Evaluating Postoperative Outcomes and Investigating the Usefulness of EU-TIRADS Scoring in Managing Pediatric Thyroid Nodules Bethesda 3 and 4

Objective: The aim was to assess postoperative outcomes in pediatric thyroid nodules with atypia of undetermined significance (AUS/FLUS) or suspicious for a follicular neoplasm (SFN) and their respective the European-Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (EU-TIRADS) scores. Methods: Forty-four pediatric patients at a single center with thyroid nodules classified as AUS/FLUS or SFN from August 2019 to December 2022 were retrospectively reviewed. Data on demographics, thyroid function, nodule size, and ultrasonographic features were collected. Postoperative pathologies were categorized into benign, low-risk, and malignant neoplasms according to the World Health Organization 2022 criteria, and EU-TIRADS was used for retrospective radiological scoring. Results: Among 21 (47.7%) of patients who had surgical intervention, 72% had Bethesda 3 and 28% had Bethesda 4 thyroid nodules. Post-surgical histopathological classifications were 43% benign, 19% low-risk, and 38% malignant. Of note, EU-TIRADS 3 and 5 scores were present in 44% and 56% of the benign cases, respectively. Malignant cases tended to produce higher EU-TIRADS scores, with 64% rated as EU-TIRADS 5. Bethesda category 4 nodules had a 66% malignancy rate, significantly higher than the 27% in category 3. Conclusion: A substantial proportion of histologically benign cases were classified as EU-TIRADS 5, suggesting that EU-TIRADS may lead to unnecessary biopsies in benign cases. Malignant cases were more likely to have a higher EU-TIRADS score, indicating a positive correlation with malignancy risk, particularly in Bethesda 4 cases. However, the EU-TIRADS system's predictive value for malignancy in Bethesda 3 cases was poorer.

An economically efficient strategy for diagnosing atypia of undetermined significance or follicular lesion of undetermined significance thyroid nodules with ultrasound-based risk stratification systems and BRAFV600E testing.

Background: The management of thyroid nodules classified as atypia of undetermined significance or follicular lesion of undetermined significance (AUS/FLUS) has been a subject of ongoing debate. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate a cost-effective approach for managing these nodules by combining BRAFV600E mutation analysis with the guidelines provided by the American Thyroid Association (ATA) or the American College of Radiology (ACR) Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (TIRADS). Methods: This study included 762 AUS/FLUS nodules in 551 patients with a postoperative pathology. A preoperative BRAFV600E gene test and an evaluation using the ATA guidelines and ACR-TIRADS were performed. Two combined diagnostic approaches were employed: In method 1, all nodules underwent BRAFV600E gene testing, and nodules testing positive for BRAFV600E or for risk stratification systems (RSSs) were diagnosed as malignant, while those with negative results in both tests were considered benign. In method 2 (modified combination method), nodules were reclassified into low-risk (category 2 and 3 in the ATA guidelines and ACR-TIRADS), medium-risk (category 4), and high-risk (category 5) groups based on the malignancy rate of the RSSs. BRAFV600E gene testing was applied only with the medium-risk group. Nodules with positive BRAFV600E mutation were upgraded to the high-risk group, while negative cases remained in the medium-risk group. Results: Both malignancy rates and positive BRAFV600E mutation rates increased with the increase in RSS category (P<0.001). The combination of ACR with BRAFV600E gene testing significantly improved the area under the curve (AUC) compared to the use of ACR or BRAFV600E alone (the AUCs for ACR combined with BRAFV600E, modified ACR combined with BRAFV600E, ACR alone, and BRAFV600E alone were 0.875, 0.878, 0.832, and 0.839, respectively; P<0.05 for both combinations vs. ACR or BRAFV600E alone). Similarly, ATA combined with BRAFV600E showed significant improvements in AUC compared to ATA alone (the AUCs for ATA combined with BRAFV600E, modified ATA combined with BRAFV600E, and ATA alone were 0.851, 0.846, 0.809, respectively; P<0.001 for both combination methods vs. ATA alone), but there was no significant difference observed compared to using BRAFV600E alone (P=0.450 and P=0.680 for both combination methods vs. BRAFV600E). Notably, the AUC of ACR combined with BRAFV600E was greater than that of ATA combined with BRAFV600E (P=0.047 and P=0.007 for both combination methods, respectively). There were no significant differences in diagnostic performance between the two combination approaches (P=0.428 for ACR combined with BRAFV600E and P=0.314 for ATA combined with BRAFV600E). Performing BRAFV600E gene testing only on the medium-risk groups (modified combination method) significantly reduced the rate of BRAFV600E gene testing (P<0.001) without increasing the false-negative rate (P=0.818 and P=0.394 for ACR and ATA, respectively). Conclusions: Incorporating the BRAFV600E gene test exclusively for nodules in the medium-risk group significantly improved diagnostic efficacy, reduced the utilization of gene tests, and maintained a consistent false-negative rate.

Two-tier subclassification of the Bethesda category III (atypia of undetermined significance/follicular lesion of undetermined significance) in thyroid cytology.

BACKGROUND: The Bethesda category III, AUS/FLUS, comprises a heterogeneous group of thyroid lesions with variable risk of malignancy (ROM). This study evaluates ROM in two subgroups of this category based on nuclear atypia and architectural atypia. METHODS: Cases in Bethesda category III were reported based on nuclear atypia (AUS) and architectural atypia (FLUS). ROM was calculated by comparing the cytologic diagnosis to the follow-up histologic diagnosis. RESULTS: Among the 610 Bethesda category III cases in this study, 306 (50.2%) and 304 (49.8%) cases were reported as AUS and FLUS, respectively. One hundred and eighty six of 306 AUS (60.8%) and 193 of 304 FLUS (63.5%) cases underwent surgical intervention. ROM of the cases in Bethesda category III was 12.8% if all cases were counted and 20.6% if only surgical cases were counted. When analyzing separately, ROM of AUS cases was 17.0% and 28.0% with all cases and surgical cases only, respectively. For FLUS cases, ROM was 8.6% and 13.5% with all cases and surgical cases only, respectively. CONCLUSION: In Bethesda category III, ROM in the cases with nuclear atypia was significantly higher than the cases with architectural atypia. Sub-classifying the Bethesda Category III cases with nuclear atypia and architectural atypia, respectively may better stratify the ROM.

Weighty Matters: The Obesity-Thyroid Nodule Connection Unveiling the Impact of Obesity on Thyroid Cancer Risk.

Background and Objectives: The effect of obesity on the development/progression of thyroid nodules with uncertain cytology is unknown. Therefore, our objective was to assess the role of body mass index (BMI) in predicting malignancy in patients with atypia of undetermined significance/follicular lesion of undetermined significance (AUS/FLUS) nodules. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 113 patients with available BMI data and final histopathology of benign or differentiated thyroid cancer. Patients were classified into four groups based on BMI: <18.5 (underweight), 18.5-24.9 (normal weight), 25-29.9 (overweight), and ≥30 (obesity) kg/m2. The association between risk of malignancy and BMI was examined for all data and subgroups based on nodule size, sex, and age. Results: Overall, 44.2% were obese, 36.3% were ≥45 years, and 75.4% were women. Final pathological results showed malignant nodules in 52 patients (46%) and benign nodules in 61 patients (54%) (mean age: 41 ± 11.6 vs. 39.9 ± 11.7 years; p = 0.62). Men had more malignant nodules than benign nodules (32.7% vs. 16.4%, p < 0.05). Overall, no significant correlation was identified between the risk of thyroid cancer and BMI, and the risk of malignancy was not significantly different between obese men and women (p = 0.4). However, in individuals with BMI < 30 kg/m2 (non-obese group), malignant nodules were more frequent in men than in women (71% vs. 41%, p = 0.04). No significant difference was observed in mean nodule size between the benign and malignant groups. Furthermore, BMI was not related to increased risk of malignancy in multiple logistic regression models using all data, even after controlling for confounding variables (odds ratio, 0.99, 95% confidence interval: 0.93-1.06, p = 0.87) or when stratifying by sex. Conclusions: Our study showed no correlation between obesity and thyroid cancer in patients with AUS/FLUS. Moreover, men had more malignant nodules than benign nodules. Further well-designed prospective studies are required to confirm our findings.

Current controversies in the management of patients with indeterminate thyroid nodules.

The management of cytologically indeterminate thyroid nodules remains debatable as their malignancy is difficult to establish. Most nodules have benign postoperative histology, but an accurate assessment of their proclivity for malignant transformation is crucial. Numerous studies have investigated the effects of various tools, including clinical, radiological, and cytological features, as well as biochemical and molecular markers, on the management of these heterogeneous nodules. Collectively, strategies aim to treat malignant nodules and avoid unnecessary surgery for asymptomatic benign nodules. Currently, no clear guidelines for the optimal management of cytologically indeterminate thyroid nodules exist to determine whether a conservative approach with long-term observation or surgical intervention should be selected. Thus, personalized approaches have been recommended. Large-scale multicenter prospective studies are needed to elucidate controversial issues. As this topic has not been comprehensively covered based on publications from the Gulf region, this review aims to shed light on remaining controversies.

The influence of papillary features on the risk of malignancy in thyroid nodules diagnosed as atypia of undetermined significance or follicular lesion of undetermined significance.

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to the assess the risk of malignancy in thyroid lesions that were diagnosed as AUS/FLUS when using a novel cytology subclassification system that is based on the presence or absence of papillary features. METHODS: AUS/FLUS case cytology was re-reviewed and subclassified into minor or major concern groups based upon the absence or presence of papillary features, respectively. The risk of malignancy (ROM) was calculated and compared between the two groups. Inter-pathologist agreement in case subclassification was also measured. RESULTS: The minor concern group had a 12.6% associated ROM, while the major concern group had a significantly higher ROM (58.4%), (P < 0.001). Based on 108 cases, the inter-pathologist agreement in case subclassification was 79%, and the κ value was 0.47. CONCLUSIONS: The identification of papillary features significantly increases the ROM in thyroid lesions with an AUS/FLUS diagnosis.

The impact of thyroid imaging reporting and data system on the management of Bethesda III thyroid nodules.

Objectives: Atypia of undetermined significance (AUS) or follicular lesion of undetermined significance (FLUS) is a heterogeneous category of fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC); the management of this condition remains controversial. The clinical significance of such patients relies on the exclusion of malignancy. In this study, we aimed to determine the validity of the American College of Radiology Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (ACR TI-RADS) (2017) for predicting malignancy in this specific category of patients. Methods: In this study, we analysed a cohort of patients from our previous retrospective study. This four-year retrospective cohort study included all cases undergoing surgery with a cytological diagnosis of AUS/FLUS. We enrolled 110 cases with documented final histopathological diagnoses and ultrasound examinations. Results: The study included 83 females (75.5%) and 27 males (24.5%). The overall risk of malignancy (ROM) for AUS/FLUS thyroid nodules was 47.3%. The ROMs of TI-RADS 3 (TR3), TI-RADS 4 (TR4), and TI-RADS 5 (TR5) were 43.5%, 49.4% and 40%, respectively. There was no significant association between TI-RADS and final pathological analysis. Conclusions: Repeated FNAC with initial AUS/FLUS nodules is crucial. Our findings showed that ACR TI-RADS did not contribute to the cancer risk stratification of AUS/FLUS nodules. A large prospective multi-institutional study is now required to determine the validity of ACR TI-RADS and whether other adjunct clinical, cytological, molecular, or biochemical tools could facilitate the management of patients with these heterogeneous nodules.

An artificial neural network for the prediction of the risk of malignancy in category III Bethesda thyroid lesions.

BACKGROUND: The diagnosis of cases of atypia of undetermined significance/follicular lesion of undetermined significance (AUS/FLUS) by fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) is challenging for both cytopathologists and clinicians. It is extremely difficult to predict the risk of malignancy based on cytological features alone. AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: In this study, we attempted to construct an artificial neural network (ANN) model to predict the risk of malignancy in FNAC cases of AUS/FLUS in thyroid lesions based on cytological features. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We included two groups of AUS/FLUS cases: (1) 29 cases of histopathologically proven malignancy, and (2) 32 cases that had either been histopathologically proven to be benign, or for which no progress of malignancy on follow-up had been observed in the last 2 years. Cytological characteristics were analysed semi-quantitatively by two independent observers (TS and PD). Based on these data, we tried to generate an artificial neural network (ANN) model to differentiate between malignant and benign cases. The performance of the ANN was assessed using the confusion matrix and receiving operator curve. RESULTS: There were 29 malignant cases of AUS/FLUS (histopathologically proven) and 32 benign/follow-up cases in this study. There were 41 cases in the training set, 9 cases in the validation set and 11 cases in the test set. In the test group, the ANN model successfully distinguished between all benign (5/5) and malignant cases (6/6). The area under the receiver operating curve was 1. CONCLUSION: The present ANN model is well structured and coherent to distinguish malignant from benign outcomes in AUS/FLUS cases on cytology smears with no error. This is an open-ended ANN model, and additional parameters and more cases could be included to make the model more robust.

Assessment of Preoperative TSH Serum Level and Thyroid Cancer Occurrence in Patients with AUS/FLUS Thyroid Nodule Diagnosis.

Thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) is a growth factor associated with the initiation and progression of well-differentiated thyroid cancer (WDTC). Atypia of undetermined significance and follicular lesion of undetermined significance (AUS/FLUS) are the most uncertain cytological diagnoses of thyroid nodules. The aim of the study was to determine the association of histopathological diagnosis with preoperative serum TSH levels in patients with AUS/FLUS thyroid nodule diagnosis. Among 5028 individuals with thyroid nodules, 342 (6.8%) with AUS/FLUS diagnoses were analyzed. The frequency of all histopathology diagnoses was assessed for associations with preoperative serum TSH levels. The median TSH concentration was significantly higher in patients with AUS/FLUS diagnosis and histopathology of WDTC than in patients with the same cytology result and histopathology of a benign tumor (p < 0.0001). The diagnostic potential of serum TSH level was determined to evaluate risk of malignancy in patients with thyroid nodules classified into the Bethesda III category. ROC analysis showed the TSH concentration at a cutoff point of 2.5 mIU/L to be an acceptable prognostic factor for WDTC. For this optimal cutoff point, the AUC was 0.877, the sensitivity was 0.830, and the specificity was 0.902. Preoperative serum TSH levels in patients with AUS/FLUS thyroid tumor diagnosis should be taken into consideration in the decision-making process and clinical management.

Fine-needle aspiration cytology repetition in thyroid nodules with non-diagnostic findings or atypia of undetermined significance/follicular lesions of undetermined significance: Does time matters?

INTRODUCTION: After a nondiagnostic (ND) result or findings of atypia of undetermined significance/follicular lesion of undetermined significance (AUS/FLUS), the current recommendation is for fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) of the thyroid nodule to be repeated after at least 3 months. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether the interval between FNACs has any influence on the final cytological diagnosis. METHODS: This was a retrospective study including all patients who underwent FNAC for the first time between January 2016 and December 2019 with ND or AUS/FLUS cytological results and then underwent a second FNAC procedure. Demographic, clinical, ultrasound and cytological data were retrieved. 1,497 nodules were evaluated; 535 had a first FNAC result of ND or AUS/FLUS, and 246 of these were re-evaluated with a second FNAC. The cases were grouped according to the timing of the repeat FNAC in two different analyses: < vs. ≥ 3 months and < vs. ≥ 6 months after initial FNAC. RESULTS: Two hundred forty-six repeat FNACs were performed in 186 patients (76% female, median age 59.5 years). Twenty-two of these procedures (8.9%) were performed within 3 months, and 115 (46.2%) within 6 months of the first FNAC. Second FNAC findings were ND in 121 (49.2%) cases, benign in 103 (41.9%), AUS/FLUS in 8 (3.3%), follicular neoplasm/suspicious follicular neoplasm in 9 (3.7%), suspicious malignancy in 4 (1.6%) and malignancy in 1 (0.4%). Early repetition of FNAC did not significantly influence the final cytological result (< 3 vs. ≥ 3 months, P=0.51; and <6 vs. ≥ 6 months, P=0.20). CONCLUSION: This study suggests that the interval in repeat FNAC procedures is not relevant to overall diagnostic performance.

The predictive value of hematologic parameters in the risk of thyroid malignancy in cases with atypia/follicular lesion of undetermined significance.

BACKGROUND: Atypia/follicular lesion of undetermined significance (AUS/FLUS) is still the most challenging category in the Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology. Therefore, the aim of the current study was to investigate the value of the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and mean platelet volume (MPV) in predicting malignancy in cases with AUS/FLUS nodules. METHODS: A total of 200 patients with AUS/FLUS nodules who underwent thyroidectomy were included in this study. Preoperative hemogram parameters, ultrasonographic findings, fine-needle aspiration results, and postoperative final histopathological diagnoses of the patients were recorded retrospectively. RESULTS: Thyroid malignancies were detected in 122 of the patients (61.0%). Patients in the benign group (BG) were older than those in the malignancy group (MG) (52.0 ± 11.3 vs. 45.9 ± 12.3 years, p < 0.001). The median TSH values of the two groups were comparable. Statistically significant differences were obtained between the two groups in respect of mean WBC of 7.53 ± 1.44 in MG and 6.87 ± 1.35 (103/mm3) in BG, mean neutrophil of 4.65 ± 1.12 in MG and 3.95 ± 0.99 (103/mm3) in BG, and median NLR of 2.18 (0.71-4.57) in MG and 1.75 (0.80-3.42) in BG (p < 0.001). The median PLR and MPV values of the two groups were similar. When NLR cut-off point was designated as 2.24, the accuracy of NLR in distinguishing malignancy from the benign condition was 0.65 in ROC analysis (area under the curve, 0.665; specificity, 0.808; sensitivity, 0.492). CONCLUSION: High NLR values may provide limited help in predicting thyroid malignancy in the AUS/FLUS nodule population, while PLR and MPV are not reliable parameters.

Atypia and Follicular Lesions of Undetermined Significance in Subsequent Biopsy Result: What Clinicians Need to Know.

Atypia and follicular lesions of undetermined significance (AUS/FLUS) is the most controversial category of The Bethesda System. The risk of malignancy (ROM) in this group is estimated as 5-15%, however, the occurrence of two or more subsequent biopsy results with AUS/FLUS diagnosis makes these clinical situations more complex. We evaluated the ROM and prognostic value of aggressive ultrasound (US) features in 342 patients with thyroid nodules (TNs) with subsequent biopsy results of AUS/FLUS. We assessed US features and compared them with the final histopathological diagnosis. Overall, 121 (35.4%) individuals after first AUS/FLUS diagnosis underwent surgery and 221 (64.6%) patients had repeated biopsies. The ROM after first, second, and third biopsies with subsequent AUS/FLUS diagnosis were 7.4%, 18.5%, and 38.4% respectively. We demonstrated significantly higher rates of occurrence of aggressive US features in patients with malignancy (p < 0.0001). The age <55 years old was also a significant risk factor for TC (p = 0.044). Significant associations were found between aggressive US features and malignancy in patients after first diagnosis of AUS/FLUS (p < 0.05). The juxtaposition of US features with the number of biopsy repetitions of TN with consecutive AUS/FLUS diagnoses may simplify the decision-making process in surgical management. Two or three consecutive biopsy results with AUS/FLUS diagnosis increases the ROM.

Subclassification of the Bethesda Category III (AUS/FLUS): A study of thyroid FNA cytology based on ThinPrep slides from the National Cancer Center in China.

BACKGROUND: The atypia of an undetermined significance/follicular lesion of undetermined significance (AUS/FLUS) category in the Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology (TBSRTC) is a heterogeneous category, which includes various cell patterns. The subclassification of AUS/FLUS was suggested in the 2017 TBSRTC. However, the risk of malignancy (ROM) associated with different subgroups remains unresolved. Herein, AUS/FLUS aspirates were subclassified, from which the ROM of each subgroup was determined. METHODS: All cases undergoing fine-needle aspiration (FNA) from July 2013 to December 2018 were reviewed. Of 12,913 thyroid FNAs, 1053 (8.2%) were AUS/FLUS. The slides of 222 patients with AUS/FLUS with surgical follow-up were reviewed and subclassified according to the recommendations of the 2017 TBSRTC. There were 195 aspirates consistently diagnosed as AUS/FLUS and subclassified as cytologic atypia 1 (AUS-C1); cytologic atypia 2 (AUS-C2); architectural atypia (AUS-A); cytologic and architectural atypia (AUS-C&A); Hürthle cell aspirates (AUS-H); atypia, not otherwise specified (AUS-NOS); and atypical lymphoid cells, rule out lymphoma (AUS-L). RESULTS: Malignancy was identified in 83.3% (185 of 222) of the AUS/FLUS nodules. The AUS-C1 group was the most common (62.1%), followed by the AUS-C&A (12.8%), AUS-C2 (10.8%), AUS-H (6.7%), AUS-NOS (5.6%), AUS-L (1.5%), and AUS-A (0.5%) groups. AUS-C1 had the highest ROM (92.6%) among the groups and varied significantly from that of the AUS-C&A (P = .171), AUS-C2 (P = .001), AUS-H (P = .001), and AUS-NOS (P < .001) groups. CONCLUSIONS: As a heterogeneous category of TBSRTC, the ROM for AUS/FLUS varies greatly among medical centers. Subclassification of AUS/FLUS might be helpful in identifying nodules with a high ROM in this category and improving the management of such nodules.

Performance of Afirma genomic sequencing classifier vs gene expression classifier in Bethesda category III thyroid nodules: An institutional experience.

BACKGROUND: Afirma gene expression classifier (GEC) is an adjunct to thyroid fine needle aspiration shown to improve pre-operative risk assessment and reduce unnecessary surgery of indeterminate thyroid nodules. Genomic sequencing classifier (GSC) is a newer version aiming to improve specificity and positive predictive value (PPV) of Afirma testing. There are limited studies comparing GSC vs GEC. This study was undertaken to compare these classifiers in terms of diagnostic performance and effect on clinical management of indeterminate thyroid nodules. METHODS: The study cohort consisted of patients with thyroid nodules that had a recurrent cytologic diagnosis of atypia of undetermined significance/follicular lesion of undetermined significance (AUS/FLUS) and were tested by either GEC or GSC. Patient demographics, nodule size, and clinical follow-up were recorded. Benign call rate (BCR) of Afirma testing, rate of subsequent surgery (RSS), rate of histology-confirmed malignancy (RHM), as well as diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, PPV, negative predicative value (NPV), and accuracy were calculated and compared between GSC and GEC cohorts. RESULTS: Among 264 AUS/FLUS thyroid nodules, 127 and 137 were tested with GEC and GSC, respectively. Compared to GEC, GSC demonstrated increased BCR (77.3% vs 52%), decreased RSS (31.4% vs 51.2%), greater RHM (29% vs 9.8%) associated with a suspicious Afirma result, as well as improved specificity (82.8% vs 54.5%), PPV (29% vs 9.8%), and diagnostic accuracy (83.9% vs 56.7%), while maintaining high sensitivity and NPV. CONCLUSION: Afirma GSC substantially improved BCR, RSS, RHM, and diagnostic performance, enhancing appropriate triage and thereby helped avoid unnecessary surgery in AUS/FLUS thyroid nodules.

Outcome of atypia of undetermined significance/follicular lesion of undetermined significance in thyroid fine-needle aspirations: A six-year institutional experience.

BACKGROUND: Atypia of undetermined significance/follicular lesion of undetermined significance (AUS/FLUS) is one of six diagnostic categories of The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology (BSRTC). The goal of our study is to assess the outcome of cases classified as AUS/FLUS at our institution. METHODS: AUS/FLUS cases were identified by computer searching of the thyroid fine-needle aspiration (FNA) cases performed between 2010 and 2016. Outcomes were categorized as: follow-up surgery, repeat FNA or no follow-up available. Demographics, ultrasound findings and FNA diagnostic criteria were reviewed for AUS/FLUS cases with follow-up surgical pathology diagnosis. RESULTS: Our AUS/FLUS thyroid FNA rate was 6% (117 out of 1984 FNAs). Only 15% of the AUS/FLUS cases had repeat FNA, while 41% underwent surgery. The risk of malignancy (ROM) for cases with follow-up surgery was 17%. When considering all AUS/FLUS cases, the ROM was 7%. Statistically, benign neoplasms were more likely to be single lesions on ultrasound comparing to malignant neoplasms, and to exhibit architectural atypia as opposed to non-neoplastic lesions on FNA. The malignancy rates among patients that directly went to surgical resection (17%) and patients having repeat FNA after the first AUS/FLUS diagnosis followed by surgery (29%) was not significantly different. However, repeat FNA was able to reclassify the majority of cases into more definitive categories. CONCLUSION: The outcome of the thyroid FNAs diagnosed as AUS/FLUS in our institution meets the benchmark statistics for AUS/FLUS rate and ROM. This study constitutes a valuable quality assurance measure and serves as a baseline for subsequent quality improvement.

Cytological Sub-Classification of Atypia of Undetermined Significance May Predict Malignancy Risk in Thyroid Nodules.

BACKGROUND: Atypia/follicular lesion of undetermined significance (AUS/FLUS) carries a malignancy risk reaching up to 50%. Based on the reported malignancy rate in a given population, the clinical practice towards such a category varies. We hereby identify clinical parameters for risk stratification to aid in decision-making for either surgical referral or a clinical follow-up. Our aim is to identify clinical parameters that guided both clinicians and patients at our institutions to reach a clinical decision including atypia types. METHODS: A retrospective review of patients with Bethesda III category thyroid nodules from tertiary centres in the Emirate of Abu Dhabi during January 2011 through December 2015 was carried out. Malignancy risk in Bethesda category III nodules and repeat FNA utility were calculated. Parameters that guided both clinicians and patients for appropriate referral to surgery were studied. RESULTS: Two hundred and two cases were included in the study. Of these, 101 cases underwent surgery initially following the first FNA and 10 cases following FNA repeat. Histology confirmed malignancy in (41%) of cases that went initially to surgery and in (40%) of cases that underwent a repeat FNA. Repeat FNA resulted in 17 (44.74%) cases being re-classified into benign category, 10 (26.3%) being AUS/FLUS category, 6 (15.7%) being both suspicious and malignant, and 5 (13.16%) being unsatisfactory. Repeating FNA resulted in a definitive diagnostic utility in 50% of the cases. Eighty percent of malignant cases demonstrated nuclear atypia. CONCLUSION: The relatively high malignancy rate in our institutions, the suspicious radiographic features, the atypia groups, and the repeat FNA predictive value stratified Bethesda III category nodules for proper malignancy prediction and appropriate management.

Thyroid cytology in Pakistan: An institutional audit of the atypia of undetermined significance/follicular lesion of undetermined significance category.

INTRODUCTION: Fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC), along with thyroid ultrasound, is an important tool in evaluation of thyroid nodules that helps in further management of these patients in making a decision of surgical intervention vs follow-up. The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology category III of atypia of undetermined significance/follicular lesion of undetermined significance (AUS/FLUS) has risk of malignancy (ROM) ranging from 5% to 15%. The aim of the present study was to describe the frequency of AUS/FLUS in thyroid gland FNACs and the surgical outcomes of these cases. METHODS: The integrated laboratory management system retrieved the thyroid FNACs from 2010 to 2018 and subsequent surgical pathology specimens. For the AUS/FLUS cases, data regarding patient demographics, cytology and histological diagnoses were recorded. The results were tabulated as the overall frequency of AUS/FLUS in thyroid FNACs, cytohistological correlation (benign and malignant) and ROM. RESULTS: Over a period of 9 years, 256 (10.9%) cases out of 2342 thyroid FNACs were reported as AUS/FLUS at our institution. Mean age was 43.5 years. The majority (70.3%) of patients were female. Seventy-two of 104 resection specimens (69.2%) were reported as benign and 32 cases (30.7%) had malignant diagnosis. Upper-bound ROM was 30.7% (32 cases with malignant diagnosis out of 104 resection specimens). Lower-bound ROM was calculated as 12.5% (32 cases with malignant diagnosis out of 256 total AUS diagnosis). CONCLUSION: The AUS/FLUS category of thyroid cytology and associated ROM remain an evolving area. Individual institutions should monitor the frequency and include ROM in the dashboard indicators to remain within the recommended range.

An institutional experience: A retrospective analysis of the effect of transitioning from follicular lesion of undetermined significance to atypia of undetermined significance with subclassified atypia on interobserver concordance, rates of neoplasia, and rates of malignancy.

INTRODUCTION: The rate of malignancy (ROM) in thyroid fine needle aspirations (FNA) classified under "atypia of undetermined significance (AUS)/follicular lesion of undetermined significance (FLUS), including Hürthle cell type (HLUS)" category of The Bethesda system for reporting thyroid cytopathology (TBSRTC) in literature is highly variable. The 2018 TBSRTC was updated to note a preferred categorization of AUS cases into subcategories. This study evaluates the impact of AUS subclassification on rates of neoplasia (RON), rates of malignancy (ROM), and cytopathologist (CP) concordance. METHODS: 93 thyroid FNAs previously diagnosed as FLUS or HLUS from January 1, 2013 to December 31, 2014 with subsequent surgical resection were identified. Four CPs reclassified these cases using TBSRTC AUS subcategories of follicular cells with architectural and/or cytologic atypia, predominantly Hürthle cells, and atypical lymphocytes. RON and ROM were calculated for each diagnostic subcategory for each CP. RESULTS: The original RON and ROM for FLUS cases were 31.4% and 15.1% and were 77.8% and 22.2% for HLUS cases. 10.8% of cases showed diagnostic concordance amongst the four CPs. The most frequently utilized subcategory was architectural atypia. RON ranges for architectural atypia, cytologic atypia, architectural and cytologic atypia, and predominantly Hürthle cells were 28.1% to 35.7%, 0% to 33.3%, 35.3% to 66.7%, and 57.1% to 87.5%. The range of ROM was 13.9% to 16.7%, 0% to 33%, 0% to 42.9%, and 0% to 25%, respectively. CONCLUSION: RON for AUS predominantly Hürthle cells subcategory was higher than previously reported, which may indicate use for tailored patient management pathways. AUS subclassification can result in significant interobserver variability. Therefore, institutions may consider consensus/quality control sessions to optimize diagnostic concordance.

ThyroSeq v3 for Bethesda III and IV: An institutional experience.

BACKGROUND: The ThyroSeq v3 genomic classifier is a commercial molecular test that examines a wide spectrum of genomic alterations in a thyroid fine-needle aspiration (FNA) sample and reports test results as either negative or positive. The authors report their institutional experience with ThyroSeq v3. METHODS: Thyroid FNA specimens diagnosed as either atypia of undetermined significance or follicular lesion of undetermined significance (AUS/FLUS) (Bethesda category III [Bethesda III] according to The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology) or follicular neoplasm/suspicious for follicular neoplasm (FN/SFN) (Bethesda IV) that had ThyroSeq v3 results available from December 2017 through October 2019 were retrieved for analysis. FNA diagnoses were correlated with ThyroSeq v3 results and follow-up histopathology. RESULTS: In total, 415 cases (AUS/FLUS, n = 251; FN/SFN, n = 164) were retrieved: 294 (71%) were reported as ThyroSeq v3-negative, and 121 (29%) were reported as ThyroSeq v3-positive. The benign call rate (BCR) of ThyroSeq v3 for AUS/FLUS (82%; 206 of 251 cases) was significantly higher (P < .001) than that for FN/SFN (BCR, 54%; 88 of 164 cases). Histopathologic follow-up was available for 127 cases (ThyroSeq v3-positive, 96; ThyroSeq v3-negative, 31), of which 57 were benign and 70 were malignant (including noninvasive follicular thyroid neoplasm with papillary-like nuclear features). The negative predictive value of ThyroSeq v3 was significantly higher for AUS/FLUS (99.5%) than for FN/SFN (95.4%; P < .0294), given malignancy rates of 10% for AUS/FLUS and 30% for FN/SFN. Forty-five unique combinations of genetic alterations were detected in the operated ThyroSeq-positive cases, and there were only 5 false-negative cases, comprised of 4 low-risk neoplasms. CONCLUSIONS: The high BCR of ThyroSeq v3 for AUS/FLUS prevents surgery in a majority of patients. The ThyroSeq v3 genomic classifier reveals the complexity of the genetic signature of indeterminate nodules.