Susceptibility to lenacapavir, fostemsavir and broadly neutralizing antibodies in French primary HIV-1 infected patients in 2020-2023.

Surveillance studies of Transmitted Drug Resistance (TDR) are crucial in tracking the evolution of HIV epidemiology. Our aim was to investigate TDR to nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs), non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs), protease inhibitors (PIs), integrase inhibitors (INIs), as well as to new drugs: lenacapavir, fostemsavir. Predictive sensitivity was evaluated for maraviroc and broadly neutralizing antibodies (bNAbs) (zinlirvimab and teropavimab). Between 2020 and 2023, 85 people with HIV (PWH) were diagnosed with primary HIV-1 infection (PHI). Pol and env sequences were analyzed and TDR was characterized according to the French ANRS algorithm. The genotypic-based prediction of bNAbs sensitivity was based on HIV env amino acid signatures I108, I201, F353 for teropavimab and N325, N332, H330 for zinlirvimab. TDR to NRTIs, NNRTIs, PIs and INIs was evidenced in 8.2%, 12.9%, 4.7%, and 5.9% strains, respectively. Ten viruses were CXCR4/dual mix. All viruses were susceptible to lenacapavir (100%) and 52% harbored resistance to fostemsavir. The genotypic profile was associated with a predictive positive value (PPV) > 83% of susceptibility to both teropavimab and zinlirvimab for 23 viruses (31%), while 22 (29%) had a PPV between 62% and 75%, suggesting reduced susceptibility to both bNAbs as soon as primary infection. The surveillance of TDR evidenced at the time of PHI is important with regard to new strategies for HIV patients with virological failure and global implementation of PrEP using NRTI, INI such as recently approved injectable cabotegravir, and future long-acting drugs such as lenacapavir and bNAbs.

Inflammatory Biomarker Reduction With Fostemsavir Over 96 Weeks in Heavily Treatment-Experienced Adults With Multidrug-Resistant HIV-1 in the BRIGHTE Study.

Background: Fostemsavir, a first-in-class attachment inhibitor that binds to the viral envelope protein gp120, is approved for heavily treatment-experienced persons with HIV-1 with limited treatment options. We explored changes in immunologic and coagulopathy parameters in the BRIGHTE study: a phase 3 trial that evaluated fostemsavir plus optimized background therapy in heavily treatment-experienced adults with multidrug-resistant HIV-1. Methods: CD4+ T-cell count, CD4+/CD8+ ratio, soluble CD14, soluble CD163, and D-dimer levels were measured through 96 weeks in participants with 1 or 2 fully active antiretroviral agents available at screening. No formal statistical analyses were performed. Results: Among 272 participants, increases were observed from baseline to week 96 in CD4+ T-cell count (mean increase, +205 cells/mm3) and CD4+/CD8+ ratio (mean increase, +0.24). The proportion of observed participants with a CD4+/CD8+ ratio ≥0.45 increased from 9% (25/272) at baseline to 40% (85/213) at week 96. From baseline to week 96, we also observed trends toward decreases in the following (mean [SD] change): soluble CD14, -738.2 (981.8) µg/L; soluble CD163, -138.0 (193.4) µg/L; and D-dimer, -0.099 (0.521) mg/L fibrinogen-equivalent units. Decreases in biomarkers were generally observed among subgroups by baseline disease characteristics, virologic response, and CD4+ T-cell count. Conclusions: These data suggest that heavily treatment-experienced persons with multidrug-resistant HIV-1 treated with fostemsavir + optimized background therapy may have improvements in immune parameters, including markers of monocyte activation and coagulopathy. Clinical Trials Registration: NCT02362503 (ClinicalTrials.gov; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT02362503).

A Narrative Review of Novel Agents for Managing Heavily Treatment-Experienced People Living With HIV.

Objective: The objective of this review is to compare ibalizumab, fostemsavir, and lenacapavir, present the clinical trials evaluating each agent, and provide guidance on their use in highly-treatment experienced (HTE) population living with HIV (PWH). Data sources: A search of PubMed and clinicaltrials.gov was conducted using the search terms: ibalizumab, fostemsavir, and lenacapavir. Study selection and data extraction: English-language, clinical publications were included. Data synthesis: Ibalizumab, fostemsavir, and lenacapavir, are each first-in-class agents, that have major differences in mechanism of action, route and frequency of administration, pharmacokinetic parameters, including elimination half-life, potential for drug-drug interactions, safety profiles, and cost. Each has been shown, when combined with an optimized background regimen (OBR) with at least one other active agent, to achieve virologic suppression in HTE-PWH. Conclusion: In HTE-patients, adding ibalizumab, fostemsavir, and/or lenacapavir to at least one other active agent can lead to virologic suppression in this difficult to treat population. Monotherapy with any of these agents is not recommended and will lead to a high likelihood of drug resistance. Selection of which agent(s) to include with an OBR will depend on other patient factors including concomitant medications, acceptance of formulations (oral vs. subcutaneous vs. intravenous infusion), and potential access (both insurance-based and transportation). Adherence to all agents in the regimen is paramount to successful outcomes.

Immunological and virological response to fostemsavir in routine US clinical care: An OPERA cohort study.

OBJECTIVES: Fostemsavir is a novel attachment inhibitor used with other antiretrovirals in heavily treatment-experienced (HTE) adults with multidrug-resistant HIV-1. Real-world immunological and virological responses were assessed in individuals starting fostemsavir in the OPERA cohort. METHODS: Among adults with HIV-1 starting fostemsavir between 2 July 2020 and 1 September 2022, 6-month and 12-month changes in CD4 T-cell count and CD4%, and maintenance/achievement of viral load (VL) <50 copies/mL were described and stratified by baseline VL (suppressed: <50 copies/mL; viraemic: ≥50 copies/mL) and CD4 count (high: ≥350 cells/µL; low: <350 cells/µL). RESULTS: Of 182 individuals starting fostemsavir, 64% were viraemic (34% low CD4, 30% high CD4) and 36% were suppressed (16% low CD4, 20% high CD4). The suppressed/low CD4 group had the largest median increases in CD4 count (6-month: 30 cells/µL [interquartile range {IQR} 9-66], 12-month: 66 cells/µL [IQR 17-125]), and CD4% (6-month: 1.0% [IQR -0.3-2.8], 12-month: 1.9% [IQR 1.3-3.9]). Regardless of baseline VL, those with a high baseline CD4 count experienced a greater variability in immunological response than those with low CD4 counts (12-month standard deviation range 172-231 cells/µL vs. 69-90 cells/µL). VL <50 copies/mL was maintained in most suppressed individuals; nearly half of the viraemic/high CD4 group and a third of the viraemic/low CD4 group achieved a VL <50 copies/mL at either timepoint. CONCLUSIONS: After 6 or 12 months of fostemsavir use, virological response was low in viraemic individuals, although most suppressed individuals did maintain suppression. While immunological response varied across individuals, virologically suppressed HTE individuals with low CD4 counts may benefit from immunological improvements with fostemsavir.

The sensitivity of HIV-1 gp120 polymorphs to inhibition by temsavir correlates to temsavir binding on-rate.

Temsavir binds directly to the HIV-1 envelope glycoprotein gp120 and selectively inhibits interactions between HIV-1 and CD4 receptors. Previous studies identified gp120 amino acid positions where substitutions are associated with reduced susceptibility to temsavir. The mechanism by which temsavir susceptibility is altered in these envelope glycoproteins was evaluated. Pseudoviruses encoding gp120 substitutions alone (S375H/I/M/N, M426L, M434I, M475I) or in combination (S375H + M475I) were engineered on a wild-type JRFL background. Temsavir-gp120 and CD4-gp120 binding kinetics and ability of temsavir to block CD4-gp120 binding were evaluated using the purified polymorphic gp120 proteins and a Creoptix® WAVE Delta grating-coupled interferometry system. Fold-change in half-maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) in JRFL-based pseudoviruses containing the aforementioned polymorphisms relative to that of wild-type ranged from 4-fold to 29,726-fold, while temsavir binding affinity for the polymorphic gp120 proteins varied from 0.7-fold to 73.7-fold relative to wild-type gp120. Strong correlations between temsavir IC50 and temsavir binding affinity (r = 0.7332; P = 0.0246) as well as temsavir binding on-rate (r = -0.8940; P = 0.0011) were observed. Binding affinity of gp120 proteins for CD4 varied between 0.4-fold and 3.1-fold compared with wild-type gp120; no correlations between temsavir IC50 and CD4 binding kinetic parameters were observed. For all polymorphic gp120 proteins, temsavir was able to fully block CD4 binding; 3 polymorphs required higher temsavir concentrations. Loss of susceptibility to temsavir observed for gp120 polymorphisms strongly correlated with reductions in temsavir binding on-rate. Nonetheless, temsavir retained the ability to fully block CD4-gp120 engagement given sufficiently high concentrations.

Characterization of clinical envelopes with lack of sensitivity to the HIV-1 inhibitors temsavir and ibalizumab.

Previous data suggest a lack of cross-resistance between the gp120-directed attachment inhibitor temsavir (active moiety of fostemsavir) and the CD4-directed post-attachment inhibitor ibalizumab. Recently, analysis of HIV-1 envelopes with reduced sensitivity to both inhibitors was undertaken to determine whether they shared genotypic correlates of resistance. Sequences from 2 envelopes with reduced susceptibility to both agents were mapped onto a temsavir-bound gp120 structure. Residues within 5.0 Å of the temsavir binding site were evaluated using reverse genetics. Broader applicability and contextual determinants of key substitutions were further assessed using envelopes from participants in the phase 3 BRIGHTE study. Temsavir sensitivity was measured by half-maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) and ibalizumab sensitivity by IC50 and maximum percent inhibition (MPI). One envelope required substitutions of E113D and T434M for full restoration of temsavir susceptibility. Neither substitution nor their combination affected ibalizumab sensitivity. However, in the second envelope, an E202 substitution (HXB2, T202) was sufficient for observed loss of susceptibility to both inhibitors. One BRIGHTE participant with no ibalizumab exposure had an emergent K202E substitution at protocol-defined virologic failure, with reduced sensitivity to both inhibitors. Introducing T202E into previously susceptible clinical isolates reduced temsavir potency by ≥ 40-fold and ibalizumab MPI from >99% to ∼80%. Interestingly, introduction of the gp120 V5 region from a highly ibalizumab-susceptible envelope mitigated the E202 effect on ibalizumab but not temsavir. A rare HIV-1 gp120 E202 mutation reduced temsavir susceptibility, and depending on sequence context, could result in reduced susceptibility to ibalizumab.

No dose adjustment of metformin or substrates of organic cation transporters (OCT)1 and OCT2 and multidrug and toxin extrusion protein (MATE)1/2K with fostemsavir coadministration based on modeling approaches.

Fostemsavir is an approved gp120-directed attachment inhibitor and prodrug for the treatment of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 infection in combination with other antiretrovirals (ARVs) in heavily treatment-experienced adults with multi-drug resistance, intolerance, or safety concerns with their current ARV regimen. Initial in vitro studies indicated that temsavir, the active moiety of fostemsavir, and its metabolites, inhibited organic cation transporter (OCT)1, OCT2, and multidrug and toxin extrusion transporters (MATEs) at tested concentration of 100 uM, although risk assessment based on the current Food and Drug Administration in vitro drug-drug interaction (DDI) guidance using the mechanistic static model did not reveal any clinically relevant inhibition on OCTs and MATEs. However, a DDI risk was flagged with EMA static model predictions. Hence, a physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model of fostemsavir/temsavir was developed to further assess the DDI risk potential of OCT and MATEs inhibition by temsavir and predict changes in metformin (a sensitive OCT and MATEs substrate) exposure. No clinically relevant impact on metformin concentrations across a wide range of temsavir concentrations was predicted; therefore, no dose adjustment is recommended for metformin when co-administered with fostemsavir.

Mechanism of action, resistance, interaction, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and safety of fostemsavir.

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has licensed many antiretroviral medications to treat human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1), however, treatment options for people with multi-drug resistant HIV remain limited. Medication resistance, undesirable effects, prior tolerance, and previous interlacement incapacity to deliver new drug classes all lead to the requirement for new medication classes and drug combination therapy. Fostemsavir (FTR) is a new CD-4 attachment inhibitor medicine that was recently authorized by the United States FDA to treat HIV-1. In individuals with multidrug-resistant (MDR) HIV-1, FTR is well tolerated and virologically active. According to recent investigations, drug combination therapy can positively affect MDR-HIV. The mechanism of action, resistance, interaction, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and safety of FTR has been highlighted in this review.

Fostemsavir resistance-associated polymorphisms in HIV-1 subtype C in a large cohort of treatment-naïve and treatment-experienced individuals in Botswana.

IMPORTANCE: Fostemsavir (FTR) is a newly licensed antiretroviral drug that has been shown to have activity against HIV-1. The mechanism of action of FTR is different from all currently available antiretrovirals (ARVs), and as such, it offers hope for HIV-1 suppression in those people with HIV (PWH) who harbor HIV-1 variants with drug resistance mutations to currently used ARVs. Using 6,030 HIV-1 sequences covering the HIV-1 envelope from PWH in Botswana who are antiretroviral therapy (ART) naïve as well as those who are failing ART, we explored the sequences for FTR resistance-associated polymorphisms. We found the prevalence of FTR polymorphisms to be similar in both ART-naïve and ART-experienced individuals with VF in this setting, with no prior FTR exposure. Further studies on the phenotypic impact of these polymorphisms are warranted to guide how to monitor for FTR resistance.

Model-Based Dose Selection of Fostemsavir for Pediatric Populations With Multidrug-Resistant HIV-1 and Relative Bioavailability Assessment in Healthy Adults.

Fostemsavir, a prodrug of the first-in-class HIV-1 attachment inhibitor temsavir, is approved for the treatment of multidrug-resistant HIV-1 in adults; its use in pediatric populations is currently being studied. Population pharmacokinetic modeling across pediatric weight bands was used to guide pediatric fostemsavir dose selection. Dosing simulations demonstrated that twice-daily fostemsavir 600-mg (adult dose) and 400-mg doses met safety and efficacy criteria for 35 kg or greater and 20 or greater to less than 35 kg pediatric weight bands, respectively. Temsavir relative bioavailability of 2 low-dose fostemsavir extended-release formulations (3 × 200 mg; formulations A and B) and reference formulation (600 mg extended release) was assessed in a 2-part, open-label, randomized, crossover study in healthy adults. Part 1 (N = 32) compared single-dose temsavir relative bioavailability, and Part 2 (N = 16) evaluated the impact of fed versus fasted conditions using the selected low-dose formulation. Temsavir geometric mean ratios for the area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity and maximum concentration for formulation B were bioequivalent to the reference formulation. Temsavir maximum concentration for formulation B was similar in fed and fasted states, but area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity geometric mean ratio was increased under fed conditions, consistent with previous results in adults. These analyses demonstrated efficient pediatric dose selection using a model-based approach.

Temsavir Modulates HIV-1 Envelope Conformation by Decreasing Its Proteolytic Cleavage.

HIV-1 envelope glycoproteins (Envs) mediate viral entry and represent a target of choice for small molecule inhibitors. One of them, temsavir (BMS-626529) prevents the interaction of the host cell receptor CD4 with Env by binding the pocket under the ß20-ß21 loop of the Env subunit gp120. Along with its capacity to prevent viral entry, temsavir stabilizes Env in its "closed" conformation. We recently reported that temsavir affects glycosylation, proteolytic processing, and overall conformation of Env. Here, we extend these results to a panel of primary Envs and infectious molecular clones (IMCs), where we observe a heterogeneous impact on Env cleavage and conformation. Our results suggest that the effect of temsavir on Env conformation is associated with its capacity to decrease Env processing. Indeed, we found that the effect of temsavir on Env processing affects the recognition of HIV-1-infected cells by broadly neutralizing antibodies and correlates with their capacity to mediate antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC).

Validation of an LC-MS/MS method for quantitation of fostemsavir in plasma.

BACKGROUND: A novel, sensitive and specific LC-MS/MS technique was developed and validated for the quantification of fostemsavir in human plasma and its pharmacokinetic application in rabbits. METHODS: Chromatographic separation of the fostemsavir and fosamprenavir (internal standard) were achieved on Zorbax C18 (50 mm × 2 mm × 5 µm) column with 0.80 mL/min flow rate and coupled with API6000 triple quadrupole MS in multi reaction monitoring mode by applying mass transitions m/z 584.16/105.03 for fostemsavir and m/z 586.19/57.07 for the internal standard. RESULTS: The calibration curve exhibited linearity in concentration range of 58.5-2340.0 ng/mL for fostemsavir. The LLOQ was 58.5 ng/mL. The validated LC-MS/MS process was effectively applied for the analysis of plasma in healthy rabbits for determinations of Fostemsavir. From the pharmacokinetic data, the mean of Cmax and Tmax were 198.19 ± 5.85 ng/mL and 2.42 ± 0.13, respectively. Plasma concentration reduced with t1/2 of 7.02 ± 0.14. AUC0→Last value obtained was 2374.87 ± 29.75 ng. h/ml, respectively. CONCLUSION: In summary, the developed method has been successfully validated and pharmacokinetic parameters were demonstrated after oral administration of Fostemsavir to healthy rabbits.

Temsavir blocks the immunomodulatory activities of HIV-1 soluble gp120.

While HIV-1-mediated CD4 downregulation protects infected cells from antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC), shed gp120 binds to CD4 on uninfected bystander CD4+ T cells, sensitizing them to ADCC mediated by HIV+ plasma. Soluble gp120-CD4 interaction on multiple immune cells also triggers a cytokine burst. The small molecule temsavir acts as an HIV-1 attachment inhibitor by preventing envelope glycoprotein (Env)-CD4 interaction and alters the overall antigenicity of Env by affecting its processing and glycosylation. Here we show that temsavir also blocks the immunomodulatory activities of shed gp120. Temsavir prevents shed gp120 from interacting with uninfected bystander CD4+ cells, protecting them from ADCC responses and preventing a cytokine burst. Mechanistically, this depends on temsavir's capacity to prevent soluble gp120-CD4 interaction, to reduce gp120 shedding, and to alter gp120 antigenicity. This suggests that the clinical benefits provided by temsavir could extend beyond blocking viral entry.

Investigational drugs for HIV: trends, opportunities and key players.

INTRODUCTION: Since the first antiretroviral drug was described, the field of HIV treatment and prevention has undergone two drug-based revolutions: the first one, enabled by the virtually concomitant discovery of non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase and protease inhibitors, was the inception of combined antiretroviral therapy. The second followed the creation of integrase strand-transfer inhibitors with improved safety, potency, and resistance profiles. Long-acting antiretroviral drugs, including broadly neutralizing antibodies, now offer the opportunity for a third transformational change in HIV management. AREAS COVERED: Our review focused on HIV treatment and prevention with investigational drugs that offer the potential for infrequent dosing, including drugs not yet approved for clinical use. We also discussed approved drugs for which administration modalities or formulations are being optimized. We performed a literature search in published manuscripts, conference communications, and registered clinical trials. EXPERT OPINION: While the field focuses on extending dosing intervals, we identify drug tissue penetration as an understudied opportunity to improve HIV care. We repeat that self-administration remains an essential milestone to reach the full potential of long-acting drugs. Treatments and prevention strategies based on broadly neutralizing antibodies require a deeper understanding of their antiretroviral properties.

Fostemsavir and ethinyl estradiol drug interaction: Clinical recommendations for co-administration.

OBJECTIVES: Fostemsavir, a prodrug of temsavir, is indicated for heavily treatment-experienced adults with multidrug-resistant HIV-1 infection, antiretroviral (ARV) intolerance, or safety considerations. Understanding drug-drug interactions (DDIs) is important in individuals taking fostemsavir with hormonal contraceptives or menopausal or gender-affirming hormonal therapies. METHODS: Effect of temsavir (active moiety) on the pharmacokinetics of ethinyl estradiol (EE) and norethindrone (NET) was evaluated in an open-label, single-sequence, four-cycle, four-treatment study in 26 healthy female participants (study 206279, NCT02480881). Relevant ARV-contraceptive interaction studies and guideline recommendations were reviewed; that information was then applied to other contraceptive methods and hormone-based therapies to predict the impact of fostemsavir co-administration. RESULTS: Temsavir increased EE concentrations by 40% and had no effect on NET concentrations. Fostemsavir co-administration with hormone therapy is not expected to impact hormone treatment efficacy. Fostemsavir did not impact progestin; therefore, progestin-only and non-hormonal contraceptives will not be impacted by fostemsavir. Recommendations for co-administration of fostemsavir and hormonal contraceptives or menopausal or gender-affirming hormone therapies are based upon known and predicted DDIs, ensuring adequate hormonal concentrations to maintain the target effect. CONCLUSIONS: Applying the results of Study 206279 and other relevant ARV-contraceptive studies, we recommend that when co-administering fostemsavir with combined oral contraceptives (COCs) and other oestrogen-based therapies, EE dose should not exceed 30 µg or equivalent, and caution is advised in the case of individuals with risk factors for thromboembolic events. Other oestrogen-based therapies may be co-administered with fostemsavir, with monitoring of oestrogen concentrations and appropriate dose adjustments. No impact of fostemsavir on COC efficacy is expected.

Development and validation of a liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry method for the monitoring of temsavir plasma concentrations in people living with HIV.

A majority of people living with HIV (PLWH) now have access to HIV treatment with high antiviral potency and favorable tolerability profile. However, in some treatment experienced PLWH viral strains resistant to major current classes of antiretrovirals have emerged, usually due to periods with continued virus replication in the presence of failing drug regimens and thus selection pressure. In such context, new treatment options are therefore needed. Fostemsavir (RUKOBIA®) is the prodrug of temsavir, a first-in-class oral attachment inhibitor approved for the treatment of heavily treatment-experienced adults with multidrug-resistant HIV-1 infection. In this case RUKOBIA® is part of a complex regimen of antiretroviral drugs, often in addition to other drugs for chronic co-morbidities (e.g., heart disease, diabetes mellitus, hepatic and renal impairment, etc). In such a multi-drug regimen context, therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of temsavir can be necessary to exclude or adjust for relevant drug-drug interactions. A highly selective assay by liquid chromatography method coupled to tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) was therefore developed for the quantification of temsavir in human plasma. A convenient sample preparation using protein precipitation with acetonitrile followed by supernatant dilution was carried out. Temsavir and fostemsavir were separated in less than 2 min using a multi-step UPLC gradient, thus ensuring adequate quantification of temsavir. The assay for the quantification of temsavir was extensively validated over the large range of clinically relevant concentrations from 1 to 10,000 ng/mL, in accordance with international bioanalytical method guidelines. The method achieves excellent performance in terms of trueness (99.7 - 105.3%), repeatability and intermediate precision (both from 1.6% to 5.8%). This LC-MS/MS method is now part of the routine analyses of the Laboratory of the Service of Clinical Pharmacology of Lausanne (CHUV), Switzerland, as an integrated part of our general TDM Service for antiretrovirals.

Pharmacokinetics, metabolism and excretion of radiolabeled fostemsavir administered with or without ritonavir in healthy male subjects.

The pharmacokinetics, elimination, and metabolism of fostemsavir (FTR), a prodrug of the HIV-1 attachment inhibitor temsavir (TMR), were investigated in healthy volunteers. FTR was administered with and without ritonavir (RTV), a protease inhibitor previously shown to boost TMR exposures. In vitro studies were also used to identify the enzymes responsible for the metabolism of TMR.Total recovery of the administered dose ranged from 78% to 89%. Approximately 44% to 58% of the dose was excreted in urine, 20%-36% in faeces, and 5% in bile, as TMR and metabolites. RTV had no effect on the recovery of radioactivity in any matrix.Compared to FTR alone, pre-treatment of subjects with RTV increased the exposure of TMR by ∼66% and reduced the exposure of plasma total radioactivity by ∼68%.The major route of TMR elimination was through biotransformation. TMR, M28 (N-dealkylation), and M4 (amide hydrolysis) were the major circulating components in plasma. Pre-treatment with RTV increased the amount of TMR present, decreased the amount of circulating M28, and M4 was unchanged.CYP3A4 metabolism accounted for 21% of the dose, forming multiple oxidative metabolites. This pathway was inhibited by coadministration of RTV.

Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Fostemsavir in Heavily Treatment-Experienced People With HIV-1.

PURPOSE: Heavily treatment-experienced (HTE) people with multidrug-resistant HIV-1 have limited treatment options. Treatment with the first-in-class attachment inhibitor fostemsavir in addition to optimized background therapy (OBT) resulted in sustained virologic and immunologic responses in HTE participants throughout 96 weeks in the BRIGHTE trial. In the absence of long-term direct comparative evidence between fostemsavir-based and other antiretroviral regimens, this analysis indirectly compares efficacy and safety across relevant available trials, adjusting for demographic and baseline characteristics. METHODS: A systematic literature review was conducted to identify trials with designs and populations comparable to BRIGHTE. Using matching-adjusted indirect comparison analyses, individual participant data from BRIGHTE were reweighted to create balanced populations across trials, and efficacy and safety outcomes were compared. FINDINGS: Three comparator trials were identified, 2 of which reflected an optimized therapy without fostemsavir (OBT alone): TMB-301 (ibalizumab and OBT), BENCHMRK-1/-2 (OBT alone), and VIKING-3 (OBT alone). Compared with ibalizumab and OBT (N = 40), fostemsavir and OBT (unadjusted, N = 347; adjusted, N = 236) were associated with numerically higher nonsignificant odds of virologic suppression (odds ratio [OR] = 1.44; 95% CI, 0.74-2.80; P = 0.284) and a similar increase in CD4+ cell count of approximately 65 cells/mm3 from baseline through week 24 (mean difference = 7.05 cells/mm3; 95% CI, -60.88 to 74.98 cells/mm3; P = 0.834). Compared with OBT from BENCHMRK-1/-2 (N = 237), fostemsavir and OBT (adjusted, N = 126) were associated with significantly higher odds of virologic suppression (OR = 3.26; 95% CI, 2.08-5.11; P < 0.001) and increased CD4+ cell count (135.78 cells/mm3; 95% CI, 91.93-179.63 cells/mm3; P < 0.001) at week 96. Compared with OBT from VIKING-3 (N = 183), fostemsavir and OBT (adjusted, N = 78) were associated with numerically higher odds of virologic suppression (OR = 1.34; 95% CI, 0.78-2.30; P = 0.297) and a modest CD4+ cell count increase (26.86 cells/mm3; 95% CI, -10.79 to 64.52; P = 0.162) through week 48; however, differences were not significant. All-cause discontinuations and safety comparisons varied across studies. IMPLICATIONS: Although matching-adjusted indirect comparison analyses have limitations, these results support the use of fostemsavir and OBT as an important treatment option in HTE people with multidrug-resistant HIV-1.

Week 96 Genotypic and Phenotypic Results of the Fostemsavir Phase 3 BRIGHTE Study in Heavily Treatment-Experienced Adults Living with Multidrug-Resistant HIV-1.

In the phase 3 BRIGHTE study in heavily treatment-experienced adults with multidrug-resistant HIV-1, fostemsavir plus optimized background therapy (OBT) resulted in sustained rates of virologic suppression through 96 weeks. HIV-1 RNA <40 copies/mL was achieved in 163/272 (60%) Randomized Cohort (RC) participants (with 1 or 2 remaining approved fully active antiretrovirals) and 37/99 (37%) Non-randomized Cohort (NRC) participants (with 0 fully active antiretrovirals). Here we report genotypic and phenotypic analyses of HIV-1 samples from 63/272 (23%) RC participants and 49/99 (49%) NRC participants who met protocol-defined virologic failure (PDVF) criteria through Week 96. The incidence of PDVF was as expected in this difficult-to-treat patient population and, among RC participants, was comparable regardless of the presence of predefined gp120 amino acid substitutions that potentially influence phenotypic susceptibility to temsavir (S375H/I/M/N/T, M426L, M434I, M475I) or baseline temsavir 50% inhibitory concentration fold change (IC50 FC). The incidence of PDVF was lower among participants with higher overall susceptibility score to newly used antiretrovirals (OSS-new), indicating that OSS-new may be a preferred predictor of virologic outcome in heavily treatment-experienced individuals. Predefined gp120 substitutions, most commonly M426L or S375N, were emergent on treatment in 24/50 (48%) RC and 33/44 (75%) NRC participants with PDVF, with related increases in temsavir IC50 FC. In BRIGHTE, PDVF was not consistently associated with treatment-emergent genotypic or phenotypic changes in susceptibility to temsavir or to antiretrovirals in the initial OBT. Further research will be needed to identify which factors are most likely to contribute to virologic failure in this heavily treatment-experienced population (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02362503).