Pharmacokinetics and safety of GST-HG171, a novel 3CL protease inhibitor, in Chinese subjects with impaired and normal liver function.

GST-HG171 is a potent, broad-spectrum, orally bioavailable small-molecule 3C-like (3CL) protease inhibitor that was recently approved for treating mild to moderate coronavirus disease 2019 patients in China. Since cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes, primarily CYP3A, are the main metabolic enzymes of GST-HG171, hepatic impairment may affect its pharmacokinetic (PK) profile. Aiming to guide clinical dosing for patients with hepatic impairment, this study, using a non-randomized, open-label, single-dose design, assessed the impact of hepatic impairment on the PK, safety, and tolerability of GST-HG171. Patients with mild and moderate hepatic impairment along with healthy subjects were enrolled (n = 8 each), receiving a single oral dose of 150 mg GST-HG171, with concurrent administration of 100 mg ritonavir to sustain CYP3A inhibition before and after GST-HG171 administration (-12, 0, 12, and 24 hours). Compared to subjects with normal hepatic function, the geometric least-squares mean ratios (90% confidence intervals) for GST-HG171's maximum plasma concentration (Cmax), area under the concentration-time curve up to the last quantifiable time (AUC0-t), and area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 extrapolated to infinity (AUC0-∞) in subjects with mild hepatic impairment were 1.14 (0.99, 1.31), 1.07 (0.88, 1.30), and 1.07 (0.88, 1.29), respectively. For moderate hepatic impairment, the ratios were 0.87 (0.70, 1.07), 0.82 (0.61, 1.10), and 0.82 (0.61, 1.10), respectively. Hepatic impairment did not significantly alter GST-HG171's peak time (Tmax) and elimination half-life (T1/2). GST-HG171 exhibited good safety and tolerability in the study. Taken together, mild to moderate hepatic impairment minimally impacted GST-HG171 exposure, suggesting no need to adjust GST-HG171 dosage for patients with mild to moderate hepatic impairment in the clinic.Clinical TrialsRegistered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT06106113).

Phase 1 pharmacokinetic and safety study of soticlestat in participants with mild or moderate hepatic impairment or normal hepatic function.

This phase 1, open-label, three-arm study (NCT05098054) compared the pharmacokinetics and safety of soticlestat (TAK-935) in participants with hepatic impairment. Participants aged ≥18 to <75 years had moderate (Child-Pugh B) or mild (Child-Pugh A) hepatic impairment or normal hepatic function (matched to hepatic-impaired participants by sex, age, and body mass index). Soticlestat was administered as a single oral 300 mg dose. Pharmacokinetic parameters of soticlestat and its metabolites TAK-935-G (M3) and M-I were assessed and compared by group. The incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and other safety parameters were also monitored. The pharmacokinetic analyses comprised 35 participants. Participants with moderate hepatic impairment had lower proportions of bound and higher proportions of unbound soticlestat than participants with mild hepatic impairment and normal hepatic function. Total plasma soticlestat pharmacokinetic parameters (maximum observed concentration [Cmax], area under the concentration-time curve from time 0 to time of last quantifiable concentration [AUClast], and AUC from time 0 to infinity [AUC∞]) were approximately 115%, 216%, and 199% higher with moderate and approximately 45%, 35%, and 30% higher with mild hepatic impairment, respectively, than healthy matched participants. Moderate hepatic impairment decreased the liver's ability to metabolize soticlestat to M-I; glucuronidation to M3 was also affected. Mild hepatic impairment resulted in a lower total plasma M-I exposure, but glucuronidation was unaffected. TEAEs were similar across study arms, mild, and no new safety findings were observed. A soticlestat dose reduction is required for individuals with moderate but not mild hepatic impairment.

Effect of Mild or Moderate Hepatic Impairment on the Pharmacokinetics of Avacopan, a Small-Molecule Complement C5a Receptor Antagonist, for the Treatment of Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic Autoantibody-Associated Vasculitis.

Avacopan is currently approved in several regions of the world as an oral treatment in combination with standard therapy, including glucocorticoids, for adult patients with severe active antineutrophil cytoplasmic autoantibody-associated vasculitis. In vitro and clinical studies have established that avacopan is primarily eliminated through cytochrome P450 3A4 metabolism. This Phase 1, open-label, single-dose study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT06004934) was conducted to evaluate the effect of mild (n = 8) or moderate (n = 8) hepatic impairment compared with normal hepatic function (n = 8) on the pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability of a single oral dose of 30 mg of avacopan in patients without active antineutrophil cytoplasmic autoantibody-associated vasculitis. Relative to participants with normal hepatic function, in participants with mild or moderate hepatic impairment, the avacopan area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 to infinity geometric mean ratios (90% confidence intervals) were 1.3 (0.9-2.0) and 1.1 (0.6-2.0), respectively, and the avacopan maximum plasma concentration geometric mean ratios (90% CIs) were 1.0 (0.8-1.3) and 0.8 (0.6-1.1), respectively. The geometric mean ratios of metabolite M1 also revealed no pharmacokinetically relevant increase in the peak exposure of M1 in participants with mild or moderate hepatic impairment. Thus, no avacopan dosage adjustment is necessary for patients with mild or moderate hepatic impairment.

Effect of Hepatic Impairment on Trofinetide Exposures Using an In Silico Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Model.

INTRODUCTION: Trofinetide is the first drug to be approved for the treatment of Rett syndrome. Hepatic impairment is not expected to affect the pharmacokinetic (PK) profile of trofinetide because of predominant renal excretion. This study was conducted to help understand the potential impact of any hepatic impairment on trofinetide PK. METHODS: This study used physiologically based PK modeling to estimate trofinetide exposure (maximum drug concentration and area under the concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity) in virtual patients with mild, moderate, and severe hepatic impairment (per Child-Pugh classification) compared with virtual healthy subjects following a 12 g oral trofinetide dose. RESULTS: In individual deterministic simulations for matched individuals and stochastic simulations at the population level (100 virtual individuals simulated per population), as anticipated, predicted plasma exposures were similar for healthy subjects and for patients with mild, moderate, and severe hepatic impairment. However, predicted blood concentration exposures slightly increased with increasing severity of hepatic impairment because of change in hematocrit levels. CONCLUSION: This study indicates that hepatic impairment is not expected to have a clinically relevant effect on exposure to trofinetide.

Trofinetide is the first approved treatment for Rett syndrome, a rare genetic condition that affects brain development. When a person takes trofinetide, most is removed from the body via the urine in its unchanged form (no chemical alteration). Regulatory requirements mean researchers must confirm the safety of any pharmaceutical drug and evaluate whether changes in liver function lead to harmful levels of drug exposure. Researchers used a computer model to predict how much trofinetide would be present in the blood and plasma (the liquid portion of blood) over time in virtual healthy subjects and virtual patients with varying degrees of liver disease (mild, moderate, or severe). Computer simulations showed that predicted trofinetide levels in plasma were similar in virtual healthy subjects and each virtual patient group with liver disease. Predicted levels of trofinetide in blood were slightly elevated with increasing severity of liver disease. This is because people with liver disease have fewer red blood cells, so the cell portion of blood becomes smaller relative to the liquid portion (plasma), which leads to higher trofinetide concentrations in whole blood (trofinetide minimally enters the red blood cell). The small increase in trofinetide levels in blood and the absence of any change in trofinetide levels in plasma means that people with Rett syndrome and liver disease are unlikely to be exposed to harmful levels of trofinetide after a 12 g oral dose.

Expanding Role of Endogenous Biomarkers for Assessment of Transporter Activity in Drug Development: Current Applications and Future Horizon.

The evaluation of transporter-mediated drug-drug interactions (DDIs) during drug development and post-approval contributes to benefit-risk assessment and helps formulate clinical management strategies. The use of endogenous biomarkers, which are substrates of clinically relevant uptake and efflux transporters, to assess the transporter inhibitory potential of a drug has received widespread attention. Endogenous biomarkers, such as coproporphyrin (CP) I and III, have increased mechanistic understanding of complex DDIs. Other endogenous biomarkers are under evaluation, including, but not limited to, sulfated bile acids and 4-pyridoxic acid (PDA). The role of endogenous biomarkers has expanded beyond facilitating assessment of transporter-mediated DDIs and they have also been used to understand alterations in transporter activity in the setting of organ dysfunction and various disease states. We envision that endogenous biomarker-informed approaches will not only help to formulate a prudent and informed DDI assessment strategy but also facilitate quantitative predictions of changes in drug exposures in specific populations.

Doses Evaluated in Clinical Pharmacology Studies Investigating the Effect of Intrinsic and Extrinsic Factors on PK and Safety: Case Examples from Approved Drug Development Programs.

Dose selection for investigations of intrinsic and extrinsic factors of pharmacokinetic variability as well as safety is a challenging question in the early clinical stage of drug development. The dose of an investigational product is chosen considering the compound information available to date, feasibility of the assessments, regulatory requirements, and the intent to maximize information for later regulatory submission. This review selected 37 programs as case examples of recently approved drugs to explore the doses selected with focus on studies of drug interaction, renal and hepatic impairment, food effect and concentration-QTc assessment.The review found that regulatory agencies may consider alternative approaches if justified and safe as illustrated in these examples. It is thus recommendable to use the first in human trial as an opportunity to assess QT-prolongation and drug interactions using probes or endogenous markers while maximizing the DDI potential, increasing sensitivity and ensuring safety. Early understanding of dose proportionality assists dose finding and simple and fast to conduct DDI study designs are advantageous. Single dose impairment studies despite non-proportional/time-dependent PK are often acceptability.Overall, the early understanding of the drug's safety profile is essential to ensure the safety of doses selected while preventing clinical trials with unnecessary exposure when using high doses or multiple doses. The information collected in this retrospective survey is a good reminder to tailor the early clinical program to the profile and needs of the molecule and consider regulatory opportunities to streamline the development path.

Phase I study of the pharmacokinetics and safety of rezafungin in subjects with moderate/severe hepatic impairment and matched control subjects.

INTRODUCTION: Rezafungin is a second-generation, once-weekly echinocandin antifungal approved for the treatment of invasive candidiasis, including candidemia. In phase II/III studies of rezafungin versus caspofungin, patients with severe hepatic impairment were excluded due to lack of caspofungin data in this population. This open-label, single-dose, phase I study evaluated the pharmacokinetics (primary objective) and safety of rezafungin in subjects with moderate or severe hepatic impairment versus matched, healthy subjects with normal hepatic function. METHODS: Eight subjects each with moderate (Child-Pugh B) or severe (Child-Pugh C) hepatic impairment were matched 1:1 with healthy subjects for age, sex, and body mass index. Each subject received a single 400-mg, intravenous, 1-h infusion of rezafungin. Plasma pharmacokinetic sampling was performed at various time points through 336 h postdose. Pharmacokinetic parameters were derived by non-compartmental analysis. Safety was assessed throughout. RESULTS: All 32 subjects received study treatment and were included in all analyses. Despite overlapping distributions of total plasma concentrations, based on geometric least-squares (LS) mean ratios, the area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero (prior to the start of infusion) to infinity (AUC0-∞) was 32% lower in subjects with moderate (LS mean ratio, 67.55; 90% confidence interval [CI]: 53.91, 84.65) and severe (LS mean ratio, 67.84; 90% CI: 57.49, 80.05) hepatic impairment versus matched healthy subjects. The maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) was 12% lower in moderate hepatic impairment and 28% lower in severe hepatic impairment groups. Linear regression showed no significant trend in the degree of hepatic impairment (based on Child-Pugh score) on AUC0-∞ or Cmax (p > 0.05). Treatment-emergent adverse events were reported in seven subjects (21.9%; three subjects in each of the hepatic impairment groups, and one healthy subject), none of which were severe, serious, or resulted in withdrawal. CONCLUSIONS: Rezafungin is well tolerated and can be administered to patients with moderate or severe hepatic impairment without the need for dose adjustment. The modest reduction in exposures in subjects with hepatic impairment is not clinically meaningful and is unlikely to impact efficacy.

Effect of Hepatic and Renal Impairment on the Pharmacokinetics of Dersimelagon (MT-7117), an Oral Melanocortin-1 Receptor Agonist.

Dersimelagon is an orally administered selective melanocortin-1 receptor agonist being investigated for treatment of erythropoietic protoporphyria, X-linked protoporphyria, and diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis. Dersimelagon is extensively metabolized in the liver, and potential recipients may have liver dysfunction. Further, effects of renal impairment on pharmacokinetic properties should be established in drugs intended for chronic use. Two separate studies (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04116476; NCT04656795) evaluated the effects of hepatic and renal impairment on dersimelagon pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability. Participants with mild (n = 7) or moderate (n = 8) hepatic impairment or normal hepatic function (n = 8) received a single oral 100-mg dersimelagon dose. Participants with mild (n = 8), moderate (n = 8), or severe (n = 8) renal impairment or normal renal function (n = 8) received a single 300-mg dose. Systemic exposure to dersimelagon was comparable with mild hepatic impairment but higher with moderate hepatic impairment (maximum observed plasma concentration, 1.56-fold higher; area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 extrapolated to infinity, 1.70-fold higher) compared with normal hepatic function. Maximum observed plasma concentration and area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 extrapolated to infinity were similar with moderate renal impairment but higher with mild (1.86- and 1.87-fold higher, respectively) and severe (1.17- and 1.45-fold higher, respectively) renal impairment versus normal renal function. Dersimelagon was generally well tolerated.

Estimation of linezolid exposure in patients with hepatic impairment using machine learning based on a population pharmacokinetic model.

PURPOSE: To investigate the pharmacokinetic changes of linezolid in patients with hepatic impairment and to explore a method to predict linezolid exposure. METHODS: Patients with hepatic impairment who received linezolid were recruited. A population pharmacokinetic model (PPK) was then built using NONMEM software. And based on the final model, virtual patients with rich concentration values was constructed through Monte Carlo simulations (MCS), which were used to build machine learning (ML) models to predict linezolid exposure levels. Finally, we investigated the risk factors for thrombocytopenia in patients included. RESULTS: A PPK model with population typical values of 3.83 L/h and 34.1 L for clearance and volume of distribution was established, and the severe hepatic impairment was identified as a significant covariate of clearance. Then, we built a series of ML models to predict the area under 0 -24 h concentration-time curve (AUC0-24) of linezolid based on virtual patients from MCS. The results showed that the Xgboost models showed the best predictive performance and were superior to the methods for estimating linezolid AUC0-24 based on though concentration or daily dose. Finally, we found that baseline platelet count, linezolid AUC0-24, and combination with fluoroquinolones were independent risk factors for thrombocytopenia, and based on this, we proposed a method for calculating the toxicity threshold of linezolid. CONCLUSION: In this study, we successfully constructed a PPK model for patients with hepatic impairment and used ML algorithm to estimate linezolid AUC0-24 based on limited data. Finally, we provided a method to determine the toxicity threshold of linezolid.

Effect of Hepatic Impairment on Trilaciclib Pharmacokinetics.

Trilaciclib is a first-in-class, intravenous cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 inhibitor approved for reducing the incidence of chemotherapy-induced myelosuppression in adult patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer receiving a platinum/etoposide-containing or topotecan-containing regimen. No dose adjustment is recommended for participants with mild hepatic impairment (HI) based on previous population pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis. This open-label, parallel-group study examined the impact of moderate and severe HI on the PK of trilaciclib. The study employed a reduced study design. Participants with moderate (Child-Pugh B, n = 8) and severe (Child-Pugh C, n = 5) HI and matched healthy controls (n = 11) received a single intravenous dose of trilaciclib 100 mg/m2. The unbound fraction of trilaciclib was comparable between the HI groups and the matched healthy control group. The unbound trilaciclib extent of exposure (i.e., area under the concentration-time curve) in participants with moderate and severe HI was ∼40% and ∼60% higher, respectively, compared with healthy matched controls based on Child-Pugh classification. Ad hoc analysis using National Cancer Institute classification showed similar results. The US Food and Drug Administration-approved trilaciclib dose of 240 mg/m2 should be reduced by ∼30%, to 170 mg/m2, for patients with moderate or severe HI.

Exploring the Impact of Hepatic Impairment on Pralsetinib Pharmacokinetics.

Pralsetinib is a kinase inhibitor indicated for the treatment of metastatic rearranged during transfection (RET) fusion-positive non-small cell lung cancer. Pralsetinib is primarily eliminated by the liver and hence hepatic impairment (HI) is likely alter its pharmacokinetics (PK). Mild HI has been shown to have minimal impact on the PK of pralsetinib. This hepatic impairment study aimed to determine the pralsetinib PK, safety and tolerability in subjects with moderate and severe HI, as defined by the Child-Pugh and National Cancer Institute Organ Dysfunction Working Group (NCI-ODWG) classification systems, in comparison to subjects with normal hepatic function. Based on the Child-Pugh classification, subjects with moderate and severe HI had similar systemic exposure (area under the plasma concentration time curve from time 0 to infinity [AUC0-∞]) to pralsetinib, with AUC0-∞ geometric mean ratios (GMR) of 1.12 and 0.858, respectively, compared to subjects with normal hepatic function. Results based on the NCI-ODWG classification criteria were comparable; the AUC0-∞ GMR were 1.22 and 0.858, respectively, for subjects with moderate and severe HI per NCI-ODWG versus those with normal hepatic function. These results suggested that moderate and severe hepatic impairment did not have a meaningful impact on the exposure to pralsetinib, thus not warranting a dose adjustment in this population.

Pharmacokinetics and Safety of Firsocostat, an Acetyl-Coenzyme A Carboxylase Inhibitor, in Participants with Mild, Moderate, and Severe Hepatic Impairment.

Firsocostat is an oral, liver-targeted inhibitor of acetyl-coenzyme A carboxylase in development for the treatment of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis. Hepatic organic anion transporting polypeptides play a significant role in the disposition of firsocostat with minimal contributions from uridine diphospho-glucuronosyltransferase and cytochrome P450 3A enzymes. This phase 1 study evaluated the pharmacokinetics and safety of firsocostat in participants with mild, moderate, or severe hepatic impairment. Participants with stable mild, moderate, or severe hepatic impairment (Child-Pugh A, B, or C, respectively [n = 10 per cohort]) and healthy matched controls with normal hepatic function (n = 10 per cohort) received a single oral dose of firsocostat (20 mg for mild and moderate hepatic impairment; 5 mg for severe hepatic impairment) with intensive pharmacokinetic sampling over 96 h. Safety was monitored throughout the study. Firsocostat plasma exposure (AUCinf) was 83%, 8.7-fold, and 30-fold higher in participants with mild, moderate, and severe hepatic impairment, respectively, relative to matched controls. Firsocostat was generally well tolerated, and all reported adverse events were mild in nature. Dose adjustment is not necessary for the administration of firsocostat in patients with mild hepatic impairment. However, based on the observed increases in firsocostat exposure, dose adjustment should be considered for patients with moderate or severe hepatic impairment, and additional safety and efficacy data from future clinical trials will further inform dose adjustment.

Effect of Hepatic Impairment on the Pharmacokinetics of Fenfluramine and Norfenfluramine.

Fenfluramine (Fintepla®) is approved for the treatment of seizures associated with the rare epileptic encephalopathies Dravet syndrome and Lennox-Gastaut syndrome. Fenfluramine is extensively metabolized; thus, patients with hepatic impairment (HI) might experience changes in exposure to fenfluramine or its metabolites. In this phase 1 study, we investigated the pharmacokinetics (PK) and safety of a single oral dose of 0.35 mg/kg fenfluramine in subjects with mild (n = 8), moderate (n = 8), or severe (n = 7) HI (Child-Pugh A/B/C, respectively) and healthy control subjects (n = 22) matched for sex, age, and BMI. All subjects underwent serial sampling to determine total plasma concentrations of fenfluramine and its active metabolite, norfenfluramine. Hepatic impairment was associated with increases in fenfluramine exposures, mainly area-under-the-curve (AUC). Geometric least squares mean ratios (90% confidence intervals) for fenfluramine AUC0-∞ in mild, moderate, and severe HI versus healthy controls were 1.98 (1.36-2.90), 2.13 (1.43-3.17), and 2.77 (1.82-4.24), respectively. Changes in exposure to norfenfluramine in mild, moderate, and severe HI were minimal compared with normal hepatic function. Exposures to fenfluramine and norfenfluramine in all HI groups were within the ranges that have been characterized in the overall development program, including ranges examined in exposure-response relationships for efficacy and safety in patients, and determined to have an acceptable safety profile. Mild and moderate HI had a modest effect on fenfluramine exposure that was not clinically meaningful, whereas the higher fenfluramine exposure in severe HI may require dose reduction based on general caution in this population. The modest decrease in norfenfluramine exposure is not considered clinically relevant.

Anticoagulation in venous thromboembolism for the general physician.

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is frequently encountered across various specialties. The management of VTE has become more nuanced, requiring consideration of several factors when deciding on the choice and duration of anticoagulation. This evidence-based review article summarises the current practice and evidence behind anticoagulation in VTE, incorporating national and international guidelines. Factors influencing decision-making around the choice and duration of anticoagulation, along with special circumstances such as cancer and antiphospholipid syndrome, are discussed. The clinical utility of thrombophilia screening is also addressed.

Pharmacokinetics of long-acting lenacapavir in participants with hepatic or renal impairment.

Lenacapavir is a novel, first-in-class, multistage inhibitor of HIV-1 capsid function approved for the treatment of multidrug-resistant HIV-1 infection in combination with other antiretrovirals for heavily treatment-experienced people with HIV. Two Phase 1, open-label, parallel-group, single-dose studies assessed the pharmacokinetics (PK) of lenacapavir in participants with moderate hepatic impairment [Child-Pugh-Turcotte (CPT) Class B: score 7-9] or severe renal impairment [15 ≤ creatinine clearance (CLcr) ≤29 mL/min] to inform lenacapavir dosing in HIV-1-infected individuals with organ impairment. In both studies, a single oral dose of 300 mg lenacapavir was administered to participants with normal (n = 10) or impaired (n = 10) hepatic/renal function who were matched for age (±10 years), sex, and body mass index (±20%). Lenacapavir exposures [area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 to infinity (AUCinf) and maximum concentration (Cmax)] were approximately 1.47- and 2.61-fold higher, respectively, in participants with moderate hepatic impairment compared to those with normal hepatic function, whereas lenacapavir AUCinf and Cmax were approximately 1.84- and 2.62-fold higher, respectively, in participants with severe renal impairment compared to those with normal renal function. Increased lenacapavir exposures with moderate hepatic or severe renal impairment were not considered clinically meaningful. Lenacapavir was considered generally safe and well tolerated in both studies. These results support the use of approved lenacapavir dosing regimen in patients with mild (CPT Class A: score 5-6) or moderate hepatic impairment as well as in patients with mild (60 ≤ CLcr ≤ 89 mL/min), moderate (30 ≤ CLcr ≤ 59 mL/min), and severe renal impairment.

A Phase I Clinical Study of the Pharmacokinetics and Safety of Prusogliptin Tablets in Subjects with Mild to Moderate Hepatic Insufficiency and Normal Liver Function.

BACKGROUND: Prusogliptin is a potent and selective DPP-4 inhibitor. In different animal models, Prusogliptin showed potential efficacy in the treatment of type 2 diabetes. However, the knowledge of its pharmacokinetics and safety in patients with liver dysfunction is limited. OBJECTIVES: The present study evaluated the pharmacokinetics and safety of Prusogliptin in subjects with mild or moderate hepatic impairment compared with healthy subjects. METHODS: According to the liver function of the subjects, we divided them into a mild liver dysfunction group, a moderate liver dysfunction group and a normal liver function group. All subjects in three groups received a single oral dose of Prusogliptin 100-mg tablets. Pharmacokinetics and safety index collection was carried out before and after taking the drug. Plasma pharmacokinetics of Prusogliptin were evaluated, and geometric least- -squares mean (GLSM) and associated 90% confidence intervals for insufficient groups versus the control group were calculated for plasma exposures. RESULTS: After a single oral administration of 100 mg of Prusogliptin tablets, the exposure level of Prusogliptin in subjects with mild liver dysfunction was slightly higher than that in healthy subjects. The exposure level of Prusogliptin was significantly increased in subjects with moderate liver dysfunction. There were no adverse events in this study. CONCLUSION: The exposure level of Prusogliptin in subjects with liver dysfunction was higher than that in healthy subjects. No participant was observed of adverse events. Prusogliptin tablets were safe and well tolerated in Chinese subjects with mild to moderate liver dysfunction and normal liver function.

Feasibility of Using Population Pharmacokinetics-Based Virtual Control Groups in Organ Impairment Studies.

This work aimed to assess the feasibility of using population pharmacokinetics (popPK) to generate virtual healthy control groups in organ impairment studies. Data from 11 organ impairment studies containing 18 organ impairment arms and 13 healthy control groups across 7 drugs were analyzed. Area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) and maximum concentration (Cmax) were calculated from popPK-simulated individual concentration-time profiles for participants in the healthy control groups, accounting for the participant's specific covariate(s) (N = 1000 replicates). The AUC and Cmax geometric mean ratios (GMRs; simulated healthy control/observed healthy control and observed organ impairment/simulated healthy control) were calculated. The simulated healthy control group geometric mean exposures were within 30% of the observed geometric mean exposures in 8 of the 11 studies (73%). The number of organ impairment arms for which the observed GMR (observed organ impairment/observed healthy control) and median of simulation-based GMRs (observed organ impairment/simulated healthy control) for AUC and Cmax being within the same fold change were 12 (67%) and 13 (72%) arms, respectively. The number of organ impairment arms for which the median of simulation-based AUC and Cmax GMRs were within the 90% confidence interval of the observed GMRs were 14 (72%) and 15 (83%), respectively. Poor concordance was observed for 1 drug (3 arms), where healthy participants' data were not incorporated in the popPK model. This work supports using popPK-based virtual control groups in organ impairment studies. Subsequent work should aim to establish best practices for constructing popPK-based virtual control groups.

Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Modeling of Lacosamide in Patients With Hepatic and Renal Impairment and Pediatric Populations to Support Pediatric Dosing Optimization.

PURPOSE: Lacosamide (LCM) is a new-generation anti-seizure medication that is efficacious in patients with focal seizures with or without secondary generalization. Until now, the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of LCM are still lacking in Chinese epilepsy patients, particularly for pediatric populations and patients with renal or hepatic impairment. METHODS: This study was conducted to develop a physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model to characterize the pharmacokinetics of LCM in Chinese populations and predict the pharmacokinetics of LCM in Chinese pediatric populations and patients with renal or hepatic impairment. Using data from clinical investigations, the developed PBPK model was validated by comparing predicted and observed blood concentration data. FINDINGS: Doses should be reduced to approximately 82%, 75%, 63%, and 76% of the Chinese healthy adult dose in patients with mild, moderate, and severe renal impairment and end-stage renal disease; and approximately 89%, 72%, and 36% of the Chinese healthy adult dose in patients with Child Pugh-A, B, and C hepatic impairment. For pediatric populations, intravenous doses should be adjusted to 1.75 mg/kg for newborns, 2.5 mg/kg for toddlers, 2.2 mg/kg mg for preschool and school age, and 2 mg/kg mg for adolescents to achieve an equivalent plasma exposure of 2 mg/kg LCM in adults. The oral doses should be adjusted to 20 mg for toddlers, 32 mg for preschool, 45 mg for school age, and 95 mg for adolescents to achieve an approximately equivalent plasma exposure of 100 mg LCM in adults. IMPLICATIONS: The PBPK model of LCM can be utilized to optimize dosage regimens for special populations.

Building a Predictive PBPK Model for Human OATP Substrates: a Strategic Framework for Early Evaluation of Clinical Pharmacokinetic Variations Using Pitavastatin as an Example.

To select a drug candidate for clinical development, accurately and promptly predicting human pharmacokinetic (PK) profiles, assessing drug-drug interactions (DDIs), and anticipating potential PK variations in disease populations are crucial steps in drug discovery. The complexity of predicting human PK significantly increases when hepatic transporters are involved in drug clearance (CL) and volume of distribution (Vss). A strategic framework is developed here, utilizing pitavastatin as an example. The framework includes the construction of a monkey physiologically-based PK (PBPK) model, model calibration to obtain scaling factors (SF) of in vitro-in vivo extrapolation (IVIVE) for various clearance parameters, human model development and validation, and assessment of DDIs and PK variations in disease populations. Through incorporating in vitro human parameters and calibrated SFs from the monkey model of 3.45, 0.14, and 1.17 for CLint,active, CLint,passive, and CLint,bile, respectively, and together with the relative fraction transported by individual transporters obtained from in vitro studies and the optimized Ki values for OATP inhibition, the model reasonably captured observed pitavastatin PK profiles, DDIs and PK variations in human subjects carrying genetic polymorphisms, i.e., AUC within 20%. Lastly, when applying the functional reduction based on measured OATP1B biomarkers, the model adequately predicted PK changes in the hepatic impairment population. The present study presents a strategic framework for early-stage drug development, enabling the prediction of PK profiles and assessment of PK variations in scenarios like DDIs, genetic polymorphism, and hepatic impairment-related disease states, specifically focusing on OATP substrates.

Stepwise Introduction of Elexacaftor-Tezacaftor-Ivacaftor in Patients With Cystic Fibrosis and Liver Cirrhosis Child-Pugh A or B Using Clinical and Therapeutic Drug Monitoring: A Case Series.

PURPOSE: Cystic fibrosis (CF) is a monogenetic disease caused by mutations in the gene encoding the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) protein and affecting multiple organs, including the lungs and liver. Almost 90% of people affected carry at least 1 Phe508del CFTR mutation. Medical treatment with the CFTR-modulating drug elexacaftor-tezacaftor-ivacaftor (ETI) has been proven to be efficacious in carriers of at least 1 Phe508del CFTR mutation. Use of ETI in patients with CF (pwCF) and liver cirrhosis is still controversial. Therefore, stepwise introduction of ETI in pwCF and liver cirrhosis Child-Pugh A or B was evaluated using clinical and therapeutic drug monitoring. METHODS: Seven consecutive pwCF received ETI. Four dosing steps were defined, at each of which the patients underwent clinical examination, routine blood tests, and therapeutic drug monitoring. Exposure of elexacaftor, tezacaftor, and ivacaftor was assessed by means of determination of AUC. FINDINGS: ETI was successfully introduced and maintained in all pwCF. In those with Child-Pugh B cirrhosis (n = 2), diminishment of the dose as recommended by the label resulted in AUC values that were lower than the mean AUC values in pwCF without hepatic impairment, as reported previously. IMPLICATIONS: Despite the limitations of this small case series, stepwise elevation of ETI dose did not induce clinical adverse effects or increases in serum liver test results under strict clinical follow-up and therapeutic drug monitoring, and may allow tolerable introduction of this therapy in pwCF and cirrhosis Child-Pugh A and possibly B.