Hedgehog Pathway and Programmed Cell Death Protein-1 Inhibitors for Advanced Basal Cell Carcinoma.

Introduction: Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) is treated with local surgery or noninvasive treatment modalities. If a BCC remains untreated, it can develop into a locally advanced BCC or a metastatic BCC. Case Presentation: Here we report in detail the management of three complex advanced BCC (aBCC) after treatment failure with vismodegib. On all tumors, next generation DNA sequencing in the Center for Personalized Cancer Treatment-02 (CPCT-02) study was performed; subsequently, patients were included in the Drug Rediscovery Protocol (DRUP) trial, in which treatment was started with commercially available targeted anticancer drugs based on the molecular tumor profile. All patients showed partial response or stable disease following treatment with second line PD-1 inhibitors with an average duration of response of 12.3 months. Discussion/Conclusion: Immunotherapy can be a treatment option for aBCC resistant to hedgehog pathway inhibitor treatment. However, despite the high tumor mutational burden of aBCCs, immunotherapy does not always lead to a long response. Rechallenge or combining treatment of hedgehog inhibitors and PD-1 inhibitors by parallel or alternating cycles may be a strategy to lengthen the treatment response.

Vismodegib in Gorlin-Goltz syndrome: A systematic review.

Treatment with Hedgehog Inhibitors in Gorlin-Goltz syndrome (GGS) yields favourable objective clinical responses, yet secondary resistance and class-related toxicity restrict treatment duration. This study aims to review current data on GGS patients undergoing vismodegib therapy, focusing on treatment duration, clinical outcomes and schedule modifications. A systematic search of the PubMed database was conducted for English articles from 1993 to 2023, identifying 31 papers suitable for inclusion. A total of 351 patients, with a mean age of 52 years, were analysed. The average treatment duration was 9.3 months for patients who discontinued treatment, and 25.1 months for those who continued vismodegib at the time this study was published. Vismodegib achieved a complete response rate of 44%. Treatment interruption predominantly occurred due to side effects (69.1%) and secondary resistance (9.1%). The use of alternative regimens, although not compromising efficacy, may enhance treatment compliance. Further investigations are warranted to ascertain the optimal treatment regimen and timeline for GGS patients. Schedule modifications offer promise in ameliorating side effects and facilitating long-term treatment.

Exploring vismodegib: A non-surgical breakthrough in the management of advanced periocular basal cell carcinoma.

The management of periocular basal cell carcinoma (BCC) is challenging due to its proximity to the eyeball. Vismodegib, a Hedgehog pathway inhibitor, has emerged as a therapeutic option for locally advanced and metastatic BCC. To critically appraise the relevant evidence, we conducted a systematic review of observational and experimental studies assessing the efficacy and safety of vismodegib for periocular BCC. Thirty-seven trials, including 435 patients, were eligible. No randomized trials were retrieved. Complete and overall clinical response rates were 20-88 % and 68-100 %, respectively. Disease progression was observed at a maximum rate of 14 %. Recurrence rates varied between 0 % and 31 %. The most common side effects were muscle cramps, dysgeusia, weight loss and alopecia. Treatment with vismodegib improved health-related quality of life. In conclusion, vismodegib represents an important novel treatment for advanced periocular BCC, with good response rates and acceptable tolerability profile. Nevertheless, its full potential needs clarification through randomized controlled trials.

Complete pathologic clearance with vismodegib in advanced basal cell carcinoma of the scalp with cranial invasion.

The management of advanced basal cell carcinoma (BCC) can be challenging and often involves a multi-disciplinary approach with dermatologists, plastic surgeons, and oncologists. Standard therapy for advanced BCCs has historically involved prompt excision and radiation; however, in recent years, management strategies utilizing hedgehog pathway inhibitors as neoadjuvant therapy have gained popularity. While controversy regarding management recommendations still exists, we present a case of advanced BCC with cranial involvement in an immunocompromised patient where the use of neoadjuvant vismodegib led to a favorable outcome and, surprisingly, complete the pathologic clearance of the tumor.

Predictive factors of response to vismodegib: a French study of 61 patients with multiple or locally advanced basal cell carcinoma

Background: Vismodegib is indicated for the treatment of advanced or metastatic basal cell carcinoma (BCC). The predictive factors of response to vismodegib have so far been poorly described. Objectives: The primary objective was to determine the profile of patients responding to vismodegib and the duration of response. Secondary objectives were to assess whether there is a correlation between the duration of treatment and the risk of relapse, and to define factors associated with relapse. Materials & Methods: We included 61 patients with locally advanced BCC (laBCC) or multiple BCC, treated with vismodegib (150 mg per day), from July 2011 to November 2015, in the Oncodermatology Department of Nantes University Hospital in France. Tumour response was assessed using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours version 1.1. Results: Thirty-nine patients had advanced BCC (64%) and 22 patients multiple BCC (36%), including 10 patients with Gorlin syndrome. No factor predicted response to vismodegib. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 69.5 months for the total population. In multivariate analysis, multiple BCC was the only factor associated with an increased risk of relapse (HR: 13.80 [CI95%, 1.93-98.64, p < 0.01]). Treatment duration decreased the risk of relapse (HR 0.95 [CI95%, 0.90-0.99, p = 0.0467]). Among the 20 patients who experienced relapse during follow-up, 15 (75%) were re-treated with vismodegib, with a response rate of 66%. Conclusion: Although we were unable to establish predictive factors for the response to vismodegib, we demonstrate for the first time that increased treatment duration correlates with a decreased risk of relapse.

Vismodegib and Sonidegib in Locally Advanced and Metastatic Basal Cell Carcinoma: Update on Hedgehog Pathway Inhibitors. / Vismodegib y sonidegib en el carcinoma de células basales localmente avanzado y metastásico: actualización acerca de los inhibidores de la vía de Hedgehog.

As one of the most common malignancies, basal cell carcinoma (BCC) has evolved as a global burden with incidence annually rising, especially in the older population. Even though the condition is mostly localized, the nature of the disease is destructive and can evolve as either locally advanced BCC (laBCC) or even more rarely as metastatic BCC (mBCC). There are well-established conventional treatment options for these cases, including surgeries and radiotherapy. However, not all cases are eligible for conventional treatments. Recently, biologic treatment has gained a lot of attention and research. This has led to the development of targeted treatment involving the hedgehog pathway inhibitor (HPI), a key pathogenesis in laBCC and mBCC. There are currently two approved HPIs, vismodegib and sonidegib to treat inoperable laBCC and mBCC. This review seeks to explore the pathophysiology of hedgehog pathway behind the development of BCC, and the current update of the efficacy as well as pharmacokinetics properties of HPIs that led to the ideal treatment for laBCC or mBCC, either as monotherapy or in combination with other conventional therapies.

Vismodegib y sonidegib en el carcinoma de células basales localmente avanzado y metastásico: actualización acerca de los inhibidores de la vía de Hedgehog / Vismodegib and Sonidegib in Locally Advanced and Metastatic Basal Cell Carcinoma: Update on Hedgehog Pathway Inhibitors

El carcinoma de células basales (CBC) es una de las neoplasias malignas más frecuentes, por lo que se ha convertido en una importante carga asistencial. Su incidencia se incrementa anualmente, especialmente en la población con mayor edad. A pesar de que generalmente está bien localizado, el CBC tiene la capacidad de destruir tejidos y evolucionar a un CBC localmente avanzado (CBCla) o incluso, aunque de forma más rara, a un CBC metastásico (CBCm). Las opciones terapéuticas convencionales en estos casos están bien establecidas, entre las cuales se incluyen la cirugía y la radioterapia. Sin embargo, no todos los casos son elegibles para realizar un tratamiento de tipo convencional. Recientemente, los tratamientos biológicos vienen ganando una mayor atención y son objeto de diversos estudios de investigación. De este modo se ha desarrollado una terapia dirigida utilizando los inhibidores de la vía de Hedgehog (IVH), teniendo en cuenta que se trata de una vía patogénica clave tanto en el CBCla como en el CBCm. En la actualidad, para poder tratar el CBCla y el CBCm no operables existen dos IVH aprobados: el vismodegib y el sonidegib. Esta revisión busca explorar la fisiopatología de la vía del Hedgehog responsable del desarrollo del CBC y hacer una actualización en cuanto a la eficacia, así como de las propiedades farmacocinéticas de los IVH, características que los convirtieron en la opción terapéutica ideal en el CBCla o en el CBCm, ya sea en forma de monoterapia o en combinación con alguno de los tratamientos convencionales (AU)

As one of the most common malignancies, basal cell carcinoma (BCC) has evolved as a global burden with incidence annually rising, especially in the older population. Even though the condition is mostly localized, the nature of the disease is destructive and can evolve as either locally advanced BCC (laBCC) or even more rarely as metastatic BCC (mBCC). There are well-established conventional treatment options for these cases, including surgeries and radiotherapy. However, not all cases are eligible for conventional treatments. Recently, biologic treatment has gained a lot of attention and research. This has led to the development of targeted treatment involving the hedgehog pathway inhibitor (HPI), a key pathogenesis in laBCC and mBCC. There are currently two approved HPIs, vismodegib and sonidegib to treat inoperable laBCC and mBCC. This review seeks to explore the pathophysiology of hedgehog pathway behind the development of BCC, and the current update of the efficacy as well as pharmacokinetics properties of HPIs that led to the ideal treatment for laBCC or mBCC, either as monotherapy or in combination with other conventional therapies (AU)