Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 12 de 12
Filter
1.
Cochlear Implants Int ; 24(2): 55-64, 2023 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36583989

ABSTRACT

Objectives: To investigate the outcomes of cochlear re-implantation using multi-mode grounding stimulation associated with anodic monophasic pulses to manage abnormal facial nerve stimulation (AFNS) in cochlear implant (CI) recipients. Methods: Retrospective case report. An adult CI recipient with severe AFNS and decrease in auditory performance was re-implanted with a new CI device to change the pulse shape and stimulation mode. Patient's speech perception scores and AFNS were compared before and after cochlear re-implantation, using monopolar stimulation associated with cathodic biphasic pulses and multi-mode stimulation mode associated to anodic monophasic pulses, respectively. The insertion depth angle and the electrode-nerve distances were also investigated, before and after cochlear re-implantation. Results: AFNS was resolved, and the speech recognition scores rapidly increased in the first year after cochlear re-implantation while remaining stable. After cochlear re-implantation, the e15 and e20 electrodes showed shorter electrode-nerve distances compared to their correspondent e4 and e7 electrodes, which induced AFNS in the first implantation. Conclusions: Cochlear re-implantation with multi-mode grounding stimulation associated with anodic monophasic pulses was an effective strategy for managing AFNS. The patient's speech perception scores rapidly improved and AFNS was not detected four years after cochlear re-implantation.


Subject(s)
Cochlear Implantation , Cochlear Implants , Adult , Humans , Facial Nerve/surgery , Retrospective Studies , Cochlea/surgery , Electric Stimulation , Cochlear Nerve
2.
J Otol ; 17(4): 232-238, 2022 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36249923

ABSTRACT

Objective: To determine the circadian influence on sound sensitivity produced by temporal hearing deprivation in healthy normal human subjects. Design: Participants underwent bilateral earplugging before completion of anthropometry, the author's developed questionnaire, the Hamilton Anxiety and Depression Inventory, pure tone audiometry (PTA), stapedial reflex thresholds (SRT), distortion products otoacoustic emissions input/output (DPOAE-I/O), and uncomfortable loudness levels (ULLs). Afterward, the participants were randomly divided into group A, starting at 8:00 a.m. and finishing at 8:00 p.m., and group B, starting at 4:00 p.m. and ending at 4:00 a.m. Serum cortisol levels and audiological test results were obtained at the beginning and end of the session and 24-h free urinary cortisol levels were measured. Study sample: Thirty healthy volunteers. Results: PTA was 2.68 and 3.33 dB HL in groups A and B, respectively, with no statistical difference between them. ULLs were significantly lower in group A compared to group B, with an average of 8.1 dB SPL in group A and 3.3 dB SPL in group B (p < 0.0001). A SRT shift was observed in group A, with no difference in group B, and a night shift in DPOAE-I/O in group B. Conclusions: Reduced loudness tolerance is demonstrated during daytime hearing deprivation in contrast to nighttime; this may be due to increased central gain in the awake cortex.

3.
Front Hum Neurosci ; 16: 811550, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35677206

ABSTRACT

The use of transcranial Electrical Stimulation (tES) in the modulation of cognitive brain functions to improve neuropsychiatric conditions has extensively increased over the decades. tES techniques have also raised new challenges associated with study design, stimulation protocol, functional specificity, and dose-response relationship. In this paper, we addressed challenges through the emerging methodology to investigate the dose-response relationship of High Definition-transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (HD tDCS), identifying the role of negative valence in tinnitus perception. In light of the neurofunctional testable framework and tES application, hypotheses were formulated to measure clinical and surrogate endpoints. We posited that conscious pairing adequately pleasant stimuli with tinnitus perception results in correction of the loudness misperception and would be reinforced by concurrent active HD-tDCS on the left Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex (dlPFC). The dose-response relationship between HD-tDCS specificity and the loudness perception is also modeled. We conducted a double-blind, randomized crossover pilot study with six recruited tinnitus patients. Accrued data was utilized to design a well-controlled adaptive seamless Bayesian dose-response study. The sample size (n = 47, for 90% power and 95% confidence) and optimum interims were anticipated for adaptive decision-making about efficacy, safety, and single session dose parameters. Furthermore, preliminary pilot study results were sufficient to show a significant difference (90% power, 99% confidence) within the longitudinally detected self-report tinnitus loudness between before and under positive emotion induction. This study demonstrated a research methodology used to improve emotion regulation in tinnitus patients. In the projected method, positive emotion induction is essential for promoting functional targeting under HD-tDCS anatomical specificity to indicate the efficacy and facilitate the dose-finding process. The continuous updating of prior knowledge about efficacy and dose during the exploratory stage adapts the anticipated dose-response model. Consequently, the effective dose range to make superiority neuromodulation in correcting loudness misperception of tinnitus will be redefined. Highly effective dose adapts the study to a standard randomized trial and transforms it into the confirmatory stage in which active HD-tDCS protocol is compared with a sham trial (placebo-like). Establishing the HD-tDCS intervention protocols relying on this novel method provides reliable evidence for regulatory agencies to approve or reject the efficacy and safety. Furthermore, this paper supports a technical report for designing multimodality data-driven complementary investigations in emotion regulation, including EEG-driven neuro markers, Stroop-driven attention biases, and neuroimaging-driven brain network dynamics.

4.
Rev. otorrinolaringol. cir. cabeza cuello ; 82(1): 101-113, mar. 2022. ilus, tab
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: biblio-1389819

ABSTRACT

Resumen La hiperacusia corresponde a la excesiva sensibilidad auditiva o intolerancia a ciertos sonidos cotidianos que para la mayoría de las personas parecerían habituales. Considerando los mecanismos fisiológicos involucrados en el origen de la hiperacusia, es lógico pensar que su presencia podría afectar algunas habilidades del procesamiento auditivo central, sin embargo, la evidencia en torno al tema es escasa y no existe actualmente una revisión de la literatura que agrupe las investigaciones sobre esta temática. Por ello, el presente estudio pretende identificar y analizar la evidencia científica disponible sobre la relación entre hiperacusia y desorden del procesamiento auditivo central. Se realizó una revisión de la literatura guiada por protocolo PRISMA en las bases de datos Proquest, Ebsco, Pubmed, ScienceDirect, Cochrane Library y Scielo de acuerdo con términos claves. Fueron incluidos artículos originales de investigación, revisiones sistemáticas y metaanálisis, publicados desde el año 2010, realizados en animales y humanos, escritos en idiomas inglés, español y portugués. Se encontraron 323 estudios relacionados con los términos claves utilizados, de los cuales 13 cumplieron con los criterios de inclusión y fueron analizados. Se puede concluir que la evidencia científica en torno al tema es escasa e incipiente. Estructuras de la vía auditiva central como núcleos cocleares, lemnisco lateral, colículos inferiores, cuerpo geniculado medial y corteza auditiva primaria estarían relacionadas con la hiperacusia, así como también habilidades de procesamiento auditivo de figura/fondo, ordenación temporal y transferencia interhemisférica se verían afectadas.


Abstract Hyperacusis has been defined as the excessive auditory sensitivity or intolerance to certain everyday sounds that seem common for most people. Considering the underlying physiological mechanisms of hyperacusis, it is reasonable to think that it could affect some abilities involved in the central auditory processing. However, there is lack of evidence about this topic, and there is no literature review that gathers all the existing research. Therefore, the current study intends to identify and analyze the available scientific evidence regarding the relationship between hyperacusis and central auditory processing disorder. The review of the literature followed the PRISMA protocol, using key words in Proquest, Ebsco, Pubmed, ScienceDirect, Cochrane Library and Scielo databases. Original research articles, systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies made with human and animals that have been published since 2010 in English, Spanish and Portuguese were included. Among them, 323 studies were related to the key terms, out of which 13 met the inclusion criteria and were analyzed. It is possible to conclude that there is little and incipient scientific evidence on the topic. Structures of the central auditory pathway such as cochlear nuclei, lateral lemniscus, inferior colliculi, medial geniculate body and primary auditory cortex seem to be related to hyperacusis; auditory processing skills such as figure/ground discrimination, temporal ordering and interhemispheric transfer appear to be affected as well.


Subject(s)
Humans , Animals , Hyperacusis/etiology , Hyperacusis/epidemiology , Auditory Perceptual Disorders/etiology , Auditory Perceptual Disorders/epidemiology , Prevalence
5.
Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol ; 25(1): e54-e63, 2021 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33542752

ABSTRACT

Introduction Loudness perception is considered important for the perception of emotions, relative distance and stress patterns. However, certain digital hearing devices worn by those with hearing impairment may affect their loudness perception. This could happen in devices that have compression circuits to make loud sounds soft and soft sounds loud. These devices could hamper children from gaining knowledge about loudness of acoustical signals. Objective To compare relative loudness judgment of children using listening devices with age-matched typically developing children. Methods The relative loudness judgment of sounds created by day-to-day objects were evaluated on 60 children (20 normal-hearing, 20 hearing aid users, & 20 cochlear implant users), utilizing a standard group comparison design. Using a two-alternate forced-choice technique, the children were required to select picturized sound sources that were louder. Results The majority of the participants obtained good scores and poorer scores were mainly obtained by children using cochlear implants. The cochlear implant users obtained significantly lower scores than the normal-hearing participants. However, the scores were not significantly different between the normal-hearing children and the hearing aid users as well as between the two groups with hearing impairment. Conclusion Thus, despite loudness being altered by listening devices, children using non-linear hearing aids or cochlear implants are able to develop relative loudness judgment for acoustic stimuli. However, loudness growth for electrical stimuli needs to be studied.

6.
Int. arch. otorhinolaryngol. (Impr.) ; 25(1): 54-63, Jan.-Mar. 2021. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS-Express | LILACS | ID: biblio-1154436

ABSTRACT

Abstract Introduction Loudness perception is considered important for the perception of emotions, relative distance and stress patterns. However, certain digital hearing devices worn by those with hearing impairment may affect their loudness perception. This could happen in devices that have compression circuits to make loud sounds soft and soft sounds loud. These devices could hamper children from gaining knowledge about loudness of acoustical signals. Objective To compare relative loudness judgment of children using listening devices with age-matched typically developing children. Methods The relative loudness judgment of sounds created by day-to-day objects were evaluated on 60 children (20 normal-hearing, 20 hearing aid users, & 20 cochlear implant users), utilizing a standard group comparison design. Using a two-alternate forced-choice technique, the children were required to select picturized sound sources that were louder. Results The majority of the participants obtained good scores and poorer scores were mainly obtained by children using cochlear implants. The cochlear implant users obtained significantly lower scores than the normal-hearing participants. However, the scores were not significantly different between the normal-hearing children and the hearing aid users as well as between the two groups with hearing impairment. Conclusion Thus, despite loudness being altered by listening devices, children using non-linear hearing aids or cochlear implants are able to develop relative loudness judgment for acoustic stimuli. However, loudness growth for electrical stimuli needs to be studied.

7.
Cochlear Implants Int ; 22(1): 42-48, 2021 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32972324

ABSTRACT

Objective: This study aims to evaluate the influence of minimum and maximum stimulation levels on auditory thresholds and speech recognition abilities in adult cochlear implant users. Method: Fifteen adults implanted with a Cochlear® device with over 12 months listening experience. Participants underwent routine programming for optimization of minimum (T) and maximum comfort (C) stimulation levels, which was saved in Program 1 (MO). Three further maps were constructed artificially adjusting the measured levels: Program 2 - MO with 10 fewer electrical current units at C level (MC-); Program 3 - MO with 10 fewer electric current units at T level (MT-); and Program 4 - MO with 10 more electric current units at T level (MT+). Sound field thresholds, recorded sentence recognition and monosyllable tests were presented in quiet and in noise. Results: There were significantly better thresholds at 1, 3, 4, and 6 kHz frequencies in MT+ and worse in MC-. A statistically significant difference was observed for sentences in quiet and monosyllables in quiet and noise with changing C levels, with worsening of the results for MC- program. Conclusion: The results suggest that T levels above the behavioural threshold provided an improvement in sound field thresholds but did not influence performance on speech recognition tests in quiet and in noise. In contrast, C levels below the behavioural comfort level worsened sound field thresholds and led to poorer performance in tests of sentence recognition in quiet and monosyllable recognition in quiet and in noise.


Subject(s)
Cochlear Implantation , Cochlear Implants , Speech Perception , Adult , Auditory Threshold , Humans , Noise
8.
Rev. otorrinolaringol. cir. cabeza cuello ; 79(3): 279-289, set. 2019. tab, graf
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: biblio-1058698

ABSTRACT

RESUMEN Introducción: La programación adecuada de los implantes cocleares permiten lograr niveles de estimulación auditivos óptimos. Se realiza de forma individualizada, siendo la detección del umbral de confort ideal un desafío. Se ha descrito la utilidad de los potenciales auditivos del tronco encefálico eléctrico (ePEATC) y el reflejo eléctrico estapedial (eREE) para este propósito. Objetivo: Determinar la posibilidad de realizar ePEATC y eREE en pacientes adultos y pediátricos con implantes cocleares, y evaluar cambios en la programación de los implantes cocleares luego de las mediciones objetivas. Material y método: Se realizó un estudio prospectivo, descriptivo, de pacientes con implante coclear marca MED-EL®, separando los pacientes en dos grupos: el grupo adulto (n =5) y el grupo pediátrico (n =5). Todos los pacientes incluidos presentaron más de 6 meses de encendido del implante. Se evaluaron variables epidemiológicas y tiempo de encendido del implante. Se realizó una otoscopía, prueba básica de funcionamiento del implante, y las mediciones objetivas eléctricas (ePEATC, eREE). Con estos resultados se ajustó el umbral de confort. Resultados: El tiempo promedio de encendido del implante en el grupo adulto fue de 27 meses, y 30 meses en el grupo pediátrico. El ePEATC requiere más tiempo y cooperación al compararlo con eREE. Luego de estas evaluaciones objetivas, fue necesario el ajuste del umbral de confort en tres pacientes adultos, y en dos pacientes pediátricos. Fue necesario realizar una audiometría de campo libre para estimar el umbral de confort en dos pacientes pediátricos que no presentaron respuesta en eREE. Conclusión: Fue posible realizar estas mediciones objetivas en pacientes adultos y pediátricos, siendo mejor tolerado y requiriendo menos tiempo, el eREE.


ABSTRACT Introduction: Mapping a cochlear implant allows for adjusting ideal electrical stimulation limits. It is an individualized process and detecting the most comfortable loudness level can be challenging. The use of electrically evoked auditory brainstem response (ePEATC) and electrically evoked stapedius reflex thresholds (eREE) have been considered for this purpose. Aim: To determine the feasibility of performing ePEATC and eREE on adult and pediatric patients with a cochlear implant, and to evaluate changes in programming following these objective measures. Material and method: A prospective, descriptive study was completed, of patients with MED-EL® cochlear implants, separating patients into two groups: adults (n=5) and children (n=5). All of the patients included had their implants activated for 6 months or longer. Epidemiological variables and duration of implant activation were evaluated. Otoscopy, a basic implant functioning evaluation, and objective measures (ePEATC, eREE) were performed. With these results, comfortable loudness levels were adjusted. Results: Average duration of implant activation was 27 months and 30 months, for adults and children respectively. Performing ePEATC required more time and cooperation as compared to eREE. Following the objective measures, adjustment of the comfortable loudness levels was required for three adult and two pediatric patients. Sound field audiometry was necessary for two pediatric patients in order to estimate the comfortable loudness levels because the eREE responses were absent. Conclusions: It is feasible to perform these objective measures for both adult and pediatric patients, with eREE requiring less time and being better tolerated by patients.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Child, Preschool , Child , Adult , Middle Aged , Young Adult , Cochlear Implants , Cochlear Implantation/methods , Reflex, Acoustic , Audiometry , Telemetry , Prospective Studies , Evoked Potentials, Auditory, Brain Stem , Health Services Programming
9.
Audiol., Commun. res ; 23: e1785, 2018. tab
Article in Portuguese | LILACS | ID: biblio-888388

ABSTRACT

RESUMO Introdução: A qualidade da emissão vocal é dependente da integridade do mecanismo de retroalimentação auditiva. A presença de eventuais falhas nesse mecanismo está relacionada à indução do abuso e/ ou mau uso vocal e, por conseguinte, do surgimento de quadros de disfonia. Objetivo: Avaliar a influência da retroalimentação auditiva na intensidade e na frequência da voz, em indivíduos sem queixas vocais. Métodos: Participaram da pesquisa 40 sujeitos do gênero feminino, sem queixas vocais e com limiares auditivos dentro dos padrões de normalidade. As participantes foram submetidas a uma avaliação auditiva, composta por audiometria tonal liminar, imitanciometria e por uma avaliação acústica vocal dos parâmetros de intensidade e frequência, realizada em três momentos: antes, durante e após a exposição ao ruído branco. Resultados: Houve diferença significativa na relação das médias obtidas na intensidade e entre o limiar dos reflexos acústicos contralaterais e as frequências vocais, nos três momentos da avaliação acústica. Conclusão: Os achados sugerem que a retroalimentação auditiva interfere no controle da intensidade e frequência vocal.


ABSTRACT Introduction: The quality of the vocal emission is dependent on the integrity of the auditory feedback mechanism of the presence of eventual failures is related to the induction of abuse and / or vocal misuse, and therefore of the surgeon of dysphonia. Purpose: To evaluate the influence of auditory feedback in voice intensity and frequency in individuals with no vocal complaints. Methods: Participants were 40 female subjects without vocal and auditory thresholds within normal standards complaints. Participants underwent an auditory evaluation composed of pure tone audiometry, tympanometry and a vocal acoustic assessment of intensity and frequency parameters, carried out in three stages: before, during and after exposure to white noise. Results: There was significant difference in the average of the ratio obtained in intensity and between the threshold of contralateral acoustic reflexes and vocal frequencies in the three moments of acoustic evaluation. Conclusion: Thus, the findings suggest that auditory feedback interferes with the control of the intensity and vocal frequency.


Subject(s)
Humans , Female , Auditory Perception , Pitch Discrimination , Voice Quality , Audiometry, Pure-Tone , Auditory Threshold , Feedback , Reflex, Acoustic , Stapedius
10.
PeerJ ; 2: e437, 2014.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24949249

ABSTRACT

Understanding female mate preference is important for determining the strength and direction of sexual trait evolution. The sound pressure level (SPL) acoustic signalers use is often an important predictor of mating success because higher sound pressure levels are detectable at greater distances. If females are more attracted to signals produced at higher sound pressure levels, then the potential fitness impacts of signalling at higher sound pressure levels should be elevated beyond what would be expected from detection distance alone. Here we manipulated the sound pressure level of cricket mate attraction signals to determine how female phonotaxis was influenced. We examined female phonotaxis using two common experimental methods: spherical treadmills and open arenas. Both methods showed similar results, with females exhibiting greatest phonotaxis towards loud sound pressure levels relative to the standard signal (69 vs. 60 dB SPL) but showing reduced phonotaxis towards very loud sound pressure level signals relative to the standard (77 vs. 60 dB SPL). Reduced female phonotaxis towards supernormal stimuli may signify an acoustic startle response, an absence of other required sensory cues, or perceived increases in predation risk.

11.
Rev. Soc. Bras. Fonoaudiol ; 17(3): 321-326, 2012. tab
Article in Portuguese | LILACS | ID: lil-649793

ABSTRACT

OBJETIVO: Verificar e comparar a ocorrência das modificações vocais de repórteres e não-repórteres na presença de ruído mascarante. MÉTODOS:Participaram 46 sujeitos, sendo 23 repórteres e 23 não-repórteres (grupo controle), todos com audição normal. Os participantes deveriam ler um trecho de uma matéria de telejornal em três situações de escuta: sem ruído mascarante, com ruído de 50 dB, e com ruído de 90 dB. As narrações foram gravadas e submetidas à avaliação perceptivo-auditiva (realizada por uma fonoaudióloga especialista em voz) e análise acústica (medidas extraídas por meio do Software Voxmetria - CTS Informática). RESULTADOS: Com 50 dB de mascaramento, houve maior aumento nos parâmetros pitch (82,6%), loudness (91,3%) e tensão (82,6%) no grupo controle, quando este foi comparado ao grupo dos repórteres. O mesmo ocorreu com ruído de 90 dB para os parâmetros pitch (95,7%), loudness (100%) e tensão (91,3%). CONCLUSÃO: As consequências negativas do efeito Lombard ocorrem em ambos os grupos, porém, pelas respostas apresentadas, os repórteres demonstram conseguir inibir parcialmente o impacto negativo das situações de ruído, por provável estabilidade da emissão profissional e ativação de outras vias de monitoramento.


PURPOSE: To investigate and compare the occurrence of vocal changes in the presence of masking noise between reporters and other professionals. METHODS: Participants were 46 subjects with normal hearing, 23 reporters (study group) and 23 non-reporters (control group). Participants read an excerpt from a TV news broadcast in three listening situations: without masking noise, with 50 dB white noise, and with 90 dB white noise. The narrations were recorded and then submitted to auditory-perceptual and acoustic analyses. The auditory-perceptual analysis was performed by a speech-language pathologist specialized in voice. The acoustic analysis used the software Voxmetria (CTS Informática) to perform the acoustic measurements. RESULTS: In the situation with 50 dB masking noise, individuals in the control group had higher increase of the following parameters, when compared to the group of reporters: pitch (82.6%), loudness (91.3%), and strain (82.6%). The same occurred in the situation with 90 dB masking noise for the same parameters: pitch (95.7%), loudness (100%) and strain (91.3%). CONCLUSION: The negative consequences of the Lombard effect occur in both groups; however, reporters showed the ability to partially inhibit the negative impact of noise situations, probably due to the stability of the professional speech production and activation of other feedback pathways.

12.
Pró-fono ; Pró-fono;20(1): 19-24, jan.-mar. 2008. tab
Article in Portuguese | LILACS | ID: lil-480036

ABSTRACT

TEMA: o processamento auditivo temporal se refere a percepção de um evento sonoro ou de uma alteração no mesmo, dentro de um intervalo definido de tempo e é considerado uma habilidade fundamental na percepção auditiva de sons verbais e não verbais, na percepção de música, ritmo e pontuação e na discriminação de pitch, de duração e de fonemas. OBJETIVO: realizar um estudo comparativo do desempenho de adultos jovens normais nos testes de resolução temporal, Random Gap Detection Test (RGDT) e Gaps-in-Noise (GIN) e analisar diferenças entre esses dois métodos de avaliação. MÉTODO: 25 universitários, 11 homens e 14 mulheres, com audição normal e sem histórico de alterações educacionais, neurológicas e/ou linguagem, foram submetidos ao RGDT e ao GIN, a 40dB NS. RESULTADO: observou-se diferença estatisticamente significante entre os sexos sendo que as mulheres apresentaram pior desempenho nos dois testes. No estudo comparativo dos resultados do RGDT e GIN, observaram-se diferenças significativas no desempenho da amostra. De maneira geral, os limiares de detecção de gap no teste GIN foram melhores do que os limiares obtidos no RGDT. CONCLUSÃO: o sexo masculino teve melhor desempenho tanto no teste RGDT quanto no GIN, quando comparado ao feminino. Além disso, não houve diferença significante nas repostas do GIN nas orelhas direita e esquerda. Os sujeitos deste estudo tiveram melhor desempenho no teste GIN, quando comparado ao RGDT, tanto no sexo masculino quanto no feminino. Portanto, o teste GIN apresentou vantagens sobre o RGDT não apenas quanto à sua validade e sensibilidade, mas também com relação a sua aplicação e correção dos resultados.


BACKGROUND: temporal auditory processing is defined as the perception of sound or of sound alteration within a restricted time interval and is considered a fundamental ability for the auditory perception of verbal and non verbal sounds, for the perception of music, rhythm, periodicity and in the discrimination of pitch, duration and of phonemes. AIM: to compare the performance of normal Brazilian adults in two temporal resolution tests: the Gaps-in-Noise Test (GIN) and the Random Gap Detection Test (RGDT), and to analyze potential differences of performance in these two tests. METHOD: twenty-five college students with normal hearing (11 males and 14 females) and no history of educational, neurological and/or language problems, underwent the GIN and RGDT at 40dB SL. RESULTS: statistically significant gender effects for both tests were found, with female participants showing poorer performance on both temporal processing tests. In addition, a comparative analysis of the results obtained in the GIN and RGDT revealed significant differences in the threshold measures derived for these two tests. In general, significantly better gap detection thresholds were observed for both male and female participants on the GIN test when compared to the results obtained for the RGDT. CONCLUSION: male participants presented better performances on both RGDT and GIN, when compared to the females. There were no differences in performance between right and left ears on the GIN test. Participants of the present investigation, males and females, performed better on the GIN when compared to the RGDT. The GIN presented advantages over the RGDT, not only in terms of clinical validity and sensibility, but also in terms of application and scoring.


Subject(s)
Adolescent , Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Young Adult , Audiometry/methods , Auditory Diseases, Central/diagnosis , Auditory Perception/physiology , Auditory Threshold/physiology , Acoustic Stimulation , Audiometry, Pure-Tone/standards , Audiometry/standards , Brazil , Loudness Perception/physiology , Noise , Reaction Time , Sensitivity and Specificity , Sex Factors , Speech Perception/physiology , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL