Oral Janus Kinase Inhibitors in Pediatric Atopic Dermatitis.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To analyze the efficacy and safety of Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi) in the treatment of pediatric AD. RECENT FINDINGS: Adolescents with moderate and severe atopic dermatitis (AD) need systemic therapies, as stated several recent practice guidelines. (JAKi) have shown their efficacy in the treatment of adult AD, however, there is a lack of information concerning efficacy and safety of their use in pediatric AD. We found that the JAKi's abrocitinib (ABRO), baricitinib (BARI), and upadacitinib (UPA), are all an effective treatment option with a very fast onset of action for adolescents with moderate-to-severe AD. BARI was not effective in children between 2 and 10 years with moderate-to-severe AD. Fortunately, major safety issues with JAKi in adolescents with AD have not been documented in the trials, so far, contrasting with the reports in adults with AD, where these events have very rarely occurred. There are some reports of herpes zoster (HZ) infection in adolescents on JAKi, but it is not a major safety concern. Acne is a relatively common AE with UPA in adolescents; however, it is responsive to standard treatment. This review will help the clinician to choose among the JAKi according to the needs and clinical features of patients with moderate and severe AD. In the following years, with the advent of new biologicals and JAKi, these therapies will fall into place in each phase of the evolution of patients with AD.

Current evidence for janus kinase inhibitors in adult and juvenile dermatomyositis and key comparisons.

INTRODUCTION: Adult dermatomyositis (DM) and juvenile dermatomyositis (JDM) are rare autoimmune diseases with characteristic skin rashes, weakness, and other systemic features. Upregulated interferon signaling has been consistently described in both adult and juvenile DM which makes janus kinase inhibitors (jakinibs) an attractive therapeutic agent that has a targeted mechanism of action. AREAS COVERED: Herein is a review of the growing literature of jakinib use in adult and juvenile DM, including reports on specific disease features and safety of jakinibs in this population and a comparison between adult and juvenile DM. We performed a literature review using PubMed including all English-language publications before 1 February 2024 and abstracts from key recent rheumatology conferences. EXPERT OPINION: Jakinibs are an exciting and promising treatment in both adult and juvenile DM. Current Phase 2 and 3 randomized placebo-controlled trials of jakinibs in both adult and JDM will provide significant insights into the efficacy of this class of medication as a potentially more mechanistically targeted treatment of both skin and muscle disease. In fact, these results will likely inform the treatment paradigm of dermatomyositis in that it may even be considered as first or second line. The next five years in the therapeutic landscape of both juvenile and adult DM is an exciting time for both patients and medical providers.

Safety of baricitinib in Japanese patients with rheumatoid arthritis in clinical use: 3-year data of all-case post-marketing surveillance study.

OBJECTIVE: To assess safety of baricitinib in Japanese patients with rheumatoid arthritis in real-world clinical practice. METHODS: This all-case post-marketing surveillance study included patients initiating baricitinib for rheumatoid arthritis from September 2017 to April 2019. Treatment duration was recorded. Safety data were collected for up to 3 years from baricitinib initiation (up to 4 weeks post discontinuation in discontinuing patients). RESULTS: Safety analyses included 4720 patients; 2580 (54.7%) were ≥65 years old. Baricitinib persistence rate was 45.4% (3 year Kaplan-Meier analysis); the most common discontinuation reason was insufficient effectiveness (n = 1005, 21.3%). Serious adverse events occurred in 600 patients (incidence rate 10.42/100 patient-years; 95% confidence interval, 9.76-11.09). There were 39 deaths (incidence rate 0.43 [0.30-0.57]/100 patient-years). Incidence rate per 100 patient-years for adverse events of special interest were herpes zoster 4.68 (4.22-5.14), serious infection 3.05 (2.68-3.41), malignancy 1.09 (0.87-1.30), major adverse cardiovascular events 0.35 (0.23-0.48) and venous thromboembolism 0.25 (0.15-0.36). Incidence rates did not increase with prolonged exposure. CONCLUSIONS: No new safety concerns were identified during this 3 year post-marketing surveillance study of baricitinib in Japanese patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Patients and clinicians should be cognizant of herpes zoster and other serious infection risks during baricitinib treatment, especially in the first 6 months.

JAK2 inhibitor protects the septic heart through enhancing mitophagy in cardiomyocytes.

Sepsis-induced myocardial dysfunction (SIMD) is a severe complication in sepsis, manifested as myocardial systolic dysfunction, which is associated with poor prognosis and higher mortality. Mitophagy, a self-protective mechanism maintaining cellular homeostasis, plays an indispensable role in cardioprotection. This study aimed to unveil the cardioprotective effects of Baricitinib on LPS-induced myocardial dysfunction and its effect on mitophagy. Herein, we demonstrated that LPS induced severe myocardial dysfunction and initiated mitophagy in septic mice hearts. Despite the initiation of mitophagy, a significant number of apoptotic cells and damaged mitochondria persisted in the myocardium, and myocardial energy metabolism remained impaired, indicating that the limited mitophagy was insufficient to mitigate LPS-induced damage. The JAK2-AKT-mTOR signaling pathway is activated in LPS-induced cardiomyocytes and in the hearts of septic mice. Baricitinib administration remarkably improved cardiac function, suppressed systemic inflammatory response, attenuated histopathological changes, inhibited cardiac cell apoptosis and alleviated myocardial damage in septic mice. Furthermore, Baricitinib treatment significantly enhanced PINK1-Parkin-mediated mitophagy, increased autophagosomes, decreased impaired mitochondria, and restored myocardial energy metabolism. Mechanically, the limited mitophagy in septic myocardium was associated with increased p-ULK1 (Ser757), which was regulated by p-mTOR. Baricitinib reduced p-ULK1 (Ser757) and enhanced mitophagy by inhibiting the JAK2-AKT-mTOR signaling pathway. Inhibition of mitophagy with Mdivi-1 reversed the cardiac protective and anti-inflammatory effects of Baricitinib in septic mice. These findings suggest that Baricitinib attenuates SIMD by enhancing mitophagy in cardiomyocytes via the JAK2-AKT-mTOR signaling pathway, providing a novel mechanistic and therapeutic insight into the SIMD.

Baricitinib alleviates cardiac fibrosis and inflammation induced by chronic sympathetic activation.

Cardiac fibrosis is characterized by the over-proliferation, over-transdifferentiation and over-deposition of extracellular matrix (ECM) of cardiac fibroblasts (CFs). Cardiac sympathetic activation is one of the leading causes of myocardial fibrosis. Meanwhile, cardiac fibrosis is often together with cardiac inflammation, which accelerates fibrosis by mediating inflammatory cytokines secretion. Recently, the Janus kinase/signal transducer and activator of transcription (JAK/STAT3) signaling pathway has been confirmed by its vital role during the progression of cardiac fibrosis. Thus, JAK/STAT3 signaling pathway is thought to be a potential therapeutic target for cardiac fibrosis. Baricitinib (BR), a novel JAK1/2 inhibitor, has been reported excellent effects of anti-fibrosis in multiple fibrotic diseases. However, little is known about whether and how BR ameliorates cardiac fibrosis caused by chronic sympathetic activation. Isoproterenol (ISO), a ß-Adrenergic receptor (ß-AR) nonselective agonist, was used to modulate chronic sympathetic activation in mice. As expected, our results proved that BR ameliorated ISO-induced cardiac dysfunction. Meanwhile, BR attenuated ISO-induced cardiac fibrosis and cardiac inflammation in mice. Moreover, BR also inhibited ISO-induced cardiac fibroblasts activation and macrophages pro-inflammatory secretion. As for mechanism studies, BR reduced ISO-induced cardiac fibroblasts by JAK2/STAT3 and PI3K/Akt signaling, while reduced ISO-induced macrophages pro-inflammatory secretion by JAK1/STAT3 and NF-κB signaling. In summary, BR alleviates cardiac fibrosis and inflammation caused by chronic sympathetic activation. The underlying mechanism involves BR-mediated suppression of JAK1/2/STAT3, PI3K/Akt and NF-κB signaling.

Baricitinib in the treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials.

Background: Baricitinib, a Janus Kinase (JAK) inhibitor, has emerged as a potential therapeutic option for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). This systematic review aims to synthesize evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the potential of baricitinib in treating SLE. Methods: A systematic search was conducted across electronic databases to identify relevant RCTs assessing baricitinib in patients with SLE. Studies reporting outcomes such as the Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Responder Index-4 (SRI-4), adverse events, and safety profiles were included. Data extraction and quality assessment were performed following PRISMA guidelines. Results: A total of four studies were evaluated for efficacy and safety of baricitinib therapy. Three studies reported SRI-4, British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG), and Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index-2000 (SLEDAI-2K), except for Dorner and colleagues Only Dorner and colleagues and Wallace and colleagues discuss the anti-dsDNA titres following treatment with baricitinib. The findings consistently demonstrated improved efficacy of baricitinib compared to placebo, particularly in terms of SRI-4 scores. Higher dosages of baricitinib showed significant improvement in disease activity and severity indices. Adverse events, including infections and gastrointestinal disturbances, were reported. Conclusion: Baricitinib holds promise for treating SLE, but caution is needed due to potential adverse events. Careful patient selection and monitoring are crucial. Future research should prioritize long-term safety and comparative effectiveness studies to better understand baricitinib's role in managing SLE.

Adverse reactions to Janus kinase inhibitors: Study of their incidence and predictive factors in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. / Reacciones adversas a inhibidores de quinasa Janus: estudio de su incidencia y de factores predictivos en los pacientes con artritis reumatoide.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The safety profile of Janus Kinase (JAK) inhibitors has acquired attention due to post-marketing observed adverse drug reactions. The study focuses on the analysis of adverse reactions related to tofacitinib, baricitinib, upadacitinib, and filgotinib in rheumatoid arthritis patients, including identifying predictive factors linked to their occurrence. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Observational retrospective study. Adult patients with rheumatoid arthritis from a university hospital receiving JAK inhibitor treatment between September 2017 and January 2024 were included. The cumulative incidence of each adverse reaction was calculated using the Naranjo scale. Risk factors for developing adverse reactions were identified through logistic regression analyses. RESULTS: Two hundred twenty-three patients were included, with 28.7% presenting adverse reaction related to JAK inhibitor treatment. The adverse drug reactions with the highest cumulative incidence were infections and gastrointestinal disorders. Infections included: upper respiratory tract (4.5%), cellulitis (3.1%), urinary tract (2.7%), herpes zoster (1.8%). Gastrointestinal disorders comprised: abdominal pain (4.0%), diarrhea (3.6%), nausea and vomiting (3.6%), gastrointestinal perforation (1.3%), diverticulitis (0.9%). Classified at 0.5% were: headache, paresthesias, skin rash, severe neutropenia, insomnia, dyspnea, hypertensive crisis. As risk factors, were identified: the treatment with a non-selective JAK inhibitor (OR adjusted: 4.03; 95% CI: 1.15-14.10; P=.029) and older age (OR adjusted: 1.03; 95% CI: 1.00-1.05; P=.036). CONCLUSIONS: Infections and gastrointestinal disorders represented the adverse reactions related to JAK inhibitor treatment with the highest cumulative incidence, with risk factors for their occurrence being non-selective JAK inhibitor treatment and older age of the patient.

Successful treatment of infantile refractory bullous pemphigoid with baricitinib.

Infantile bullous pemphigoid (BP) is a rare autoantibody-mediated skin disorder. We report the effective treatment of a 6-month-old infant with BP using baricitinib, a Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor, after failure with steroids and intravenous immunoglobulin. The patient achieved full remission and discontinued all medications without any relapses. To our knowledge, this is the first case of baricitinib used in an infant with BP.

A double-blind pilot study of oral baricitinib in adult patients with lupus erythematosus panniculitis.

Lupus erythematosus panniculitis (LEP) is a chronic inflammatory skin disease with a significant impact on the overall well-being of patients. The safety and efficacy of oral baricitinib for the treatment of LEP have not been studied. This study aimed to explore the efficacy of oral baricitinib in patients with LEP who are recalcitrant or intolerant to conventional therapies. Patients (aged ≥18 years) with active LEP (with a revised cutaneous lupus erythematosus disease area and severity index [RCLASI]-active score ≥4] were randomly assigned 2:1 to baricitinib (4 mg) or placebo (once daily for 20 weeks). The placebo group was switched to baricitinib (4 mg) at week 13, and the final evaluation was conducted at week 24. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with an RCLASI-A score decreased by 20% at week 12. The secondary endpoints included the changes in the Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Area and Severity Index active-(CLASI-A) score, the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), the Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) score, and safety. Five patients were enrolled. Three patients received baricitinib (4 mg), and two patients were treated with placebo. Two patients in the baricitinib treatment group showed a significant RCLASI-A decrease at week 12 and week 24. Two patients in the placebo group had no change in RCLASI-A at week 12 and a significant decrease at week 24. No new safety events were observed. Treatment with baricitinib was effective and well tolerated in patients with LEP.

Treatment Challenges in Alopecia Areata: Insights From a Case of Baricitinib Therapy Failure.

Alopecia areata (AA) has long been considered a challenging clinical condition, with dermatologists traditionally employing corticosteroids and immunosuppressants in search of effective solutions. The introduction of Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi), specifically the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval of baricitinib, marked a significant breakthrough in the treatment of AA. Clinical trials have shown promising results with baricitinib, and reports of relapse after initial success are scarce. We present a unique case of a 30-year-old male with severe patch-type AA who initially responded well to baricitinib treatment but later experienced a relapse despite continued treatment.

Management of JIA associated uveitis.

Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis (JIA) is the most common chronic rheumatic disease in childhood, and is associated with uveitis in up to 20-25% of cases. Typically, the uveitis is chronic, asymptomatic, non-granulomatous and anterior. For this reason, screening for uveitis is recommended to identify uveitis early and allow treatment to prevent sight-threatening complications. The management of JIA associated uveitis requires a multidisciplinary approach and a close collaboration between paediatric rheumatologist and ophthalmologist. Starting the appropriate treatment to control uveitis activity and prevent ocular complications is crucial. Current international recommendations advise a step-wise approach, starting with methotrexate and moving on to adalimumab if methotrexate alone is not sufficient to control the disease. If the uveitis remains active despite standard treatment other therapeutic options may be considered including anti-IL6 or other anti-TNF agents such as infliximab, although the evidence for these agents is limited.

How international guidelines recommend treating children who have severe COVID-19 or risk disease progression.

AIM: This study reviewed the current knowledge and guidelines on managing COVID-19 in children and proposed a practical approach to drug treatment. METHODS: We analysed international guidelines from four prominent scientific bodies on treating COVID-19 in children. These were the UK National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, the American National Institutes of Health, the Infectious Diseases Society of America and the Australian National Clinical Evidence Taskforce COVID-19. RESULTS: Most paediatric patients with COVID-19 only require symptomatic treatment. There was limited evidence on treatment recommendations for children with severe COVID-19 or at risk of disease progression. However, several drugs are available for children and we have summarised the guidelines, in order to provide a concise, practical format for clinicians. All the guidelines agree that nirmatrelvir plus ritonavir or remdesivir can be used as prophylaxis for severe COVID-19 in high-risk patients. Remdesivir can also be used for severe COVID-19 cases. Glucocorticosteroids are recommended, particularly in patients requiring oxygen therapy. Tocilizumab or baricitinib should be reserved for patients with progressive disease and/or signs of systemic inflammation. CONCLUSION: The guidelines provide useful advice and a degree of consensus on specific drug treatment for children with severe COVID-19 or at risk of progression.

Trivalent chromium versus baricitinib for rheumatoid arthritis treatment: first phase 2/3 randomized controlled trial, is trivalent chromium the upcoming immune-modulator?

BACKGROUND: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a debilitating disease mainly treated by DMARDs. Baricitinib is one of the emerging DMARDs with strong anti-rheumatic effects but has serious side effects. Trivalent chromium (Cr III) is a natural element with anti-inflammatory properties. Trivalent chromium (Cr III) is introduced for the first time to study its effect and safety in treatment of RA patients and compared to those of baricitinib. METHODS: This is a phase 2/3 randomized controlled trial where RA patients were divided in a ratio of 2:1 according to the newly introduced medication either Cr (III) (group A) or baricitinib (group B). Patients attended three visits on day 0, after 3 weeks and 12 weeks, disease activity was scored. Hands ultrasound was done and reassessed. Side effects were monitored throughout the study. RESULTS: DAS28-CRP improved by 26.9% and 11.8% on third visit for Cr III and baricitinib, respectively (p = 0.001). DAS28-ESR improved by 25.6% and 7.74% on third visit for Cr III and baricitinib, respectively (p = < 0.001). ACR 50 was 18.8% for Cr III and 5.7% for baricitinib on second visit. ACR 70 was 25% for Cr III and 0% for baricitinib on third visit (P = < 0.001). Ultrasound GLOESS, SH, PDUS, joints effusions improved by 38.9%, 38.4%, 56.7% and 74.8% for Cr III, while by 10.5%, 3.75%, 59.6% and worsening of joints effusions happened with baricitinib on third visit. p = 0.022 and 0.002 between groups for GLOESS and SH improvement, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Cr III has shown very promising fast clinical and sonographic results in treating RA patients which were surprisingly superior to baricitinib in most aspects. Furthermore, Cr III is potentially safe with evidently fewer side effects than baricitinib and other DMARDs, however, long-term safety is still not established. (IRB No.: 00012098- FWA No.: 00018699, Serial number: 040457) ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT05545020.

Baricitinib and Pulse Steroids Combination Treatment in Hyperinflammatory COVID-19: A Rheumatological Approach in the Intensive Care Unit.

Hyperinflammatory Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and rapidly-progressive interstitial lung diseases (RP-ILD) secondary to inflammatory myopathies (IIM) present important similarities. These data support the use of anti-rheumatic drugs for the treatment of COVID-19. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of combining baricitinib and pulse steroids with the Standard of Care (SoC) for the treatment of critically ill COVID-19 patients. We retrospectively enrolled consecutive patients admitted to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) with COVID-19-pneumonia. Patients treated with SoC (dexamethasone plus remdesivir) were compared to patients treated with baricitinib plus 6-methylprednisolone pulses (Rheuma-group). We enrolled 246 patients: 104/246 in the SoC and 142/246 in the Rheuma-group. All patients presented laboratory findings suggestive of hyperinflammatory response. Sixty-four patients (26.1%) died during ICU hospitalization. The mortality rate in the Rheuma-group was significantly lower than in the SoC-group (15.5 vs. 40.4%, p < 0.001). Compared to the SoC-group, patients in the Rheuma-group presented significantly lower inflammatory biomarker levels after one week of treatment. Higher ferritin levels after one week of treatment were strongly associated with mortality (p < 0.001). In this large real-life COVID-19 cohort, baricitinib and pulse steroids led to a significant reduction in mortality, paralleled by a prompt reduction in inflammatory biomarkers. Our experience supports the similarities between hyperinflammatory COVID-19 and the IIM-associated RP-ILD.

Effectiveness of baricitinib in acquired reactive perforating collagenosis: a case report.

Background: Acquired reactive perforating collagenosis (ARPC) poses a clinical challenge with an unclear pathogenesis. This disease has been frequently proven resistant to immunosuppressive treatments, significantly affecting the quality of life of patients. In this report, we highlight the efficacy of baricitinib as a viable option for maintenance therapy in ARPC. Case summary: An 81-year-old woman presented to our hospital with recurrent pruritus and cup-like ulcerated lesions on her trunk and limbs persisting for 1 year. She exhibited limited response to oral antihistamines and topical steroids. Past medical history revealed a prolonged history of coronary heart disease and type 2 diabetes spanning several years to decades. Histopathological examination revealed cup-shaped depressions filled with necrotic inflammatory debris. In the dermis, a mixed inflammatory infiltrate composed of lymphocytes and histiocytes was observed. Van Gieson staining indicated the elimination of fibrous tissue extending from the dermis into the epidermis. Consequently, a diagnosis of ARPC was established. Due to the inadequate response to conventional treatments and the severe itching, we initiated baricitinib therapy for ARPC, resulting in gradual symptom improvement. Follow-up assessments showed no adverse reactions and normal laboratory findings. Conclusion: The case report suggests that baricitinib might offer significant therapeutic benefits for ARPC.

Elicitation of expert prior opinion to design the BARJDM trial in juvenile dermatomyositis.

OBJECTIVES: To elicit and quantify expert opinion concerning the relative merits of two treatments for a rare inflammatory disease: Juvenile dermatomyositis (JDM). The formal expression of expert opinion reported in this paper will be used in a Bayesian analysis of a forthcoming randomised controlled trial known as BARJDM (baricitinib for juvenile dermatomyositis). METHODS: A Bayesian prior elicitation meeting was convened, following a previously described methodological template. Opinion was sought on the probability that a patient in the BARJDM trial would achieve clinically inactive disease, off glucocorticoids (GC) within a 12-month period with either methotrexate (standard of care); or baricitinib (a Janus kinase inhibitor, JAKi), with GC schedules identical in both arms of the trial. Experts' views were discussed and refined following presentation and further discussion of summated published data regarding efficacy of methotrexate or JAKi for JDM. RESULTS: Ten UK paediatric rheumatology consultants (including one adolescent paediatric rheumatologist) participated in the elicitation meeting. All had expertise in JDM, leading active National Health Service clinics for this disease. Consensus expert prior opinion was that the most likely probability of clinically inactive disease off GC within 12 months was 0.55 on baricitinib and 0.23 on methotrexate, with a greater degree of uncertainty for baricitinib. CONCLUSION: Experts currently think that baricitinib is superior to MTX for the treatment of JDM, although there is uncertainty around this. BARJDM will therefore integrate randomised trial data with this expert prior opinion to derive a posterior distribution for the relative efficacy of baricitinib compared with MTX.

JAK inhibitors in refractory dermatomyositis: A case series.

This retrospective cohort study assessed the efficacy and safety of Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors, tofacitinib and baricitinib, in 14 patients with refractory dermatomyositis (DM), a multisystemic autoimmune disorder with limited therapeutic options. Results demonstrated a significant median decrease of 21 points and a 76% reduction in the Cutaneous Dermatomyositis Disease Area and Severity Index (CDASI) scores, along with a complete resolution of muscular symptoms in 64% of the patients. JAK inhibitors were effective in managing refractory DM across various subtypes with mild and manageable adverse events.

Effect of JAK Inhibitors on the Risk of Death in Patients with Moderate to Severe COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Background: The pathophysiology of COVID-19 involves a signalling pathway based on the Janus kinases (JAKs) and the signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT) family of proteins. As such, there has been growing interest in exploring JAK inhibitors as potential therapeutic agents for this disease. Objective: To provide a comprehensive summary of the efficacy of JAK inhibitors in the treatment of COVID-19 through a systematic review and meta-analysis. Data Sources: A systematic literature search was conducted in multiple electronic databases (PubMed, Scopus, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials) and preprint repositories, without language restrictions, to identify relevant studies published up to December 31, 2023. Study Selection and Data Extraction: The primary outcome of interest was all-cause mortality. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating the administration of JAK inhibitors in patients with COVID-19 were included. Data Synthesis: Through the systematic literature search, a total of 20 RCTs meeting the inclusion criteria were identified. A random-effects model was employed to estimate the pooled odds ratio for death with administration of a JAK inhibitor relative to non-administration of such an agent, with 95% confidence interval. Meta-analysis of these trials revealed a significant reduction in mortality among patients with COVID-19 who received JAK inhibitors relative to those who did not receive these agents (pooled odds ratio 0.70, 95% confidence interval 0.58-0.84). Conclusions: The results of this systematic review and meta-analysis suggest that JAK inhibitors, specifically baricitinib, may address the urgent need for effective treatments in the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic by reducing the risk of death among affected patients. However, further research, including larger-scale RCTs, is needed to establish the efficacy and safety of other JAK inhibitors in the treatment of COVID-19 and to generate more robust evidence regarding their use in this specific patient population.

Contexte: La physiopathologie de la COVID-19 implique une voie de signalisation basée sur les Janus kinases (JAK) et les protéines STAT (pour signal transducer and activator of transcription en anglais, soit, les protéines transductrices de signal et activatrices de transcription). C'est pourquoi l'étude des inhibiteurs de JAK en tant qu'agents thérapeutiques potentiels pour cette maladie suscite un intérêt croissant. Objectif: Fournir un résumé complet de l'efficacité des inhibiteurs de JAK dans le traitement de la COVID-19 grâce à une revue systématique et une méta-analyse. Sources des données: Une recherche systématique de la littérature a été menée dans plusieurs bases de données électroniques (PubMed, Scopus et le Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials) et dans les référentiels de prépublications, sans restrictions linguistiques, pour identifier les études pertinentes publiées jusqu'au 31 décembre 2023. Sélection des études et extraction des données: Le principal résultat d'intérêt était la mortalité, toutes causes confondues. Des essais contrôlés randomisés (ECR) portant sur l'administration d'inhibiteurs de JAK chez des patients atteints de COVID-19 ont été inclus. Synthèse des données: Grâce à la recherche documentaire systématique, un total de 20 ECR répondant aux critères d'inclusion ont été identifiés. Un modèle à effets aléatoires a été utilisé pour estimer le rapport de cotes groupé de décès avec l'administration d'un inhibiteur de JAK par rapport à la non-administration d'un tel agent, avec un intervalle de confiance de 95 %. La méta-analyse de ces essais a révélé une réduction significative de la mortalité chez les patients atteints de COVID-19 ayant reçu des inhibiteurs de JAK par rapport à ceux n'ayant pas reçu ces agents (rapport de cotes groupé 0,70, intervalle de confiance à 95 % 0,58­0,84). Conclusions: Les résultats de cette revue systématique et méta-analyse indiquent que les inhibiteurs de JAK, en particulier le baricitinib, pourraient répondre au besoin urgent de traitements efficaces dans le cadre de la pandémie de COVID-19 en cours en réduisant le risque de décès parmi les patients touchés. Cependant, des recherches supplémentaires, y compris des ECR à plus grande échelle, sont nécessaires pour établir l'efficacité et l'innocuité d'autres inhibiteurs de JAK dans le traitement de la COVID-19 et pour générer des éléments probants plus solides concernant leur utilisation dans cette population de patients en particulier.