Prevention of new-onset atrial fibrillation in elderly patients undergoing anatomic pulmonary resection by infusion of magnesium sulfate: protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most commonly sustained arrhythmia after pulmonary resection, which has been shown to predict higher hospital morbidity and mortality. The lack of strong evidence-based medical evidence makes doctors have very few options for medications to prevent new-onset AF following thoracic surgery. Magnesium can prevent perioperative AF in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. However, this has not yet been fully studied in patients undergoing non-cardiac thoracic surgery, which is the aim of this study. This is a single-center, prospective, double-blind, randomized controlled trial. In total, 838 eligible patients were randomly assigned to one of two study groups, namely, the control group or the magnesium group. The patients in the magnesium group preoperatively received 80 mg magnesium sulfate/kg ideal weight in 100 ml normal saline 30 min. The control group received the same volumes of normal saline simultaneously. The primary outcome is the incidence of new-onset AF intra-operative and on the first, second, and third postoperative days. The secondary outcomes are bradycardia, hypertension, hypotension, and flushing. The occurrence of stroke or any other type of arrhythmia is also recorded. Postoperative respiratory suppression and gastrointestinal discomfort, intensive care unit stays and total duration of hospital stays, in-hospital mortality, and 3-month all-cause mortality are also recorded as important outcomes. This study aims to prospectively evaluate the prophylactic effects of magnesium sulfate against AF compared with a placebo control group during and following anatomic pulmonary resection. The results may provide reliable evidence for the prophylactic value of magnesium against AF in patients with lung cancer. The trial was approved by the Clinical Research Ethics Committee of Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital and has been registered at Chinese Clinical Trial Registry: www.chictr.org.cn, identifier: ChiCTR2300068046.

Early chest tube removal regardless of drainage volume after anatomic pulmonary resection: A multicenter, randomized, controlled trial.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to evaluate the safety and feasibility of early chest tube removal after anatomic pulmonary resection, regardless of the drainage volume. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter, randomized, controlled, noninferiority trial. Patients with greater than 300 mL drainage volume during postoperative day 1 were randomly assigned to group A (tube removed on postoperative day 2) and group B (tube retained until drainage volume ≤300 mL/24 hours). The primary end point was the frequency of respiratory-related adverse events (grade 2 or higher based on the Clavien-Dindo classification) within 30 days postoperatively. RESULTS: Between April 2019 and October 2021, 175 patients were assigned to group A (N = 88) or group B (N = 87). One patient in group B who experienced chylothorax was excluded from the study. Respiratory-related adverse events were observed in 10 patients (11.4%) in group A and 12 patients (14.0%) in group B (P = .008). The frequencies of thoracentesis or chest tube reinsertion were not significantly different (8.0% and 9.3% in groups A and B, respectively, P = .752). Additionally, the duration of chest tube placement was significantly shorter in group A than in group B (median, 2 vs 3 days; P < .001). No significant difference between groups A and B was found in postoperative hospital stay (median, 6 vs 7 days, P = .231). CONCLUSIONS: Early chest tube removal, regardless of drainage volume, was safe and feasible in patients who underwent anatomic pulmonary resection.

Postoperative day 1 discharge following robotic thoracoscopic pulmonary anatomic resections in the era of enhanced recovery protocol: A single-institution experience.

Objective: Implementation and continuing optimization of enhanced recovery protocol after thoracic surgery results in significant improvement of postoperative outcomes. We observed a 10-fold increase in the rate of postoperative day (POD) 1 discharges following robotic thoracoscopic anatomic resections over time. We aimed to determine factors associated with safe POD1 discharges. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database of robotic anatomic pulmonary resections between July 1, 2012, and June 30, 2022, with patients of the last 2.5 years forming the basis of this study. Data collected included demographics, insurance types, Area Deprivation Index (indicator of poverty), and operative and postoperative variables including length of stay, opioid use, daily pain levels, readmissions, and outpatient interventions. Factors associated with POD1 were analyzed using a logistic regression module. Result: In total, 279 patients met inclusion criteria (91 POD1 discharges, 32.6%; none discharged with a pleural catheter). There was neither an increase of postdischarge interventions for pleural complications nor readmission in early discharge patients. After adjusting for relevant factors, younger age, right middle lobectomy, lower opioid use on POD1, operating room finish before 4 PM, and low Area Deprivation Index were significantly associated with POD1 discharge. A subanalysis of 49 patients, who could have been discharged on POD1, identified hypoxemia requiring home oxygen, atrial fibrillation, and poorly controlled pain being common mitigatable clinical factors delaying POD1 discharge. Conclusions: Safe POD1 discharge following robotic thoracoscopic anatomic resection was achieved in 32% of cases. Identification of positive and negative factors affecting early discharge provides guidance for further modifications to increase the number of POD1 discharges.

Meta-analysis of Lobectomy and Sublobar Resection for Stage I Non-small Cell Lung Cancer With Spread Through Air Spaces.

Surgery is the preferred treatment for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Numerous studies have shown that spread through air spaces (STAS) can predict the survival of patients with stage I NSCLC. However, for stage I NSCLC, it is not known whether sublobar resection or lobectomy should be performed if STAS is present. In the present study, we compared the survival outcomes of patients with STAS who underwent lobectomy versus those who underwent sublobar resection. A search was performed on the PubMed, Cochrane Library and EMBASE on March 6, 2021 to identify relevant studies. Predetermined criteria were utilized to screen studies. A meta-analysis was performed using hazard ratio (HR). In total, 13 studies involving 5947 patients were included in the meta-analysis. It was found that STAS was significantly correlated with worse RFS (HR = 2.58, 95% CI: 2.16-3.07) and OS (HR = 2.41, 95% CI: 1.97-2.95) in patients with stage I NSCLC. Lobectomy resulted in a longer RFS (HR = 2.59, 95% CI: 1.99-3.37) and OS (HR = 2.78, 95% CI: 1.92-4.02) than sublobar resection in stage I NSCLC patients with STAS. STAS is an independent prognostic factor in NSCLC. Lobectomy may be more effective for stage I NSCLC patients who underwent sublobar resection previously if STAS is present.

Outcomes of major complications after robotic anatomic pulmonary resection.

BACKGROUND: There is a paucity of robust clinical data on major postoperative complications following robotic-assisted resection for primary lung cancer. This study assessed the incidence and outcomes of patients who experienced major complications after robotic anatomic pulmonary resection. METHODS: This was a multicenter, retrospective review of patients who underwent robotic anatomic pulmonary resection between 2002 and 2018. Major complications were defined as grade III or higher complications according to the Clavien-Dindo classification. Statistical analysis was performed based on patient-, surgeon-, and treatment-related factors. RESULTS: During the study period, 1264 patients underwent robotic anatomic pulmonary resections, and 64 major complications occurred in 54 patients (4.3%). Univariate analysis identified male sex, forced expiratory volume in 1 second, diffusion capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide, neoadjuvant therapy, and extent of resection as associated with increased likelihood of a major postoperative complication. Patient age, performance status, body mass index, reoperation status, and surgeon experience did not have a significant impact on major complications. Patients who experienced at least 1 major complication were at higher risk for an intensive care unit stay of >24 hours (17.0% vs 1.4%; P < .001) and prolonged hospitalization (8.5 days vs 4 days; P < .001). Patients who experienced a major postoperative complication had a 14.8% risk of postoperative death. CONCLUSIONS: In this series, the major complication rate during the postoperative period was 4.3%. A number of identified patient- and treatment-related factors were associated with an increased risk of major complications. Major complications had a significant impact on mortality and duration of stay.