From Diagnosis to Delivery: Navigating Pregnancy With an Isthmocele.

Isthmocele is a myometrial defect in the uterine isthmus, often resulting from previous caesarean sections. With rising cesarean rates globally, including a significant increase in India, the prevalence of isthmocele has become a noteworthy clinical concern. Isthmocele can lead to symptoms such as abnormal uterine bleeding, dysmenorrhea, and secondary infertility, often detected through transvaginal ultrasound or MRI. Additionally, it can lead to caesarean scar pregnancy, a serious complication. The condition necessitates treatment, particularly in symptomatic cases or those planning future pregnancies. Early diagnosis and appropriate management are crucial for preventing complications and ensuring positive pregnancy outcomes. Here, we report a case that underscores the potential for successful pregnancy outcomes despite the presence of isthmocele, highlighting the need for tailored management strategies in such high-risk cases.

Factors Associated to the Presence of Isthmocele Diagnosed by Pelvic Ultrasound, Magnetic Resonance Imaging or Diagnostic Hysteroscopy: A Cross-Sectional Study.

We aimed to analyze the prevalence of isthmocele and factors associated with its onset within a cohort of women with previous history of cesarean section. A cross-sectional study with 90 women assessed from 2020 to 2022. Isthmocele was a composite variable diagnosed by transvaginal ultrasound (TVUS), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and/or diagnostic hysteroscopy (DxHys) and were asked about clinical symptoms, sociodemographic and obstetrical history and quality of life by the WHO-QOL questionnaire. Univariate and multivariate analysis (odds ratio (OR) plus 95% confidence intervals-CI) were performed to seek factors associated with the presence of isthmocele (5% significance level).The prevalence of isthmocele after combining MRI, TVUS and DxHys was 63.3% (n = 57). Women with isthmocele presented a higher body mass index (BMI) measured during delivery (32.70 ± 6.07 vs. 28.28 ± 9.86 kg/m2;p < 0.05) than women without isthmocele. Other sociodemographic variables, obstetrical history and WHO-QOL subdomains did not differ between groups. Within women with isthmocele, the residual myometrial mantle had an average of 4.97 ± 1.57 cm. Uterine volume was higher in the isthmocele group (103.95 vs. 81.34 cm3; p = 0.08), but with no statistical difference. Multivariate analysis (logistic regression) has reported that the factors associated with isthmocele were: higher BMI during delivery (aOR = 1.26[1.07-1.49];p < 0.05); longer interpartum interval (aOR = 1.22[1.03-1.46];p = 0.02) and presence of more than two cesarean sections (aOR = 2.16[1.16-4.01];p = 0.02). We concluded that a high prevalence of isthmocele was found. Women with previous cesarean section, with higher BMI during delivery and longer interdelivery interval were risk factors for the presence of isthmocele.

Contrast Hysterosonographic Evaluation of Niche Prevalence Following a Standardized Suturing Technique for Caesarean Sections.

Introduction: After caesarean section a uterine niche can be detected in 42-84% of all women and in 11-45% large defects with a residual myometrium < 2.2 mm occur. If the niche compromises > 50% of myometrial thickness, risk of uterine rupture during birth increases. The suturing technique might contribute substantially on pathogenesis of niches. The objective of this study is to investigate the effect of the suturing technique on niche prevalence by using a standardized two-layer surgical technique. Methods: Women with one previous caesarean section were examined within 6-23 months after caesarean section using contrast medium-supported transvaginal sonography regarding the prevalence, sonomorphological aspect and clinical symptoms of a uterine niche. The surgical technique used was: dilatation of the cervix, interrupted suture of the first layer (excluding the endometrium), continuous closure of the visceral and parietal peritoneum. Results: Using native vaginal sonography, no niches were visible in the whole cohort. In three cases, there was a small niche detectable with a depth between 2.3 and 3.9 mm by contrast hysterosonography. Regarding the total myometrial thickness, the niche depth compromised less than 50%. All patients were symptom-free. Conclusion: In our study population, there were only three cases (9.1%) with a small uterine niche. Residual myometrium and niche percentage on myometrial thickness were excellent in all three cases. Thus, our results show that the uterotomy closure technique used in the study cohort might be superior with respect to the development of uterine niches compared with the expected prevalence.

Exploring uterine contractility frequency in infertile population: A comparative study among different control groups with and without a C-section defect.

OBJECTIVE: Women undergoing IVF who have had a previous c-section (CS) have a lower live birth rate than those with a previous vaginal delivery. However, the precise underlying mechanisms need clarification. Does a previous CS affect the pattern of uterine contractility?. METHODS: Prospective evaluation in patients undergoing frozen blastocyst embryo transfer in medicated endometrial preparation cycles. Twenty patients were included in groups: A/nulliparous. B/previous vaginal delivery. C/ previous CS without a niche, whereas fifteen patients were recruited in group D (CS and a niche). Patients employed estradiol compounds and 800 mg vaginal progesterone. A 3D-scan was performed the transfer-day where uterine contractility/minute was recorded. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics (age, BMI, smoking, endometrial thickness) were similar. Mean frequency of uterine contractions/minute was similar between groups (1.15, 1.01, 0.92, and 1.21 for groups A, B, C, and D, respectively). There was a slight increase in the number of contractions in patients with a sonographic niche versus controls, not reaching statistical significance (p=0.48). No differences were observed when comparing patients with a previous C-section (regardless of the presence of a niche) to those without a C-section, either nulliparous (p=0.78) or with a previous vaginal delivery (p=0.80). The frequency of uterine contractions was similar between patients who achieved a clinical pregnancy and those who did not (1.19 vs. 1.02 UC/min, p=0.219, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Our study found no significant difference in the frequency of uterine contractility between patients with or without a previous C-section or sonographic diagnosed niche. Further investigation is necessary to understand the physiological mechanisms affecting implantation in patients with isthmocele.

A common problem between gynecology, obstetrics, and reproductive medicine: Cesarean section scar defect.

Approximately 60% of patients undergoing Cesarean sections may develop Cesarean Scar Defect (CSD), presenting a significant clinical challenge amidst the increasing Cesarean section rates. This condition, marked by a notch in the anterior uterine wall, has evolved as a notable topic in gynecological research. The multifactorial origins of CSD can be broadly classified into labor-related factors, patients' physical conditions, and surgical quality. However, conflicting influences of certain factors across studies make it challenging to determine effective preventive strategies. Additionally, CSD manifests with diverse symptoms, such as abnormal uterine bleeding, dysmenorrhea, chronic pelvic pain, dyspareunia, secondary infertility, and Cesarean scar pregnancy. Some symptoms are often attributed to other diagnoses, leading to delayed treatment. The quandary of when and how to manage CSD also adds to the complexity. Despite the development of various therapies, clear indications and optimal methods for specific conditions remain elusive. This longstanding challenge has troubled clinicians in both identifying and addressing this iatrogenic disease. Recent studies have yielded some compelling consensuses on various aspects of CSD. This review aims to consolidate the current literature on every facet of CSD. We hope to raise awareness among clinicians about this clinical problem, encouraging more relevant research to unveil the complete picture of CSD.

A prospective study on risk factors associated with the development of isthmocele after caesarean section.

OBJECTIVES: The primary objective was to detect the number of women developing isthmocele following lower segment caesarean section. The secondary objectives included analysing the risk factors associated with developing isthmocele and measuring the agreement between Transvaginal Ultrasonography (TVS) and Saline infusion Sonohysterography (SIS) in diagnosing Isthmocele. METHODS: This study was conducted in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and focused on women who had undergone Lower Segment cesarean Section (LSCS). The study aimed to detect any indentation of at least 2 mm in the scar site, known as isthmocele, using Transvaginal Ultrasound (TVS) and Saline Infusion Sonography (SIS) between 6 weeks and 6 months after delivery. Along with the primary objective, the study also evaluated several secondary outcomes such as maternal comorbidities, closure techniques, and labor details. The evaluation of isthmocele followed the 2019 modified Delphi consensus approach. RESULTS: In our study, we found that 30% of our study population had isthmocele. We also observed that the number of previous caesarean deliveries, maternal BMI, duration of surgery, and characteristics of the previous CD scar were significantly associated with the development of isthmocele. When we compared the diagnostic methods, we found that TVS and SIS had similar limits of agreement for clinically important isthmocele parameters. However, we noticed a difference in the length and distance of isthmocele from the internal os, which we observed through Bland Altman plots. CONCLUSION: Our research has shown that women who have undergone multiple caesarean deliveries, have a higher maternal body mass index (BMI), and experienced longer surgery duration are at a significantly higher risk of developing isthmocele. To prevent its development, it is recommended to promote vaginal birth after caesarean delivery whenever feasible, manage maternal obesity early on, and provide adequate surgical training to medical professionals. Additionally, transvaginal ultrasound (TVS) is an effective method for detecting isthmocele and can be used interchangeably with saline-infused sonography (SIS).

The Novel Parallel Closure Technique Compared to Single-Layer Closure of the Uterus After Primary Cesarean Section Decreases the Incidence of Isthmocele Formation and Increases Residual Myometrial Thickness.

Background Isthmocele or a scar defect is a relatively common consequence of cesarean section resulting in menstrual disturbances and infertility and may compromise the myometrial integrity of the uterus in women contemplating subsequent vaginal birth. Several preventive measures have been suggested, including the modification of surgical techniques used for the closure of the uterine incision. The current study aimed to compare the incidence of isthmocele and assess residual myometrial thickness in women who underwent single versus parallel layered closure to approximate the endo-myometrial layer during cesarean section. Methodology This retrospective study evaluated data of women undergoing their first cesarean section under elective conditions (n = 497) where the uterine incision was closed using a single (n = 295) or a parallel layer (n = 202) technique. Patients were evaluated twice, at 3-6 months and 18 months postpartum, with a transvaginal ultrasound noting the presence or absence of an isthmocele and measurement of the residual myometrial thickness. Results Regardless of the closure technique, 64 (12.9%) women had an ultrasound-diagnosed isthmocele. Significantly fewer patients in the parallel-layer closure group presented with an isthmocele both at 3-6 (13.6 vs. 6.9%; p = 0.019) and 18 months (16.3 vs. 7.8%; p = 0.009) postpartum. Residual myometrium was significantly thicker in the parallel-layer closure group (8.0 vs. 13.2 mm at 3-6 months postpartum; p = 0.000 and 7.2 vs. 12.3 mm at 18 months postpartum; p = 0.004). For all patients, a retroverted position of the uterus at 3-6 months follow-up examination significantly increased the frequency of isthmocele (36/395 (9.1%) with an anteverted uterus and 18/102 (17.6%) with a retroverted uterus; p = 0.002). In patients with a single-layer closure, a retroverted uterus at the 3-6-month follow-up was associated with an isthmocele in 29.5% (18/61) of patients, while no isthmocele was recorded when the uterus was retroverted in the parallel-layer closure group (0/41) (p = 0.001). At 18 months postpartum, of the 64 patients with an isthmocele, 26 (40.6%) presented with abnormal uterine bleeding mainly in the form of postmenstrual spotting. Of the 26 patients with abnormal bleeding, 23 were in the single-layer and three were in the parallel-layer closure group. Conclusions The parallel-layer closure when compared to a single-layer closure of the uterine incision in patients undergoing primary cesarean section decreased the incidence of isthmocele formation and increased residual myometrial thickness. More patients in the single-layer closure group had menstrual cycle disturbances at 18 months postpartum.

Investigating the risk factors for isthmocele development after cesarean delivery.

BACKGROUND: Cesarean delivery rates are increasing globally, raising concerns about associated complications such as isthmocele. Isthmoceles are pouch-like defects in the anterior uterine wall at the site of a prior cesarean delivery scar. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine isthmocele prevalence, associated symptoms, and risk factors among women with a history of cesarean delivery. STUDY DESIGN: This cross-sectional study evaluated 297 women with prior cesarean delivery using transvaginal ultrasound to screen for isthmocele. Data on demographics, pregnancy details, comorbidities, and indications for cesarean delivery were collected. Isthmocele was defined sonographically as any niche or defect at the hysterotomy site. Descriptive and comparative analyses identified factors associated with isthmocele. RESULTS: Isthmocele prevalence was 65.3% (n=194). Abnormal vaginal bleeding was reported in 21.1% of participants, pelvic pain by 4.1% of participants, and both by 4.1% of participants. Compared to women without isthmocele, those with isthmocele were older (35.9 vs 31.6 years), had higher body mass index (26.8 vs 25.5 kg/m2), gravidity (1.8 vs 1.3), and parity (1.7 vs 1.2). Repeat cesarean delivery was more common (30.4% vs 12.6%) and elective cesarean delivery less common (33.5% vs 67.9%) among those with isthmocele. CONCLUSION: Over half of the women with history of cesarean delivery had an isthmocele. Abnormal bleeding was common. Advanced maternal age, obesity, repeat procedures, and certain comorbidities appear to increase risk. Further research on prevention and treatment is warranted given the high prevalence.

Isthmocele and Infertility.

Isthmocele is a gynecological condition characterized by a disruption in the uterine scar, often associated with prior cesarean sections. This anatomical anomaly can be attributed to inadequate or insufficient healing of the uterine wall following a cesarean incision. It appears that isthmocele may impact a woman's quality of life as well as her reproductive capacity. The incidence of isthmocele can range from 20% to 70% in women who have undergone a cesarean section. This review aims to sum up the current knowledge about the effect of isthmocele on fertility and the possible therapeutic strategies to achieve pregnancy. However, currently, there is not sufficiently robust evidence to indicate the need for surgical correction in all asymptomatic patients seeking fertility. In cases where surgical correction of isthmocele is deemed necessary, it is advisable to evaluate residual myometrial thickness (RMT). For patients with RMT >2.5-3 mm, hysteroscopy appears to be the technique of choice. In cases where the residual tissue is lower, recourse to laparotomic, laparoscopic, or vaginal approaches is warranted.

Reproductive outcomes after vaginal repair of isthmocele: A preliminary study and systematic review of the literature.

OBJECTIVE: Although vaginal repair of isthmocele is an effective and safe surgical option, data on reproductive and obstetrical outcomes are lacking. The aim of this study is to evaluate reproductive outcomes of women undergone vaginal repair of isthmocele. We also systematically reviewed the existent literature to offer a general view of available data. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of a database prospectively collected between January 2018 and January 2022 at San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy. We included secondary infertile women with ultrasound documented isthmocele who undergone vaginal repair. Post-surgical clinical, reproductive and obstetric outcomes were recorded. An advanced systematic search of the literature up to January 2023 was conducted. RESULTS: 17 women were included. The mean age of the included patients was 37.2 ± 2.7 years. The median of previous caesarian sections was 1 (1-2). One intra-operative complication (5.9 %) was reported (bladder injury, repaired at the time of surgery). At follow up, bleeding was successfully treated in 8 women (8/10; 80 %). Pregnancy was obtained in 7 women (7/17; 41.2 %): the conception was spontaneous in 4 women (4/7; 57.1 %) and trough assisted reproductive technology in 3 patients (3/7; 42.9 %). The mean time from surgery to pregnancy was 10.8 (±6.7) months. One spontaneous abortion was reported (1/7; 14.3 %), while live birth was achieved in 6 pregnancies (6/7; 85.7 %). All deliveries were by caesarian section at a median gestational age of 37.5 (36-38.25) weeks. No obstetrical complications were reported. At the time of caesarean section, no defects on the lower segment were retrieved. Regarding the systematic research, among the 21 studies screened, only 4 articles were included in the review. Pregnancy rate was around 60-70 % with very few obstetrical complications (0.01 %) such as abnormal placentation or preterm birth. CONCLUSIONS: Vaginal repair of isthmocele is a minimally invasive, safe and effective surgical approach in terms of postsurgical residual myometrium tichness. Systematic review to date has found low-quality evidences on the impact of vaginal surgery in the management of secondary infertility and obstetrics outcomes in women with isthmocele.

Effects of endometrial versus non-endometrial suturing on isthmocele development; a randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: Incomplete healing after cesarean section (CS) can result in isthmocele formation. When suturing the uterus, fully folding the wound lips may embed the endometrial layer into the myometrium, leading to isthmocele development. Hence, this study aimed to compare the effects of endometrial and non-endometrial suturing on isthmocele development. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This randomized controlled trial included 274 patients. Women who underwent primary CS were randomly allocated to one of the two study groups: endometrial suturing and non-endometrial suturing. The primary outcome was isthmocele rate at postpartum 6 months. Secondary outcomes were the volume of the isthmocele, thickness of the residual myometrium, menstrual irregularities (intermenstrual spotting), and the relationship between the isthmocele and uterine position. RESULTS: A total of 159 patients (81 in the endometrial suturing group and 78 in the non-endometrial suturing group) were analyzed. The incidence of isthmocele was significantly lower in the non-endometrial suturing group than in the endometrial suturing group (12 [15.4%] vs. 24 [29.6%] patients; p = 0.032). Menstrual irregularities, such as intermenstrual spotting, were significantly higher in the endometrial suturing group than in the non-endometrial group (p = 0.019). CONCLUSION: Uterine closure with non-endometrial suturing was associated with significantly lower isthmocele development and less intermenstrual spotting compared to that with endometrial suturing.

Transvaginal Isthmocele Repair With Temporary Occlusion of Uterine Vessels in Caesarean Scar Pregnancy.

A uterine scar defect, or isthmocele, is one of the known complications of cesarean delivery. It can cause obstetric as well as gynecological problems. Diagnosis can be suspected based on complaints such as abnormal uterine bleeding, pelvic pain, dysmenorrhea, and subfertility. It can be investigated by transvaginal ultrasound and MRI hysteroscopy. A hysteroscopy gives a confirmatory diagnosis. Isthmoplasty may be offered to avoid future obstetric complications and treat symptoms. In the present case report, a patient with prolonged postmenstrual dark-colored spotting underwent isthmocele repair by a procedure that could be unique, which is transvaginal isthmocele repair with temporary occlusion of uterine vessels. This procedure offers efficacy, safety, good outcomes, and prospects. Cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP) is a rare but potentially serious complication of cesarean section deliveries. We describe the efficacy, safety, outcomes, and prospects of transvaginal Isthamocele repair with temporary occlusion of uterine vessels to manage CSP.

Efficacy, safety, and feasibility of the treatment of intrauterine pathologies with the mini-resectoscope: A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Hysteroscopy represents the gold standard for the diagnosis and treatment of intrauterine pathologies. The advent of the mini-resectoscope heralded a new era in intrauterine surgery, both in inpatient and outpatient settings. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effectiveness, safety, and feasibility of the mini-resectoscope for the treatment of intrauterine pathologies. SEARCH STRATEGY: Electronic databases were searched for English-language trials describing surgical procedures for uterine pathologies performed with a mini-resectoscope until 30 April 2023. SELECTION CRITERIA: Retrospective or prospective original studies reporting the treatment of uterine pathologies with mini-resectoscope were deemed eligible for the inclusion. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Data about study features, characteristics of included populations, surgical procedures, complications, and results/outcomes were collected. RESULTS: Seven papers that met the inclusion criteria were included in this systematic review. Quantitative analysis was not possible due to data heterogeneity. A descriptive synthesis of the results was provided accordingly to the pathology hysteroscopically removed/corrected: polyps and myomas, uterine septum, intrauterine synechiae, and isthmocele. CONCLUSIONS: The mini-resectoscope is poised to play a leading role in hysteroscopic surgery for many pathologies, both in inpatient and outpatient settings. Since some applications of the mini-resectoscope have not yet been thoroughly investigated, future studies should address current knowledge gaps, designing high-quality comparative trials on specific applications.

Impact of Caesarean section on pregnancy outcomes in ART after transfer of one or more frozen blastocysts.

INTRODUCTION: The prevalence of Caesarean delivery is rising steadily worldwide, and it is important to identify its future impact on fertility. A number of articles have been published on this subject, but the impact of Caesarean section on reproductive outcomes is still under debate, and none of these articles focus exclusively on frozen blastocysts. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of a previous Caesarean delivery compared with a previous vaginal delivery on the chances of a live birth following the transfer of one or more frozen embryos at the blastocyst stage. METHODS: This was a retrospective, bicentric study at the University Hospitals of Nîmes and Montpellier, conducted between January 1st, 2016 and February 1st, 2021. Three hundred and ninety women with a history of childbirth and a transfer of one or more frozen embryos at blastocyst stage were included in the analysis. The primary outcome was the number of live births. Secondary outcomes were: the rate of positive HCG, miscarriage, ectopic pregnancy and clinical pregnancy, as well as the live birth rate according to the presence or absence of an isthmocele. RESULTS: Of the 390 patients included, 118 had a previous Caesarean delivery and 272 a vaginal delivery. No statistically significant differences were found for the primary (p = 0.9) or secondary outcomes. A trend towards lower live birth rates was observed in patients with isthmoceles, but this did not reach significance (p>0.9). On the other hand, transfers were more often described as difficult in the Caesarean delivery group (p = 0.011). CONCLUSION: Our study found no effect of previous Caesarean delivery on the chances of live birth after transferring one or more frozen blastocysts. However, further prospective studies are needed to confirm these results.

Isthmocele, not cesarean section per se, reduces in vitro fertilization success: a systematic review and meta-analysis of over 10,000 embryo transfer cycles.

IMPORTANCE: Previous reviews have shown that a history of cesarean section (CS) is associated with a worse in vitro fertilization (IVF) prognosis. To date, whether the decline in the IVF chances of success should be attributed to the CS procedure itself or to the presence of isthmocele remains to be clarified. OBJECTIVE: To summarize the available evidence regarding the impact of isthmocele on IVF outcomes. DATA SOURCES: Electronic databases and clinical registers were searched until May 30, 2023. STUDY SELECTION AND SYNTHESIS: Observational studies were included if they assessed the effect of isthmocele on IVF outcomes. Comparators were women with isthmocele and women without isthmocele with a previous CS or vaginal delivery. Study quality was assessed using the modified Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. MAIN OUTCOMES: The primary outcome was the live birth rate (LBR). The effect measures were expressed as adjusted odds ratios (aORs) and unadjusted odds ratios (uORs) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs). The body of evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation working group methodology. RESULTS: Eight studies (n = 10,873 patients) were included in the analysis. Women with isthmocele showed a lower LBR than both women with a previous CS without isthmocele (aOR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.53-0.72) and those with a history of vaginal delivery (aOR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.42-0.71). The LBRs in women with a previous CS without isthmocele and those with a history of vaginal delivery were similar (aOR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.47-1.15). Subgroup analysis suggested a negative effect of the intracavitary fluid (ICF) in women with isthmocele on the LBR (uOR, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.18-0.75), whereas the LBRs in women without ICF and those without isthmocele were similar (uOR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.61-1.45). CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: We found moderate quality of evidence (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation grade 3/4) supporting a negative impact of isthmocele, but not of CS per se, on the LBR in women undergoing IVF. The adverse effect of isthmocele on IVF outcomes appears to be worsened by ICF accumulation before embryo transfer. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42023418266.

Efficacy, Safety and Outcomes of the Laparoscopic Management of Cesarean Scar Ectopic Pregnancy as a Single Therapeutic Approach: A Case Series.

A standardized consensus for the management of cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP) is lacking. The study objective is to evaluate the efficacy, safety and outcomes of the laparoscopic management of CSP as a single therapeutic surgical approach without being preceded by vascular pretreatment or vasoconstrictors injection. This is a retrospective bi-centric study, a case series. Eight patients with a future desire to conceive underwent the laparoscopic treatment of unruptured CSPs. Surgery consisted of "en bloc" excision of the deficient uterine scar with the adherent tissue of conception, followed by immediate uterine repair. The data collected for each patient was age, gestity, parity, number of previous c-sections, pre-pregnancy isthmocele-related symptoms, gestational age, fetal cardiac activity, initial ß-human chorionic gonadotropin levels, intra-operative blood loss, blood transfusion, operative time and the postoperative complications, evaluated according to Clavien-Dindo classification. The CSP was successfully removed in all patients by laparoscopy. The surgical outcomes were favorable. All patients with histories of isthmocele-related symptoms reported postoperative resolution of symptoms. The median residual myometrium thickness increased significantly from 1.2 mm pre-operatively to 8 mm 3 to 6 months after surgery. The laparoscopic management seems to be an appropriate treatment of CSP when performed by skilled laparoscopic surgeons. It can be safely proposed as a single surgical therapeutic approach. Larger series and further prospective studies are needed to confirm this observation and to affirm the long-term gynecological and obstetrical outcomes of this management.

Comparison of classic single-layer uterin suture and double-layer purse-string suture techniques for uterus closure in terms of postoperative short-term uterine isthmocele: A prospective randomized controlled trial.

Objective: To compare the short-term results of classic single-layer uterine closure and double-layer purse-string uterine closure (Turan technique) techniques in cesarean section in terms of the incidence of ischiocele formation. Materials and Methods: This was a prospective randomized controlled trial study. Participants undergoing first-time cesarean delivery were randomized into two groups. Fifty-eight participants were included in the double-layered uterine closure group (study group), while 53 participants were randomized into the classical single-layered uterine closure group (control group). For comparison of isthmocele formation, transvaginal ultrasound examination was planned in all patients 6 weeks after surgery. The operation data,the formation of isthmocele, its dimensions and volume were recorded. Results: A total of 111 women were included in the study. The incidence of ischiocele at 6 weeks after birth was not significantly different between the groups (p=0.128). Isthmosel was detected in 20.8% of single-layer closures, and this rate was determined as 10.3% in the purse technique. In the Kerr incision made during surgery, the uterine incision size did not differ in either group, but the uterine incision length after suturing was significantly smaller in the purse technique compared with the other group (p<0.001). Conclusion: The incidence of ischiocele formation after cesarean section and the depth of the ischiocele was independent of the uterotomy closure technique.

Near-infrared and hysteroscopy-guided robotic excision of uterine isthmocele with laser fiber: a novel high-precision technique.

OBJECTIVE: To describe a novel high-precision technique for robotic excision of uterine isthmocele, employing a carbon dioxide laser fiber, under hysteroscopic guidance, and near-infrared guidance. DESIGN: Video article. PATIENT(S): A 36-year-old multipara with 3 prior cesarean sections presented to our infertility clinic with secondary infertility. The patient had been trying to conceive for 6 months without success. The patient underwent a hystero-salpingo contrast sonography that identified a large cesarean scar defect with a 1.4-mm residual myometrial thickness (RMT). The patient was counseled on surgical management with robotic approach because of RMT <3 mm precluding her from hysteroscopic resection and the potential risk for a cesarean scar ectopic or abnormal placentation if she were to become pregnant in the future. She elected to undergo excision and repair and informed consent was obtained from the patient. INTERVENTION(S): The robot was docked for traditional gynecologic robotic surgery. The uterus was injected with 5 units of vasopressin. We used a carbon dioxide laser fiber (Lumenis FIberLase) at a power of 5 watts as the sole energy source for dissection. The bladder was dissected off the uterus to identify the general area of the isthmocele. At that point, diagnostic hysteroscopy was performed using a 30-degree 5-mm hysteroscope (Karl Storz) to identify and enter the isthmocele. Near-infrared vision (da Vinci Firefly, Intuitive USA) was activated to precisely outline the extent of the isthmocele, which was not visible with simple transillumination from the hysteroscope. We proceeded with laser excision in infrared/gray scale using the laser at a power of 20 watts removing the entire area that was highlighted by the Firefly. After full excision of the isthmocele, the hysteroscope was removed and was eventually replaced by a uterine manipulator (ConMed VCare DX). The hysterotomy was closed with a 2-layer closure: 4 mattress sutures of 2-0 Vicryl (Ethicon) followed by a running 2-0 PDS Stratafix (Ethicon). The peritoneal layer was closed over these 2 layers with 2-0 PDS Stratafix (Ethicon) in a running fashion. The uterine manipulator was removed and a 14 French Malecot catheter (Bard) was placed in the uterine cavity to allow the healing to proceed with minimal risk of cervical stenosis. The bladder was backfilled to ensure integrity of the bladder wall. Interceed adhesion barrier (Gynecare) was then placed over the area of the repair and the procedure was concluded. The patient included in this video gave consent for publication of the video and posting of the video online including social media, the journal website, scientific literature websites (such as PubMed, ScienceDirect, Scopus, etc.), and other applicable sites. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Completion of excision and repair of cesarean scar defect without surgical complications. RESULT(S): Robotic excision and repair of a sizable uterine isthmocele with carbon dioxide laser fiber and da Vinci Firefly was completed successfully without any surgical complications. Diagnostic hysteroscopy was used to positively identify the isthmocele and provide transillumination. However, the thickness of the cervical myometrium only allows the hysteroscopic light to shine through the thinnest portion of myometrium at the apex of the isthmocele, whereas the near-infrared vision allowed by the da Vinci Firefly technology was used to precisely identify the borders of the defect. The carbon dioxide laser was used to completely remove the defect while avoiding damage to delicate reproductive tissue and over-excision. No complications were identified during the postoperative visit. Magnetic resonance imaging 3 months after the surgery revealed an RMT of 10 mm at the location of excision compared with the initial RMT of 1.4 mm. CONCLUSION(S): Currently, there is no gold-standard technique for surgical management of isthmocele. This is the first description of the combined use of hysteroscopy, near-infrared vision, and laser fiber for the robotic excision of isthmocele. This specific setup proves to be a useful technical improvement. The use of near-infrared vision combined with precise hysteroscopic targeting allows much clearer definition of he isthmocele borders, and the flexible laser fiber allows millimetric xcision in the absence of appreciable lateral thermal spread. Further investigation is warranted to identify a gold-standard surgical technique for patients with cesarean scar defect.