Prognostic efficacy of non-invasive ventilation in patients with overlap syndrome: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and obstructive sleep apnea.

Background: Limited evidence exists regarding the effects of non-invasive ventilation (NIV) on the prognosis of patients with concomitant chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), also known as overlap syndrome (OS). This study aimed to assess whether NIV alongside standard care could improve the prognosis of this cohort. Methods: We retrospectively collected data from 229 patients with severe OS treated in Beijing Anzhen Hospital between January 1, 2016 and January 1, 2020, with follow-up until December 1, 2023. All patients were recommended usual care and NIV and were subsequently divided into non-NIV (usual care only) and NIV groups (usual care plus NIV) per their willingness and adherence to NIV. Endpoints included all-cause and acute exacerbation of COPD (AECOPD)-associated death and re-hospitalization. Multivariate analyses were used to determine the relationship of NIV with prognosis. Results: The follow-up lasted for a median of 760 days (interquartile range, 245-1,374 days). Patients in the NIV group showed lower rates of all-cause (37.5% vs. 65.1%, P<0.001) and AECOPD-associated (31.7% vs. 58.7%, P<0.001) death compared with patients in the non-NIV group. Compared with usual care only, NIV treatment was associated with significant reduction in all-cause death [relative risks (RR) =0.459, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.315-0.668, P<0.001], AECOPD-associated mortality (RR =0.424, 95% CI: 0.283-0.635, P<0.001), and re-hospitalization for all causes (RR =0.455, 95% CI: 0.342-0.605, P<0.001) and for AECOPD (RR =0.421, 95% CI: 0.308-0.575, P<0.001) in Cox hazards models, with significance persisting after multivariable adjustment. Conclusions: NIV may improve outcomes and survival in patients with severe OS of comorbid COPD and OSA. Confirmatory studies are needed to prove benefits.

End of life decision making when home mechanical ventilation is used to sustain breathing in Motor Neurone Disease: patient and family perspectives.

BACKGROUND: Motor Neurone Disease (MND) leads to muscle weakening, affecting movement, speech, and breathing. Home mechanical ventilation, particularly non-invasive ventilation (NIV), is used to alleviate symptoms and support breathing in people living with MND. While home mechanical ventilation can alleviate symptoms and improve survival, it does not slow the progression of MND. This study addresses gaps in understanding end-of-life decision-making in those dependent on home mechanical ventilation, considering the perspectives of patients, family members, and bereaved families. METHODS: A UK-wide qualitative study using flexible interviews to explore the experiences of people living with MND (n = 16), their family members (n = 10), and bereaved family members (n = 36) about the use of home mechanical ventilation at the end of life. RESULTS: Some participants expressed a reluctance to discuss end-of-life decisions, often framed as a desire to "live for the day" due to the considerable uncertainty faced by those with MND. Participants who avoided end-of-life discussions often engaged in 'selective decision-making' related to personal planning, involving practical and emotional preparations. Many faced challenges in hypothesising about future decisions given the unpredictability of the disease, opting to make 'timely decisions' as and when needed. For those who became dependent on ventilation and did not want to discuss end of life, decisions were often 'defaulted' to others, especially once capacity was lost. 'Proactive decisions', including advance care planning and withdrawal of treatment, were found to empower some patients, providing a sense of control over the timing of their death. A significant proportion lacked a clear understanding of the dying process and available options. CONCLUSIONS: The study highlights the complexity and evolution of decision-making, often influenced by the dynamic and uncertain nature of MND. The study emphasises the need for a nuanced understanding of decision-making in the context of MND.

A comparison of two weaning strategies for non-invasive ventilation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients with acute respiratory failure.

INTRODUCTION: Non-Invasive Ventilation (NIV) is a crucial therapy for managing acute exacerbations of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) with hypercapnic respiratory failure. Research has shown that NIV can decrease the rate of endotracheal intubation, length of hospital and Intensive Care Unit stays, and mortality. There are three main strategies for weaning patients off NIV: gradual reduction of NIV duration, gradual reduction of NIV pressure support, and immediate cessation of NIV. AIM: To compare the rate of successful withdrawal of COPD patients with acute hypercapnic respiratory failure, one group will use a stepwise reduction of duration of NIV, while the other group will use a stepwise reduction of pressure support. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was a prospective observational study conducted at the Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Institute of Chest Diseases, Government Medical College, Kozhikode, over a period of 15 months. The study population consisted of all COPD patients admitted to the Pulmonary Medicine ward or ICU with acute hypercapnic respiratory failure who were managed with non-invasive ventilation (NIV) without the need for invasive mechanical ventilation. Exclusions included patients requiring NIV for respiratory diseases other than COPD, those with significant comorbidities like acute left ventricular failure or fluid overload states as in chronic kidney disease, COVID-19 positive patients, patients on home NIV, patients who needed intubation early in treatment, and patients unwilling to participate in the study. The sample size was 140. Initial NIV settings and other management decisions prior to enrolment in the study were made by the treating physician according to standard protocols. Once weaning criteria were met (i.e., arterial pH > 7.35, SpO2 ≥ 90% at an FiO2 ≤ 50%, respiratory rate ≤ 25 breaths per minute, heart rate ≤ 120 beats per minute, systolic BP > 90 mm Hg, and no signs of respiratory distress), patients were assigned to either group 1 or group 2 by purposive sampling. Group 1: stepwise reduction of duration of NIV use, with a reduction to 16 h per day on day 1 of enrolment, 12 h on day 2 (including 6-8 h of nocturnal NIV), 6-8 h on day 3, and NIV withdrawal on day 4. Group 2: stepwise reduction of pressure support, with pressure support reduced by 2-4 cm every 4-6 h until Inspiratory Positive Airway Pressure is < 8 cm H2O and Expiratory Positive Airway Pressure is < 4 cm H2O, followed by NIV withdrawal. The clinical outcome was classified as either improved or weaning failure. Improved was defined as an objective or subjective sense of improvement. Weaning failure was defined as the presence of any of the following: respiratory rate ≥ 25/minute or increase of ≥ 50% from baseline, heart rate ≥ 140/minute or increase of ≥ 20% from baseline, SpO2 ≤ 90% on FiO2 ≥ 50%, arterial pH ≤ 7.35, or respiratory distress. Data was collected using a pro forma that included demographic details, smoking status, GOLD COPD category, comorbidities, and vital signs. ABG parameters, NIV settings at the time of hospital admission, at the time of study enrolment, and 48 h after weaning were also recorded. Independent sample t-test was used to test the statistical significance of the difference between means of variables between the two groups. Pearson Chi square test and Fisher's exact test were used to compare categorical variables between the groups. A p-value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: NIV was successfully withdrawn in 56/70 (80%) and 50/70 (71.4%) patients in Groups 1 and 2, respectively. This difference was not statistically significant. The length of hospital stay was longer in the stepwise reduction of duration group (Group 1), but this was not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: On comparison of two methods of NIV withdrawal, it was found that neither method is superior to the other in terms of weaning failure, intubation rates, and average length of hospital stay.

[Non-invasive ventilation in acute respiratory failure of oncology-hematology patients: What are its current benefits and limitations?] / Ventilation non invasive dans l'insuffisance respiratoire aiguë des patients d'onco-hématologie : quelle place en 2023 ?

Acute respiratory failure (ARF) is a leading cause, along with sepsis, of admission to the intensive care unit (ICU) of patients with active cancer. Presenting variable clinical severity, ARF in onco-hematological patients has differing etiologies, primarily represented by possibly opportunistic acute infectious pneumonia (de novo hypoxemic ARF), and decompensation in chronic cardiac or respiratory diseases (e.g., acute pulmonary edema or exacerbated chronic obstructive pulmonary disease). In these patients, orotracheal intubation is associated with a doubled risk of in-hospital mortality. Consequently, over the last three decades, numerous researchers have attempted to demonstrate and pinpoint the precise role of non-invasive ventilation (NIV) in the specific context of ARF in onco-hematological patients. While the benefits of NIV in the management of acute pulmonary edema or alveolar hypoventilation (hypercapnic ARF) are well-demonstrated, its positioning in de novo hypoxemic ARF is debatable, and has recently been called into question. In the early 2000s, based on randomized controlled trials, NIV was recommended as first-line treatment, one reason being that it allowed significantly reduced use of orotracheal intubation. In the latest randomized studies, however, the benefits of NIV in terms of survival orotracheal intubation have not been observed; as a result, it is no longer recommended in the management of de novo hypoxemic ARF in onco-haematological patients.

The Use of Bi-Nasal Prongs for Delivery of Non-Invasive Ventilation to Foals.

Non-invasive ventilation (NIV) is a method of providing respiratory support without the need for airway intubation. The current study was undertaken to assess tolerance to bi-nasal prongs and NIV in healthy, standing, lightly sedated foals. Bi-nasal prongs were well tolerated by foals, remaining in place for the allocated five minutes in four of six unsedated foals and, subsequently, in five of six lightly sedated foals. All foals tolerated NIV through bi-nasal prongs, although increasing airway pressures were associated with increases in inspiratory volume, duration of inspiration and air leakage in most foals. These changes preceded discontinuation/intolerance of NIV on the basis of behaviour changes consistent with discomfort. Increased circuit leakage was associated with reduced return of expired air to the ventilator and increasing disparity between inspiratory and expiratory times and tidal volumes. The study results suggest that bi-nasal prongs might be suitable for NIV but that design or fitting requires further optimization and that behaviour and ventilator variables should be monitored to assess patient tolerance of the procedure.

Evaluation and Performance of a Positive Airway Pressure Device (CPAP-AirFlife™): A Randomized Crossover Non-Inferiority Clinical Study in Normal Subjects.

Background and Objectives: During the COVID-19, the demand for non-invasive ventilatory support equipment significantly increased. In response, a novel non-invasive ventilatory support model called CPAP-AirFlife™ was developed utilizing existing technologies. This model offers technological advantages, including an aerosol-controlled helmet suitable for high-risk environments such as ambulances. Additionally, it is cost-effective and does not require medical air, making it accessible for implementation in low-level hospitals, particularly in rural areas. This study aimed to assess the efficacy of CPAP-AirFlife™ by conducting a non-inferiority comparison with conventional ventilation equipment used in the Intensive Care Unit. Materials and Methods: A clinical study was conducted on normal subjects in a randomized and sequential manner. Parameters such as hemoglobin oxygen saturation by pulse oximetry, exhaled PCO2 levels, vital signs, and individual tolerance were compared between the CPAP-AirFlife™ and conventional equipment. The study population was described in terms of demographic characteristics and included in the analysis. Results: It was shown that the CPAP-AirFlife™ was not inferior to conventional equipment in terms of efficacy or tolerability. Hemoglobin oxygen saturation levels, exhaled PCO2 levels, vital signs, and individual tolerance did not significantly differ between the two models. Conclusions: The findings suggest that CPAP-AirFlife™ is a practical and cost-effective alternative for non-invasive ventilatory support. Its technological advantages, including the aerosol-controlled helmet, make it suitable for high-risk environments. The device's accessibility and affordability make it a promising solution for implementation in low-level hospitals, particularly in rural areas. This study supports using CPAP-AirFlife™ as a practical option for non-invasive ventilatory support, providing a valuable contribution to respiratory care during the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond.

The assessment and management of obstructive sleep apnoea-hypopnoea syndrome and obesity hypoventilation syndrome in obesity.

Obesity is associated with respiratory dysfunction. It is a key risk and contributory factor in the sleep related breathing disorders, obstructive sleep apnoea/hypopnoea syndrome (OSAHS) and obesity hypoventilation syndrome (OHS). Weight management is an integral part of the management of these disorders, in addition to continuous positive airways pressure (CPAP) and non-invasive ventilation (NIV). Untreated, these conditions are associated with a high disease burden and as treatment is effective, early recognition and referral is critical. Best practice in on-going care is multidisciplinary.

The Impact of High-Flow Nasal Cannula Therapy on Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Patients: A Systematic Review.

High-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) is a novel oxygenation approach in the management of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). This systematic review was focused on evaluating current evidence concerning the efficacy of HFNC in ARDS and its comparison with standard treatment approaches. For this review, a systematic search was undertaken in PubMed, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar to identify relevant studies. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were followed. All those studies that investigated the impact of HFNC on ARDS patients and were published in the English language were included. The literature search from all databases provided 6157 potentially relevant articles from PubMed (n = 1105), CINAHL (n = 808), Web of Science (n = 811), Embase (n = 2503), Cochrane database (n = 930), and Google Scholar (n = 46). After the exclusion of studies that did not fulfill the criteria, 18 studies were shortlisted for the scope of this systematic review. Among the included studies, five focused on HFNC's impact on COVID-19-related ARDS, whereas 13 studies focused on HFNC's impact on ARDS patients. Most studies demonstrated the efficacy of HFNC in managing ARDS, with some studies showing comparable efficacy and higher safety compared to noninvasive ventilation (NIV). This systematic review highlights the potential benefits of HFNC in ARDS management. The findings show that HFNC is effective in reducing the respiratory distress symptoms, the incidence of invasive ventilation, and the adverse events associated with ARDS. These findings can help clinical decision-making processes and contribute to the evidence base for optimal ARDS management strategies.

Is Intermittent Abdominal Pressure Ventilation Still Relevant? A Multicenter Retrospective Pilot Study.

Non-invasive ventilatory support (NVS) is a technique used to reduce respiratory work in neuromuscular diseases, preventing the progression of respiratory failure. NVS is usually administered via a nasal or an oronasal mask, causing discomfort, especially in patients ventilated for more than 16 h/day. Intermittent abdominal pressure ventilation (IAPV) differs completely from conventional NVS and consists of a portable ventilator and a corset with Velcro closures as the interface. In our study, the practicability and efficacy of IAPV were studied in three Italian centers monitoring 28 neuromuscular patients using IAPV who were then retrospectively analyzed. The primary outcomes were an improvement in hypoxemia and the normalization of hypercapnia, and the secondary outcome was an improvement in quality of life. Data were collected at baseline (T0) and after two hours of ventilation (T1), with follow-ups at three months (T2) and six months (T3). Statistical significance was found for PaCO2 over time (F (2.42) = 7.63, p = 0.001) and PaO2 (W = 0.539, p = 0.033). The time of NVS usage also significantly affected the quality of life (F (2.14) = 6.90, p = 0.010), as seen when comparing T0 and T3. As an alternative ventilation method, IAPV is still relevant today and could become a key part of daytime support, especially for patients who do not tolerate standard daytime NVS with an oral interface.

Corrigendum: Comfort during non-invasive ventilation.

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2022.874250.].

Cardioprotective medication in Duchenne muscular dystrophy: a single-centre cohort study.

Background: Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) is a neuromuscular disorder characterised by progressive muscle wasting impacting mobility, ventilation and cardiac function. Associated neuromuscular cardiomyopathy remains a major cause of morbidity and mortality. We investigated the effects of cardioprotective medications [angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACE-I), beta-blockers] on clinical outcomes in DMD patients. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study (reference: 2021/12469) of DMD patients at a tertiary centre between 1993-2021 screening the electronic records for demographics, comorbidities, medication, disease specific features, echocardiography, hospitalisations, and ventilator use. Results: A total of 68 patients were identified aged 27.4 (6.6) years, of which 52 were still alive. There was a difference in body mass index (BMI) between survivors and deceased patients [23.8 (5.9) vs. 19.9 (3.8) kg/m2, P=0.03]. Home mechanical ventilation (HMV) was required in 90% of patients, 85% had DMD associated cardiomyopathy. About 2/3 of all hospitalisations during the observation period were secondary to cardiopulmonary causes. The left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) at initial presentation was 44.8% (10.6%) and declined by 3.3% [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.4% to -7.0%] over the follow up period (P=0.002). A total of 61 patients were established on ACE-I for 75.9% (35.1%), and 62 were on beta-blockers for 73.6% (33.5%) of the follow up period. There was a significant LVEF decline in those taking ACE-I for limited periods compared to those permanently on ACE-I (P=0.002); a similar effect was recorded with beta-blockers (P=0.02). Conclusions: Long-term use of ACE-I and beta-blockers is associated with a reduced decline in LVEF in patients with DMD and may be protective of adverse cardiovascular ill health.

Effect of high-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy in combination with non-invasive ventilation on critically ill patients with acute respiratory failure: a retrospective study.

Background: Acute respiratory failure (ARF) is a respiratory disease in which ventilation dysfunction of the lungs occurs at rest due to various factors, resulting in oxygen deprivation and carbon dioxide (CO2) retention. In recent years, high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC), as a new type of oxygen therapy, has attracted increasing attention. Compared with traditional oxygen therapy, HFNC adopts nasal catheter to make it more in line with the physiological and respiratory characteristics of the human body, and thus can provide a higher and more constant inhalation of oxygen. This retrospective study was conducted to explore the clinical effect of HFNC combined with non-invasive ventilation (NIV) in the treatment of critically ill patients with ARF. Methods: A total of 532 critically ill patients with ARF treated in our hospital from January 2019 to December 2020 were screened for the suitability for being included in the study. Of these, 261 patients in this study received NIV. In total, 151 patients were included after applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria. NIV was generally given intermittently, and the daily duration of application was determined according to the patient's condition. The NIV-treated patients were assigned into two groups according to the oxygen inhalation mode during intermittent NIV: (I) standard group: normal oxygen inhalation was applied at the NIV interval; and (II) research group: patients treated with HFNC at the NIV interval. The respective basic data and outcome observation indices were collected. Results: In terms of the clinical outcome, the number of NIV treatment days in the research group was lower (P<0.05). At 30 min, 1 h, and 24 h after treatment, the partial pressure of arterial oxygen (PaO2), arterial oxygen saturation (SaO2), oxygenation index (P/F) indices in the research group were higher, while the CO2 partial pressure (PaCO2) was lower (P<0.05). Finally, the 28- and 90-day survival rates were compared between the groups and the results indicated no significant difference in the 28-day survival rates, but the 90-day survival rates of the research group were considerably higher (P<0.05). Conclusions: The use of HFNC combined with NIV to treat ARF in critically ill patients can effectively improve the ARF-related respiratory indicators in critically ill patients.

High flow nasal oxygen (HFNO) in the treatment of COVID-19 infection of adult patients from - An emergency perspective: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is an infectious disease caused by SARS-CoV-2, which was first discovered in Wuhan, China. The disease has grown into a global pandemic causing mild to moderate symptoms in most people. The disease can also exhibit serious illnesses, especially for patients with other chronic diseases such as cardiovascular diseases, diabetes, chronic respiratory disease, or cancer. In such cases of severe illness, high flow nasal oxygen (HFNO) has been used to provide oxygenation to COVID-19 patients. However, the efficiency of HFNO remains uncertain, prompting the conduction of this systematic review to evaluate the effectiveness of the therapy. A thorough search for relevant and original articles was carried out on five electronic databases, including ScienceDirect, PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Google Scholar. No time limitation was placed during the search as it included all the articles related to COVID-19 from 2019 to 2022. The search strategy utilized in this systematic review yielded 504 articles, of which only 10 met the eligibility criteria and were included. Our meta-analysis reveals that HFNO success rate was higher than HFNO failure rates (0.52 (95% CI; 0.47, 0.56) and 0.48 (95% CI; 0.44, 0.53), respectively), however, the difference was statistically insignificant. HFNO was associated with a significant decrease in mortality and intubation rates (0.28 (95% CI; 0.19, 0.39) and 0.28 (95% CI; 0.18, 0.41), respectively). Our statistical analysis has shown that significantly lower ROX index (5.07 ± 1.66, p = 0.028) and PaO2/FiO2 (100 ± 27.51, p = 0.031) are associated with HFNO failure, while a significantly lower respiratory rate (RR) (23.17 ± 4.167, p = 0.006) is associated with HFNO success. No statistically significant difference was observed in SpO2/FiO2 ratio between the HFNO success and failure groups (154.23 ± 42.74 vs. 124.025 ± 28.50, p = 0.62, respectively). Based on the results from our meta-analysis, the success or failure of HFNO in treating COVID-19 adult patients remains uncertain. However, HFNO has been shown to be an effective treatment in reducing mortality and intubation rates. Therefore, HFNO can be recommended for COVID-19 patients but with close monitoring and should be carried out by experienced healthcare workers.

Respiratory support strategies in the prevention of bronchopulmonary dysplasia: A single center quality improvement initiative.

Background and objectives: Bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) continues to be a significant morbidity affecting very preterm infants, despite multiple advancements in therapies to treat respiratory distress syndrome and prevent BPD. Local quality improvement (QI) efforts have shown promise in reducing unit or system-wide rates of BPD. In preterm infants born between 23- and 32-weeks' gestation, our aim was to decrease the rate of BPD at 36 weeks corrected gestational age from 43% to 28% by January 2019. Methods: Directed by a multidisciplinary respiratory QI team, we gradually implemented the following interventions to reach our aim: (1) early initiation of non-invasive ventilation in the delivery room, (2) initiation of caffeine prior to 24 h of life, (3) administration of early selective surfactant per a well-defined guideline, (4) continuation of non-invasive ventilation until 32 and 0/7 weeks corrected gestational age (CGA), and (5) a revision of the early selective surfactant guideline. Outcome measures included rates of BPD, and process measures included compliance with the above interventions. Results: A total of 509 infants with an average gestational age of 29 1/7 weeks and birth weight of 1,254 (SD±401) grams were included. The rate of BPD in our unit decreased from a baseline of 43% to 19% from the start of the project in October 2016 until the first quarter of 2022 (p < 0.00001). The greatest reductions in BPD rates were seen after the initiation of the guideline to extend non-invasive ventilation until 32 0/7 weeks CGA. The rate of severe BPD decreased from 22% to 9%. Conclusions: In preterm infants born between 23- and 32-weeks' gestation, our local QI interventions to reduce rates of BPD were associated with a reduction in rates by 56%. Increased use of antenatal steroids and higher birth weights post- vs. pre-intervention may have contributed to this successes.

Increased use of high-flow nasal cannulas after the pandemic in bronchiolitis: a more severe disease or a changed physician's attitude?

After the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, we noticed a marked increase in high-flow nasal cannula use for bronchiolitis. This study aims to report the percentage of children treated with high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) in various seasons. The secondary outcomes were admissions for bronchiolitis, virological results, hospital burden, and NICU/PICU need. We conducted a retrospective study in four Italian hospitals, examining the medical records of all infants (< 12 months) hospitalized for bronchiolitis in the last four winter seasons (1 September-31 March 2018-2022). In the 2021-2022 winter season, 66% of admitted children received HFNC versus 23%, 38%, and 35% in the previous 3 years. A total of 876 patients were hospitalized in the study periods. In 2021-2022, 300 infants were hospitalized for bronchiolitis, 22 in 2020-2021, 259 in 2019-2020, and 295 in 2018-2019. The percentage of patients needing intensive care varied from 28.7% to 18%, 22%, and 15% in each of the four considered periods (p < 0.05). Seventy-seven percent of children received oxygen in the 2021-2022 winter; vs 50%, 63%, and 55% (p < 0.01) in the previous 3 years. NIV/CPAP was used in 23%, 9%, 16%, and 12%, respectively. In 2021-2020, 2% of patients were intubated; 0 in 2020-2021, 3% in 2019-2020, and 1% in 2018-2019. CONCLUSION: This study shows a marked increase in respiratory support and intensive care admissions this last winter. While these severity indexes were all driven by medical choices, more reliable indexes such as intubation rate and length of stay did not change. Therefore, we suggest that there is a more aggressive treatment attitude rather than a more severe disease. WHAT IS KNOWN: • COVID-19 pandemic deeply impacted bronchiolitis epidemiology, reducing hospitalizations to onetenth. In the 2021-2022 winter, bronchiolitis resurged to pre-pandemic numbers in Europe. WHAT IS NEW: • Bronchiolitis hospitalization rose much faster in the 2021-2022 winter period, peaking at a higher level. Respiratory supports and high-flow nasal cannula increased significantly compared to the pre-pandemic era.

IPF Respiratory Symptoms Management - Current Evidence.

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a progressive, chronic disease of the lungs which is characterized by heavy symptom burden, especially in the last year of life. Despite recently established anti-fibrotic treatment IPF prognosis is one of the worst among interstitial lung diseases. In this review available evidence regarding pharmacological and non-pharmacological management of the main IPF symptoms, dyspnea and cough, is presented.

Clinical characteristics and determinants of mortality in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients on an intensive care unit-a retrospective explorative 1-year all-comers study.

Background: Clinical outcome in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) requiring treatment on intensive care units (ICU) remains unfavourable. The aim of this retrospective study was to exploratively identify potential predictors of unfavourable outcome in ICU patients diagnosed with COVID-19. Methods: In all patients with COVID-19 (n=50) or severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus type 2 (SARS-CoV-2) as comorbidity (n=11) at our ICU we assessed clinical, respiratory and laboratory parameters with a potential role for outcome. Main outcome variables were intubation and mortality rates. Results: Between March 2020 and March 2021, 573 patients were hospitalized with SARS-CoV-2 infection. Of these, 61 patients (10.6%, 44.3% women) aged 66.4±13.3 were admitted to ICU. A proportion of 73.8% of patients had moderate or severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). COVID-19 patients differed clinically from those with SARS-CoV-2 as comorbidity, such as severe heart or renal failure or sepsis as the leading cause of ICU admission, despite similar mortality rates (44.0% vs. 45.5%, P>0.5). Among COVID-19 patients, those who died had more often severe ARDS (91% vs. 46%, P=0.001), longer non-invasive ventilation (NIV) therapy prior to ICU (6.3±5.9 vs. 2.5±2.0 days, P=0.046), and higher interleukin-6 (IL-6) and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) values as compared to survivors. In multivariable analysis, NIV duration ≥5 days on admission [odds ratio (OR): 42.20, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.22 to >99, P=0.038] and IL-6 [OR: 4.08, 95% CI: 1.16-14.33, P=0.028] remained independently predictive of mortality. In worsening tertiles of partial pressure of oxygen (pO2)/inspiratory oxygen fraction (FiO2) on admission (≥161.5, 96.5 to <161.5, <96.5) we observed a stepwise increase in intubation rates (P=0.0034) and mortality rates (P=0.031). Conclusions: As inflammation, ARDS severity and longer NIV duration prior to ICU are associated with intubation and mortality rates, prognosis appears to be largely determined by disease severity. Whether NIV aggravates ARDS or if it indicates lack of recovery independent from type of ventilation, or both should be clarified in a prospective trial.