinal closure as no investigation has yet evaluated a superior technique. METHODS: An institutional review board (IRB)-approved retrospective analysis was conducted on all patients who underwent spine surgery followed by locoregional muscle flap complex closure performed by a single plastic surgeon between January 2016 and July 2021. Patients were divided into 2 groups based on which closure method was employed. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were computed by multivariable logistic regression with Firth's correction. RESULTS: One hundred and 10 patients with similar baseline demographics were included. There were significantly more smokers (15% vs. 0%, P = 0.02) and a significantly greater rate of postoperative radiation (40% vs. 17%, P = 0.009) in the overlapping group. After controlling for smoking and postoperative radiation, the incidence of surgical site infection, skin necrosis, dehiscence, hematoma, and seroma did not differ between the groups. The procedure length per centimeter of closure was shorter in the midline approximation group, although this data fell just short of significance (3.2 vs. 3.8 minutes/cm, P = 0.08). CONCLUSIONS: The present study demonstrates that both the overlapping and midline approximation of muscle flaps are equally safe and effective strategies for locoregional closure of spinal wounds.


Subject(s)
Plastic Surgery Procedures , Surgeons , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome , Surgical Flaps/adverse effects , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology
11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38389227

ABSTRACT

Objective: We evaluated the role of subgaleal closed suction drains in postoperative epidural hematoma (EDH) and wound complications following pterional craniotomy for cerebral aneurysm. Methods: We reviewed 5,280 pterional craniotomies performed on 5,139 patients between January 2006 and December 2020. A drain was placed subgalealy and tip of drain was positioned between the bone flap and the deep temporalis. 1,637 cases (31%) had a subgaleal suction drain. We analyzed demographic and clinical variables related to EDH requiring evacuation and wound complications in patients with and without drains. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to determine the associated risk factors. Results: Fourteen cases (0.27%) of EDH requiring evacuation and 30 cases (0.57%) of wound complications were identified. Univariate analysis found that drain insertion, subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH), and operation time were associated with EDH, while drain insertion, SAH, male gender, older age, and longer operation time were associated with wound complications. Multivariate analysis found no significant association between drain use and EDH (OR=1.62, p=0.402) or wound complications (OR=1.45, p=0.342). Conclusions: Routine use of subgaleal closed suction drains may not be necessary after pterional craniotomy, as drain insertion was not associated with a reduced risk of EDH requiring evacuation or wound complications.

12.
Int Wound J ; 21(2): e14765, 2024 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38351472

ABSTRACT

The present systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to determine the prevalence of surgical site infection (SSI) and risk factors in patients after knee surgery. A comprehensive and systematic search was carried out across various international electronic databases, including Scopus, PubMed and Web of Science, as well as Persian electronic databases like Iranmedex and the Scientific Information Database (SID). This search involved the utilization of keywords derived from Medical Subject Headings, such as 'Prevalence', 'Surgical wound infection', 'Surgical site infection' and 'Orthopaedics', spanning from the earliest records up to 1 October 2023. To assess the quality of the included studies, the Appraisal tool for Cross-Sectional Studies (AXIS tool) was utilized. The study encompassed a combined participant pool of 11 028 individuals who underwent knee surgery across seven selected studies. The collective prevalence of SSI in patients who underwent knee surgery, as reported in the seven included studies, was determined to be 3.0% (95% CI: 1.2% to 7.5%; I2 = 96.612%; p < 0.001). The combined prevalence of SSI in patients with DM, as reported in six studies, was 5.1% (95% CI: 1.7% to 14.5%; I2 = 79.054%; p < 0.001). Similarly, the pooled prevalence of SSI in patients with HTN, drawn from four studies, was 1.8% (95% CI: 0.7% to 4.5%; I2 = 63.996%; p = 0.040). Additionally, the collective prevalence of SSI in patients with a history of tobacco use, based on findings from six studies, was 4.8% (95% CI: 1.4% to 15.2%; I2 = 93.358%; p < 0.001). Subgroup analysis was conducted within six studies, categorizing them by two countries, namely China and the USA. These analyses revealed that the prevalence of SSI following knee surgery was 3.0% in China and 2.0% in the USA. It is noteworthy that variations in SSI prevalence across different studies may be attributed to a multitude of factors, particularly varying risk factors among patient populations. To address this issue and mitigate the impact of SSI on knee surgery patients, it is advisable to develop tailored interventions.


Subject(s)
Orthopedic Procedures , Surgical Wound Infection , Humans , Surgical Wound Infection/epidemiology , Surgical Wound Infection/etiology , Prevalence , Cross-Sectional Studies , Risk Factors
13.
Langenbecks Arch Surg ; 409(1): 62, 2024 Feb 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38358547

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Many studies have demonstrated significant antibiotic resistance by commonly isolated organisms. This is an eye-opener for the clinicians, who prescribe antibiotics day in and out. This situation shifts our attention towards the usage of antiseptic measures, which can at times play an important role in preventing and treating various infections. METHOD: This is a double-blinded randomized controlled study that compares the bundle approach to the conventional approach for the prevention of surgical site infections in patients of peritonitis undergoing midline laparotomy in emergency. The bundle approach includes three measures, namely, painting of surgical site with chlorhexidine, dabbing the wound with povidone-iodine after the closure of the rectus sheath, and application of chlorhexidine-impregnated gauze piece over the skin wound. RESULTS: The total sample size was 64 (32 in each arm). The rate of surgical site infection was significantly lower in the test arm (21.8%) as compared to the conventional arm (46.8%). The mean length of hospital stay was shorter by one day in the test arm, although, not significant. The isolates from the peritoneal fluid culture and wound culture were mostly gram-negative organisms. Most of the organisms exhibited resistance toward third generation cephalosporins, fluoroquinolones, and aminoglycosides. CONCLUSION: Antibiotic resistance is a burning concern in today's world. Alternative methods of preventing infection in the form of using antiseptics should be sought. Although our study was limited to emergency cases, this bundle approach can be implemented in elective cases as well.


Subject(s)
Abdominal Wall , Surgical Wound Infection , Humans , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Chlorhexidine/therapeutic use , Laparotomy/adverse effects , Povidone-Iodine , Surgical Wound Infection/prevention & control , Double-Blind Method
14.
Cureus ; 16(1): e52106, 2024 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38213935

ABSTRACT

Background and objective Cochlear implants are highly effective for the treatment of severe to profound hearing loss. Cochlear implant surgery is a safe surgical procedure; however, due to many modifications over the years, it has been associated with certain minor and major complications. This study aimed to examine the intraoperative difficulties and postoperative complications in patients who received cochlear implants in Erbil City. Methods We conducted a retrospective descriptive study regarding complications of cochlear implants involving patients who received unilateral or bilateral cochlear Implants at the Rizgary Teaching Hospital and a private hospital in Erbil City from January 2013 to July 2022. Their medical records were analyzed, and data on demographics, intraoperative difficulties, and postoperative complications were gathered. Results A total of 160 patients with cochlear implants (87 male, 54.4%; 73 female, 45.6%) were included in the study. The mean age of the patients at the time of operation was 6.76 ± 8.02 years (range: 1-53 years); 150 of these patients were children and 10 were adults (18 years and above). Intraoperative difficulties occurred in five patients (3.1%). The overall rate of complication was 10%, 7.5% of which was minor (the most common being wound infection) and 2.5% major (the most frequent being device extrusion). Conclusions Cochlear implant surgery is a safe procedure performed to treat profoundly deaf patients. It is associated with a low rate of complications, most of which can be successfully managed with conservative measures or minimal intervention.

15.
J Orthop Traumatol ; 25(1): 4, 2024 Jan 28.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38282128

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Surgical site infections (SSI) are the most frequent early complications of hand surgeries. However, the indications still remain uncertain for antibiotic prophylaxis in elective clean soft tissue surgeries of the hand and upper limb. Therefore, a systematic review of the literature and a meta-analysis was conducted to investigate the impact of antibiotic prophylaxis on the prevention of SSI in these types of surgeries. METHODS: An electronic search was performed in the following databases: MEDLINE/Pubmed, PMC/Pubmed, Web of Science/Clarivate Analytics, Embase/Elsevier, Scopus/Elsevier, BVS/Lilacs, and the Cochrane Library, with no restrictions regarding publication language or date. The primary outcome of interest was the occurrence of SSI following elective clean soft tissue surgeries of the hand and upper limb according to the administration of preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis and no antibiotic prophylaxis. Surgeries involving simultaneous bone procedures or orthopedic implants were excluded. Study selection and data extraction were conducted independently by two reviewers. RoB 2.0 and ROBINS-I are Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials and non-randomized studies of interventions. The magnitude of the intervention effect was estimated using the relative risk (RR). The meta-analysis was performed with the Review Manager and R software tools, using the Mantel-Haenszel random-effects model and a 95% confidence interval (CI). Results with p ≤ 0.05 were considered statistically significant. The quality of evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. RESULTS: The initial search yielded 1175 titles, from which 12 articles met the inclusion criteria for the systematic review, and 10 were included in the subsequent meta-analysis. The majority of these studies were nonrandomized intervention trials, exhibiting a moderate risk of bias. According to our review, preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis did not have a statistically significant impact on the incidence of SSI (RR = 1.13, 95% CI 0.91-1.40, p = 0.28). The overall quality of evidence for this outcome was rated as low. Moderate statistical heterogeneity was observed (I2 = 44%), and the prespecified sensitivity analysis highlighted the consistency of the results. CONCLUSIONS: While these results were consistent with the findings from individual studies included in this review, it is important to note that, given the threshold of p ≤ 0.05 for statistical significance, no definitive conclusions can be drawn from the quantitative analysis of the data obtained. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 2. TRIAL REGISTRATION: CRD42023417786.


Subject(s)
Antibiotic Prophylaxis , Surgical Wound Infection , Humans , Incidence , Surgical Wound Infection/epidemiology , Surgical Wound Infection/prevention & control , Upper Extremity/surgery
16.
Online braz. j. nurs. (Online) ; 23: e20246673, 02 jan 2024. ilus
Article in English, Portuguese | LILACS, BDENF - Nursing | ID: biblio-1527197

ABSTRACT

OBJETIVO: mapear evidências científicas sobre a prevenção e o manejo precoce de infecção de sítio cirúrgico por telemonitoramento em pacientes cirúrgicos após alta hospitalar. MÉTODO: revisão de escopo desenvolvida conforme proposto pelo Instituto Joanna Briggs (JBI). Foi realizada a pesquisa nas bases de dados PubMed, Literatura Latino-americana e do Caribe em Ciências da Saúde (LILACS), Cochrane Collaboration, Scopus, CINAHL, MEDLINE, Web of Science e Embase. Os estudos foram adicionados ao gerenciador Endnote Basic e Rayyan por três pesquisadores independentes. RESULTADOS: foram identificados 1.386 estudos e incluídos 31, os quais apresentaram relevância em relação a sinais de alerta precoce e tardio da infecção de sítio cirúrgico, complicações, fatores de risco, prevenção e utilização do telemonitoramento. CONCLUSÃO: observou-se que, embora os estudos abordem a infecção de sítio cirúrgico e o telemonitoramento, faz-se necessário a formulação dos instrumentos utilizados nas consultas telefônicas, contemplando com maior especificidade os critérios indispensáveis a serem abordados.


OBJECTIVE: This study aims to map scientific evidence regarding the prevention and early management of surgical site infection through telemonitoring in surgical patients after discharge from the hospital. METHOD: A scoping review was conducted following the guidelines proposed by the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI). The search was performed across PubMed, Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature (LILACS), Cochrane Collaboration, Scopus, CINAHL, MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Embase databases. Three independent researchers collect the identified studies using Endnote Basic and Rayyan. RESULTS: A total of 1,386 studies were identified, of which 31 were included in the analysis. These selected studies demonstrated significance regarding early and late warning signs of surgical site infection, complications, risk factors, prevention strategies, and the utilization of telemonitoring. CONCLUSION: While the studies address surgical site infection and telemonitoring, it is imperative to formulate the instruments employed in telephonic consultations, incorporating a more specific consideration of essential criteria to be addressed.


Subject(s)
Patient Discharge , Postoperative Care , Surgical Wound Infection/prevention & control , Surgical Wound Infection/therapy , Telemonitoring , Nursing Care
17.
Int Wound J ; 21(1): e14350, 2024 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37606302

ABSTRACT

The present systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to determine the prevalence of surgical site infection (SSI) and related factors in patients after foot and ankle surgery. A comprehensive, systematic search was conducted in different international electronic databases, such as Scopus, PubMed, Web of Science and Persian electronic databases such as Iranmedex and Scientific Information Database (SID) using keywords extracted from Medical Subject Headings such as 'Prevalence', 'Surgical wound infection', 'Surgical site infection' and 'Orthopaedics' from the earliest to 1 June 2023. The appraisal tool for cross-sectional studies (AXIS tool) evaluates the quality of the included studies. A total of 10 447 patients undergoing foot and ankle surgery participated in nine studies. The pooled prevalence of SSI in patients who underwent foot and ankle surgery was reported in nine studies was 4.2% (95% CI: 2.4%-7.2%; I2 = 96.793%; p < 0.001). The odds ratio of SSI prevalence in men was higher than that of women and was significant (OR: 1.335; 95% CI: 1.106-1.612; Z = 3.009; p = 0.003). The pooled prevalence of SSI in patients with hindfoot fracture sites reported in five studies was 4.9% (95% CI: 2.6%-8.9%; I2 = 90.768%; p < 0.001). The pooled prevalence of SSI in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) reported in six studies was 9.1% (95% CI: 5.6%-14.6%; I2 = 73.957%; p = 0.002). The pooled prevalence of SSI in patients with hypertension (HTN) reported in five studies was 5.5% (95% CI: 2.5%-11.6%; I2 = 91.346%; p < 0.001). The pooled prevalence of SSI in patients with tobacco use reported in eight studies was 6.6% (95% CI: 4.1%-10.4%; I2 = 85.379%; p < 0.001). In general, the existing differences in the prevalence of SSI after foot and ankle surgery in different studies can be based on different risk factors such as comorbidities and gender. Therefore, it is suggested to design appropriate interventions to reduce SSI in these patients.


Subject(s)
Ankle , Surgical Wound Infection , Male , Humans , Female , Surgical Wound Infection/epidemiology , Surgical Wound Infection/etiology , Ankle/surgery , Prevalence , Cross-Sectional Studies , Risk Factors
18.
J Tissue Viability ; 33(1): 75-88, 2024 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37977894

ABSTRACT

AIM: Surgical site infections (SSIs) are common healthcare associated infections with serious consequences for patients and healthcare organisations. It is critical that healthcare professionals implement prevention strategies to reduce the incidence of such infections. Prevention strategies are key to reducing the incidence of SSIs. The aim of this systematic review is to describe the effect of interventions conducted in acute care settings on the incidence of SSIs (primary outcome), length of stay, intensive care unit admission, and mortality rate (secondary outcomes). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This review is reported using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic review and Meta-Analysis checklist. A search was undertaken in Academic Search Complete, CINAHL, ERIC, MEDLINE, PsycARTICLES, PsycINFO and Web of Science for studies published between January 2017 and March 2022. Studies that focused on interventions within acute hospital settings in patients undergoing elective surgery with the aim of reducing the incidences of SSIs were included. Due to heterogeneity results were synthesised narratively. RESULTS: In total, 23 studies were included. Findings show that interventions that are effective in reducing the incidences of SSIs have multiple components including care bundles, stakeholder engagement, targeted surveillance and education. Few studies were identified that evaluated the effect of SSI prevention interventions on length of stay and mortality, and none assessed intensive care admission rates. CONCLUSIONS: The included interventions varied widely, which made it difficult to draw definitive conclusions regarding specific interventions that reduce SSI. Multicomponent interventions and care bundles showed promise in reducing the occurrence of SSIs. Further studies should focus on standardised evidence-based interventions and compliance using randomised controlled designs.


Subject(s)
Critical Care , Surgical Wound Infection , Humans , Surgical Wound Infection/epidemiology , Surgical Wound Infection/prevention & control , Incidence
19.
Asian J Surg ; 47(2): 993-994, 2024 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37914650

ABSTRACT

TECHNIQUE: (1) A four-pointed star-shaped incision was made to separate the skin around the stoma intestine. (2) The stoma intestine was resected, and side-to-side or end-to-side anastomosis was performed to restore the continuity of the intestine. (3) The peritoneum and rectus sheath should be closed using continuous full-thickness sutures. (4) The subcutaneous fat layer and dermis layer should be sutured using purse-string sutures. Two holes should be made in the center of the sutured area. (5) The cross should be sutured intermittently on all four sides using 1-2 stitches. (6) A rubber strip should be placed in the center of the small hole. RESULTS: The presence of a small hole in the center of the incision and the use of a rubber strip for drainage facilitate early fluid drainage. The design of a cross-stitched skin incision helps reduce local tension. CONCLUSION: The modified cross-suture technique may reduce postoperative incision infections and associated pain, which is a suitable incision treatment method for loop stoma reversal.


Subject(s)
Abdominal Wall , Surgical Stomas , Humans , Rubber , Suture Techniques , Surgical Wound Infection , Sutures
20.
J Clin Nurs ; 33(3): 890-910, 2024 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38013213

ABSTRACT

AIMS: To identify postoperative interventions and quality improvement initiatives used to prevent wound complications in patients undergoing colorectal surgeries, the types of activities nurses undertake in these interventions/initiatives and how these activities align with nurses' scope of practice. DESIGN: A scoping review. DATA SOURCES: Three health databases were searched, and backward and forward citation searching occurred in April 2022. Research and quality improvement initiatives included focussed on adult patients undergoing colorectal surgery, from 2010 onwards. Data were extracted about study characteristics, nursing activities and outcomes. The 'Dimensions of the scope of nursing practice' framework was used to classify nursing activities and then the Patterns, Advances, Gaps, Evidence for practice and Research recommendations framework was used to synthesise the review findings. RESULTS: Thirty-seven studies were included. These studies often reported negative wound pressure therapy and surgical site infection bundle interventions/initiatives. Nurses' scope of practice was most frequently 'Technical procedure and delegated medical care' meaning nurses frequently acted under doctors' orders, with the most common delegated activity being dressing removal. CONCLUSION: The full extent of possible interventions nurses could undertake independently in the postoperative period requires further exploration to improve wound outcomes and capitalise on nurses' professional role. IMPACT STATEMENT: Nurses' role in preventing postoperative wound complications is unclear, which may inhibit their ability to influence postoperative outcomes. In the postoperative period, nurses undertake technical activities, under doctors' orders to prevent wound infections. For practice, nurses need to upkeep and audit their technical skills. New avenues for researchers include exploration of independent activities for postoperative nurses and the outcomes of these activities. IMPLICATIONS FOR THE PROFESSION AND/OR PATIENT CARE: There may be opportunities to broaden nurses' scope of practice to act more autonomously to prevent wound complication. REPORTING METHOD: Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) checklist. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: A health consumer interpreted the data and prepared the manuscript.


Subject(s)
Colorectal Neoplasms , Digestive System Surgical Procedures , Adult , Humans , Surgical Wound Infection/prevention & control , Patients , Postoperative Care
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...