ABSTRACT
RESEARCH QUESTION: Do different timings of progesterone administration for day 5 and day 6 blastocysts affect the live birth rate (LBR) of artificial frozen embryo transfer (FET) cycles? DESIGN: This retrospective cohort study included 1362 patients who underwent artificial FET cycles. The effects of 6 and 7 days of progesterone administration prior to blastocyst transfer on clinical outcomes were compared in day 5 and day 6 blastocysts. Univariable and multivariable regression analyses were undertaken. RESULTS: In all patients, LBR was comparable between the two groups (51.8% versus 47.9%, Pâ¯=â¯0.165). For day 6 blastocysts, after adjusting for confounders, the 7-day progesterone regimen resulted in a significantly higher LBR (44.8% versus 36.4%, Pâ¯=â¯0.039, adjusted ORâ¯=â¯1.494, 95% CI 1.060-2.106) and lower pregnancy loss rate (15.4% versus 25.2%, Pâ¯=â¯0.031, adjusted ORâ¯=â¯0.472, 95% CI 0.260-0.856) compared with the 6-day progesterone regimen. For day 5 blastocysts, there were no significant differences in pregnancy outcomes between the two regimens, but the rate of low birthweight was higher with the 7-day progesterone regimen than with the 6-day progesterone regimen (13.9% versus 6.7%, Pâ¯=â¯0.032). CONCLUSIONS: In all blastocyst analyses, no difference in LBR was found between the 6- and 7-day progesterone regimens in artificial FET cycles. For day 6 blastocysts, LBR was significantly higher with the 7-day progesterone regimen than with the 6-day progesterone regimen, whereas for day 5 blastocysts, pregnancy outcomes were comparable between the two regimens.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To examine the reproductive outcomes of assisted reproductive technology (ART) in gynecologic cancer patients and to assess maternal and neonatal complications. METHODS: Women diagnosed with gynecologic cancer who underwent their first in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF/ICSI) treatment between 2013 and 2021 at Shanghai Ji Ai Genetics and IVF Institute were included in this study. Infertile women without any history of cancer were matched to the cancer group. The primary outcome was the cumulative live birth rate. Baseline and follow-up data were compared between groups using Student's t-tests for normally distributed variables and with Chi-square test for categorical variables. A propensity score-based patient-matching approach was adopted to ensure comparability between individuals with and without specific cancer type. RESULTS: A total of 136 patients with a history of gynecologic cancer and 241 healthy infertile controls were included in this study. Endometrial cancer constituted 50.70% of the cases and cervical cancer constituted 34.60% of the cases. The cancer group exhibited significantly shorter duration of stimulation, lower levels of estradiol, lower number of retrieved oocytes, day-3 embryos, and blastocysts compared to the control group (P < 0.05). The cumulative live birth rate of the gynecologic cancer group was significantly lower than that of the control group (36.10% vs. 60.50%, P < 0.001). Maternal and neonatal complications did not significantly differ between the groups (P > 0.05). The endometrial cancer and cervical cancer groups showed significantly lower cumulative live birth rates than their matched controls (38.60% vs. 64.50%, P = 0.011 and 24.20% vs. 68.60%, P < 0.001, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: These findings highlight the decreased occurrence of pregnancy and live birth in female gynecologic cancer patients undergoing ART, particularly in endometrial cancers and cervical cancers. These findings have important implications for counseling and managing gynecologic cancer patients undergoing ART.
Subject(s)
Cancer Survivors , Genital Neoplasms, Female , Infertility, Female , Pregnancy Rate , Reproductive Techniques, Assisted , Humans , Female , Retrospective Studies , Adult , Pregnancy , Cancer Survivors/statistics & numerical data , Genital Neoplasms, Female/therapy , Infertility, Female/therapy , Infertility, Female/epidemiology , Birth Rate , Live Birth/epidemiology , Fertilization in Vitro/methods , Pregnancy Outcome/epidemiology , Sperm Injections, Intracytoplasmic , China/epidemiologyABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To determine if industry payments to physicians are associated with a difference in ART practices and outcomes. DESIGN: Retrospective Cohort SETTING: ART centers in the United States SUBJECTS: ART centers EXPOSURES: Industry payments reported to Open Payments 2020 database MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Live birth rate, frozen embryo transfer (FET) rate, intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) rate, preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) rate and percentage of patients >40 years of age were obtained from Center for Disease Control 2020 database. Linear regression analysis was performed comparing the percentage of physicians per center receiving industry payments to clinic-level outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 873 REI physicians received payments in the 2020 database. At least one physician received a payment in 80.5% (437/543) of IVF centers. 873/1724 REI physicians (50.6%) received at least one payment in 2020. Live birth rate, ICSI rate, FET rate, PGT rate and percentage of patients >40 years of age did not significantly differ between centers by percentage of physicians receiving industry payments. However, in sub-analysis of 99 large centers (defined as 5 physicians or more), each percentage increase of physicians receiving industry payments was associated with a 0.20% (CI 0.02-0.39, p = 0.03) PGT rate increase and a 0.14% (CI 0.05-0.24, p <0.001) FET rate increase. Live birth rate, ICSI rate, and percentage of patients >40 were not associated with increased industry payment rates to physicians. CONCLUSIONS: Industry payments were not associated with differences in IVF center outcomes overall. However, large centers with more physicians receiving industry payments may be more likely to utilize additional procedures such as PGT and FET, without improvement in final outcomes such as live birth rate. Further research is needed to determine whether these differences reflect the industry payment influence versus individual center/provider practice habits in larger practices.
ABSTRACT
Objective: This paper serves as an up-to-date narrative review of the most effective methods and outcomes of ovarian tissue cryopreservation (OTC) with new data comparing this method to oocyte and embryo cryopreservation as well as its utility in restoration of endocrine function. Background: Data on OTC are becoming more available as more patients are achieving cancer remission and choosing to use their cryopreserved tissue to conceive or restore endocrine function. With OTC only recently becoming a non-experimental method of fertility preservation, it is important to evaluate, compare, and optimize current practices to improve live birth outcomes. Methods: A literature search of meta-analyses, systematic reviews, case series, retrospective studies, and randomized control trials was performed using the PubMed database with multiple search terms. Discussion: Current practices and outcomes of OTC remain heterogeneous, though they are becoming more streamlined with the emerging data on successful live births. Multiple aspects of OTC have been studied to optimize protocols, particularly methods of cryopreserving, in vitro maturation, and transplantation. In vitro follicle maturation is a novel application with emerging data on methods and outcomes. OTC is a versatile method not only for fertility preservation but also for hormone restoration as well. With wider usage of OTC, ethical dilemmas will need to be addressed. Conclusions: OTC can be used as fertility preservation for a variety of patients. Recent studies suggest it may be comparable to embryo cryopreservation, but with growing data on live births, comparative studies should continue to be performed. In vitro follicle maturation (IVFM) is a promising application of ovarian tissue harvesting. Data are lacking on cost-effectiveness, patient satisfaction, and morbidity associated with OTC.
ABSTRACT
RESEARCH QUESTION: What is the impact of ethanol sclerotherapy of endometriomas prior to IVF/ICSI on pregnancy rates ? DESIGN: We reviewed women with endometrioma(s) larger than 25 mm having IVF/ICSI cycles. All patients with a history of ovarian cystectomy were excluded. Two groups were compared: patients who had transvaginal ethanol sclerotherapy of their endometrioma(s) before ovarian stimulation and patients whose endometrioma(s) were left in situ (untreated) at the time of IVF/ICSI (control group). Analyses were adjusted for confounding factors by inverse probability of treatment weighting. The primary endpoint was progressive pregnancy rates per IVF/ICSI cycle including fresh and frozen embryo transfers. Secondary endpoints were live birth rates, the number of mature oocytes retrieved, pregnancy loss. Endometriomas recurrence rates after sclerotherapy and procedural complications were also analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 96 cycles (67 patients) were included: 46 cycles (34 patients) in the ethanol sclerotherapy group and 50 cycles (33 patients) in the control group. After propensity score weighting, the pregnancy and live-birth rates were significantly higher in the ethanol sclerotherapy group compared to the control group (weighted OR, 2.9 ; 95 CI, 1.4 - 6.6 and weighted OR 2.4 ; 95 CI, 1.1 - 5.4 respectively), with a lower rate of pregnancy loss (weighted OR 0.3 ; 95 CI, 0.1 - 0.9). Ovarian response was similar in the two groups. The recurrence rate of endometrioma at 6 months after sclerotherapy was 20%. CONCLUSION: Sclerotherapy of endometrioma before ovarian stimulation may increase pregnancy rate, with a low rate of recurrence and a minimal risk of complication.
ABSTRACT
Objective: To assess the effect of endometrial thickness (EMT) on live birth rates (LBR) in women with endometrial lining between 7.0-9.9 mm. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included women who underwent fresh and frozen embryo transfers between 2008 and 2018, grouped according to their maximum EMT; group 1: 7.0-7.9 mm, group 2: 8.0-8.9 mm, and group 3: 9.0-9.9 mm and underwent blastocyst transfer. Results: The study included 7091 in-vitro fertilization cycles: 1,385 in group 1, 3,000 in group 2, and 2,706 in group 3. The combined LBR was 22.2%. The mean age of women at oocyte retrieval day was 36.2±4.5 years. There was no difference in female age at oocyte retrieval or in the quality of embryos transferred between the three groups. Group 1 had more diagnoses of diminished ovarian reserve (25.5% vs. 19.5% and 19.1%; P=0.001) and less male factor infertility compared with groups 2 and 3, respectively (25.0% vs. 28.8% and 28.5%; P=0.02). LBR was higher with increasing endometrial thickness, groups 2 vs. group 1 (22.0% vs. 17.4%; P=0.0004), group 3 vs. group 1 (25.0% vs. 17.2%; P<0.001), and group 3 vs. group 2 (25.0% vs. 22.0%; P=0.008). After controlling for confounding factors, these three groups did not differ in LBR (group 1 vs. group 2, OR, 1.08; 95% CI, 0.83-1.4; P=0.54 and group 1 vs. group 3, OR, 1.16; 95% CI, 0.9-1.5; P=0.24). Conclusion: Live birth rates in women with endometrial thickness between 7.0-9.9 mm were not affected by different cut-offs when blastocyst transfer was performed.
ABSTRACT
Background: The global prevalence of infertility is 9%, with male factors potentially accounting for 40% to 60% of cases. Conventional treatments can be ineffective, invasive, costly, and linked to adverse effects and high risks. Previous studies have shown that, Chinese herbal medicine (CHM) can regulate the hypothalamus-pituitary-testis axis, improve sperm abnormalities and quality, mitigate oxidative stress, and decrease DNA fragmentation index (DFI). Yet, the evidence backing the use of Chinese herbal medicine (CHM) for treating male factor infertility lacks conviction due to study design limitations, and there remains a scarcity of studies on the live birth rate following CHM treatment for male factor infertility. Here, we describe the rationale and design of a randomized waitlist-controlled trial to evaluate the effect of CHM on the live birth rate among males with infertility. Methods: This study is a single-center, randomized, waitlist-controlled study. A total of 250 couples diagnosed with male factor infertility will be enrolled in this study and then randomly allocated into two groups in a 1:1 ratio. Male participants in CHM group (treatment group) will receive CHM once a day for 3 months. Male participants in the waitlist group (control group) will not receive any treatment for 3 months. After 3 months, participants in both groups need to be followed up for another 12 months. The primary outcome will be the live birth rate; secondary outcomes include semen quality parameters, DFI and pregnancy related outcomes. Safety will also be assessed. Discussion: The purpose of this trial is to explore the effects and safety of CHM on the live birth rate among couples dealing with male factor infertility. The outcome of this trial may provide a viable treatment option for male factor infertility. Trial registration: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry: ChiCTR2200064416. Registered on 7 October 2022, https://www.chictr.org.cn.
Subject(s)
Drugs, Chinese Herbal , Infertility, Male , Humans , Male , Infertility, Male/drug therapy , Drugs, Chinese Herbal/therapeutic use , Pregnancy , Female , Adult , Pregnancy Rate , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Birth RateABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) on first transfer live birth rate (LBR) and cumulative LBR (CLBR) in donor oocyte IVF cycles. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study of the SART CORS database. SUBJECTS: 11,348 fresh and 7,214 frozen-thawed donor oocyte IVF cycles were analyzed. EXPOSURE: The first reported donor stimulation cycle per patient between January 1, 2014 and December 31, 2015, and all linked embryo transfer cycles between January 1, 2014 and December 31, 2016, were included in the study. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: LBR was compared for patients using fresh and frozen-thawed donor oocytes, with or without PGT-A. Logistic regression models were adjusted for age, body mass index, gravidity, infertility etiology, and prior IVF cycles. RESULTS: Among patients who had blastocysts available for transfer or PGT-A, use of PGT-A was associated with a decreased first transfer LBR (46.9 vs 53.2%, p <0.001) and CLBR (58.4 vs 66.6%, p <0.001) in fresh oocyte donor cycles compared with no PGT-A. LBR in frozen-thawed oocyte donor cycles with PGT-A were nominally higher than those without PGTA (48.3% vs. 40.5%) but were not statistically significant in multivariable logistic regression models (p=0.14). Early pregnancy loss was not significantly different with and without PGT-A. Multiple gestation, preterm birth, and low birthweight infants were all reduced with addition of PGT-A in fresh donor oocyte cycles, though these outcomes were not significantly different when comparing single embryo transfers in fresh oocyte cycles and also not significantly different among frozen-thawed donor oocyte cycles. CONCLUSION: PGT-A in fresh oocyte donor cycles was associated with decreased LBR and CLBR, while effects on frozen-thawed oocyte donor cycles were clinically negligible. Obstetrical benefits associated with PGT-A in fresh donor cycles appear linked to increased single embryo transfer.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: The optimal dosage of recombinant human luteinizing hormone (r-hLH) and its impact on endometrial thickness (EMT) when administered alongside recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone (r-hFSH) during controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) for in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection and embryo transfer are uncertain, which formed the aims of this systematic review and meta-analysis. Method: A search was performed in PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, EMBASE, CNKI, and Wanfang from its inception to 10 July 2023. Twenty-seven Randomized controlled trials comparing r-hFSH/r-hLH co-treatment with r-hFSH alone during in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection and embryo transfer (IVF/ICSI-ET) were included. Pooled odds ratios (OR) for dichotomous data and mean differences (MD) for continuous data, with their respective 95% confidence intervals (CI), were generated. Meta-analysis employed fixed-effect or random-effect models based on heterogeneity, using Q-test and I2-index calculations. The main outcomes included EMT on trigger day, clinical pregnancy rate (CPR) and live birth rate (LBR). Results: r-hFSH/r-hLH significantly increased EMT on trigger day (MD = 0.27; 95% CI, 0.11-0.42; I2 = 13%), but reduced oocyte number (MD = -0.60; 95% CI, -1.07 to -0.14; I2 = 72%) and high-quality embryos (MD = -0.76; 95% CI, -1.41 to -0.10; I2 = 94%) than r-hFSH alone, more pronounced with the gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist long protocol. A subgroup analysis showed r-hLH at 75 IU/day increased CPR (OR = 1.23; 95% CI, 1.02-1.49; I2 = 16%) and EMT on trigger day (MD = 0.40; 95% CI, 0.19-0.61; I2 = 0%). Participants ≥35 years of age exhibited decreased retrieved oocytes (MD = -1.26; 95% CI, -1.78 to -0.74; I2 = 29%), but an increase in EMT on trigger day (MD = 0.26; 95% CI, 0.11-0.42; I2 = 29%). Conclusion: r-hFSH/r-hLH during COS significantly improved EMT compared to r-hFSH alone. An r-hLH dose of 75 IU/day may be considered for optimal pregnancy outcomes, which still require further clinical studies to support this dosing regime. Systematic Review Registration: [www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO], identifier [CRD42023454584].
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To explore the therapeutic efficacy of acupuncture treatment on repeated implantation failure (RIF) patients with cryo-thawed embryo transfer (CET). METHODS: In a retrospective cohort study, all eligible women undergoing RIF were recruited in our center from January 1, 2018 to December 31, 2021. The patients were grouped by whether an acceptance of acupuncture treatment before CET, including the acupuncture group (Acu-group, 55 cycles) and control group (Con-group, 244 cycles). Data were analyzed by using binary logistic regression to explore the relationship of acupuncture treatment with pregnancy outcomes. RESULTS: The Acu-group had higher live-birth rate (LBR) [54.5% vs41.0%, respectively; odds ratio (OR) = 1.105, 95% confidence interval (CI) (1.029, 1.187), P =0.006] and ongoing pregnancy rate (OPR) [56.4% vs43.0%, respectively; OR= 1.100, 95% CI(1.025, 1.181), P =0.008] than the Con-group. There were no significant between-group differences in the rates of implantation [OR= 1.070, 95% CI(0.996, 1.149), P =0.064], clinical pregnancy [OR= 1.065, 95% CI(0.997, 1.138), P =0.061], biochemical pregnancy [OR= 1.002, 95% CI(0.903, 1.112), P =0.967], or miscarriage [OR= 0.778, 95% CI(0.551, 1.099), P =0.155]. Perinatal outcomes did not differ significantly between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Acupuncture treatment could improve the LBR and OPR in RIF patients with CET cycles, suggesting a potential adjuvant therapy of acupuncture to improve the pregnancy outcomes in RIF patients.
Subject(s)
Acupuncture Therapy , Embryo Implantation , Embryo Transfer , Live Birth , Humans , Female , Retrospective Studies , Pregnancy , Adult , Pregnancy Outcome , Pregnancy Rate , Fertilization in VitroABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To evaluate whether the type of frozen embryo transfer (FET) regimen - ovulation-induced regimens vs. hormone replacement therapy regimens (HRT) - is associated with live birth rates and the risk of hypertensive diseases of pregnancy (HDP) in women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). METHODS: All studies in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched using a combination of MeSH terms and keywords. Inclusion criteria included studies on women with a diagnosis of PCOS, utilization of FET, and reporting of pregnancy and/or obstetric outcomes. Studies were excluded if they were case series or conference abstracts or used other FET regimens. A random effects meta-analysis was performed. Primary outcomes include relative risk (RR) of live birth and HDP. RESULTS: Eleven studies were included in the meta-analysis for the final review. Ovulation-induced regimens were associated with a higher live birth rate (8 studies, RR 1.14 [95% CI 1.08, 1.21]) compared to HRT regimens. The risk of HDP (3 studies RR 0.78 [95% CI 0.53, 1.15]) was not significantly different. Ovulation-induced regimens were associated with a lower miscarriage rate (9 studies, RR 0.67 [95% CI 0.59-0.76]). Rates of clinical pregnancy (10 studies, RR 1.05 [95% CI 0.99, 1.11]) and ectopic pregnancy (7 studies, RR 1.40 [95% CI 0.84, 2.33]), were not significantly different. CONCLUSION: This SR/MA demonstrates that for women with PCOS, ovulation-induced FET regimens are associated with higher rates of live birth and lower rates of miscarriage compared to HRT regimens.
ABSTRACT
Objective: This study aims to explore the relationship between different endometrial preparations and pregnancy outcomes among patients with regular ovulatory cycles in order to find the best endometrial preparation methods in the freeze-thaw embryo transfer (FET) cycle. Materials and Methods: This is a retrospective study to investigate FET pregnancy outcomes in women who had a regular menstrual cycle, were younger than 35 years old, and underwent a modified natural cycle (mNC), ovulation induction (OI), or a hormone replacement treatment (HRT) cycle. A total of 1071 frozen cycles were included for analysis. Results: The implantation rate and live birth rate (LBR) in the OI group show a significant difference when compared to the mNC and HRT groups (P < 0.01). After adjusting for confounding factors, the logistic regression analysis revealed that the number of embryos transferred, the embryo stage, and quality were significantly associated with clinical pregnancy rate and LBR. The LBR was additionally affected by the mode of the endometrial preparation; the OI cycle could increase LBR. Conclusions: Endometrial preparation methods affect the LBR in women with a regular menstrual cycle. The OI cycle had an advantage in the LBR of FET.
ABSTRACT
Recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) affects 1-2â¯% of all couples trying to conceive and is a challenging heterogeneous condition. This study aimed to evaluate the prevalence and impact of various risk factors in patients suffering from RPL. We performed a prospective cohort study including patients at the tertiary RPL Unit in the Capital Region of Denmark between 1st January 2000 and 1st January 2023. The main outcome of the study was the first pregnancy after referral and whether the pregnancy was ongoing at least to the 22nd gestational week. A total of 2555 patients were included in the study, out of whom 1892 patients achieved a pregnancy after referral to the RPL Unit. This resulted in 1103 live births (58.3â¯%) and 718 pregnancy losses (37.9â¯%). Maternal age, BMI, smoking status and the number of prior pregnancy losses were negatively correlated with the likelihood of achieving pregnancy. Furthermore, maternal age, prior pregnancy losses, antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) and uterine malformations were associated with reduced birth rates. Patients with secondary RPL had a higher birth rate compared to those with primary RPL, and patients with APS treated with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) demonstrated a significantly increased birth rate compared to untreated APS patients. These findings suggest that certain risk factors significantly impact the likelihood of achieving pregnancy and live birth following RPL, which can be used in patient guidance.
ABSTRACT
RESEARCH QUESTION: What were the clinical outcomes from 332 autologous vitrified- warmed oocyte cycles derived from 3182 elective autologous oocyte freeze cycles carried out between 2008 and 2022 in a single-centre series? DESIGN: In this retrospective observational study, outcomes in 299 patients returning to use their frozen oocytes between 2015 and 2023 were analysed. RESULTS: A total of 3328 elective oocyte vitrification cycles were performed in 2280 patients. The return rate to use oocytes was 14% (299/2171). Mean ages were 37.6 years at storage and 40 at warming. Ninety-three clinical pregnancies and 77 healthy live births were recorded. The live birth rate (LBR) was 24% (39/163) per fresh transfer and 17% (39/227) per embryo transferred. Stratified by age at freezing, the LBR per embryo transferred was 26% (12/47) in participants under 35 years, 20% (24/118) in those 35-39 years and 5% (3/62) in those 40+ years. Frozen embryo transfers (FET) achieved a 30% (24/80) LBR per embryo transfer and a 27% (24/90) LBR per embryo transferred. PGT-A for embryo selection doubled the LBR compared with FET from an untested embryo after one attempt (40% versus 21%). In patients aged over 40 years, the cumulative LBR reached 42% per patient in euploid FET. CONCLUSION: The proportion of patients who returned to use their stored oocytes and the clinical outcomes were consistent with other recent reports and challenges the prevalent critical narrative regarding elective oocyte freezing for fertility preservation. The results are now comparable to routine IVF. Not everyone who returns to use their oocytes will conceive, but for those choosing to preserve their fertility, oocyte freezing can provide reproducible and reassuring results.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Selecting embryos with the highest implantation potential is crucial for in vitro fertilization (IVF) success. Both the timing of blastulation, day 5 (D5) or D6, and the embryo quality have been suggested as influential factors in determining the clinical outcome of single euploid blastocyst transfers. However, evidence supporting the superiority of D5 over D6 blastocysts remains inconclusive. The aim of this study was to compare clinical outcomes following the transfer of euploid blastocysts with different quality and timing of blastulation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted at our Assisted Reproductive Center, analyzing the outcome of 774 transfers with D5 euploids and 155 transfers with D6 euploids performed between January 2019 and February 2022. RESULTS: The live birth rate was significantly lower in the euploid D6 group compared to the euploid D5 group (38.71vs. 55.04%, P=0.001). The outcome was significantly influenced by the quality of the embryos. Live birth rates were 62.14 and 53.61% following transfers of D5 and D6 excellent embryos respectively, 45.18 and 32.21% following transfer of D5 and D6 good embryos but only 28.64 and 19.32% following transfer of D5 and D6 fair embryos. The outcome difference was statistically significant across embryo quality categories (P=0.001). The adjusted risk ratios (RR) of clinical outcomes indicated that excellent euploid D5 embryos consistently outperformed other types of embryo quality. CONCLUSION: The timing of blastulation and embryo quality are crucial factors in determining the success of single euploid blastocyst transfers. Excellent euploid D5 transfers yielded superior clinical outcomes, providing valuable insights for IVF teams and patients when selecting embryos to be transferred.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Vasectomy is a widely used method of contraception. However, some men may have the desire to become biological fathers again after a period. OBJECTIVE: To explore the effect of time since vasectomy and different male comorbidities on live birth rates from intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles using donated oocytes by using testicular spermatozoa obtained by testicular sperm extraction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective study of 123 couples who underwent a testicular sperm extractionâintracytoplasmic sperm injection cycle after vasectomy using donated oocytes. Subjects were divided into groups according to time since vasectomy and the male risk factor evaluated. The main outcomes measured were live birth rate per embryo transfer, per oocyte donation cycle, and per couple. We assessed the cumulative live birth rate according to the time since vasectomy and considered male comorbidities: body mass index, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, dyslipidemia, and smoking. RESULTS: The overall live birth rate per couple was 59.3% (50.6-68.0). Considering the number of embryo transfer and oocyte donation cycle, the live birth rates were 34.1% (27.8-40.4) and 44.5% (36.9-52.1), respectively. The live birth rate according to time since vasectomy was not statistically different between groups. Consequently, the cumulative live birth rate was similar between the different interval times when considering one to eight embryo transfers (p = 0.74). No statistical differences in live birth rate and cumulative live birth rate were found between groups clustered according to male body mass index, smoking, hypertension, and dyslipidemia. However, diabetic male patients had a significantly lower rate of live birth rate per couple (22.2% [4.94-49.4]) than non-diabetic patients did (62.7% [53.7-71.8]) (p = 0.03), but not in their cumulative live birth rate. CONCLUSIONS: The time since vasectomy seems to have no detrimental effects on the live birth rate and cumulative live birth rate in testicular sperm extractionâintracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles with donated oocytes. Male diabetes negatively affects the overall live birth rate per couple, but not the cumulative live birth rate. These results could be useful for multidisciplinary patient-tailored counseling, regarding the chance of having a pregnancy and facilitating the decision-making process of the fertility specialists.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Humans , Hungary/epidemiology , COVID-19/epidemiology , Pregnancy , Female , Infant, Newborn , Delivery, Obstetric/statistics & numerical data , Adult , SARS-CoV-2 , PandemicsABSTRACT
Objective: This study aims to determine whether the live birth rates were similar between GnRH antagonist original reference product Cetrotide® and generic Ferpront®, in gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist protocol for controlled ovarian stimulation (COS). Methods: This retrospective cohort study investigates COS cycles utilizing GnRH antagonist protocols. The research was conducted at a specialized reproductive medicine center within a tertiary care hospital, spanning the period from October 2019 to October 2021. Within this timeframe, a total of 924 cycles were administered utilizing the GnRH antagonist originator, Cetrotide® (Group A), whereas 1984 cycles were undertaken using the generic, Ferpront® (Group B). Results: Ovarian reserve markers, including anti-Mullerian hormone, antral follicle number, and basal follicular stimulating hormone, were lower in Group A compared to Group B. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to balance these markers between the groups. After PSM, baseline clinical features were similar, except for a slightly longer infertile duration in Group A versus Group B (4.43 ± 2.92 years vs. 4.14 ± 2.84 years, P = 0.029). The duration of GnRH antagonist usage was slightly longer in Group B than in Group A (6.02 ± 1.41 vs. 5.71 ± 1.48 days, P < 0.001). Group B had a slightly lower number of retrieved oocytes compared to Group A (14.17 ± 7.30 vs. 14.96 ± 7.75, P = 0.024). However, comparable numbers of usable embryos on day 3 and good-quality embryos were found between the groups. Reproductive outcomes, including biochemical pregnancy loss, clinical pregnancy, miscarriage, and live birth rate, did not differ significantly between the groups. Multivariate logistic regression analyses suggested that the type of GnRH antagonist did not independently impact the number of oocytes retrieved, usable embryos, good-quality embryos, moderate to severe OHSS rate, clinical pregnancy, miscarriage, or live birth rate. Conclusion: The retrospective analysis revealed no clinically significant differences in reproductive outcomes between Cetrotide® and Ferpront® when used in women undergoing their first and second COS cycles utilizing the GnRH antagonist protocol.
Subject(s)
Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone , Hormone Antagonists , Ovulation Induction , Humans , Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone/antagonists & inhibitors , Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone/analogs & derivatives , Female , Retrospective Studies , Ovulation Induction/methods , Pregnancy , Adult , Hormone Antagonists/therapeutic use , Hormone Antagonists/administration & dosage , Hormone Antagonists/adverse effects , Pregnancy Rate , Birth Rate , Drugs, Generic/therapeutic use , Ovarian Reserve/drug effectsABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To assess the developmental competence of oocytes matured following rescue in vitro maturation (IVM). METHODS: PubMed, EmBASE, and SCOPUS were systematically searched for peer-reviewed original papers using relevant keywords and Medical Subject Heading terms. Study quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Odds ratios with a 95% confidence interval were calculated by applying a random effects model. The primary outcomes were fertilization and blastulation rates. Secondary outcomes included abnormal fertilization, cleavage, euploidy, clinical pregnancy, and live-birth rates. RESULT: Twenty-four studies were included in the meta-analysis. The oocytes matured following rescue IVM showed significantly reduced fertilization, cleavage, blastulation, and clinical pregnancy rates compared to sibling in vivo-matured oocytes. No significant differences were found for the euploidy and live-birth rates in euploid blastocyst transfer. In poor responders, a reduced fertilization rate was observed using in vitro-matured GV but not with in vitro-matured MI. A reduced cleavage rate in MI matured overnight compared to < 6 incubation hours was found. CONCLUSION: Our results showed compromised developmental competence in oocytes matured following rescue IVM. However, in poor responders, rescue IVM could maximize the efficiency of the treatment. Notably, our data suggests using in vitro MI matured within 6 incubation hours. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42023467232.