Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters











Language
Publication year range
1.
Aten. prim. (Barc., Ed. impr.) ; 55(9): 102679, Sept. 2023. ilus, tab
Article in English | IBECS | ID: ibc-224791

ABSTRACT

Object: To explore the factors related to health-promoting lifestyles of the elderly based on social-ecosystem theory. Design: A cross-sectional survey study was carried out to include 627 elderly people in communities in three cities of Hebei Province (Shijiazhuang, Tangshan, and Zhangjiakou) from October 2021 to January 2022 for questionnaire survey (601 validly returned cases). Venue: Three cities of Hebei Province (Shijiazhuang, Tangshan, and Zhangjiakou). Participants: 627 elderly people. Interventions: A cross-sectional survey study. Main measurements: The questionnaire survey was conducted by using the general demographic data, health promotion life scale, frailty scale, general self-efficacy scale, health engagement scale, General Self-Efficacy Scale, The family Adaptability, Partnership, Growth, Affection, and Resolve scale, and Perceived Social Support Scale. Results: The total health promotion lifestyle score for the elderly was 100.20±16.21, which was at the lower limit of the good level, with the highest mean score for nutrition (2.71±0.51) and the lowest mean score for physical activity (2.25±0.56). Stepwise linear regression showed that exercise frequency (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.304–3.885), smoking status (95% CI −4.190 to −1.556), self-efficacy (95% CI 0.071–0.185), health management (95% CI 0.306–0.590), frailty (95% CI −3.327 to −1.162) in the microsystem, marital status (95% CI 0.677–3.660), children's attention to the elderly health (95% CI 4.866–11.305), family care in the mesosystem (95% CI 1.365–4.968), and pre-retirement occupation (95% CI 2.065–3.894), living area (95% CI 0.813–3.912), whether receive community-based chronic disease prevention and management services (95% CI 2.035–8.149)...(AU)


Objetivo: Explorar los factores relacionados con los estilos de vida saludables de adultos mayores a partir de la teoría del ecosistema social. Diseño: Se realizó un estudio de encuesta transversal para incluir a 627 ancianos de la comunidad de tres ciudades de la provincia de Hebei (Shijiazhuang, Tangshan y Zhangjiakou) de octubre de 2021 a enero de 2022 para encuesta por cuestionario (601 casos válidos). Lugar: Tres ciudades de la provincia de Hebei (Shijiazhuang, Tangshan y Zhangjiakou).Participantes: Seiscientos veintisiete (627) ancianos. Intervenciones: Estudio transversal y de encuesta. Principales medidas: La encuesta se realizó utilizando los datos demográficos generales, la escala de promoción de la salud de vida, la escala de fragilidad, la escala de autoeficacia general, la escala de compromiso con la salud, la escala de autoeficacia general, la escala de adaptabilidad familiar, asociación, crecimiento, afecto y resolución y la escala de apoyo social percibido. Resultados: La puntuación total de estilo de vida en promoción de la salud para los ancianos fue de 100,20 ± 16,21, que se sitúen en el límite inferior del nivel bueno, con la mayor puntuación media para nutrición (2,71 ± 0,51) y la menor puntuación media para actividad física (2,25 ± 0,56). La regresión lineal por pasos mostró que la frecuencia de ejercicio (intervalo de confianza del 95% [IC 95%] 1,304 – 3,885), el estado de tabaquismo (IC 95% -4,190 – -1,556), la autoeficacia (IC 95% 0,071 – 0,185), el manejo de la salud (IC 95% 0,306 – 0,590), la fragilidad (IC 95% -3,327 – -1,162) en el microsistema, el estado civil (IC 95% 0,677 – 3.660), la atención de los niños a la salud de los ancianos (IC 95% 4,866 – 11,305), el cuidado familiar en el mesosistema (IC 95% 1,365 – 4,968) y la ocupación previa a la jubilación (IC 95% 2,065 – 3,894), área de residencia (IC 95%: 0,813 – 3,912), recibir servicios comunitarios de prevención y manejo de enfermedades crónicas (IC 95%: 2,035 – 8,149)...(AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Aged , Healthy Lifestyle , Self Efficacy , Frailty , Aging , Health of the Elderly , Surveys and Questionnaires , Cross-Sectional Studies , China , Health Promotion
2.
Aten Primaria ; 55(9): 102679, 2023 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37295306

ABSTRACT

OBJECT: To explore the factors related to health-promoting lifestyles of the elderly based on social-ecosystem theory. DESIGN: A cross-sectional survey study was carried out to include 627 elderly people in communities in three cities of Hebei Province (Shijiazhuang, Tangshan, and Zhangjiakou) from October 2021 to January 2022 for questionnaire survey (601 validly returned cases). VENUE: Three cities of Hebei Province (Shijiazhuang, Tangshan, and Zhangjiakou). PARTICIPANTS: 627 elderly people. INTERVENTIONS: A cross-sectional survey study. MAIN MEASUREMENTS: The questionnaire survey was conducted by using the general demographic data, health promotion life scale, frailty scale, general self-efficacy scale, health engagement scale, General Self-Efficacy Scale, The family Adaptability, Partnership, Growth, Affection, and Resolve scale, and Perceived Social Support Scale. RESULTS: The total health promotion lifestyle score for the elderly was 100.20±16.21, which was at the lower limit of the good level, with the highest mean score for nutrition (2.71±0.51) and the lowest mean score for physical activity (2.25±0.56). Stepwise linear regression showed that exercise frequency (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.304-3.885), smoking status (95% CI -4.190 to -1.556), self-efficacy (95% CI 0.071-0.185), health management (95% CI 0.306-0.590), frailty (95% CI -3.327 to -1.162) in the microsystem, marital status (95% CI 0.677-3.660), children's attention to the elderly health (95% CI 4.866-11.305), family care in the mesosystem (95% CI 1.365-4.968), and pre-retirement occupation (95% CI 2.065-3.894), living area (95% CI 0.813-3.912), whether receive community-based chronic disease prevention and management services (95% CI 2.035-8.149), social support (95% CI 1.667-6.493) in the macrosystem were the main factors affecting health promotion of life in the elderly (P<0.05). Hierarchical regression analysis showed the microsystem accounted for 17.2%, the mesosystem accounted for 7.1%, and the macrosystem accounted for 11.4%. CONCLUSION: The health promotion lifestyle of the elderly in Hebei Province was at the lower limit of good level. Among them, exercise frequency, children's attention to the elderly health, and pre-retirement occupation played a major role in relation to the health-promoting lifestyle of the elderly. Hence, it needs the joint action of individuals, families, and society to promote the elderly to adopt the health promotion lifestyle and realize healthy aging.


Subject(s)
Frailty , Child , Humans , Aged , Cross-Sectional Studies , Frailty/epidemiology , Ecosystem , Life Style , Healthy Lifestyle
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL