Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 533
Filter
1.
J Diabetes Res ; 2024: 2527791, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39161705

ABSTRACT

Aim: To estimate the prevalence and factors associated with diabetes among older adults and compare the prevalence rate of a three-round national survey of the Mexican Health and Aging Study (MHAS). Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted with data obtained from MHAS 2015 (n = 8167), 2018 (n = 7854), and 2021 (n = 8060), which comprised a nationally representative sample of older adults in Mexico. The measures included sociodemographic characteristics and health. A binary logistic regression model was used to identify the association between independent variables and self-reported diabetes. Results: The prevalence of diabetes was 26.3%, 27.7%, and 28.1% in 2015, 2018, and 2021, respectively. This prevalence decreased with age and was higher for female, urban older adults, those with multimorbidity, a lower level of education, and without social security coverage for the three years. Age was associated with a lower possibility of presenting diabetes ([OR = 0.79[0.71-0.89]] and [OR = 0.41[0.33-0.52]] in groups aged 75-84 years and ≥85 years, respectively). Females continue to be more likely to present diabetes than males (OR = 1.39 [95% CI 1.25-1.55]). Older adults living in rural areas are 20% less likely to present diabetes than those living in urban areas (OR = 0.80 [95% CI 0.69-0.93]). Uninsured older adults (OR = 1.35 [95% CI 1.20-1.53]), those who wear glasses (OR = 1.23 [95% CI 1.16-1.30]), those with multimorbidity (OR = 1.13 [95% CI 1.01-1.27]), and those who currently drink alcohol (OR = 1.12 [95% CI 1.00-1.25]) were significantly more likely to have diabetes. Conclusion: An elevated prevalence of diabetes was found in older adults in Mexico, while not having access to social security was associated with a higher possibility of presenting diabetes and living in a rural area was associated with a lower possibility of presenting diabetes. Detection, prevention, and control programs should be implemented to reduce the incidence and severity of the disease in older adults and, thus, prevent its associated complications.


Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus , Self Report , Humans , Aged , Female , Male , Mexico/epidemiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Prevalence , Aged, 80 and over , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiology , Risk Factors , Health Surveys , Age Factors , Aging , Middle Aged , Sex Factors
2.
Obes Pillars ; 11: 100120, 2024 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39161945

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Obesity rates continue to rise in the United States. Treatment includes modification of diet, exercise, behavioral modification and medical consideration including anti-obesity medications. However, multiple highly effective anti-obesity medications are expensive and with that we see insurers opting out of coverage of these medications. This has led to patients having to abruptly stop treatment with these medications. The purpose of this study is to explore the impact of non-medical discontinuance of obesity medication among patients in medical weight management programs. Methods: This is a qualitative descriptive study. Semistructured interviews were completed with participants in an academic medical weight management clinic. Interviews were recorded and transcribed. Themes were identified by members of the study team through qualitative content analysis. Participants were on or about to start anti-obesity medications and were from a single insurance company which cut coverage to all anti-obesity medications. Results: Twenty-two insured patients from across the state either currently taking or intending to take anti-obesity medications, participated. All participants were female. Few participants said they could afford the cost of the medication. Four main themes emerged: 1) Feelings of hope replaced by hopelessness upon loss of medication coverage, 2) Anger regarding the perceived injustice of anti-obesity medication coverage termination, 3) Perceptions of past and present stigma within the healthcare system and insurance company, 4) Generational influences on obesity treatment. Conclusion: Patients perceive the discontinuation of anti-obesity medication coverage as stigmatizing and unjust, leading to feelings of hopelessness and fear. With more insurance companies denying coverage for these costly medications more information is needed to identify best ways to address the loss of coverage with patients. Clinical management of these patients should incorporate evidence-based obesity treatments while navigating insurance constraints.

3.
Healthcare (Basel) ; 12(16)2024 Aug 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39201160

ABSTRACT

This study investigated whether differences in survival rates and clinical outcomes exist in patients undergoing TKA by insurance type: National Health Insurance (NHI) vs. Medical Aid Program (MAP). This study conducted a retrospective analysis of 762 TKAs (NHI, n = 505; MAP, n = 257) with a mean follow-up of 8.4 ± 1.8 years. Patient-reported outcomes (PROMs) were evaluated using the American Knee Society's (AKS) score at the final follow-up. The survival rate of each group was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. Any postoperative complications and readmissions within 90 days of discharge were recorded and compared between the groups. There were no between-group differences in pre- to postoperative improvement in AKS scores. The estimated 10-year survival rates were 98.5% in the NHI group and 96.9% in the MAP group, respectively, with no significant differences (p = 0.48). However, the length of hospital stay (LOS) was significantly longer in the MAP group than in the NHI group (13.4 days vs. 13.1 days, p = 0.03), and the transfer rate to other departments was significantly higher in the MAP group than in the NHI group (3.9% vs. 1.4%, p = 0.04). Readmission rates for orthopedic complications for 90 days were 3.0% in the NHI group and 3.5% in the MAP group, respectively (p = 0.67). Patients' insurance type showed similar survival rates and clinical outcomes to those of primary TKA at a mean follow-up of 8.4 years, but the LOS and rate of transfer to other departments during hospitalization were influenced by insurance type.

4.
Drug Alcohol Depend Rep ; 12: 100262, 2024 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39139778

ABSTRACT

Expanding Medicaid plays a large role in ensuring that people across the United States have access to health care services. Although North Carolina recently moved toward Medicaid expansion, the impact of expansion on overdoses and overdose mortality may vary based on the type of treatment (offering medications for opioid use disorder [MOUD] vs. offering inpatient medically managed withdrawal without linkage to further MOUD treatment or non-MOUD-based treatment) accessed by individuals newly eligible for treatment through expansion. Based on official North Carolina statistics and published peer-reviewed literature, we developed a simulation model that forecasts opioid overdose and mortality under different scenarios for type of treatment accessed (MOUD-based vs. non-MOUD-based) and Medicaid coverage levels. An optimistic scenario assuming 70 % of individuals newly eligible for treatment would enter treatment during the first year of expansion estimated that 332 (Simulation Interval: 246-412) overdose deaths would be averted. A scenario more in line with recent historical trends assuming 38 % of individuals newly eligible for treatment would enter treatment resulted in 213 (Simulation Interval: 157-263) averted overdose deaths. In all scenarios, MOUD-based treatment approaches increased the number of lives saved compared with approaches expanding opioid treatment through non-MOUD-based treatment. Our study emphasized the need to ensure access to MOUD-based treatment for individuals newly covered by the Medicaid expansion.

5.
J Neonatal Perinatal Med ; 17(4): 543-553, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39031391

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To examine the association of inpatient maternal mortality with variability in healthcare services delivery such as hospital size, urban/rural designation, teaching/non-teaching status, regional location, and insurance coverage. METHODS: This is a pooled, cross-sectional analysis of the National Inpatient Sample (2012-2014). Information on maternal demographics, clinical conditions, and birth outcomes were identified using respective ICD9-CM codes. Bivariate and multivariate analysis using logistic regression models were used to describe maternal characteristics and to calculate the risk of mortality with each independent variable. RESULTS: The weighted sample included 12,409,939 hospital records (82.6% are 18-34-year-old and 49.5% are Caucasians). Maternal death during hospitalization occurred in 1310 cases (12/100,000 live birth). Women with cardiovascular disorders, hemorrhage or sepsis were 33.6, 4.7, and 5.4 times more likely to suffer inpatient maternal mortality. Compared to small-sized hospitals, delivery at medium or large size hospitals is associated with higher mortality, adjusted odds ratios (aOR) 1.8 (1.4-2.3), and 2.2 (1.8-2.8), respectively. Adjusted OR for inpatient maternal mortality in urban non-teaching or urban teaching compared to rural hospitals were 2.2 (1.7-3.0) and 2.9 (2.2-3.9), respectively. Women in the South have higher maternal mortality compared to Northeast, aOR 1.7 (1.5-2.1). Women coved with public insurance experience higher inpatient maternal mortality compared to those with private insurance, aOR: 2.6 (2.1-3.2) and 1.9 (1.6-2.1), respectively. CONCLUSION: Factors related to variability in healthcare delivery may play a role in inpatient maternal mortality. Some could be explained by the case mix and the clinical conditions affecting birthing outcomes. A qualitative analysis is needed to explore how these factors relate to increased maternal mortality in certain hospital settings.


Subject(s)
Hospital Mortality , Maternal Mortality , Humans , Female , United States/epidemiology , Adult , Pregnancy , Cross-Sectional Studies , Young Adult , Adolescent , Delivery of Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Pregnancy Complications/mortality , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data
6.
Curr Med Res Opin ; 40(9): 1615-1623, 2024 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39034772

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: In the United States (US), prescription drug coverage is subject to prior authorization (PA) criteria, which may vary between health plans and may exceed drug label requirements. This study aimed to characterize profiles and treatment history of patients with treatment-resistant depression (TRD) who initiated esketamine nasal spray, by stringency of their health plans' PA criteria relative to the esketamine label. METHODS: Adults with evidence of TRD (≥2 antidepressant courses of adequate dose and duration) prior to initiating esketamine were identified using US insurance claims data (03/2016-02/2022). Based on health plan PA criteria for esketamine obtained from Managed Markets Insight & Technology data (05/2020-02/2022), patients were grouped into stringent (PA criteria exceeds label) and non-stringent (PA criteria less stringent or equal to label) cohorts. Patient treatment history before esketamine initiation was compared using Wilcoxon rank sum and Fisher's exact tests. RESULTS: The stringent cohort included 168 patients (mean age: 45 years, 63% female) and the non-stringent cohort included 400 patients (mean age: 45 years, 70% female). During the ongoing major depressive episode before esketamine initiation, the stringent versus non-stringent cohort completed 3.9 versus 3.8 antidepressant treatment courses, on average (p = 0.217); 94.6% versus 96.8% used augmentation therapy (p = 0.240), including 59.3% versus 58.1% with an antipsychotic (p = 0.844), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Regardless of health plan stringency, on average, patients exceeded US label-mandated number of antidepressant trials before esketamine initiation, which questions the need for health insurance plans PA criteria above label.


Subject(s)
Antidepressive Agents , Depressive Disorder, Treatment-Resistant , Ketamine , Nasal Sprays , Humans , Ketamine/administration & dosage , Ketamine/therapeutic use , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Depressive Disorder, Treatment-Resistant/drug therapy , Adult , United States , Antidepressive Agents/administration & dosage , Antidepressive Agents/therapeutic use , Insurance, Health , Drug Approval
7.
Int J Equity Health ; 23(1): 126, 2024 Jun 21.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38907297

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: South Korea's National Health Insurance (NHI) system pursues universal health coverage, but it has not been able to alleviate patients' financial burden owing to limited coverage and a high proportion of out-of-pocket expenses. In 2017, the government announced a plan to strengthen universality by providing coverage for all unincluded services, expanding coverage, and alleviating household financial burden. We aimed to evaluate the effect of "Moon Care" with a focus on changes in health expenditures following policy implementation, and to provide empirical evidence for future policies to strengthen the NHI system's universality. METHODS: Using data from the 2016 and 2018 Korea Health Panel (KHP), we established a treatment group affected by the policy and an unaffected control group; we ensured homogeneity between the groups using propensity score matching (PSM). Subsequently, we examined changes in NHI payments, non-payments, and out-of-pocket payments (OOP); we performed difference-in-differences (DID) analysis to evaluate the policy's effect. RESULTS: Following policy implementation, the control group had a higher increase than the treatment group in all categories of health expenditures, including NHI payments, non-payments, and OOP. We noted significant decreases in all three categories of health expenditures when comparing the differences before and after policy implementation, as well as between the treatment and control groups. However, we witnessed a significant decrease in the interaction term, which confirms the policy's effect, but only for non-payments. CONCLUSIONS: We observed the policy's intervention effect over time as a decrease in non-payments, on the effectivity of remunerating covered medical services. However, the policy did not work for NHI payments and OOP, suggesting that it failed to control the creation of new non-covered services as noncovered services were converted into covered ones. Thus, it is crucial to discuss the financial spending of health insurance regarding the inclusion of non-covered services in the NHI benefits package.


Subject(s)
Health Expenditures , Humans , Republic of Korea , Health Expenditures/statistics & numerical data , National Health Programs/economics , Health Policy , Female , Universal Health Insurance/economics , Male , Insurance Coverage/economics , Middle Aged , Insurance, Health/economics , Adult
8.
Health Aff Sch ; 2(1): qxad083, 2024 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38756397

ABSTRACT

Having health insurance coverage is a strong determinant of cancer care access and survival in the United States. The expansion of Medicaid income eligibility under the Affordable Care Act has increased insurance coverage for working-age adults. Using data from the Cancer Incidence in North America (CiNA) in 2010-2019, we identified 6 432 117 incident cancer cases with known insurance status diagnosed at age 18-64 years from population-based registries of 49 states. Considerable variation in Medicaid coverage and uninsured rate exists across states, especially by Medicaid expansion status. Among expansion states, Medicaid coverage increased from 14.1% in 2010 to 19.9% in 2019, while the Medicaid coverage rate remained lower (range = 11.7% - 12.7%) in non-expansion states. The uninsured rate decreased from 4.9% to 2.1% in expansion states, while in non-expansion states, the uninsured rate decreased slightly from 9.5% to 8.1%. In 2019, 111 393 cancer cases (16.9%) had Medicaid coverage at diagnosis (range = 7.6%-37.9% across states), and 48 357 (4.4%) were uninsured (range = 0.5%-13.2%). These estimates suggest that many patients with cancer may face challenges with care access and continuity, especially following the unwinding of COVID-19 pandemic protections for Medicaid coverage. State cancer prevention and control efforts are needed to mitigate cancer care disparities among vulnerable populations.

9.
Cancers (Basel) ; 16(10)2024 May 14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38791944

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: This study aims to evaluate the impact of South Korea's national insurance coverage (NIC) expansion and the addition of genetic counselors on BRCA1/2 mutation testing rates in breast cancer patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted at the Samsung Medical Center (SMC), dividing patients into three groups: pre-NIC expansion, post-NIC expansion, and post-extra genetic counselor involvement. The number of BRCA1/2 tests performed and the detection rates among newly diagnosed and follow-up patients, particularly focusing on triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) cases, were analyzed. RESULTS: Post-NIC expansion, there was a significant increase in BRCA1/2 testing rates, with a gradual rise in detection rates while maintaining statistical significance. TNBC patients under 60 experienced substantial increases in testing rates. The number of follow-up patients recalled for testing also rose significantly after the extra genetic counselor involvement. Additionally, NIC expansion increased insurance coverage for TNBC patients, enhancing accessibility to testing. CONCLUSION: The study highlights the positive impact of NIC expansion and genetic counselor involvement on BRCA1/2 mutation testing rates and subsequent patient management. Addressing financial barriers to testing and incorporating genetic counseling significantly improve patient outcomes. This model provides a potential strategy for enhancing early detection and personalized treatment for breast cancer patients with BRCA1/2 mutations, contributing to global cancer management efforts.

10.
Soc Sci Med ; 351: 116994, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38788429

ABSTRACT

The United States offers two markedly different subsidy structures for private health insurance. When covered through employer-based plans, employees and their dependents benefit from the exclusion from taxable income of the premiums. Individuals without access to employer coverage may obtain subsidies for Marketplace coverage. This paper seeks to understand how the public subsidies embedded in the privately financed portion of the U.S. healthcare system impact the payments families are required to make under both ESI and Marketplace coverage, and the implications for finance equity. Using the Household Component of the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS-HC) and Marketplace premium data, we assess horizontal and vertical equity by calculating public subsidies for and expected family spending under each coverage source and using Lorenz curves and Gini and concentration coefficients. Our study pooled the 2018 and 2019 MEPS-HC to achieve a sample size of 10,593 observations. Our simulations showed a marked horizontal inequity for lower-income families with access to employer coverage who cannot obtain Marketplace subsidies. Relative to both the financing of employer coverage and earlier Marketplace tax credits, the more generous Marketplace premium subsidies, first made available in 2021 under the American Rescue Plan Act, substantially increased the vertical equity of Marketplace financing. While Marketplace subsidies have clearly improved equity within the United States, we conclude with a comparison to other OECD countries highlighting the persistence of inequities in the U.S. stemming from its noteworthy reliance on employer-based private health insurance.


Subject(s)
Insurance, Health , Humans , United States , Insurance, Health/economics , Insurance, Health/statistics & numerical data , Financing, Government/statistics & numerical data , Financing, Government/economics , Insurance Coverage/statistics & numerical data , Insurance Coverage/economics , Health Insurance Exchanges/economics , Health Insurance Exchanges/statistics & numerical data , Private Sector/economics , Private Sector/statistics & numerical data , Health Benefit Plans, Employee/economics , Health Benefit Plans, Employee/statistics & numerical data
12.
ESMO Open ; 9(5): 102992, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38626634

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Financial toxicity, defined as both the objective financial burden and subjective financial distress from a cancer diagnosis and its treatment, is a topic of interest in the assessment of the quality of life of patients with cancer and their families. Current evidence implicates financial toxicity in psychosocial, economic and other harms, leading to suboptimal cancer outcomes along the entire trajectory of diagnosis, treatment, supportive care, survivorship and palliation. This paper presents the results of a virtual consensus, based on the evidence base to date, on the screening and management of financial toxicity in patients with and beyond cancer organized by the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) in 2022. METHODS: A Delphi panel of 19 experts from 11 countries was convened taking into account multidisciplinarity, diversity in health system contexts and research relevance. The international panel of experts was divided into four working groups (WGs) to address questions relating to distinct thematic areas: patients with cancer at risk of financial toxicity; management of financial toxicity during the initial phase of treatment at the hospital/ambulatory settings; financial toxicity during the continuing phase and at end of life; and financial risk protection for survivors of cancer, and in cancer recurrence. After comprehensively reviewing the literature, statements were developed by the WGs and then presented to the entire panel for further discussion and amendment, and voting. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: A total of 25 evidence-informed consensus statements were developed, which answer 13 questions on financial toxicity. They cover evidence summaries, practice recommendations/guiding statements and policy recommendations relevant across health systems. These consensus statements aim to provide a more comprehensive understanding of financial toxicity and guide clinicians globally in mitigating its impact, emphasizing the importance of further research, best practices and guidelines.


Subject(s)
Neoplasms , Humans , Neoplasms/therapy , Neoplasms/economics , Consensus , Quality of Life , Cost of Illness , Medical Oncology/economics , Medical Oncology/standards , Societies, Medical , Delphi Technique
13.
J Cancer Surviv ; 2024 Mar 23.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38520599

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Older cancer survivors have substantial needs for ongoing care, but they may encounter difficulties accessing care due to cost concerns. We examined whether near-universal insurance coverage through Medicare-a key source of health insurance coverage in this population-is associated with improvements in care access and affordability among older cancer survivors around age 65. METHODS: In a nationally representative sample of cancer survivors (aged 50-80) from 2006-2018 National Health Interview Survey, we employed a quasi-experimental, regression discontinuity design to estimate changes in insurance coverage, delayed/skipped care due to cost, and worries about or problems paying medical bills at age 65. RESULTS: Medicare coverage sharply increased from 8.3% at age 64 to 98.2% at age 65, ensuring near-universal insurance coverage (99.5%). Medicare eligibility at age 65 was associated with reductions in delayed/skipped care due to cost (discontinuity, - 5.7 percentage points or pp; 95% CI, - 8.1, - 3.3; P < .001), worries about paying for medical bills (- 7.7 pp; 95% CI, - 12.0, - 3.2; P = .001), and problems paying medical bills (- 3.2 pp; 95% CI, - 6.1, - 0.2; P = .036). However, a sizable proportion reported any access or affordability problems (29.7%) between ages 66 and 80. CONCLUSIONS: Near-universal Medicare coverage at age 65 was associated with a reduction-but not elimination-of access and affordability problems among cancer survivors. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: These findings reaffirm the role of Medicare in improving access and affordability for older cancer survivor and highlight opportunities for reforms to further alleviate financial burden of care in this population.

14.
Sci Rep ; 14(1): 6711, 2024 03 20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38509152

ABSTRACT

Fibrinogen concentrate (FC) for acquired hypofibrinogenemia associated with critical obstetrical hemorrhage (COH) was covered by public medical insurance in September 2021 in Japan. We aimed to investigate changes in the policy of FC use and its effect on COH after insurance coverage. A primary survey covering September 2020 to August 2021 and a secondary survey covering September 2021 to August 2022 were conducted at 428 higher-level medical facilities. We investigated the policy of FC use in transfusion strategy and the maternal outcomes in COH. Among the hospitals that responded to both surveys, the number of facilities that use FC increased from 51.5 (101/196) to 78.6% (154/196) (P < 0.0001). The number of COH cases treated using FC increased from 14.3 to 24.3% (P < 0.0001) and that transfused with ≥ 10 units of red blood cells (RBCs) decreased from 36.8 to 29.8% (P = 0.001). The incidence of pulmonary edema reduced by 3.7-2.0% (P = 0.021), and transfusion-induced allergy by 1.9-0.7% (P = 0.008). No changes were observed in the incidence of thromboembolism, arterial embolization, or hysterectomy. The increased use of FC after insurance coverage led to changes in the transfusion strategy, which may be associated with decreases in transfusions of RBCs, pulmonary edema, and transfusion-induced allergies.


Subject(s)
Hemostatics , Pulmonary Edema , Female , Humans , Fibrinogen/therapeutic use , Japan/epidemiology , Hemorrhage/therapy , Surveys and Questionnaires
15.
Oncologist ; 29(6): 527-533, 2024 Jun 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38484395

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Because the markups on cancer drugs vary by payor, providers' financial incentive to use high-price drugs is differential according to each patient's insurance type. We evaluated the association between patient insurer (commercial vs Medicaid) and the use of high-priced cancer treatments. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We linked cancer registry, administrative claims, and demographic data for individuals diagnosed with cancer in North Carolina from 2004 to 2011, with either commercial or Medicaid insurance. We selected cancers with multiple FDA-approved, guideline-recommended chemotherapy options and large price differences between treatment options: advanced colorectal, lung, and head and neck cancer. The outcome was a receipt of a higher-priced option, and the exposure was insurer: commercial versus Medicaid. We estimated risk ratios (RRs) for the association between insurer and higher-priced treatment using log-binomial models with inverse probability of exposure weights. RESULTS: Of 812 patients, 209 (26%) had Medicaid. The unadjusted risk of receiving higher-priced treatment was 36% (215/603) for commercially insured and 27% (57/209) for Medicaid insured (RR: 1.31, 95% CI: 1.02-1.67). After adjustment for confounders the association was attenuated (RR: 1.15, 95% CI: 0.81-1.65). Exploratory subgroup analysis suggested that commercial insurance was associated with increased receipt of higher-priced treatment among patients treated by non-NCI-designated providers (RR: 1.53, 95% CI: 1.14-2.04). CONCLUSIONS: Individuals with Medicaid and commercial insurance received high-priced treatments in similar proportion, after accounting for differences in case mix. However, modification by provider characteristics suggests that insurance type may influence treatment selection for some patient groups. Further work is needed to determine the relationship between insurance status and newer, high-price drugs such as immune-oncology agents.


Subject(s)
Medicaid , Humans , Medicaid/statistics & numerical data , United States , Female , Male , Middle Aged , Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Agents/economics , Neoplasms/drug therapy , North Carolina , Aged , Insurance, Health/statistics & numerical data , Adult
16.
Sci Rep ; 14(1): 4139, 2024 02 20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38374130

ABSTRACT

Biologics for psoriasis are efficient and safe, but very expensive. We investigated the association of the reducing copayment program (RCP) with changes in biologics use patterns depending on the income levels of patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis. This nationwide cohort study included patients identified as having moderate-to-severe psoriasis between 2014 and 2020. Logistic regression models were used to estimate the odds ratio for the use of biologics according to income levels. Among 57,139 patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis, 3464 (6.1%) used biologics for psoriasis from 2014 to 2020. After the introduction of RCP in 2017, the proportion of patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis using biologics rapidly increased from 5.0% in 2016 to 19.2% in 2020; the increase was more remarkable in patients with the lowest or mid-low income compared to those with Medical Aid. Drug survival of biologics was higher in patients with the highest income before the RCP, but became comparable between those with high and low incomes after RCP introduction. The introduction of RCP was associated with an increased use of biologics in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis of all income levels; however, the effect was more pronounced in low-income patients. The RCP may contribute to alleviating the disparity in access to biologics.


Subject(s)
Biological Products , Psoriasis , Humans , Biological Products/therapeutic use , Cohort Studies , Psoriasis/drug therapy , Biological Factors , Poverty
17.
Afr J Prim Health Care Fam Med ; 16(1): e1-e6, 2024 Jan 21.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38299542

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Nigeria has the highest maternal mortality rate among sub-Saharan African countries. Recently, universal health insurance coverage has been embraced as a means to enhance population health in low- and middle-income countries. Hitherto, the effect of health insurance coverage on the utilisation of facility-level delivery is largely unknown in the face of the earnest need to lower maternal mortality rates in developing countries. AIM: To empirically investigate the association of health insurance coverage on health services utilisation of facility-level delivery and the extent to which public- and private-sector facility delivery in Nigeria had a disproportionate associational effect with health insurance coverage, in the universal health coverage era. SETTING: A cross-sectional study conducted for Nigeria. METHODS: This study employed a quasi-experimental method using propensity scores along with different matching methods that were applied to the most recent wave of Nigeria's Demographic and Health Survey (2020) data. RESULTS: Evidence suggests that childbearing mothers from insured households had an average of 25% probability of utilising facility-level delivery relative to mothers from uninsured households in the year that preceded the survey. Moreover, private-sector facility delivery had a 31% higher associational effect with health insurance coverage than public-sector facility delivery, which had an estimated probability of 21%. CONCLUSION: Expansion of health insurance coverage in Nigeria will be a desirable way to stimulate the utilisation of facility-level delivery by women of childbearing age. Consequently, coverage expansion has the potential to save many maternal and newborn lives in Nigeria.Contribution: This study has contributed to the urgent attention of the federal government of Nigeria to monitor and revamp the health insurance coverage policies of the country for better facilitation of health services to the Nigerian population.


Subject(s)
Health Services , Maternal Health Services , Infant, Newborn , Humans , Female , Pregnancy , Nigeria , Cross-Sectional Studies , Universal Health Insurance , Patient Acceptance of Health Care , Insurance, Health
18.
J Cancer Surviv ; 2024 Feb 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38340250

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Describe material financial hardship (e.g., using savings, credit card debt), insurance, and access to care experienced by Utah cancer survivors; investigate urban-rural differences in financial hardship. METHODS: Cancer survivors were surveyed from 2018 to 2021 about their experiences with financial hardship, access to healthcare, and job lock (insurance preventing employment changes). Weighed percentage responses, univariable and multivariable logistic regression models for these outcomes compared differences in survivors living in rural and urban areas based on Rural-Urban Commuting Area Codes. RESULTS: The N = 1793 participants were predominantly Non-Hispanic White, female, and 65 or older at time of survey. More urban than rural survivors had a college degree (39.8% vs. 31.0%, p = 0.04). Overall, 35% of survivors experienced ≥ 1 financial hardship. In adjusted analyses, no differences were observed between urban and rural survivors for: material financial hardship, the overall amount of hardship reported, insurance status at survey, access to healthcare, or job lock. Hispanic rural survivors were less likely to report financial hardship than Hispanic urban survivors (odds ratio (OR) = 0.24, 95%CI = 0.08-0.73)). Rural survivors who received chemo/immune therapy as their only treatment were more likely to report at least one instance of financial hardship than urban survivors (OR = 2.72, 95%CI = 1.08-6.86). CONCLUSIONS: The relationship between rurality and financial hardship among survivors may be most burdensome for patients whose treatments require travel or specialty medication access. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: The impact of living rurally on financial difficulties after cancer diagnoses is complex. Features of rurality that may alter financial difficulty after a cancer diagnosis may vary geographically and instead of considering rurality as a stand-alone factor, these features should be investigated independently.

19.
BMC Public Health ; 24(1): 229, 2024 01 19.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38243212

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Health insurance has been documented as one of the primary methods of financing healthcare for Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) by 2030. Yet, there is a dearth of evidence on the determinants of health insurance coverage among women in Mauritania. We examine the factors associated with health insurance coverage among women in Mauritania using a nationally representative survey dataset. METHODS: We analyzed secondary data from the 2019-2021 Mauritania Demographic and Health Survey. A weighted sample of 15,714 women of reproductive age (15-49 years) was included in the study. Multilevel regression analysis was used to examined the factors associated with health insurance coverage. The results were presented using an adjusted odds ratio (aOR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI). RESULTS: The coverage of health insurance among women was 8.7%. The majority of the women subscribed to social security health insurance (7.6%). Women aged 35 years and above [aOR = 1.54; 95% CI = 1.24, 1.92] were more likely to be covered by health insurance relative to those aged 15-24. The likelihood of being covered by health insurance increased with increasing level of education with the highest odds among women with higher education [aOR = 6.09; 95% CI = 3.93, 9.42]. Women in the richest wealth index households [aOR = 22.12; 95% CI = 9.52, 51.41] and those with grand parity [aOR = 2.16; 95% CI = 1.62, 2.87] had the highest odds of being covered by health insurance. Women who were working, those who watched television, and those who used the internet were more likely to be covered by health insurance relative to their counterparts who were not working, those who did not watch television, and those who did not use the internet. Women residing in Tiris zemour et Inchiri [aOR = 3.60; 95%CI = 1.60, 8.10], Tagant (aOR = 3.74; 95% CI = 1.61, 8.68], and Adrar [aOR = 2.76; 95% CI = 1.36, 5.61] regions were more likely to be covered by health insurance compared with those from Hodh Echargui. CONCLUSION: Health insurance coverage among the women in our study was low. Achieving the SDG targets of ensuring universal health coverage and lowering maternal mortality to less than 70 deaths per 100,000 live births requires the implementation of interventions to increase health insurance coverage, taking into consideration the identified factors in the study. We recommend effective public education and awareness creation on the importance of being covered by health insurance by leveraging television and internet platforms. Also, interventions to increase health insurance coverage should consider younger women and those in rural areas.


Subject(s)
Insurance Coverage , Reproduction , Female , Humans , Pregnancy , Health Surveys , Mauritania/epidemiology , Multilevel Analysis , Adult
20.
Nurs Womens Health ; 28(1): 23-29, 2024 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38206238

ABSTRACT

In this commentary, we present an overview of the accelerating trend toward community-based models for pregnancy care. Doula services, as part of community care programs, are the major target for new coverage changes. Obstetric professionals who include community care providers in their treatment plans can benefit from these local resources in the prenatal, birthing, and postpartum stages of patient management. Including community care programs may help achieve goals of improving health outcomes and health equity.


Subject(s)
Doulas , Health Equity , Pregnancy , Female , Humans , Maternal Health , Prenatal Care , Postpartum Period
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL