The first report of leukocytoclastic vasculitis induced by once-weekly subcutaneous semaglutide.

INTRODUCTION: Leukocytoclastic vasculitis (LCV) is a small vessel vasculitis involving arterioles, capillaries and postcapillary venules. LCV is generally confined to the skin, with extracutaneous manifestations occurring less frequently. LCV has multiple potential etiologies. Indeed, histological LCV can be found in anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitis, immune complex vasculitis, vasculitis associated with systemic diseases (i.e. sarcoidosis, Sjögren's syndrome, rheumatoid arthritis, and systemic lupus erythematosus), or in vasculitis associated with cancer, infections, sepsis and use of certain medications. LCV can also be idiopathic in up to 50% of cases. CASE REPORT: Semaglutide is a glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) receptor agonist used for management of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), obesity and overweight associated with one or more weight-related comorbidities. A case of drug-induced LCV has already been described with the use of once-daily oral semaglutide. Herein, we describe the first case of skin-limited LCV induced by once-weekly subcutaneous semaglutide in a 73-year-old man with T2DM, who experienced the complete resolution of the skin lesions shortly after the discontinuation of semaglutide therapy. CONCLUSION: Future prospective studies, adverse event reporting and post-marketing surveillance will certainly contribute to establishing if LCV represents a less rare than expected side effect of both oral and subcutaneous semaglutide formulations.

Anti-inflammatory effect of semaglutide: updated systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background: The anti-inflammatory effect could be one of the mechanisms by which semaglutide reduces cardiovascular risk in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and/or obesity. Determining the anti-inflammatory effect of semaglutide was the objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis. Methods: This meta-analysis was performed according to the PRISMA guidelines. A literature search was performed to detect randomised clinical trials that have quantified the effect of semaglutide on C-reactive protein (CRP) levels compared to placebo or a control group (other glucose-lowering drugs). The primary outcome was CRP index (final CRP/basal CRP). A random-effects model was used. Results: Thirteen randomised clinical trials were considered eligible (n = 26,131). Overall, semaglutide therapy was associated with lower CRP index values compared to the placebo group (SMD -0.56; 95% CI -0.69 to -0.43, I 2 92%) or the control group (SMD -0.45; 95% CI -0.68 to -0.23, I 2 82%).Such an association was similarly observed when different treatment regimens (subcutaneous vs. oral) or different populations (patients with or without T2DM) were analysed. The sensitivity analysis showed that the results were robust. Conclusion: The present meta-analysis demonstrated that the use of semaglutide was associated with a reduction in inflammation irrespective of the population evaluated or the treatment regimen used. These findings would explain one of the mechanisms by which semaglutide reduces cardiovascular events. Systematic Review Registration: PROSPERO [CRD42024500551].

A cross-sectional study on the prevalence of cardiovascular disease in elderly patients with long-term type 2 diabetes mellitus mainly attended in private clinics in Mexico. The CAPTURE study.

BACKGROUND: To estimate the contemporary prevalence of established cardiovascular disease (CVD) in adults with type 2 diabetes (T2D) in Mexico. METHODS: CAPTURE was a multinational, non-interventional, cross-sectional study across 13 countries from five continents. Standardized demographic and clinical data were collected from adults with T2D attending a single routine healthcare visit in primary or specialized care between December 2018 and September 2019. Data from Mexico are analyzed in this study. RESULTS: Of the 9,823 patients included in the CAPTURE study, 820 (8.3%) participants were from Mexico, mainly attended in private centers (29.3% in 6 specialized diabetes treatment centers and 70.7% in 26 primary care centers). The median age was 63.0 years, 52.6% were women, the duration of diabetes was 11.8 years and the average HbA1c 7.5%. The weighted prevalence [95% CI] of CVD and atherosclerotic CVD was 36.9% [34.1-39.6] and 29.5% [26.7-32.3], respectively. Additionally, the prevalence of coronary heart disease, heart failure, peripheral arterial disease and cerebrovascular disease was 23.1% [20.6-25-7], 8.4% [6.8-10.0], 5.0% [3.5-6.5] and 3.9% [2.6-5.2], respectively. Glucose lowering drugs were used in 88.5% of patients, being metformin the most commonly drug used (79.4%), followed by sulfonylureas (26.3%). SGLT-2 inhibitors and GLP1 receptor agonists were used in 15.5% and 3.9%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In Mexico, nearly four out of ten patients with T2D mainly attended in private centers have CVD, particularly atherosclerotic CVD. Most patients were not taking glucose lowering drugs with proven CV benefit.

Lower prevalence of elevated liver stiffness measurements in people with type 2 diabetes taking sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors or glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Among people with type 2 diabetes (T2D), non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is very common and has an increased risk of clinically significant liver disease. The use of sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2i) inhibitors and glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1a) receptor agonists is endorsed to reduce major cardiovascular events and/or progression of chronic kidney disease. Their prevalence of use in people with T2D and co-existent NAFLD remains unclear. We sought to determine the prevalence of use of these medications at two different time periods, and their association with prevalence of clinically significant liver disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Consecutive people with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) were recruited from diabetes clinics between Jun-2021 and Jun-2022 ('current' cohort). Liver stiffness measurements (LSM) using FibroScan were performed. Medication data were collected prospectively at recruitment and verified with the dispensing pharmacy or general practitioner medical records. Data for a historical cohort with NAFLD and T2D recruited from the same clinics during 2015-2017 ('historical' cohort) were available. Logistic regression was used to evaluate factors associated with LSM <8.0 or ≥8 kPa (clinically significant fibrosis). RESULTS: There were 292 participants, 177 in the historical cohort and 115 in the current cohort. In the current cohort, 57.4% of patients with T2D and NAFLD were taking a GLP-1a and 42.6% were taking a SGLT2i; a 2.6 to 3.4-fold higher prevalence than in 2015-2017. A lower proportion of the current cohort (23.9% compared to 38.4%) had clinically significant fibrosis (LSM ≥8 kPa; p = 0.012). When the cohorts were pooled and differences adjusted for in multivariable logistic regression analysis, patients taking a GLP-1a or a SGLT2i were 2 times more likely to have a lower LSM (<8 kPa) compared to patients not taking these drugs (OR=2.05, 95%CI 1.07-3.94, p = 0.03 and OR 2.07 95%CI 1.04-4.11, p = 0.04, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The observation of a lower LSM in people taking SGLT2i and/or GLP-1a following adjustment for other relevant clinico-demographic variables provides support for clinical trials to assess their efficacy in reducing the progression of NAFLD.

Transitioning from basal-bolus or premix insulin therapy to a combination of basal insulin and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist in people with type 2 diabetes.

AIMS: Two fixed-ratio combinations (FRCs) of basal insulin and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1RA) are available for once-daily use in adults with type 2 diabetes. We aimed to review the clinical evidence for the efficacy and safety of changing treatment from a basal-bolus insulin (BBI) regimen or a premix insulin to these combination treatments (fixed-ratio or loose) and provide expert opinion on the practicalities of making such a change. METHODS: Relevant clinical and trial evidence and general review articles were identified through a literature review of ProQuest (comprising BIOSIS Previews®, Current Contents® Search, Embase® and MEDLINE®) for articles published between 2009 and 2021. RESULTS: We identified nine articles reporting the results of FRCs, and seven articles reporting results of loose combinations of basal insulin and GLP-1RAs, in people who transitioned treatment from BBI or premix regimens. In most trials, combination treatment led to improved or equivalent glycaemic control, and a reduction in body weight or BMI, versus the original regimens. Some trials reported a reduction in total insulin dose. A few trials reported reduced or unchanged hypoglycaemia rates, or increased patient satisfaction, with combination therapy where these endpoints were examined. We provide guidance on transitioning of treatment and the patient types most likely to benefit. CONCLUSIONS: In people not achieving glycaemic control with BBI or premix insulin regimens, an FRC or loose combination of basal insulin and GLP-1RA may improve control, decrease the risk of body weight gain or hypoglycaemia and reduce the complexity of treatment.

Effect of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists on renal function: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

AIMS: The objective of this meta-analysis was to examine the impact of the GLP-1 RA on renal function parameters in randomized controlled trials. METHODS: A systematic search was performed in PubMed-MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Google Scholar databases. Meta-analysis was performed using a random-effects model and sensitivity analysis. RESULTS: Data from 18 randomized controlled trials involving 12 192 subjects, showed that treatment with GLP-1 RA had no effect on serum creatinine levels (weighted mean difference [WMD]: 0.00 mg/mL, 95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.01, 0.01, P = .83, I2 = 0%) and glomerular filtration rate (WMD: 1.01 mL/min/1.73 m2 , 95% CI: -1.61, 3.63, P = .45, I2 = 75%). On the other hand, a significant reduction in urinary albumin excretion (WMD: -18.01 mg/day, 95% CI: -31.20, -4.82, P = .007, I2 = 23%) and albumin-to-creatinine ratio (WMD: -6.74 mg/g, 95% CI: -12.64, -0.85, P = .03, I2 = 68%) was detected after GLP-1 RA therapy. CONCLUSION: Results of our meta-analysis revealed that GLP-1 RA treatment decreases urinary albumin excretion and albumin-to-creatinine ratio but it did not cause significant changes in creatinine levels and glomerular filtration rate.

Impact of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists on adiponectin concentrations: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

AIMS: Previous studies have reported an elevation in adiponectin concentrations using glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RA) therapy; however, this possible pleiotropic effect is still uncertain. Thus, the objective of this meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials was to assess the impact of GLP-1 RA on adiponectin levels. METHODS: This systematic review and meta-analysis included randomized controlled trials investigating the effect of GLP-1 RA on circulating adiponectin concentrations. Studies from PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar databases were included. A random-effects model and a sensitivity analysis using the leave 1-out method were conducted. RESULTS: A meta-analysis of 20 randomized controlled trials involving 1497 individuals demonstrated a significant increase in adiponectin levels after GLP-1 RA administration (weighted mean difference [WMD]: 0.59 µg/mL, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.10, 1.08, P = .02). Particularly, liraglutide had a significant effect on adiponectin (WMD: 0.55 µg/mL, 95% CI: 0.04, 1.06, P = .04), while exenatide did not affect these concentrations (WMD: 0.60 µg/mL, 95% CI: -0.23, 1.42, P = .16). CONCLUSION: GLP-1 RA treatment is associated with an increase in adiponectin levels.

Effects of Incretin - based Therapy on High - sensitivity C - reactive Protein in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta - Analysis

ABSTRACT Background: Recently, studies had shown that incretin-based therapies could reduce the levels of pro-inflammatory markers. The data on the effects of incretin-based therapies on serum high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) in type 2 diabetes (T2DM) were inconsistent. Objective: The objective of the study was to assess the effects of incretin-based therapies on hs-CRP in patients with T2DM by meta-analysis. Methods: We searched PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Collaboration Library, and Web of Science to identify the eligible randomized clinical trials until August 2019. The pooled standard mean differences (SMD) were calculated by random-effects model using STATA 11.0. Results: Twenty-five studies with 28 randomized controlled trials were finally included into the meta-analysis. Meta-analysis revealed a significant reduction in hs-CRP following treatment with incretin-based regimens compared to controls (SMD = −0.452, p < 0.001). Subgroup analysis of different class of incretin-based drugs showed that therapy with both dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitors (DPP-4Is, SMD = −0.338, p = 0.026) and glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs, SMD = −0.544, p = 0.003) caused significant reductions in hs-CRP. Besides, there was a significant reduction in hs-CRP with an intervention duration more than 24 weeks (SMD = −0.465, p = 0.001), while no significant difference with <24 weeks. Meta-regression analyses showed that better glycemic control and more body mass index (BMI) decline were associated with hs-CRP reduction after incretin-based therapies. Conclusions: This meta-analysis suggests that incretin-based therapies, both GLP-1 RAs and DPP-4Is, can cause a significant reduction in hs-CRP in patients with T2DM, which is related to long intervention duration, better glycemic control, and more BMI decline.

Novel antidiabetic drugs and risk of cardiovascular events in patients without baseline metformin use: a meta-analysis.

AIMS: To evaluate the effect of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT-2) inhibitors and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) on major cardiovascular events (MACE) in metformin-naïve patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D). METHODS AND RESULTS: A meta-analysis was performed of randomized controlled clinical trials of GLP-1RAs and SGLT-2 inhibitors on T2D populations, after searching the PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Controlled Trials databases. The primary endpoint was MACE. The secondary endpoint, explored in the subgroup of SGLT-2 inhibitors studies, was cardiovascular death or hospitalization for heart failure. A random-effects meta-analysis model was applied. Six eligible trials (three studies of SGLT-2 inhibitors and three trials of GLP-1RAs), including 13 049 patients, were identified and considered eligible for the analyses. The new antidiabetic drugs were associated with a significant reduction in MACE [odds ratio (OR): 0.80, 95% confidence interval: 0.70-0.93; I2: 53%]. The subgroup analysis showed the following findings: GLP-1RAs group, OR: 0.77 (95% confidence interval 0.67-0.88); SGLT-2 inhibitors, OR: 0.85 (95% confidence interval 0.63-1.15). SGLT-2 inhibitors were associated with a significant reduction in hospitalization for heart failure or cardiovascular mortality incidence (OR: 0.67, 95% confidence interval: 0.47-0.95; I2: 78%). CONCLUSION: In this meta-analysis, new antidiabetic drugs reduced the incidence of MACE in metformin-naïve T2D patients. The beneficial effect was especially observed in the GLP-1RAs subgroup. The use of SGLT-2 inhibitors was associated with a reduction in cardiovascular death or hospitalization for heart failure. These results support the fact that metformin would not be indispensable to obtain positive cardiovascular effects when new antidiabetic drugs are administered.

Do GLP-1 Receptor Agonists Increase the Risk of Breast Cancer? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

CONTEXT: Risk of cancer is a major concern in the development of drugs for the treatment of obesity and diabetes. In randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of the Liraglutide Clinical Development Program, subjects treated with a glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1RA) had a higher absolute number of breast cancer events. OBJECTIVE: To assess whether patients treated with GLP-1RAs had a higher risk of breast neoplasms. DATA SOURCES: We searched MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and CENTRAL from July 31, 2019 to February 8, 2020. STUDY SELECTION: Reviewers assessed abstracts and full-text articles for RCTs of GLP-1RAs in adults with excessive weight and/or diabetes and a minimum follow-up of 24 weeks. DATA EXTRACTION: Researchers extracted study-level data and assessed within-study risk of bias with the RoB 2.0 tool and quality of evidence with Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE). DATA SYNTHESIS: We included 52 trials, of which 50 reported breast cancer events and 11 reported benign breast neoplasms. Overall methodological quality was high. Among 48 267 subjects treated with GLP-1RAs, 130 developed breast cancer compared with 107 of 40 755 controls (relative risk [RR], 0.98; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.76-1.26). Subset analyses according to follow-up, participant/investigator blinding, and type of GLP-1RA did not reveal any differences. The risk of benign breast neoplasms also did not differ between groups (RR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.48-2.01). Trial sequential analysis provided evidence that the sample size was sufficient to avoid missing alternative results. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with GLP-1RAs for obesity and diabetes does not increase the risk of breast neoplasms.

Insulin secretion decline in Walker-256 tumor-bearing rats is early, follows the course of cachexia, and is not improved by lixisenatide.

Lixisenatide, a glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist, is used to stimulate insulin secretion in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. However, its effect on insulin secretion in cancer patients, particularly during the cachexia course, has not yet been evaluated. The purpose of this study was to investigate the lixisenatide effect on INS secretion decline during the cachexia course (2, 6, and 12 days of tumor) in pancreatic islets isolated from Walker-256 tumor-bearing rats. Pancreatic islets of healthy and tumor-bearing rats were incubated in the presence or absence of lixisenatide (10 nM). Tumor-bearing rats showed reduction of body weight and fat and muscle mass, characterizing the development of cachexia, as well as reduction of insulinemia and INS secretion stimulated by glucose (5.6, 8.3, 11.1, 16.7, and 20 mM) on days 2, 6, and/or 12 of tumor. Lixisenatide increased the 16.7 mM glucose-stimulated insulin secretion, but not by 5.6 mM glucose, in the islets of healthy rats, without changing the insulin intracellular content. However, lixisenatide did not prevent the decreased 16.7 mM glucose-stimulated insulin secretion in the pancreatic islets of rats with 2, 6, and 12 days of tumor and neither the decreased insulin intracellular content of rats with 12 days of tumor. In consistency, in vivo treatment with lixisenatide (50 µg kg-1, SC, once daily, for 6 days) visually increased insulinemia of healthy fasted rats, but did not prevent hypoinsulinemia of tumor-bearing rats. In conclusion, Walker-256 tumor-bearing rats showed early decline (2 days of tumor) of insulin secretion, which followed the cachexia course (6 and 12 days of tumor) and was not improved by lixisenatide, evidencing that this insulin secretagogue, used to treat type 2 diabetes, does not have beneficial effect in cancer bearing-rats.

Making a case for the combined use of SGLT2 inhibitors and GLP1 receptor agonists for cardiorenal protection / Argumentando a favor do uso combinado de inibidores de SGLT2 e agonistas do receptor GLP1 para proteção cardiorrenal

ABSTRACT Sodium glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RA) were initially approved to improve glycemic control in the treatment of type 2 diabetes. Clinical trials have also demonstrated beneficial effects with regards to cardiovascular and renal parameters. Beyond improving glycemic control, these therapies promote weight loss and lower blood pressure when used individually, and in an additive manner when used together. Accordingly, taking advantage of complementary mechanisms of action with the combined use of these two classes of agents to further improve cardiorenal outcomes is conceptually appealing, but has yet to be explored in detail in clinical trials. In this review, we discuss proposed mechanisms for renal protection, clinical benefits, and adverse events associated with the individual and combined use of SGLT2 inhibitors and GLP-1RA. The management of type 2 diabetes has significantly changed over the last few years, moving away from solely glycemic control towards the concurrent management of associated comorbidities in a patient population at significant risk of cardiovascular disease and progression of chronic kidney disease. It is from this perspective that we seek to outline the rationale for the sequential and/or combined use of SGLT2 inhibitors and GLP-1RA in patients with type 2 diabetes.

RESUMO Inibidores do cotransporter-2 de glicose sódica (SGLT2) e agonistas do receptor peptídeo-1 do tipo glucagon (GLP-1RA) foram inicialmente aprovados para melhorar o controle glicêmico no tratamento da diabetes tipo 2. Os ensaios clínicos também demonstraram efeitos benéficos em relação aos parâmetros cardiovasculares e renais. Além de melhorar o controle glicêmico, essas terapias promovem perda de peso e redução da pressão arterial quando usadas individualmente, e de forma aditiva quando usadas em conjunto. Consequentemente, tirar proveito de mecanismos de ação complementares com o uso combinado dessas duas classes de agentes para melhorar ainda mais os resultados cardiorrenais é conceitualmente atraente, mas ainda precisa ser explorado em detalhes em ensaios clínicos. Nesta revisão, discutimos os mecanismos propostos para proteção renal, benefícios clínicos e eventos adversos associados ao uso individual e combinado de inibidores de SGLT2 e GLP-1RA. O tratamento do diabetes tipo 2 mudou significativamente nos últimos anos, passando do controle exclusivamente glicêmico para o tratamento simultâneo de comorbidades associadas em uma população de pacientes com risco significativo de doença cardiovascular e progressão da doença renal crônica. É nessa perspectiva que procuramos delinear a justificativa para o uso sequencial e/ou combinado de inibidores de SGLT2 e GLP-1RA em pacientes com diabetes tipo 2.

Cardiovascular outcomes, heart failure and mortality in type 2 diabetic patients treated with glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs): A systematic review and meta-analysis of observational cohort studies.

BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular outcomes trials (CVOTs) have assessed the effects of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) on major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and mortality in high cardiovascular (CV) risk populations. Observational research can provide complementary evidence about these effects in unselected populations. AIM: To systematically review retrospective observational cohort studies conducted in electronic healthcare databases (EHDs) assessing GLP-1 RAs´ effects on MACE and/or hospitalisation for heart failure (HHF) and/or all-cause mortality in Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients. METHODS: We systematically searched studies meeting inclusion criteria, compared design, methods and population characteristics, assessed risk for bias and did a meta-analysis (MA) using a random-effects model to calculate overall hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CI (confidence intervals). RESULTS: Sixteen studies included 285,436 T2DM patients exposed to GLP-1 RAs (exenatide bid, liraglutide, lixisenatide, long-acting exenatide), n ranged from 219 to 160,803 patients. Comparators included: no exposure, other antidiabetic medications (OADs), combined OADs, canagliflozin or multiple comparators. Ten studies estimated all-cause mortality, hazard ratios (HRs) ranged from 0.17 (95% CI 0.02-1.22) to 1.29 (95% CI 0.54-3.13). Thirteen studies assessed cardiovascular events and/or MACE; HRs ranged from 0.27 (95% CI 0.14-0.53) to 1.11 (95% CI 0.99-1.24). Eight studies assessed HHF, HRs ranged from 0.12 (95% CI 0.02-0.66) to 1.64 (95% CI 1.28-2.13). Excluding two studies because of temporal bias, we obtained pooled estimates for all-cause mortality: HR 0.63 (0.44-0.89), CV outcomes HR 0.84 (0.75-0.94) and HHF; HR 0.94 (0.78-1.14), (high between-study variability: I2  = 83.35%; I2  = 70.3%; and I2  = 90.1%, respectively). CONCLUSION: Pooled results of EHDs' studies assessing GLP-1 RAs effects favoured GLP-1 RAs for all-cause mortality and MACE while were neutral for HHF. Results should be interpreted cautiously because of studies' substantial heterogeneity and limitations of observational research.

[Cardiovascular effects of new non-insulinic anti-diabetes drugs]. / Efectos cardiovasculares de los nuevos fármacos no insulínicos en diabetes.

Diabetes mellitus is currently a serious public health problem worldwide, that increases the risk of presenting microvascular and macrovascular complications. Although achieving the recommended blood glucose goals reduces the risk of microvascular complications, the effect of the drugs used to treat hyperglycemia on macrovascular complications and cardiovascular death is a cause for concern. In this context, the regulatory agencies have modified the regulations for the approval of new drugs in diabetes, by adding the need to demonstrate that they are capable of lowering blood glucose levels together with a solid assessment of cardiovascular safety. The objective of this study is to review the cardiovascular effects of the new families of non-insulin drugs, with special emphasis on their effect on the risk of major cardiovascular events. In recent years, it has finally been confirmed that some of the drugs used to treat diabetes are not only safe from a cardiovascular point of view, but have even shown capacity to reduce the risk of cardiovascular disease in type 2 diabetes mellitus. The evidence obtained determined the updating of some current therapeutic guidelines when cardiovascular risk should be considered a fundamental variable at the time of therapeutic choice in patients with diabetes.

Efectos cardiovasculares de los nuevos fármacos no insulínicos en diabetes / Cardiovascular effects of new non-insulinic anti-diabetes drugs]

La diabetes mellitus constituye actualmente un grave problema de salud pública a nivel mundial, que incrementa el riesgo de presentar complicaciones tanto microvasculares como macrovasculares. Aunque lograr los objetivos de glucemia recomendados reduce el riesgo de complicaciones microvasculares, el efecto de los fármacos para tratar la hiperglucemia sobre las complicaciones macrovasculares y la muerte cardiovascular es motivo de preocupación. En este contexto, las agencias regulatorias han modificado la normativa para la aprobación de nuevos fármacos en diabetes, de forma que establecen la necesidad de demostrar que son capaces de disminuir la glucemia junto con una evaluación sólida de la seguridad cardiovascular. El objetivo de este trabajo es revisar los efectos cardiovasculares de las nuevas familias de fármacos no insulínicos, en especial en su efecto sobre el riesgo de eventos cardiovasculares mayores. En los últimos años, finalmente, se ha confirmado que algunos fármacos para tratar la diabetes no solo son seguros desde el punto de vista cardiovascular, sino que incluso han mostrado capacidad para reducir el riesgo de enfermedad cardiovascular en la diabetes mellitus tipo 2. La evidencia obtenida ha determinado la actualización de algunas guías terapéuticas vigentes cuando el riesgo cardiovascular debería considerarse una variable fundamental al momento de la elección terapéutica en pacientes con diabetes.

Diabetes mellitus is currently a serious public health problem worldwide, that increases the risk of presenting microvascular and macrovascular complications. Although achieving the recommended blood glucose goals reduces the risk of microvascular complications, the effect of the drugs used to treat hyperglycemia on macrovascular complications and cardiovascular death is a cause for concern. In this context, the regulatory agencies have modified the regulations for the approval of new drugs in diabetes, by adding the need to demonstrate that they are capable of lowering blood glucose levels together with a solid assessment of cardiovascular safety. The objective of this study is to review the cardiovascular effects of the new families of non-insulin drugs, with special emphasis on their effect on the risk of major cardiovascular events. In recent years, it has finally been confirmed that some of the drugs used to treat diabetes are not only safe from a cardiovascular point of view, but have even shown capacity to reduce the risk of cardiovascular disease in type 2 diabetes mellitus. The evidence obtained determined the updating of some current therapeutic guidelines when cardiovascular risk should be considered a fundamental variable at the time of therapeutic choice in patients with diabetes.

Combination of basal insulin and GLP-1 receptor agonist: is this the end of basal insulin alone in the treatment of type 2 diabetes?

Glycemic control has been considered a major therapeutic goal within the scope of diabetes management, as supported by robust observational and experimental evidence. However, the coexistence of micro and macrovascular disease is associated with the highest cardiovascular risks which highlights the importance that pharmacological treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus provides not only glycemic control, but also cardiovascular safety. Basal insulin is a highly effective treatment in reducing fasting blood glucose, but it is associated with considerable risk of hypoglycemia and weight gain. Glucagon like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) are also effective in terms of glycemic control and associated with weight loss and low risk of hypoglycemia. The potential benefits of combining GLP-1RAs with basal insulin are contemplated in the current position statement of several different position statement and guidelines. This article reviews the efficacy and safety of different strategies to initiate and intensify basal insulin, with focus on new fixed ratio combinations of basal insulin with GLP-1 RAs available for use in a single injection pen (insulin degludec/liraglutide and insulin glargine/lixisenatide).

A freeze-dried kit formulation for the preparation of Lys(27)(99mTc-EDDA/HYNIC)-Exendin(9-39)/99mTc-EDDA/HYNIC-Tyr3-Octreotide to detect benign and malignant insulinomas.

About 90% of insulinomas are benign and 5%-15% are malignant. Benign insulinomas express the glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor (GLP-1R) and low levels of somatostatin receptors (SSTR), while malignant insulinomas over-express SSTR or GLP-1R in low levels. A kit for the preparation of Lys(27)((99m)Tc-EDDA/HYNIC)-Exendin(9-39)/(99m)Tc-EDDA/HYNIC-Tyr(3)Octreotide was formulated to detect 100% of insulinomas. The formulation showed radiochemical purity of 97±1%, high stability in human serum, and GLP-1R and SSTR affinity. The biodistribution and imaging studies demonstrated properties suitable for its use as a target-specific agent for the simultaneous molecular imaging of GRP-1R- and/or SSTR-positive tumors.