The Preoperative Factors for the Undercorrection of Myopia in an Extend Depth-of-Focus Intraocular Lens: A Case-Control Study.

We aim to investigate the potential risk factors for undercorrection in those who have received extend depth-of-focus (EDOF) intraocular lens (IOL) implantation. A retrospective case-control study was conducted in which patients who had received one type of EDOF IOL implantation were included. The patients were divided into the residual group and non-residual group according to the final postoperative sphere power. The preoperative data include the refractive, topographic, endothelial, and biometric parameters obtained. A generalized linear model was generated to yield the adjusted odds ratio (aOR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) of each parameter of the residual myopia. One month postoperatively, the UDVA was better in the non-residual group than in the residual group (p = 0.010), and the final SE was significantly higher in the residual group than in the non-residual group (p < 0.001). In the multivariable analysis, the high preoperative cycloplegia sphere power, higher TCRP, higher corneal cylinder power, and longer AXL significantly correlated to the presence of postoperative residual myopia (all p < 0.05). Furthermore, the higher preoperative cycloplegia sphere power, higher TCRP, higher corneal cylinder power, longer AXL, larger ACD, and larger WTW were significantly associated with postoperative residual myopia in the high-myopia population (all p < 0.001), while the higher preoperative cycloplegia sphere power, higher TCRP, and longer AXL were related to postoperative residual myopia in the low-myopia population (all p < 0.05). In conclusion, high preoperative myopia and corneal refractive power correlate to high risk of residual myopia after EDOF IOL implantation, especially in the high-myopia population.

Influence of back optic zone diameter on corneal morphology with orthokeratology lenses.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare the changes in corneal morphological characteristics in corneal topography assessments performed after wearing orthokeratology (OK) lenses with different back optic zone diameters (BOZDs). These changes included the change ratios of the apical corneal power (ACP), the maximum relative corneal refractive power (mRCRP), and the treatment zone diameter (TZD). METHODS: Data from 133 children with myopia (average age 9.50 ± 1.23 years) treated at Fudan University Eye and Ear, Nose, and Throat Hospital were retrospectively analyzed. All participants wore the same brand of tangent-design OK lens (corneal refractive therapy, CRT). According to the BOZD, the patients were divided into two groups, of 5.0 and 6.0 mm BOZD, respectively. Corneal topography was analyzed at baseline, as well as 1 day, 1 week, and 1 month after wearing the lenses, and the change ratios of ACP, mRCRP, and TZD were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: The change ratio of the ACP did not differ significantly between the BOZD 5.0 and 6.0 groups after 1 day or 1 week of lens wear (P = 0.170 and P = 0.113, respectively). However, after 1 month of lens wear, the change ratio of the ACP in the BOZD 5.0 group was significantly larger than that in the BOZD 6.0 group (P < 0.001). After 1 month of lens wear, the mRCRP along the horizontal and vertical meridians was higher (P < 0.05) and the TZD was significantly smaller (P < 0.001) in the BOZD 5.0 group than in the BOZD 6.0 group. CONCLUSION: In CRT OK lenses, a small BOZD lens can produce faster corneal shaping, a larger mRCRP, and a smaller TZD, which may have a better effect on slowing ocular axial length elongation. The lens parameters are also a factor affecting the TZD.

Relative corneal refractive power shift and inter-eye differential axial growth in children with myopic anisometropia treated with bilateral orthokeratology.

PURPOSE: To investigate the relationship between relative corneal refractive power shift (RCRPS) and axial length growth (ALG) in bilateral myopic anisometropes treated with orthokeratology. METHODS: A total of 102 children with myopic anisometropia in this prospective interventional study were randomly assigned to the spectacle group and orthokeratology group. Axial length (AL) and corneal topography was measured at baseline and the 12-month follow-up visit. ALG was defined as the difference between the two measurements, and RCRPS profiles were calculated from two axial maps obtained. RESULTS: In the orthokeratology group, the ALG in the more myopic eye (0.06 ± 0.15 mm) was significantly smaller than that in the less myopic eye (0.15 ± 0.15 mm, p < 0.001), and the interocular difference in AL significantly decreased following 1-year treatment, from 0.47 ± 0.32 to 0.38 ± 0.28 mm (p < 0.001). However, in the spectacle group, the ALG was similar between the two eyes, and the interocular difference in AL did not change significantly over one year (all p > 0.05). The interocular difference in ALG in the orthokeratology group was significantly correlated with the interocular difference in RCRPS (dRCRPS, ß=-0.003, p < 0.001) and the interocular difference in baseline AL (ß=-0.1179, p < 0.001), with R2 being 0.6197. CONCLUSION: Orthokeratology was effective in decreasing the magnitude of anisometropia. The interocular variation in RCRPS is an important factor accounting for the reduction of interocular ALG difference in anisomyopic children post-orthokeratology. These results provide insight into establishing eye-specific myopia control guidelines during orthokeratology treatment for myopic anisometropes.

Associations between axial length, corneal refractive power and lens thickness in children and adolescents: The Ural Children Eye Study.

PURPOSE: To assess relationships between ocular biometric parameters in dependence of age and sex in children and adolescents. METHODS: In the Ural Children Eye Study, a school-based cohort study, 4933 children underwent an ophthalmological and general examination. RESULTS: Complete biometric measurements were available for 4406 (89.3%) children. Cycloplegic refractive error (mean: -0.87 ± 1.73 diopters (D); median: -0.38 D; range: -19.75 D to +11.25 D) increased (multivariable analysis; r2 = 0.73) with shorter axial length (ß: -0.99; non-standardized regression coefficient B: -1.64; 95% CI: -1.68, -1.59) and lower corneal refractive power (ß: -0.55; B: -0.67; 95% CI: -0.70, -0.64), in addition to higher cylindrical refractive error (ß: 0.10; B: 0.34; 95% CI: 0.27, 0.41), thinner lens (ß: -0.11; -0.85; 95% CI: -1.02, -0.69) and male sex (ß: 0.15; B: 0.50; 95% CI: 0.42, 0.57). In univariate analysis, decrease in refractive error with older age was more significant (ß: -0.38 vs. ß: -0.25) and steeper (B: -0.22 (95% CI: -0.24, -0.20) vs. B: -0.13 (95% CI: -0.15, -0.11)) in girls than boys, particularly for an age of 11+ years. Axial length increased with older age (steeper for age <11 years) (B: 0.22 (95% CI: 0.18, 0.25) vs. 0.07 (95% CI: 0.05, 0.09)). In multivariable analysis, axial length increased with lower refractive error (ß: -0.77; B: -0.42; 95% CI: -0.43, -0.40) and lower corneal refractive power (ß: -0.54; B: -0.39; 95% CI: -0.41, -0.38), in addition to older age (ß: 0.04; B: 0.02; 95% CI: 0.01, 0.03), male sex (ß: 0.13; B: 0.23; 95% CI: 0.21, 0.32), higher cylindrical refractive error (ß: 0.05; B: 0.09; 95% CI: 0.05, 0.14) and thinner lens (ß: -0.14; B: -0.62; 95% CI: -0.72, -0.51). The axial length/corneal curvature (AL/CR) ratio increased until the age of 14 years (ß: 0.34; B: 0.017; 95% CI: 0.016, 0.019; p < 0001), and then became independent of age. The AL/CR ratio increased (r2 = 0.78) mostly with higher corneal refractive power (ß: 0.25; B: 0.02; 95% CI: 0.02, 0.02; p < 0.001), lower refractive error (ß: -0.75; B: -0.05; 95% CI: -0.05, -0.05; p < 0.001), thinner lens thickness (ß: -01.6; B: -0.09; 95% CI: -0.10, -0.08; p < 0.001) and older age (ß: 0.16; B: 0.006; 95% CI: 0.005, 0.007; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In this multiethnic group of school children in Russia, the age-related increase in myopic refractive error was more significant and steeper in girls, particularly for the age group of 11+ years. Determinants of higher myopic refractive error were longer axial length, higher corneal refractive power, lower cylindrical refractive error, thicker lens and female sex.

Comparison of corneal refractive power and visual quality after LASEK, TransPRK or FS-LASIK / 国际眼科杂志(Guoji Yanke Zazhi)

AIM:To compare the corneal refractive power and visual quality after three kinds of corneal refractive surgery: laser subepithelial keratomileusis(LASEK), transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy(TransPRK)and femtosecond laser assisted in situ keratomileusis(FS-LASIK).METHODS: Retrospective study. A total of 232 patients(464 eyes)who underwent elective corneal refractive surgery in our hospital from January 2021 to December 2022 were selected as the study subjects. They were divided into the LASEK group of 70 cases(140 eyes), TransPRK group of 76 cases(152 eyes), and FS-LASIK group of 86 cases(172 eyes)according to the different surgical choices made by the patients. Uncorrected visual acuity(UCVA), visual quality, biomechanical stability, tear film break-up time(BUT), Schirmer Ⅰ test(SⅠt)and quality of life were compared among the three groups at 1 and 3 mo postoperatively.RESULTS: The UCVA of the three groups significantly improved at 1 and 3 mo postoperatively, the total high-order aberrations, spherical aberration, horizontal coma, and vertical coma of the entire cornea were significantly increased, while the biomechanical stability in all three groups were significantly reduced(all P&#x003C;0.05). At 3 mo postoperatively, the biomechanical stability in the TransPRK and LASEK groups were higher than those of the FS-LASIK group(all P&#x003C;0.05), and the TransPRK group had higher quality of life scores than the LASEK group and FS-LASIK group(P&#x003C;0.05). Furthermore, there was no significant difference in preoperative or postoperative BUT and SⅠt among the three groups(all P&#x003E;0.05).CONCLUSION:In the treatment of ametropia, LASEK, TransPRK and FS-LASIK all have certain effects, and have similar results in improving UCVA and increasing visual quality. However, TransPRK and LASEK have more stable biomechanical properties than FS-LASIK, and have better efficacy in improving patients' quality of life.

The correlation between modifications to corneal topography and changes in retinal vascular density and retinal thickness in myopic children after undergoing orthokeratology.

Purpose: This study aimed to investigate the relationship among changes in corneal topography, retinal vascular density, and retinal thickness in myopic children who underwent orthokeratology for 3 months. Method: Thirty children with myopia wore orthokeratology lenses for 3 months. Using optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA), the retina was imaged as 6 × 6 mm en-face images at baseline and 3 months after orthokeratology. Cornea data was acquired by topography and analyzed by customer MATLAB software. The cornea was divided into 3 zones and 9 sectors. The relative corneal refractive power shift (RCRPS) was used in this study. Changes in retinal vascular density (RVDC) and retinal thickness change (RTC) were associated with RCRPS by using spearman test. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. Result: A significant correlation was observed between the RVDC and the RCRPS in many regions (the r was 0.375 ~ 0.548, all p value <0.05). Significant positive correlations were found between RVDC in inner and outer temple regions with RCRPS at inner and outer nasal sectors. There were no significant correlations between RTC and RCRPS in other sectors except in the central cornea and the outer nasal retina (r:0.501, p:0.006). At baseline and 3 months after wearing the orthokeratology lens, no significant differences in the retinal microvasculature or thickness (p > 0.05) were observed at any regions. Conclusion: The correlation between the cornea and the retina was observed after orthokeratology. Cornea changes may affect regional retinal responses accordingly，which may explain how orthokeratology delays myopia progression partially.

Comparison of Corneal Power Difference Maps with Achieved Myopic Correction Using Scheimpflug Tomography After LASIK, PRK, and SMILE.

Purpose: To compare corneal power difference maps (∆maps) obtained from the Pentacam in patients with 1 year follow-up after LASIK, PRK, and SMILE with further stratification to low, moderate, and high myopia. Patients and methods: This retrospective study was comprised of patients who had preoperative and 1-year postoperative power maps that were obtained-front sagittal (SagF), refractive power (RP), true net power (TNP), and total corneal refractive power (TCRP)-for evaluation. Measurements were recorded and compared at the 4mm, 5mm and 6mm pupil and apex zones. Comparisons were made between each specific power ∆map and the surgically induced refractive change (SIRC). Further analysis of the ∆maps was performed based on degree of myopia (high, moderate, and low). Correlation and agreement were also assessed with regression and limits of agreement (LoA). Results: There were 172 eyes in the LASIK group, 187 eyes in the PRK group, and 46 eyes in the SMILE group. In the LASIK group, TNP ∆map at 5mm pupil zone had the least absolute mean difference with SIRC (0.007 ± 0.42D). In the PRK group, TNP ∆map at 5mm apex zone was most accurate compared to SIRC (0.066 ± 0.45D). In the SMILE group, TCRP ∆map at 4mm apex zone had the closest absolute value when compared to SIRC (0.011 ± 0.50D). There was good correlation and agreement for all three surgery groups, LASIK: r = 0.975, LoA -0.83D to +0.83D, PRK: r = 0.96, LoA -0.83D and +0.95D, and SMILE: r = 0.922, LoA -0.97 D to +0.99D. Conclusion: TNP ∆maps most accurately measured corneal power in the LASIK and PRK groups while TCRP ∆maps were most accurate in the SMILE group. The degree of myopia may change which ∆map is most accurate.

The effects of programmed optical zones on achieved corneal refractive power with myopic astigmatism after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE): a vector analysis.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effects of different programmed optical zones (POZs) on achieved corneal refractive power (CRP) with myopic astigmatism after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE). METHODS: In total, 113 patients (113 eyes) were included in this retrospective study. The eyes were divided into two groups according to POZ: group A (6.5, 6.6, and 6.7 mm, n = 59) and group B (6.8, 6.9, and 7.0 mm, n = 54). Fourier vector analysis was applied to evaluate the error values between the attempted and achieved corneal refractive power (CRP). Alpins vector analysis was used to calculate surgically induced astigmatism (SIA), difference vector (DV), magnitude of error (ME), and astigmatism correction index (ACI). Multivariate regression analysis was performed to assess potential factors associated with the error values. RESULTS: The error values in the group with large POZ were closer to zero, and significantly associated with the POZ at 2 and 4 mm of the cornea (ß = - 0.50, 95% confidence interval [CI] [- 0.80, - 0.20]; ß = - 0.37, 95% CI [- 0.63, - 0.10], P < 0.05, respectively). For the correction of astigmatism, the values of SIA, ME, and ACI were lower in group B than in group A (P < 0.05). The fitting curves between TIA and SIA were y = 0.83x + 0.19 (R2 = 0.84) and y = 1.05x + 0.04 (R2 = 0.90), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Smaller POZs resulted in higher error values between the achieved- and attempted-CRP in the SMILE procedure, which should be considered when performing surgery.

An evaluation of the accuracy of toric intraocular lens power calculation based on measured total corneal refractive power.

Purpose: To evaluate a method using measured values of total corneal refractive power (TCRP) for a manufacturer's online calculator by comparing it with the Barrett toric calculator (BTC) and Kane toric calculator (KTC) combined with simulated keratometry values (SimK). Methods: This was a retrospective case series. Patient records were reviewed to identify the patients who had biometry with the IOL Master 700 and Pentacam recorded before toric IOL implantation and refractive follow-up data after implantation. The predicted error in residual astigmatism was calculated by vector analysis according to the calculation methods and the measurements used. Results: A total of 70 eyes of 56 patients were included. The mean absolute astigmatism prediction errors were 0.6 ± 0.32, 0.59 ± 0.35, and 0.61 ± 0.35 D for the ATCTCRP, BTCSimK, and KTCSimK calculators, respectively (P = 0.934), and the centroid of the prediction errors were 0.3 D @ 178°, 0.11 D @ 102°, and 0.09 D @ 147°, respectively (P = 0.23). In the with-the-rule subgroup, the centroid of the prediction error was 0.34 D @ 176° for ATCTCRP and was the highest among the three calculation methods (P = 0.046). Conclusion: The ATCTCRP, BTCSimK, and KTCSimK calculators had similar performance with regards to their astigmatism prediction accuracy. The ATCTCRP calculator combined with 4.0-mm apex/ring readings of TCRP was slightly intended to result in against-the-rule residual astigmatism.

The effects of base curve aspheric orthokeratology lenses on corneal topography and peripheral refraction: A randomized prospective trial.

BACKGROUND: To investigate the effects of orthokeratology (ortho-k) lenses with aspheric and spherical base curve designs on corneal refractive power (CRP) and peripheral refraction. METHODS: Children aged 8 to 12 years with myopia between -0.75 D to -4.00 D, astigmatism ≤1.00 D, and corneal astigmatism ≤1.50 D were randomly assigned to the base curve aspheric (BCA) and base curve spherical (BCS) ortho-k lens groups. CRP was assessed for the central 8 mm cornea along horizontal and vertical meridians, and peripheral refraction was measured at 10°, 20°, and 30° along the nasal and temporal retina. Primary measurements included relative corneal refractive power change (RCRPC) and relative peripheral refraction change (RPRC). RESULTS: The 3-month results of the 33 and 29 subjects (right eye only) in the BCA and BCS groups, respectively, were obtained. Nonsignificant differences were found in the baseline data between the two groups (p > 0.05). At the 3-month follow-up visit, the mean RCRPC in the BCA group (2.08 ± 0.65 D) was significantly greater than that in the BCS group (1.32 ± 0.81 D) (F1,51 = 25.25, p < 0.001). The BCA group (-1.82 ± 0.65 D) exhibited a larger absolute RPRC than the BCS group (-0.98 ± 0.54 D) (F1,57 = 33.73, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: It was found that the BCA ortho-k lens resulted in a more aspheric treatment zone and a more myopic relative peripheral refraction (RPR) along the horizontal meridian. The more myopic RPR was contributed by a more hyperopic central refraction and a more myopic peripheral refraction in the BCA group.

Intraocular lens constant optimization in toric intraocular lens calculation using keratometry and total corneal power.

PURPOSE: To evaluate intraocular lens (IOL) constant optimization in toric IOL calculation with keratometry (K) and total corneal refractive power (TCRP). METHODS: Predicted spherical equivalent (SE) and residual astigmatism (RA) with K and TCRP were retrospectively calculated using the Haigis, Holladay 1, and SRK/T formulae and optimized IOL constants. The results of the Barrett calculator and the Abulafia-Koch formula with K were also calculated. The median absolute error in SE (MedAE-SE), mean absolute error in RA (MAE-RA), and centroid error (CE) were analyzed. RESULTS: Seventy-nine eyes of 71 patients implanted with toric IOLs were included. With K, there were no significant differences between the results before and after constant optimization using all the formulae. With TCRP, constant optimization significantly reduced MedAE-SE; however, significantly increased MAE-RA and CE using the Holladay 1 and SRK/T formulae. MedAE-SE, MAE-RA, and CE using the Haigis formula did not show significant differences. The difference in the predicted RA before and after constant optimization increased with IOL toricity. The MedAE-SE predicted by TCRP was significantly higher than that predicted by K despite constant optimization. The MAE-RA and CE predicted by TCRP were significantly lower than those predicted by K without posterior corneal astigmatism optimization; however, were not significantly different from those predicted by the Barrett and Abulafia-Koch formulae. CONCLUSIONS: Constant optimization is recommended when using the TCRP in toric IOL calculations, particularly for patients with large astigmatism. However, TCRP did not yield more accurate results than optimized K in toric IOL calculations despite constant optimization.

The effect of back optic zone diameter on relative corneal refractive power distribution and corneal higher-order aberrations in orthokeratology.

PURPOSE: To compare axial elongation, relative corneal refractive power (RCRP) distribution within the pupillary diameter, and corneal higher-order aberrations (HOAs) in myopic children wearing orthokeratology (ortho-k) lenses with different back optic zone diameters (BOZD). METHODS: Children aged 8-11 years were fitted with 5.0 or 6.2 mm-BOZD ortho-k lenses (groups A and B, respectively). Axial length (AL) and corneal topography were measured at baseline and during the annual visit. RCRP and corneal HOAs were compared between the two groups after one-year treatment. Multivariate linear regression analysis was performed to determine the association between AL elongation and RCRP parameters, corneal HOAs, and other variables between the groups. RESULTS: After one-year treatment, axial elongation was slower in group A than in group B, with a difference of 0.15 mm. Children in group A showed smaller treatment zone size, smaller 3/4X value (describing the distance from the apex RCRP profile rising to its three-quarter-peak level), greater RCRP sum value within the pupillary area, and higher increases in corneal total HOAs and horizontal coma (Z31). AL elongation was significantly correlated with baseline age, baseline spherical equivalent refraction (SER), treatment zone size, and 3/4X value. CONCLUSIONS: Ortho-k lenses designed with smaller BOZD increased myopia control efficacy, induced a steeper distribution of the RCRP profile within the pupillary diameter, and induced greater increases in corneal total HOAs and horizontal coma (Z31). Lens-induced RCRP profile within pupillary diameter, rising to its three-quarter-peak level at a smaller distance, may show a better myopia control effect.

The effect of corneal power distribution on axial elongation in children using three different orthokeratology lens designs.

PURPOSE: To investigate the correlation between spatial corneal power distribution and one-year axial length (AL) elongation using three ortho-k lens designs by a unified mathematical method. METHODS: A total of 137 subjects were included: 42 with Euclid lenses, 28 with DRL lenses, and 67 with CRT lenses. AL elongation, Xmax, Ymax and power exponent were compared among the three groups. One-year relative corneal refractive power change (RCRPC) was calculated by a polynomial function and a monomial function. Factors including age, baseline spherical equivalent refractive error (SER), Xmax, Ymax and power exponent was tested against one-year AL growth in a stepwise multiple linear regression model. RESULTS: The power exponent (F = 7.29, P = 0.0012) and Xmax (F = 62.88, P < 0.0001) of the DRL group was significantly smaller than that of the other two lens groups. Ymax was not significantly different among three lens groups (F = 1.18, P = 0.31). The one-year AL elongation of the DRL group (0.09 ± 0.14 mm) was significantly slower than that of the Euclid group (0.26 ± 0.14 mm, P = 0.002) and CRT group (0.32 ± 0.18 mm, P < 0.0001). AL elongation was significantly correlated with Xmax (standardized ß = 0.196, P = 0.003), power exponent (standardized ß = 0.644, P < 0.001), and age (standardized ß = -0.263, P < 0.001), with R2 being 0.608. CONCLUSION: A smaller and more aspheric treatment zone may be beneficial for reducing axial elongation in children undergoing ortho-k treatment, regardless of their baseline myopic refractive error.

Difference and consistency of corneal refractive power and astigmatism in cataract patients measured by CASIA2 and IOL Master 700 / 国际眼科杂志(Guoji Yanke Zazhi)

AIM: To compare the difference and consistency of corneal refractive power and astigmatism measured by CASIA2 and IOL Master 700 in patients with age-related cataract.METHODS: Retrospective study. A total of 153 patients(232 eyes)with age-related cataract admitted to Daping hospital from November to December 2021 were selected. The flat keratometry(Kf), steep keratometry(Ks), mean keratometry(Km), degree and axis of astigmatism(vector representation J0 and J45)of the anterior, posterior surfaces together with the total cornea from cataract patients were measured by CASIA2 and IOL Master 700, respectively. The difference, correlation and consistency of the two instruments were analyzed.RESULTS:There was no significant difference in J45 values of posterior corneal surface measured by CASIA2 and IOL Master 700(-0.006±0.038D vs. -0.005±0.044D, P&#x003E;0.05), but there were significant differences in other parameters(all P&#x003C;0.05). All parameters measured by the two instruments were significantly positive correlated(all r/rs&#x003E;0.7, P&#x003C;0.001); Bland-Altman analysis showed that the refractive power and astigmatism of the anterior cornea surface measured by the two facilities were in good consistency, while the refractive power of the posterior surface and the whole cornea showed poor consistency.CONCLUSION: CASIA2 and IOL Master 700 showed little differences and good consistency in the refractive power and astigmatism of the anterior, posterior and total corneal surface in cataract patients, which seems interchangeable. However, the refractive power of the posterior surface and the whole cornea has significant differences and poor consistency, which should not be interchange casually.

A novel analysis of Scheimpflug total corneal refractive power following corneal cross-linking in mild to moderate keratoconus.

AIM: To detect an earlier improvement in mild to moderate keratoconus following corneal cross-linking (CXL) with total corneal refractive power (TCRP) using ray tracing method. METHODS: A total of 40 eyes of 30 consecutive patients who underwent CXL for progressive keratoconus were retrospectively enrolled. The following keratometric parameters provided by Pentacam HR, including maximum keratometry (Kmax), steepest keratometry (Ksteep), 3 mm zonal TCRP centered over corneal apex (TCRPapex,zone 3 mm), zonal mean keratometry and TCRP centered over corneal cone (Kmcone,zone and TCRPcone,zone 1, 2, 3 mm) were evaluated preoperatively and 1, 3, 6, and 12mo postoperatively. Groups 1 and 2 were defined based on Kmax at postoperative 1mo as improved (the initial improvement group) or worsen (the initial deterioration group) compared to the preoperative level. RESULTS: In the overall group, only keratometric parameters based on ray tracing method displayed significant improvement early at 3mo postoperatively, in which TCRPcone,zone 1 mm and 2 mm exhibited the largest flattening (0.57 D and 0.53 D, respectively). In Group 1, only Kmax, Kmcone,zone 2 mm and TCRPcone,zone 2 mm showed significant improvement initially at 1mo postoperatively, in which Kmax exhibited the largest improvement (1.05 D), followed by TCRPcone,zone 2 mm (0.82 D). In Group 2, only keratometric parameters based on ray tracing method and Kmcone,zone 3 mm showed slight but not significant improvement early at 3mo, in which TCRPcone,zone 3 mm displayed the most improvement (0.19 D), followed by TCRPcone,zone 2 mm (0.15 D). CONCLUSION: The findings indicate that a 2 mm zonal TCRP centered over Kmax could earlier detect keratometric improvement by CXL compared to other commonly used parameters in mild to moderate keratoconic eyes.

The treatment zone decentration and corneal refractive profile changes in children undergoing orthokeratology treatment.

BACKGROUND: To confirm the association between treatment-zone (TZ) decentration and axial length growth (ALG) in children who underwent orthokeratology; and to explore the association between TZ decentration and relative corneal refractive power (RCRP) profile, which was known to be significantly associated with ALG retardation. METHODS: Four hundred myopic children of age 12 years participated in the study, with 200 wearing orthokeratology lenses and the other 200 wearing single-vision spectacle as the controls. Cycloplegic refraction was performed at baseline. Axial length was measured at baseline and 12 months after initial lens wear, and ALG was defined as the difference. In the ortho-k group, TZ decentration and the RCRP map were calculated from the topography map obtained at the 12-month visit. RCRP were summed within various chord radii from the cornea center, and the association to TZ decentration, spherical equivalent (SE), ALG were analyzed with linear regressions. RESULTS: Compared to the controls, children wearing orthokeratology lenses had significantly smaller ALG over 1 year (0.1 ± 0.15 mm vs. 0.32 ± 0.17 mm, p < 0.001). ALG was significantly and negatively associated with summed RCRP within the central cornea of 2 mm in radius. The mean TZ decentration was 0.62 ± 0.25 mm, and the mean direction was 214.26 ± 7.39 degrees. ALG was negatively associated with the TZ decentration magnitude (p < 0.01), but not the direction (p = 0.905). TZ decentration caused an asymmetrical distribution of the RCRP with the nasal side plus power shifting towards the corneal center. For chord radius ranging 1-2 mm, the association between TZ decentration and the summed RCRP were significant, and the proportion of variance accountable increased with chord radius. For chord radius beyond 1.5 mm, the association between baseline spherical equivalent (SE) and summed RCRP was significant. The portion of variance accountable by SE increased and peaked in 2.5 mm chord radius. CONCLUSIONS: A larger TZ decentration was associated with a larger summed RCRP in the central cornea. It may be one of the possible reasons why TZ decentration is beneficial to retarding myopia progression.

Changes of corneal parameters in different areas after cataract surgery / 国际眼科杂志(Guoji Yanke Zazhi)

AIM: To compare the distribution characteristics of axial sagittal front power(ASF), true net power(TNP), total corneal refractive power(TCRP)and the difference in back-front corneal radius ratio(B/F ratio)after cataract surgery.METHODS: A prospective study. A total of 156 patients(156 eyes)with age-related cataract who attend Weifang Eye Hospital for cataract surgery from December 2020 to May 2021 were collected. Pentacam was performed before operation and 3mo after operation to collect ASF, TNP and TCRP on 2, 4 and 6mm diameters rings and areas on the corneal apex and pupil-centered, as well as B/F ratio.RESULTS: 3mo after operation, there was no statistical difference in ASF on the 2mm diameters ring and area centered on the corneal apex compared with preoperative values(all P&#x003E;0.05), however, the ASF values on the 4 and 6mm diameters rings and areas were significantly different from those before surgery(all P&#x003C;0.05); There was no statistical difference in ASF on the 2mm diameters rings and areas centered on the pupil compared with preoperative values(all P&#x003E;0.05). The postoperative values of TNP and TCRP on the 2, 4 and 6mm diameters rings and areas centered on the corneal apex and centered on the pupil were statistically different before surgery(all P&#x003C;0.05). Preoperative, TCRP values were different between 2mm and 6mm and between 4mm and 6mm on both corneal apex and pupil-centered rings(all P&#x003C;0.0167), TCRP values were all different between 2mm and 6mm diameters areas on corneal apex and pupil-centered(all P&#x003C;0.0167); 3mo after operation, TCRP values were different on corneal apex and pupil-centered rings between 2mm and 6mm and between 4mm and 6mm diameters(all P&#x003C;0.0167). While TCRP values on the corneal apex and pupil-centered areas were only different between 2mm and 6mm diameters(all P&#x003C;0.0167). The preoperative B/F ratio of patients was 81.79%±1.87%, and the postoperative B/ F ratio of patients was 80.68%±2.23%(P&#x003C;0.001).CONCLUSION: Corneal parameters of different diameters of rings and areas centered on the corneal apex and pupil before and after cataract surgery may change and differ, which should be taken into account when selecting the K value for intraocular lens calculation and individualizing the selection of IOLs based on corneal characteristics.

Comparison of corneal refractive power and astigmatism measured by CASIA2, IOLMaster 700 and Pentacam in cataract patients / 中华实验眼科杂志

Objective:To compare the difference and consistency of anterior corneal surface and total corneal refractive power and astigmatism measured by CASIA2, IOLMaster 700 and Pentacam in patients with age-related cataract.Methods:A diagnostic test was conducted.Two-hundred patients (200 eyes) with age-related cataract were enrolled in Tianjin Medical University Eye Hospital from March to April 2021.The steep keratometry (Ks), flat keratometry (Kf), mean keratometry (Km), degree and axis of astigmatism of the anterior and the total corneal surface of patients were measured by CASIA2, IOLMaster 700 and Pentacam, respectively.The astigmatism was transformed into J0 and J45 by Fourier transform formula.The differences and correlation of the measurements obtained with the three instruments were analyzed by one-way repeated measures analysis of variance and Pearson correlation analysis.The consistency was evaluated by Bland-Altman test.This study adhered to the Declaration of Helsinki.The study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of Tianjin Medical University Eye Hospital (No.2021KY-07).Results:There were statistically significant differences in anterior corneal surface Kf and J0 measured by the three instruments ( F=18.563, 16.172; both at P=0.001). The Kf measured by CASIA2 was significantly higher than that measured by IOLMaster 700, and the J0 measured by IOLMaster 700 was significantly higher than that measured by Pentacam (both at P<0.05). There were statistically significant differences in total corneal Ks, Kf, Km and J0 measured by the three instruments, which from IOLMaster 700 were the largest, followed by CASIA2, then Pentacam ( F=1 300.447, 1 274.117, 1 609.713, 10.372; all at P=0.001). Pearson correlation analysis showed that the corneal refractive power measured by the three instruments was highly correlated (all at r>0.935, P<0.01), and the correlation of astigmatism values was weaker than the corneal refractive power ( r=0.623-0.908, all at P<0.01). Bland-Altman analysis showed that the three instruments had good consistency in measuring the anterior corneal surface refractive power, anterior corneal surface astigmatism and total corneal astigmatism, which were clinically acceptable, while the consistency of total corneal refractive power measurement was poor.The difference in measuring total corneal refractive power was large between IOLMaster 700 and Pentacam, and relatively small between CASIA2 and Pentacam. Conclusions:The consistency of CASIA2, IOLMaster 700 and Pentacam is good in measuring the anterior corneal surface refractive power of patients with age-related cataract, which can be substitutable, but poor in measuring the total corneal refractive power.The total corneal refractive power measurement from IOLMaster700 is the largest, the smallest from Pentacam, which is not recommended to be clinically exchangeable.

Evaluation of axial length/total corneal refractive power ratio as a potential marker for ocular diagnosis of Marfan's syndrome in children.

AIM: To investigate whether the axial length (AL)/total corneal refractive power (TCRP) ratio is a sensitive and simple factor that can be used for the early diagnosis of Marfan's syndrome (MFS) in children. METHODS: The relationship between the AL/TCRP ratio and the diagnosis of MFS for 192 eyes in 97 children were evaluate. The biological characteristics, including age, sex, AL, and TCRP, were collected from medical records. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to investigate whether the AL/TCRP ratio effectively distinguishes MFS from other subjects. The Youden index was used to re-divide the whole population into two groups according to an AL/TCRP ratio of 0.59. RESULTS: Of 96 subjects (mean age 7.46±3.28y) evaluated, 56 (110 eyes) had a definite diagnosis of MFS in childhood based on the revised Ghent criteria, 41 (82 eyes) with diagnosis of congenital ectopia lentis (EL) were included as a control group. AL was negatively correlated with TCRP, with a linear regression coefficient of -0.36 (R 2=0.08). A significant correlation was found between age and the AL/TCRP ratio (P=0.023). ROC curve analysis showed that the AL/TCRP ratio distinguished MFS from the other patients at a threshold of 0.59. MFS patients were present in 24/58 (41.38%) patients with an AL/TCRP ratio of ≤0.59 and in 34/39 (87.18%) patients with an AL/TCRP ratio of >0.59. CONCLUSION: An AL/TCRP ratio of >0.59 is significantly associated with the risk of MFS. The AL/TCRP ratio should be measured as a promising marker for the prognosis of children MFS. Changes in the AL/TCRP ratio should be monitored over time.

The Spatial Distribution of Relative Corneal Refractive Power Shift and Axial Growth in Myopic Children: Orthokeratology Versus Multifocal Contact Lens.

PURPOSE: To determine if the spatial distribution of the relative corneal refractive power shift (RCRPS) explains the retardation of axial length (AL) elongation after treatment by either orthokeratology (OK) or multifocal soft contact lenses (MFCLs). METHODS: Children (8-14 years) were enrolled in the OK (n = 35) or MFCL (n = 36) groups. RCRPS maps were derived by computing the difference between baseline and 12-month corneal topography maps and then subtracting the apex values. Values at the same radius were averaged to obtain the RCRPS profile, from which four parameters were extracted: (1) Half_x and (2) Half_y, i.e., the x- and y-coordinates where each profile first reached the half peak; (3) Sum4 and (4) Sum7, i.e., the summation of powers within a corneal area of 4- and 7-mm diameters. Correlations between AL elongation and these parameters were analyzed by multiple linear regression. RESULTS: AL elongation in the OK group was significantly smaller than that in the MFCL group (p = 0.040). Half_x and Half_y were also smaller in the OK group than the MFCL group (p < 0.001 each). Half_x was correlated with AL elongation in the OK group (p = 0.005), but not in the MFCL group (p = 0.600). In an analysis that combined eyes of both groups, Half_x was correlated with AL elongation (ß = 0.161, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The OK-induced AL elongation and associated RCRPS Half_x were smaller than for the MFCL. Contact lenses that induce RCRPS closer to the corneal center may exert better myopia control.