Prevention of foot ulcers recurrence in patients with diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials for the development of the italian guidelines for the treatment of diabetic foot syndrome.

AIM: To compare the effectiveness of preventive interventions in reducing reccurrent diabetic foot ulcers. Meta-analysis (MA) was conducted to address clinical questions on this topic of the Italian guidelines on diabetic foot. METHODS: This MA includes randomized controlled trials evaluating the effectiveness of various preventive interventions, namely: treatment of pre-ulcerative foot lesions, structured educational programs, psychological interventions and the use of therapeutic footwear to relieve plantar pressure in people with diabetes mellitus and a history of previous ulcers. RESULTS: A total of 731 studies were identified and 14 were considered eligible for the analysis. We found that treatments of pre-ulcerative foot lesions did not provide any statistically significant effects (MH-OR: 0.84 [0.31, 2.33], p = 0.74, I2 = 38%). Conversely, structured educational programs were associated with a trend toward reduction of ulcer recurrence risk (MH-OR: 0.13 [0.01, 1.64], p = 0.10, I2 = 88%). No randomized controlled studies assessing the efficacy of psychological interventions have been retrieved. The use of therapeutic footwears can effectively reduce the risk of reulceration in diabetic patients with an history of previous DFU, in particular prefabricated rigid-soled therapeutic footwears showed a significant reduction of the risk of ulcer recurrence in comparison with semirigid soles (MH-OR: 0.17 [0.05, 0.57], p = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: The study provides low-certainty evidence that, among preventive strategies in patients with previous DFU, rigid-sole therapeutic footwear and structured education programs are capable of reducing the risk of foot re-ulceration.

Enhancing Outpatient Wound Care: Applying AI to Optimize Treatment of Patients with Diabetic Foot Syndrome - The EPWUF-KI Project.

Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a significant public health issue in Germany, affecting 8 million individuals, with projections suggesting a substantial increase in the following years. Diabetic Foot Syndrome (DFS), leading to mobility issues and limb amputations, challenging healthcare due to resource shortages and the need for specialized care. The EPWUF-KI project seeks to support outpatient caregivers by incorporating artificial intelligence (AI) into DFS wound care, focusing on optimizing treatment and automating documentation.

[Cold plasma in wound healing]. / Kaltplasma in der Wundheilung.

Even today, not all wounds can be healed. Treatment, which often takes many years, is a burden for patients and is very cost-intensive. Therefore, additional procedures such as cold plasma are becoming increasingly popular. Active components of cold plasma include electromagnetic radiation and free radicals. The active principle is based on, among other things, damage to bacterial cells and positive interaction with epithelial and endothelial cells. Angiogenesis and cellular oxygen metabolism are stimulated. The evidence base is still limited and heterogeneous, as some results are contradictory and comparability is difficult. However, new, well-designed studies have confirmed previous findings. In order to create a solid database, further studies are needed.

Assessment of potential genetic markers for diabetic foot ulcer among Moscow residents.

PURPOSE: Diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) is one of the most severe complications of type 2 diabetes, which is manifested in chronic skin ulcers of lower extremities. DFU treatment remains complex and expensive despite the availability of well-established protocols. Early prediction of potential DFU development at the onset of type 2 diabetes can greatly improve the aftermath of this complication. METHODS: To assess potential genetic markers for DFU, a group of diabetic patients from Moscow region with and without DFU was genotyped for a number of SNPs previously reported to be associated with the DFU. RESULTS: Obtained results did not confirm previously claimed association of rs1024611, rs3918242, rs2073618, rs1800629, rs4986790, rs179998, rs1963645 and rs11549465 (respectively, in MCP1, MMP9, TNFRSF11B, TNFα, TLR4, eNOS, NOS1AP and HIF1α genes) with the DFU. Surprisingly, the t allele of rs7903146 in the TCF7l2 gene known as one of the most prominent risk factors for type 2 diabetes has shown a protective effect on DFU with OR(95%) = 0.68(0.48-0.96). CONCLUSION: Non-replication of previously published SNP associations with DFU suggests that the role of genetic factors in the DFU onset is either highly variable in different populations or is not as significant as the role of non-genetic factors.

Non-coronary arterial outcomes in people with type 1 diabetes mellitus: a Swedish retrospective cohort study.

Background: Observational studies on long-term trends, risk factor association and importance are scarce for type 1 diabetes mellitus and peripheral arterial outcomes. We set out to investigate trends in non-coronary complications and their relationships with cardiovascular risk factors in persons with type 1 diabetes mellitus compared to matched controls. Methods: 34,263 persons with type 1 diabetes mellitus from the Swedish National Diabetes Register and 164,063 matched controls were included. Incidence rates of extracranial large artery disease, aortic aneurysm, aortic dissection, lower extremity artery disease, and diabetic foot syndrome were analyzed using standardized incidence rates and Cox regression. Findings: Between 2001 and 2019, type 1 diabetes mellitus incidence rates per 100,000 person-years were as follows: extracranial large artery disease 296.5-84.3, aortic aneurysm 0-9.2, aortic dissection remained at 0, lower extremity artery disease 456.6-311.1, and diabetic foot disease 814.7-77.6. Persons with type 1 diabetes mellitus with cardiometabolic risk factors at target range did not exhibit excess risk of extracranial large artery disease [HR 0.83 (95% CI, 0.20-3.36)] or lower extremity artery disease [HR 0.94 (95% CI, 0.30-2.93)], compared to controls. Persons with type 1 diabetes with all risk factors at baseline, had substantially elevated risk for diabetic foot disease [HR 29.44 (95% CI, 3.83-226.04)], compared to persons with type 1 diabetes with no risk factors. Persons with type 1 diabetes mellitus continued to display a lower risk for aortic aneurysm, even with three cardiovascular risk factors at baseline [HR 0.31 (95% CI, 0.15-0.67)]. Relative importance analyses demonstrated that education, glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), duration of diabetes and lipids explained 54% of extracranial large artery disease, while HbA1c, smoking and systolic blood pressure explained 50% of lower extremity artery disease and HbA1c alone contributed to 41% of diabetic foot disease. Income, duration of diabetes and body mass index explained 66% of the contribution to aortic aneurysm. Interpretation: Peripheral arterial complications decreased in persons with type 1 diabetes mellitus, except for aortic aneurysm which remained low. Besides glycemic control, traditional cardiovascular risk factors were associated with incident outcomes. Risk of these outcomes increased with additional risk factors present. Persons with type 1 diabetes mellitus exhibited a lower risk of aortic aneurysm compared to controls, despite presence of cardiovascular risk factors. Funding: Swedish Governmental and the county support of research and education of doctors, the Swedish Heart and Lung Foundation, Sweden and Åke-Wibergs grant.

Higher Prevalence of Cancer in Patients with Diabetic Foot Syndrome.

Background: Diabetes mellitus (DM) is associated with a higher prevalence of many forms of cancer. Diabetic foot syndrome (DFS) is associated with higher risk of lower limb amputation and mortality not all explainable with a cardiovascular profile at greater risk compared with DM patients without DFS. DFS could be associated with an increasing cancer incidence. To explore a possible link between DFS and cancer, comparing two cohorts of patients (DFS+ and DFS-) with a cohort of superimposable non-DM controls. Methods: We retrospectively analysed the databases of our department for all consecutive patients admitted between January 2019 and December 2021, selecting all DM pts, and sorting DFS+ pts, admitted for foot complications, from DFS- ones, admitted for other reasons. Cases of pancreatic cancer as well as cancer-related admissions were excluded. Patients were compared to non-DM patients admitted for non-oncological medical problems. The primary endpoint was to compare the prevalence of cancer among the groups, while the secondary endpoint was to look for predictors for cancer in the groups studied. Results: A cohort of 445 consecutive DM inpatients (222 DFS+ and 223 DFS-) and 255 controls were studied. Cancer prevalence in DFS+ group was significantly higher than in DFS- (p = 0.008) and controls (p = 0.031), while no differences were observed between DFS- and the controls. Univariate regression analysis showed a significant association between cancer and DFS (p = 0.007), age at admission (p ≤ 0.001), years of diabetes (p = 0.017) and haemoglobin concentration [Hb] (p = 0.030). In the multivariate regression analysis with DFS, age at admission and [Hb], only DFS (p = 0.021) and age at admission (p ≤ 0.001) persisted as independent factors associated with cancer. Conclusions: A higher prevalence of cancer in DFS+ patients than in DFS- patients and non-diabetic controls is reported. DFS and age can both be considered independent predictors of cancer in patients with DM.

Peripheral Arterial Disease and the Diabetic Foot Syndrome: Neuropathy Makes the Difference! A Narrative Review.

Background: In vascular medicine, peripheral arterial disease (PAD) and diabetic foot syndrome (DFS) are often considered synonymous with respect to the need for revascularization. In PAD patients, clinical symptoms reflect the degree of atherosclerotic disease, since peripheral innervation, including pain sensation, is not usually compromised. In DFS patients, however, symptoms of relevant foot ischemia are often absent and progression of ischemia goes unnoticed owing to diabetic polyneuropathy, the loss of nociception being the main trigger for foot ulcers. This review analyzes the fundamental differences between PAD and DFS against the background of polyneuropathy. Methods: The literature research for the 2014 revision of the German evidence-based S3-PAD-guidelines was extended to 2023. Results: Vascular examination is imperative for both, PAD and DFS. Stage-dependent revascularization is of utmost importance in PAD patients, especially those suffering from critical limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI). Successful therapy of DFS goes further, including infection and metabolic control, wound management, offloading the foot and lifelong prophylaxis in the course of a multidisciplinary treatment concept. Revascularization is not needed in all cases of DFS. Conclusions: There are fundamental differences between PAD and DFS with respect to pathophysiology, the anatomical distribution of arterial occlusive processes, the clinical symptoms, the value of diagnostic tools such as the ankle-brachial index, and classification. Also, therapeutic concepts differ substantially between the two patient populations.

Can acupuncture increase microcirculation in peripheral artery disease and diabetic foot syndrome? - a pilot study.

Background: Globally, diabetes mellitus (DM) and peripheral artery disease (PAD) have an increasing incidence and a high prevalence and are both associated with high morbidity and complication rates, e.g., as chronic non-healing peripheral ulcers. Impaired macro- and microcirculation and peripheral neuropathy lead to an increased risk of foot ulcers and infections. These complications are difficult to treat, have a high risk of becoming chronic and often lead to lower limb amputation. The aim of this planned study was to investigate the potential effects of acupuncture on improving microcirculation in patients with Diabetic Foot Syndrome (DFS) and PAD. Materials and methods: In 18 patients with chronic non-healing peripheral ulcers and diagnosed DM or PAD, data on 8 microcirculatory parameters were collected simultaneously on intact skin close to the wound margin. Microcirculation was assessed using an O2C device combining laser Doppler shift and white light spectroscopy (LEA Medizintechnik GmbH, Giessen, Germany). Unilateral and bilateral acupuncture was performed on the connecting line between acupuncture points Stomach 14 and Stomach 15. Results: After unilateral acupuncture (ipsilateral to the wound side), a statistically significant improvement in 7 out of 8 microcirculatory parameters was demonstrated compared to baseline measurements before acupuncture. After bilateral acupuncture, there was an additional improvement and statistical significance in all parameters in both DFS and PAD patients. Discussion: These results show an improvement in the microcirculation and peripheral blood flow at the edges of the wound. As impaired micro- and macrocirculation is considered to be a critical prognostic factor for the healing of a peripheral lesion, the intervention could have a positive impact on the healing of (chronic) peripheral wounds.

Sensor-Assisted Wound Therapy in Plantar Diabetic Foot Ulcer Treatment: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

BACKGROUND: Offloading is the cornerstone of treatment of plantar diabetic foot ulcers. It limits mobility with consequent psychological and cardiovascular side effects, and if devices are removed, healing is delayed. METHODS: We developed three non-removable techniques with increasing offloading potential (multilayer felt sole, felt-fiberglass sole, or total contact casts with ventral windows) and sensors built within. Smartwatch and web apps displayed pressure, temperature, humidity, and steps. They alerted patients, staff, and a telemedicine center when pressure limits (125 kPa) were exceeded. Patients were advised to walk as much as they had done before the ulcer episode. To evaluate the potential of this intervention, we enrolled 20 ambulatory patients in a randomized clinical trial. The control group used the same offloading and monitoring system, but neither patients nor therapists received any information or warnings. RESULTS: Three patients withdrew consent. The median time to healing of ulcers was significantly shorter in the intervention group compared with controls, 40.5 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 28-not applicable [NA]) versus 266.0 (95% CI = 179-NA) days (P = .037), and increasing ulcer area was observed less frequently during study visits (7.9% vs 29.7%, P = .033). A reduction of wound area by 50% was reached at a median of 10.2 (95% CI = 7.25-NA) versus 19.1 (95% CI = 13.36-NA) days (P = .2). Participants walked an average of 1875 (SD = 1590) steps per day in intervention group and 1806 (SD = 1391) in the control group. CONCLUSIONS: Sensor-assisted wound therapy may allow rapid closure of plantar foot ulcers while maintaining patient's mobility during ulcer therapy.

Investigating the joint application of negative pressure wound treatment and tissue therapy for chronic wounds in patients with diabetes.

This study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of combined negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) and human amniotic membrane in patients with chronic wounds associated with diabetes. A total of five patients with type 2 diabetes, including ischemic and mixed forms of diabetic foot syndrome, presenting with ischemic wounds of the lower extremities were included in this study. Patients with uncorrected limb ischemia were excluded. The treatment protocol included diabetes compensation (treatment with fractional insulin therapy), anticoagulant, metabolic therapy and angiotropic therapy, physical treatment methods, osteoporosis therapy with calcium preparations, and wound-specific interventions. The primary treatment approach involved the application of a vacuum bandage to the transplanted human amniotic membrane, which improved the adaptation of the flap to the wound surface, allowed the removal of excess wound exudate, and stimulated angiogenesis and reparative properties. The combined approach of NPWT and biotherapy was a safe and effective cure for diabetic wounds, promoting faster wound healing, reducing the need for autodermoplasty, and possibly reducing the necessity for high-level amputations.

Complementary Gene Therapy after Revascularization with the Saphenous Vein in Diabetic Foot Syndrome.

Diabetic foot syndrome (DFS) is one of the most serious macroangiopathic complications of diabetes. The primary treatment option is revascularization, but complementary therapies are still being sought. The study group consisted of 18 patients diagnosed with ischemic ulcerative and necrotic lesions in DFS. Patients underwent revascularization procedures and, due to unsatisfactory healing of the lesions, were randomly allocated to two groups: a group in which bicistronic VEGF165/HGF plasmid was administered and a control group in which saline placebo was administered. Before gene therapy administration and after 7, 30, 90, and 180 days, color duplex ultrasonography (CDU) was performed, the ankle-brachial index (ABI) and transcutaneous oxygen pressure (TcPO2) were measured, and DFS changes were described and documented photographically. In the gene therapy group, four out of eight patients (50%) healed their DFS lesions before 12 weeks. During this time, the ABI increased by an average of 0.25 and TcPO2 by 30.4 mmHg. In the control group, healing of the lesions by week 12 occurred in six out of nine patients (66.67%), and the ABI increased by an average of 0.14 and TcPO2 by 27.1 mmHg. One major amputation occurred in each group. Gene therapy may be an attractive option for complementary treatment in DFS.

Angiogenic and Microvascular Status Alterations after Endovascular Revascularization of Lower Limb Arteries among Patients with Diabetic Foot Syndrome: A Prospective 12-Month Follow-Up Study.

Peripheral arterial disease (PAD)-induced ischemia is an important component of diabetic foot syndrome (DFS). The results of revascularization of the lower extremity arteries (including percutaneous transluminal angioplasty [PTA]) do not always give satisfactory long-term results, which is due to many factors. The aim of the study was to investigate the alterations in selected circulating angiogenic factors and microcirculation parameters in 41 patients with DFS following PTA and analyze their relationships with clinical outcomes during 1-year follow-up. Our study revealed a general decrease in pro-angiogenic factor levels after PTA and their subsequent stabilization during subsequent observation. The results indicated a significant association between plasma circulating FGF-2 level and poor outcomes (including the incidence of restenosis/reocclusion of treated arteries) during 12 months of observation. The perioperative changes in FGF-2 showed a significant association with LDF alterations after PTA. Follow-up 1-3 months post-intervention showed a tendency towards elevated TcpO2, VEGF-A, and VEGF-R2 levels in patients free from adverse events. These results may provide a basis for further research on the potential use of selected circulating angiogenic factors for monitoring the treatment of patients with DFS following PTA.

Development of the Italian clinical practice guidelines for the treatment of diabetic foot syndrome: design and methodological aspects.

AIMS: Diabetic foot syndrome (DFS) and its complications are a growing public health concern. The Italian Society of Diabetology (SID) and the Italian Association of Clinical Diabetologists (AMD), in collaboration with other scientific societies, will develop the first Italian guidelines for the treatment of DFS. METHODS: The creation of SID/AMD Guidelines is based on an extended work made by 19 panelists and 12 members of the Evidence Review Team. Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) methodology has been used to decide aims, reference population, and target health professionals. Clinical questions have been created using PICO (Patient, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome) conceptual framework. The definition of questions has been performed using a two-step web-based Delphi methodology, a structured technique aimed at obtaining by repeated rounds of questionnaires a consensus opinion from a panel of experts in areas wherein evidence is scarce or conflicting, and opinion is important. RESULTS: The mean age of panelists (26.3% women) was 53.7 ± 10.6 years. The panel proposed 34 questions. A consensus was immediately reached for all the proposed questions, 32 were approved and 2 were rejected. CONCLUSIONS: The areas covered by clinical questions included diagnosis of ischemia and infection, treatment of ischemic, neuropathic, and infected ulcers, prevention of foot ulceration, organization and education issues, and surgical management. The PICO presented in this paper are designed to provide indications for healthcare professionals in charge of diabetic foot treatment and prevention, primarily based on clinical needs of people with diabetic foot syndrome and considering the existing organization of health care.

Risk Factors for Failure After Surgery in Patients With Diabetic Foot Syndrome.

Background: In the present study, we aimed to identify risk factors for failure (defined as reoperation within 60 days) after debridement or amputation at the lower extremity in patients with diabetic foot syndrome and to develop a model using the significant risk factors to predict the success rate at different levels of amputation. Methods: Between September 2012 and November 2016, we performed a prospective observational cohort study of 174 surgeries in 105 patients with diabetic foot syndrome. In all patients, debridement or the level of amputation, need for reoperation, time to reoperation, and potential risk factors were assessed. A cox regression analysis, dependent on the level of amputation, with the endpoint reoperation within 60 days defined as failure and a predictive model for the significant risk factors were conducted. Results: We identified the following 5 independent risk factors: More than 1 ulcer (hazard ratio [HR] 3.8), peripheral artery disease (PAD, HR 3.1), C-reactive protein >100 mg/L (HR 2.9), diabetic peripheral neuropathy (HR 2.9), and nonpalpable foot pulses (HR 2.7) are the 5 independent risk factors for failure, which were identified. Patients with no or 1 risk factor have a high success rate independent of the level of amputation. A patient with up to 2 risk factors undergoing debridement will achieve a success rate of <60%. However, a patient with 3 risk factors undergoing debridement will need further surgery in >80%. In patients with 4 risk factors a transmetatarsal amputation and in patients with 5 risk factors a lower leg amputation is needed for a success rate >50%. Conclusion: Reoperation for diabetic foot syndrome occurs in 1 of 4 patients. Risk factors include presence of more than 1 ulcer, PAD, CRP > 100, peripheral neuropathy, and nonpalpable foot pulses. The more risk factors are present, the lower the success rate at a certain level of amputation. Level of Evidence: Level II, prospective observational cohort study.

Circulating Angiogenic Factors and Ischemic Diabetic Foot Syndrome Advancement-A Pilot Study.

Despite clear evidence of inadequate angiogenesis in ischemic diabetic foot syndrome (DFS) pathogenesis, angiogenic factor level changes in patients with ischemic DFS remain inconsistent. This study aimed to assess circulating angiogenic factors concerning ischemic DFS advancement and describe their relationships with patients' clinical characteristics, microvascular parameters, and diabetic control. The study included 41 patients with ischemic DFS (67.3 (8.84) years; 82.9% males). Angiogenic processes were assessed by identifying circulating concentrations of five pro- and two anti-angiogenic factors. We found that penetrating ulcers were related to a significantly higher FGF-2 level (8.86 (5.29) vs. 5.23 (4.17) pg/mL, p = 0.02). Moreover, plasma FGF-2 showed a significant correlation with the SINBAD score (r = 0.32, p = 0.04), platelet count (r = 0.43, p < 0.01), white cell count (r = 0.42, p < 0.01), and age (r = -0.35, p = 0.03). We did not observe any significant linear relationship between the studied biomarkers and microcirculatory parameters, nor for glycemic control. In a univariate analysis using logistic regression, an increase in plasma FGF-2 was tied to greater odds of high-grade ulcers (OR 1.16; 95% CI 1.02-1.38, p = 0.043). This suggests that circulating FGF-2 may serve as a potential biomarker for predicting DFU advancement and progression. It is necessary to conduct further studies with follow-up observations to confirm this hypothesis.

Papel de la neuropatía diabética en la aparición y desarrollo del síndrome del pie diabético / Role of Diabetic Neuropathy in the Onset and Development of Diabetic Foot Syndrome

Introducción: La neuropatía diabética es la complicación más frecuente de la diabetes mellitus y una de sus posibles consecuencias es el síndrome del pie diabético. Los médicos del primer nivel de atención deben conocer el comportamiento clínico de la neuropatía diabética y, sobre todo, como influye en la aparición y desarrollo del síndrome del pie diabético. Objetivo: Describir el papel de la neuropatía diabética en la aparición y desarrollo del síndrome del pie diabético. Métodos: Para la obtención de la información se utilizaron como motores de búsqueda de información científica los correspondientes a Scielo, Pubmed, y Google Académico. Se usaron como palabras clave: diabetes mellitus; neuropatía diabética; pie diabético; síndrome de pie diabético; úlcera de pie diabético; ataque de pie diabético. Se evaluaron diferentes trabajos de revisión, investigación y páginas web, y se excluyeron los artículos que tuvieran más de 10 años de publicados, en idiomas diferentes al español, portugués e inglés y que no se refirieran al tema de estudio a través del título. Esto permitió la cita de 45 referencias bibliográficas. Conclusiones: La neuropatía diabética constituye el principal factor de riesgo en la aparición y desarrollo del síndrome del pie diabético, sobre todo cuando se asocia a artropatía (defectos podálicos), enfermedad vascular periférica y/o sepsis. El control de la glucemia, la detección temprana del pie de riesgo y el cuidado preventivo de los miembros inferiores, repercutirá favorablemente en la salud y bienestar del paciente(AU)

Introduction: Diabetic neuropathy is the most frequent complication of diabetes mellitus and one of its possible consequences is diabetic foot syndrome. First level of care physicians should know the clinical behavior of diabetic neuropathy and, above all, how it influences the appearance and development of diabetic foot syndrome. Objective: To describe the role of diabetic neuropathy in the appearance and development of diabetic foot syndrome. Methods: To obtain the information, SciELO, PubMed and Google Scholar were used as search engines for scientific information. The keywords used were: diabetes mellitus; diabetic neuropathy; diabetic foot; diabetic foot syndrome; diabetic foot ulcer; diabetic foot attack. Different review papers, research papers and web pages were evaluated and articles that were more than 10 years old and published in languages other than Spanish, Portuguese and English and that did not refer to the subject of the study through the title were excluded. This allowed the citation of 45 bibliographic references. Conclusions: Diabetic neuropathy constitutes the main risk factor in the appearance and development of diabetic foot syndrome, especially when associated with arthropathy (foot defects), peripheral vascular disease and/or sepsis. Glycemic control, early detection of the foot at risk and preventive care of the lower limbs will have a favorable impact on the patient's health and well-being(AU)

Epidemiology and Outcome of Nontraumatic Lower Limb Amputations.

Background: In order to create a solid evidence base for the development of improved management methods, this study was performed to describe the epidemiology and outcome of nontraumatic lower limb amputations (LLAs). Methods: This descriptive case series was conducted over a period of 4 years. It included all patients of both sexes and all ages who underwent LLAs for nontraumatic indications. Results: There were a total of 217 patients with 136 (62.67%) men and 81(37.32%) women. The age range was 7 to 71 years, with a mean of 54.25 ± 11.49 years. The most common indication for amputation (41.47%) was diabetic foot gangrene. The most common level of amputation (48.29%) was below knee amputation. Conclusion: Patients with diabetic foot gangrene, malignant tumors, and chronic neuropathic ulcers with osteomyelitis constituted the bulk of the amputees. Diabetes mellitus, obesity, and hypertension were the commonest comorbidities identified among them. Public awareness and education would ensure prompt and early health seeking at the appropriate time and help to prevent the need for major amputations in many instances. The amputees' improved reintegration into society and ability to become contributing members of society would be ensured by the provision of vigorous rehabilitation.

Diabetic foot infection - diagnosis and treatment.

Diabetic foot (DF) is one of the most serious complications of diabetes, leading to high morbidity and mortality in patients with diabetes, significantly affecting their quality of life and placing a huge burden on the healthcare system. Diabetic foot infection (DFI) is a major factor in the non-healing of diabetic ulcerations of the lower limbs, increases the number of hospital admissions, prolongs their duration and is a frequent cause of increased number of amputations. The most serious form of foot infection is osteomyelitis. Management of infection in SDN includes proper diagnosis, including obtaining appropriate specimens for culture, indication of rational antimicrobial therapy or early surgical intervention, and provision of all other necessary wound care and overall patient care to prevent recurrence of DFI.