Ayurveda Management of Allergic Rhinitis: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Allergic rhinitis (AR) is the inflammation of the membranes lining the nose due to allergen exposure and is characterized by sneezing, nasal congestion, itching of the nose, or postnasal discharge. The prevalence varies worldwide, perhaps due to the geographic and aeroallergen differences, with 10% to 30% of the world's population experiencing AR. In this study, Anu Taila Nasya, Naradiya Laxmivilas Rasa, and Shirishadi Kwath will be compared to a fluticasone nasal spray. OBJECTIVE: The primary aim is to assess the efficacy of Ayurvedic management for AR (or vataja pratishyaya) by comparing it to a conventional control group. The secondary aims are to determine the mean change in the nasal endoscopy index and the mean change in the laboratory tests. METHODS: This ongoing study is an open-label randomized controlled interventional trial, with a sample size of 90 both in the trial and standard control group (including dropouts, 20%), and will be carried out for 24 months. Participants in the trial group will receive Ayurvedic treatment, that is, Anu Taila Nasya (6 drops in each nostril for 7 days for 3 consecutive weeks), Naradiya Laxmivilas Rasa (250 mg twice per day), and Shirishadi Kwath (40 ml twice per day for 45 days). The participants in the control group will receive a fluticasone propionate nasal spray (2 sprays once per day for 45 days). The primary outcome will include the mean change in the Control of Allergic Rhinitis and Asthma Test score, and the secondary outcomes will include the mean change in the nasal endoscopy index (assessment of nasal membrane color, pale or hyperemia; rhinorrhea, watery or yellow; and inferior turbinate swelling, hypertrophy) and the mean change in the laboratory tests. RESULTS: As of May 2024, 72 patients have been enrolled in both groups. Data analysis should be completed by February 2025. The study will be reported following standard guidelines for reporting randomized controlled trials. Clinical results will be disseminated through conferences and peer-reviewed publication in a relevant journal. CONCLUSIONS: The Ayurvedic approach could be an evidence-based therapeutic tactic for the management of AR. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical Trials Registry India CTRI/2023/06/053395; https://tinyurl.com/564d2zz8. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/56063.

Comparative performance study of paperboard disposable spacers versus commercial valved holding chambers for aerosol delivery.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to evaluate and compare the performance, for the administration of fluticasone propionate with a pressurized metered-dose inhaler (pMDI), of two low-tech paperboard spacers versus two commercially available valved holding chambers (VHC). METHODS: According to the Canadian standard CAN/CSA-Z264.1-02, total emitted dose (TED) and aerodynamic size distribution were measured for the pMDI in combination with 4 different spacers: a homemade paper cup spacer, the DispozABLE® paperboard spacer, the AeroChamber Plus® plastic VHC, and the Vortex® aluminium VHC. RESULTS: The two disposable paperboard spacers had a lower TED compared to the aluminium VHC, but delivered more than 2.5 times the dose of fluticasone than the commercial plastic VHC. The 3 antistatic devices (i.e. the aluminium VHC, the paperboard DispozABLE® spacer and the paper cup spacer) delivered a significantly higher dose of fine particles than the less antistatic plastic VHC. Their fine particle fraction was statistically similar to that obtained with pMDI without spacer. This respirable fraction ensures an optimal therapeutic effect. All spacers limited the flow of coarse particles, thus avoiding adverse effects on the trachea and oropharynx. CONCLUSION: We have shown that inexpensive and low-tech paperboard spacers are interesting alternatives for the administration of aerosols.

Inhaled corticosteroid delivery is markedly affected by breathing pattern and valved holding chamber model.

BACKGROUND: There is a scarcity of high-quality research on the efficient delivery of inhaled corticosteroids using valved holding chambers (VHCs) in children. METHODS: The delivered dose (DD) of fluticasone from a metered dose inhaler (pMDI) was tested using four VHCs: AeroChamber plus Flow-Vu (AC), Babyhaler (BH), EasyChamber (EC), and Optichamber Diamond (OD). The in vitro setup included an anatomical child throat model, Next Generation Impactor, and a breathing simulator to generate tidal breathing of a four and a 6-year-old child, and adult type single inhalation. RESULTS: OD showed the lowest proportion of fluticasone trapped in the throat with all breathing patterns. AC showed similar fine particle dose (FPD) in the respirable range (1-5 µm) irrespective of the breathing pattern. For BH, the median FPD 1-5 µm was highest during adult breathing. OD and EC showed higher overall DD and higher doses in the 1-5 µm range with paediatric breathing profiles compared to adult inhalation. The median DD and FPD 1-5 µm were significantly lower with BH compared to any other VHCs during tidal breathing. Compared to EC, the FPD of the other VHCs were skewed towards <2 µm particles. CONCLUSION: Fluticasone delivery is markedly affected by breathing pattern and VHC model. The observed differences in throat deposition and FPD delivered may have significant clinical implications for side effects and controlling airway inflammation. All VHCs intended for paediatric use should undergo testing using internationally recognised standardised methods incorporating clinically relevant paediatric breathing patterns.

Baseline Characteristics and Maintenance Therapy Choice on Symptom Control, Reliever Use, Exacerbation Risk in Moderate-Severe Asthma: A Clinical Modelling and Simulation Study.

INTRODUCTION: Although some factors associated with asthma symptom deterioration and risk of exacerbation have been identified, these are not yet fully characterised. We conducted a clinical modelling and simulation study to understand baseline factors affecting symptom control, reliever use and exacerbation risk in patients with moderate-severe asthma during follow-up on regularly dosed inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) monotherapy, or ICS/long-acting beta2-agonist (LABA) combination therapy. METHODS: Individual patient data from randomised clinical trials (undertaken between 2001 and 2019) were used to model the time course of symptoms (n = 7593), patterns of reliever medication use (n = 3768) and time-to-first exacerbation (n = 6763), considering patient-specific and extrinsic factors, including treatment. Model validation used standard graphical and statistical criteria. Change in symptom control scores (Asthma Control Questionnaire 5 [ACQ-5]), reduction in reliever use and annualised exacerbation rate were then simulated in patient cohorts with different baseline characteristics and treatment settings. RESULTS: Being a smoker, having higher baseline ACQ-5 and body mass index affected symptom control scores, reliever use and exacerbation risk (p < 0.01). In addition, low forced expiratory volume in 1 s percent predicted, female sex, season and previous exacerbations were found to contribute to a further increase in exacerbation risk (p < 0.01), whereas long asthma history was associated with more frequent reliever use (p < 0.01). These effects were independent from the underlying maintenance therapy. In different scenarios, fluticasone furoate (FF)/vilanterol was associated with greater reductions in reliever use and exacerbation rates compared with FF or fluticasone propionate (FP) alone or budesonide/formoterol, independently from other factors (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: This study provided further insight into the effects of individual baseline characteristics on treatment response and highlighted significant differences in the performance of ICS/LABA combination therapy on symptom control, reliever use and exacerbation risk. These factors should be incorporated into clinical practice as the basis for tailored management of patients with moderate-severe asthma.

In this study we quantified how individual baseline patient characteristics at the start of treatment influence the response to regular maintenance medication. Specifically, using computer modelling and simulations based on data from individual patients enrolled into clinical trials in moderate­severe asthma, we predicted how much reliever inhaler they need, how well they rate their asthma control, and how likely an asthma attack (exacerbation) is to occur within the next 12 months. Simulation scenarios were then implemented to evaluate opportunities to improve and personalise real-life management of patients in clinical practice. Considering symptom control level, reliever use and other patient-specific factors at the start of treatment, we assessed how well maintenance therapy with inhaled corticosteroids/bronchodilators contributes to symptom improvement and/or reduction in the risk of asthma attacks. These scenarios show that current smokers, people with higher asthma symptom scores, who are obese, and have a longer history of asthma tend to use their reliever inhalers more often. Moreover, this was linked to a higher risk of having an asthma attack and worse symptom control. This pattern appears to compensate in most cases for the effect of the same baseline factors on symptom control. Switching patients who are not responding well to initial treatment with the inhaled corticosteroid, fluticasone propionate, to fluticasone furoate/vilanterol resulted in a significantly greater reduction in reliever inhaler use and risk of asthma attack, compared with those switched to budesonide/formoterol. These findings highlight the importance of tailored choices for optimal management of patients with moderate­severe asthma.

Synergistic effect of magnesium stearate and fine lactose in improving aerosolization performance of fluticasone propionate in dry powder formulation.

Magnesium stearate (MgSt) and lactose fines are often used as ternary components in carrier-based dry powder inhalers (DPIs) to improve fine particle fraction (FPF), but whether they act synergistically to improve aerosolization performance of DPI formulations is currently less studied. In addition, the applicability of utilizing powder rheological parameters to predict the FPF needs to be further verified. Thus, in this study, using fluticasone propionate (FP) as a model drug, effect of lactose fines addition in 0.5% MgSt containing DPI formulations on their powder and aerodynamic properties was explored. Influence of MgSt and fines mixing order on the DPIs performance was also investigated. The results showed that addition of lactose fines (1-10%) in 0.5% MgSt containing formulations could further improve flowability and enhance adhesion of the mixtures, and they could act synergistically to improve FPF. Moreover, the presence of 0.5% MgSt can greatly reduce the amount of lactose fines required to achieve the comparable FPF. The mixing order can affect distribution of MgSt on the carrier surface, with higher FPF noted when MgSt was mixed with carrier first, followed by lactose fines. A good linear relationship between powder rheological parameters such as basic flowability energy (BFE), Permeability and FPF was disclosed. In conclusion, in FP based DPIs, MgSt and lactose fines act synergistically to enhance FPF by tuning powder characteristics. Good flowability (27.39%) and strong adhesion (72.61%) contributed to the enhanced drug deposition in the lung.

Exploring the Relationship between Inhaled Corticosteroid Usage, Asthma Severity, and Sleep-Disordered Breathing: A Systematic Literature Review.

(1) Background: Sleep-disordered breathing and asthma are often interrelated. Children and adults with asthma are more susceptible to sleep apnea. Inhaled corticosteroids effectively reduce inflammation and prevent structural changes in the airways. Objective: to explore the existing literature to determine whether inhaled corticosteroids play a role in sleep-disordered breathing in patients with asthma. (2) Methods: We conducted a thorough search of the PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases for English-language articles published up to 12 May 2024. We utilized the ROBINS-E tool to assess the risk of bias. (4) Conclusions: 136 articles were discerned upon conducting the literature search. A total of 13 articles underwent exhaustive full-text scrutiny, resulting in 6 being considered non-relevant. The remaining seven articles, assessed for eligibility, were incorporated into the final analysis. Five studies were identified in adults and two in children. In adult patients, inhaled corticosteroids, especially at high doses, appear to increase the risk of sleep apnea in a dose-dependent manner. Moreover, the properties of inhaled corticosteroids, such as particle size, may impact the risk of developing sleep apnea. In children, the severity of asthma is a key factor affecting the prevalence of sleep apnea, whereas inhaled corticosteroids appear to be a less significant risk factor compared to adults. All of the studies reviewed were classified as having a high risk of bias or some concerns regarding bias. Each study revealed at least one type of bias that raised notable concerns. This research highlights a complex interaction between the use of inhaled corticosteroids, the severity of asthma, and the onset of sleep apnea. Additional research is necessary to investigate these relationships further.

Generic competition and prices for azelastine-fluticasone nasal spray.

KEY POINTS: The original manufacturer of azelastine‒fluticasone (AZ‒FL) prevented generic availability until 2020 via patent enforcement. Following generic availability of AZ‒FL, Medicare utilization increased and spending decreased. Retail prices for generic AZ‒FL remain high due to markup by manufacturers and pharmacies.

Pharmacokinetic Bioequivalence between Generic and Originator Orally Inhaled Drug Products: Validity of Administration of Doses above the Approved Single Maximum Dose.

Pharmacokinetic bioequivalence of orally inhaled drug products is a critical component of the US FDA's "weight of evidence" approach, and it can serve as the sole indicator of safety and effectiveness of follow-on inhalation products approved in Europe and some other geographic areas. The approved labels of the orally inhaled drug products recommend the maximum number of actuations that can be administered in a single dose on one occasion. This single maximum dose may consist of one or more inhalations depending upon the product. Bioequivalence studies for the inhalation drug product registrations in the US and EU have employed single and multiple actuation doses, in some cases over and above the approved single maximum labeled doses, thus, inconsistent with the approved labeling of the reference products. Pharmacokinetics of inhaled drug products after single and multiple doses may be different, with implications for bioequivalence determined at single and multiple doses. Scientific literature indicates that the relative bioavailability of the Test and Reference products may differ between administrations of doses in one and multiple inhalations. Multiple doses not only alter the pharmacokinetics but also may reduce the sensitivity of the bioassay to actual differences between the Test and Reference product performances. Ability of the pharmacokinetic bioassay to accurately determine the extent of difference between two products may also be substantially reduced at high doses. Therefore, in our opinion, pharmacokinetic bioequivalence to support regulatory approvals of inhalation products at doses above the recommended single maximum dose should be avoided. Furthermore, the bioequivalence of products (if any) established at doses exceeding the approved single maximum doses should be revisited to determine if the products maintain bioequivalence when evaluated at the clinically relevant single maximum doses.

A Simulation Study of the Effect of Clinical Characteristics and Treatment Choice on Reliever Medication Use, Symptom Control and Exacerbation Risk in Moderate-Severe Asthma.

INTRODUCTION: The relationship between immediate symptom control, reliever medication use and exacerbation risk on treatment response and factors that modify it have not been assessed in an integrated manner. Here we apply simulation scenarios to evaluate the effect of individual baseline characteristics on treatment response in patients with moderate-severe asthma on regular maintenance dosing monotherapy with fluticasone propionate (FP) or combination therapy with fluticasone propionate/salmeterol (FP/SAL) or budesonide/formoterol (BUD/FOR). METHODS: Reduction in reliever medication use (puffs/24 h), change in symptom control scores (ACQ-5), and annualised exacerbation rate over 12 months were simulated in a cohort of patients with different baseline characteristics (e.g. time since diagnosis, asthma control questionnaire (ACQ-5) symptom score, smoking status, body mass index (BMI) and sex) using drug-disease models derived from large phase III/IV clinical studies. RESULTS: Simulation scenarios show that being a smoker, having higher baseline ACQ-5 and BMI, and long asthma history is associated with increased reliever medication use (p < 0.01). This increase correlates with a higher exacerbation risk and higher ACQ-5 scores over the course of treatment, irrespective of the underlying maintenance therapy. Switching non-responders to ICS monotherapy to combination therapy after 3 months resulted in immediate reduction in reliever medication use (i.e. 1.3 vs. 1.0 puffs/24 h for FP/SAL and BUD/FOR, respectively). In addition, switching patients with ACQ-5 > 1.5 at baseline to FP/SAL resulted in 34% less exacerbations than those receiving regular dosing BUD/FOR (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: We have identified baseline characteristics of patients with moderate to severe asthma that are associated with greater reliever medication use, poor symptom control and higher exacerbation risk. Moreover, the effects of different inhaled corticosteroid (ICS)/long-acting beta agonist (LABA) combinations vary significantly when considering long-term treatment performance. These factors should be considered in clinical practice as a basis for personalised management of patients with moderate-severe asthma symptoms.

In this study we looked at how different factors affect the response to asthma treatment in people with moderate to severe asthma who are taking regular medication. Specifically, we wanted to quantify how much asthma duration, differences in the degree of symptom control and lung function, as well as smoking habit, body weight, and sex influence how well someone responds to regular maintenance therapy. Using computer simulations based on models obtained from data in a large patient population with moderate­severe asthma, we explored scenarios that reflect real-life management of patients undergoing treatment with inhaled corticosteroids alone or in combination with long-acting beta agonists over a 12-month period. We looked at how much reliever inhaler they use, how well they rate their asthma control, and how often they have asthma attacks. By considering these results together, we evaluated how well the treatments work on ongoing symptoms and/or reduce the risk of future asthma attacks. Our simulations showed that smokers, people with higher asthma symptom scores, who are obese, and have a longer history of asthma tend to use their reliever inhalers more often. This was linked to a higher risk of having asthma attacks and worse symptom control. Switching those patients who do not respond well to their initial treatment with corticosteroid to combination therapy reduced how much reliever inhaler they need. Also, the effects of fluticasone propionate/salmeterol combination therapy were greater than budesonide/formoterol. In conclusion, our study found that certain patient characteristics can predict how well someone responds to asthma treatment.

Effect of fluticasone propionate/formoterol and fluticasone furoate/vilanterol on adolescents with chronic bronchial obstruction.

Background: The combination of an inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) and long-acting ß-agonist (LABA) (ICS/LABA) has shown superiority in improving lung function (FEV1) compared with an ICS alone. The clinical effect of a ICS/LABA combination depends on the fine-particle fraction and the pulmonary deposition. Objective: We sought to compare the efficacy of 2 combinations of an ICS and LABA, namely, fluticasone propionate (FP) and formoterol (FORM) (FP/FORM) and fluticasone furoate (FF) and vilanterol (VI) (FF/VI), in asthmatic adolescents with chronic bronchial obstruction. Methods: FP/FORM (125 µg/5 µg, 2 doses twice daily via the k-haler [Mundipharma, Cambridge, UK]) and FF/VI (92 µg/22 µg, once daily via the Ellipta inhaler [GlaxoSmithKline]) were administered to adolescents aged 12 to 17 years who required regular antiasthmatic medication and had a ratio of FEV1 to forced vital capacity (FEV1/FVC) less than -1.65 SD in a 2-sequence, 16-week crossover trial. The primary efficacy end point was change in FEV1 compared with baseline. Secondary end points were FEV1/FVC ratio, maximal expiratory flow at 50% of the FVC, impulse oscillometry indices respiratory resistance at 5 Hz (R5), difference between R5 and respiratory resistance at 20 Hz (R20), area of reactance, and Asthma Control Test score. Results: Both ICS/LABA combinations resulted in a significant improvement in FEV1 and maximal expiratory flow at 50% of the FVC z scores without any significant difference between FP/FORM and FF/VI, with 40% of patients with either treatment achieving a normal prebronchodilator FEV1/FVC z score. Neither area of reactance nor difference between R5 and R20 improved significantly with either treatment. Conclusion: Both ICS/LABA combinations demonstrated significant improvements in FEV1z score. More than one-third of the asthmatic adolescents with prolonged bronchial obstruction achieved a normal prebronchodilator FEV1/FVC ratio.

Efficacy and safety of different inhaled corticosteroids for bronchopulmonary dysplasia prevention in preterm infants: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of inhaled corticosteroids (budesonide, beclomethasone, or fluticasone propionate) in preventing bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) for premature infants. METHOD: Electronic databases, including PubMed, EMBASE, Web of science, Scopus, and Cochrane library, were searched from databases inception to January 2022 for eligible randomized controlled trials. Clinical outcomes such as BPD, mortality, BPD or death, adverse events, and neurodevelopmental outcomes were assessed. RESULTS: Overall, budesonide was significantly associated with a reduction in BPD at 36 weeks' postmenstrual age (RR 0.48; 95 % CI [0.38, 0.62]) and patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) (RR 0.75; 95 % CI [0.63, 0.89]) compared with control treatments. Early longer duration inhalation of budesonide alone was associated with a lower risk of BPD at 36 weeks' postmenstrual age and PDA compared with controls. Early shorter duration intratracheal instillation of budesonide with surfactant as vehicle was associated with a lower risk of BPD at 36 weeks' postmenstrual age and all-cause mortality compared with surfactant. There was no statistically significant difference between budesonide and control groups regarding neurodevelopmental impairment. Beclomethasone and fluticasone propionate did not show any superior or inferior effect on clinical outcomes compared to control treatments. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that budesonide, especially intratracheal instillation of budesonide using surfactant as a vehicle, is a safe and effective option in preventing BPD for preterm infants. More well-design large-scale trials with long-term follow-ups are necessary to verify the present findings.

Eosinophilic Esophagitis: The Role of Steroids and the Dose, Duration, and Delivery of Steroid Therapy.

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a chronic immune-mediated condition characterized by the eosinophil infiltration of the esophagus (>15 per high power field). Recently, there has been an increase in both the incidence and prevalence of the disease. The common modalities of treatment are dietary modification, proton pump inhibitors, and steroids. However, the United States Food and Drug Administration has not approved any drugs for the treatment of EoE. This review has discussed the role of steroids in the treatment of EoE, focusing on the various formulations of the drug, its dosage, drug delivery, and duration of therapy. The study also covers the common outcomes of steroid therapy and its side effects.

Umeclidinium plus vilanterol versus fluticasone propionate plus salmeterol for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials.

PURPOSE: Umeclidinium plus vilanterol (UMEC/VI) is an inhaled long-acting muscarinic antagonist/long-acting beta2-agonist (LAMA/LABA), recently approved as once-daily maintenance therapy for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). This meta-analysis aims to assess the efficacy and safety of UMEC/VI compared with fluticasone propionate plus salmeterol (FP/SAL). METHODS: A systematic search was conducted by a trained medical research librarian across MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and Chinese Biomedical Literature Database (CBM) for randomized controlled trials comparing UMEC/VI with FP/SAL in COPD patients. Two reviewers independently assessed the risk of bias and extracted data. The primary outcome was 0-24 h weighted mean (wm) forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV1), trough FEV1. The secondary outcomes were other lung functions, symptoms, quality of life, and safety. RESULTS: Three studies with 2119 patients were included in the meta-analysis. UMEC/VI showed improvement in 0-24 h wm FEV1 (mean difference (MD) 0.08 L, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.06 to 0.10, P < 0.01, moderate quality) and trough FEV1 (MD 0.09 L, 95% CI 0.07 to 0.11, P < 0.01, moderate quality) in comparison with FP/SAL. UMEC/VI statistically significantly improved all other lung functions compared with FP/SAL. However, there were no significant differences between UMEC/VI and FP/SAL in rescue-medication use, symptomatic endpoints, and health outcomes. UMEC/VI also demonstrated fewer drug-related adverse effects (risk ratio 0.47, 95% CI 0.27 to 0.82, P = 0.01, low quality). CONCLUSIONS: UMEC/VI, when compared with FP/SAL, demonstrated significant improvements in lung functions with fewer drug-related adverse effects. However, the conclusion was limited by the scarcity of studies and long-term trials.

Pharmacokinetic Models for Inhaled Fluticasone Propionate and Salmeterol Xinafoate to Quantify Batch-to-Batch Variability.

Advair Diskus is an essential treatment for asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. It is a dry powder inhaler with a combination of fluticasone propionate (FP) and salmeterol xinafoate (SX). However, the pharmacokinetics (PK) batch-to-batch variability of the reference-listed drug (RLD) hindered its generic product development. This work developed the PK models for inhaled FP and SX that could represent potential batch variability. Two batches each of the reference and the test product (R1, R2, T1, T2) of Advair Diskus (100 µg FP/50 µg SX inhalation) were administered to 60 healthy subjects in a 4-period, 4-sequence crossover study. The failure of the bioequivalence (BE) between R1 and R2 confirmed the high between-batch variability of the RLD. Non-linear mixed effect modeling was used to estimate the population mean PK parameters for each batch. For FP, a 2-compartment model with a sequential dual zero-order absorption best described the PK profile. For SX, a 2-compartment model with a first-order absorption model best fit the data. Both models were able to capture the plasma concentration, the maximum concentration, and the total exposure (AUCinf) adequately for each batch, which could be used to simulate the BE study in the future. In vitro properties were also measured for each batch, and the batch with a higher fraction of the fine particle (diameter < 1 µm, < 2 µm) had a higher AUCinf. This positive correlation for both FP and SX could potentially assist the batch selection for the PK BE study.

Intraclass comparison of inhaled corticosteroids for the risk of pneumonia in chronic obstructive pulmonary airway disorder: a network meta-analysis and meta-regression.

BACKGROUND: Inhalational corticosteroids (ICS) were observed to increase the pneumonia risk in chronic obstructive pulmonary airway disorder (COPD). However, it is unknown whether any differences exist between the drugs within the ICS class. AIM: This study aimed to evaluate the risk of pneumonia associated with different ICS and identify factors that predict pneumonia in patients with moderate-to-severe COPD using a network meta-analysis. METHOD: Electronic databases (Medline, Cochrane CENTRAL and Google Scholar) were searched for trials comparing ICS in COPD patients. The outcomes were pneumonia and serious pneumonia. Odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence interval (95% CI) were estimated. Meta-regression was used to identify the predictors. The strength of evidence was graded using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations approach. RESULTS: Sixty-six studies (103,347 participants) were included. Fluticasone (OR: 1.46; 95% CI: 1.26, 1.7), mometasone (OR: 2.2; 95% CI: 1.05, 4.6), and beclometasone (OR: 1.7; 95% CI: 1.1, 2.6) were observed with an increased pneumonia risk compared to placebo. Fluticasone (OR: 1.5; 95% CI: 1.3, 1.7) was observed with an increased risk of serious pneumonia. High doses (OR: 1.2; 95% CI: 1.03, 1.4), BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2 (OR: 1.6; 95% CI: 1.1, 2.2), and history of exacerbations in the preceding year predicted the pneumonia risk. Evidence strength was moderate. CONCLUSION: ICS class differences in pneumonia risk were observed in terms of pooled effect estimates but it is unlikely that any clinically relevant differences exist. Risk-benefit analysis supports ICS use in moderate-severe COPD.

Preclinical evaluation of novel synthesised nanoparticles based on tyrosine poly(ester amide) for improved targeted pulmonary delivery.

Fixed dose combinations (FDCs) incorporating two or three medicines in a single inhaler have been created to enhance patient compliance and hence clinical outcomes. However, the development of dry powder inhalers (DPIs), particularly for FDCs, faces challenges pertinent to formulation uniformity and reproducibility. Therefore, this project aimed to employ nanotechnology to develop a FDC of DPIs for market-leading medicines-fluticasone propionate (FP) and salmeterol xinafoate (SAL)-for asthma management. Nanoaggregates were prepared using a novel biocompatible and biodegradable poly(ester amide) based on the amino acid tyrosine, utilising a one-step interfacial polymerisation process. The produced tyrosine poly (ester amide) drug-loaded nanoparticles were evaluated for content uniformity, PSA, FTIR, TEM, DSC, XRD and aerodynamic performance (in vitro and in vivo). The optimised formulation demonstrated high entrapment efficiency- > 90%. The aerodynamic performance in terms of the emitted dose, fine particle fraction and respirable dose was superior to the carrier-based marketed product. In-vivo studies showed that FP (above the marketed formulation) and SAL reached the lungs of mice in a reproducible manner. These results highlight the superiority of novel FDC FP/SAL nanoparticles prepared via a one-step process, which can be used as a cost-effective and efficient method to alleviate the burden of asthma.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of fluticasone furoate/umeclidinium bromide/vilanterol and umeclidinium bromide/vilanterol in the management of moderate and severe COPD in China.

OBJECTIVE: A study has analyzed the long-term cost-effectiveness of fluticasone furoate/umeclidinium bromide/vilanterol combination therapy (FF/UMEC/VI) versus umeclidinium bromide/vilanterol dual therapy (UMEC/VI) in the treatment of moderate or severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), providing evidence for decision-making in COPD treatment. METHODS: From the perspective of the whole society, a Markov model based on the severity of COPD was established, consisting of four states: moderate, severe, very severe, and death. The cycle of the model is three months, and the time frame of the study is 20 years. Data such as initial states, transition probabilities, costs, and utilities were collected from published literature, the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) COPD economic report, Yaozh database, and the National Statistics Office. The discount rate is 5 %, and the willingness to pay threshold is set at three times the per capita GDP of China in 2022. TreeAge Pro 2011 was used to obtain the results of multiplication analyses, and one-way factor analysis and probability sensitivity analysis were conducted. RESULTS: The study findings demonstrate that for patients treated with FF/UMEC/VI and UMEC/VI, the 20-year treatment costs amount to $10,126.46 and $10,685.74, respectively. Similarly, the effectiveness is 32.94 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and 32.19 QALYs, respectively. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio is $-745.70/QALY, which is lower than the willingness to pay threshold. The tornado plot from one-way factor analysis indicates that the first two factors impacting the results are the utility values for severe COPD of UMEC/VI and FF/UMEC/VI. Probability sensitivity analysis indicates that FF/UMEC/VI compared to UMEC/VI can be considered a more cost-effective treatment at the willingness to pay threshold of $35,806.96. CONCLUSION: The triple therapy (FF/UMEC/VI) is more affordable than dual therapy (UMEC/VI) when compared to China's three times GDP per capita criterion.