Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39323506

ABSTRACT

We have previously shown that the Myh6 promoter drives Cre expression in a subset of male germ line cells in three independent Myh6-Cre mouse lines, including two transgenic lines and one knock-in allele. In this study, we further compared the tissue-specificity of the two Myh6-Cre transgenic mouse lines, MDS Myh6-Cre and AUTR Myh6-Cre, through examining the expression of tdTomato (tdTom) red fluorescence protein in multiple internal organs, including the heart, brain, liver, lung, pancreas and brown adipose tissue. Our results show that MDS Myh6-Cre mainly activates tdTom reporter in the heart, whereas AUTR Myh6-Cre activates tdTom expression significantly in the heart, and in the cells of liver, pancreas and brain. In the heart, similar to MDS Myh6-Cre, AUTR Myh6-Cre activates tdTom in most cardiomyocytes. In the other organs, AUTR Myh6-Cre not only mosaically activates tdTom in some parenchymal cells, such as hepatocytes in the liver and neurons in the brain, but also turns on tdTom in some interstitial cells of unknown identity.

2.
G3 (Bethesda) ; 12(12)2022 12 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36250791

ABSTRACT

The yellow fever mosquito Aedes aegypti is a major vector of arthropod-borne viruses, including dengue, chikungunya, and Zika viruses. A novel approach to mitigate arboviral infections is to generate mosquitoes refractory to infection by overexpressing antiviral effector molecules. Such an approach requires a mechanism to spread these antiviral effectors through a population, for example, by using CRISPR/Cas9-based gene drive systems. Critical to the design of a single-locus autonomous gene drive is that the selected genomic locus is amenable to both gene drive and appropriate expression of the antiviral effector. In our study, we used reverse engineering to target 2 intergenic genomic loci, which had previously shown to be highly permissive for antiviral effector gene expression, and we further investigated the use of 3 promoters (nanos, ß2-tubulin, or zpg) for Cas9 expression. We then quantified the accrual of insertions or deletions (indels) after single-generation crossings, measured maternal effects, and assessed fitness costs associated with various transgenic lines to model the rate of gene drive fixation. Overall, MGDrivE modeling suggested that when an autonomous gene drive is placed into an intergenic locus, the gene drive system will eventually be blocked by the accrual of gene drive blocking resistance alleles and ultimately be lost in the population. Moreover, while genomic locus and promoter selection were critically important for the initial establishment of the autonomous gene drive, it was the fitness of the gene drive line that most strongly influenced the persistence of the gene drive in the simulated population. As such, we propose that when autonomous CRISPR/Cas9-based gene drive systems are anchored in an intergenic locus, they temporarily result in a strong population replacement effect, but as gene drive-blocking indels accrue, the gene drive becomes exhausted due to the fixation of CRISPR resistance alleles.


Subject(s)
Aedes , Gene Drive Technology , Zika Virus Infection , Zika Virus , Animals , Aedes/genetics , CRISPR-Cas Systems/genetics , Mosquito Vectors/genetics , Zika Virus/genetics , Zika Virus Infection/genetics
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL