Treatment of an Intracranial Fusiform Vertebral Aneurysm Using the MVP® Micro Vascular Plug System as an Adjunct to Pipeline(TM) Embolization: Technical Case Instruction.

Fusiform and dolichoectatic aneurysms pose unique challenges in treatment, often requiring alternative approaches compared to saccular aneurysms. Microsurgical options like clipping or a bypass can be difficult, leading to the advancement of endovascular techniques. Flow-diverting stents and vessel sacrifice with detachable coils have shown efficacy in reconstruction. The MVP® Micro Vascular Plug System (Medtronic, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA) offers a resheathable plug for vessel occlusion through electrolytic detachment. This case report illustrates the supplementary application of MVP® subsequent to flow diverter (FD) stenting, resulting in the effective endovascular management of a fusiform aneurysm affecting both vertebral arteries (VA), following unsuccessful coil vessel sacrifice treatment. A 61-year-old female presented with an unruptured fusiform aneurysm in the bilateral vertebral arteries (VAs). Treatment included a flow diverter in the right VA and vessel sacrifice in the left VA using Onyx-18 and coils. Despite initial success, left V4 segment recanalization occurred. Endovascular treatment, deploying two devices and additional coils using the MVP®, halted the flow. Follow-up showed left VA occlusion and reconstruction of the treated right VA, with the patient being discharged without deficits. This case demonstrates a unique approach using MVP® alongside a flow diverter (a PipelineTM Embolization Device (PED), Medtronic) for the treatment of a V4 segment fusiform aneurysm. This innovative technique is an alternative when conventional coil embolization for vessel sacrifice fails. The MVP®'s ease of use and precise delivery render it a feasible and efficacious alternative for treating complex aneurysms.

Iatrogenic pulmonary artery perforation associated with 5-Fr catheter manipulation during pulmonary arteriovenous malformation embolization with a vascular plug.

Vascular plugs have been increasingly used because they have lower recanalization rates than coil embolization in pulmonary arteriovenous malformation (PAVM) embolization. To deliver the vascular plug close to the PAVM, a large-diameter catheter should be advanced into the feeding pulmonary artery, which carries a risk of vascular damage. Fifty-three-year-old women was admitted to our hospital for embolization of a single PAVM. Pulmonary angiography revealed a simple PAVM with a tortuous, small feeding artery in the right middle lobe, and feeding artery negotiation was attempted using a 5-Fr headhunter-type catheter to deliver the vascular plug. However, unintentional arterial perforation occurred suddenly when the guide wire was withdrawn after the catheter was advanced to the feeding artery adjacent to the sac. Immediate embolization using a vascular plug and microcoils at the proximal site of the perforation was performed to stop both PAVM shunt flow and bleeding. To prevent such a catheter-induced complication, it is necessary to select a diagnostic catheter with appropriate stiffness and angle and to switch to a small-diameter delivery system depending on the situation.