Identifying non-genetic factors associated with trigger finger.

BACKGROUND: The non-genetic factors predisposing to trigger finger (TF) have mostly been characterised in small studies from individual institutions. Here, we aimed to provide a more complete picture of TF and its associations. METHODOLOGY: This case-control study used cross-sectional data from the UK Biobank population-based cohort to identify and determine the strength of associations of phenotypic variables with TF. We performed multivariable logistic regression of a multitude of phenotypic factors associated with TF. RESULTS: We identified 2250 individuals with medical and surgical diagnostic codes for TF, and 398,495 controls. TF was found to be significantly associated with age (OR 1.04, 95% CI 1.03-1.04, P < 2.23×10-308), female sex (OR 1.22, 95% CI 1.08-1.39, P = 2.35×10-3), body mass index (OR 1.10, 95% CI 1.04-1.16, P = 5.52×10-4), carpal tunnel syndrome (OR 9.59, 95% CI 8.68-10.59, P < 2.23×10-308), Dupuytren's disease (OR 4.89, 95% CI 4.06-5.89, P < 2.23×10-308), diabetes mellitus without complications (OR 1.35, 95% CI 1.15-1.58, P = 2.03×10-4) and with complications (OR 2.46, 95% CI 1.90-3.17, P = 4.98×10-12), HbA1c (OR 1.01, 95% CI 1.01-1.02, P = 8.99×10-9), hypothyroidism (OR 1.24, 95% CI 1.07-1.43, P = 4.75×10-3) and rheumatoid arthritis (OR 1.33, 95% CI 1.06-1.68, P = 0.014). CONCLUSION: Our results provide evidence supporting the well-known risk factors such as diabetes mellitus, carpal tunnel syndrome, age and female sex. Furthermore, we can confirm putative associations such as hypothyroidism, obesity and rheumatoid arthritis, while providing evidence against others such as hypertension and hyperlipidaemia. A novel finding arising from this study is the strong association with Dupuytren's disease. Our study design allowed us to identify these associations as being independent from carpal tunnel syndrome, thereby indicating a shared pathophysiology between this disease and TF.

Absorbable Sutures and Telemedicine for Patients Undergoing Trigger Finger Release.

Background In the setting of the COVID-19 pandemic, the development of care processes that reduce the need for in-person clinic visits while maintaining low complication rates is needed. The purpose of this study is to assess the outcomes of patients undergoing trigger finger release with various suture and follow-up visit types to assess the feasibility of shifting towards telemedicine-based follow-up protocols. Methods A retrospective review of 329 patients undergoing trigger finger release was performed. Patients were classified based on whether or not they received in-office follow-ups; whether they received absorbable or non-absorbable sutures; and whether they were treated using a telemedicine and absorbable suture protocol or other combination of sutures and follow-ups. Univariate statistics were performed to compare outcomes between groups. Results Patients who did not undergo in-office follow-up were more likely to experience residual stiffness or contracture (11.4% vs. 4.1%; p=0.033) but had no significant differences in 30-day reoperation, emergency department (ED) returns, wound complaints, and Quick DASH (Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand) scores. When comparing chromic absorbable sutures to non-absorbable sutures, those with absorbable sutures were significantly more likely to have telemedicine visits but were also more likely to have wound complaints (17.9% vs. 8.5%; p=0.022). There was no significant difference in two- and six-week pain scores, 30-day reoperation, ED returns, residual symptoms, and Quick DASH scores. When comparing patients treated using the absorbable suture and telemedicine protocol with those receiving any other type of suture and postoperative follow-up, no significant differences in any postoperative clinical outcome measures were observed. Conclusion The results of this study demonstrate that the use of an absorbable suture and telemedicine protocol for patients undergoing trigger finger release yields similar outcomes as traditional methods of care. However, the use of absorbable sutures may result in decreased patient satisfaction with surgical wound healing.

Flexor Digitorum Superficialis Excision for Trigger Finger - A Systematic Literature Review.

Background: Division of one or more slips of the flexor digitorum superficialis (FDS) tendon has been posited as an effective surgical modality for advanced or recurrent trigger finger. This may be an effective approach among patients with diabetes or rheumatoid arthritis, or in those with fixed flexion deformities who have poor outcomes from A1 pulley release alone. However, there is limited evidence regarding the effectiveness of this procedure. The role of this study was to systematically review the evidence on functional outcomes and safety of partial or complete FDS resection in the management of trigger finger. Methods: A systematic review was performed according to PRISMA guidelines. PubMed, Cochrane CENTRAL and Ovid Medline databases were electronically queried from their inception until February 2022. English language papers were included if they reported original data on postoperative outcomes and complications following resection of one or more slips of FDS for adult trigger finger. Results: Seven articles were eligible for inclusion, encompassing 420 fingers in 290 patients. All included studies were retrospective. Isolated ulnar slip FDS resection was the most described surgery. Mean postoperative fixed flexion deformity at the proximal interphalangeal joint was 6.0° compared to 31.5° preoperatively, and the proportion of patients with fixed flexion deformity reduced by 58%. Mean postoperative total active motion was 228.7°. Recurrence was seen in 4.7% of digits, and complications occurred in 11.2% of cases. No post-surgical ulnar drift or swan neck deformities were observed. Conclusions: FDS resection for long-standing trigger finger, or in diabetic or rheumatoid populations, is an effective and safe technique with low rates of recurrence. Prospective and comparative studies of this technique would be beneficial. Level of Evidence: Level III (Therapeutic).

Orthotic intervention options to non-surgically manage adult and pediatric trigger finger: A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: The design and efficacy of orthotic intervention to non-surgically manage adult and pediatric trigger finger vary widely. PURPOSE: To identify types of orthoses (including relative motion), effectiveness, and outcome measurements used to non-surgically manage adult and pediatric trigger finger. STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review. METHODS: The study was undertaken according to The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses 2020 Statement and registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews Registry, number CRD42022322515. Two independent authors electronically and manually searched, and screened 4 databases; selected articles following pre-set eligibility criteria; assessed the quality of the evidence using the Structured Effectiveness for Quality Evaluation of Study; and extracted the data. RESULTS: Of the 11 articles included, 2 involved pediatric trigger finger and 9 adult trigger finger. Orthoses for pediatric trigger finger positioned finger(s), hand, and/or wrist of children in neutral extension. In adults, a single joint was immobilized by the orthosis, blocking either the metacarpophalangeal joint or the proximal or distal interphalangeal joint. All studies reported positive results with statistically significant improvements and medium to large effect size to almost every outcome measure, including the Number of Triggering Events in Ten Active Fist 1.37, Frequency of Triggering from 2.07 to 2.54, Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Outcome Measure from 0.46 to 1.88, Visual Analogue Pain Scale from 0.92 to 2.00, and Numeric Rating Pain Scale from 0.49 to 1.31. Severity tools and patient-rated outcome measures were used with the validity and reliability of some unknown. CONCLUSIONS: Orthoses are effective for non-surgical management of pediatric and adult trigger finger using various orthotic options. Although used in practice, evidence for the use of relative motion orthosis is absent. High-quality studies based on sound research questions and design using reliable and valid outcome measures are needed.

Trigger Wrist Caused by a Rheumatoid Nodule on the Flexor Pollicis Longus Tendon.

Background: Trigger wrist is a rare condition. Previously reported cases have involved nodules or ganglion cysts affecting flexor digitorum profundus tendons; however, we found no reported cases of trigger wrist caused by a rheumatoid nodule on the flexor pollicis longus tendon. Case Report: A 57-year-old female presented with the complaint of chronic triggering of the right thumb and numbness in her fingers consistent with carpal tunnel syndrome. Corticosteroid injection did not provide symptom relief, so the patient was scheduled for surgery. A 3 × 1.5-cm lesion was removed from the flexor pollicis longus tendon distal to the carpal tunnel. Histopathologic examination demonstrated that the lesion was a rheumatoid nodule. Conclusion: Patients with rheumatoid arthritis who present with trigger finger symptoms of the thumb with concomitant carpal tunnel symptoms require careful evaluation to rule out trigger wrist before the condition progresses to Mannerfelt lesion.

Musculoskeletal complications in patients with diabetes mellitus.

Musculoskeletal conditions are common in patients with diabetes. Several musculoskeletal disorders are viewed as chronic complications of diabetes because epidemiological studies have revealed high correlations between such complications and diabetes, but the pathophysiological links with diabetes remains unclear. Genetic predispositions, shared risk factors, microvascular impairments, progressive accumulation of advanced glycation end-products, and diabetic neuropathy may underlie the development of musculoskeletal disorders. Musculoskeletal complications of diabetics have received less attention than life-threatening microvascular or macrovascular complications. Here, we review several diabetic musculoskeletal complications with a focus on the clinical importance of early recognition and management, which would improve quality of life and physical function.

Patterns of Involvement of Digits in Patients with Multiple Trigger Digits: A Retrospective Study.

Background: The involvement of digits in patients with multiple trigger digits often displays specific patterns. We aimed to determine the patterns of involvement of digits in multiple trigger digits and their association with patient-related factors and compare them to those of patients with a single trigger digit. Methods: All patients with trigger digits treated over a 2-year period were retrospectively examined in June 2020. Data regarding the age at occurrence of initial trigger digit, sex, occupation, presence of diabetes mellitus, carpal tunnel syndrome and de Quervain disease, and hand dominance was determined. The data obtained from patients with multiple trigger digits was compared with those with a single trigger digit. Additionally, we investigated the patterns of involvement of the first two affected digits in patients with multiple trigger digits and their association with patient-related factors and compared them to those in patients with a single trigger digit. Results: Three hundred and eighty-seven and 577 patients with multiple and single trigger digits, respectively, were studied. Their median age was 60 (range: 17-92) years. The incidence of concomitant diabetes mellitus was 150% higher in patients with multiple trigger digits than in those with a single trigger digit. Symmetric occurrence and adjacent occurrence patterns were observed in 42.4 % and 28.4% of the 387 patients, respectively. Initial onset in the fifth and sixth decades of life, female sex and a time lag between occurrences were significantly associated with symmetric occurrence. Male sex and simultaneous occurrence in two digits were significantly associated with adjacent occurrence. Diabetes mellitus was not associated with each occurrence pattern. Conclusions: We have confirmed the presence of two involvement patterns in patients with multiple trigger digits: symmetric and adjacent. Our data will help in the prevention, early detection and management of multiple trigger digits. Level of Evidence: Level III (Therapeutic).

Ultra-minimally Invasive Sonographically-guided Trigger Digit Release: An External Pilot Study.

Objectives: The most common surgical option for releasing the first annular pulley in trigger digit (TD) is classic open surgery followed by blind percutaneous release. However, they have been related to major complications and incomplete releases, respectively. Intrasheath sonographically-guided first annular pulley release has recently been shown to be safe and effective in every digit. The objectives of this pilot study were to preliminary compare clinically an intrasheath sonographically-guided first annular pulley release versus a classic open technique and to evaluate the feasibility of a future clinical trial in patients with TDs. Methods: Thirty patients were randomized 1:1 in an external pilot study comparing the two surgical techniques: a percutaneous sonographically-guided release performed through a 1 mm incision using a hook knife versus a classic open surgery with a 1 cm incision. Inclusion criteria were primary TD grade III (Froimson). We defined success if primary (safety and efficacy) and secondary (recruitment rates, compliance, completion, treatment blinding, personnel resources, and sample size calculation for the clinical trial) objectives could be matched. We registered the grip strength, the QuickDASH score and a set of postoperative clinical variables at one, three, and six weeks and at three months. We calculated the sample size for the clinical trial using the QuickDASH at the end of the follow-up. Outcomes assessors were blinded. Results: All patients in both groups showed resolution of their symptoms with no associated complications or relapses. Secondary feasibility objectives were matched: 76.9% of eligible patients were included in the study, 3.3% refused randomization, 20 patients per month were recruited, 100% received blinded treatment, 98.5% showed compliance, and 100% completed the study. The sample size for a future clinical trial was 84 patients. There were no differences in grip strength. The intrasheath sonographically-guided first annular pulley release showed significantly better QuickDASH scores, until the sixth postoperative week. Conclusions: The intrasheath sonographically-guided first annular pulley release is safe and efficacious, and shows a trend toward clinical superiority versus the classic open procedure, which should be confirmed with a clinical trial. Our study shows that a randomized clinical trial is feasible.

A New Test for Trigger Finger: The Lenox Independent Flexion Test.

Background: The diagnosis of trigger finger (TF) in patients who do not demonstrate triggering at presentation can be challenging. We have been using a new test for TF - the Lenox Independent Flexion Test (LIFT). The aim of this study is to determine the sensitivity of LIFT in diagnosing TF. We hypothesise that LIFT will be more sensitive compared to the classic physical exam finding of triggering or locking with active range of motion (AROM). Methods: This is a prospective study of consecutive patients with TF over a 5-month period. Patients with the onset of trigger following trauma and trigger of the thumb were excluded. Patients were examined for tenderness over the first annular (A1) pulley, triggering or locking with AROM, and the LIFT was performed. A two-proportion test was used to determine whether the LIFT was more sensitive than triggering with AROM. Results: The study included 85 patients with 118 TFs. The average age of patients was 63 years and the study included 49 women. There were 69, 49, 0 and 0 grade I, II, III and IV TF, respectively. 108 fingers (92%) had a history of catching or locking of the affected digit, 110 (93%) had tenderness over the A1 pulley, 49 (44%) had triggering or locking with AROM and 102 (91%) had a positive LIFT. The LIFT was found to be more sensitive when compared to triggering with AROM (p < .001). Conclusion: The LIFT is more sensitive than triggering with AROM in the diagnosis of trigger digits. This test is especially useful in the diagnosis of TF in patients who do not have triggering at presentation. Level of Evidence: Level III (Diagnostic).

Paediatric Trigger-Locked Thumb.

Paediatric trigger-locked thumb (PT-LT) is a common paediatric thumb condition. It is an acquired flexion deformity of the interphalangeal joint because of a size mismatch between an enlarged flexor pollicis longus tendon and a stenotic oblique pulley. It may present clinically as paediatric locked thumb which is more common or infrequently as paediatric trigger thumb. Paediatric locked thumb is classified into two types based on the presence of metacarpophalangeal joint (MCPJ) hyperextension. Type I does not have MCPJ hyperextension, whereas type II is associated with MCPJ hyperextension. The treatment of PT-LT is determined by the patient's age, time of onset, presentation, and type. Treatment modalities are observation, splinting, therapy, or surgery. Surgery involves dividing the A1 pulley and, most importantly, part of the oblique pulley. Level of Evidence: V (Therapeutic).

Onset of Trigger Finger after Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Surgery: Assessment of Open and Endoscopic Techniques.

Objective The present study aimed to determine the frequency of trigger finger (TF) onset after surgery for carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) using an open (OT) or an endoscopic technique (ET). As a secondary endpoint, the present study also compared paresthesia remission and residual pain rates in patients submitted to both techniques. Methods Trigger finger onset and remission rates of paresthesia and pain at the median nerve territory was verified prospectively in a series of adult patients submitted to an OT procedure ( n = 34). These findings were compared with a retrospective cohort submitted to ET ( n = 33) by the same surgical team. Patients were evaluated with a structured questionnaire in a return visit at least 6 months after surgery. Results Sixty-seven patients were evaluated. There was no difference regarding trigger finger onset (OT, 26.5% versus ET, 27.3%; p = 0.94) and pain (OT, 76.5% versus ET, 84.8%; p = 0.38). Patients submitted to OT had fewer paresthesia complaints compared with those operated using ET (OT, 5.9% versus ET, 24.2%; p = 0.03). Conclusions In our series, the surgical technique did not influence trigger finger onset and residual pain rates. Patients submitted to OT had less complaints of residual postoperative paresthesia.

Non-Traumatic Snapping Tendon on the Dorsal Aspect of the Thumb: A Diagnostic Challenge.

A snapping tendon on the dorsal aspect of the thumb is a rare condition as opposed to the common triggering on the volar aspect of the thumb. This condition is known as triggering of the extensor pollicis longus (EPL). A 21-year-old female presented with a clicking or snapping sensation that was felt on the dorsum of her thumb when it is extended. There was no history of trauma. She worked in an ice-cream parlor with repetitive scooping ice-cream motions. Her triggering immediately resolved on releasing the EPL fascia ulnar to Lister's tubercle. Upon wake-up surgery, we could immediately confirm this. We recommend dynamic ultrasound as an investigation and do not recommend MRI. The surgical method of choice is either wake-up surgery or wide-awake local anesthesia no tourniquet (WALANT) surgery.

Onset of Trigger Finger after Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Surgery: Assessment of Open and Endoscopic Techniques / Frequência do aparecimento de dedo em gatilho no pós-operatório da síndrome do túnel do carpo em duas técnicas cirúrgicas: Aberta e endoscópica

Abstract Objective The present study aimed to determine the frequency of trigger finger (TF) onset after surgery for carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) using an open (OT) or an endoscopic technique (ET). As a secondary endpoint, the present study also compared paresthesia remission and residual pain rates in patients submitted to both techniques. Methods Trigger finger onset and remission rates of paresthesia and pain at the median nerve territory was verified prospectively in a series of adult patients submitted to an OT procedure (n = 34). These findings were compared with a retrospective cohort submitted to ET (n = 33) by the same surgical team. Patients were evaluated with a structured questionnaire in a return visit at least 6 months after surgery. Results Sixty-seven patients were evaluated. There was no difference regarding trigger finger onset (OT, 26.5% versus ET, 27.3%; p = 0.94) and pain (OT, 76.5% versus ET, 84.8%; p = 0.38). Patients submitted to OT had fewer paresthesia complaints compared with those operated using ET (OT, 5.9% versus ET, 24.2%; p = 0.03). Conclusions In our series, the surgical technique did not influence trigger finger onset and residual pain rates. Patients submitted to OT had less complaints of residual postoperative paresthesia.

Resumo Objetivo Determinar a frequência do aparecimento de dedo em gatilho (DG) no pós-operatório da síndrome do túnel do carpo (STC) em duas técnicas: aberta (TA) e endoscópica (TE). Como desfecho secundário, comparar as taxas de remissão da parestesia e dor residual entre as duas técnicas. Métodos De forma prospectiva, verificamos o aparecimento de dedo em gatilho e taxa de remissão da parestesia e dor no território do nervo mediano em série de pacientes adultos operados pela TA (n = 34). Comparamos com coorte retrospectiva operada pela TE (n = 33), pela mesma equipe de cirurgiões. A avaliação dos pacientes ocorreu por meio de questionário estruturado em consulta de retorno, com mínimo de 6 meses de pós-operatório. Resultados Sessenta e sete pacientes foram avaliados. Não houve diferença quanto ao aparecimento de dedo em gatilho (TA, 26,5% versus TE, 27,3%; p = 0,94) e dor (TA, 76,5% versus TE, 84.8%; p = 0,38). Os pacientes operados pela TA apresentaram menos queixas de parestesia do que os operados pela TE (TA 5,9% versus TE 24,2%; p = 0,03). Conclusões Em nossa série, a técnica cirúrgica não influenciou o aparecimento de dedos em gatilho e dor residual. Os pacientes operados pela técnica aberta apresentaram menos queixa de parestesia residual pós-operatória.

Closed Traumatic A2 Through A4 Pulley Rupture and Flexor Digitorum Superficialis Avulsion Treated With Reconstruction.

Background: Multiple closed spontaneous pulley ruptures are rare injuries and require surgical reconstruction to prevent functional deficits. Pulley rupture combined with avulsion of the flexor digitorum superficialis (FDS) tendon is an even more uncommon occurrence. Case Report: We describe a closed traumatic annular 2 (A2) through annular 4 (A4) pulley rupture with avulsion of the FDS tendon. This uniquely associated pathology was treated with a complex surgical reconstruction that corrected flexion contracture and tendon bowstringing in the left long finger. The desired outcome was achieved through A2 and A4 pulley reconstruction using an autologous palmaris longus tendon graft with FDS tendon excision and proximal interphalangeal joint capsulotomy. Conclusion: Multiple pulley rupture is not commonly combined with FDS avulsion, and treatment of this injury requires careful surgical planning based on pulley biomechanics to maximize postoperative function.

Physical modalities for the conservative treatment of wrist and hand's tenosynovitis: A systematic review.

OBJECTIVES: The management of wrist and hand's tenosynovitis remains challenging and needs to be individualized. Physical modalities are accepted among conservative treatments, but there is currently no systematic assessment of their role and efficacy. The aim of this review is to analyze the literature including studies dealing with the use of physical modalities in De Quervain disease, Dupuytren disease and trigger finger, in order to obtain indications for everyday clinical practice. METHODS: A systematic literature search of the following databases was conducted: MEDLINE (through PubMed), Cochrane Library, PEDro and Scopus. All kind of papers, except for case reports and case series, were included, due to the small amount of scientific evidence in literature about this topic. The inclusion criteria were papers regarding the effectiveness of conservative treatment with physical modalities of adult humans affected by De Quervain disease, Dupuytren disease and trigger finger. The review included articles in English language published before 10 May 2020. The exclusion criteria were papers whose topic were surgery or conservative treatment with therapeutic tools different from physical modalities for hand and wrist's tenosynovitis. RESULTS: The literature search identified 2422 papers, but only 15 were included in this review. While 10 of the 15 studies (66.6%) were RCTs, only 2 had a lower risk of bias according to the Cochrane library assessment tool. For the conservative treatment of De Quervain disease 7 papers were found, studying ultrasound therapy, low level laser therapy, phonoporesis, and anodyne therapy, alone or associated. For Dupuytren disease 3 papers were found, studying extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT), temperature controlled high energy adjustable multi-mode emission laser, electron beam therapy and radiofrequency. For trigger finger 5 papers were found, studying ESWT and ultrasound therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Laser therapy and therapeutic ultrasound were the most used and effective physical therapies for De Quervain tenosynovitis. ESWT was found the most efficient and safe therapy for Dupuytren disease; radiotherapy, electron beam therapy, targeted radiofrequency and laser therapy could be promising therapeutic options at Dupuytren's onset. ESWT turned out to be the most frequent physical mean used for functional improvement and pain control in trigger finger. However, more high-quality studies are still needed to further define evidence-based practice for patients with trigger finger, Dupuytren disease, and De Quervain disease.

Dedo pulgar en gatillo bilateral, tratamiento quirúrgico y conservador en paciente de 4 años de edad / Bilateral trigger finger, surgical and conservative treatment in a 4 year old patient / Polegar em gatilho bilateral, tratamento cirúrgico e conservador em paciente de quatro anos de idade

Introducción. El dedo en gatillo es una anomalía infrecuente en niños que afecta principalmente al dedo pulgar, de etiología desconocida. El manejo puede ser conservador o quirúrgico. Reporte de caso. Paciente pediátrica escolar de 4 años y 7 meses de edad es remitida al servicio de cirugía plástica por deformidad en flexión fija del pulgar derecho, de 4 meses de evolución asociada a nódulo palpable. Se interviene quirúrgicamente de forma efectiva, sin complicaciones, secuelas ni recurrencia. Discusión. La paciente fue manejada quirúrgicamente de forma efectiva Se hizo un seguimiento durante 3 años con una evolución satisfactoria, teniendo una recuperación total de la función del pulgar, sin secuelas y adecuada adaptabilidad al medio. Conclusión. Este artículo tiene como objetivo presentar un caso clínico que busca llamar la atención sobre las indicaciones del tratamiento conservador versus quirúrgico que existen en la literatura, corresponde a una paciente pediátrica de nuestro medio con dedo pulgar en gatillo bilateral, su manejo y los resultados postoperatorios. El dedo pulgar en gatillo pediátrico tiene una baja prevalencia en el mundo. No hay estudios de incidencia ni prevalencia en nuestro medio. La edad de presentación es variable, los signos y síntomas no son iguales a los del adulto, el compromiso puede ser bilateral, su diagnóstico es clínico y el tratamiento quirúrgico, dependiendo del grado de compromiso, puede ser el más efectivo. Cómo citar: Bretón Gómez GA, Vargas Rueda JJ, Ardila Forero PA, López Villegas A. Dedo pulgar en gatillo bilateral, tratamiento quirúrgico y conservador en paciente de 4 años de edad. MedUNAB. 2020;23(1):131-136. doi:10.29375/01237047.3616

Introduction. Trigger finger is a rare anomaly in children; it is of unknown etiology and mainly affects the thumb. Management may be conservative or surgical. Case report. Pediatric patient of 4 years and 7 months of age is referred to plastic surgery service for fixed flexion deformity of the right thumb, after 4 months of evolution associated with a palpable nodule. It is successfully intervened surgically, without complications, sequels or recurrence. Discussion. The patient was effectively treated via surgery. Follow-up was carried out for three years with satisfactory evolution, showing full recovery of the function of the thumb, with no after-effects and with adequate adaptability to the environment. Conclusion. The objective of this article is to present a clinical case that aims to draw attention to the indications for conservative versus surgical treatment existing in the literature, corresponding to a pediatric patient from our milieu with a bilateral trigger finger, its treatment and postoperative results. Pediatric trigger finger has low prevalence in the world. There are no incidence or prevalence studies in the cases that were reviewed. The age at which it arises is variable; the signs and symptoms are not the same as those of adults; involvement may be bilateral; diagnosis is clinical and surgery may be the most effective treatment, depending on the degree of involvement. Cómo citar: Bretón Gómez GA, Vargas Rueda JJ, Ardila Forero PA, López Villegas A. Dedo pulgar en gatillo bilateral, tratamiento quirúrgico y conservador en paciente de 4 años de edad. MedUNAB. 2020;23(1):131-136. doi:10.29375/01237047.3616

Introdução. O dedo em gatilho é uma anomalia incomum em crianças, que afeta principalmente o polegar, de etiologia desconhecida. O tratamento pode ser conservador ou cirúrgico. Relato de caso. Paciente pediátrica de quatro anos e sete meses de idade é encaminhada ao serviço de cirurgia plástica para deformidade em flexão fixa do polegar direito, com quatro meses de evolução associada a nódulo palpável. Foi tratada cirurgicamente de forma eficaz, sem complicações, sequelas ou recorrência. Discussão. A paciente foi tratada cirurgicamente de forma eficaz. Foi feito um acompanhamento por três anos com uma evolução satisfatória, com recuperação total da função do polegar, sem sequelas e adaptabilidade adequada ao ambiente. Conclusão. Este artigo tem como objetivo apresentar um caso clínico que busca chamar a atenção para as indicações do tratamento conservador versus cirúrgico, existentes na literatura, que corresponde a uma paciente pediátrica em nosso meio com um polegar de gatilho bilateral, seu manejo e resultados pós-operatórios. O polegar em gatilho pediátrico tem uma baixa prevalência no mundo. Não há estudos de incidência ou prevalência nos casos consultados. A idade de apresentação é variável, os sinais e sintomas não são iguais aos do adulto, o comprometimento pode ser bilateral, o diagnóstico é clínico e o tratamento cirúrgico, dependendo do grau de comprometimento, pode ser o mais eficaz. Cómo citar: Bretón Gómez GA, Vargas Rueda JJ, Ardila Forero PA, López Villegas A. Dedo pulgar en gatillo bilateral, tratamiento quirúrgico y conservador en paciente de 4 años de edad. MedUNAB. 2020;23(1):131-136. doi:10.29375/01237047.3616

Stenosing tenosynovitis : Evaluation of percutaneous release with a specially designed needle vs. open surgery.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of conventional open surgery and percutaneous release with a specially designed needle for treating stenosing tenosynovitis in terms of cure, relapse and complication rates. METHODS: In this study 89 fingers from 76 patients were randomly assigned and allocated to one of the treatment groups. A total of 37 patients were treated with open surgery in group 1 and 39 patients with percutaneous release using a specially designed needle in group 2. A patient-based 4-inch visual analogue scale (VAS), Quinnell grading (QG), disability of arm shoulder and hand (DASH) score and finger total joint range of motion (FTROM) score were evaluated before treatment and after 7, 30 and 180 days. When finger QG scores were equal or greater than 2 points at follow-up at 180 days this was defined as recurrence.. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the two groups (P > 0.05) in terms of VAS, DASH and QG scores and the degree of FTROM. At 7 days all the data were significantly different (p < 0.05) compared with preoperative data, 30 days was significantly different (p < 0.05) compared with 7 days while at 180 days no significant differences could be found (p > 0.05) compared with 30 days. The recurrence rate in group 1 was 4.65% and 6.55% in group 2. CONCLUSION: The percutaneous release and open surgery methods displayed similar effectiveness regarding the cure and recurrence of trigger finger disorder. The use of a specially designed needle for release is a safe and reliable method.

Upper extremity impairments in type 1 diabetes with long duration; common problems with great impact on daily life.

PURPOSE: To investigate the prevalence, activity limitations and potential risk factors of upper extremity impairments in type 1 diabetes in comparison to controls. METHODS: In a cross-sectional population-based study in the southeast of Sweden, patients with type 1 diabetes <35 years at onset, duration ≥20 years, <67 years old and matched controls were invited to answer a questionnaire on upper extremity impairments and activity limitations and to take blood samples. RESULTS: Seven hundred and seventy-three patients (ages 50 ± 10 years, diabetes duration 35 ± 10 years) and 708 controls (ages 54 ± 9 years) were included. Shoulder pain and stiffness, hand paraesthesia and finger impairments were common in patients with a prevalence of 28-48%, which was 2-4-folds higher than in controls. Compared to controls, the patients had more bilateral impairments, often had coexistence of several upper extremity impairments, and in the presence of impairments, reported more pronounced activity limitations. Female gender (1.72 (1.066-2.272), p = 0.014), longer duration (1.046 (1.015-1.077), p = 0.003), higher body mass index (1.08 (1.017-1.147), p = 0.013) and HbA1c (1.029 (1.008-1.05), p = 0.007) were associated with upper extremity impairments. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to controls, patients with type 1 diabetes have a high prevalence of upper extremity impairments, often bilateral, which are strongly associated with activity limitations. Recognising these in clinical practise is crucial, and improved preventative, therapeutic and rehabilitative interventions are needed. Implications for rehabilitation Upper extremity impairments affecting the shoulder, hand and fingers are common in patients with type 1 diabetes, the prevalence being 2-4-fold higher compared to non-diabetic persons. Patients with diabetes type 1 with upper extremity impairments have more pronounced limitations in daily activities compared to controls with similar impairments. Recognising upper extremity impairments and activity limitations are important and improved preventive, therapeutic and rehabilitation methods are needed.

Establishing an Efficient Care Paradigm for Trigger Finger.

BACKGROUND: To identify the time course for efficacy of corticosteroid injections in the treatment of trigger finger. METHODS: A prospective single-center observational study was conducted, consisting of 38 patients with 41 trigger digits that were injected. Enrolled patients completed an initial Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) questionnaire to determine the severity of their symptoms. Following the injection, patients were contacted at scheduled time points for up to 12 weeks to determine if, and when, objective resolution of symptoms occurred. Patients who received additional treatment, such as a second injection or surgery, and those who did not have objective relief of symptoms by 12 weeks were classified as failed. Upon symptom resolution or injection failure, patients were given a DASH exit questionnaire. RESULTS: 30 of 41 injected trigger digits resolved and 11 failed treatment with a single corticosteroid injection. The latest that any study participant experienced resolution of symptoms was 69 days. At 38 days, the rate of resolution of the study population slowed significantly. CONCLUSIONS: Although symptomatic resolution of trigger finger from a single corticosteroid injection can occur early on, a follow-up of 4 weeks (28 days) does not allow enough time for symptom resolution. The earliest a surgeon and patient should consider a secondary treatment is at 38 days. After 69 days without resolution, both surgeon and patient can be confident that further treatment is needed.