Multiparametric MRI radiomics for predicting disease-free survival and high-risk histopathological features for tumor recurrence in endometrial cancer.

Background: Current preoperative imaging is insufficient to predict survival and tumor recurrence in endometrial cancer (EC), necessitating invasive procedures for risk stratification. Purpose: To establish a multiparametric MRI radiomics model for predicting disease-free survival (DFS) and high-risk histopathologic features in EC. Methods: This retrospective study included 71 patients with histopathology-proven EC and preoperative MRI over a 10-year period. Clinicopathology data were extracted from health records. Manual MRI segmentation was performed on T2-weighted (T2W), apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps and dynamic contrast-enhanced T1-weighted images (DCE T1WI). Radiomic feature (RF) extraction was performed with PyRadiomics. Associations between RF and histopathologic features were assessed using logistic regression. Associations between DFS and RF or clinicopathologic features were assessed using the Cox proportional hazards model. All RF with univariate analysis p-value < 0.2 were included in elastic net analysis to build radiomic signatures. Results: The 3-year DFS rate was 68% (95% CI = 57%-80%). There were no significant clinicopathologic predictors for DFS, whilst the radiomics signature was a strong predictor of DFS (p<0.001, HR 3.62, 95% CI 1.94, 6.75). From 107 RF extracted, significant predictive elastic net radiomic signatures were established for deep myometrial invasion (p=0.0097, OR 4.81, 95% CI 1.46, 15.79), hysterectomy grade (p=0.002, OR 5.12, 95% CI 1.82, 14.45), hysterectomy histology (p=0.0061, OR 18.25, 95% CI 2.29,145.24) and lymphovascular space invasion (p<0.001, OR 5.45, 95% CI 2.07, 14.36). Conclusion: Multiparametric MRI radiomics has the potential to create a non-invasive a priori approach to predicting DFS and high-risk histopathologic features in EC.

Serum Proteomic Profiles of Patients with High and Low Risk of Endometrial Cancer Recurrence.

Endometrial cancer is the most common gynecological cancer worldwide. Classifying endometrial cancer into low- or high-risk groups based on the following features is recommended: tumor grade, lymphovascular space invasion, myometrial involvement, and non-endometrioid histology. Despite the recent progress in molecular profiling of endometrial cancer, a substantial group of patients are misclassified based on the current criteria. This study aimed to identify proteins that could be used as biomarkers for the stratification of endometrial cancer patients into low- or high-risk groups. The proteomic analysis of serum samples from endometrial cancer patients was performed using matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS). The data were then analyzed using chemometric algorithms to identify potential biomarkers. Nineteen precursor ions were identified as fragments of eighteen proteins which included (1) connective tissue matrix proteins, (2) cytoskeletal proteins, and (3) innate immune system molecules and stress proteins. These biomarkers could be used to stratify the high- and low-risk patients, thus enabling more precise treatment decisions.

Outcomes for patients with high-risk endometrial cancer undergoing sentinel lymph node assessment versus full lymphadenectomy.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to determine the progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) among patients with high-risk endometrial cancer (EC) who underwent sentinel lymph node (SLN) mapping and dissection compared to patients who underwent pelvic +/- para-aortic lymphadenectomy (LND). METHODS: Patients with newly diagnosed high-risk EC were identified. Inclusion criteria included patients who underwent primary surgical management from January 1, 2014 to September 1, 2020 at our institution. Patients were categorized into either the SLN or LND group based on their method of planned lymph node assessment. Patients in the SLN group had dye injected followed by successful bilateral lymph node mapping, retrieval, and processing per our institutional protocol. Clinicopathological and follow-up data were extracted from patient's medical records. The t-test or Mann-Whitney test was used to compare continuous variables and Chi-squared or Fisher's exact test were used for categorical variables. Progression-free survival (PFS) was calculated from the date of initial surgery to the date of progression, death, or last follow-up. Overall survival (OS) was calculated from the date of surgical staging to the date of death or last follow-up. Three-year PFS and OS were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and the log-rank test was used to compare cohorts. Multivariable Cox regression models were used to assess the relationship between nodal assessment cohort and OS/PFS while adjusting for age, adjuvant therapy, and surgical approach. A result was considered statistically significant at the p < 0.05 level of significance and all statistical analysis was done using SAS version 9.4 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC). RESULTS: Out of 674 patients diagnosed with EC during the study period, 189 were diagnosed with high-risk EC based on our criteria. Forty-six (23.7%) patients underwent SLN assessment and 143 (73.7%) underwent LND. No difference was observed between the two groups in regards to age, histology, stage, body mass index, tumors myometrial invasion, lymphovascular space invasion, or peritoneal washing positivity. Patients in the SLN group underwent robotic-assisted procedures more frequently than those in the LND group (p < 0.0001). The three-year PFS rate was 71.1% (95% CI 51.3-84.0%) in the SLN group and 71.3% (95% CI 62.0-78.6%) in the LND group (p = 0.91). The unadjusted hazard ratio (HR) for recurrence in the SLN versus LND group was 1.11 (95% CI 0.56-2.18; p = 0.77), and after adjusting for age, adjuvant therapy, and surgical approach, the HR for recurrence was 1.04 (95% CI 0.47-2.30, p = 0.91). The three-year OS rate was 81.1% (95% CI 51.1-93.7%) in the SLN group and 95.1% (95% CI 89.4-97.8%) in the LND group (p = 0.009). Although the unadjusted HR for death was 3.74 in the SLN vs LND group (95% CI 1.39-10.09; p = 0.009), when adjusted for age, adjuvant therapy, and surgical approach, it was no longer significant with a HR of 2.90 (95% CI 0.94-8.95, p = 0.06). CONCLUSIONS: There was no difference in three-year PFS in patients diagnosed with high-risk EC who underwent SLN evaluation compared to those who underwent full LND in our cohort. The SLN group did experience shorter unadjusted OS; however, when adjusting for age, adjuvant therapy and surgical approach, there was no difference OS in patients who underwent SLN compared to LND.

Non-endometrioid endometrial cancer: analysis of recurrence pattern and identification of prognostic and treatment factors affecting recurrence and survival.

PURPOSE: We investigated the characteristics of recurrence pattern and survival of patients with non-endometrioid endometrial cancer (NEEC) and attempted to identify prognostic and treatment factors affecting disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) of these patients. METHODS: Fifty-seven patients with histologically confirmed International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage IA-IVA NEEC from February 2003 to December 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS: The 5­year DFS and OS rates of the total cohort were 50.6% and 56.1%, respectively. Recurrence occurred in 28 patients (49.1%) during follow-up, and the most common recurrence pattern was distant metastasis (DM; 78.6% of total recurrences). The occurrence of relapse significantly reduced 5­year OS (recurrence group vs. non-recurrence group: 12.5% vs. 100%; p < 0.001). In univariate analysis, adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) group showed significantly higher 5­year DFS (56.7% vs. 37.9%; p = 0.04), local recurrence-free survival (91.6% vs. 50.5%; p = 0.01), and regional recurrence-free survival (88.2% vs. 56.5%; p < 0.01) than the non-RT group. In multivariate analysis, advanced FIGO stage was identified as a negative prognostic factor for DFS and OS. Lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI) and adjuvant RT were independent prognostic factors for DFS. CONCLUSION: The most common recurrence pattern observed in patients with NEEC was DM. FIGO stage and LVSI were identified as prognostic factors for survival, and RT was identified as a therapeutic modality that could increase DFS. To improve the OS of patients with NEEC, the addition of effective chemotherapy that can reduce DM may be important.

L1CAM expression as a predictor of platinum response in high-risk endometrial carcinoma.

For high-risk endometrial cancer (EC) patients, adjuvant chemotherapy is recommended to improve outcome. Yet, predictive biomarkers for response to platinum-based chemotherapy (Pt-aCT) are currently lacking. We tested expression of L1 cell-adhesion molecule (L1CAM), a well-recognised marker of poor prognosis in EC, in tumour samples from high-risk EC patients, to explore its role as a predictive marker of Pt-aCT response. L1CAM expression was determined using RT-qPCR and immunohistochemistry in a cohort of high-risk EC patients treated with Pt-aCT and validated in a multicentric independent cohort. The association between L1CAM and clinicopathologic features and L1CAM additive value in predicting platinum response were determined. The effect of L1CAM gene silencing on response to carboplatin was functionally tested on primary L1CAM-expressing cells. Increased L1CAM expression at both genetic and protein level correlated with high-grade, non-endometrioid histology and poor response to platinum treatment. A predictive model adding L1CAM to prognostic clinical variables significantly improved platinum response prediction (C-index 78.1%, P = .012). In multivariate survival analysis, L1CAM expression was significantly associated with poor outcome (HR: 2.03, P = .019), potentially through an indirect effect, mediated by its influence on response to chemotherapy. In vitro, inhibition of L1CAM significantly increased cell sensitivity to carboplatin, supporting a mechanistic link between L1CAM expression and response to platinum in EC cells. In conclusion, we have demonstrated the role of L1CAM in the prediction of response to Pt-aCT in two independent cohorts of high-risk EC patients. L1CAM is a promising candidate biomarker to optimise decision making in high-risk patients who are eligible for Pt-aCT.

Lymphadenectomy for high-grade endometrial cancer: Does it impact lymph node recurrence?

INTRODUCTION: The diagnostic role of lymph node (LN) assessment is established in endometrial cancer. Our study assesses whether surgical removal of metastatic LNs has oncologic benefit in high-grade endometrial cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: High-grade endometrial cancer cases (2000-2010) were collected from two tertiary cancer centres. In patients with at least one positive LN, recurrence free survival (RFS) was compared by the number of LNs removed. Factors predicting nodal recurrence (NR) were explored. Univariate statistical analyses by log rank test and multivariable cox proportional hazards model were performed using SAS version 9.4. RESULTS: Of 570 patients identified, 334 patients underwent staging lymphadenectomy, 74 (22.2%) patients had at least one positive LN. The median RFS with at least one positive lymph node was 87.1 months (95% CI ≥ 14.3) when greater than 15 LNs were removed, compared to 16.9 months (95% CI, 13.6-35.6) and 17.3 months (95% CI, 8.5-39.8) when 5-15 and less than 5 LNs were removed, respectively (p = 0.02). In the cohort of 570 patients, there were 167 disease recurrences with location described on imaging, 98 (58.7%) had a NR and 69 (41.3%) recurred at other sites. Multivariable modeling identified that only positive LNs at surgical staging predicted NR (HR 3.8, 95% CI 1.4-10.2). CONCLUSION: In high-grade endometrial cancer, positive LNs predict NR, and RFS is longer with a more extensive LN dissection in women with positive LNs. Future prospective studies should evaluate the oncologic benefit of surgical removal of metastatic LNs in high-grade endometrial cancer.

Could the Long-Term Oncological Safety of Laparoscopic Surgery in Low-Risk Endometrial Cancer also Be Valid for the High-Intermediate- and High-Risk Patients? A Multi-Center Turkish Gynecologic Oncology Group Study Conducted with 2745 Endometrial Cancer Cases. (TRSGO-End-001).

This study was conducted to compare the long-term oncological outcomes of laparotomy and laparoscopic surgeries in endometrial cancer under the light of the 2016 ESMO-ESGO-ESTRO risk classification system, with particular focus on the high-intermediate- and high-risk categories. Using multicentric databases between January 2005 and January 2016, disease-free and overall survivals of 2745 endometrial cancer cases were compared according to the surgery route (laparotomy vs. laparoscopy). The high-intermediate- and high-risk patients were defined with respect to the 2016 ESMO-ESGO-ESTRO risk classification system, and they were analyzed with respect to differences in survival rates. Of the 2745 patients, 1743 (63.5%) were operated by laparotomy, and the remaining were operated with laparoscopy. The total numbers of high-intermediate- and high-risk endometrial cancer cases were 734 (45%) patients in the laparotomy group and 307 (30.7%) patients in the laparoscopy group. Disease-free and overall survivals were not statistically different when compared between laparoscopy and laparotomy groups in terms of low-, intermediate-, high-intermediate- and high-risk endometrial cancer. In conclusion, regardless of the endometrial cancer risk category, long-term oncological outcomes of the laparoscopic approach were found to be comparable to those treated with laparotomy. Our results are encouraging to consider laparoscopic surgery for high-intermediate- and high-risk endometrial cancer cases.

Association of preoperative serum HE4 levels on the survival of patients with endometrial cancer.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the association between preoperative serum human epididymis protein 4 (HE4) levels and survival outcomes in endometrial cancer (EC) patients. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted of EC patients who were scheduled for surgery between September 2013 and May 2014 at Rajavithi Hospital. Association between preoperative serum HE4 levels and clinicopathological characteristics were evaluated. Cox proportional-hazards model was used to compare overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) between EC patients who had high serum HE4 levels and those who did not. RESULTS: A total of 86 EC patients were enrolled. Serum HE4 levels was significantly associated with older age (p < 0.001), postmenopausal women (p = 0.001), large tumor size (p < 0.001), presence of lymphovascular invasion (p = 0.022), deep myometrial invasion (p = 0.001), lymph node metastasis (0.017), high-risk group (p < 0.001), and death status (p = 0.002). With a median follow-up of 53 months, the 3-years OS and PFS of EC patients who had high serum HE4 levels were significantly poorer than those who did not (71% vs 95.8%, and 67.7% vs 91.7%, respectively). A high serum HE4 level was a significant prognostic factor for OS and RFS from the univariate analysis. However, it was not a significant prognostic factor in the multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION: Preoperative high serum HE4 levels were significantly associated with the worse clinicopathological characteristic of EC patients and decreased OS and RFS. Although there was no strong independent prognostic factor for survival, serum HE4 levels could be used in an algorithm for stratifying high-risk EC patients with more proper management.

Modeling ANXA2-overexpressing circulating tumor cells homing and high throughput screening for metastasis impairment in endometrial carcinomas.

Endometrial cancer (EC) is the most common neoplasm of the female reproductive tract in the developed world. Patients usually are diagnosed in early stage having a good prognosis. However, up to 20-25% of patients are diagnosed in advanced stages and have a higher risk of recurrence, making the prognosis worse. Previously studies identified ANXA2 as a predictor of recurrent disease in EC even in low risk patients. Furthermore, Circulating Tumor Cells (CTC) released from the primary tumor into the bloodstream, are plasticity entities responsible of the process of metastasis, becoming into an attractive clinical target. In this work we validated ANXA2 expression in CTC from high-risk EC patients. After that, we modelled in vitro and in vivo the tumor cell attachment of ANXA2-expressing CTC to the endothelium and the homing for the generation of micrometastasis. ANXA2 overexpression does not provide an advantage in the adhesion process of CTC, but it could be playing an important role in more advanced steps, conferring a greater homing capacity. We also performed a high-throughput screening (HTS) for compounds specifically targeting ANXA2, and selected Daunorubicin as candidate hit. Finally, we validated Daunorubicin in a 3D transendothelial migration system and also in a in vivo model of advanced EC, demonstrating the ability of Daunorubicin to inhibit the proliferation of ANXA2-overexpressing tumor cells.

Avoiding Full Lymphadenectomies in Intermediate- and High-Risk Endometrial Cancer by Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy Implementation.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the role of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) to avoid staging lymphadenectomies by detecting nodal metastasis in intermediate- and high-risk endometrial cancer (EC). METHODS: A single institutional retrospective study was performed including all patients with intermediate- and high-risk EC who underwent surgical nodal staging between January 2012 and December 2019. Patients with disseminated disease detected on imaging techniques or at the time of surgery were excluded. Patients were evaluable if they underwent nodal staging with SLNB and pelvic (PLD) and paraaortic (PALD) lymph node dissection. We analyzed the accuracy of the sentinel lymph node technique. Only patients with at least one sentinel lymph node (SLN) detected were included in the sensitivity and negative predictive value (NPV) analyses. The tracers used were technetium 99m, blue dye, and indocyanine green. RESULTS: Eighty-eight patients presented intermediate- and high-risk EC (51 patients and 37 patients respectively) and underwent SLNB with consecutive PLD and PALD. The median (range) number of sentinel nodes retrieved was 2.9 (0-11). The global detection rate of SLN was 96.6% with a bilateral detection of 80.7% when considering all tracers used. However, when combination of indocyanine green and technetium was used the bilateral detection rate was 90.3%. Nodal metastases were detected in 17 (19.3%) cases, 8 (47%) of them corresponded to low volume metastasis (LVM), 7 (87.5%) of them diagnosed at ultrastaging pathologic exam. Finally, we obtained a sensitivity of 90%, a NPV of 97.5%, and a false negative rate (FNR) of 10% in the intermediate-risk EC compared to sensitivity of 85.7%, NPV of 96.6%, and FNR of 14.3% in the high-risk EC group. The only patient with isolated paraaortic nodal metastasis was found at the high-risk group, 1.1%. CONCLUSIONS: According to our results, full lymphadenectomy could be avoided by performing SLNB in patients with intermediate-risk EC because the only false negative case detected was at the beginning of ICG learning curve. For high-risk EC patients we did not find enough evidence to support the systematic avoidance of staging full lymph node dissection. Nevertheless, SLNB should be performed in all cases of EC as it improves LVM diagnosis substantially.

ARID1A and CTNNB1/ß-Catenin Molecular Status Affects the Clinicopathologic Features and Prognosis of Endometrial Carcinoma: Implications for an Improved Surrogate Molecular Classification.

The collaborative Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) project identified four distinct prognostic groups of endometrial carcinoma (EC) based on molecular alterations: (i) the ultramutated subtype that encompasses POLE mutated (POLE) cases; (ii) the hypermutated subtype, characterized by MisMatch Repair deficiency (MMRd); (iii) the copy-number high subtype, with p53 abnormal/mutated features (p53abn); (iv) the copy-number low subtype, known as No Specific Molecular Profile (NSMP). Although the prognostic value of TCGA molecular classification, NSMP carcinomas present a wide variability in molecular alterations and biological aggressiveness. This study aims to investigate the impact of ARID1A and CTNNB1/ß-catenin alterations by targeted Next-generation sequencing (NGS) and immunohistochemistry (IHC) in a consecutive series of 125 molecularly classified ECs. NGS and IHC were used to assign surrogate TCGA groups and to identify molecular alterations of multiple target genes including POLE, PTEN, ARID1A, CTNNB1, TP53. Associations with clinicopathologic parameters, molecular subtypes, and outcomes identified NSMP category as the most heterogeneous group in terms of clinicopathologic features and outcome. Integration of surrogate TCGA molecular classification with ARID1A and ß-catenin analysis showed NSMP cases with ARID1A mutation characterized by the worst outcome with early recurrence, while NSMP tumors with ARID1A wild-type and ß-catenin alteration had indolent clinicopathologic features and no recurrence. This study indicates how the identification of ARID1A and ß-catenin alterations in EC represents a simple and effective way to characterize NSMP tumor aggressiveness and metastatic potential.

Comparison of minimally invasive surgery with laparotomic approach in the treatment of high risk endometrial cancer: A systematic review.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze all published studies comparing minimally invasive surgery (MIS) with laparotomic one in the surgical treatment of high-risk endometrial cancer (EC) in term of operative, peri-operative and oncological outcomes. DATA SOURCES: We conducted a systematic literature search in PubMed between January 1995-March 2019. METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION: Titles and abstracts were analyzed by two reviewers. A set of explicit criteria was used for selection of literature: 1) randomized controlled trials (RCT), prospective or retrospective cohort studies, given the rarity of this tumor and the concomitant lack of data in the form of large trials, all reviewed original report publications with an appropriate number of subjects were considered and included; 2) participants of interest being patients who have suffered from high risk EC 3) the outcome measures including overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS) and recurrence, (4) English language, (5) abstract available. RESULTS: Thirty relevant articles were selected for full reading. For final analysis 20 studies were selected. Then, as second step, the full articles were evaluated to determine whether full inclusion criteria were met. In total, 9 papers were identified and included. CONCLUSION: MIS appears to be safe in the management of high-risk EC patients, showing better perioperative and postoperative outcomes and comparable oncological outcomes than open surgery. Prospective randomized trial would be needed to confirm this data.

High risk endometrial cancer: Clues towards a revision of the therapeutic paradigm.

INTRODUCTION: Endometrial cancer (EC) is a major cause of mortality worldwide with nearly 200 000 cases diagnosed annually. The recent ESMO-ESGO-ESTRO guidelines include a new classification defining a heterogeneous high-risk group of recurrence (HR) comprising: (i) endometrioid (type 1) FIGO stage IB grade 3 tumors (type 1/G3ECs), (ii) non-endometrioid tumors (type 2) and (iii) advanced stages whatever the histological type (Colombo et al., 2016). AREAS COVERED: The aim of this review is to summarize current evidence for therapeutic approaches in HR-EC according to the updated ESMO-ESGO-ESTRO classification by discussing the following issues: i) HR-EC heterogeneity, (ii) prognostic factors and current classification, and (iii) optimal staging strategies (site and extent) and the role of adjuvant treatment. EXPERT COMMENTARY: HR-EC treatment is based on surgery, radiation therapy, brachytherapy, and chemotherapy, either alone or sequentially, in combination with other treatments depending on disease stage, histological grade and risk group. Specific trials are needed to establish the role of systematic pelvic and paraaortic lymphadenectomy, adjuvant therapies and targeted drugs. Although molecular characterization has been reported to customize therapeutic strategies and thereby improve therapeutic outcomes in EC, none of the targeted agents investigated (antiangiogenic and mTOR/PI3K pathway inhibitor agents) have resulted in a change in clinical practice in HR-EC.

Lymphadenectomy in elderly patients with high-intermediate-risk, high-risk or advanced endometrial cancer: Time to move from personalized cancer medicine to personalized patient medicine!

BACKGROUND: Pelvic and paraaortic lymphadenectomy are recommended for women with high-intermediate, high-risk and advanced endometrial cancer (EC). Lymphadenectomy is less frequently performed in elderly patients than in younger patients. We examined the survival of elderly women diagnosed with high-risk EC according to whether lymphadenectomy was performed or not. METHODS: We selected women over 70 years with high-intermediate risk, high-risk or advanced EC from a multicenter retrospective cohort of women diagnosed between 2001 and 2013. Multivariate logistic regression models and Cox proportional hazards survival methods for overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) were used for analyses. RESULTS: 71 women had lymphadenectomy and were compared with the 213 who did not. Recurrence was similar in both groups (42% vs 33%, respectively, p = 0.17) but more deaths were reported in the group without lymphadenectomy (38% vs 23%, respectively, p < 0.001). There was no difference in adjuvant treatment in the two groups (17% vs 27%, respectively, p = 0.27). Elderly patients without lymphadenectomy had lower 3-year DFS (56% vs 71%, p = 0.076), CSS (67% vs 85%, p < 0.001) and OS (50% vs 71% p < 0.001). The Cox proportional hazard models showed independently poorer prognosis in women without lymphadenectomy (3.027, 95% CI 1.58-5.81, p < 0.001), histology type 2 (3.46, 95% CI 1.51-7.97, p = 0.003) and lymphovascular space involvement (3.47, 95% CI 1.35-8.98, p = 0.01) on 3-year CSS. CONCLUSION: No lymphadenectomy in elderly patients with high-risk or advanced EC is independently associated with poorer prognosis. Elderly patients with EC should benefit from lymphadenectomy when indicated.

Impact of adjuvant treatment on outcome in high-risk early-stage endometrial cancer: a retrospective three-center study.

OBJECTIVE: High grade and non-endometrioid endometrial cancers carry a poor prognosis, and the lack of randomized prospective data has led to a wide range of practice regarding adjuvant therapy. The objective of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of different treatment strategies in patients with high-risk, early-stage endometrial cancer. METHODS: Patients with high-grade endometrioid, serous endometrial cancer and carcinosarcoma diagnosed between 2000 and 2012 were identified from databases in three gynecologic oncology divisions, in Toronto and in Israel. Adjuvant treatment practices differed across the centers, creating a heterogeneous cohort. A comparison of stage I patients stratified by adjuvant treatment was undertaken. Log-rank tests and Cox proportional hazards models were employed to compare recurrence and survival across treatment groups. RESULTS: 490patients with high risk endometrial cancer were identified, among them 213 patients with stage I disease. Israeli patients received more chemotherapy (41% vs 10% in stage I disease; P<0.001) than patients in Toronto. Chemotherapy was not associated with improved disease-free, disease-specific or overall survival, nor was it associated with fewer distant recurrences (50% vs 54%). Radiation was also not associated with improved recurrence or survival, nor did it affect the pattern of recurrence. On Cox multivariable analysis, neither radiation treatment nor chemotherapy were significantly associated with outcome (HR for recurrence, 0.72 for pelvic radiation (P=0.46) and 1.99 for chemotherapy (P=0.09); HR for death, 0.67 for pelvic radiation (P=0.29) and 1.03 for chemotherapy (P=0.94)). CONCLUSIONS: In this retrospective analysis, neither adjuvant radiation nor chemotherapy were associated with improved outcome in stage I, high risk endometrial cancer.

Unsupervised Clustering of Immunohistochemical Markers to Define High-Risk Endometrial Cancer.

Considerable heterogeneity exists in outcomes of early endometrial cancer (EC) according to the type but also the histological grading. Our goal was to describe the immunohistochemical profiles of type I EC according to grades and type II EC, to identify groups of interacting proteins using principal component analysis (PCA) and unsupervised clustering. We studied 13 immunohistochemical markers (steroid receptors, pro/anti-apoptotic proteins, metalloproteinases (MMP) and tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase (TIMP), and CD44 isoforms known for their role in endometrial pathology. Co-expressed proteins associated with the type, grade and outcome of EC were determined by PCA and unsupervised clustering. PCA identified three functional groups of proteins from 43 tissue samples (38 type I and 5 type II EC): the first was characterized by p53 expression; the second by MMPs, bcl-2, PR B and CD44v6; and the third by ER alpha, PR A, TIMP-2 and CD44v3. Unsupervised clustering found two main clusters of proteins, with both type I grade 3 and type II EC exhibiting the same cluster profile. PCA and unsupervised clustering of immunohistochemical markers in EC contribute to a better comprehension and classification of the disease.

Lymph node evaluation in high-risk early stage endometrial cancer: A multi-institutional retrospective analysis comparing the sentinel lymph node (SLN) algorithm and SLN with selective lymphadenectomy.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the impact of the sentinel lymph node mapping algorithm (SLN-A) on the staging in high-risk endometrial cancer (EC) compared to SLN plus selective lymphadenectomy (S-LND). METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the database from a multicenter collaboration that included women with high risk features who underwent primary surgical staging. RESULTS: One-hundred and seventy-one women were identified (171), 66 in the SLN-A and 105 in the S-LND group, respectively. Pelvic LD was performed on 115 patients (67.2%) and aortic dissection was performed in 54/105 of the women in the S-LND group (51%). The 5-year comparison did not show a significant difference in the strategy adopted for nodal staging, regarding disease-free survival (DFS) [HR: 0.82; 95% CI 0.53-1.28; p = 0.390]. CONCLUSIONS: In this study focusing on women with EC in the HR groups, we did not find a difference in the 5-year DFS when comparing the SLN-A strategy with S-LND. The SLN strategy did not seem to compromise the prognosis of patients with a higher risk of recurrence.

Patterns of care and the survival of elderly patients with high-risk endometrial cancer: A case-control study from the FRANCOGYN group.

BACKGROUND: The standard of care of endometrial cancer involves complex procedures such as pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy and omentectomy, particularly for high-risk endometrial cancer. Few data are available about these complex surgical procedures and adjuvant therapy in elderly women. We aim to examine treatment and survival of elderly women diagnosed with high-risk endometrial cancer. STUDY DESIGN: We performed a case-control study of women diagnosed between 2001 and 2013 with high-risk endometrial cancers. Women older than 70 years (n = 198) were compared with patients <70 years (n = 198) after matching on high-risk for recurrence and LVSI status. RESULTS: Elderly patients had lymphadenectomies less frequently compared with younger patients (76% vs 96%, p < 0.001) and no adjuvant treatment more frequently (17% vs 8%, p = 0.005) due to less chemotherapy being administered (23% vs 46%, p < 0.001). The 3-year DFS, CSS and OS of patients ≥70 years was 52% (43-61), 81% (74-88) and 61% (53-70), respectively. These were significantly lower than the 3-year DFS, CSS, and OS of younger patients, which was 75% (68-82) (p < 0.001), 92% (87-96) (p < 0.008) and 75% (69-82) (p = 0.018), respectively. Cox proportional hazard models found that elderly women had 57% increased risk of recurrence (hazard ratio 1.57, 95% CI 1.04-2.39) compared with younger patients. CONCLUSION: Although we found an independently significant lower DFS in elderly patients with high-risk endometrial cancer when compared with young patients, elderly women are less likely to be treated with lymphadenectomy and chemotherapy. Specific guidelines for management of elderly patients with high-risk endometrial cancer are required to improve their prognosis.

Comparison of three surgical approaches for staging lymphadenectomy in high-risk endometrial cancer.

OBJECTIVE: To compare laparotomy, laparoscopy, and robotic surgical approaches to lymphadenectomy for high-risk endometrial cancer staging. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study enrolled patients who underwent surgery for pathologic high-risk endometrial carcinoma at the University Health Network, Toronto, Canada, between January 1, 2005 and December 31, 2013. The primary outcome, the median number of nodes retrieved, was compared based on surgical technique. The secondary outcome was the detection of metastatic nodes. RESULTS: A total of 176 patients who underwent surgery for high-risk endometrial cancer were included, of whom 147 (83.5%) had pelvic and 78 (44.3%) had para-aortic lymphadenectomy. Laparotomy, laparoscopy, and robotic approaches were applied for 69 (39.2%), 44 (25.0%), and 63 (35.8%) patients, respectively. Minimally-invasive staging was associated with an increased proportion of patients undergoing pelvic lymphadenectomy compared with laparotomy (P=0.005). The median number of nodes removed in the pelvis and para-aortic regions did not differ between surgical approaches. The detection of metastatic nodes was also similar between the groups. Increased blood loss (P<0.001) and longer hospital admission (P<0.001) were observed with laparotomy procedures. CONCLUSION: All three techniques demonstrated adequate staging of high-risk endometrial carcinoma. Based on improved peri-operative outcomes, the use of minimally-invasive techniques is advocated where appropriate.

Adjuvant concurrent chemoradiation followed by chemotherapy for high-risk endometrial cancer.

OBJECTIVE: The adjuvant treatment of high-risk endometrial cancer (HREC) remains controversial. This prospective phase-II clinical trial was conducted to evaluate the adjuvant concurrent chemoradiotherapy followed by chemotherapy in patients with HREC. METHODS: Altogether 122 patients were enrolled between January 2007 and January 2013, in which 112 were analyzable. The inclusion criteria included endometrioid endometrial cancer of histological grade 3 and with greater than 50% myometrial invasion, cervical stromal invasion, pelvic and/or para-aortic lymph node metastases; non-endometrioid endometrial cancer; no residual disease and distant metastases. Pelvic radiation was administered with cisplatin on days 1 and 28. Para-aortic radiation was administered with confirmed para-aortic lymph node metastases, and vaginal afterloading brachytherapy with cervical stromal invasion after total hysterectomy. Four courses of paclitaxel and carboplatin (PC) or cisplatin, cyclophosphamide and epirubicin (CEP) were administered at three-week interval after radiation. RESULTS: Ninety-six patients (85.7%) completed the planned treatment. Treatment discontinuation was the result of toxicity (5/112, 4.5%), disease progression (8/112, 7.1%), and patients refusal (3/112, 2.7%). There was no life-threatening toxicity. Twenty-five (22.3%) patients recurred, in which 4 cases recurred in the field of radiation, and 13 (11.6%) patients died of endometrial cancer during follow-up. The estimated five-year progression-free survival and overall survival were 73% and 84%, respectively. Adverse effects were less common in patients who received PC than CEP (p=0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This regimen demonstrated acceptable toxicity and good survival outcomes despite a preponderance (62.5%) of late stage disease. PC showed less adverse effects than CEP. A well designed randomized trial is under development. CLINICAL TRIAL ID: https://clinicaltrials.gov/: 070148-7.