ABSTRACT
Apixaban is an oral anticoagulant that directly inhibits the target Factor Xa (FXa). In this study, we focused on the in vivo and in vitro effects of adagrasib and asciminib on apixaban metabolism, to discover potential drug-drug interactions (DDI) and explore their inhibitory mechanisms. The levels of apixaban and its metabolite, O-desmethyl-apixaban (M2), were determined by ultra performance liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS). In vitro evaluation, the maximum half inhibitory concentration (IC50) of adagrasib in rat liver microsomes (RLM) and human liver microsomes (HLM) against apixaban was 7.99 µM and 117.40 µM, respectively. The IC50 value of asciminib against apixaban in RLM and HLM was 4.28 µM and 18.42 µM, respectively. The results of the analysis on inhibition mechanisms showed that adagrasib inhibited the metabolism of apixaban through a non-competitive mechanism, while asciminib inhibited the metabolism of apixaban through a mixed mechanism. Moreover, the interaction of apixaban with adagrasib and asciminib in Sprague-Dawley (SD) rats was also investigated. It was found that the pharmacokinetic characteristics of apixaban were significantly changed when combined with these two antitumor drugs, where AUC(0-t), AUC(0-∞), t1/2, Tmax, and Cmax were increased, while CLz/F was significantly decreased. But both drugs did not appear to affect the metabolism of M2 in a significant way. Consistent results from in vitro and in vivo demonstrated that both adagrasib and asciminib inhibited the metabolism of apixaban. It provided reference data for the future clinical individualization of apixaban.
Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents , Microsomes, Liver , Pyrazoles , Pyridones , Rats, Sprague-Dawley , Animals , Pyrazoles/pharmacology , Pyrazoles/metabolism , Pyridones/pharmacology , Pyridones/pharmacokinetics , Humans , Microsomes, Liver/metabolism , Rats , Male , Antineoplastic Agents/pharmacology , Drug Interactions , Tandem Mass Spectrometry , Factor Xa Inhibitors/pharmacology , Factor Xa Inhibitors/pharmacokinetics , Phenylacetates , ThiophenesABSTRACT
Evidence indicates that combinations of anti-EGFR antibodies and KRAS p.G12C (c.34G>T) inhibitors can be an effective treatment strategy for advanced colorectal cancer. We hypothesized that KRAS c.34G>T (p.G12C)-mutated colorectal carcinoma might be a distinct tumor subtype. We utilized a prospective cohort incident tumor biobank (including 1347 colorectal carcinomas) and detected KRAS c.34G>T (p.G12C) mutation in 43 cases (3.2%) and other KRAS mutations (in codon 12, 13, 61, or 146) in 467 cases (35%). The CpG island methylator phenotype (CIMP)-low prevalence was similarly higher in KRAS c.34G>T mutants (52%) and other KRAS mutants (49%) than in KRAS-wild-type tumors (31%). KRAS c.34G>T mutants showed higher CIMP-high prevalence (14%) and lower CIMP-negative prevalence (33%) compared with other KRAS mutants (6% and 45%, respectively; p = 0.0036). Similar to other KRAS mutants, KRAS c.34G>T-mutated tumors were associated with cecal location, non-microsatellite instability (MSI)-high status, BRAF wild type, and PIK3CA mutation when compared with KRAS-wild-type tumors. Compared with BRAF-mutated tumors, KRAS c.34G>T mutants showed more frequent LINE-1 hypomethylation, a biomarker for early-onset colorectal carcinoma. KRAS c.34G>T mutants were not associated with other features, including the tumor tissue abundance of Fusobacterium nucleatum (F. animalis), pks+ Escherichia coli, Bifidobacterium, or (enterotoxigenic) Bacteroides fragilis. Among 1122 BRAF-wild-type colorectal carcinomas, compared with KRAS-wild-type tumors, multivariable-adjusted colorectal cancer-specific mortality hazard ratios (95% confidence interval) were 1.82 (1.05-3.17) in KRAS c.34G>T (p.G12C)-mutated tumors (p = 0.035) and 1.57 (1.22-2.02) in other KRAS-mutated tumors (p = 0.0004). Our study provides novel evidence for clinical and tumor characteristics of KRAS c.34G>T (p.G12C)-mutated colorectal carcinoma.
ABSTRACT
Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is a significant subtype of lung cancer, and poses a dangerous global threat. One of the current approaches of NSCLC treatment is a combination therapy of adagrasib and pembrolizumab. Accurate monitoring of these drug concentrations in biological fluids is critical for treatment efficacy. Since no method was reported for simultaneous estimation of these drugs, this study focuses on the development of a validated LC-MS/MS bioanalytical method for simultaneous quantification of Adagrasib and Pembrolizumab in rat plasma. The analytes were extracted from the biological matrix through liquid-liquid extraction techniques using acetonitrile as extraction solvent. The analytes were separated on a Waters X-bridge phenyl C18 column, with a mixture of acetonitrile: 0.1 % TFA in water (50: 50 v/v) as mobile phase at an isocratic flow rate of 1.0 mL/min with a runtime of about 5 min. Adagrasib (m/z 605.12 â 201.62), Pembrolizumab (m/z 146.32 â 85.15), and Sotorasib (m/z 561.59 â 218.92) were determined by recording the mass spectra through multiple reaction monitoring in positive mode. The method was validated according to USFDA guidelines. The results demonstrate satisfactory linearity with an r2 value of 0.9998 in the ranges of 40-800 and 10-200 ng/mL, accuracy with mean percentage recovery of 95.22-98.59 % and 96.98-98.57 %, precision indicated with %RSD ranged between 0.39-1.91 % and 0.85-9.03 % for Adagrasib and Pembrolizumab respectively, and other key parameters. The developed method can determine the pharmacokinetic parameters to indicate the efficacy and safety of the drugs, and also can quantify selected drugs simultaneously in biological samples.
Subject(s)
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized , Liquid Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry , Animals , Male , Rats , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/pharmacokinetics , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/blood , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/chemistry , Limit of Detection , Linear Models , Liquid-Liquid Extraction , Reproducibility of Results , Tandem Mass SpectrometryABSTRACT
Surface plasmon resonance (SPR) is an optical effect at an electron-rich surface that enables affinity measurements of biomolecules in real time. It is label free and versatile, not limited to proteins, nucleic acids, and small molecules. SPR is a widely accepted method to measure not only affinity of molecular interactions but also association and dissociation rates of such interactions. In this chapter, we describe a general method to measure the affinity of a small molecule drug, MRTX849, to GDP bound HRAS, KRAS, and NRAS.
Subject(s)
Acetonitriles , Proto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras) , Pyrimidines , Surface Plasmon Resonance , Surface Plasmon Resonance/methods , Proto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)/genetics , Piperazines , Protein Isoforms , MutationABSTRACT
MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry enables high-throughput screening of covalent fragment libraries and SAR compound progressions of selective KRAS G12C inhibitors. Using the MALDI-TOF platform instead of the more traditional ESI-MS TOF/orbitrap instrumentation can radically shorten sample acquisition time, allowing up to 384 samples to be screened in 30 min. The typical throughput for a covalent library screen is 1152 samples per 8 h, including processing, calculation, and reporting steps. The throughput can be doubled without any significant assay modification.
Subject(s)
High-Throughput Screening Assays , Proto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras) , Spectrometry, Mass, Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption-Ionization/methods , Proto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)/genetics , High-Throughput Screening Assays/methods , MutationABSTRACT
Kirsten rat sarcoma virus (KRAS) is the most frequently found oncogene in human cancers, including non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). For many years, KRAS was considered "undruggable" due to its structure and difficult targeting. However, the discovery of the switch II region in the KRAS-G12C-mutated protein has changed the therapeutic landscape with the design and development of novel direct KRAS-G12C inhibitors. Sotorasib and adagrasib are FDA-approved targeted agents for pre-treated patients with KRAS-G12C-mutated NSCLC. Despite promising results, the efficacy of these novel inhibitors is limited by mechanisms of resistance. Ongoing studies are evaluating combination strategies for overcoming resistance. In this review, we summarize the biology of the KRAS protein and the characteristics of KRAS mutations. We then present current and emerging therapeutic approaches for targeting KRAS mutation subtypes intending to provide individualized treatment for lung cancer harboring this challenging driver mutation.
ABSTRACT
Both sotorasib and adagrasib are approved for use in metastatic KRASG12C-mutated NSCLC after cancer progression on chemotherapy and immunotherapy. Hepatoxicity is a commonly encountered adverse effect of both agents, and little data exists about the safety of sequential use of these agents when hepatotoxicity is encountered. In this case report, we describe a patient who developed recurrent hepatotoxicity with sotorasib and was able to switch to adagrasib without hepatotoxicity and subsequently experienced a prolonged cancer response. We also describe a previously unreported adagrasib adverse effect of photoinduced skin hyperpigmentation.
ABSTRACT
Kirsten rat sarcoma virus protein (KRAS) is a protein that plays a central role in signal transduction using extracellular signal regulated kinase (ERK) and mitogen activated protein kinase (MAPK) cellular signaling pathway. KRAS is a frequently mutated oncogene and plays a pivotal role in tumor initiation and progression. Hotspot mutations on codon 12, 13 and 61 in KRAS are well-known for their role in drug resistance and non-hotspot mutations also play a significant part in contributing to resistance mechanisms. The understanding of how these non-hotspot mutations might affect the signal transduction of KRAS and their contribution towards drug resistance is understudied. Here we provide structural insights into the interaction of non-hotspot KRAS mutants with GTP (the native ligand) using a molecular docking and molecular dynamics simulation approach. Extensive molecular docking and simulation studies suggest that non-hotspot mutations (E31D and E63K) show stable interaction with native ligand using all five trajectories, as evidenced by root mean square of distance (RMSD), root mean square of fluctuation (RMSF), radius of gyration (RoG), coulomb short-range energy and MMGBSA analysis. These results suggest that non-hotspot mutations do not undermine the oncogenic nature of KRAS. This observation is consistent with previous findings where overexpressing E31D and E63K mutations share phenotypic features with G12D and G13D transfected cells, including increased proliferative capacity, actin cytoskeleton organization, and migration rates. We further test whether FDA-approved KRAS inhibitors sotorasib and adagrasib successfully inhibit the E31D and E63K mutants. Results suggest that these two non-hotspot mutants can be inhibited by both drugs with following trend of structural stability (E31D > E63K > wild-KRAS > Q61H > G12C). Based on sharp coherence in trajectories between wild KRAS and non-hotspot mutants, it is suggested that these novel mutants do not contribute to drug resistance mechanism. Overall, we provide a comprehensive understanding of the impact of non-hotspot mutations on KRAS and their potential as targets for effective cancer therapies.Communicated by Ramaswamy H. Sarma.
ABSTRACT
Purpose: Adagrasib is a selective and reversible inhibitor of KRAS G12C, which significantly delays the progression of solid tumors. However, the absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion of adagrasib in vivo are unclear. This study explores the absorption and distribution of adagrasib in vivo. Methods: An ultra-high performance liquid chromatography-tandem quadrupole mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS) method was established for the determination of adagrasib in the rat plasma and tissue. Sprague-Dawley rats were intravenous administrated (5 mg/kg) and oral administrated (30 mg/kg) with adagrasib, and the plasma concentration of adagrasib was determined. After single oral administration of adagrasib (30 mg/kg), the heart, liver, spleen, lung, kidney, intestine, and pancreas were excised. The organs were homogenized with saline solution, and the concentration of adagrasib in tissues was determined. Results: The intra- and inter-day accuracy were from 84.90% to 113.47%, and the precision was within ±15%. The matrix effect and recovery were within ±15%. The maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) of adagrasib was 677.45 ± 58.72 ng/mL. The elimination half-life time (t1/2) was 3.50 ± 0.21 h after oral administration and 2.08 ± 0.54 h after intravenous administration. The oral bioavailability was 50.72%. The highest concentrations of adagrasib in liver was 5047.80 ± 676.48 ng/g at 2 h after administration, and it was still detectable at 24 hours after administration. Conclusion: Adagrasib was slowly absorbed and cleared rapidly, and it was also widely distributed in vivo. This study provides a potential reference for adagrasib in clinical studies.
Subject(s)
Acetonitriles , Liquid Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry , Piperazines , Proto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras) , Pyrimidines , Rats , Animals , Rats, Sprague-Dawley , Biological Availability , Tissue Distribution , Chromatography, Liquid , Tandem Mass SpectrometryABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy and safety of FDA-approved KRASG12C inhibitors in patients with KRASG12C-mutated solid tumors. METHODS: We searched PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and major international conferences for clinical trials published in English up to March 6, 2023. Clinical trials investigating sotorasib or adagrasib and reporting the clinical outcomes of the objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), or incidence rate of grade ≥ 3 adverse events (AEs) were eligible. The primary endpoint was the ORR. Secondary endpoints included the DCR, incidence rate of grade ≥ 3 AEs, and odds ratio (OR) of the ORR between patients with or without co-mutation. The Random-effects model was applied for the outcomes of interest. RESULTS: 18 studies with 1224 patients were included in this meta-analysis. The pooled ORR, DCR, and incidence rate of grade ≥ 3 AEs were 31 % (95 % CI, 25-37 %), 86 % (95 % CI, 82-89 %), and 29 % (95 % CI, 23-36 %), respectively. KRASG12C-mutated NSCLC patients with a co-mutation of KEAP1 exhibited a worse ORR than those with wild-type KEAP1 (OR: 0.35, 95 % CI: 0.16-0.77). CONCLUSIONS: This study provided a comprehensive understanding of the efficacy and safety of KRASG12C inhibitors in treating solid tumors and identified KEAP1 mutation as a potential predictive biomarker of inferior response in patients treated with KRASG12C inhibitors. These findings may assist in the design of future clinical trials for identifying populations that may benefit from KRASG12C inhibitor treatment.
Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung , Lung Neoplasms , Humans , Kelch-Like ECH-Associated Protein 1 , Proto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras) , NF-E2-Related Factor 2 , MutationABSTRACT
Non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is a prevalent and often fatal malignancy. Advancements in targeted therapies have improved outcomes for NSCLC patients in the last decade. Kirsten rat sarcoma virus (KRAS) is a commonly mutated oncogene in NSCLC, contributing to tumorigenesis and proliferation. Though classically difficult to target, recently developed KRAS G12C inhibitors (sotorasib and adagrasib) have now overcome this therapeutic hurdle. We discuss the evidence for these medications, their pitfalls and adverse effects, as well as future directions in this space. Though these medications demonstrate substantial response rates in a heavily pre-treated advanced NSCLC cohort, as phase-3 evidence does not yet demonstrate an overall survival benefit versus standard-of-care chemotherapy, docetaxel. Additionally, these medications appear to have a negative interaction in combination with immunotherapies, with substantially greater hepatotoxicity rates observed. Despite this, it is undeniable that these medications represent an important advancement in targeted and personalised oncological treatment. Current and future trials assessing these medications in combination and through sequencing strategies will likely yield further clinically meaningful outcomes to guide treatment in this patient cohort.
ABSTRACT
Several studies in the last few years have determined that, in contrast to the prevailing dogma that drug resistance is simply due to Darwinian evolution-the selection of mutant clones in response to drug treatment-non-genetic changes can also lead to drug resistance whereby tolerant, reversible phenotypes are eventually relinquished by resistant, irreversible phenotypes. Here, using KRAS as a paradigm, we illustrate how this nexus between genetic and non-genetic mechanisms enables cancer cells to evade the harmful effects of drug treatment. We discuss how the conformational dynamics of the KRAS molecule, that includes intrinsically disordered regions, is influenced by the binding of the targeted therapies contributing to conformational noise and how this noise impacts the interaction of KRAS with partner proteins to rewire the protein interaction network. Thus, in response to drug treatment, reversible drug-tolerant phenotypes emerge via non-genetic mechanisms that eventually enable the emergence of irreversible resistant clones via genetic mutations. Furthermore, we also discuss the recent data demonstrating how combination therapy can help alleviate KRAS drug resistance in lung cancer, and how new treatment strategies based on evolutionary principles may help minimize or even preclude the emergence of drug resistance.
Subject(s)
Lung Neoplasms , Humans , Lung Neoplasms/drug therapy , Lung Neoplasms/genetics , Lung Neoplasms/metabolism , Proto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)/genetics , Proto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)/metabolism , Drug Resistance, Neoplasm/genetics , MutationABSTRACT
Recently, two small molecular inhibitors (SMIs) -adagrasib and sotorasib- have been introduced for targeting Kirsten rat sarcoma (KRAS) p.G12C mutations in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In order to support pharmacokinetic research as well as clinical decision making, we developed and validated a simple and accurate liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method for the multiplexed quantification of adagrasib and sotorasib. This assay was co-validated with the quantification for brigatinib, lorlatinib, pralsetinib and selpercatinib. Methanol was used for single-step protein precipitation. Chromatographic separation was performed using an Acquity® HSS C18 UPLC column, with an elution gradient of ammonium formate 0.1 % v/v in water and acetonitrile. In K2-EDTA plasma, adagrasib was found to be stable for at least seven days at room temperature and 4 °C, and at least 3 months at -80 °C. Sotorasib was found to be stable for at least three days at room temperature, seven days at 4 °C and at least 3 months at -80 °C. The method was validated over a linear range of 80-4000 ng/mL for adagrasib and 25-2500 ng/mL for sotorasib. The assay is therefore well-equipped for determining plasma concentrations in clinical practice.
Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung , Lung Neoplasms , Humans , Chromatography, Liquid/methods , Tandem Mass Spectrometry/methods , Acetonitriles , Reproducibility of Results , Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid/methodsABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of the novel KRAS-targeting agents, sotorasib and adagrasib, in treating KRAS G12C-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). DATA SOURCES: A comprehensive English-based literature search of PubMed and Clinicaltrials.gov between January 2000 and July 2023 was conducted using the terms sotorasib, Lumakras, AMG 510, adagrasib, Krazati, and MRTX849. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION: Relevant prescribing information, clinical trials, and treatment guidelines were evaluated. DATA SYNTHESIS: Sotorasib and adagrasib received accelerated US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval following pivotal phase I/II clinical trials. Sotorasib, a first-in-class KRAS inhibitor, demonstrated an overall response rate (ORR) of 41% and a progression-free survival (PFS) of 6.3 months. In a phase III confirmatory trial, sotorasib showed significantly longer PFS compared with docetaxel (5.6 vs. 4.5 months; P = 0.0017). Adagrasib produced an ORR of 42.9% and a PFS of 6.5 months. Both drugs present unique safety profiles, with common toxicities, including diarrhea, musculoskeletal pain, fatigue, and hepatotoxicity. RELEVANCE TO PATIENT CARE AND CLINICAL PRACTICE: With KRAS mutations being among the most common oncogenic alterations in NSCLC, sotorasib and adagrasib offer new therapeutic avenues for this previously "undruggable" target. Current treatment guidelines list sotorasib and adagrasib as second-line options in patients with confirmed KRAS G12C-mutated NSCLC. Additional studies are required to further differentiate the safety and efficacy profiles of these 2 agents and identify their optimal place in therapy. CONCLUSION: Sotorasib and adagrasib demonstrated promising outcomes in targeting the constitutively active KRAS G12C oncogenic driver, underscoring the need for further research to optimize their therapeutic application in this high-risk population.
ABSTRACT
KRAS is the most commonly mutated oncogene in advanced, non-squamous, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in Western countries. Of the various KRAS mutants, KRAS G12C is the most common variant (~40%), representing 10-13% of advanced non-squamous NSCLC. Recent regulatory approvals of the KRASG12C-selective inhibitors sotorasib and adagrasib for patients with advanced or metastatic NSCLC harboring KRASG12C have transformed KRAS into a druggable target. In this review, we explore the evolving role of KRAS from a prognostic to a predictive biomarker in advanced NSCLC, discussing KRAS G12C biology, real-world prevalence, clinical relevance of co-mutations, and approaches to molecular testing. Real-world evidence demonstrates significant geographic differences in KRAS G12C prevalence (8.9-19.5% in the US, 9.3-18.4% in Europe, 6.9-9.0% in Latin America, and 1.4-4.3% in Asia) in advanced NSCLC. Additionally, the body of clinical data pertaining to KRAS G12C co-mutations such as STK11, KEAP1, and TP53 is increasing. In real-world evidence, KRAS G12C-mutant NSCLC was associated with STK11, KEAP1, and TP53 co-mutations in 10.3-28.0%, 6.3-23.0%, and 17.8-50.0% of patients, respectively. Whilst sotorasib and adagrasib are currently approved for use in the second-line setting and beyond for patients with advanced/metastatic NSCLC, testing and reporting of the KRAS G12C variant should be included in routine biomarker testing prior to first-line therapy. KRAS G12C test results should be clearly documented in patients' health records for actionability at progression. Where available, next-generation sequencing is recommended to facilitate simultaneous testing of potentially actionable biomarkers in a single run to conserve tissue. Results from molecular testing should inform clinical decisions in treating patients with KRAS G12C-mutated advanced NSCLC.
Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung , Lung Neoplasms , Humans , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/epidemiology , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/genetics , Kelch-Like ECH-Associated Protein 1 , Proto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)/genetics , Prevalence , Lung Neoplasms/epidemiology , Lung Neoplasms/genetics , NF-E2-Related Factor 2 , Mutation/geneticsABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: KRAS is the most frequently mutated oncogene in cancer and encodes a key signaling protein in tumors. Due to its high affinity for GTP and the lack of a large binding pocket that allosteric inhibitors can occupy, KRAS has long been considered 'non-druggable.' Finding effective treatment measures for patients with KRAS mutations is our top priority. AREAS COVERED: In this article, we will provide an overview of the KRAS pathway and review the current state of therapeutic strategies for targeting oncogenic KRAS, as well as their potential to improve outcomes in patients with KRAS-mutant malignancies. We will also discuss the development of these strategies and gave an outlook on prospects. EXPERT OPINION: KRAS mutations have posed a significant challenge in the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) over the past few decades. However, the emergence of immunotherapy and KRAS inhibitors, such as Sotorasib (AMG 510) and Adagrasib (MRTX849), has marked a new era in cancer therapy. As more research and clinical trials continue, we anticipate the development of more effective treatment strategies and better options for lung cancer patients.
Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung , Lung Neoplasms , Humans , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/drug therapy , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/genetics , Prognosis , Proto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)/genetics , Lung Neoplasms/drug therapy , Lung Neoplasms/genetics , MutationSubject(s)
Colonic Neoplasms , Rectal Neoplasms , Humans , Proto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)/genetics , MutationABSTRACT
We developed and validated an assay utilizing a liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry technique to quantify the KRAS inhibitor adagrasib in mouse plasma and seven tissue-related matrices. The straightforward protein precipitation technique was selected to extract adagrasib and the internal standard salinomycin from the matrices. Gradient elution of acetonitrile and water modified with 0.5% (v/v) ammonium hydroxide and 0.02% (v/v) acetic acid on a C18 column at a flow rate of 0.6 ml/min was applied to separate the analytes. Both adagrasib and salinomycin were detected with a triple quadrupole mass spectrometer with positive electrospray ionization in a selected reaction monitoring mode. A linear calibration range of 2-2,000 ng/ml of adagrasib was demonstrated during the validation. In addition, the reported precision values (intra- and inter-day) were between 3.5 and 14.9%, while the accuracy values were 85.5-111.0% for all tested levels in all investigated matrices. Adagrasib in mouse plasma was reported to have good stability at room temperature, while adagrasib in tissue-related matrices was stable on ice for up to 4 h (matrix dependent). Finally, this method was successfully applied to determine the pharmacokinetic profile and tissue distribution of adagrasib in wild-type mice.
ABSTRACT
Adagrasib (Krazati™) is the second FDA-approved specific KRASG12C inhibitor for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients harboring this mutation. The impact of the drug efflux transporters ABCB1 and ABCG2, and the drug-metabolizing enzymes CYP3A and carboxylesterase 1 (CES1) on the pharmacokinetics of oral adagrasib were studied using genetically modified mouse models. Adagrasib was potently transported by human ABCB1 and modestly by mouse Abcg2 in vitro. In Abcb1a/b-/- and Abcb1a/b;Abcg2-/- mice, the brain-to-plasma ratios were enhanced by 33- and 55-fold, respectively, compared to wild-type mice, whereas ratios in Abcg2-/- mice remained unchanged. The influence of ABC transporters was completely reversed by coadministration of the dual ABCB1/ABCG2 inhibitor elacridar, increasing the brain penetration in wild-type mice by 41-fold while no signs of acute CNS toxicity were observed. Tumor ABCB1 overexpression may thus confer adagrasib resistance. Whereas the ABC transporters did not affect adagrasib plasma exposure, CYP3A and Ces1 strongly impacted its apparent oral availability. The plasma AUC0-8 h was significantly enhanced by 2.3-fold in Cyp3a-/- compared to wild-type mice, and subsequently 4.3-fold reduced in transgenic CYP3A4 mice, indicating substantial CYP3A-mediated metabolism. Adagrasib plasma exposure was strongly reduced in Ces1-/- compared to wild-type mice, but tissue exposure was slightly increased, suggesting that adagrasib binds to plasma Ces1c in mice and is perhaps metabolized by Ces1. This binding could complicate interpretation of mouse studies, especially since humans lack circulating CES1 enzyme(s). Our results may be useful to further optimize the clinical safety and efficacy of adagrasib, and give more insight into potential drug-drug interactions risks.