Coping strategies and considerations regarding low anterior resection syndrome and quality of life among patients with rectal cancer; a qualitative interview study.

Introduction: Low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) is defined as disordered bowel function following rectal resection, which is detrimental to quality of life (QoL). A recent international consensus definition of LARS stresses the importance of focusing on both the symptoms and the consequences that the symptoms have for the individual patient as studies indicate that LARS has a negative impact on patients' QoL. However, an ongoing PROM study investigating late sequelae after rectal cancer finds that a minor proportion of patients scoring major LARS experience none or only little impact on quality of life. Aim: The aim of this study was to identify patients' considerations and coping strategies to establish why the burden caused by major LARS had little or no influence on their QoL. Materials and methods: This was a qualitative interview study based on 21 semi-structured individual telephone interviews with patients treated for rectal cancer. Data were analysed using a hermeneutic inspired thematic analysis. Results and conclusion: Three themes emerged from the analysis; Adapting new life situation, Altering life perception and the Importance of relationships. Major LARS and its consequences following rectal cancer may be managed or altered by adopting problem-focused and emotion-focused coping strategies. Maintaining a positive attitude and having a good network of family and friends constitute a surplus, allowing patients to cope with the need for changed behaviour and appreciate the life that they have been given. Accepting that major LARS and its consequences cause limitations in life allowed patients to change their normality threshold over time.

The incidence and risk factors of low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) after sphincter-preserving surgery of rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Many patients after sphincter-preserving surgery experienced anorectal functional disturbances which were known as low anterior resection syndrome (LARS). Although many studies investigated LARS, there was inconsistency of their assessment tools and results. The aim of this systematic review was to elucidate the incidence and risk factors of LARS by a validated tool-LARS score. METHODS: A systematic literature search in Pubmed, Embase, and Cochrane Library was conducted in April 2020. Studies investigating patients who were evaluated by LARS score 1 year after their sphincter-preserving surgery due to rectal cancer were included. Meta-analysis of incidence was conducted using the double arcsine method. Meta-analysis of each risk factor was conducted using a random effects model. RESULTS: A total of 50 studies were included. The pooled incidence of major LARS was 44% (95% CI 40-48%; I2 = 88%; 36 studies). Long course neoadjuvant radiotherapy (OR 2.89, 95% CI 2.06-4.05; I2 = 47%; P < 0.01; 10 studies), total mesorectal excision (TME) (OR 2.13, 95% CI 1.49-3.04; I2 = 53%; P < 0.01; 7 studies), anastomotic leak (OR 1.98, 95% CI 1.34-2.93; I2 = 39%; P < 0.01; 9 studies), and diverting stoma (OR 1.89, 95% CI 1.58-2.27; I2 = 0%; P < 0.01; 13 studies) were associated with increased risk of major LARS. No significant difference was found in major LARS incidence between transanal TME and laparoscopic TME (OR 1.36, 95% CI 0.78-2.40; I2 = 19%; P = 0.28; 4 studies). Pouch reconstruction failed to lower the risk of major LARS in long term (OR 1.43, 95% CI 0.88-2.33; I2 = 70%; P = 0.29; 9 studies). CONCLUSION: The incidence of major LARS after sphincter-preserving surgery is relatively high. Neoadjuvant radiotherapy, TME, anastomostic leak, and diverting stoma are major risk factors. No significant differences in postoperative anorectal functions were observed between transanal and laparoscopic TME. Pouch reconstruction was not found to be significantly beneficial to anorectal functions in long term.

The burden of low anterior resection syndrome on quality of life in patients with mid or low rectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Low anterior resection (LAR) with total mesorectal excision (TME) for mid and low rectal cancer is standard of care, reducing local recurrence and enhancing long-term survival. However, this surgery is associated with a constellation of major defecatory problems that are collectively referred to as low anterior resection syndrome (LARS). The aims of this study were to evaluate the frequency of LARS in patients who have undergone LAR and to assess the impact of LARS on long-term quality of life (QoL). METHODS: This was a single-center prospective survey study on patients who underwent LAR and TME for low or mid rectal cancer between 2007 and 2015. LARS score and QLQ-C30 questionnaires were used to evaluate patient's bowel functions and quality of life, respectively. Associations between LARS and QoL were evaluated. RESULTS: Fifty-seven patients out of 65 eligible agreed to participate in the study. Forty-three (66%) patients returned complete questionnaires. Five patients (11.6%) had no LARS, 7 had minor LARS (16.3%), and 31 had major LARS (72.1%). In univariate analysis, BMI > 30 kg/m2 was predictive of major LARS (p = 0.047). Major LARS did not impair global QoL (p = 0.75), function scores, or social scales, and was not associated with any of the symptom scores except for diarrhea (p = 0.02). CONCLUSION: LARS is a frequent occurrence after LAR and TME for rectal cancer (72.1%) and is more prevalent in morbidly obese patients. However, the occurrence of LARS does not appear to have a direct impact on QoL except for the occurrence of diarrhea.