Potential therapeutic option for EGFR-mutant small cell lung cancer transformation: a case report and literature review.

Transformation from non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) to small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is rare and is associated with poor prognosis. However, the standard treatment protocols for patients with SCLC transformation remain unknown. Here, we report the case of a patient with advanced EGFR exon 19 deletion (19del) NSCLC who underwent SCLC transformation during targeted therapy. Biopsies and genetic testing were performed to adjust treatment regimens accordingly. The patient responded favorably to a combined treatment regimen comprising etoposide plus cisplatin chemotherapy and adebrelimab plus osimertinib. This case highlights the critical importance of acknowledging tumor heterogeneity in clinical decision-making and identifying potentially effective treatment options for patients with SCLC transformation. Additionally, we reviewed cases of the transformation of NSCLC to SCLC from 2017 to 2023.

eHSP90α in front-line therapy in EGFR exon 19 deletion and 21 Leu858Arg mutations in advanced lung adenocarcinoma.

PURPOSE: Extracellular heat shock protein 90 AA1(eHSP90α) is intricately linked to tumor progression and prognosis. This study aimed to investigate the difference in the value of eHSP90α in post-treatment response assessment and prognosis prediction between exon 19 deletion(19DEL) and exon 21 Leu858Arg(L858R) mutation types in lung adenocarcinoma(LUAD). METHODS: We analyzed the relationship between the expression of eHSP90α and clinicopathological features in 89 patients with L858R mutation and 196 patients with 19DEL mutation in LUAD. The Kaplan-Meier survival curve was used to determine their respective cut-off values and analyze the relationship between eHSP90α expression and the survival time of the two mutation types. The area under the curve (AUC) was used to evaluate the diagnostic performance of biomarkers. Then, the prognostic model was developed using the univariate-Cox multivariate-Cox and LASSO-multivariate logistic methods. RESULTS: In LUAD patients, eHSP90α was positively correlated with carcinoembryonic antigen(CEA), carbohydrate antigen 125(CA125), and carbohydrate antigen 153(CA153). The truncated values of eHSP90α in L858R and 19DEL patients were 44.5 ng/mL and 40.8 ng/mL, respectively. Among L858R patients, eHSP90α had the best diagnostic performance (AUC = 0.765), and higher eHSP90α and T helper cells(Th cells) expression were significantly related to shorter overall survival(OS) and worse treatment response. Also, high eHSP90a expression and short progression-free survival(PFS) were significantly correlated. Among 19DEL patients, CEA had the best diagnostic efficacy (AUC = 0.734), and CEA and Th cells were independent prognostic factors that predicted shorter OS. Furthermore, high CA125 was significantly associated with short PFS and poor curative effect. CONCLUSIONS: eHSP90α has a better prognostic value in LUAD L858R patients than 19DEL, which provides a new idea for clinical diagnosis and treatment.

Prognostic implications of combining EGFR-TKIs and radiotherapy in Stage IV lung adenocarcinoma with 19-Del or 21-L858R mutations: A real-world study.

OBJECTIVE: To elucidate the potential benefits of combining radiotherapy and epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) for individuals with Stage IV lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) harboring either exon 19 deletion (19-Del) or exon 21 L858R mutation (21-L858R). METHODS: In this real-world retrospective study, 177 individuals with Stage IV LUAD who underwent EGFR-TKIs and radiotherapy at Shandong Cancer Hospital from June 2012 to August 2017 were included. The main focus of this real-world study was overall survival (OS). RESULTS: The clinical characteristics of patients with Stage IV LUAD harboring 19-Del were similar to those harboring 21-L858R (p > 0.05). Overall, the patients had a median OS (mOS) of 32.0 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 28.6-35.5). Subsequently, multivariate analysis indicated that both EGFR mutations and thoracic radiotherapy were independent predictors of OS (p = 0.001 and 0.013). Furthermore, subgroup analysis highlighted a longer OS for the 19-Del group compared to the 21-L858R group, especially when EGFR-TKIs were combined with bone metastasis or thoracic radiotherapy (mOS: 34.7 vs. 25.1 months and 51.0 vs. 29.6 months; p = 0.0056 and 0.0013, respectively). However, no significant differences were found in OS when considering patients who underwent brain metastasis radiotherapy (mOS: 34.7 vs. 25.1 months; p = 0.088). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with Stage IV LUAD harboring 19-Del experience a notably prolonged OS following combined therapy with EGFR-TKIs and radiotherapy, while this OS benefit is observed despite the absence of substantial differences in the clinical characteristics between the 19-Del and 21-L858R groups.

Clinical utility of the Oncomine Dx Target Test multi-CDx system and the possibility of utilizing those original sequence data.

BACKGROUND: Companion diagnostic tests play a crucial role in guiding treatment decisions for patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The Oncomine Dx Target Test (ODxTT) Multi-CDx System has emerged as a prominent companion diagnostic method. However, its efficacy in detecting driver gene mutations, particularly rare mutations, warrants investigation. AIMS: This study aimed to assess the performance of the ODxTT in detecting driver gene mutations in NSCLC patients. Specifically, we aimed to evaluate its sensitivity in detecting epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations, a key determinant of treatment selection in NSCLC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of NSCLC patients who underwent testing with the ODxTT at Keio University Hospital between May 2020 and March 2022. Patient samples were subjected to both DNA and RNA tests. Driver gene mutation status was assessed, and instances of missed mutations were meticulously examined. RESULTS: Of the 90 patients, five had nucleic acid quality problems, while 85 underwent both DNA and RNA tests. Driver gene mutations were detected in 56/90 (62.2%) patients. Of the 34 patient specimens, driver mutations were not detected using the ODxTT; however, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations were detected using polymerase chain reaction-based testing in two patients, and a KRAS mutation was detected by careful examination of the sequence data obtained using the ODxTT in one patient. For the above three cases, carefully examining the gene sequence information obtained using the ODxTT could identify driver mutations that were not mentioned in the returned test results. Additionally, we confirmed comparable instances of overlook results for EGFR mutations in the dataset from South Korea, implying that this type of oversight could occur in other countries using the ODxTT. EGFR mutation was missed in ODxTT in Japan (6.3%, 2/32), South Korea (2.0%, 1/49), and overall (3.7%, 3/81). CONCLUSION: Even if sufficient tumor samples are obtained, rare EGFR mutations (which are excluded from the ODxTT's genetic mutation list) might not be detected using the current ODxTT system due to the program used for sequence analysis. However, such rare EGFR mutations can still be accurately detected on ODxTT's sequence data using next-generation sequencing.

RELAY, Erlotinib Plus Ramucirumab in Untreated, EGFR-Mutated, Metastatic NSCLC: Outcomes by EGFR Exon 19 Deletion Variants.

Introduction: EGFR gene mutations are drivers of NSCLC. The RELAY double-blind, placebo (PBO)-controlled phase 3 study revealed superior progression-free survival (PFS) for ramucirumab plus erlotinib (RAM + ERL) versus PBO (PBO + ERL) in patients with untreated advanced NSCLC and an EGFR-activating mutation. This exploratory analysis evaluated potential associations between EGFR exon 19 deletion (ex19del) variants and clinical outcomes. Methods: Patients (N = 449) were randomized (1:1) to RAM plus ERL or PBO plus ERL. Plasma samples were collected at baseline, on treatment, and at 30-day post-study treatment discontinuation follow-up. Baseline and treatment-emergent gene alterations were investigated by Guardant360 next-generation sequencing. Patients with a valid baseline plasma sample and ex19del were included (RAM + ERL, n = 62; PBO + ERL, n = 72). Results: The most common ex19del variant was E746_A750del (67.2%); EGFR E746 deletions (E746del) occurred more frequently than L747 deletions (74.6% versus 25.4%, respectively). TP53 mutations were the most frequently co-occurring baseline gene alterations. With treatment arms combined, median PFS was 18.0 months versus 12.5 months for patients with uncommon (non-E746_A750del, n = 44) versus common (E746_A750del, n = 90) ex19del variants (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.657 [95% confidence interval or CI:1.044-2.630]). Median PFS was longer with RAM plus ERL versus PBO plus ERL for patients with the common (15.2 versus 9.9 mo; HR = 0.564 [95% CI: 0.344-0.926]) and E746del (15.4 versus 9.9 mo; HR = 0.587 [95% CI: 0.363-0.951]) variants. Treatment-emergent post-progression EGFR T790M rates were higher in the common versus uncommon and E746del versus L747 deletion subgroups. Conclusions: RAM plus ERL provides benefit and improves treatment outcomes for patients with metastatic NSCLC with EGFR ex19del variants.

Real world treatment patterns, healthcare resource use and costs in patients with advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer by EGFR mutation type.

AIMS: This study described treatment patterns, healthcare resource utilization (HRU) and costs among advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (a/mNSCLC) patients with different epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation types. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study leveraged NeoGenomics NeoNucleus linked with IQVIA PharMetrics Plus between 01 January 2016 to 30 April 2021 (study period). Patients with evidence of a/mNSCLC between 01 July 2016 to 31 March 2021 (selection window) with EGFR test results indicating exon 19 deletion (exon19del), exon 21 L858R (L858R), or exon 20 insertion (exon20i) mutations were included; date of first observed evidence of a/mNSCLC was the index date. Treatment patterns, all-cause HRU and costs during ≥1 month follow-up were reported for each cohort (exon19del, L858R, and exon20i). RESULTS: A total of 106 exon19del, 75 L858R, and 13 exon20i patients met the study criteria. The prevalence of hospitalization was highest in the exon20i cohort (76.9%), followed by L858R (62.7%) and exon19del (55.7%) cohorts. A higher proportion of patients had evidence of hospice/end-of-life care in the exon20i (30.8%) and L858R (29.3%) cohorts relative to the exon19del cohort (22.6%). The exon20i cohort had higher median total healthcare costs per patient per month ($27,069) relative to exon19del ($17,482) and L858R ($17,763). EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) were the most frequently observed treatment type for exon19del and L858R cohorts, while chemotherapy was the most observed treatment in exon20i cohort. LIMITATIONS: The sample size for the study cohorts was small, thus no statistical comparisons were conducted. CONCLUSIONS: This is one of the first real-world studies to describe HRU and costs among a/mNSCLC patients by specific EGFR mutation type. HRU and costs varied between EGFR mutation types and were highest among exon20i cohort, potentially reflecting higher disease burden and unmet need among patients with this mutation.

Patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in an advanced or metastatic stage (a/mNSCLC) where cancer has spread to other parts of the body have high chance of dying within five years. Treatment and management of a/mNSCLC also incurs significant healthcare resource utilization (HRU) and costs. Patients with a/mNSCLC may have their epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene mutated with different variations. Our study described what a/mNSCLC patients were treated with, their HRU and healthcare costs separately for the following three types of EGFR mutations: exon 19 deletion (exon19del), exon 21 L858R (L858R), or exon 20 insertion (exon20i). Our study found that patients with exon19del or L858R mutation were commonly treated with EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), while exon20i patients were mostly treated with chemotherapy due to lack of targeted treatment for exon20i during the time when the study was conducted. HRU and healthcare costs were highest for patients with exon20i, which shows that patients with exon20i face high burden and have a need for new treatment options.

Differential efficacy of tyrosine kinase inhibitors according to the types of EGFR mutations and agents in non-small cell lung cancer: a real-world study.

BACKGROUND: Both first and second-generation EGFR-TKIs are recommended in advanced NSCLC with common EGFR mutations. However, there are few data on the difference in efficacy of EGFR-TKIs based on the type of EGFR mutation and agents. METHODS: This retrospective real-world study evaluated the outcomes and clinicopathologic characteristics, including the type of EGFR mutations, of 237 advanced NSCLC patients treated with first- or second-generation (afatinib) EGFR-TKIs as first-line therapy. RESULTS: The median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of all patients were 11 months (M) and 25M, respectively. In the univariate analysis, patients with exon 19 deletion (del) (n=130) had significantly longer median OS compared to those with other mutations (L858R: 84, others: 23) (30 vs. 22 M, p=0.047), without a difference in PFS (p=0.138). Patients treated with afatinib (n=60) showed significantly longer median OS compared to those treated with first-generation TKIs (gefitinib: 159, erlotinib: 18) (30 vs. 23 M, p=0.037), without a difference in PFS (p=0.179). In patients with exon 19 del, there was no significant difference in median PFS (p=0.868) or OS (p=0.361) between patients treated with afatinib and those treated with first-generation TKIs, while significantly better PFS (p=0.042) and trend in OS (p=0.069) were observed in patients receiving afatinib in other mutations. Exon 19 del was independently associated with favorable OS (p=0.028), while age >70 years (p=0.017), ECOG performance status ≥2 (p=0.001), primary metastatic disease (p=0.007), and synchronous brain metastasis (p=0.026) were independent prognostic factors of poor OS. CONCLUSIONS: The EGFR exon 19 del was associated with favorable OS in advanced NSCLC patients receiving first-line EGFR-TKIs. Moreover, in patients with exon 19 del, first-generation TKIs seem to be a reasonable treatment option if osimertinib is unavailable.

Non-small cell lung cancer cells with uncommon EGFR exon 19delins variants respond poorly to third-generation EGFR inhibitors.

BACKGROUND: This study compared the clinical efficacy of first-, second-, and third-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in previously untreated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients harboring uncommon epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) exon 19delins variants. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the clinical outcomes of NSCLC patients with EGFR exon 19delins mutations who were treated with third- and first-generation EGFR TKIs. In vitro and in vivo studies were conducted to verify the sensitivity of these mutations to distinct generations of TKIs. Molecular simulation was used to investigate the structural characteristics of the EGFR mutant molecules. RESULTS: In a multicenter cohort of 1,526 patients, 37 (2.4 %) had uncommon EGFR 19delins mutations. Twenty-four patients were treated with first-generation EGFR TKIs, and third-generation TKIs were administered to ten patients as frontline therapy. Patients carrying EGFR exon 19delins mutations who were given third-generation TKIs exhibited comparatively shorter progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in relation to those who received first-generation EGFR inhibitors; median PFS: 6.9 months vs. 19.1 months (p < 0.001), Median OS: 19.1 months vs. 32.6 months (p < 0.001). In vivo and in vitro studies revealed that uncommon EGFR 19delins variants exhibit limited sensitivity to third-generation EGFR inhibitors in contrast to first- and second-generation EGFR inhibitors. The molecular binding affinity of third-generation EGFR TKIs toward uncommon EGFR 19delins mutations was less than that of first- and second-generation EGFR inhibitors. CONCLUSIONS: Uncommon EGFR 19delins variants respond poorly to third-generation EGFR inhibitors in NSCLC. Uncommon EGFR 19delins mutations may serve as an unfavorable predictive factor for the efficacy of third-generation EGFR TKI therapy, offering potential guidance for future clinical decision-making.

Clinical outcomes of advanced NSCLC patients with different EGFR exon 19 deletion subtypes treated with first-line tyrosine kinase inhibitors: A single-center ambispective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Clinical significance of various subtypes of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) exon 19 deletion (ex19del) mutation in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains unclear. METHODS: We analyzed EGFR ex19del subtypes in NSCLC patients receiving first-line tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy at our center (January 2018-June 2022) and correlated them with median progression-free survival (mPFS) and median overall survival (mOS). RESULTS: We identified 17 different EGFR ex19del variants in 101 patients. Between the classic (E746_A750del, 64.4%) and nonclassic groups (the rest variants), no significant difference was observed in mPFS (13.5 vs. 19.3 months, p = 0.18) or mOS (44.1 vs. 77.0 months, p = 0.06). mPFS showed no significant difference between ex19del subgroups classified based on the presence of insertion (ex19delins), starting position or length of deletion. However, patients with ex19delins starting at E746 showed longer mPFS than the others (29.7 vs. 12.5 months, p = 0.04), and patients with ex19del of 15 nucleotides had shorter mOS than the others (44.1 vs. 77.0 months, p = 0.03). In multivariate analysis, ex19delins independently predicted a better PFS (HR = 0.311, p = 0.03); however, 15 nucleotide deletion was no longer associated with OS (HR = 0.181, p = 0.11). Secondary T790M mutation incidence was significantly higher in the ex19del subgroup starting at E746 than the others (64.7% vs. 30.8%, p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Our study revealed potential differences in TKI efficacy, resistance mechanism, and prognosis of various EGFR ex19del subtypes in NSCLC, underscoring the need for precise selection of first-line therapy.

Rechallenge with EGFR-TKI after failure of immunotherapy is considered an effective treatment for advanced lung adenocarcinoma patients with EGFR exon 19 deletion: a case report.

In advanced lung adenocarcinoma patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation, epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) have an excellent and long-lasting therapeutic response; however, virtually all patients eventually develop drug resistance and experience disease progression. The use of immunotherapy after EGFR-TKIs may be a successful therapeutic option for individuals who are resistant to them. It is still unclear if EGFR-TKIs can be administered again after immunotherapy has failed. We describe a case of a 37-year-old woman who was found to have T4N3M1a stage IVa lung adenocarcinoma. Amplification refractory mutation system PCR (ARMS-PCR) genetic testing suggested EGFR exon 19 deletion. The patient was initially treated with a regimen of icotinib (125 mg tid) combined with anlotinib (8 mg qd d1-d14) with an optimal efficacy rating of partial response (PR) and was granted a PFS of 7 months. In second-line treatment, the patient received three cycles of a KN046 (KN046 is a bispecific antibody inhibitor of PD-L1 and CTLA-4) 295 mg d1, pemetrexed 800 mg d1, plus carboplatin 750 mg d1 regimen, with an optimal efficacy rating of stable disease (SD) on CT. The third-line therapy was chosen to be afatinib with docetaxel, and the patient was evaluated for PR on CT. Up to 15 August 2022, the patient had a progression free survival (PFS) of 14 months. The successful treatment of this patient is a reminder that EGFR-TKI rechallenge in EGFR exon 19 deletion patients with EGFR-TKI resistance, in which immunotherapy has failed, may be effective.

Upfront Use of First-/Second-Generation EGFR-TKI Followed by Osimertinib Shows Better Prognosis than Upfront Osimertinib Therapy in Japanese Patients with Non-small-cell Lung Cancer with Exon 19 Deletion: A Single-Center Retrospective Study.

Clinical evidence on the increased efficacy of sequential epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) therapy in patients with EGFR-mutated non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is limited. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of upfront use of first-/second-generation TKI followed by osimertinib with upfront osimertinib therapy for each representative EGFR mutation in Japanese patients with NSCLC. Patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC were classified into two groups: first-/second-generation TKI followed by osimertinib (sequential TKI group) and upfront osimertinib groups. The total time to treatment failure (TTF) of TKI therapies, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were retrospectively evaluated. Of the 74 patients included in the analysis, 38 and 34 patients had exon 19 deletion and L858R, respectively, and other two patients had minor mutations. The sequential TKI group had a significantly longer TTF than the upfront osimertinib group in overall patients (33.2 vs. 11.2 months; p = 0.007) and in the subgroup of exon 19 deletion (36.7 vs. 10.0 months; p = 0.004), but not in the subgroup of L858R (22.6 vs. 15.6 months; p = 0.37). The similar tendency was observed in PFS. OS of the sequential TKI group was significantly longer compared with the upfront osimertinib group in overall patients, the subgroup of exon 19 deletion, and the subgroup of L858R. The upfront use of first-/second-generation TKI followed by osimertinib is one of the feasible and effective strategies in Japanese patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC, especially in patients with exon 19 deletion.

A case of epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor effectiveness in epidermal growth factor receptor mutation-positive squamous cell carcinoma.

A 71-year-old non-smoker woman was admitted to our hospital because of left front chest pain. A computed tomography scan showed a large mass of >7.0 cm in the lower left part of the lung and multiple organ metastases in the liver, brain, bone, and left adrenal gland. Pathological analysis of a resected specimen obtained by bronchoscopy revealed keratinization. In addition, p40 was positive and thyroid transcription factor-1, synaptophysin, CD56, and chromogranin A were negative by immunohistochemistry. Programmed cell death ligand 1 expression was 1%-10%, and exon 19 deletion was detected. We diagnosed the patient with stage IVB lung squamous cell carcinoma and administered osimertinib. Osimertinib was later replaced with afatinib because of grade 3 skin rash. Overall, the size of the cancer was decreased. Furthermore, her symptoms, laboratory data, and computer tomographic findings markedly improved. In summary, we experienced a case of epidermal growth factor receptor-positive lung squamous cell carcinoma that was responsive to epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors.

Clinicopathological Features and Significance of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutation in Surgically Resected Early-Stage Lung Adenocarcinoma.

The clinicopathological presentation of early-stage lung adenocarcinoma patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations has been seldom studied. Our study enrolled patients with stage I and II lung adenocarcinoma between January 2014 and December 2017 at the National Taiwan University Hospital. Clinicopathological features and prognosis were retrospectively reviewed and analyzed depending on EGFR mutation status. EGFR mutations were detected in 622 (60%) out of 1034 patients. Compared to the group without EGFR mutations, the group with EGFR mutations had more patients above 65 years of age (p < 0.001), more non-lepidic histological subtypes (p < 0.001), higher CEA levels (p = 0.044), higher grade of pleural (p = 0.02) and lymphovascular (p = 0.001) invasion, higher histological grade (p < 0.001), and a more advanced pathological stage (p = 0.022). In multivariate analysis, there was no significant difference in PFS or OS between the EGFR mutant and wild-type groups. In subtype analysis, the tumors with an L858R mutation had a more lepidic predominant histological type (p = 0.019) and less lymphovascular invasion (p = 0.011). No significant differences in PFS or OS were detected between the exon 19 deletion and L858R mutation groups. In early-stage lung adenocarcinoma, EGFR mutation may be considered as a treatment response predictor for tyrosine kinase inhibitors, instead of a predictor of clinical prognosis.

Correlation of EGFR mutation subtypes and survival in surgically treated brain metastasis from non-small-cell lung cancer.

OBJECTIVE: Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation is a positive prognostic factor for survival in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In such patients, brain metastasis signifies negative outcomes. Patients with NSCLC brain metastasis that may benefit from neurosurgery is under investigation. We aim to investigate the impact of different mutation loci in surgically treated NSCLC brain metastasis patients. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included patients with NSCLC brain metastasis who underwent brain lesionectomy, followed by radiotherapy and chemotherapy or targeted therapy. Demographics and tumor characteristics were compared between the EGFR mutant type and wild type groups. Postoperative survival and risk factors were analyzed using log rank and Cox regression methods. RESULTS: Overall, 101 patients were included, with 57 belonging to the EGFR mutant type group and 44 to the EGFR wild type group. The median postoperative survival was 17 months for the entire cohort, with the duration being 19 and 14 months for EGFR mutant type and wild type patients (p = 0.013), respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that exon 19 del (p = 0.02) and a high Karnofsky Performance Scale score (p < 0.01) were independent positive prognostic factors to predict survival. The timing of development of the brain metastasis or the location of the intracranial metastasis was not associated with EGFR mutations. CONCLUSION: EGFR mutations are associated with better survival outcomes in patients with NSCLC brain metastasis suitable for surgical treatment. This advantage was attributed to patients having a specific mutation of exon 19 deletion.

EGFR T751_I759delinsN Mutation in Exon19 Detected by NGS but Not by Real-Time PCR in a Heavily-Treated Patient with NSCLC.

The detection of driver gene mutations can determine appropriate treatment strategies for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) by identifying the presence of an effective druggable target. Mutations in the gene encoding the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) are common driver mutations in NSCLC that can be effectively targeted by the use of EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs). However, without the detection of driver mutations, appropriate therapeutic decisions cannot be made. The most commonly applied methods for detecting driver gene mutations are assays based on polymerase chain reaction (PCR). However, the underlying mechanism of PCR-based assays limits the detection of rare mutations. Therefore, patients harboring rare mutations may not receive optimal treatment. We report a heavily-treated patient with NSCLC who harbored a T751_I759delinsN mutation in exon 19 of EGFR that was not detected by real-time PCR but was successfully detected by next-generation sequencing (NGS). The detection of a driver mutation using NGS resulted in the administration of targeted therapy, leading to favorable progression-free survival for the patient. Our report highlights the importance and potential of routine NGS testing among NSCLC patients for whom traditional assays fail to detect driver mutations when determining treatment options.

Overall Survival Benefits of First-Line Treatments for Asian Patients with Advanced Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor-Mutated NSCLC Harboring Exon 19 Deletion: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.

(1) Background: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have explored various primary treatments for individuals diagnosed as having later-stage epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated non-small-cell lung cancer. Nevertheless, the extent to which such treatments are efficacious, particularly with regard to overall survival (OS) rates of patients from Asia with exon 19 deletion (19del), has yet to be clarified. (2) Methods: A systematic review and frequentist network meta-analysis were conducted by obtaining pertinent studies from PubMed/MEDLINE Ovid, Embase, Cochrane Library, and trial registries, as well as various other sources. RCTs in which two or multiple treatments in the primary setting for patients from Asia with EGFR 19del were compared were included. This research has been recorded in the Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (CRD 42022320833). (3) Results: A total of 2715 patients from Asia participated in 18 trials in which 12 different treatments were administered, which included: EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) (osimertinib, dacomitinib, afatinib, erlotinib, gefitinib, and icotinib), pemetrexed-based chemotherapy, pemetrexed-free chemotherapy, and combination treatments (gefitinib plus apatinib, erlotinib plus ramucirumab, erlotinib plus bevacizumab, and gefitinib plus pemetrexed-based chemotherapy). Such treatments were not significantly beneficial in terms of OS for patients from Asia who had 19del. It was demonstrated that erlotinib plus bevacizumab, ramucirumab plus erlotinib, and osimertinib consistently yielded the greatest benefits regarding progression-free survival benefit (P-scores = 94%, 84%, and 80%, respectively). Combination treatments resulted in increased toxicity, particularly gefitinib plus apatinib and erlotinib plus bevacizumab, causing the highest prevalence of grade ≥ 3 adverse events. Icotinib and osimertinib had the fewest grade ≥ 3 adverse events. Specific treatments were associated with a wide range of toxicity levels. (4) Conclusions: In patients from Asia with 19del, both EGFR-TKIs and treatments in which therapies were combined exhibited no OS benefits in comparison with standard chemotherapy treatments. Additional research is required to study TKIs' resistance mechanisms and possible combined approaches for individuals harboring this common mutation.

Allele-specific activation, enzyme kinetics, and inhibitor sensitivities of EGFR exon 19 deletion mutations in lung cancer.

Oncogenic mutations within the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) are found in 15 to 30% of all non-small-cell lung carcinomas. The term exon 19 deletion (ex19del) is collectively used to refer to more than 20 distinct genomic alterations within exon 19 that comprise the most common EGFR mutation subtype in lung cancer. Despite this heterogeneity, clinical treatment decisions are made irrespective of which EGFR ex19del variant is present within the tumor, and there is a paucity of information regarding how individual ex19del variants influence protein structure and function. Herein, we identified allele-specific functional differences among ex19del variants attributable to recurring sequence and structure motifs. We built all-atom structural models of 60 ex19del variants identified in patients and combined molecular dynamics simulations with biochemical and biophysical experiments to analyze three ex19del mutations (E746_A750, E746_S752 > V, and L747_A750 > P). We demonstrate that sequence variation in ex19del alters oncogenic cell growth, dimerization propensity, enzyme kinetics, and tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) sensitivity. We show that in contrast to E746_A750 and E746_S752 > V, the L747_A750 > P variant forms highly active ligand-independent dimers. Enzyme kinetic analysis and TKI inhibition experiments suggest that E746_S752 > V and L747_A750 > P display reduced TKI sensitivity due to decreased adenosine 5'-triphosphate Km. Through these analyses, we propose an expanded framework for interpreting ex19del variants and considerations for therapeutic intervention.

A multicenter-retrospective study of non-small-cell lung carcinoma harboring uncommon epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations: different subtypes of EGFR exon 19 deletion-insertions exhibit the clinical characteristics and prognosis of non-small cell lung carcinoma.

Background: The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical features, immunohistochemistry (IHC), compound mutation, and prognosis of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring exon 19 deletion-insertion mutations. Methods: This retrospective analysis included 4,666 NSCLC patients harboring epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations in a multi-center study from January 2017 to December 2020, and 69 patients with EGFR exon 19 deletion-insertions were taken to account. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) was used to detect the subtype of EGFR exon 19 deletion-insertions. These mutations were correlated with clinical features, immunophenotype and molecular characteristics of tumors and outcomes of patients. Results: Sixty-nine patients with EGFR exon 19 deletion-insertions were analyzed in this study, comprising 24 cases (34.8%) with L747_P753delinsS, 9 cases (13.1%) with L747_A750delinsP, both 5 cases (7.2%) in E746_A750delinsQP, E746_S752delinsV and both 4 cases (5.8%) in E746_T751delinsA and L747_T751delinsP. Twenty-nine males (42%) and 40 females (58%), with a median age of 59.7 years; 12 (21.7%) participants were smokers and 54 (78.3%) were nonsmokers. The compound mutations were tumor protein 53 (TP53) (45.83%), phosphoinositide-3-kinase (PIK3CA) (11.59%), and almost 16.67% in retinoblastoma 1 (RB1), melanocyte stimulating hormone (MSH), and myelocytomatosis (MYC). The best overall response was complete response (CR) in 47.8% of patients, partial response (PR) in 33.3% and stable disease (SD) in 13.1% of patients. Correlation between immunoreactivity of Napsin A, thyroid transcription factor (TTF), cytokeratin (CK7), surfactant proteins B (SPB), and the subtypes of EGFR exon 19 deletion-insertion was significantly statistically different (P<0.05). The disease control rate (DCR) was 29%. The median progression-free survival (mPFS) and 95% confidence interval (CI) of exon 19 deletion-insertion subtypes were 14.821 (9.917 to 19.726) months for L747_P753delinsS, 23.500 (15.877 to 31.123) months for L747_A750delinsP, 26.667 (11.731 to 41.603) months for L747_T751delinsP, and 11.713 (7.786 to 15.639) months for the others. Patients receiving treatment with 3rd generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) had the shortest progression-free survival (PFS) (median: 7.179, 95% CI: 3.969-10.388). Conclusions: The subtypes of exon 19 deletion-insertion exhibited different clinical characteristics compared with other common mutations. Our finding argued in favor of analyzing the correlation between immunoreactivity and the subtypes of EGFR exon 19 deletion-insertion. The EGFR exon 19 deletion-insertion mutations exhibited limited sensitivity to 3rd generation TKI. Moreover, in light of therapeutic effect for the subtype, L747_T751delinsP achieved longer PFS.

Impact of EGFR exon 19 deletion subtypes on clinical outcomes in EGFR-TKI-Treated advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.

OBJECTIVE: Exon 19 deletion (19del) is a sensitive mutation of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) observed in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and consists of a large number of variants. It remains unclear whether 19del subtype impacts clinical outcomes following EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy. METHODS: We systematically searched web databases and identified eligible studies comparing the clinical outcomes of various EGFR 19del subtypes with EGFR-TKIs. The hazard ratio (HR) for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS),as well as the risk ratio (RR) for objective response rate and the frequency of acquired T790M mutation were used as study endpoints. RESULTS: A total of eleven retrospective studies and one prospective study involving 1,630 NSCLC patients with EGFR 19del were included in this meta-analysis. Most of studies were from Asia, and the 19del subtypes in these studies were grouped differently. Patients harboring deletions starting from E746 had significantly longer OS than those with deletions starting from L747 (HR, 0.79; 95% CI: 0.65 to 0.96, P = 0.019), and relatively but not significantly longer PFS (HR, 0.86; 95% CI: 0.69 to 1.06, P = 0.160). Patients with E746_A750del, the most common 19del subtype, had a significantly higher frequency of acquired T790M mutation when treated with first- or second-generation EGFR-TKIs compared to those with other 19del subtypes (RR, 0.76; 95% CI: 0.64-0.89, P = 0.001). There were no differences in PFS between the E746_A750del group and the uncommon group, or between the 15-nucleotide deletion group and other patients. CONCLUSION: This is the first meta-analysis to present survival outcomes and acquired T790M mutation frequency in the context of EGFR 19del subtype with EGFR-TKI therapy. Patients with a deletion starting from E746 show better OS than those with other subtypes, and patients with E746_A750del subtype have a higher frequency of acquired T790M mutation.