[Treatment of hypoxia-induced ED in high-altitude areas by transcutaneous low-frequency electrical stimulation based on the parameters obtained from visualized precision electrophysiological diagnosis].

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effects of visualized precision electrophysiological diagnosis and transcutaneous low-frequency electrical stimulation (TES) on hypoxia-induced ED in high-altitude areas. METHODS: This study included 152 ED patients from high-altitude hypoxic areas treated by TES based on the parameters obtained from visualized precision electrophysiological diagnosis. We followed up the patients for 1 to 3 months and compared their IIEF-5 scores, nocturnal penile tumescence and rigidity (NPTR) and infrared thermal metabolic technology (TMT)-based temperature of the whole body and diseased parts before and after treatment. RESULTS: All the patients successfully completed 1 to 3 courses of TES. There were no statistically significant differences in the IIEF-5 scores (P<0.05) and penile tip optimal erection rigidity and duration (P<0.01) of the patients before and after treatment. TMT images indicated a temperature change of >1.5 ℃ in the penis and bilateral inguinal regions after treatment, suggesting the effectiveness of electrical stimulation. No recurrence was observed during the follow-up. CONCLUSION: TES based on the parameters obtained from visualized precision electrophysiological diagnosis has a definite effect on hypoxia-induced ED by enhancing oxygen supply to the penile corpus cavernosum and improving its function and structure.

The indicative effects of apolipoproteins on organic erectile dysfunction: bridging Mendelian randomization and case-control study.

The existing research on the association between apolipoproteins (Apos) and erectile dysfunction (ED) primarily relies on observational studies and does not distinguish between organic and psychogenic causes when diagnosing ED. It is difficult to believe that Apos play a role in psychogenic ED. To address these issues, our study explored the causal relationship between lipoproteins and ED using Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis and differentiate between organic and psychogenic ED through the use of nocturnal penile tumescence and rigidity (NPTR) monitoring. Multivariate MR analysis revealed significant causal associations between high-density lipoprotein (HDL), Apo A1, and Apo B/A1 with ED (OR and 95% CI were 0.33 (0.14-0.78), 3.58 (1.52-8.43), and 0.30 (0.13-0.66)). we conducted statistical and analytical analyses on the data of 212 patients using multivariate analyses and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Patients with organic ED had significantly lower levels of HDL, Apo A1 and Apo A1/B, whereas patients with organic ED had considerably higher levels of Apo B and low-density lipoprotein (LDL). The diagnostic value of Apos in predicting the risk of organic ED was evaluated using ROC curves. The results indicated that Apo A1 and Apo A1/B demonstrated good predictive value. HDL, Apo A1, and Apo A1/B have been identified as risk factors for ED in our study. Furthermore, our research highlights the significance of Apo A1 and Apo A1/Apo B in the development of organic ED and suggests their potential use as indicators to assess the risks associated with organic ED.

More Efficient Approach: Independent Diagnostic Value of Audiovisual Sexual Stimulation for Psychogenic Erectile Dysfunction.

The diagnostic value of audiovisual sexual stimulation (AVSS) for psychogenic erectile dysfunction (ED) is still unclear. We investigated the independent diagnostic value and optimal cut-off parameter of AVSS for psychogenic ED. All participants had received the AVSS test and nocturnal penile tumescence and rigidity (NPTR) monitoring at least twice. ED patients were divided into psychogenic ED and organic ED according to NPTR examination. The diagnostic accuracy of AVSS parameters was evaluated with the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, and the Youden index was employed to determine the optimal diagnostic cut-off values. A total of 346 patients with ED and 60 healthy men were included in this study, among which 162 and 184 cases of psychogenic and organic ED were identified based on NPTR, respectively. When comparing the two ED groups, the area under the curve (AUC) of AVSS parameters was 0.85-0.89. Six-selected AVSS parameters could precisely diagnose psychogenic ED, exhibiting increased diagnostic specificity compared with corresponding sensitivity. When comparing psychogenic ED with the control group, the AUC of the tumescence of the tip was superior to the AUC other parameters (0.81 vs. 0.58, 0.66, 0.59, 0.53, 0.68), and the best determined diagnostic cut-off value was the tumescence of the tip < 29.87%. Independent AVSS could diagnose psychogenic ED objectively and effectively, and its diagnostic value was highest when 1.50% ≤ tumescence of the tip < 29.87%.

Penile Fracture following Penile Manipulation during Nocturnal Penile Tumescence - A Case Report.

Penile fracture is a rare urological emergency typically caused by vigorous sexual intercourse, masturbation, and trauma. Only very few cases with a non-coital etiology or trauma have been reported in the literature. While cases of penile fracture resulting from the manipulation of the erect penis during masturbation have been reported in the Middle East, we report here a rare case of a penile fracture as a result of manipulation of the turgid penis during nocturnal penile tumescence. Following penile manipulation during nocturnal penile tumescence, our patient presented with persistent penile pain, progressive penile swelling, and penile deformity. Immediate surgical management was carried out with excellent outcomes. The diagnosis of the case with the specifics of the intraoperative findings and the surgical procedure are presented in this report. Our goal is to emphasize that non-coital-related penile fractures can occur and should be recognised to prompt early diagnosis and prompt treatment to avoid complications.

La fracture du pénis est une urgence urologique rare, typiquement causée par des rapports sexuels vigoureux, la masturbation et les traumatismes. Seuls quelques cas d'étiologie non coïtale ou de traumatisme ont été rapportés dans la littérature. Alors que des cas de fracture du pénis résultant de la manipulation du pénis en érection pendant la masturbation ont été rapportés au Moyen-Orient, nous rapportons ici un cas rare de fracture du pénis résultant de la manipulation du pénis turgescent pendant la tumescence nocturne du pénis. Suite à la manipulation du pénis pendant la tumescence nocturne, nos patient ont présenté une douleur persistante au niveau du pénis, un gonflement progressif du pénis et une déformation du pénis. Une intervention chirurgicale immédiate a été réalisée avec d'excellents résultats. Le diagnostic de ce cas, ainsi que les détails des résultats peropératoires et de la procédure chirurgicale sont présentés dans ce rapport. Notre objectif est de souligner que les fractures du pénis non liées à l'acte sexuel peuvent se produire et doivent être reconnues pour un diagnostic et un traitement précoces afin d'éviter les complications. Mots-clés: Fracture du pénis, Tumescence nocturne du pénis, Manipulation du pénis, Masturbation.

Wearable Soft Microtube Sensors for Quantitative Home-Based Erectile Dysfunction Monitoring.

Quantifiable erectile dysfunction (ED) diagnosis involves the monitoring of rigidity and tumescence of the penile shaft during nocturnal penile tumescence (NPT). In this work, we introduce Erectile Dysfunction SENsor (EDSEN), a home-based wearable device for quantitative penile health monitoring based on stretchable microtubular sensing technology. Two types of sensors, the T- and R-sensors, are developed to effectively measure penile tumescence and rigidity, respectively. Conical models mimicking penile shaft were fabricated with polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) material, using different base to curing agent ratios to replicate the different hardness properties of a penile shaft. A theoretical buckling force chart for the different penile models is generated to determine sufficiency criteria for sexual intercourse. An average erect penile length and circumference requires at least a Young's modulus of 179 kPa for optimal buckling force required for satisfactory sexual intercourse. The conical penile models were evaluated using EDSEN. Our results verified that the circumference of a penile shaft can be accurately measured by T-sensor and rigidity using the R-sensor. EDSEN provides a private and quantitative method to detect ED within the comfortable confines of the user's home.

The relationship between serum 25-hydroxy vitamin D and arteriogenic erectile dysfunction.

This study aimed to assess the relationship between 25(OH) levels and erectile dysfunction (ED), particularly arteriogenic ED (A-ED). From September 2020 to January 2022, 150 patients diagnosed with ED by the International Index of Erectile Function-5 (IIEF-5) questionnaire were included. All patients were classified as organic ED and psychological ED by nocturnal penile tumescence and rigidity (NPTR) examination. Organic ED patients were divided into A-ED and NA-ED by penile doppler ultrasound (PDU) examination. Finally, 150 patients complaining of ED were enrolled in our study. 25(OH)D levels were significantly lower in patients with organic ED (18.24 ± 6.04 ng/ml) than in patients with psychogenic ED (20.90 ± 8.79 ng/ml) (p = 0.032). In A-ED and NA-ED, the mean of peak systolic flow velocity (PSV) values was 18.94 ± 5.28 cm/s and 51.57 ± 15.42 cm/s (p < 0.001), and the mean of 25(OH)D was 15.66 ± 5.86 ng/ml and 20.48 ± 5.90 ng/ml, respectively (p < 0.001). The results showed that 25(OH)D levels were positively correlated with IIEF-5 scores and the PSV values in A-ED patients. The 25(OH)D cut-off value differentiating between A-ED and NA-ED was 15.05 ng/ml. Low 25(OH)D levels may be an independent risk factor for ED, especially A-ED. ED patients should routinely undergo serum 25(OH)D level measurement, and 25(OH)D replacement therapy is necessary for patients with low vitamin D levels.

An objective correlation of specific haematological parameters with ED severity.

This study aims to investigate the role of nocturnal penile tumescence and rigidity (NPTR) and laboratory features in patients with mild, moderate and severe ED and then explored the correlation between ED severity with certain blood count parameters such as WBC and NLR. A total of 86 ED patients (age 29.8 ± 7.09 years) were enrolled. Classification of ED severity according to IIEF-5 scores was as follows: mild ED, 43.02% (37/86); moderate ED, 27.91% (24/86) and severe ED, 29.07% (25/86). Patients with moderate and severe ED had declined IIEF-5 scores and increased GAD-7 and PHQ-9 scores compared with mild ED. The mean NLR value of the mild, moderate and severe ED groups was 1.43 ± 0.39, 1.74 ± 0.45 and 2.0 ± 0.58, respectively. Stratification analysis according to NPTR results indicated that there was a significant difference in WBC and NLR between the two groups. Patients with abnormal NPTR had increased WBC and NLR levels compared with the normal groups. Multivariate logistic regression analysis suggested that severe ED (OR [95% CI]: 5.736 [1.248-26.354]), WBC (OR [95% CI]: 1.676 [1.094-2.567]) and NLR (OR [95% CI]: 5.595 [1.478-21.178]) were identified as independent risk factors for severe ED (abnormal NPTR results). In conclusion, this study indicates a significant difference in NLR, PLR, PDW, MPV and HDL between the mild, moderate and severe ED groups. The WBC and NLR are significantly increased in patients with severe ED (abnormal NPTR results) and it can be available as a quick, easy and cheap investigation compared with the RigiScan to evaluate the severity of ED with good sensitivity and specificity, which is important for the diagnosis and evaluation of ED.

Selecting an Individualized Treatment Approach: The Predictive Value of Erotic Stimulation and Nocturnal Erections for Efficacy of Tadalafil and Cure in Patients With Erectile Dysfunction.

Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate two modes of Rigiscan for predicting tadalafil response, and to identify which Rigiscan variables are the most efficient at making these predictions. Methods: All patients received at least two rounds of nocturnal penile tumescence and rigidity (NPTR) testing and/or audiovisual sexual stimulation (AVSS), then completed the International Index of Erectile Function-5 (IIEF-5) questionnaire, followed by oral 5 mg tadalafil daily for 4 weeks. After a 4-week washout period, all respondents underwent an the IIEF-5 questionnaire again. ED patients were then categorized into tadalafil responders and tadalafil non-responders, who were then further divided into cured patients and uncured patients. Results: When predicting tadalafil responders, the area under the curve (AUC) of NPTR was superior to that of AVSS (0.68~0.84 VS 0.69~0.73), and the predicted optimal cut-off values were DOEE60≥17.75 min in NPTR, compared to other parameters regardless of AVSS or NPTR (P<0.05). When predicting which patients would be cured, the AUC of AVSS was superior to NPTR parameters (0.77~0.81 vs 0.61~0.76), and the determined best diagnostic cut-off values were DOEE≥4.125min in AVSS, compared to other parameters regardless of AVSS or NPTR (P < 0.05). Conclusion: Rigiscan was able to predict the efficacy of daily tadalafil accurately and efficiently. Its diagnostic value was at maximum when DOEE60 ≥17.75 min of NPTR in tadalafil responders and DOEE ≥ 4.125 min of AVSS in cured patients.

[Monitoring of nocturnal penile tumescence in healthy volunteers by the Androscan MIT registrar to establish reliable normal physiological values in a multicenter study].

AIM: To evaluate the normal numerical and graphic values of nocturnal penile tumescence (NPT) test using Androscan MIT in healthy males in order to use the collected data as reference standard. MATERIALS AND METHODS: NPT monitoring was carried out in 38 healthy male volunteers by fixing a sensor designed for 20 measurements on their penis. During the NPT test the following parameters were recorded: 1) total sleep time; 2) minimal penis diameter (PD) in the flaccid state recorded by the apparatus; 3) maximum PD during effective penile tumescence; 4) absolute PD increase during effective erections; 5) increase in PD in %; 6) the overall time of the rigid-erection phase; 7) the number of penile rigidity episodes; 8) the average duration of each effective erection; 9) the percentage of rigid erections during the whole monitoring period. RESULTS: Based on the data collected by Androscan MIT, we have specified the numerical values which characterize normal physiological NPT indices in healthy male volunteers. The number of tests performed and similar inclusion criteria contribute to the objectiveness of the presented data. Normal sleep time was from 7.3 to 9.5 hours. Monitoring during sleeping reflected the upper and lower limits of the minimal PD value recorded by Androscan MIT, which was from 23.5 mm to 30.2 mm. The maximum PD increase during the most effective erection varied from 35.3 mm to 44.3 mm. Total PD increase was from 10.6 mm to 15.4 mm (from 35.6% to 59.2%). In all cases a significant difference in PD increase between flaccid state and effective erection during sleeping was seen. The number of penile rigidity episodes varied from 3 to 7 a night. The overall time of effective erections was from 62.3 to 206.7 minutes, while the minimum duration of a single erection episode was 16.4 minutes and the maximum duration reached 35.8 minutes. The ratio of effective NPT to the total sleep time (the percentage of penile rigidity episodes) varied from 11.9% to 41.3%. CONCLUSION: Our results allowed to define reference qualitative and quantitative values of NPT in healthy male volunteers recorded by Androscan MIT which can be considered as normal and physiological and used for differential diagnostics of erectile dysfunction.

[Clinical application of RigiScan monitoring in the diagnosis and treatment of erectile dysfunction in the plateau area].

OBJECTIVE: To explore the applicability of RigiScan monitoring data in the diagnosis of ED in the plateau area and evaluation of clinical therapeutic effects. METHODS: This study included 586 outpatients and inpatients with ED, aged 18－48 (mean 24.6) years, all confirmed according to the scores on the 5-item version of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5) and subjective description and treated in Xining First People's Hospital. We performed audiovisual sexual stimulation (AVSS) and nocturnal penile tumescence and rigidity (NPTR) tests by RigiScan monitoring and hierarchical diagnosis of those with abnormal AVSS and NPTR findings. After 1 to 6 months of individualized treatment with PDE5i drugs and a month of drug withdrawal and psychological intervention, we repeated the AVSS test and analyzed the data obtained in comparison with the IIEF-5 scores and subjective description of the patients before and after treatment. RESULTS: Of the 586 patients, 3 were found normal and 583 abnormal (without effective erection, i.e., penile tip rigidity <60% and <10 min) in the AVSS test, while the repeated NPTR test showed 57 normal (with effective erection, i.e., penile tip rigidity ≥60% and ≥10 min). A total of 116 patients gave up the NPTR test. Altogether 410 of the cases were found without effective erection in the NPTR test before treatment, 207 (50.5%) with mild ED, 176 (42.9%) with moderate ED and 27 (6.6%) with severe ED. Of the 410 patients, based on the result of the repeated AVSS test after treatment, 255 (62.2%, including 172 cases ï¼»42.0%ï¼½ of mild ED and 83 cases ï¼»20.2%ï¼½ of moderate ED) were shown with effective erection, 124 (30.2%, including 35 cases ï¼»8.5%ï¼½ of mild ED, 77 cases ï¼»18.8%ï¼½ of moderate ED and 12 cases ï¼»2.9%ï¼½ of severe ED) were significantly improved (P < 0.05), and the other 31 (7.6%, including 16 cases ï¼»3.9%ï¼½ of moderate ED and 15 cases ï¼»3.7%ï¼½ of severe ED) remained unchanged. The IIEF -5 score was remarkably increased after treatment compared with the baseline (18.62 ± 2.96 vs 11.62 ± 3.64, P < 0.05), and the erectile function and erection-control ability of the patients, according to their subjective description, were markedly improved after treatment. CONCLUSIONS: RigiScan with AVSS and NPTR tests can objectively assess the severity of ED, screen its causes and evaluate the effects of medication and psychological intervention for patients in plateau areas.

[PDE-5i combined with RigiScan-based audiovisual sexual stimulation test versus nocturnal penile tumescence test in evaluation of erectile function].

OBJECTIVE: To explore the clinical value of phosphodiesterase type-5 inhibitors (PDE-5i) combined with RigiScan-based audiovisual sexual stimulation (AVSS) test in comparison with that of nocturnal penile tumescence (NPT) test in evaluation of erectile function. METHODS: A total of 166 ED patients, aged 21－63 (mean 31) years, with a disease course of 3 months to 10 years (mean 14 months), underwent NPT test or PDE-5i + RigiScan-based AVSS test from 2017 to 2018. We compared the results of the diagnostic strategies. Normal NPT patterns were presumed to indicate psychogenic and abnormal ones to indicate organic ED. RESULTS: Compared with the results of NPT test, no statistically significant difference was observed in the accuracy rate between Viagra + AVSS test and Cialis + AVSS test (P > 0.05). PDE-5i + RigiScan-based AVSS test achieved a sensitivity of 78.9% and a specificity of 90.7% in the diagnosis of psychogenic ED and an overall accuracy rate of 81.9%. According to the results of PDE-5i + RigiScan-based AVSS test, the patients fell into a normal and an abnormal erection group, with significant differences between the two groups in age, disease course, IIEF-5 score and maintenance time of penile tip rigidity ≥60% (P < 0.05). ROC curve analysis indicated that PDE-5i + RigiScan-based AVSS test accurately manifested the erectile function of the patients. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with NPT test, PDE -5i combined with RigiScan-based AVSS test is simple, inexpensive, practical and with a high sensitivity and specificity, and therefore can be used as the first-choice strategy for etiological diagnosis of ED.

Role of RigiScan parameters in differentiation of vascular erectile dysfunction.

Male nocturnal penile tumescence and rigidity assessed by RigiScan monitoring device (GOTOP Inc.) is a noninvasive tool to differentiate organic from psychogenic erectile dysfunction (ED). This study aimed to determine the diagnostic value of RigiScan parameters in differentiating arterial ED from veno-occlusive ED. We recruited 102 male patients (mean ± SD, 32.3 ± 6.7 years old) presented with an overall score <21 in the 5-item version of the International Index of Erectile Function scoring system. Baseline data of the included subjects were collected, and the patients were then subjected to RigiScan monitoring, penile colour Doppler ultrasound, and dynamic infusion cavernosometry and cavernosography examination. These patients were allocated into psychogenic, arterial and venous ED group based on the results of these specific examinations. At last, psychogenic ED was identified in 56 out of 102 men, while arteriogenic ED was identified in 31 cases and venogenic ED in 15 out of the overall 102 cases. The erection episodes per night (1.6 ± 0.5 vs. 2.5 ± 0.9 for venogenic vs. arterial ED respectively) and the duration of tip erections ≥60% in the venogenic ED group (21.5 ± 10.5 min) were significantly lower than cases in arteriogenic ED individuals (34.5 ± 17.0 min). Besides, receiver operating characteristic analysis showed that the duration of tip erections with a cut-off value of 12.5 min had 81.4% sensitivity and 100% specificity for predicting a venogenic ED in cases with organic impotence. In conclusion, the duration of tip erection of RigiScan parameters was used to distinguish venogenic from arterial ED.

Effect of low-intensity extracorporeal shockwave therapy on nocturnal penile tumescence and rigidity and penile haemodynamics.

The study aims to evaluate the effect of low-intensity extracorporeal shockwave therapy (Li-ESWT) on nocturnal erection and penile haemodynamics. Patients with erectile dysfunction (ED) were enrolled from January 2018 to March 2019. Self-reported erectile symptoms, the International Index of Erectile Function-5 (IIEF-5) and Erection Hardness Scores (EHS), nocturnal penile tumescence and rigidity (NPTR) and cavernous duplex Doppler ultrasound (CDDU) were evaluated. NPTR and CDDU were evaluated by Rigiscan and vascular ultrasound system respectively. Comparisons of NPTR and CDDU parameters were performed before and after Li-ESWT (Renova, once a week, 4 weeks in total). A total of 35 cases (mean age 36.51 ± 11.47 years) were enrolled for analysis. The IIEF-5 (10.60 ± 5.99 vs. 15.13 ± 6.22, p = .003), EHS (p = .016) and self-reported erectile hardness (p = .014) were significantly improved after 1-month treatment. Nocturnal erection frequency (p = .010), duration of total erection (p = .017), duration of erectile rigidity ≥60% at penile tip and base (p = .014 and p = .002) and the best erectile rigidity at penile tip and base (p = .012 and p = .005) improved significantly after treatment. However, no CDDU parameters improved after Li-ESWT (all p > .05). Li-ESWT can effectively improve subjective erectile function and nocturnal erection in ED patients. Large sample and well-designed studies need to be developed for supporting the current findings.

Consecutive nightly measurements are needed for accurate evaluation of nocturnal erectile capacity when the first-night laboratory recording is abnormal / 亚洲男科学杂志(英文版)

Multiple measurements of nocturnal penile tumescence and rigidity (NPTR) are widely accepted as a method to differentiate psychogenic erectile dysfunction (ED) from organic ED. However, direct evidence remains limited regarding the first-night effect on NPTR measurement using the RigiScan. Here, we evaluated the first-night effect on the results of NPTR measurement to validate the necessity of NPTR measurement for two consecutive nights, particularly when abnormal first-night measurements are recorded in a laboratory setting. We retrospectively reviewed 105 patients with a complaint of ED, who underwent NPTR measurement using the RigiScan in the Department of Infertility and Sexual Medicine, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University (Guangzhou, China), for two consecutive nights, during the period from November 2015 to May 2016. NPTR parameters were collected and analyzed. We found that more effective nocturnal erections were detected during the second night than during the first night (P <0.001). Twenty percent of all patients had no effective erection during the first night, but exhibited at least one effective erection during the second night. The negative predictive value of NPTR measurement during the first night was 43.2%; this was significantly lower than that on the second night (84.2%; P = 0.003). Most NPTR parameters were better on the second night than on the first night. The first-night effect might be greater among patients younger than 40 years of age. In conclusion, two consecutive nightly measurements of NPTR can avoid a false-abnormal result caused by the first-night effect; moreover, these measurements more accurately reflect erectile capacity, especially when the first-night record is abnormal in a laboratory setting.

Consecutive nightly measurements are needed for accurate evaluation of nocturnal erectile capacity when the first-night laboratory recording is abnormal / 亚洲男科学杂志(英文版)

Multiple measurements of nocturnal penile tumescence and rigidity (NPTR) are widely accepted as a method to differentiate psychogenic erectile dysfunction (ED) from organic ED. However, direct evidence remains limited regarding the first-night effect on NPTR measurement using the RigiScan. Here, we evaluated the first-night effect on the results of NPTR measurement to validate the necessity of NPTR measurement for two consecutive nights, particularly when abnormal first-night measurements are recorded in a laboratory setting. We retrospectively reviewed 105 patients with a complaint of ED, who underwent NPTR measurement using the RigiScan in the Department of Infertility and Sexual Medicine, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University (Guangzhou, China), for two consecutive nights, during the period from November 2015 to May 2016. NPTR parameters were collected and analyzed. We found that more effective nocturnal erections were detected during the second night than during the first night (P <0.001). Twenty percent of all patients had no effective erection during the first night, but exhibited at least one effective erection during the second night. The negative predictive value of NPTR measurement during the first night was 43.2%; this was significantly lower than that on the second night (84.2%; P = 0.003). Most NPTR parameters were better on the second night than on the first night. The first-night effect might be greater among patients younger than 40 years of age. In conclusion, two consecutive nightly measurements of NPTR can avoid a false-abnormal result caused by the first-night effect; moreover, these measurements more accurately reflect erectile capacity, especially when the first-night record is abnormal in a laboratory setting.

Consecutive nightly measurements are needed for accurate evaluation of nocturnal erectile capacity when the first-night laboratory recording is abnormal.

Multiple measurements of nocturnal penile tumescence and rigidity (NPTR) are widely accepted as a method to differentiate psychogenic erectile dysfunction (ED) from organic ED. However, direct evidence remains limited regarding the first-night effect on NPTR measurement using the RigiScan. Here, we evaluated the first-night effect on the results of NPTR measurement to validate the necessity of NPTR measurement for two consecutive nights, particularly when abnormal first-night measurements are recorded in a laboratory setting. We retrospectively reviewed 105 patients with a complaint of ED, who underwent NPTR measurement using the RigiScan in the Department of Infertility and Sexual Medicine, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University (Guangzhou, China), for two consecutive nights, during the period from November 2015 to May 2016. NPTR parameters were collected and analyzed. We found that more effective nocturnal erections were detected during the second night than during the first night (P <0.001). Twenty percent of all patients had no effective erection during the first night, but exhibited at least one effective erection during the second night. The negative predictive value of NPTR measurement during the first night was 43.2%; this was significantly lower than that on the second night (84.2%; P = 0.003). Most NPTR parameters were better on the second night than on the first night. The first-night effect might be greater among patients younger than 40 years of age. In conclusion, two consecutive nightly measurements of NPTR can avoid a false-abnormal result caused by the first-night effect; moreover, these measurements more accurately reflect erectile capacity, especially when the first-night record is abnormal in a laboratory setting.

The Role of Nocturnal Penile Tumescence and Rigidity (NPTR) Monitoring in the Diagnosis of Psychogenic Erectile Dysfunction: A Review.

INTRODUCTION: Nocturnal penile tumescence and rigidity (NPTR) monitoring with RigiScan was considered one of the most reliable methods to differentiate psychogenic erectile dysfunction (pED) from organic ED. However, its reliability has been questioned because of some limitations in the practice. AIM: To present contemporary views on the role of NPTR monitoring in the diagnosis of pED. METHOD: We performed a comprehensive review of English-language literature on NPTR and pED by a PubMed search. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Studies were included if the mechanisms of pED and nocturnal erection and the practice of NPTR monitoring in ED were the main research contents. RESULTS: The pED results from not only psychosocial factors but also physiological changes containing central nervous abnormality. NPTR monitoring with RigiScan is still considered a useful method for the diagnosis of pED. A normal NPTR recording in a man with ED complaints probably suggests pED, whereas an abnormal recording may represent organic ED. Radial rigidity of no more than 60% is correlated well with axial rigidity, but, when it is more than 60%, the correlation between them is questioned. The consistency between NPTR and sex-stimulated erection is questionable, and the correlation of NPTR with different patient-reported outcome scoring systems is different. A normal NPTR recording in patients with ED does not necessarily mean pED, especially in patients with spinal cord injury. NPTR recordings can be influenced by depression, smoking, aging, negative dream content, and sleep disorders. CONCLUSION: NPTR monitoring with the RigiScan is still considered a useful diagnostic tool for pED at the present stage. However, there are some disputes regarding the correlation between penile radial rigidity and axial rigidity and between NPTR and sex-related erection, as well as normative evaluation criteria for ED and the possibility of a false NPTR result, that need to be further studied. Zou Z, Lin H, Zhang Y, et al. The Role of Nocturnal Penile Tumescence and Rigidity (NPTR) Monitoring in the Diagnosis of Psychogenic Erectile Dysfunction: A Review. Sex Med Rev 2019;7:442-454.

[Application of nocturnal penile tumescence test in the diagnosis of erectile dysfunction].

ED is a common male disease, often caused by neurological, vascular or psychological factors, and the diagnostic methods for ED vary widely. The nocturnal penile tumescence test (NPT) by RigiScan is an objective assessment method used mainly to detect ED and has gained a wide clinical application in recent years. This review focuses on the application value of the six RigiScan parameters in the diagnosis of ED, namely, the number of erections, total erection time, event rigidity of tip/base, event tumescence of tip/base, tumescence activated unit and rigidity activated unit, aiming to provide some help to clinicians and researchers with the application of NPT.

Application of nocturnal penile tumescence test in the diagnosis of erectile dysfunction / 中华男科学杂志

ED is a common male disease, often caused by neurological, vascular or psychological factors, and the diagnostic methods for ED vary widely. The nocturnal penile tumescence test (NPT) by RigiScan is an objective assessment method used mainly to detect ED and has gained a wide clinical application in recent years. This review focuses on the application value of the six RigiScan parameters in the diagnosis of ED, namely, the number of erections, total erection time, event rigidity of tip/base, event tumescence of tip/base, tumescence activated unit and rigidity activated unit, aiming to provide some help to clinicians and researchers with the application of NPT.

[Penile erectile strength measurement band for differentiation and classification of erectile dysfunction].

OBJECTIVE: To study the clinical application value of the penile erectile strength measurement (PESM) band in the differentiation of psychogenic from organic erectile dysfunction (ED). METHODS: Eighty ED patients unable to achieve or maintain adequate penile erection to complete sexual intercourse were included in the experimental group and another 40 healthy subjects with normal erectile function enrolled as controls. The ED cases were classified into mild, moderate and severe ED according to the IIEF-5 scores and divided into psychogenic and organic ED based on the results of the nocturnal penile tumescence (NPT) test. Then all the subjects underwent a three-night continuous monitoring with the PESM band and, according to the band fracture rate, the ED cases were also classified into psychogenic and organic ED. The rates of missed diagnosis, misdiagnosis and diagnostic coincidence of PESM were calculated with the results of NPT as the standard for differentiating psychogenic from organic ED. RESULTS: The results of NPT tests revealed 51 cases of psychogenic and 29 cases of organic ED in the experimental group. The band fracture rate in PESM was 95.0% in the mild, 80.9% in the moderate and 52.8% in the severe ED patients. Of the 51 cases of psychogenic ED detected by NPT test, 43 were diagnosed as psychogenic and the other 8 as organic ED with the PESM band, with a coincidence rate of 84.3%. Of the 29 cases of organic ED revealed by NPT test, 5 were diagnosed as psychogenic and the other 24 as organic ED by PESM, with a coincidence rate of 82.8%. Normal erectile function with three-level fracture of the band was observed in the PESM of the normal controls, which showed a coincidence rate of 100% with the results of NPT tests. Based on the standard of the NPT test, the rates of missed diagnosis, misdiagnosis and diagnostic coincidence of the PESM band in differentiating psychogenic from organic ED were 15.7%, 17.2%, and 83.8%, respectively, with a Kappa value of 0.656 (P <0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The penile erectile strength measurement band can be used as a screening tool for initial differentiation of psychogenic from organic ED.