Associations of combined accelerated biological aging and genetic susceptibility with incident dementia: a prospective study in the UK Biobank.

BACKGROUND: Accelerated biological aging has been verified to be a critical risk factor for a number of age-related diseases, but its role in dementia remained unclear. Whether it modified the effects of genetic factors was also unknown. This study evaluated the associations between accelerated biological aging and dementia and the moderating role of accelerated biological aging in the genetic susceptibility to the disease. METHODS: We included 200,731 participants in the UK biobank. Nine clinical blood biomarkers and chronological age were used to calculate Phenotypic age acceleration (PhenoAgeAccel), which is a novel indicator for accelerated biological aging. The associations of PhenoAgeAccel with dementia, both young-onset and late-onset dementia, were assessed by Cox proportional hazard models. Apolipoprotein E (APOE) alleles and polygenic risk scores (PRS) were used to evaluate the genetic risk of dementia. The interactions between genetic susceptibility and biological aging were tested on both multiplicative and additive scales. RESULTS: These findings showed individuals who were in the highest quartile of PhenoAgeAccel had a higher risk with incidence of dementia compared to individuals in the lowest quartile of PhenoAgeAccel (HR: 1.145 (95% CI: 1.050, 1.249)). Individuals with biologically older had a higher risk of dementia than individuals with biologically younger (HR: 1.069 (95% CI: 1.004, 1.138)). Furthermore, compared to individuals with biologically younger and low APOE ε4-related genetic risk, individuals with biologically younger and high APOE ε4-related genetic risk (HR:3.048 (95% CI: 2.811, 3.305)) had a higher risk of dementia than individuals with biologically older and high APOE ε4-related genetic risk (HR: 2.765 (95% CI: 2.523, 3.029)). Meanwhile, referring to low dementia PRS and biologically younger, the risk of dementia increased by 72.7% (HR: 1.727 (95% CI: 1.538, 1.939) in the biologically younger and high PRS group and 58.7% (HR: 1.587 (95% CI: 1.404, 1.793) in the biologically older and high PRS group, respectively. The negative interactions between PhenoAgeAccel with APOE ε4 and PRS were also tested on the additive scale. CONCLUSIONS: Accelerated biological aging could bring the extra risk of dementia but attenuate the effects of genetic risk on dementia. These findings provide insights for precise prevention and intervention of dementia.

Flavonoid-Rich Fruit Intake in Midlife and Late-Life and Associations with Risk of Dementia: The Framingham Heart Study.

BACKGROUND: Fruits are an important source of flavonoids, and greater intake of dietary flavonoids in older adults has been shown to be associated with decreased risk of dementia. It is unclear whether this relationship is similar or different between younger adults and older adults. OBJECTIVES: We examined for associations between midlife and late-life intake of flavonoid-rich fruits and incident dementia. We hypothesized that greater total cumulative intake of flavonoid-rich fruits in midlife and late-life adults would be associated with reduced risk of all-cause dementia. DESIGN: Longitudinal, cohort study design. SETTING: Framingham Heart Study, which is a longitudinal, multi-generational community-based cohort based in Framingham, Massachusetts, USA. PARTICIPANTS: Participants from the Framingham Heart Study Offspring cohort were included (n = 2,790) who attended the fifth core exam between 1991 to 1995, and were dementia-free and at least 45 years of age at that time, as well as had valid food frequency questionnaires from the fifth to ninth core exams. MEASUREMENTS: Consumption of fruits with high flavonoid content or are important contributors to overall flavonoid intake was collected via food frequency questionnaire. Flavonoid-rich fruits from the food frequency questionnaire included raisins or grapes, prunes, bananas, fresh apples or pears, apple juice or cider, oranges, orange juice, grapefruit, grapefruit juice, strawberries, blueberries, and peaches, apricots, or plums. Dementia ascertainment was based on a multidisciplinary consensus committee, and included all-cause dementia and Alzheimer's disease dementia diagnoses based on research criteria. Cox models were used to examine associations between cumulative fruit intake and incident dementia, stratified by midlife (45-59 years; n = 1,642) and late-life (60-82 years; n = 1,148). RESULTS: Greater cumulative total fruit intake in midlife, but not late-life, was significantly associated with a 44% decreased risk of all-cause dementia (HR = 0.56; 95% CI = 0.32 - 0.98; p = 0.044). Decreased risk of all-cause dementia was also associated with higher intake of apples or pears in midlife and late-life, as well as higher intake of raisins or grapes in midlife only, and higher intake of oranges, grapefruit, blueberries, and peaches, apricots, or plums in late-life only. CONCLUSIONS: Among participants from the Framingham Heart Study, greater overall consumption of flavonoid-rich fruits in midlife was associated with reduced risk of dementia, though intake of specific fruits in midlife and late-life may have a protective role against developing dementia. These findings may help to inform future recommendations on when dietary interventions may be most beneficial to healthy brain aging across the life course.

Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs and Dementia Prevention: A Systematic Review of Observational Evidence in Rheumatoid Arthritis.

BACKGROUND: Many observational studies have examined the association of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) with dementia risk, but the evidence has been mixed, possibly due to methodological reasons. This systematic review (PROSPERO: CRD42023432122) aims to assess existing observational evidence and to suggest if repurposing DMARDs for dementia prevention merits further investigation. METHODS: Four electronic databases up to October 26, 2023, were searched. Cohort or case-control studies that examined dementia risk associated with DMARDs in people with rheumatoid arthritis were included. Risk of bias was evaluated using the Cochrane Collaboration's Risk of Bias in Nonrandomized Studies of Interventions (ROBINS-I) criteria. Findings were summarized by individual drug classes and by risk of bias. RESULTS: Of 12,180 unique records, 14 studies (4 case-control studies, 10 cohort studies) were included. According to the ROBINS-I criteria, there were 2 studies with low risk of bias, 1 study with moderate risk, and 11 studies with serious or critical risk. Among studies with low risk of bias, one study suggested that hydroxychloroquine versus methotrexate was associated with lower incident dementia, and the other study showed no associations of tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors, tocilizumab, and tofacitinib, compared to abatacept, with incident dementia. CONCLUSION: Studies that adequately addressed important biases were limited. Studies with low risk of bias did not support repurposing TNF inhibitors, tocilizumab, abatacept or tofacitinib for dementia prevention, but hydroxychloroquine may be a potential candidate. Further studies that carefully mitigate important sources of biases are warranted, and long-term evidence will be preferred.

Bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) Vaccine Impact on Dementia Risk in Bladder Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: The BCG vaccine has been traditionally administered to prevent TB. It has been additionally used in bladder cancer patients as a therapy with success. Some observational studies found that bladder cancer patients receiving BCG may have reduced dementia risk, however, the evidence is not conclusive. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the impact of BCG vaccine on dementia risk in bladder cancer patients. METHODS: Six databases were searched from inception to January 13, 2024, for published and unpublished studies that examine the association between BCG and dementia risk in bladder cancer patients. We conducted meta-analyses using a random-effects model. RESULTS: Eight retrospective cohort studies were included in the systematic review and seven in the meta-analyses. Because there were studies with overlapping populations, two separate main analyses were performed reassuring the avoidance of overlap. The first analysis showed that compared to controls, BCG did not reduce dementia risk [5 studies pooled, n=88,852, HR = 0.65, 95% CI (0.40, 1.06), I2 = 85%] whereas there was a marginally significant risk reduction in the second analysis [6 studies pooled, n=70,025, HR = 0.63, 95% CI (0.40, 0.97), I2 = 83%]. Sensitivity analysis excluding the unpublished studies did not affect the outcome importantly. Additional meta-analysis showed that BCG did not reduce the risk of Alzheimer's disease. CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis of observational studies found that BCG administration in bladder cancer patients has likely a minimally positive impact on dementia risk if any. To better understand the effect of BCG on dementia, randomized controlled trials are needed.

The Relationship between History of Traumatic Brain Injury and Longitudinal Changes in Cortical Thickness among Patients with Alzheimer's Disease.

BACKGROUND: There has been little direct examination of how traumatic brain injury (TBI) affects the rate of neurodegeneration for individuals with Alzheimer's disease (AD). METHODS: The study examined 89 cognitively normal adults (65 with and 24 without prior TBI) and 65 with AD (16 with and 49 without prior TBI). Cortical thickness was quantified from T1-weighted MRI scans at baseline and follow-up (mean interval 33.4 months). Partial least squares analysis was used to evaluate the effects of AD and TBI history on the longitudinal change in cortical thickness. RESULTS: Significant group effects were identified throughout the frontal and temporal cortices. Comparison of the AD groups to their control cohorts showed greater relative atrophy for the AD cohort with prior TBI. CONCLUSION: These results indicate that a history of TBI exacerbates longitudinal declines in cortical thickness among AD patients, providing new insights into the shared pathomechanisms between these neurological conditions.

Meaningful patient and public engagement in dissemination-embedding co-production in dementia research.

Background: Patient and Public Involvement and Engagement (PPIE) is still underutilised in both dementia research and corresponding dissemination activities. Aim: To describe the methods, format, and lessons learned in co-creating and co-producing a dissemination strategy for a research project focused on establishing patient-centred outcome measures into routine palliative community care for persons living with dementia (PLWD) and their informal carers. Materials and methods: A participatory, hybrid-format workshop was conducted to co-create the dissemination strategy with a PPIE group. A video presentation of findings and a list of prompts shared prior to the workshop were used to elicit views on dissemination strategies and knowledge translation. The workshop was followed up with a survey to consolidate the dissemination strategy. Workshop minutes and survey responses were analysed using qualitative thematic analysis. Results: 22 participants from our diverse PPIE group attended the workshop. Two major themes emerged: (a) Knowledge translation: building bridges between research and practise, and (b) Collaboration and dissemination: everyone's voice is needed. Participants suggested critical changes to dissemination methods and materials. Successful knowledge translation depends on a strong evidence base. For this, materials need to be tailored to specific audiences. Everyone's voice needs to be integrated through co-production in dissemination activities by PPIE members to influence societal change. Tailored dissemination activities within a dissemination strategy were co-created spanning all phases of the research cycle. Discussion: Informing and educating the public and policymakers about the needs of PLWD relies on disseminating and fostering knowledge translation throughout all phases of the research cycle.

Antibodies in neurological diseases: Established, emerging, explorative.

Within a few years, autoantibodies targeting the nervous system resulted in a novel disease classification. For several of them, which we termed 'established', direct pathogenicity has been proven and now guides diagnostic pathways and early immunotherapy. For a rapidly growing number of further anti-neuronal autoantibodies, the role in disease is less clear. Increasing evidence suggests that they could contribute to disease, by playing a modulating role on brain function. We therefore suggest a three-level classification of neurological autoantibodies according to the degree of experimentally proven pathogenicity and strength of clinical association: established, emerging, explorative. This may facilitate focusing on clinical constellations in which autoantibody-mediated mechanisms have not been assumed previously, including autoimmune psychosis and dementia, cognitive impairment in cancer, and neurodegenerative diseases. Based on recent data reviewed here, humoral autoimmunity may represent an additional "super-system" for brain health. The "brain antibody-ome", that is, the composition of thousands of anti-neuronal autoantibodies, may shape neuronal function not only in disease, but even in healthy aging. Towards this novel concept, extensive research will have to elucidate pathogenicity from the atomic to the clinical level, autoantibody by autoantibody. Such profiling can uncover novel biomarkers, enhance our understanding of underlying mechanisms, and identify selective therapies.

Psychological outcomes of dementia risk estimation in MCI patients: Results from the PreDADQoL project.

INTRODUCTION: Understanding the impact of biomarker-based dementia risk estimation in people with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and their care partners is critical for patient care. METHODS: MCI patients and study partners were counseled on Alzheimer's disease (AD) biomarker and dementia risk was disclosed. Data on mood, quality of life (QoL), and satisfaction with life (SwL) were obtained 1 week and 3 months after disclosure. RESULTS: Seventy-six dyads were enrolled, and two-thirds of the patients opted for biomarker testing. None of the participants experienced clinically relevant depression or anxiety after disclosure. All dyads reported moderate to high QoL and SwL throughout the study. Patients reported more subthreshold depressive symptoms 1 week and lower QoL and SwL 3 months after disclosure. In patients, depression (odds ratio [OR]: 0.76) and anxiety (OR: 0.81) were significant predictors for the decision against biomarker testing. DISCUSSION: No major psychological harm is to be expected in MCI patients and care partners after dementia risk disclosure. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study is registered in the German clinical trials register (Deutsches Register Klinischer Studien, DRKS): http://www.drks.de/DRKS00011155, DRKS registration number: DRKS00011155, date of registration: 18.08.2017. HIGHLIGHTS: Patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and study partners were counseled on Alzheimer's disease (AD) biomarker-based dementia risk estimation. About two-thirds of patients opted for biomarker testing and received their dementia risk based on their AD biomarker status. Patients who decided in favor or against CSF biomarker testing differed in psychological features. We did not observe major psychological harm after the dementia risk disclosure. Coping strategies were associated with better subsequent mood and well-being in all participants.

Evaluating the updated LATE-NC staging criteria using data from NACC.

INTRODUCTION: Limbic-predominant age-related TAR DNA-binding protein of 43 kDa encephalopathy neuropathologic change (LATE-NC) staging criteria were updated in 2023. We evaluated this updated staging using National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center data. METHODS: We examined associations of LATE-NC stages with cognition and other neuropathologic changes (NCs), and with cognition while accounting for other NCs, using multilevel regression models. RESULTS: Of 1352 participants, 502 (37%) had LATE-NC (23% stage 1a, 6% stage 1b, 58% stage 2, 13% stage 3). LATE-NC stages were associated with cognition, hippocampal sclerosis of aging (HS-A), Alzheimer's disease NC (ADNC), Lewy bodies (LBs), and hippocampal atrophy. While stage 1b was associated with cognition and HS-A consistent with other stages, it was not associated with ADNC or LBs. All LATE-NC stages remained significantly associated with worse cognition when accounting for other NCs. DISCUSSION: The updated LATE-NC staging criteria capture variations in early TDP-43 pathology spread which are consequential for cognition and associations with other NCs. HIGHLIGHTS: We applied the updated limbic-predominant age-related TAR DNA-binding protein of 43 kDa encephalopathy neuropathologic change (LATE-NC) staging criteria to data from the National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center. LATE-NC stage 1b was identified in 22% of participants with stage 1. In contrast to other LATE-NC stages, stage 1b was not associated with Alzheimer's disease neuropathologic change (ADNC) or Lewy bodies. Stages 1a and 1b were significantly associated with dementia and memory impairment. Stages 1b+ were more strongly tied to dementia than all other neuropathologic changes except high likelihood ADNC.

Lower Incidence of Dementia Following Cancer Diagnoses: Evidence from a Large Cohort and Mendelian Randomization Study.

BACKGROUND: The reported inverse association between cancer and subsequent Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRD) remains uncertain. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the association between these common conditions of old age and explore possible causal factors. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS AND MEASUREMENTS: We conducted a large population-based cohort analysis using data from 3,021,508 individuals aged 60 and over in the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD), over a period up to 30 years (1988-2018). Cox proportional hazards models were fitted to estimate hazard ratios (HR) for risk of dementia associated with previous cancer diagnosis. Competing risk models were employed to account for competing risk of death. Two-sample Mendelian Randomization analysis based on meta-analysis data from large-scale GWAS studies was also conducted. RESULTS: In the CPRD cohort, 412,903 participants had cancer diagnosis and 230,558 were subsequently diagnosed with dementia over a median follow-up period of 7.9 years. Cancer survivors had a 25% lower risk of developing dementia (HR=0.75, 95% CI:0.74-0.76) after adjustment for potential confounders. Accounting for competing risk of death provided a sub-distribution HR of 0.56 (95% CI:0.55-0.56). Results were consistent for prevalent and incident cancer and different common cancer types. Two-sample Mendelian Randomization analysis, using 357 cancer-related instrumental single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) revealed evidence of vertical pleiotropy between genetically predicted cancer and reduced risk of Alzheimer's disease (OR=0.97,95% CI:0.95-0.99). CONCLUSION: Our results provide strong epidemiological evidence of the inverse association between cancer and risk of ADRD and support the potential causal nature of this association via genetic instruments. Further investigations into the precise underlying biological mechanisms may reveal valuable information for new therapeutic approaches.

Association between Family Household Income and Cognitive Resilience among Older US Adults: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Cognitive resilience has emerged as a mechanism that may help explain individual differences in cognitive function associated with aging and/or pathology. It is unknown whether an association exists between family income level and cognitive resilience. We performed a cross-sectional study to estimate the relationship between family income level and high cognitive resilience using the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) among older adults (age≥60). Logistic regression was used to estimate the association between income level and high cognitive resilience adjusted for other factors. Accounting for differences in education, occupation, and health status, older adults in the highest income category were twice as likely compared to those with very low income to have high cognitive resilience (OR: 1.90, 95% CI: 1.05,3.43). A doseresponse was apparent between income category and high cognitive resilience. The finding that income, above and beyond that of known factors, affects cognitive function is important for future public health strategies that aim to prevent or delay cognitive impairment.

Medical Costs and Caregiver Burden of Delivering Disease-Modifying Alzheimer's Treatments with Different Duration and Route of Administration.

BACKGROUND: Multiple disease modifying treatment for Alzheimer's disease are currently in clinical development or have been recently approved for use. They have vastly different treatment properties but so far, little work has been done to quantify the impact of treatment properties on the treatment's value in terms of medical and social care costs and caregiver burden. OBJECTIVES: This study aims to analyze how the mode of treatment administration, treatment frequency and duration, and monitoring requirements affect the value of disease modifying treatments. In order to isolate these effects, we compare five hypothetical disease modifying treatments with equal efficacy and safety: (1) chronic bi-weekly intravenous infusion, (2) chronic four-weekly intravenous infusion, (3) 52 weeks fixed duration four-weekly intravenous infusion, (4) chronic subcutaneous injections, and (5) chronic oral prescription on their direct medical costs, caregiver burden, and preservation of treatment value. DESIGN: Survey of Alzheimer's disease treatment clinics and retrospective data analysis. SETTING: United States. MEASUREMENTS: Direct medical cost and caregiver burden of treatment administration and monitoring compared to gross treatment benefit. RESULTS: Chronic bi-weekly infusion treatment had the highest direct medical cost ($45,208) and caregiver burden ($6,095), reducing the treatment value by 44%, while oral treatment with the lowest direct medical cost ($1,983) and caregiver burden ($457) reduced the treatment value by only 2%. Substantial caregiver burden was reported from the survey, with a reported average of 2.3 hours for an office visit and infusion, 44 minutes of round-trip travel time, and 78% of patients being accompanied by a caregiver for treatment. CONCLUSION: Burden of chronic intravenous treatments exceed the gross medical and social care cost savings and value of caregiver benefit. The results suggest the need for less complex treatments that require fewer clinic visits to preserve the economic value of disease modifying treatments.

Risk of Dementia in Korean Vietnam War Veterans.

BACKGROUND: The number of cases of all types of dementia is increasing, and a significant increase in prevalence has been noted among veterans. Evidence of an association between dementia and exposure to chemicals such as Agent Orange from the Vietnam War is still limited, and there is a reported lack of awareness. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate the risk of dementia among Vietnam War veterans in Korea. DESIGN: This retrospective longitudinal study compared the incidence of dementia between Vietnam War veterans and the general population. SETTING: This study used data from the nationally representative Korean Vietnam War Veterans' Health Study Cohort, a combined dataset sourced from the Ministry of Patriots and Veterans Affairs in Korea and the National Health Insurance Sharing Service database. PARTICIPANTS: There were 191,272 Vietnam War veterans and 1,000,320 people of different ages, sexes, and residences. matched control in 2002. The total number of person-years were 18,543,181. MEASUREMENTS: The dementia group included participants who had visited a medical facility with any of the following ICD-10 codes in the follow-up periods: "F00 Dementia in Alzheimer's disease," "F01 Vascular dementia," "F02 Dementia in other diseases classified elsewhere," or "F03 Unspecified dementia." RESULTS: The incidence rate ratio for all types of dementia was 1.16, with higher ratios observed for vascular and unspecified dementia, particularly in the younger age groups. There was a significant increase in the risk of dementia, Alzheimer's disease, vascular dementia, and unspecified dementia. CONCLUSION: Vietnam War veterans showed an increased risk for all types of dementia. These findings are hypothesized to be due to the effects of the chemicals used during the Vietnam War, which can cause a variety of neurodegenerative diseases. Further studies are warranted to investigate the potential health determinants related to the Vietnam War, focusing on the neurodegenerative effects.

Heightened Prevalence of Common Hospital-Treated Infections Preceding Dementia Diagnosis with Accelerated Dementia Onset after Influenza.

BACKGROUND: Since the beginning of Alzheimer's disease research, the hypothesis that infections are to some extent associated with neurodegenerative processes has been tested repeatedly. Epidemiological studies on the associations between infections and dementia have reported conflicting results. OBJECTIVES: This study analyses common hospital-treated infections (herpes, influenza, intestinal infections, pneumonia, sepsis, urinary tract infections) and their association with subsequent dementia and time until dementia onset. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: For this nationwide population-based case-control study, the dataset of the Austrian National Health Insurance Association was used, including dementia patients (dementia cohort) and age- and gender-matched non-demented individuals (control cohort). Only subjects with data availability of at least 10 years prior to the index date (date of dementia diagnosis or date of censoring) were included. MEASUREMENTS: The incidence of six common infections in older adults (herpes, influenza, intestinal infections, pneumonia, sepsis, and urinary tract infections) was analyzed over a period of 10 years before the censoring date. RESULTS: The study population consists of 58208 subjects (29104 per study cohort), mean age: 81 years, 54% females. Patients of the dementia cohort had suffered from infections significantly more often than patients of the control cohort (6002, 20.6% vs. 4826, 16.6%; p < 0.001). Influenza, urinary tract infections, intestinal infections, and sepsis showed independent positive associations with subsequent dementia diagnosis, irrespective of other comorbidities (odds ratios: 1.26 (95% CI: 1.06-1.49), 1.23 (95% CI: 1.16-1.30), 1.16 (95% CI: 1.07-1.27), 1.17 (95% CI: 1.01-1.37), respectively). Time from infection to dementia diagnosis was shorter after influenza compared to all other infections (median: 3.4 years (95% CI: 3.1-3.7) vs. 6.6 years (95% CI: 6.4-6.8); p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: This is the first study to assess the association between infections and dementia over such a long minimum reporting period. These results, supported by consistent data from other epidemiological studies, emphasize the critical importance of infection prevention measures, especially for older adults. Further research is crucial to better understand the nature of the relationship between infections and dementia.

Associations of Blood Pressure Trajectories with Subsequent Cognitive Decline, Dementia and Mortality.

BACKGROUND: Hypertension may harm cognitive performance, but the potential correlates of longitudinal patterns of blood pressure (BP), especially diastolic BP (DBP), to cognition have been unclear. OBJECTIVES: To examine long-term BP trajectories in relation to subsequent cognitive decline, incident dementia and all-cause mortality in the general population. DESIGN: Population-based cohort study. SETTING: Communities in England. PARTICIPANTS: The study included 7566 participants from the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing (ELSA). MEASUREMENTS: BP were measured in 1998, 2004, 2008. Group-based trajectory modeling was used to identify long-term patterns of systolic BP (SBP) and DBP. Outcomes including cognitive function, incident dementia, and all-cause mortality were followed up to 10 years. RESULTS: Five distinct trajectories were identified for SBP and DBP, respectively. The normal-stable trajectory was used as the reference. For cognitive decline, both SBP and DBP trajectories were independently associated with subsequent cognitive decline, with the fastest decline appeared in the high-stable SBP group of 180 mmHg and the low-stable DBP group of 60 mmHg (both P<0.005). For incident dementia, the multivariable adjusted hazard ratio (HR) was also greatest in high-stable group (4.79, 95% confidence interval: 2.84 to 8.07) across all SBP trajectories. Conversely, low (HR: 1.58) and moderate-low stable (HR: 1.56) DBP trajectories increased dementia risk (both P<0.005). Similar patterns were found in BP trajectories in relation to all-cause mortality. CONCLUSION: Our study evaluates the potential health impact from different BP trajectories and suggests that controlling long-term SBP and maintaining adequate DBP may be relevant for the current practice to promote cognitive health and extend lifespan.

Validation of a Community-Based Approach Toward Personalized Dementia Risk Reduction: The Kimel Family Centre for Brain Health and Wellness.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: The Kimel Family Centre for Brain Health and Wellness is a research-driven community centre testing the efficacy of personalized dementia risk reduction programming on dementia risk and cognition. The objective of this protocol is to validate this approach by following people for two years. DESIGN/SETTING: Participants will receive a comprehensive dementia risk assessment, including nonmodifiable and modifiable risk factors, from which they will receive a Personalized Dementia Risk Report and Program Strategy, indicating their health conditions increasing and their risk level in five modifiable risk domains: physical activity, brain-healthy eating, cognitive engagement, social connections, and mental wellbeing. Equipped with this information, participants will enroll in programs within the Centre to address their risk factors. Changes to their dementia risk, cognition, and Personalized Program Strategy will be communicated through re-assessments of risk factors every six months (risk and cognition) and every year (comprehensive assessment). PARTICIPANTS: Participants (n = 450) will be 50 years of age or older, without a diagnosis of dementia, and sufficiently fluent in English to complete the assessments and understand program instructors. One goal is that our participant sample will include people of low income (with fundraising providing free community centre membership), and from various ethno-racial backgrounds. INTERVENTION: Participants will select programs to meet their Personalized Program Strategy. For physical activity, they will gradually work toward the Canadian Society for Exercise Physiology guidelines. For brain-healthy eating, they will learn about the Brain Health Food Guide and food label reading, and then take additional programs. For cognitive engagement and mental wellbeing, they will take at least one hour of relevant programming per week. Social connections will be reinforced throughout all programs. All participants will also have access to the Canadian Consortium on Neurodegeneration's CAN-THUMBS Up online, educational program on modifiable dementia risk factors, called Brain Health PRO. MEASUREMENTS: The comprehensive assessment includes numerous dementia risk factors, but the primary measures are risk in the five domains, health conditions proximal to those five risk domains, and cognition, and how these are affected by adherence and quality of goal-directed future simulation. We hypothesize a reduced risk in the five domains within six months, improvements in health biomarkers within a year, and maintenance of cognition within two years, with these benefits accruing with greater adherence, but only up to a point, at which benefits will plateau, and greater benefits among participants whose goal-directed simulations are more vivid, personally-relevant, achievable, and positive. CONCLUSIONS: This innovative approach overcomes a number of limitations present in prior multidomain dementia prevention trials. Adapting a preference clinical trial that is embedded in a community centre, where participants have autonomy to choose programs to address their modifiable dementia risk factors, has real-world applicability in the global effort to reduce dementia risk.

A Pilot Study of BRAIN BOOTCAMP, a Low-Intensity Intervention on Diet, Exercise, Cognitive Activity, and Social Interaction to Improve Older Adults' Dementia Risk Scores.

BACKGROUND: Little is known about the impact of short, low-intensity multidomain dementia risk reduction interventions in older adults. OBJECTIVES: To examine the effectiveness and feasibility of a low-intensity multidomain lifestyle intervention on dementia risk and dementia literacy in Australian older adults. DESIGN: Single-group pre-post design. SETTING: Community-dwelling. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 853 older Australians (Mean age=73.3 years, SD=6.1) recruited from the community. INTERVENTION: A 3-month dementia risk reduction program, BRAIN BOOTCAMP, including education, personalised risk information, physical cues for healthier choices and goal setting and planning to target four modifiable risk factors of diet, exercise, cognitive activity and social interaction in older adults. MEASUREMENTS: The 'LIfestyle for BRAin health' (LIBRA) index was used to assess participants' modifiable dementia risk based on 12 factors, with higher scores indicating greater risk. Dementia literacy was measured using a modified questionnaire derived from Dutch and British surveys, encompassing knowledge, risk reduction, and awareness aspects. Paired t-tests were used to compare dementia risk scores and dementia literacy before and after the program. Multivariate regressions were performed to identify sociodemographic and psychological factors associated with change in the LIBRA index. RESULTS: Program attrition was high (58.3%). Participants who completed the program had decreased dementia risk scores (Cohen's d=0.59, p<0.001), increased dementia literacy and awareness (Cohen's d=0.64, p<0.001) and increased motivation to change lifestyle behaviors (Cohen's d=0.25-0.52, p<0.016). Participants with higher motivational beliefs had greater dementia risk reduction. CONCLUSIONS: Improving older adults' motivation and knowledge may help modify lifestyle behaviors to reduce dementia risk. However, program attrition remains a challenge, suggesting the need for strategies to enhance participant engagement and retention in such interventions.

Potentially Modifiable Dementia Risk Factors in Canada: An Analysis of Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging with a Multi-Country Comparison.

BACKGROUND: It has been suggested that up to 40% of dementia cases worldwide are associated with modifiable risk factors; however, these estimates are not known in Canada. Furthermore, sleep disturbances, an emerging factor, has not been incorporated into the life-course model of dementia prevention. OBJECTIVE: To estimate the population impact of 12 modifiable risk factors in Canadian adults including sleep disturbances, by sex and age groups, and to compare with other countries. DESIGN: Cross-sectional analysis of Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging baseline data. SETTING: Community. PARTICIPANTS: 30,097 adults aged 45 years and older. MEASUREMMENTS: Prevalence and Population Attributable Fractions (PAFs) associated with less education, hearing loss, traumatic brain injury, hypertension, excessive alcohol, obesity, smoking, depression, social isolation, physical inactivity, diabetes, and sleep disturbances. RESULTS: The risk factors with the largest PAF were later life physical inactivity (10.2%; 95% CI, 6.8% to 13%), midlife hearing loss (6.5%; 3.7% to 9.3%), midlife obesity (6.4%; 4.1% to 7.7%), and midlife hypertension (6.2%; 2.7% to 9.3%). The PAF of later life sleep disturbances was 3.0% (95% CI, 1.8% to 3.8%). The 12 risk factors accounted for 51.9% (32.2% to 68.0%) of dementia among men and 52.4% (32.5% to 68.7%) among women. Overall, the combined PAF of all risk factors was 49.2% (31.1% to 64.9%), and it increased with age. CONCLUSION: Nearly up to 50% of dementia cases in Canada are attributable to 12 modifiable risk factors across the lifespan. Canadian risk reduction strategies should prioritize targeting physical inactivity, hearing loss, obesity, and hypertension.

Health and Well-being of Family ('Ohana) Caregivers of Native Hawaiian and Pacific Islander Adults Living with Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias.

INTRODUCTION: We aimed to describe the health and well-being of family caregivers of Native Hawaiian and Pacific Islander (NHPI) adults living with Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRD), explore cultural values related to caregiving, and characterize barriers and facilitators to their health and well-being. METHODOLOGY: Caregivers of NHPIs living with ADRD were recruited from across the United States to complete a multimethod study including a survey followed by an interview about their health and well-being. RESULTS: Eleven participants completed surveys, six of whom completed an interview. Themes included caring as a community, lokahi (balance), and the importance of sleep, food, and physical activity. Cultural values included connection to cultural practices, kupuna (elders) as cultural knowledge holders, and the kuleana (responsibility) of caregiving. DISCUSSION: Caregiving for an NHPI adult living with ADRD occurs beyond the dyad, and is a matter of family and community. Culturally-based interventions offered through community and healthcare organizations may be critical to promoting caregiver health.

Stakeholder Consultation to Establish Research Priorities for Specialist Dementia Nursing in the United Kingdom.

INTRODUCTION: In the United Kingdom, there are a growing number of specialist dementia nurses called Admiral Nurses. Admiral Nurses, supported in their professional development and clinical supervision by the charity Dementia UK, work with families affected by dementia using a relationship-centred approach. Given the growing need for this type of support, Dementia UK is committed to research that will expand the evidence base for Admiral Nursing. This article describes a stakeholder consultation to identify research priorities for Admiral Nursing for the next 3 years (2023-2026). METHODS: We adopted a participatory approach using an adapted Nominal Group Technique and priority-setting workshop. All elements of the process were designed in consultation with a steering group comprising a range of stakeholders, including people with dementia, carers, Admiral Nurses, Dementia UK staff and researchers. Stakeholders were identified as those who were likely to be affected by or interested in the emerging research priorities. Nominal groups were held both face-to-face and online. A total of 144 people shared their research priorities. Data generated through each nominal group were thematically analysed and then ranked in order of priority. RESULTS: Four themes reflecting research priority areas were taken to a priority-setting workshop for consideration. This resulted in three research priorities for Admiral Nursing: (1) people with dementia who live alone and carers who provide support from a distance; (2) people living with young onset and rarer dementia and their families; and (3) people living with multiple health conditions alongside dementia, including mental health problems. Risk, diversity and the effectiveness of Admiral Nursing were strands that ran throughout these themes. CONCLUSIONS: We identified shared research priorities for Admiral Nursing using a rigorous, consensus-driven approach involving key stakeholders. These priorities reflect a desire to ensure that Admiral Nursing services reach the most vulnerable people living with dementia and their families and respond to the widening health and social care inequalities faced by this group. PATIENT AND PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: People with dementia and carers were involved in the design of this process as members of our steering group and through consultation on our initial plans with Dementia UK's Lived Experience Advisory Panel (LEAP). People living with dementia and carers also participated in consultation groups to share their views on research priorities. All stakeholders were invited to share feedback on the themes as part of the analysis and interpretation of the priorities, and a meeting was held with LEAP to discuss the emerging priorities.