Challenges and opportunities for identifying people with Familial hypercholesterolaemia in the UK: Evidence from the National FH PASS database.

BACKGROUND: Familial Hypercholesterolaemia (FH) is a monogenic disorder that causes high levels of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol. Cascade testing, where relatives of known individuals with FH ('index') are genetically tested, is effective and cost-effective, but implementation in the UK varies. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to provide evidence on current UK FH cascade yields and to identify common obstacles cascade services face and individual- and service-level predictors of success. METHODS: Electronic health records from 875 index families and 5,958 linked relatives in the UK's Welsh and Wessex FH services (2019) were used to explore causes for non-testing and to estimate testing rates, detection yields, and how relative characteristics and contact methods relate to the probability of relatives being tested (using logistic regression). RESULTS: In Wales (Wessex), families included 7.35 (7.01) members on average, with 2.41 (1.66) relatives tested and 1.35 (0.96) diagnosed with FH per index. Cascade testing is limited by individualised circumstances (too young, not at-risk, etc.) and FH services' reach, with approximately one in four relatives out-of-area. In Wales, first-degree relatives (odds ratio (OR):1.55 [95 % confidence interval (CI):1.28,1.88]) and directly contacted relatives (OR:2.11 [CI:1.66,2.69]) were more likely to be tested. In Wales and Wessex, women were more likely to be tested than men (ORs:1.53 [CI:1.28,1.85] and 1.74 [CI:1.32,2.27]). CONCLUSION: In Wales and Wessex less than a third of relatives of an index are tested for FH. Improvements are likely possible by integrating geographically dispersed families into cascade testing, services directly contacting relatives where possible, and finding new ways to encourage participation, particularly amongst men.

Cascade testing in mitochondrial diseases: a cross-sectional retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Cascade testing can offer improved surveillance and timely introduction of clinical management for the at-risk biological relatives. Data on cascade testing and costs in mitochondrial diseases are lacking. To address this gap, we performed a cross-sectional retrospective study to provide a framework for cascade testing in mitochondrial diseases, to estimate the eligibility versus real-time uptake of cascade testing and to evaluate the cost of the genetic diagnosis of index cases and the cost of predictive cascade testing. METHODS: Data was collected through retrospective chart review. The variant inheritance pattern guided the identification of eligible first-degree relatives: (i) Males with mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) single nucleotide variants (SNVs) - siblings and mothers. (ii) Females with mtDNA SNVs - siblings, mothers and offspring. (iii) Autosomal Dominant (AD) nuclear DNA (nDNA) variants - siblings, offspring and both parents. (iv) Autosomal Recessive (AR) nDNA variants - siblings. RESULTS: We recruited 99 participants from the Adult Mitochondrial Disease Clinic in Sydney. The uptake of cascade testing was 55.2% in the mtDNA group, 55.8% in the AD nDNA group and 0% in AR nDNA group. Of the relatives in mtDNA group who underwent cascade testing, 65.4% were symptomatic, 20.5% were oligosymptomatic and 14.1% were asymptomatic. The mean cost of cascade testing for eligible first-degree relatives (mtDNA group: $694.7; AD nDNA group: $899.1) was lower than the corresponding index case (mtDNA group: $4578.4; AD nDNA group: $5715.1) (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The demand for cascade testing in mitochondrial diseases varies according to the genotype and inheritance pattern. The real-time uptake of cascade testing can be influenced by multiple factors. Early diagnosis of at-risk biological relatives of index cases through cascade testing, confirms the diagnosis in those who are symptomatic and facilitates implementation of surveillance strategies and clinical care at an early stage of the disease.

Factors Impacting Intent to Share Multigenic Cancer Testing Results in a Community Hospital Setting.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Multi-gene, multi-cancer, hereditary cancer risk screenings may be useful in cancer prevention and treatment, not only for cancer patients but also for patients' family members. If genetic cancer screening is to have the widest possible benefit, it must be extended into diverse cancer care settings that serve diverse patient communities, providing cancer patients and their relatives with individualized cancer risk evaluations. Little research, to date, has examined the impact of extending multigenic cancer screening into diverse settings. Without empirical data characterizing the support needs of cancer patients and their family members, we may not adequately satisfy the needs of all patients and risk exacerbating existing disparities in cancer care and outcomes. METHODS: We examined patient perspectives on the sharing of genetic results with at-risk family members by surveying a racially diverse sample of cancer patients receiving a multi-gene, multi-cancer risk screen in a community hospital setting. RESULTS: In a survey of 230 cancer patients, we found that intent to share results with family members was high but varied across family member types. More respondents planned to disclose results to at least one sister (82.5%) compared to at least one brother (73.1%). Over one-fourth of participants (27.4%) were either uncertain about sharing or intended to withhold their genomic screening results from at least one at-risk family member eligible for cascade testing. Participants were more likely to withhold their results from a sibling than from a child. Furthermore, intent to share across all family member types was lower if probands failed to identify at least one benefit to sharing. CONCLUSIONS: Understanding factors associated with decisions to share results with at-risk relatives in diverse patient populations can help clinicians support cascade genetic cancer screenings in diverse communities and settings.

Alport Syndrome: Clinical Utility of Early Genetic Diagnosis in Children.

Alport syndrome (AS) is a hereditary glomerulopathy due to pathogenic variants in COL4A3, COL4A4, and COL4A5. Treatment with Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System (RAAS) inhibitors can delay progression to end stage renal disease (ESRD). From 2018 until today, we performed Whole Exome Sequencing (WES) in 19 patients with AS phenotype with or without positive family history. Fourteen of these patients were children. Genetic testing was extended to family members at risk. All patients received a genetic diagnosis of AS: five X-linked AS (XLAS) males, five X-linked AS (XLAS) females, six autosomal dominant AS (ADAS), and one autosomal recessive AS (ARAS). After cascade screening four XLAS males and eight XLAS females, six ADAS and three ARAS heterozygotes were added to our initial results. Fifteen patients were eligible to start treatment with RAAS inhibitors after their diagnosis. All XLAS female patients, ARAS heterozygotes, and ADAS have been advised to be followed up, so that therapeutic intervention can begin in the presence of microalbuminuria. Genetic diagnosis of AS ensures early therapeutic intervention and appropriate follow up to delay progression to chronic kidney disease, especially in thet pediatric population.

The Role of Reverse Cascade Screening in Children with Familial Hypercholesterolemia: A Literature Review and Analysis.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Familial Hypercholesterolemia (FH) is a common genetic disorder characterized by lifelong elevation of severely elevated plasma low-density lipoprotein cholesterol. Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk accelerates after age 20. Early diagnosis allows for treatment of children with FH and creates an opportunity to identify affected relatives through reverse cascade screening (RCS). Historically, cascade screening has had little impact on identifying individuals with FH. RECENT FINDINGS: Universal cholesterol screening (UCS) to identify youth with FH, beginning at 9-11 years-of-age, is currently recommended in the U.S. The European Atherosclerosis Society has called for UCS worldwide, emphasizing the need for educational programs to increase awareness amongst healthcare professions. Underdiagnoses and undertreatment of FH remain high. Improved rates of UCS and a systematic approach to RCS are needed. The absence of a coordinated RCS program limits the benefits of UCS. Further research is needed to identify barriers to cholesterol screening in youth.

Cascade screening for familial hypercholesterolemia from pediatric index cases diagnosed through universal screening.

Heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HeFH) is an autosomal dominant disorder causing elevated low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and premature atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Universal cholesterol screening in childhood leads to children serving as the index case for their family, but efficacy of cascade screening and genetic counseling in this population is not well understood. The institutional pediatric lipid clinic database was queried from 2011 to 2022 for subjects <18 years who met clinical HeFH diagnostic criteria (N = 256). Median peak LDL-C was 198 mg/dL (interquartile range 179-238 mg/dL) and 69.5 % of subjects were the index case. The number of new HeFH cases identified per index case was 3.55 ± 1.87. Genetic counseling was offered to 38.7 % of subjects and genetic testing was completed by 10.9 %, 53.6 % of whom had a pathogenic or likely pathogenic genetic variant for HeFH. Our findings highlight the effectiveness of cascade screening from pediatric index cases identified through universal screening. However, genetic counseling and genetic testing may be underutilized in this population.

Evaluation of the 2021 ESC recommendations for family screening in hereditary transthyretin cardiac amyloidosis.

AIMS: The 2021 European Society of Cardiology (ESC) screening recommendations for individuals carrying a pathogenic transthyretin amyloidosis variant (ATTRv) are based on expert opinion. We aimed to (i) determine the penetrance of ATTRv cardiomyopathy (ATTRv-CM) at baseline; (ii) examine the value of serial evaluation; and (iii) establish the yield of first-line diagnostic tests (i.e. electrocardiogram, echocardiogram, and laboratory tests) as per 2021 ESC position statement. METHODS AND RESULTS: We included 159 relatives (median age 55.6 [43.2-65.9] years, 52% male) at risk for ATTRv-CM from 10 centres. The primary endpoint, ATTRv-CM diagnosis, was defined as the presence of (i) cardiac tracer uptake in bone scintigraphy; or (ii) transthyretin-positive cardiac biopsy. The secondary endpoint was a composite of heart failure (New York Heart Association class ≥II) and pacemaker-requiring conduction disorders. At baseline, 40/159 (25%) relatives were diagnosed with ATTRv-CM. Of those, 20 (50%) met the secondary endpoint. Indication to screen (≤10 years prior to predicted disease onset and absence of extracardiac amyloidosis) had an excellent negative predictive value (97%). Other pre-screening predictors for ATTRv-CM were infrequently identified variants and male sex. Importantly, 13% of relatives with ATTRv-CM did not show any signs of cardiac involvement on first-line diagnostic tests. The yield of serial evaluation (n = 41 relatives; follow-up 3.1 [2.2-5.2] years) at 3-year interval was 9.4%. CONCLUSIONS: Screening according to the 2021 ESC position statement performs well in daily clinical practice. Clinicians should adhere to repeating bone scintigraphy after 3 years, as progressing to ATTRv-CM without signs of ATTRv-CM on first-line diagnostic tests or symptoms is common.

Algorithm for detection and screening of familial hypercholesterolemia in Lithuanian population.

BACKGROUND: Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is one of the most common autosomal dominant diseases. FH causes a lifelong increase in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels, which in turn leads to atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. The incidence of FH is widely underestimated and undertreated, despite the availability and effectiveness of lipid-lowering therapy. Patients with FH have an increased cardiovascular risk; therefore, early diagnosis and treatment are vital. To address the burden of FH, several countries have implemented national FH screening programmes. The currently used method for FH detection in Lithuania is mainly based on opportunistic testing with subsequent cascade screening of index cases' first-degree relatives. METHODS: A total of 428 patients were included in this study. Patients with suspected FH are referred to a lipidology center for thorough evaluation. Patients who met the criteria for probable or definite FH according to the Dutch Lipid Clinic Network (DLCN) scoring system and/or had LDL-C > = 6.5 mmol/l were subjected to genetic testing. Laboratory and instrumental tests, vascular marker data of early atherosclerosis, and consultations by other specialists, such as radiologists and ophthalmologists, were also recorded. RESULTS: A total of 127/428 (30%) patients were genetically tested. FH-related mutations were found in 38.6% (n = 49/127) of the patients. Coronary artery disease (CAD) was diagnosed in 13% (n = 57/428) of the included patients, whereas premature CAD was found in 47/428 (11%) patients. CAD was diagnosed in 19% (n = 9/49) of patients with FH-related mutations, and this diagnosis was premature for all of them. CONCLUSIONS: Most patients in this study were classified as probable or possible FH without difference of age and sex. The median age of FH diagnosis was 47 years with significantly older females than males, which refers to the strong interface of this study with the LitHir programme. CAD and premature CAD were more common among patients with probable and definite FH, as well as those with an FH-causing mutation. The algorithm described in this study is the first attempt in Lithuania to implement a specific tool which allows to maximise FH detection rates, establish an accurate diagnosis of FH, excluding secondary causes of dyslipidaemia, and to select patients for cascade screening initiation more precisely.

Genetic Screening-Emerging Issues.

In many countries, some form of genetic screening is offered to all or part of the population, either in the form of well-organized screening programs or in a less formalized way. Screening can be offered at different phases of life, such as preconception, prenatal, neonatal and later in life. Screening should only be offered if the advantages outweigh the disadvantages. Technical innovations in testing and treatment are driving changes in the field of prenatal and neonatal screening, where many jurisdictions have organized population-based screening programs. As a result, a greater number and wider range of conditions are being added to the programs, which can benefit couples' reproductive autonomy (preconception and prenatal screening) and improve early diagnosis to prevent irreversible health damage in children (neonatal screening) and in adults (cancer and cascade screening). While many developments in screening are technology-driven, citizens may also express a demand for innovation in screening, as was the case with non-invasive prenatal testing. Relatively new emerging issues for genetic screening, especially if testing is performed using DNA sequencing, relate to organization, data storage and interpretation, benefit-harm ratio and distributive justice, information provision and follow-up, all connected to acceptability in current healthcare systems.

Family cascade screening for equitable identification of familial hypercholesterolemia: study protocol for a hybrid effectiveness-implementation type III randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is a heritable disorder affecting 1.3 million individuals in the USA. Eighty percent of people with FH are undiagnosed, particularly minoritized populations including Black or African American people, Asian or Asian American people, and women across racial groups. Family cascade screening is an evidence-based practice that can increase diagnosis and improve health outcomes but is rarely implemented in routine practice, representing an important care gap. In pilot work, we leveraged best practices from behavioral economics and implementation science-including mixed-methods contextual inquiry with clinicians, patients, and health system constituents-to co-design two patient-facing implementation strategies to address this care gap: (a) an automated health system-mediated strategy and (b) a nonprofit foundation-mediated strategy with contact from a foundation-employed care navigator. This trial will test the comparative effectiveness of these strategies on completion of cascade screening for relatives of individuals with FH, centering equitable reach. METHODS: We will conduct a hybrid effectiveness-implementation type III randomized controlled trial testing the comparative effectiveness of two strategies for implementing cascade screening with 220 individuals with FH (i.e., probands) per arm identified from a large northeastern health system. The primary implementation outcome is reach, or the proportion of probands with at least one first-degree biological relative (parent, sibling, child) in the USA who is screened for FH through the study. Our secondary implementation outcomes include the number of relatives screened and the number of relatives meeting the American Heart Association criteria for FH. Our secondary clinical effectiveness outcome is post-trial proband cholesterol level. We will also use mixed methods to identify implementation strategy mechanisms for implementation strategy effectiveness while centering equity. DISCUSSION: We will test two patient-facing implementation strategies harnessing insights from behavioral economics that were developed collaboratively with constituents. This trial will improve our understanding of how to implement evidence-based cascade screening for FH, which implementation strategies work, for whom, and why. Learnings from this trial can be used to equitably scale cascade screening programs for FH nationally and inform cascade screening implementation efforts for other genetic disorders. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05750667. Registered 15 February 2023-retrospectively registered, https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05750667 .

Familial hypercholesterolemia.

Familial hypercholesterolemia is a common genetic disorder of autosomal inheritance associated with elevated LDL-cholesterol. It is estimated to affect 1:250 individuals in general population roughly estimated to be 5 million in India. The prevalence of FH is higher in young CAD patients (<55 years in men; <60 years in women). FH is underdiagnosed and undertreated. Screening during childhood and Cascade screening of family members of known FH patients is of utmost importance in order to prevent the burden of CAD. Early identification of FH patients and early initiation of the lifelong lipid lowering therapy is the most effective strategy for managing FH. FH management includes pharmaceutical agents (statins and non statin drugs) and lifestyle modification. Inspite of maximum dose of statin with or without Ezetimibe, if target levels of LDL-C are not achieved, Bempedoic acid, proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) Inhibitors/Inclisiran can be added.

Experience with cascade screening: A comprehensive family pedigree analysis of two index patients with Fabry disease.

The wide range of clinical symptoms observed in patients with Fabry disease (FD) often leads to delays in diagnosis and initiation of treatment. Delayed initiation of therapy may result in end-organ damage, such as chronic renal failure, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, and stroke. Although some tools are available to identify undiagnosed patients, new comprehensive screening methods are needed. In this study, the outcomes of the cascade screening applied to three index cases with FD from 2 familes were investigated. In the pedigree analysis, 280 individuals were included; out of them, 131 individuals underwent genetic testing and cascade screening for FD. During the screening program, a total of 45 individuals were diagnosed, with a diagnostic ratio of 1:15. The average age at diagnosis for all individuals was 30.9 ± 17.7 years, and %25 were pediatric cases (mean age 9.5 ± 5.9 years). Thirty affected relatives were diagnosed from the two index cases in Family 1 and 15 individuals were diagnosed from one index case in Family 2. There were 13 consanguineous marriages observed among 2 pedigres, in two both spouses  were affected, leading to two homozygous affected daughters in one couple. In regions where there is a high prevalence of consanguineous marriages, implementing the cascade screening approach to identify all individuals at risk can be beneficial for patients with FD, specifically women and children.

A systematic review of cost-effectiveness analysis of different screening strategies for familial hypercholesterolemia.

AIMS: Diagnosis rate of familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) remained less than 10 % globally and the economic evaluation results of different FH screening strategies varied. This study aimed to systematically review the methodology and results of cost effectiveness analysis (CEA) of FH screening, which will provide evidence support for health-related decision-making. METHODS: The Medline/PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of science, National Health Service Economic Evaluation Database (NHSEED) and CEA Registry databases were electronically searched to collect full economic evaluation from the establishment of the databases to June 30, 2022. The quality of included studies was evaluated by the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards statement 2022 (CHEERS 2022) checklist. RESULTS: Among 232 retrieved studies, 18 economic evaluations were included and all of them are from developed countries, with an average quality score of 0.73. The decision tree model and/or Markov model were constructed by thirteen articles (72 %). Twelve studies (67 %) adopted the healthcare perspective and the lifetime horizon to compare the costs and health outcome of different screening strategies. The results of eight studies indicated that cascade screening was a cost-effective strategy compared with no screening, which was more pronounced in younger adults. Universal screening in young adults aged 16 years or 18-40 years (n=3) and in children aged 1-2 years combined with reverse cascade screening (n=3) are both cost-effective. The probability of being cost-effective for cascade screening (n=6) and universal screening (n=1) of young aged 18-40 years were greater than 95 %. CONCLUSIONS: Our review demonstrated the economic advantages of cascade screening, universal screening of young adults, and universal screening of newborns combined with reverse cascade screening. Further health economic evaluation is needed in children and in low- and middle-income countries.

Genetic Spectrum and Cascade Screening of Familial Hypercholesterolemia in Routine Clinical Setting in Hong Kong.

Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is a prevalent but often underdiagnosed monogenic disorder affecting lipoprotein metabolism, and genetic testing for FH has not been widely conducted in Asia in the past. In this cross-sectional study of 31 probands (19 adults and 12 children) and an addition of 15 individuals (12 adults and 3 children), who underwent genetic testing and cascade screening for FH, respectively, during the period between February 2015 and July 2023, we identified a total of 25 distinct LDLR variants in 71.0% unrelated probands. Among the adult proband cohort, a higher proportion of genetically confirmed cases exhibited a positive family history of premature cardiovascular disease. Treatment intensity required to achieve an approximate 50% reduction in pretreatment low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) exhibited potentially better diagnostic performance compared to pretreatment LDL-C levels, Dutch Lipid Clinic Network Diagnostic Criteria (DLCNC) score, and modified DLCNC score. Adult individuals identified through cascade screening demonstrated less severe phenotypes, and fewer of them met previously proposed local criteria for FH genetic testing compared to the probands, indicating that cascade screening played a crucial role in the early detection of new cases that might otherwise have gone undiagnosed. These findings underscore the significance of genetic testing and cascade screening in the accurate identification and management of FH cases.

Does a proactive procedure lead to a higher uptake of predictive testing in families with a pathogenic BRCA1/BRCA2 variant? A family cancer clinic evaluation.

The uptake of genetic counseling and predictive genetic testing by family members at risk for hereditary tumor syndromes is generally below 50%. To address this issue, a new guideline was introduced in the Netherlands in 2019 that aims to improve the sharing of information within families. In addition to cascade screening supported by follow-up telephone calls with the proband, municipal records were accessed to allow the geneticist to contact at-risk family members directly. We evaluated this procedure in 32 families with a (likely) pathogenic germline BRCA1/BRCA2 variant diagnosed at our hospital between May 1, 2020, and July 31, 2021, comparing current uptake with outcomes achieved for 33 families diagnosed in 2014. Fifteen months after diagnostic testing of the proband, the uptake was 43% (120/277), comparable to the 44% (87/200) registered previously. Among a subgroup of women at 50% risk aged 25-75 years, 71% (47/66) were tested, comparable to an earlier uptake of 69% (59/86). Of the 34 at-risk relatives we contacted directly, 17 (50%) underwent predictive testing. In conclusion, we found no evidence that the new procedure leads to a substantially increased uptake. Future research should be primarily aimed at understanding intrafamilial communication barriers.

The German CaRe high registry for familial hypercholesterolemia - Sex differences, treatment strategies, and target value attainment.

Background and aims: Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is among the most common genetic disorders in primary care. However, only 15% or less of patients are diagnosed, and few achieve the goals for low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C). In this analysis of the German Cascade Screening and Registry for High Cholesterol (CaRe High), we examined the status of lipid management, treatment strategies, and LDL-C goal attainment according to the ESC/EAS dyslipidemia guidelines. Methods: We evaluated consolidated datasets from 1501 FH patients diagnosed clinically and seen either by lipid specialists or general practitioners and internists. We conducted a questionnaire survey of both the recruiting physicians and patients. Results: Among the 1501 patients, 86% regularly received lipid-lowering drugs. LDL-C goals were achieved by 26% and 10% of patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) according to the 2016 and 2019 ESC/EAS dyslipidemia guidelines, respectively. High intensity lipid-lowering was administered more often in men than in women, in patients with ASCVD, at higher LDL-C and in patients with a genetic diagnosis of FH. Conclusions: FH is under-treated in Germany compared to guideline recommendations. Male gender, genetic proof of FH, treatment by a specialist, and presence of ASCVD appear to be associated with increased treatment intensity. Achieving the LDL-C goals of the 2019 ESC/EAS dyslipidemia guidelines remains challenging if pre-treatment LDL-C is very high.

Extended Family Outreach in Hereditary Cancer Using Web-Based Genealogy, Direct-to-Consumer Ancestry Genetics, and Social Media: Mixed Methods Process Evaluation of the ConnectMyVariant Intervention.

BACKGROUND: Cascade screening, defined as helping at-risk relatives get targeted genetic testing of familial variants for dominant hereditary cancer syndromes, is a proven component of cancer prevention; however, its uptake is low. We developed and conducted a pilot study of the ConnectMyVariant intervention, in which participants received support to contact at-risk relatives that extended beyond first-degree relatives and encourage relatives to obtain genetic testing and connect with others having the same variant through email and social media. The support that participants received included listening to participants' needs, assisting with documentary genealogy to find common ancestors, facilitating direct-to-consumer DNA testing and interpretation, and assisting with database searches. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to assess intervention feasibility, motivations for participating, and engagement among ConnectMyVariant participants and their families. METHODS: We used a mixed methods design including both quantitative and qualitative evaluation methods. First, we considered intervention feasibility by characterizing recruitment and retention using multiple recruitment mechanisms, including web-based advertising, dissemination of invitations with positive test results, provider recruitment, snowball sampling, and recruitment through web-based social networks and research studies. Second, we characterized participants' motivations, concerns, and engagement through project documentation of participant engagement in outreach activities and qualitative analysis of participant communications. We used an inductive qualitative data analysis approach to analyze emails, free-text notes, and other communications generated with participants as part of the ConnectMyVariant intervention. RESULTS: We identified 84 prospective participants using different recruitment mechanisms; 57 participants were ultimately enrolled in the study for varying lengths of time. With respect to motivations for engaging in the intervention, participants were most interested in activities relating to genealogy and communication with others who had their specific variants. Although there was a desire to find others with the same variant and prevent cancer, more participants expressed an interest in learning about their genealogy and family health history, with prevention in relatives considered a natural side effect of outreach. Concerns about participation included whether relatives would be open to communication, how to go about it, and whether others with a specific variant would be motivated to help find common ancestors. We observed that ConnectMyVariant participants engaged in 6 primary activities to identify and communicate with at-risk relatives: sharing family history, family member testing, direct-to-consumer genealogy genetic testing analysis, contacting (distant) relatives, documentary genealogy, and expanding variant groups or outreach. Participants who connected with others who had the same variant were more likely to engage with several extended family outreach activities. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that there is an interest in extended family outreach as a mechanism to improve cascade screening for hereditary cancer prevention. Additional research to systematically evaluate the outcomes of such outreach may be challenging but is warranted.