Efficacy and Safety of Olaparib Plus Abiraterone Versus Placebo Plus Abiraterone in the First-line Treatment of Patients with Asymptomatic/Mildly Symptomatic and Symptomatic Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer: Analyses from the Phase 3 PROpel Trial.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: In PROpel (NCT03732820), olaparib + abiraterone resulted in a statistically significant radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS) benefit and numerically prolonged overall survival (OS) versus placebo + abiraterone in first-line (1L) metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients. Here, we report post hoc exploratory subgroup analyses in patients with asymptomatic/mildly symptomatic or symptomatic disease at baseline. METHODS: Patients were randomised 1:1 to olaparib (300 mg b.i.d.) or placebo with abiraterone (1000 mg o.d.) + prednisone/prednisolone (5 mg b.i.d.). For this post hoc exploratory analysis, patients with a Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-SF) item 3 score of <4 and no opiate use were classified as asymptomatic/mildly symptomatic; those with a BPI-SF item 3 score of ≥4 and/or opiate use were classified as symptomatic. Subgroup analyses included investigator-assessed rPFS, OS, objective response rate, time to second progression or death, health-related quality of life, and safety. KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS: The median rPFS in asymptomatic/mildly symptomatic patients (n = 560) was 27.6 mo for olaparib + abiraterone versus 19.1 mo for placebo + abiraterone (hazard ratio [HR], 0.59; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.46-0.76). For symptomatic patients (n = 183), equivalent values were 14.1 versus 13.8 mo (HR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.54-1.13). At the final planned OS analysis, the median OS in asymptomatic/mildly symptomatic patients was not reached for olaparib + abiraterone versus 39.5 mo for placebo + abiraterone (HR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.59-1.00). For symptomatic patients, equivalent values were 22.9 versus 22.8 mo (HR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.58-1.16). Other outcomes showed no meaningful differences between the subgroups. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Olaparib + abiraterone provided efficacy benefits in 1L mCRPC patients with either asymptomatic/mildly symptomatic or symptomatic disease. A larger benefit occurred in asymptomatic/mildly symptomatic patients. PATIENT SUMMARY: PROpel, a phase 3 clinical trial, looked at whether combining olaparib with abiraterone delays the progression of patients' cancer compared with placebo plus abiraterone. Patients with or without pain symptoms associated with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer were eligible for enrolment into the trial. Results showed that olaparib plus abiraterone reduced the risk of disease progression and death, with a larger benefit observed in patients without or with mild pain symptoms than in those with pain symptoms.

Comparative Transcriptomes of Canine and Human Prostate Cancers Identify Mediators of Castration Resistance.

Prostate cancer continues to be one of the most lethal cancers in men. While androgen deprivation therapy is initially effective in treating prostate cancer, most cases of advanced prostate cancer eventually progress to castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC), which is incurable. Similarly, the most aggressive form of prostatic carcinoma occurs in dogs that have been castrated. To identify molecular similarities between canine prostate cancer and human CRPC, we performed a comparative analysis of gene expression profiles. Through this transcriptomic analysis, we found that prostatic carcinoma in castrated dogs demonstrates an androgen-indifferent phenotype, characterised by low-androgen receptor and neuroendocrine-associated genes. Notably, we identified two genes, ISG15 and AZGP1, that were consistently up- and down-regulated, respectively, in both canine prostatic carcinoma and human CRPC. Additionally, we identified several other genes, including GPX3, S100P and IFITM1, that exhibited similar expression patterns in both species. Protein-protein interaction network analysis demonstrated that these five genes were part of a larger network of interferon-induced genes, suggesting that they may act together in signalling pathways that are disrupted in prostate cancer. Accordingly, our findings suggest that the interferon pathway may play a role in the development and progression of CRPC in both dogs and humans and chart a new therapeutic approach.

Opposing impact of hypertension/diabetes following hormone therapy initiation and preexisting statins on castration resistant progression of nonmetastatic prostate cancer: a multicenter study.

Hormone therapy, especially androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), is effective against prostate cancer (PC), whereas long-term ADT is a risk for metabolic/cardiovascular disorders including diabetes (DM), hypertension (HT) and dyslipidemia (DL), and might result in progression to castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). We thus conducted a multicenter retrospective cohort study to ask whether CRPC progression would be associated positively with HT, DM or DL and negatively with statins prescribed for treatment of DL. In this study, 1,112 nonmetastatic PC patients undergoing ADT were enrolled. Univariate statistical analyses clearly showed significant association of HT or DM developing after ADT onset, though not preexisting HT or DM, with early CRPC progression. On the other hand, preexisting DL or statin use, but not newly developed DL or started statin prescriptions following ADT, was negatively associated with CRPC progression. Multivariate analysis revealed significant independent association of the newly developed DM or HT, or preexisting statin use with CRPC progression [adjusted hazard ratios (95% confidence intervals): 3.85 (1.65-8.98), p = 0.002; 2.75 (1.36-5.59), p = 0.005; 0.25 (0.09-0.72), p = 0.010, respectively]. Together, ADT-related development of HT or DM and preexisting statin use are considered to have positive and negative impact on CRPC progression, respectively.

NFYA-mediated promotion of castration-resistant prostate cancer progression through EGR4 regulation.

This research investigates the intricate involvement of nuclear Transcription Factor Y Subunit Alpha (NFYA) in the advancement of castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) and its consequential impact on early Growth Response 4 (EGR4) expression. NFYA demonstrates a significant elevation in CRPC tissues and cell lines, displaying robust upregulation in metastatic prostate cancer (mPCa) samples, closely associated with the Gleason score. Immunohistochemistry validates heightened nuclear staining of NFYA in CRPC patients, highlighting its crucial role in the progression of advanced prostate cancer. Silencing NFYA through siRNA in androgen-independent cell lines markedly impedes cell growth and migration, emphasizing NFYA's pivotal role in promoting CRPC behavior. RNA-seq analysis identifies EGR4 as a downstream target of NFYA, with both genes consistently upregulated in CRPC. Validating this finding, heightened expression of EGR4 is observed in CRPC samples. In vivo studies utilizing a mouse model demonstrate that NFYA silencing substantially inhibits LNCaP-AI/22RV1shNFYA xenograft tumor growth, accompanied by reduced expression of EGR4 and Ki67. This comprehensive study reveals the multifaceted role of NFYA in CRPC progression, elucidates its downstream impact on EGR4, and underscores the therapeutic potential of targeting NFYA to inhibit CRPC growth in vivo. These findings contribute valuable insights into potential therapeutic strategies for managing CRPC.

Effect of deep testosterone reduction on the prognosis of metastatic prostate cancer with high-volume disease.

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to investigate the correlation between serum testosterone levels after one month of treatment and prognosis in patients with high-volume disease metastatic prostate cancer (mPCa) who are undergoing combined androgen blockade therapy (CAB). METHODS: The clinical data of 199 patients with high-volume disease mPCa, diagnosed through biopsy pathology and imaging, were retrospectively analyzed from January 2010 to October 2022 in the Department of Urology at the First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University. Among these patients, 111 cases had a deep reduction in serum testosterone (< 0.7 nmol/l) after one month of treatment, while 88 cases did not achieve a deep reduction (≥ 0.7 nmol/l). The study utilized the Kaplan-Meier method to plot survival curves and employed the multifactor COX regression model to analyze independent risk factors. The risk factors with a significance level of P < 0.05 in the multivariate analysis were included in the nomogram prediction model. The accuracy of the model was assessed using the ROC curve and the calibration curve, while the net benefit for patients was evaluated through the decision curve analysis (DCA). RESULTS: The group that achieved deep testosterone reduction(DTR) had a higher proportion of PSA < 0.2 ng/ml and a greater PSA decline rate after six months of treatment (P < 0.05). The group that achieved DTR and the group that did not achieve DTR had a progression to castration resistant prostate cancer(CRPC) time of 17.93 ± 6.68 months and 13.43 ± 6.12 months, respectively (P < 0.001). The median progression-free survival time for the 2 groups were 18 months and 12 months, respectively (P < 0.001). The median overall survival times were 57 months and 32 months, respectively (P < 0.001). The median progression-free survival times were 18, 15, and 10 months for the group that achieved DTR within 1 month, the group that achieved DTR beyond 1 month but within 1 year, and the group that did not achieve DTR within 1 year, respectively (P < 0.001), and the median survival times were 57, 45, and 26 months, respectively (P < 0.001). COX multivariate analysis revealed that a testosterone level of ≥ 0.7 nmol/l at 1 month of treatment is an independent risk factor for the progression to CRPC and prognosis in patients with high-volume disease mPCa (P < 0.05). The risk of death in patients with a testosterone level of ≥ 0.7 nmol/l at 1 month of treatment was 2.087 times higher than that of patients with a level of < 0.7 nmol/l (P < 0.05). A nomogram prediction model was developed using independent risk factors, with the area under the ROC curve (AUC) for progression-free survival (PFS) at 12, 15, 18, and 21 months being 0.788, 0.772, 0.760, and 0.739, respectively. For 3 and 5 years, the AUCs for overall survival (OS) were 0.691 and 0.624. The calibration curve demonstrated good consistency between the model's predicted values and the actual outcomes. CONCLUSION: Patients with high-volume disease mPCa who receive CAB treatment may experience extended progression-free survival and overall survival if their serum testosterone levels are below 0.7 nmol/l after one month of treatment. The longer it takes to achieve DTR, the worse the patient's prognosis may be. The nomogram prediction model developed in this study demonstrates good predictive ability in assessing the progression and prognosis of high-volume disease mPCa.

Treatment-induced stemness and lineage plasticity in driving prostate cancer therapy resistance.

Most human cancers are heterogeneous consisting of cancer cells at different epigenetic and transcriptional states and with distinct phenotypes, functions, and drug sensitivities. This inherent cancer cell heterogeneity contributes to tumor resistance to clinical treatment, especially the molecularly targeted therapies such as tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and androgen receptor signaling inhibitors (ARSIs). Therapeutic interventions, in turn, induce lineage plasticity (also called lineage infidelity) in cancer cells that also drives therapy resistance. In this Perspective, we focus our discussions on cancer cell lineage plasticity manifested as treatment-induced switching of epithelial cancer cells to basal/stem-like, mesenchymal, and neural lineages. We employ prostate cancer (PCa) as the prime example to highlight ARSI-induced lineage plasticity during and towards development of castration-resistant PCa (CRPC). We further discuss how the tumor microenvironment (TME) influences therapy-induced lineage plasticity. Finally, we offer an updated summary on the regulators and mechanisms driving cancer cell lineage infidelity, which should be therapeutically targeted to extend the therapeutic window and improve patients' survival.

Combination of the PARPi and ARSi in advanced castration resistant prostate cancer: a review of the recent phase III trials.

Tumors with an impaired ability to repair DNA double-strand breaks by homologous recombination, including those with alterations in breast cancer 1 and 2 (BRCA1 and BRCA2) genes, are very sensitive to blocking DNA single-strand repair by inhibition of the poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) enzyme. This provides the basis for a synthetic deadly strategy in the treatment of different types of cancer, such as prostate cancer (PCa). The phase 3 PROfound study was the first to lead to olaparib approval in patients with metastatic castration resistant PCa (mCRPC) and BRCA genes mutations. In recent years, the benefit of combination therapy consisted of a PARP inhibitor (PARPi) plus an androgen receptor signalling inhibitor (ARSi), was evaluated as first-line treatment of mCRPC, regardless of the mutational state of genes, participating in the homologous recombination repair (HRR). This review explores the role of PARPi in PCa and analyses the data of latest clinical trials exploring the PARPi-ARSi combinations, and how these results could change our clinical practice.

N-terminal domain of androgen receptor is a major therapeutic barrier and potential pharmacological target for treating castration resistant prostate cancer: a comprehensive review.

The incidence rate of prostate cancer (PCa) has risen by 3% per year from 2014 through 2019 in the United States. An estimated 34,700 people will die from PCa in 2023, corresponding to 95 deaths per day. Castration resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) is the leading cause of deaths among men with PCa. Androgen receptor (AR) plays a critical role in the development of CRPC. N-terminal domain (NTD) is the essential functional domain for AR transcriptional activation, in which modular activation function-1 (AF-1) is important for gene regulation and protein interactions. Over last 2 decades drug discovery against NTD has attracted interest for CRPC treatment. However, NTD is an intrinsically disordered domain without stable three-dimensional structure, which has so far hampered the development of drugs targeting this highly dynamic structure. Employing high throughput cell-based assays, small-molecule NTD inhibitors exhibit a variety of unexpected properties, ranging from specific binding to NTD, blocking AR transactivation, and suppressing oncogenic proliferation, which prompts its evaluation in clinical trials. Furthermore, molecular dynamics simulations reveal that compounds can induce the formation of collapsed helical states. Nevertheless, our knowledge of NTD structure has been limited to the primary sequence of amino acid chain and a few secondary structure motif, acting as a barrier for computational and pharmaceutical analysis to decipher dynamic conformation and drug-target interaction. In this review, we provide an overview on the sequence-structure-function relationships of NTD, including the polymorphism of mono-amino acid repeats, functional elements for transcription regulation, and modeled tertiary structure of NTD. Moreover, we summarize the activities and therapeutic potential of current NTD-targeting inhibitors and outline different experimental methods contributing to screening novel compounds. Finally, we discuss current directions for structure-based drug design and potential breakthroughs for exploring pharmacological motifs and pockets in NTD, which could contribute to the discovery of new NTD inhibitors.

Best Patient Care Practices for Administering PSMA-Targeted Radiopharmaceutical Therapy.

Optimal patient management protocols for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) are poorly defined and even further complexified with new therapy approvals, such as radiopharmaceuticals. The prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-targeted agent 177Lu vipivotide tetraxetan ([177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617), approved after the phase III VISION study, presents physicians with additional aspects of patient management, including specific adverse event (AE) monitoring and management, as well as radiation safety. Drawing on our experience as VISION study investigators, here we provide guidance on best practices for delivering PSMA-targeted radiopharmaceutical therapy (RPT) to patients with mCRPC. After a comprehensive review of published evidence and guidelines on RPT management in prostate cancer, we identified educational gaps in managing the radiation safety and AEs associated with [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617. Our results showed that providing sufficient education on AEs (e.g., fatigue and dry mouth) and radiation safety principles is key to effective delivery and management of patient expectations. Patient counseling by health care professionals, across disciplines, is a cornerstone of optimal patient management during PSMA-targeted RPT. Multidisciplinary collaboration is crucial, and physicians must adhere to radiation safety protocols and counsel patients on radiation safety considerations. Treatment with [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 is generally well tolerated; however, additional interventions may be required, such as dosing modification, medications, or transfusions. Urinary incontinence can be challenging in the context of radiation safety. Multidisciplinary collaboration between medical oncologists and nuclear medicine teams ensures that patients are monitored and managed safely and efficiently. In clinical practice, the benefit-to-risk ratio should always be evaluated on a case-by-case basis.

Castration-resistant prostate cancer monitoring by cell-free circulating biomarkers.

Background: Prostate cancer is the second leading cause of male cancer-related deaths in Western countries, which is predominantly attributed to the metastatic castration-resistant stage of the disease (CRPC). There is an urgent need for better prognostic and predictive biomarkers, particularly for androgen receptor targeted agents and taxanes. Methods: We have searched the PubMed database for original articles and meta-analyses providing information on blood-based markers for castration-resistant prostate cancer monitoring, risk group stratification and prediction of therapy response. Results: The molecular markers are discussed along with the standard clinical parameters, such as prostate specific antigen, lactate dehydrogenase or C-reactive protein. Androgen receptor (AR) alterations are commonly associated with progression to CRPC. These include amplification of AR and its enhancer, point mutations and splice variants. Among DNA methylations, a novel 5-hydroxymethylcytosine activation marker of TOP2A and EZH2 has been identified for the aggressive disease. miR-375 is currently the most promising candidate among non-coding RNAs and sphingolipid analysis has recently emerged as a novel approach. Conclusions: The promising biomarkers have the potential to improve the care of metastatic prostate cancer patients, however, they need further validation for routine implementation.

Design, synthesis and biological evaluation of dual inhibitors targeting AR/AR-Vs and PARP1 in castration resistant prostate cancer therapy.

The combination of androgen signaling inhibitors and PARP inhibitors has shown promising results in clinical trials for the treatment of castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). Multi-target inhibitors can inhibit tumors through different pathways, addressing the limitations of traditional single target inhibitors. We designed and synthesized dual inhibitors targeting AR/AR-Vs and PARP1 using a pharmacophore hybridization strategy. The most potent compound, II-3, inhibits AR/AR-Vs signaling and induces DNA damage by inhibiting PARP1. The IC50 values of II-3 in the castration-resistant prostate cancer cell lines 22RV1 and C4-2 are 4.38 ± 0.56 µM, and 3.44 ± 0.63 µM, respectively. II-3 not only suppresses the proliferation and migration of 22RV1 and C4-2 cells, but also promotes their apoptosis. Intraperitoneal injection of II-3 effectively inhibits tumor growth in 22RV1 xenograft nude mice without evident drug-induced toxicity. Overall, a series of novel dual inhibitors targeting AR/AR-Vs and PARP1 were designed and synthesized, and meanwhile the in vivo and in vitro effects were comprehensively explored, which provided a potential new therapeutic strategy for CRPC.

Current uses and resistance mechanisms of enzalutamide in prostate cancer treatment.

INTRODUCTION: Prostate cancer continues to be a major cause of morbidity and mortality for men worldwide. Enzalutamide, a second-generation non-steroidal antiandrogen that blocks androgen receptor (AR) transcriptional activity, is a treatment for biochemically recurrent, metastatic, castration-sensitive, and castration-resistant tumors. Unfortunately, most patients ultimately develop resistance to enzalutamide, making long-term treatment with this agent challenging. AREAS COVERED: We performed a literature search of PubMed without date restrictions to investigate the literature surrounding enzalutamide and discuss the current uses of enzalutamide, proposed mechanisms driving resistance, and summarize current efforts to mitigate this resistance. EXPERT OPINION: Enzalutamide is an effective prostate cancer therapy that is currently used in biochemically recurrent and metastatic disease and for both castration-sensitive and castration-resistant tumors. Unfortunately, resistance to enzalutamide occurs in each of these scenarios. In the clinical setting, enzalutamide-resistant tumors are either AR-driven or AR-indifferent. AR-dependent resistance mechanisms include genomic or epigenomic events that result in enhanced AR signaling. Tumors that do not require AR signaling instead may depend on alternative oncogenic pathways. There are numerous strategies to mitigate enzalutamide resistance, including concurrent use of PARP inhibitors or immune therapies. Additional work is required to uncover novel approaches to treat patients in the enzalutamide-resistant setting.

Apalutamide for non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC): real world data of a multicenter study.

PURPOSE: Apalutamide plus androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) improved outcomes in patients with non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC). Nevertheless real-world data are limited. The aim of this multicenter study was to generate real-world data from nmCRPC patients treated with ADT plus apalutamide. METHODS: In this observational cohort based investigator initiated trial data of nmCRPC patients receiving apalutamide plus ADT were collected focusing on patient demographic data, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) declines, safety profile including dose modification/discontinuation as well as subsequent therapy and metastasis-free survival (MFS). RESULTS: Data from a total of 31 nmCRPC patients were documented. Compared to the Phase III study Spartan real-world patients are older, showed a higher ECOG-PS and more aggressive tumors. In the cohort PSA decreased about 98.1%, 74% of patients showed a PSA decrease over 90% and 54.8% reached a PSA-level < 0.2ng/ml. Apalutamide was well tolerated in real world patients: adverse events occurred in 67.7% but were in the majority mild (≥ grade 3: 6.5%). Dose reduction was necessary in 38.7% and 32.2% discontinued apalutamide treatment. MFS was 43 months and majority of patients were subsequently treated with abiraterone. CONCLUSION: In real world more comorbid nmCRPC patients with a higher ECOG-PS and more aggressive tumors are treated with apalutamide plus ADT. Nevertheless efficacy results as well as side effects are similar in real-world compared to Spartan trial showing also a rapid, durable and deep PSA response with a median MFS of 43 months.

Intensification Approaches and Treatment Sequencing in Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Recently, research on treatment intensification has gathered momentum, and three novel therapy combinations were approved for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). This systematic review summarizes the current and emerging evidence around intensified strategies for mCRPC and provides guidance for an ideal therapeutic sequencing. METHODS: Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P) guidelines were followed to perform this review. PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrials.gov, and major international societies' online proceedings were searched comprehensively until May 15, 2024, for terms related to treatment intensification and sequencing for mCRPC. KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS: Overall, 28 clinical trials and 24 ongoing studies of intensification treatments were included in this review. Algorithms of optimal sequencing of approved treatments for mCRPC were outlined according to the use of androgen receptor pathway inhibitors (ARPIs) with or without docetaxel for earlier disease states. In first line, poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor + ARPI combinations improve radiographical progression-free survival (rPFS), particularly for those with BRCA1/2 alterations. The AKT inhibitor combination of ipatasertib + abiraterone extends rPFS in those with PTEN loss or PIK3CA/AKT1/PTEN alterations. In those with two or more risk factors for early progression on enzalutamide, radionuclide 177-Lu-PSMA-617 + enzalutamide prolongs progression-free survival. Ongoing research of intensified approaches for mCRPC, and available and potential predictive and prognostic biomarkers are discussed. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Recent approvals and ongoing investigations of single agents and intensification approaches will keep transforming the mCRPC treatment landscape. Improvement of patient profiling applying recognized genomic, molecular, and clinical predictive and prognostic indicators is fundamental to optimize sequential use of available therapies.

Prostate Cancer's Silent Partners: Fibroblasts and Their Influence on Glutamine Metabolism Manipulation.

Cancer-associated fibroblast (CAF)s in the tumour microenvironment (TME) modulate the extracellular matrix, interact with cancer cells, and facilitate communication with infiltrating leukocytes, significantly contributing to cancer progression and therapeutic response. In prostate cancer (PCa), CAFs promote malignancy through metabolic rewiring, cancer stem cell regulation, and therapy resistance. Pre-clinical studies indicate that targeting amino acid metabolism, particularly glutamine (Gln) metabolism, reduces cancer proliferation and stemness. However, most studies lack the context of CAF-cancer interaction, focusing on monocultures. This study assesses the influence of CAFs on PCa growth by manipulating Gln metabolism using colour-labelled PCa cell lines (red) and fibroblast (green) in a co-culture system to evaluate CAFs' effects on PCa cell proliferation and clonogenic potential. CAFs increased the proliferation of hormone-sensitive LNCaP cells, whereas the castration-resistant C4-2 cells were unaffected. However, clonogenic growth increased in both cell lines. Gln deprivation and GLS1 inhibition experiments revealed that the increased growth rate of LNCAP cells was associated with increased dependence on Gln, which was confirmed by proteomic analyses. Tissue analysis of PCa patients revealed elevated GLS1 levels in both the PCa epithelium and stroma, suggesting that GLS1 is a therapeutic target. Moreover, the median overall survival analysis of GLS1 expression in the PCa epithelium and stroma identified a "high-risk" patient group that may benefit from GLS1-targeted therapies. Therefore, GLS1 targeting appears promising in castration-resistant PCa patients with high GLS1 epithelium and low GLS1 stromal expression.

The Circulating miR-107 as a Potential Biomarker Up-Regulated in Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer.

Prostate cancer (PCa) is a prevalent malignancy in men globally. Current diagnostic methods like PSA testing have limitations, leading to overdiagnosis and unnecessary treatment. Castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) emerges in some patients receiving androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). This study explores the potential of circulating microRNA-107 (miR-107) in liquid biopsies as a prognosis tool to differentiate CRPC from non-castration-resistant PCa (NCRPC). We designed a case-control study to evaluate circulating miR-107 in serum as a potential prognosis biomarker. We analyzed miR-107 expression in liquid biopsies and found significantly higher levels (p < 0.005) in CRPC patients, compared to NCRPC. Notably, miR-107 expression was statistically higher in the advanced stage (clinical stage IV), compared to stages I-III. Furthermore, CRPC patients exhibited significantly higher miR-107 levels (p < 0.05), compared to NCRPC. These findings suggest that miR-107 holds promise as a non-invasive diagnostic biomarker for identifying potential CRPC patients.

Patient-reported Outcomes for Patients with Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer and BRCA1/2 Gene Alterations: Final Analysis from the Randomized Phase 3 MAGNITUDE Trial.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The phase 3 MAGNITUDE trial assessed the efficacy and safety of niraparib 200 mg and abiraterone acetate 1000 mg plus prednisone 10 mg (AAP) in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) and alterations in homologous recombination repair (HRR) genes. Here we report final analysis results for patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in the HRR+ cohort with a focus on BRCA1/2 alterations (BRCA+). METHODS: Protocol-specified endpoints evaluated patient-reported symptoms, health-related quality of life (HRQoL), and tolerability (side-effect bother) using the Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-SF), Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate (FACT-P), and EQ-5D-5L questionnaires. Evaluations were completed on day 1 of designated treatment cycles and during follow-up. KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS: All patients with BRCA+ mCRPC (n = 225) were included in the PRO analyses with average on-treatment PRO compliance >80% when completed on-site. Time to deterioration in pain according to BPI-SF and FACT-P scores did not significantly differ between niraparib + AAP and placebo + AAP. During treatment, EQ-5D-5L revealed no clinically meaningful differences in overall HRQoL between treatment arms in the BRCA+ subgroup. Finally, tolerability was similar between arms; side effect bother rated as "not at all" or "a little bit" ranged from 79.8% to 95.9% during treatment. Limitations include a sample size that may not have been powered to detect a difference in PROs. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Treatment with niraparib + AAP maintained HRQoL with minimal side-effect bother reported by most patients with BRCA+ mCRPC. Differences between treatment groups in time to pain deterioration did not meet conventional levels of statistical significance. The MAGNITUDE trial is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov as NCT03748641.

The prognostic role of pan-immune inflammation value in patients with metastatic castration resistance prostate cancer treated with Lutetium-177 (177Lu)-PSMA-617.

BACKGROUND: Pan-immune inflammation value (PIV) is a newly defined biomarker that includes whole cellular components that are indicators of systemic inflammation in complete blood count (CBC), easily accessible and has the potential to reflect both the body's immune response and systemic inflammation status. This study evaluated the pretreatment PIV for its prognostic impact on overall survival (OS) in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) treated with Lutetium-177 (177Lu)-PSMA-617. METHODS: The PIV was based on the earliest CBC obtained within 1 month before treatment initiation. Patients were categorized into low and high PIV groups based on the median pretreatment PIV, and the relationship between OS and PIV groups was assessed by multivariable analysis. RESULTS: A total of 43 patients with mCRPC treated with (177Lu)-PSMA-617 were included. The median OS was longer in the low PIV group (15.1 months [95% confidence interval [CI] 10.6-19.5]) than in the high PIV group (4.2 months [95% CI 1.7-6.6]) (p < 0.001). In multivariable analysis, high PIV (hazard ratio [HR]: 4.3, 95% CI 1.194-15.93, p = 0.026) and high Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance score (HR: 7.05, 95% CI 1.48-33.46, p = 0.014) were associated with shorter OS. CONCLUSION: This study showed that pretreatment PIV might be a prognostic factor in patients with mCRPC treated with (177Lu)-PSMA-617.

Recommendations from the Galician Oncological Society and the Galician Society of Nuclear Medicine for the use of 177Lu-PSMA-617 radioligand-therapy in prostate cancer.

Theragnostic is a type of precision medicine that uses molecules linked to radioactive isotopes for the diagnosis and treatment of diseases. In recent years, it has gained significant importance to treat neuroendocrine tumors and is currently being used in prostate cancer. Various radiopharmaceuticals have emerged for diagnosing and detecting lesions showing prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positivity on the Positron emission tomography/computed tomography scan, being the most widely used labeled with [68Ga] and [18F]. Its use as therapy in prostate cancer (PC) has been assessed in the VISION, TheraP, and PSMAfore clinical trials conducted with the radioligand [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617, demonstrating significant antitumor activity. The aim of this article is to present practical recommendations, based on current available scientific evidence and on a multidisciplinary consensus, for the diagnosis and treatment with [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 in patients with PC.

Combination therapies with Wnt signaling inhibition: A better choice for prostate cancer treatment.

The intractability and high mortality rate of castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) remain the most challenging problems in the field of prostate cancer (PCa). Emerging evidence has shown that the dysregulation of Wnt signaling pathways, which are highly conserved cascades that regulate embryonic development and maintain tissue homeostasis, is involved in various stages of PCa occurrence and progression. In this review, we systemically discuss the mechanisms by which the androgen receptor (AR) signaling pathway and Wnt signaling pathways participate in the occurrence of PCa and its progression to CRPC. Specifically, we elaborate on how Wnt signaling pathways induce the malignant transformation of prostate cells, promote the malignant progression of PCa and establish an immunosuppressive prostate tumor microenvironment through interaction with the AR pathway or in an AR-independent manner. We also discuss how Wnt signaling pathways enhances the stemness characteristics of prostate cancer stem cells (PCSCs) to induce the occurrence and metastasis of CPPC. Additionally, we discuss the latest progress in the use of different types of drugs that inhibit the Wnt signaling pathways in the treatment of PCa. We believe that the combination of Wnt signaling-based drugs with endocrine and other therapies is necessary and may enhance the clinical efficacy in the treatment of all types of PCa.