ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: If the mother and infant cannot meet after birth, it is recommended to express milk and give it to the infant. There was evidence indicating that there might be decrease in essential nutrient values in human milk content depending on the expression technique in literature. The goal of this systematic review was to investigate the effect of human milk expression techniques on the macronutrient milk content and establish an evidence base for future studies. METHODS: Studies investigating the effect of human milk expression techniques on milk content were reviewed without year limitations. A literature review was conducted in six electronic databases (MEDLINE, Web of Science, PubMed, ScienceDirect, CINAHL and Cochrane) until 30 May 2021, using the keywords of breast milk expression techniques, milk content and breast milk pumping. RESULTS: From 258 articles initially screened, we included 6 articles in the systematic review. The fat, protein and lactose content of human milk was analyzed in the studies reviewed. It was concluded that there was no significant effect on the protein (9.7-9.8 g/dl and 2.1-2.1 g/dl, respectively) and lactose (6.50-6.53% and 6.1-6.1 g/dl, respectively) content of milk. However, the fat (58.30, 48.81g/l; 2.6-2.2 g/dl) content was affected. CONCLUSIONS: This study investigated the effect of milk expression techniques on the macronutrient content of human milk, and it was concluded that there was no significant effect on the protein and carbohydrate content of milk. However, the fat content was affected. Limitation of this study is that some factors that might affect the content of human milk were not standardized sufficiently in the included studies.
Subject(s)
Milk, Human , Nutrients , Female , Humans , Infant , Lactose , MothersABSTRACT
Objective: Coordinating breast milk pumping sessions is challenging for lactating anesthesiologists who supervise multiple simultaneous anesthetics. We quantify the minimum percentages of adjacent operating rooms (ORs) for which there could reliably (≥95%) be at least 30 minutes during the surgical time when the anesthesiologist covering three anesthetics could have her rooms covered by another anesthesiologist. Methods: The historical cohort study was from a large U.S. teaching hospital. We calculated the 5% lower prediction bounds of surgical times from 3 years of historical data, and then applied them to surgical start times from adjacent ORs during the next 1 year. Results: For >2/3rd of cases, an anesthesiologist supervising three ORs would lack a reliable 30-minute period of overlapping surgical times, and an even smaller chance per case at the ambulatory surgery center, 10% (9-11%). For approximately 42% (41-43%) of sufficiently long individual cases, there was absence of a 30-minute period during which both of the two adjacent ORs' cases were suitable for the anesthesiologist to receive a break (p < 0.0001 compared with one-third). Conclusions: Even when making assumptions that were deliberately unrealistic (e.g., anesthesiologists' responsibilities are only for ongoing OR cases), there is no practical mechanism for an anesthesiologist supervising three ORs to start cases, be relieved for a breast milk pumping session, and then return in time for the end of the anesthetics (e.g., tracheal extubation). Departments with anesthesiologists who are breastfeeding should consider having options for temporary clinical assignments, commensurate with training and experience, that do not require supervising >2 ORs.
Subject(s)
Anesthesiologists , Anesthesiology , Breast Feeding , Cohort Studies , Female , Humans , Lactation , Milk, Human , Operating RoomsABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To estimate the effect of early, regular breast-milk pumping on time to breast-milk feeding (BMF) and exclusive BMF cessation, for working and non-working women. DESIGN: Using the Infant Feeding Practices Survey II (IFPS II), we estimated weighted hazard ratios (HR) for the effect of regular pumping (participant defined) compared with non-regular/not pumping, reported at month 2, on both time to BMF cessation (to 12 months) and time to exclusive BMF cessation (to 6 months), using inverse probability weights to control confounding. SETTING: USA, 2005-2007. SUBJECTS: BMF (n 1624) and exclusively BMF (n 971) IFPS II participants at month 2. RESULTS: The weighted HR for time to BMF cessation was 1·62 (95 % CI 1·47, 1·78) and for time to exclusive BMF cessation was 1·14 (95 % CI 1·03, 1·25). Among non-working women, the weighted HR for time to BMF cessation was 2·05 (95 % CI 1·84, 2·28) and for time to exclusive BMF cessation was 1·10 (95 % CI 0·98, 1·22). Among working women, the weighted HR for time to BMF cessation was 0·90 (95 % CI 0·75, 1·07) and for time to exclusive BMF cessation was 1·14 (95 % CI 0·96, 1·36). CONCLUSIONS: Overall, regular pumpers were more likely to stop BMF and exclusive BMF than non-regular/non-pumpers. Non-working regular pumpers were more likely than non-regular/non-pumpers to stop BMF. There was no effect among working women. Early, regular pumpers may need specialized support to maintain BMF.