A Comparative Study on Aesthetic and Pain Outcomes in Flap Versus Implant Breast Reconstruction After Mastectomy.

Breast cancer is the most commonly diagnosed cancer and the leading cause of cancer death among women worldwide. Surgical treatments, including mastectomy and subsequent breast reconstruction, are critical components of breast cancer management. This systematic review compares the outcomes of flap versus implant reconstruction post-mastectomy, focusing on aesthetic differences, pain, recovery, and psychological adaptation. Adhering to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines, we conducted a comprehensive literature search across PubMed, Cochrane, and ScienceDirect databases. Inclusion criteria targeted studies comparing aesthetic outcomes, pain, recovery costs, duration, and psychological adaptation between flap and implant breast reconstructions. We excluded non-English and non-Spanish studies, case reports, and those without full-text availability. The risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). From an initial pool of 25,881 articles, 16 high-quality studies involving 14,196 participants were selected for synthesis. Flap reconstruction was associated with higher patient satisfaction regarding aesthetic outcomes and psychological well-being but also had higher complication rates, including infections and wound dehiscence. Implant reconstruction showed fewer complications but did not achieve the same level of patient satisfaction. Flap reconstruction, despite its higher complication rates, tends to provide superior aesthetic and psychological outcomes compared to implant reconstruction. These findings highlight the importance of personalized treatment plans considering individual patient needs and preferences. Future research should focus on long-term randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and standardized outcome measures to further delineate the comparative effectiveness of these reconstruction techniques. Personalized care and ongoing research are essential to improving the quality of life for breast cancer survivors undergoing reconstruction.

Evaluating the Effect of MarginProbe® Use on Re-excisions After Partial Mastectomy: A Single-Institution Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Breast conservation therapy is a widely accepted approach in treating breast cancer, yet the average re-excision rates are approximately 25% despite surgical advancements. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved MarginProbe® device uses radiofrequency spectroscopy for intraoperative margin assessment, potentially reducing re-excision rates. This study evaluated the effectiveness of MarginProbe® in reducing re-excisions compared with standard of care (SOC). METHODS: A prospective cohort with MarginProbe® usage during partial mastectomies from June 2019 to July 2023 (153 patients) was compared with a retrospective control group without the device from January 2015 to May 2019 (300 patients). Both groups underwent partial mastectomies performed by two breast surgeons. Positive margins were defined as tumor on ink for invasive cancers and within 2 mm for ductal carcinoma in situ. RESULTS: When control was used for patient demographics and tumor characteristics, the findings showed that MarginProbe® significantly decreased the probability of re-excision by 58% (p < 0.001), although it led to a higher shave volume, with an average of 9.8 cc additional tissue removed compared with SOC (p < 0.001). Human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2) positivity was significantly associated with increased odds of re-excision (p = 0.036). MarginProbe® demonstrated a sensitivity of 70.1% and a specificity of 47.5%. CONCLUSIONS: MarginProbe® is an effective adjunct for intraoperative margin assessment to decrease re-excision rates. However, patient selection is paramount. Given its significant increase in shave volume, women with small breasts may be at higher risk for poor cosmesis. Surgeons should exercise clinical judgement when determining the suitability of MarginProbe® use for patients undergoing breast conservation. Further research is necessary to refine MarginProbe®'s specificity and to optimize its clinical application.

Immediate Psychological Implications of Risk-Reducing Mastectomies in Women With Increased Risk of Breast Cancer: A Comparative Study.

BACKGROUND: Risk-reducing mastectomy is recommended for high-risk patients but may have significant psychological consequences. This study aimed to determine the differences in anxiety, depressive symptomatology, body image and quality of life in women with an increased risk of breast cancer immediately before and after undergoing risk-reducing mastectomy. METHODS: Eighty-eight women with an increased risk of breast cancer due to BRCA1/2 mutations or a previous cancer diagnosis participated in this study. Instruments used were the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, Body Image Scale and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality-of-Life Questionnaire Core 30 and Breast 23, administered 15-30 days before and after surgery. RESULTS: Following surgery, there was an immediate and significant worsening in anxiety, depressive symptomatology and body image. There was a significant deterioration in global, physical, role, and social functioning, as well as in body image and sexual enjoyment scales. Additionally, there were increases in fatigue, nausea and vomiting, constipation, dyspnoea, insomnia, appetite loss, perceived financial difficulties, pain, systemic therapy side effects, and breast and arm symptoms. However, there was an improvement in future perspective. These changes occurred independently of whether participants had a cancer diagnosis or BRCA1/2 mutation. CONCLUSION: Risk-reducing mastectomies have immediate psychological consequences. While these procedures improve future health perspective, they increase anxiety and depressive symptomatology and decrease body image and quality of life, regardless of cancer diagnosis or BRCA1/2 mutation. These findings highlight the psychological consequences of such surgical procedures, emphasizing the need for comprehensive psychological interventions both before and after surgery.

Long-Term Oncologic Outcomes of Omitting Axillary Surgery in Breast Cancer Patients with Chest Wall Recurrence after Mastectomy.

BACKGROUND: The management of the axilla in breast cancer patients with isolated chest wall recurrence (CWR) after mastectomy remains controversial. Although sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) for restaging is feasible, its role is unclear. We aimed to determine if the omission of axillary restaging surgery in female patients with operable presumably isolated CWRs could result in an increased risk of second recurrences. METHODS: In this retrospective multicentre study, patients who developed CWRs were reviewed. We excluded patients with suspected or concomitant regional/distant metastases, bilateral cancers and patients without CWR surgery. Patients' demographics, pathological data and subsequent recurrences were collected from a prospective database and were compared between patients with axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) and/or SLNB versus no axillary operation at CWR. FINDINGS: A total of 194 patients with CWRs were eligible. The median age at CWR was 56.0 (IQR 47.0-67.0) years old. At recurrence, 8 (4.1%), 5 (2.6%) and 181 (93.3%) patients had ALND, SLNB and no axillary operation, respectively. Patients with no axillary surgery during CWR were associated with, at primary cancer, a lower incidence of ductal carcinoma in situ as diagnosis (p = 0.007) and older age (p = 0.022). Subsequent ipsilateral axillary (p = 0.768) and second recurrences (p = 0.061) were not statistically different between patients with and without axillary surgery at CWR on median follow-up of 59.5 (IQR 27.3-105) months. INTERPRETATION: In patients without evidence of concomitant regional or distant metastasis at CWR diagnosis, omission of axillary restaging surgery was not associated with an increased ipsilateral axillary or second recurrences on long-term follow-up.

Comparative study of muscle-sparing latissimus dorsi vs breast implants following total mastectomy.

INTRODUCTION: With 60,000 cases per year, breast cancer is the most frequent type of cancer in France, and a quarter of these cases require mastectomy. Following the surgery, breast reconstruction can be indicated. Two of the available techniques are breast implants (BIs) and muscle-sparing latissimus dorsi (MSLD). The aim of this study was to compare postoperative complications of each approach and thus help the surgeon and the patient in making an informed decision before surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This descriptive, retrospective and single-centre study was conducted in the Croix Rousse hospital in Lyon (France) between 1 July 2018 and 1 July 2023. It included women aged ≥18 years who underwent mastectomy followed by (immediate or delayed) breast reconstruction with MSLD or BI. Complications were recorded and evaluated using the Clavien-Dindo classification. RESULTS: Over the course of the study, 92 patients were managed with MSLD reconstruction and 63 patients with BI. We observed a complication rate of 62% in the BI group and 39% in the MSLD group (odds ratio [OR]=0.16; p < 0.005). Body mass index (BMI) significantly impacted this rate (OR=1.11; p = 0.01), whereas smoking status and diabetes did not. No complication occurred more predominantly than others. A second surgery was required more often in the BI group (p < 0.005). There were no severe complications (>Grade 4). CONCLUSION: MSLD predicted fewer complications and was associated with a shorter hospital stay compared with implants, suggesting that it may be a preferable option for breast reconstruction.

Prevalence and Severity of Chronic Pain in Patients Receiving Mastectomy with Alloplastic Immediate Breast Reconstruction: A Survey Study.

Introduction: Breast cancer is the most frequently diagnosed cancer worldwide. For those undergoing mastectomy, the choice of alloplastic immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) is increasingly favored. Post-operative chronic pain is an important consideration in this decision, but there is a paucity of data for those undergoing alloplastic IBR. We sought to examine the prevalence, severity, and risk factors for the development of chronic pain in this cohort using validated patient-reported outcome measures. Methods: A cross-sectional survey study was conducted among patients receiving mastectomy with alloplastic IBR. Participants completed 3 surveys querying chronic pain, specifically the Breast Cancer Pain Questionnaire (BCPQ), Brief Pain Inventory (BPI), and BREAST-Q. Participant medical records were reviewed for demographic and surgical variables. Results: A total of 118 patients participated in the study-a response rate of 33.6%. Chronic pain prevalence was high (52.5%), and only 29.0% of these patients had consulted a physician regarding their pain. Among those reporting chronic pain (n = 62), the median severity of pain was 3.1 on an 11-point scale. Chronic pain was associated with radiation (p = .018), bilateral reconstruction (p = .05), worse emotional health (p = .0003), less self (p = .022), and sexual confidence (p = .044). Inter-tool reliability was high, with no significant difference in responses between the 3 surveys. Conclusion: In this cohort, chronic pain is supported as a significant concern among patients who have undergone mastectomy with alloplastic IBR. Given the burden of chronic pain, there is an opportunity to intervene with preventative measures and support for its management.

Introduction: Le cancer du sein est le cancer le plus souvent diagnostiqué dans le monde. L'option de reconstruction mammaire immédiate (RMI) alloplastique est de plus en plus souvent choisie par les patientes subissant une mastectomie. La douleur chronique postopératoire est un important facteur à prendre en compte dans cette décision, mais nous ne disposons que peu de données pour les patientes ayant une RMI alloplastique. Nous avons cherché à étudier la prévalence, la sévérité et les facteurs de risque de survenue d'une douleur chronique dans cette population de patients au moyen de mesures validées de déclaration des résultats. Méthodes: Une enquête transversale a été réalisée parmi les patientes ayant bénéficié d'une RMI alloplastique. Les participants ont répondu à trois enquêtes portant sur la douleur chronique (plus spécifiquement le questionnaire sur la douleur dans le cancer du sein [BCPQ], le Questionnaire court sur la douleur [BPI ou Brief Pain Inventory] et le BREAST-Q). Les dossiers médicaux des participantes ont été examinés à la recherche des variables démographiques et chirurgicales. Résultats: Un total de 118 patientes a participé à l'étude, soit un taux de réponse de 33.6%. La prévalence de la douleur chronique était élevée (52.5%) et seulement 29.0% de ces patientes avaient consulté un médecin à propos de cette douleur. Parmi les participantes signalant une douleur chronique (n = 62), la sévérité médiane de la douleur était de 3,1 sur une échelle de 11 points. La douleur chronique a été associée à la radiothérapie (p = .018), à une reconstruction bilatérale (p = .05), à une aggravation de la santé émotionnelle (p = .0003), à une moindre confiance en soi (p = .022) et sur le plan de la sexualité (p = .044), La fiabilité inter-outils a été élevée, sans différence significative entre réponses dans les trois enquêtes. Conclusion: Il est confirmé que, dans cette cohorte, la douleur chronique est une préoccupation importante chez les patientes ayant subi une mastectomie avec RMI alloplastique. Considérant le fardeau que représente la douleur chronique, il y a une opportunité d'intervention en utilisant des mesures préventives et en apportant un soutien pour sa gestion.

Trends and Early Complications in Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction: An Updated Analysis of the ACS-NSQIP Database.

Background: Rates of direct-to-implant (DTI) breast reconstruction, in which breast implants are placed at the time of mastectomy, have been consistently rising. Advances in surgical adjuncts and technology, such as acellular dermal matrices (ADM), have made DTI reconstruction safer and more reliable. However, few studies have characterized early (30-day) postoperative complications following DTI. The aim of this study was to obtain a current understanding of early postoperative outcomes following DTI breast reconstruction. Methods: Using data from the American College of Surgeons-National Surgical Quality Improvement Program, we analyzed complications for female patients who underwent DTI reconstruction from 2017 to 2019, as well as trends in DTI reconstruction from data on mastectomy and DTI reconstruction from 2010 to 2019. We grouped complications into major surgical (including return to the operating room) or medical complications. Statistical analysis was performed using Fischer's exact test for categorical variables, Student's t-test for continuous variables, and logistic regression. Results: DTI breast reconstruction rates have increased since 2010. Among our 2017-2019 cohort of 4204 patients, the early major surgical complication rate was approximately 10% (422 patients) and the major medical complication rate was 0.83% (35 patients). Regression modeling identified body mass index, smoking status, hypertension, bleeding disorders, and intraoperative blood transfusion as having a relationship with surgical complications (P < .001). Conclusions: Despite increased use of ADM and indocyanine green angiography, compared to prior studies, early postoperative complications have remained stable. Further studies are needed to assess long-term complications and patient-reported outcomes in DTI breast reconstruction.

Historique: Le taux de reconstructions mammaires immédiates, c'est-à-dire que les implants mammaires sont installés au moment de la mastectomie, augmentent régulièrement. Grâce aux progrès des adjuvants chirurgicaux et de la technologie, tels que les matrices dermiques acellulaires (MDA), la reconstruction mammaire immédiate est désormais plus sécuritaire et plus fiable. Cependant, peu d'études ont caractérisé les complications précoces suivant une telle intervention (dans les 30 jours). La présente étude visait à comprendre les résultats postopératoires précoces actuels après une reconstruction mammaire immédiate. Méthodologie: À l'aide des données de l'American College of Surgeons-National Surgical Quality Improvement Program, les chercheurs ont analysé les complications qu'ont subies les femmes après une reconstruction mammaire immédiate entre 2017 et 2019, de même que les tendances de ce type de reconstruction à partir des données sur la mastectomie et la reconstruction mammaire immédiate entre 2010 et 2019. Ils ont divisé les complications entre les complications chirurgicales majeures (y compris le retour en salle opératoire) et les complications médicales. Ils ont effectué les analyses statistiques à l'aide de la méthode exacte de Fischer pour les variables nominales, du test de Student pour les variables continues et de la régression logistique. Résultats: Le taux de reconstructions mammaires directes a augmenté depuis 2010. Dans la cohorte de 4 204 patients de 2017 à 2019, le taux de complications chirurgicales majeures précoces s'élevait à environ 10% (422 patients) et le taux de complications médicales majeures, à 0,83% (35 patients). Selon la modélisation de régression, l'indice de masse corporelle, le tabagisme, l'hypertension, les troubles hémorragiques et la transfusion sanguine intraopératoire sont liés aux complications chirurgicales (P < 0001). Conclusions: Malgré le recours accru aux MDA et l'angiographie au vert d'indocyanine, par rapport aux études antérieures, les complications postopératoires précoces sont demeurées stables. D'autres études devront être réalisées pour évaluer les complications à long terme et les résultats cliniques déclarés par les patientes après une reconstruction mammaire immédiate.

A Comparative Study of Harmonic Scalpel Versus Electrocautery Dissection in Modified Radical Mastectomy in Breast Carcinoma Cases.

AIM: This study aimed to compare the outcomes of modified radical mastectomy (MRM) with the use of a harmonic scalpel versus electrocautery in patients with breast carcinoma. METHODOLOGY: A prospective, non-randomized comparative study conducted from August 2022 to June 2024 on 40 female patients with stage II breast carcinoma undergoing MRM with electrocautery and harmonic scalpel. RESULTS: Patients with MRM by harmonic scalpel exhibited significantly lower intraoperative blood loss (92.50 ± 9.67 mL) than by electrocautery (172.50 ± 30.76 mL) (p-value <.0001). The average operative time was significantly shorter for the harmonic scalpel (111.00 ± 10.71 minutes) than for the electrocautery (169.50 ± 19.32 minutes) (p-value <.0001). Postoperative pain was lower for the harmonic scalpel (visual analog scale (VAS) score 3.75 ± 0.79) than for the electrocautery (VAS score 6.10 ± 0.85) (p-value <.0001). The incidence of flap necrosis was not substantially different between the categories; seroma formation was significantly lower with the use of a harmonic scalpel (p-value <.0001). Subjects in the group of harmonic scalpels also had shorter hospital stays (8.35 ± 0.93 days) compared with the electrocautery group (12.20 ± 1.06 days) (p-value <.0001).

Evaluation of quality of life and socio-emotional impact of oncological treatment among patients with breast cancer.

Breast cancer is the most frequent cancer in women worldwide. Quality of life (QoL) is significantly affected by both surgical and oncological treatment. The aim of this study was to assess and compare QoL, resilience and depression scores among women who had breast cancer treatment. We assessed 170 patients diagnosed with breast cancer in a non-experimental, descriptive study through anonymized questionnaires from January to March 2024. Patients were invited to fill in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Breast Cancer Module (EORTC QLQ-BR23) questionnaire, the Depression Anxiety Stress Scale, the CD-RISC 10 questionnaire, and the MOS Social Support Survey. Clinical information and demographical data were obtained and statistical analysis was conducted to evaluate factors that affect QoL, resilience and depression scores. QoL was significantly influenced by chemotherapy and surgery. Women with higher resilience scores had lower anxiety and depression scores and reported a better QoL. Women with strong social support and high resilience reported a better QoL during and after breast cancer treatment. The results of our study show that breast cancer surgery and chemotherapy have an important impact on patients' QoL. Moreover, the results reflect the importance of both medical treatment and social support as resilience-building strategies in managing and improving the QoL of patients.

Perioperative Analgesic Effect of Serratus Anterior Plane Block for Breast Surgery: A Randomized Control Study at a Large Teaching Hospital in Ghana.

Background Pain after breast surgery has been described as moderate to severe in intensity and, if inadequately treated, increases postoperative morbidity, hospital cost, and the incidence of persistent postoperative pain. Serratus anterior plane (SAP) block is an interfascial injection technique for analgesia of the chest wall. There is a lack of data with regard to its analgesic and possible opioid-sparing effects in Sub-Saharan Africa. This study aimed to determine the perioperative analgesic effect of serratus anterior plane block administered for breast surgery. Methods This was a prospective, randomized, double-blinded study involving 52 patients and was randomized into the intervention (n = 26) and control (n = 26) groups. One patient in the control group did not receive the allocated intervention, while one in the intervention group lost to follow-up. Complete data of 50 participants, comprising intervention (n=25), was used in the analysis. Patients' demographic and health characteristics, pre-induction, intra-operative, and postoperative hemodynamic parameters were noted. After induction of anesthesia, a blinded anesthetist performed an ultrasound-guided serratus anterior plane block with 0.25% plain bupivacaine or a sham block using 0.9% normal saline (control). Numerical rating scale (NRS) score and incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) were recorded immediately after surgery and at 1, 4, 8, and 24 postoperative hours. Patient satisfaction with analgesic management within the first 24 postoperative hours was also assessed. Results Patients who received SAP block had lower NRS scores at all measured time points, but this was only statistically significant at the fourth postoperative hour (p-value = 0.002). Compared to controls, patients who received SAP had lower intraoperative (11.3±1.5 mg vs. 11.9±1.5 mg, p value = 0.131) and postoperative (4.6±5.7mg vs. 10.5±6 mg, p value=0.001) mean opioid consumption. However, only the reduction in postoperative opioid consumption was found to be statistically significant. Most participants (> 90%) in this study did not experience PONV and were very satisfied with their postoperative pain management. Conclusion Serratus anterior plane block reduces NRS pain scores postoperatively. It also significantly reduces postoperative opioid consumption but does not significantly reduce intraoperative opioid consumption.

Contemporary Review of the Management and Treatment of Young Breast Cancer Patients.

Approximately 11% of all new breast cancer cases annually are diagnosed in young women, and this continues to be the leading cause of death in women age 20 to 49. Young, premenopausal breast cancer patients present with more advanced stages and with a higher proportion of aggressive subtypes such as triple negative and HER2-enriched tumors. Recently, the United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) lowered the age threshold to initiate screening mammograms to age 40 to aid in earlier detection. Young age at diagnosis increases the likelihood for a pathogenic mutation, and genetic testing is recommended for all patients age 50 and younger. This population is often underrepresented in landmark clinical trials, and data is extrapolated for the treatment of young women with breast cancer. Despite there being no survival benefit to more extensive surgical treatments, such as mastectomy or contralateral prophylactic mastectomy, many patients opt against breast conservation. Young patients with breast cancer face issues related to treatment toxicities, potential overtreatment of their disease, mental health, sexual health, and fertility preservation. This unique population requires a multidisciplinary care team of physicians, surgeons, genetic counselors, fertility specialists, mental health professionals, physical therapists, and dieticians to provide individualized, comprehensive care. Our aim is to (1) provide a narrative review of retrospective studies, relevant society guidelines, and clinical trials focused on the contemporary treatment and management of YBC patients and (2) discuss important nuances in their care as a guide for members of their multidisciplinary treatment team.

Use of SPY angiography in tissue assessment for wound healing outcomes after breast reconstruction.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate whether a systematic image assessment protocol using SPY Elite images (LifeCell Corp., US) of viable tissue at the periphery of the surgical field was associated with positive wound healing outcomes following mastectomy and breast reconstruction. METHOD: Patients undergoing mastectomy and subsequent breast reconstruction surgery at a single tertiary medical centre were included. SPY images were prospectively analysed using a systematic image assessment protocol, and an absolute value of mean fluorescence was calculated by measuring peripheral, in-situ tissue from each image. Patient medical records were retrospectively reviewed for demographics, surgical characteristics and postoperative outcomes. These variables were statistically tested for associations with mean fluorescence. RESULTS: A total of 63 patients were included in the final analysis. We found that objectively determined mean fluorescence values were not statistically significantly associated with postoperative complications. CONCLUSION: In this study, objectively measured mean fluorescence values representing breast tissue remaining after dissection showed little utility in the assessment of postoperative wound healing outcomes as they did not identify patients who would later have complications of wound healing. DECLARATION OF INTEREST: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Breast-conserving surgery versus modified radical mastectomy in T1-2N3M0 stage breast cancer: a propensity score matching analysis.

PURPOSE: Breast-conserving surgery (BCS) plus radiotherapy and mastectomy exhibit highly comparable prognoses for early-stage breast cancer; however, the safety of BCS for T1-2N3M0 breast cancer remains unclear. This study compared long-term survival for BCS versus (vs.) modified radical mastectomy (MRM) among patients with T1-2N3M0 breast cancer. METHODS: Data of patients with T1-2N3M0 breast cancer were extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. Eligible patients were divided into 2 groups, BCS and MRM; Pearson's chi-squared test was used to estimate differences in clinicopathological features. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to balance baseline characteristics. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to investigate the effects of surgical methods and other factors on breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: In total, 2124 patients were included; after PSM, 596 patients were allocated to each group. BCS exhibited the same 5-year BCSS (77.9% vs. 77.7%; P = 0.814) and OS (76.1% vs. 74.6%; P = 0.862) as MRM in the matched cohorts. Multivariate survival analysis revealed that BCS had the same BCSS and OS as MRM (hazard ratios [HR] 0.899 [95% confidence intervals (CI) 0.697-1.160], P = 0.413 and HR 0.858 [95% CI 0.675-1.089], P = 0.208, respectively); this was also seen in most subgroups. BCS demonstrated better BCSS (HR 0.558 [95% CI 0.335-0.929]; P = 0.025) and OS (HR 0.605 [95% CI 0.377-0.972]; P = 0.038) than MRM in those with the triple-negative subtype. CONCLUSIONS: BCS has the same long-term survival as MRM in T1-2N3M0 breast cancer and may be a better choice for triple-negative breast cancer.

Nodal Surgery for Patients ≥ 70 Undergoing Mastectomy for DCIS? Choose Wisely.

BACKGROUND: Routine sentinel lymphadenectomy (SLNB) for early-stage HR+/HER2- breast cancer in women ≥70 is discouraged by Choosing Wisely, but whether SLNB can be routinely omitted in women ≥70 with DCIS undergoing mastectomy is unclear. This study aims to evaluate rates of axillary surgery and nodal positivity (pN+) in this population to determine the impact of axillary surgery on treatment decisions. METHODS: Females ≥70 with DCIS undergoing mastectomy were identified from the National Cancer Database (2012-2020). The rate of upstaging to invasive cancer (≥pT1) or pN+ was assessed. Subset analyses were conducted for ER+ patients. Adjuvant therapies were evaluated among ≥pT1 patients after stratifying by nodal status. RESULTS: Of 9,030 patients, 1,896 (21%) upstaged to ≥pT1. Axillary surgery was performed in 86% of patients, predominantly sentinel lymphadenectomy (SLNB, 65%). Post hoc application of Choosing Wisely criteria demonstrated that 93% of the entire cohort and 97% of ER+ DCIS patients could have avoided axillary surgery. Nodal positivity was 0.3% among those who didn't upstage, and 12% among those upstaging to ≥pT1, with <2% having pN2-3 disease, irrespective of receptor subtype. Node-positive patients had higher adjuvant therapy usage, but there was no recommendation for adjuvant chemotherapy or radiation for 71% and 66% of pN+ patients, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Axillary surgery can be omitted for most patients ≥70 undergoing mastectomy for ER+ DCIS, aligning with recommendations for invasive cancer, and omission can be considered in those with ER- disease. Future guidelines incorporating preoperative imaging, as in the SOUND trial, may aid in identifying patients benefiting from axillary surgery.

Demographics and Clinical Decision Making in Patients with Germline Moderate Penetrance Non-BRCA Mutations in Breast Cancer Related Genes.

BACKGROUND: Management of pathogenic variants in high penetrance genes related to breast cancer (BC), such as BRCA1 and BRCA2, are well established. However, moderate penetrance mutations are understudied. We aim to compare risk reduction decision-making patterns in patients with a moderate penetrance BC-related genetic mutations, without a prior BC diagnosis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Female patients aged ≥ 18 years who tested positive for a BRCA1/2, high penetrance, or moderate penetrance mutation related to BC between 1996 and 2023 without a concurrent or prior BC diagnosis were retrospectively identified from a single academic center's database. Groups were stratified by mutation type: BRCA1/2 mutations (BRCA1, BRCA2), high penetrance mutations (HPM; CDH1, PALB2, PTEN, STK11, TP53), or moderate penetrance mutations (MPM; ATM, BARD1, CHEK2, NF1, RAD51C, RAD51D). Demographics and clinical outcomes were compared. RESULTS: A total of 528 patients met the inclusion criteria, with 66% (n = 350) having a BRCA1/2 mutation, 8% (n = 44) having HPM, and 25% (n = 134) having MPM; the median follow-up was 56.0 months. In our cohort, 20.9% of patients with BRCA mutations, 9.1% with HPM, and 7.5% with MPM chose to undergo risk-reducing mastectomies (RRM). Within the moderate penetrance cohort, patients who chose to undergo RRM were younger at the time of genetic testing (39.4 vs. 47.5 years, p = 0.03) and had a higher number of family members with BC (2 vs. 1, p = 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings provide insights into the demographic characteristics and family history of patients with moderate penetrance mutations and those who pursue risk-reducing surgery.

Molecular subtype and risk of local recurrence after nipple­sparing mastectomy for breast cancer.

The present study aimed to investigate whether local recurrence (LR) after nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) and reconstruction was associated with i) Ki67 values and molecular subtypes of the initial lesions, and ii) the size of the initial tumor and the size of the implant. A total of 156 patients with breast cancer with a mean age of 51.58 years (age range, 26-75 years) who underwent NSM with primary implant breast reconstruction were analyzed. After surgery, the mean follow-up time was 59.26 months (range, 17-85 months). Molecular subtypes, Ki67 values, estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) status were recorded for each patient. Additionally, information regarding the size of the implant and the initial tumor size were collected. The information was used to assess LR. For univariate analyses of risk factors, χ2 test, Fisher's exact test, Mann-Whitney U test and Student's t-test for independent samples were used. For multivariate analyses, a Cox proportional-hazards model was used. NSM was the primary treatment for breast cancer in 34/156 patients (21.8%), while 122/156 (78.2%) of patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery. Luminal B was the most frequent molecular subtype, detected in 82/156 patients (52.6%), whereas the luminal A subtype was detected in 37 patients (23.7%) and the HER2-enriched subtype was detected in 17/156 patients (10.9%). Ki67 expression was low in 13/156 patients (8.3%), while medium expression was detected in 78/156 patients (50.0%) and high expression was present in 58/156 patients (37.2%). LR was noted in 17/156 patients (10.9%). As determined by univariate analysis, lower ER (P=0.010) and PR (P=0.008) expression were indicated to be significant risk factors for LR. In conclusion, in the present patient cohort, low ER and PR expression were risk factors for LR of breast cancer, whereas Ki67 status and molecular subtype were not statistically significant risk factors for LR. Additionally, the size of the initial tumor and the size of the implant were not risk factors for LR. These findings are consistent with the current literature, and should be utilized when discussing treatment options and potential clinical outcomes with patients prior to surgical management.

Impact of Mastectomy Flap Necrosis on Patient-Reported Quality-of-Life Measures After Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy: A Preliminary Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Mastectomy skin flap necrosis (SFN) is common following nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM), but studies on its quality-of-life (QOL) impact are limited. We examined patient-reported QOL and satisfaction after NSM with/without SFN utilizing the BREAST-Q patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) survey. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients undergoing NSM between April 2018 and July 2021 at our institution were examined; the BREAST-Q PROM was administered preoperatively, and at 6 months and 1 year postoperatively. SFN extent/severity was documented at 2-3 weeks postoperatively; QOL and satisfaction domains were compared between patients with/without SFN. RESULTS: A total of 573 NSMs in 333 patients were included, and 135 breasts in 82 patients developed SFN (24% superficial, 56% partial thickness, 16% full thickness). Patients with SFN reported significantly lower scores in the satisfaction with breasts (p = 0.032) and psychosocial QOL domains (p = 0.009) at 6 months versus those without SFN, with scores returning to baseline at 1 year in both domains. In the "physical well-being-of-the-chest" domain, there was an overall decline in scores among all patients; however, there were no significant differences at any time point between patients with or without SFN. Sexual well-being scores declined for patients with SFN compared with those without at 6 months and also at 1 year, but this did not reach significance (p = 0.13, p = 0.2, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Patients undergoing NSM who developed SFN reported significantly lower satisfaction and psychosocial well-being scores at 6 months, which returned to baseline by 1 year. Physical well-being of the chest significantly declines after NSM regardless of SFN. Future studies with larger sample sizes and longer follow-up are needed to determine SFN's impact on long-term QOL.

A Rapid Point-of-care Fluorescence Imaging Device Helps Prevent Graft Rejection Post Modified Radical Mastectomy.

Pathogenic bacteria in wounds impede successful skin grafting. However, their detection relies on culture methods, which delay confirmation by several days. Real-time fluorescence imaging detects bacteria, allowing for rapid assessment and documentation. We herein report a post modified radical mastectomy, surgical site infection with multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas spp. that underwent repeated antibiotic therapy and debridement and eventually grafting. In this case, a real-time fluorescence imaging device helped prevent graft rejection.

A randomised comparative study of erector spinae plane block versus low-dose ketamine-dexmedetomidine intravenous infusion as intraoperative opioid-free analgesia for modified radical mastectomy.

Background and Aims: Opioid-sparing analgesia for acute postoperative pain after breast cancer surgery is crucial due to opioid-related side effects. The utilisation of erector spinae plane block and low-dose intravenous ketamine-dexmedetomidine are widely recognised as non-opioid analgesic methodologies. The objective of this study was to conduct a randomised trial to examine the analgesic efficacy of both approaches while minimising the use of opioids. Methods: Seventy-two female patients scheduled for unilateral modified radical mastectomy were recruited. They were allocated randomly to Group ESPB, which received ipsilateral ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block by 20 mL bupivacaine 0.5% at the level of T5 after induction of general anaesthesia, and Group Ket-Dex, which received intravenous (IV) bolus 0.25 mg/kg of ketamine and 0.5 µg/kg of dexmedetomidine, followed by an IV infusion of 0.25 mg/kg of ketamine and 0.3 µg/kg of dexmedetomidine per hour. Total postoperative morphine consumption (24 h) was the primary outcome. The secondary outcomes were pain scores over 24 hours during rest, duration of analgesia, isoflurane consumption, time to awakening, postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), and postoperative serum cortisol level. Results: The postoperative morphine consumption over 24-hour in Group ESPB was 3.26 mg (0-6.74) versus 2.35 mg (2.08-4.88) in Group Ket-Dex (P = 0.046). Group Ket-Dex had lower pain scores at rest, longer analgesia duration, longer awakening time, and lower postoperative serum cortisol levels. Conclusion: Intravenous low-dose ketamine-dexmedetomidine infusion intraoperatively with inhalational-based general anaesthesia provides superior opioid-sparing analgesia to that of ESPB in patients undergoing unilateral non-reconstructive modified radical mastectomy, with less postoperative opioid consumption and stress response.