2024 update: European consensus statement on gene therapy for spinal muscular atrophy.

Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is one of the most common genetic diseases and was, until recently, a leading genetic cause of infant mortality. Three disease-modifying treatments have dramatically changed the disease trajectories and outcome for severely affected infants (SMA type 1), especially when initiated in the presymptomatic phase. One of these treatments is the adeno-associated viral vector 9 (AAV9) based gene therapy onasemnogene abeparvovec (Zolgensma®), which is delivered systemically and has been approved by the European Medicine Agency for SMA patients with up to three copies of the SMN2 gene or with the clinical presentation of SMA type 1. While this broad indication provides flexibility in patient selection, it also raises concerns about the risk-benefit ratio for patients with limited or no evidence supporting treatment. In 2020, we convened a European neuromuscular expert working group to support the rational use of onasemnogene abeparvovec, employing a modified Delphi methodology. After three years, we have assembled a similar yet larger group of European experts who assessed the emerging evidence of onasemnogene abeparvovec's role in treating older and heavier SMA patients, integrating insights from recent clinical trials and real-world evidence. This effort resulted in 12 consensus statements, with strong consensus achieved on 9 and consensus on the remaining 3, reflecting the evolving role of onasemnogene abeparvovec in treating SMA.

Improved therapeutic approach for spinal muscular atrophy via ubiquitination-resistant survival motor neuron variant.

BACKGROUND: Zolgensma is a gene-replacement therapy that has led to a promising treatment for spinal muscular atrophy (SMA). However, clinical trials of Zolgensma have raised two major concerns: insufficient therapeutic effects and adverse events. In a recent clinical trial, 30% of patients failed to achieve motor milestones despite pre-symptomatic treatment. In addition, more than 20% of patients showed hepatotoxicity due to excessive virus dosage, even after the administration of an immunosuppressant. Here, we aimed to test whether a ubiquitination-resistant variant of survival motor neuron (SMN), SMNK186R, has improved therapeutic effects for SMA compared with wild-type SMN (SMNWT). METHODS: A severe SMA mouse model, SMA type 1.5 (Smn-/-; SMN2+/+; SMN∆7+/-) mice, was used to compare the differences in therapeutic efficacy between AAV9-SMNWT and AAV9-SMNK186R. All animals were injected within Postnatal Day (P) 1 through a facial vein or cerebral ventricle. RESULTS: AAV9-SMNK186R-treated mice showed increased lifespan, body weight, motor neuron number, muscle weight and functional improvement in motor functions as compared with AAV9-SMNWT-treated mice. Lifespan increased by more than 10-fold in AAV9-SMNK186R-treated mice (144.8 ± 26.11 days) as compared with AAV9-SMNWT-treated mice (26.8 ± 1.41 days). AAV9-SMNK186R-treated mice showed an ascending weight pattern, unlike AAV9-SMNWT-treated mice, which only gained weight until P20 up to 5 g on average. Several motor function tests showed the improved therapeutic efficacy of SMNK186R. In the negative geotaxis test, AAV9-SMNK186R-treated mice turned their bodies in an upward direction successfully, unlike AAV9-SMNWT-treated mice, which failed to turn upwards from around P23. Hind limb clasping phenotype was rarely observed in AAV9-SMNK186R-treated mice, unlike AAV9-SMNWT-treated mice that showed clasping phenotype for more than 20 out of 30 s. At this point, the number of motor neurons (1.5-fold) and the size of myofibers (2.1-fold) were significantly increased in AAV9-SMNK186R-treated mice compared with AAV9-SMNWT-treated mice without prominent neurotoxicity. AAV9-SMNK186R had fewer liver defects compared with AAV9-SMNWT, as judged by increased proliferation of hepatocytes (P < 0.0001) and insulin-like growth factor-1 production (P < 0.0001). Especially, low-dose AAV9-SMNK186R (nine-fold) also reduced clasping time compared with SMNWT. CONCLUSIONS: SMNK186R will provide improved therapeutic efficacy in patients with severe SMA with insufficient therapeutic efficacy. Low-dose treatment of SMA patients with AAV9-SMNK186R can reduce the adverse events of Zolgensma. Collectively, SMNK186R has value as a new treatment for SMA that improves treatment effectiveness and reduces adverse events simultaneously.

Efficacy and safety of onasemnogene abeparvovec in children with spinal muscular atrophy type 1: real-world evidence from 6 infusion centres in the United Kingdom.

Background: Real-world data on the efficacy and safety of onasemnogene abeparvovec (OA) in spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) are needed, especially to overcome uncertainties around its use in older and heavier children. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of OA in patients with SMA type 1 in the UK, including patients ≥2 years old and weighing ≥13.5 kg. Methods: This observational cohort study used data from patients with genetically confirmed SMA type 1 treated with OA between May 2021 and January 2023, at 6 infusion centres in the United Kingdom. Functional outcomes were assessed using age-appropriate functional scales. Safety analyses included review of liver function, platelet count, cardiac assessments, and steroid requirements. Findings: Ninety-nine patients (45 SMA therapy-naïve) were treated with OA (median age at infusion: 10 [range, 0.6-89] months; median weight: 7.86 [range, 3.2-20.2] kg; duration of follow-up: 3-22 months). After OA infusion, mean ± SD change in CHOP-INTEND score was 11.0 ± 10.3 with increased score in 66/78 patients (84.6%); patients aged <6 months had a 13.9 points higher gain in CHOP-INTEND score than patients ≥2 years (95% CI, 6.8-21.0; P < 0.001). Asymptomatic thrombocytopenia (71/99 patients; 71.7%), asymptomatic troponin-I elevation (30/89 patients; 33.7%) and transaminitis (87/99 patients; 87.9%) were reported. No thrombotic microangiopathy was observed. Median steroid treatment duration was 97 (range, 28-548) days with dose doubled in 35/99 patients (35.4%). There were 22.5-fold increased odds of having a transaminase peak >100 U/L (95% CI, 2.3-223.7; P = 0.008) and 21.2-fold increased odds of steroid doubling, as per treatment protocol (95% CI, 2.2-209.2; P = 0.009) in patients weighing ≥13.5 kg versus <8.5 kg. Weight at infusion was positively correlated with steroid treatment duration (r = 0.43; P < 0.001). Worsening transaminitis, despite doubling of oral prednisolone, led to treatment with intravenous methylprednisolone in 5 children. Steroid-sparing immunosuppressants were used in 5 children to enable steroid weaning. Two deaths apparently unrelated to OA were reported. Interpretation: OA led to functional improvements and was well tolerated with no persistent clinical complications, including in older and heavier patients. Funding: Novartis Innovative Therapies AG provided a grant for independent medical writing services.

Case report: A case of spinal muscular atrophy in a preterm infant: risks and benefits of treatment.

Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is a neuromuscular genetic disorder caused by the loss of lower motor neurons leading to progressive muscle weakness and atrophy. With the rise of novel therapies and early diagnosis on newborn screening (NBS), the natural history of SMA has been evolving. Earlier therapeutic interventions can modify disease outcomes and improve survival. The role of treatment in infants born preterm is an important question given the importance of early intervention. In this study, we discuss the case of an infant born at 32 weeks who was diagnosed with SMA on NBS and was treated with Spinraza® (Nusinersen) and Zolgensma® (Onasemnogene abeparvovec-xioi) within the first 2 months of life. With the scarce evidence that currently exists, clinicians should be aware of the efficacy and safety impact of early therapy particularly in the preterm infant.

Gene Therapy for Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA): A Review of Current Challenges and Safety Considerations for Onasemnogene Abeparvovec (Zolgensma).

Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA) is a genetic disease that causes weakness and wasting in the voluntary muscles of infants and children. SMA has been the leading inherited cause of infant death. More specifically, SMA is caused by the absence of the SMN1 gene. In May 2019, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved onasemnogene abeparvovec, SMN1 gene replacement therapy, for all children with SMA younger than two years of age, without end-stage weakness. The objective of the study is to review the safety and efficacy of a novel gene therapy, onasemnogene abeparvovec (Zolgensma), for SMA and assess current challenges for gene therapy. For this, we have conducted a literature search on PubMed, MEDLINE, and Ovid (2019 to 2022) in the English language using the terms SMA, onasemnogene, and gene therapy. The search included articles, websites, and published papers from reputable health organizations, hospitals, and global organizations dedicated to bringing awareness to Spinal Muscular Atrophy. We found the first gene therapy for SMA to be onasemnogene, directly providing the survival motor neuron 1 (SMN1) gene to produce the survival motor neuron (SMN) protein. Onasemnogene is approved by the Food and Drug Administration and has the added benefit of being a one-time dose. On the downside, a major side effect of this treatment is hepatotoxicity. There is substantial evidence that the efficacy of therapy is increased when administered early to children under three months of age. Therefore, we concluded that onasemnogene appears to be an efficacious therapy for younger pediatric patients with SMA type 1. Drug cost and potential hepatotoxicity are major concerns. Long-term benefits and risks have not been determined, but it is more cost-effective and requires less time of treatment compared to the other used drug, nusinersen. Therefore, the combined safety, cost, and effectiveness of onasemnogene abeparvovec make it a reliable treatment option for treating SMA Type 1.

Structural and functional characterization of capsid binding by anti-AAV9 monoclonal antibodies from infants after SMA gene therapy.

Success in the treatment of infants with spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) underscores the potential of vectors based on adeno-associated virus (AAV). However, a major obstacle to the full realization of this potential is pre-existing natural and therapy-induced anti-capsid humoral immunity. Structure-guided capsid engineering is one possible approach to surmounting this challenge but necessitates an understanding of capsid-antibody interactions at high molecular resolution. Currently, only mouse-derived monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) are available to structurally map these interactions, which presupposes that mouse and human-derived antibodies are functionally equivalent. In this study, we have characterized the polyclonal antibody responses of infants following AAV9-mediated gene therapy for SMA and recovered 35 anti-capsid mAbs from the abundance of switched-memory B (smB) cells present in these infants. For 21 of these mAbs, seven from each of three infants, we have undertaken functional and structural analysis measuring neutralization, affinities, and binding patterns by cryoelectron microscopy (cryo-EM). Four distinct patterns were observed akin to those reported for mouse-derived mAbs, but with early evidence of differing binding pattern preference and underlying molecular interactions. This is the first human and largest series of anti-capsid mAbs to have been comprehensively characterized and will prove to be powerful tools for basic discovery and applied purposes.

Treatment of spinal muscular atrophy with Onasemnogene Abeparvovec in Switzerland: a prospective observational case series study.

BACKGROUND: Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is a rare neuromuscular disorder leading to early death in the majority of affected individuals without treatment. Recently, targeted treatment approaches including Onasemnogene Abeparvovec (OA) were introduced. This study describes the first real-world experience with OA in Switzerland. METHODS: Prospective observational case series study using data collected within the Swiss Registry for Neuromuscular Disorders from SMA patients treated with OA. Development of motor, bulbar and respiratory function, appearance of scoliosis, and safety data (platelet count, liver function, and cardiotoxicity) were analyzed. RESULTS: Nine individuals were treated with OA and followed for 383 ± 126 days: six SMA type 1 (of which two with nusinersen pretreatment), one SMA type 2, and two pre-symptomatic individuals. In SMA type 1, CHOP Intend score increased by 28.1 from a mean score of 20.5 ± 7.6 at baseline. At end of follow-up, 50% of SMA type 1 patients required nutritional support and 17% night-time ventilation; 67% developed scoliosis. The SMA type 2 patient and two pre-symptomatically treated individuals reached maximum CHOP Intend scores. No patient required adaptation of the concomitant prednisolone treatment, although transient decrease of platelet count and increase of transaminases were observed in all patients. Troponin-T was elevated prior to OA treatment in 100% and showed fluctuations in 57% thereafter. CONCLUSIONS: OA is a potent treatment for SMA leading to significant motor function improvements. However, the need for respiratory and especially nutritional support as well as the development of scoliosis must be thoroughly evaluated in SMA type 1 patients even in the short term after OA treatment.

Towards sustainability and affordability of expensive cell and gene therapies? Applying a cost-based pricing model to estimate prices for Libmeldy and Zolgensma.

BACKGROUND AIMS: Drug prices are regarded as one of the most influential factors in determining accessibility and affordability to novel therapies. Cell and gene therapies such as OTL-200 (brand name: Libmeldy) and AVXS-101 (brand name: Zolgensma) with (expected) list prices of 3.0 million EUR and 1.9 million EUR per treatment, respectively, spark a global debate on the affordability of such therapies. The aim of this study was to use a recently published cost-based pricing model to calculate prices for cell and gene therapies, with OTL-200 and AVXS-101 as case study examples. METHODS: Using the pricing model proposed by Uyl-de Groot and Löwenberg, we estimated a price for both therapies. We searched the literature and online public sources to estimate (i) research and development (R&D) expenses adjusted for risk of failure and cost of capital, (ii) the eligible patient population and (iii) costs of drug manufacturing to calculate a base-case price for OTL-200 and AVXS-101. All model input parameters were varied in a stepwise, deterministic sensitivity analysis and scenario analyses to assess their impact on the calculated prices. RESULTS: Prices for OTL-200 and AVXS-101 were estimated at 1 048 138 EUR and 380 444 EUR per treatment, respectively. In deterministic sensitivity analyses, varying R&D estimates had the greatest impact on the price for OTL-200, whereas for AVXS-101, changes in the profit margin changed the calculated price substantially. Highest prices in scenario analyses were achieved when assuming the lowest number of patients for OTL-200 and highest R&D expenses for AVXS-101. The lowest R&D expenses scenario resulted in lowest prices for either therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Our results show that, using the proposed model, prices for both OTL-200 and AVXS-101 lie substantially below the currently (proposed) list prices for both therapies. Nevertheless, the uncertainty of the used model input parameters is considerable, which translates in a wide range of estimated prices. This is mainly because of a lack of transparency from pharmaceutical companies regarding R&D expenses and the costs of drug manufacturing. Simultaneously, the disease indications for both therapies remain heavily understudied in terms of their epidemiological profile. Despite the considerable variation in the estimated prices, our results may support the public debate on value-based and cost-based pricing models, and on "fair" drug prices in general.

Prevalence of Anti-Adeno-Associated Virus Serotype 9 Antibodies in Adult Patients with Spinal Muscular Atrophy.

5q-associated spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is an autosomal recessive neuromuscular disorder that leads to progressive muscle atrophy and weakness. The disease is caused by a homozygous deletion or mutation in the survival of motor neuron 1 (SMN1) gene, resulting in insufficient levels of SMN protein. Onasemnogene abeparvovec-xioi (OA) is a nonreplicating vector based on adeno-associated virus serotype 9 (AAV9) that contains the full-length human SMN1 gene. Recently, OA was approved for the treatment of SMA by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and the European Medicines Agency. Because the presence of neutralizing antibodies caused by previous natural exposure to wild-type adeno-associated viruses (AAVs) may impair the efficiency of AAV-mediated gene transfer and thus reduce the therapeutic benefit of the gene therapy, an AAV9-binding antibody titer of >1:50 was defined as a surrogate exclusion criterion in pivotal OA clinical trials. However, these studies were exclusively conducted in infants and children. Because data on anti-AAV9 antibody titers in adults are generally sparse and not available for adult patients with SMA, we determined the prevalence of anti-AAV9 antibodies in sera of adult individuals with SMA to evaluate the feasibility of AAV9-mediated gene therapy in this cohort. In our study population of 69 adult patients with SMA type 2 and type 3 from four German academic sites, only 3 patients (4.3%) had an elevated anti-AAV9 antibody titer of >1:50. The prevalence of anti-AAV9 antibodies did not increase with age. The low and age-independent prevalence of anti-AAV9 antibodies in our cohort provides evidence that gene therapy with intravenous administered recombinant AAV9 vectors (rAAV9) might be feasible in adult patients with SMA, regardless of the patients' sex, SMA type, walking ability, or ventilatory status. This could also apply to the treatment of other inherited neurological diseases with rAAV9.

Mid- and long-term (at least 12 months) follow-up of patients with spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) treated with nusinersen, onasemnogene abeparvovec, risdiplam or combination therapies: A systematic review of real-world study data.

OBJECTIVES: This systematic review aimed to assess mid- and long-term (at least 12 months) real-world study data from all types of spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) patients treated with any of the approved drugs or combination therapies. METHODS: A systematic literature search was carried out in five databases. Two authors selected the studies based on pre-defined selection criteria and independently graded the risk of bias at study level. RESULTS: Five hundred forty-six records were identified in the literature search and 22 studies (in 26 publications) were included in the analysis. Nusinersen, onasemnogene abeparvovec and combination therapies improved motor endpoints in SMA type 1 patients. SMA type 2 to type 4 patients treated with nusinersen showed stabilisation or small improvements in motor endpoints with some deterioration observed. Quality of life endpoints, such as respiratory and nutritional support were poorly reported on. Drug-related adverse events occurred rarely in all types of SMA patients with all assessed drugs. Mid- and long-term studies on risdiplam could not be identified. CONCLUSIONS: The large quantity of missing data and heterogeneity of studies hinder comparability. Although stability and further improvement on the long-term is still uncertain, the results from the included evidence, as well as from pivotal trials show a striking contrast to the natural progression of the disease.

Crowd Funding for Orphan Drugs: The Case of Baby Pia.

Medical crowdfunding is a relatively new strategy to obtain access to orphan drugs. The case of Baby Pia, a Belgian girl with SMA type 1 for whom in 2018 more than $ 2.1 million was raised to get her treated with Zolgensma®, illustrates well the potential power of medical crowdfunding. But apart from the success in raising money, the case is also of particular importance for the ethical issues it brings to the surface as related to justice, equity, power imbalances, responsibility, accountability, indebtedness and privacy.

Early Cost-Effectiveness of Onasemnogene Abeparvovec-xioi (Zolgensma) and Nusinersen (Spinraza) Treatment for Spinal Muscular Atrophy I in The Netherlands With Relapse Scenarios.

OBJECTIVES: Onasemnogene Abeparvovec-xioi (AVXS-101) is a gene therapy intended for curative treatment of spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) with an expected price of around €2 000 000. The goal of this study is to perform a cost-effectiveness analysis of treatment of SMA I patients with AVXS-101 in The Netherlands including relapse scenarios. METHODS: An individual-based state-transition model was used to model treatment effect and survival of SMA I patients treated with AVXS-101, nusinersen and best supportive care (BSC). The model included five health states: three health states according to SMA types, one for permanent ventilation and one for death. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed. Effects of relapsing to lower health states in the years following treatment was explored. RESULTS: The base-case incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) for AVXS-101 versus BSC is €138 875/QALY, and €53 447/QALY for AVXS-101 versus nusinersen. If patients relapse within 10 years after treatment with AVXS-101, the ICER can increase up to 6-fold, with effects diminishing thereafter. Only relapses occurring later than 50 years after treatment have a negligible effect on the ICER. To comply with Dutch willingness-to-pay reference values, the price of AVXS-101 must decrease to €680 000. CONCLUSIONS: Based on this model, treatment with AVXS-101 is unlikely to be cost-effective under Dutch willingness-to-pay reference values. Uncertainty regarding the long-term curative properties of AVXS-101 can result in multiplication of the ICER. Decision-makers are advised to appropriately balance these uncertainties against the price they are willing to pay now.

New Therapeutics Options for Pediatric Neuromuscular Disorders.

Neuromuscular disorders (NMDs) of Childhood onset are a genetically heterogeneous group of diseases affecting the anterior horn cell, the peripheral nerve, the neuromuscular junction, or the muscle. For many decades, treatment of NMDs has been exclusively symptomatic. But this has changed fundamentally in recent years due to the development of new drugs attempting either to ameliorate secondary pathophysiologic consequences or to modify the underlying genetic defect itself. While the effects on the course of disease are still modest in some NMDs (e.g., Duchenne muscular dystrophy), new therapies have substantially prolonged life expectancy and improved motor function in others (e.g., spinal muscular atrophy and infantile onset Pompe disease). This review summarizes recently approved medicaments and provides an outlook for new therapies that are on the horizon in this field.

The First Orally Deliverable Small Molecule for the Treatment of Spinal Muscular Atrophy.

Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is 1 of the leading causes of infant mortality. SMA is mostly caused by low levels of Survival Motor Neuron (SMN) protein due to deletion of or mutation in the SMN1 gene. Its nearly identical copy, SMN2, fails to compensate for the loss of SMN1 due to predominant skipping of exon 7. Correction of SMN2 exon 7 splicing by an antisense oligonucleotide (ASO), nusinersen (Spinraza™), that targets the intronic splicing silencer N1 (ISS-N1) became the first approved therapy for SMA. Restoration of SMN levels using gene therapy was the next. Very recently, an orally deliverable small molecule, risdiplam (Evrysdi™), became the third approved therapy for SMA. Here we discuss how these therapies are positioned to meet the needs of the broad phenotypic spectrum of SMA patients.

European ad-hoc consensus statement on gene replacement therapy for spinal muscular atrophy.

Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) used to be one of the most common genetic causes of infant mortality. New disease modifying treatments have changed the disease trajectories and most impressive results are seen if treatment is initiated in the presymptomatic phase of the disease. Very recently, the European Medicine Agency approved Onasemnogene abeparvovec (Zolgensma®) for the treatment of patients with SMA with up to three copies of the SMN2 gene or the clinical presentation of SMA type 1. While this broad indication provides new opportunities, it also triggers discussions on the appropriate selection of patients in the context of limited available evidence. To aid the rational use of Onasemnogene abeparvovec for the treatment of SMA, a group of European neuromuscular experts presents in this paper eleven consensus statements covering qualification, patient selection, safety considerations and long-term monitoring.