Global Infection Rate of Rotavirus C during 1980-2022 and Analysis of Critical Factors in the Host Range Restriction of Virus VP4.

Information on rotavirus C (RVC) infection is lacking, partly because the prevalence of RVC among humans and animals worldwide is undefined. Data on the characteristics of the P genotype among RVC strains are also required. We performed systematic searches on the infection rates of RVC since 1980 based on the literature and gene sequences of the PubMed and GenBank databases. A phylogenetic tree of VP4 genes was constructed to evaluate the distribution of the P genotype of RVC from various hosts. The specific mutation motifs in VP8* with P [2]/P [4]/P [5] specificity were analyzed to elucidate their roles in host range restriction. The rate of RVC infection in humans has fallen from 3% before 2009 to 1%, whereas in animals it has risen from 10% to 25%. The P genotype of RVC showed strict host species specificity, and current human RVC infections are exclusively caused by genotype P [2]. In the VP8* hemagglutinin domain of the P [4]/P [5] genotype of swine RVC, specific insertion or deletion were found relative to the human P [2] genotype, and these motifs are a possible critical factor for host range restriction. Our findings highlight the need for further epidemiological surveillance, preventive strategies, and elucidation of the factors involved in the specific host range restriction of RVC-circulating strains.

The Role of the VP4 Attachment Protein in Rotavirus Host Range Restriction in an In Vivo Suckling Mouse Model.

The basis for rotavirus (RV) host range restriction (HRR) is not fully understood but is likely multigenic. RV genes encoding VP3, VP4, NSP1, NSP2, NSP3, and NSP4 have been associated with HRR in various studies. With the exception of NSP1, little is known about the relative contribution of the other RV genes to HRR. VP4 has been linked to HRR because it functions as the RV cell attachment protein, but its actual role in HRR has not been fully assessed. We generated a collection of recombinant RVs (rRVs) in an isogenic murine-like RV genetic background, harboring either heterologous or homologous VP4 genes from simian, bovine, porcine, human, and murine RV strains, and characterized these rRVs in vitro and in vivo. We found that a murine-like rRV encoding a simian VP4 was shed, spread to uninoculated littermates, and induced diarrhea comparably to rRV harboring a murine VP4. However, rRVs carrying VP4s from both bovine and porcine RVs had reduced diarrhea, but no change in fecal shedding was observed. Both diarrhea and shedding were reduced when VP4 originated from a human RV strain. rRVs harboring VP4s from human or bovine RVs did not transmit to uninoculated littermates. We also generated two rRVs harboring reciprocal chimeric murine or bovine VP4. Both chimeras replicated and caused disease as efficiently as the parental strain with a fully murine VP4. These data suggest that the genetic origin of VP4 partially modulates HRR in the suckling mouse and that both the VP8* and VP5* domains independently contribute to pathogenesis and transmission. IMPORTANCE Human group A rotaviruses (RVs) remain the most important cause of severe acute gastroenteritis among infants and young children worldwide despite the introduction of several safe and effective live attenuated vaccines. The lack of knowledge regarding fundamental aspects of RV biology, such as the genetic basis of host range restriction (HRR), has made it difficult to predictively and efficiently design improved, next-generation live attenuated rotavirus vaccines. Here, we engineered a collection of VP4 monoreassortant RVs to systematically explore the role of VP4 in replication, pathogenicity, and spread, as measures of HRR, in a suckling mouse model. The genetic and mechanistic bases of HRR have substantial clinical relevance given that this restriction forms the basis of attenuation for several replication-competent human RV vaccines. In addition, a better understanding of RV pathogenesis and the determinants of RV spread is likely to enhance our ability to improve antiviral drug and therapy development.

Swine MicroRNAs ssc-miR-221-3p and ssc-miR-222 Restrict the Cross-Species Infection of Avian Influenza Virus.

Avian influenza virus (AIV) can cross species barriers to infect humans and other mammals. However, these species-cross transmissions are most often dead-end infections due to host restriction. Current research about host restriction focuses mainly on the barriers of cell membrane, nuclear envelope, and host proteins; whether microRNAs (miRNAs) play a role in host restriction is largely unknown. In this study, we used porcine alveolar macrophage (PAM) cells as a model to elucidate the role of miRNAs in host range restriction. During AIV infection, 40 dysregulation expressed miRNAs were selected in PAM cells. Among them, two Sus scrofa (ssc; swine) miRNAs, ssc-miR-221-3p and ssc-miR-222, could inhibit the infection and replication of AIV in PAM cells by directly targeting viral genome and inducing cell apoptosis via inhibiting the expression of anti-apoptotic protein HMBOX1. Avian but not swine influenza virus caused upregulated expressions of ssc-miR-221-3p and ssc-miR-222 in PAM cells. We further found that NF-κB P65 was more effectively phosphorylated upon AIV infection and that P65 functioned as a transcription activator to regulate the AIV-induced expression of miR-221-3p/222 Importantly, we found that ssc-miR-221-3p and ssc-miR-222 could also be specifically upregulated upon AIV infection in newborn pig tracheal epithelial (NPTr) cells and also exerted anti-AIV function. In summary, our study indicated that miRNAs act as a host barrier during cross-species infection of influenza A virus.IMPORTANCE The host range of an influenza A virus is determined by species-specific interactions between virus and host cell factors. Host miRNAs can regulate influenza A virus replication; however, the role of miRNAs in host species specificity is unclear. Here, we show that the induced expression of ssc-miR-221-3p and ssc-miR-222 in swine cells is modulated by NF-κB P65 phosphorylation in response to AIV infection but not swine influenza virus infection. ssc-miR-221-3p and ssc-miR-222 exerted antiviral function via targeting viral RNAs and causing apoptosis by inhibiting the expression of HMBOX1 in host cells. These findings uncover miRNAs as a host range restriction factor that limits cross-species infection of influenza A virus.

Host Range Restriction of Insect-Specific Flaviviruses Occurs at Several Levels of the Viral Life Cycle.

The genus Flavivirus contains emerging arthropod-borne viruses (arboviruses) infecting vertebrates, as well as insect-specific viruses (ISVs) (i.e., viruses whose host range is restricted to insects). ISVs are evolutionary precursors to arboviruses. Knowledge of the nature of the ISV infection block in vertebrates could identify functions necessary for the expansion of the host range toward vertebrates. Mapping of host restrictions by complementation of ISV and arbovirus genome functions could generate knowledge critical to predicting arbovirus emergence. Here we isolated a novel flavivirus, termed Niénokoué virus (NIEV), from mosquitoes sampled in Côte d'Ivoire. NIEV groups with insect-specific flaviviruses (ISFs) in phylogeny and grows in insect cells but not in vertebrate cells. We generated an infectious NIEV cDNA clone and a NIEV reporter replicon to study growth restrictions of NIEV in comparison to yellow fever virus (YFV), for which the same tools are available. Efficient RNA replication of the NIEV reporter replicon was observed in insect cells but not in vertebrate cells. Initial translation of the input replicon RNA in vertebrate cells was functional, but RNA replication did not occur. Chimeric YFV carrying the envelope proteins of NIEV was recovered via electroporation in C6/36 insect cells but did not infect vertebrate cells, indicating a block at the level of entry. Since the YF/NIEV chimera readily produced infectious particles in insect cells but not in vertebrate cells despite efficient RNA replication, restriction is also determined at the level of assembly/release. Taking the results together, the ability of ISF to infect vertebrates is blocked at several levels, including attachment/entry and RNA replication as well as assembly/release. IMPORTANCE Most viruses of the genus Flavivirus, e.g., YFV and dengue virus, are mosquito borne and transmitted to vertebrates during blood feeding of mosquitoes. Within the last decade, an increasing number of viruses with a host range exclusively restricted to insects in close relationship to the vertebrate-pathogenic flaviviruses were discovered in mosquitoes. To identify barriers that could block the arboviral vertebrate tropism, we set out to identify the steps at which the ISF replication cycle fails in vertebrates. Our studies revealed blocks at several levels, suggesting that flavivirus host range expansion from insects to vertebrates was a complex process that involved overcoming multiple barriers.

Rotavirus Strategies Against the Innate Antiviral System.

"Rotaviruses represent the most important etiological agents of acute, severe gastroenteritis in the young of many animal species, including humans." This statement, variations of which are a common beginning in articles about rotaviruses, reflects the fact that these viruses have evolved efficient strategies for evading the innate immune response of the host and for successfully replicating in the population. In this review, we summarize what is known about the defense mechanisms that host cells employ to prevent rotavirus invasion and the countermeasures that these viruses have successfully developed to surpass cellular defenses. Rotaviruses use at least two viral multifunctional proteins to directly interact with, and prevent the activation of, the interferon system, and they use at least one other protein to halt the protein synthesis machinery and prevent the expression of most of the transcriptional antiviral program of the cell. Characterization of the confrontation between rotaviruses and their host cells has allowed us to learn about the virus-host coevolution that prevents the damaging effects of the innate immune response.