Efficacy of nutritional supplement (Haras) on carbon monoxide levels in smokers and non-smokers: An observational study.

Context: Carbon monoxide (CO) concentrations in exhaled air may impart a quick, non-invasive method to determine smoking status. Haras is a nutraceutical medication, which is slowly gaining recognition for its antioxidant and anti-inflammatory activities. Aims: The effectiveness of the Haras therapy in smokers and non-smokers will be assessed by evaluating breath CO levels. Methods and Materials: The study included 101 test subjects with 76 subjects of smokers and 25 subjects of non-smokers. Both the test groups were given 10 mL of Haras juice in divided doses per day for 30 days. The CO levels were evaluated using a breath analyser before drug trial and then on the 8th, 15th, 22nd and after the conclusion of the drug trial. Statistical Analysis Used: The Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to compare the CO and carboxyhemoglobin levels among smokers and non-smokers. Results: Smokers had higher mean percent carboxyhemoglobin and mean parts per million CO values than non-smokers, and the difference between the two was shown to be statistically significant (P < 0.001). It was also found to be statistically significant from the first day to the eighth day, the first day to the 15th day, the first day to the 20th second day, first day to the 30th day (P < 0.001). Conclusions: Haras can be used effectively as an alternative supportive treatment for the diminution of CO levels in smokers and non-smokers.

Evaluation of Glycosylated Hemoglobin Levels and Effect of Tobacco Smoking in Periodontally Diseased Non-Diabetic Patients.

Background and Objective: Chronic diseases have progressively increased worldwide, impacting all areas and socioeconomic groups. Periodontal disease is an increasing global concern and contains risk factors similar to other chronic illnesses. The main risk factor for periodontitis is smoking. Smoking not only hastens periodontal disease but also complicates periodontal therapy. Serum glycosylated hemoglobin levels, which are derived from the average life span of an erythrocyte, are a good indicator of glycemic management during the preceding one to three months. This study was undertaken to assess the association between tobacco smoking and periodontal disease by evaluating plaque score, gingival score, extent and severity index (ESI), and glycemic status by estimating serum HbA1c in cigarette smoker patients compared to non-smokers. Methods: The study was conducted with 40 patients in the age range of 20-40 years. Patients were divided into two groups: non-smokers (Group I) and cigarette smokers (Group II). Periodontal clinical parameters such as the plaque index (PI), gingival index (GI), and ESI were recorded during the oral cavity examination. The biochemical marker, serum glycosylated hemoglobin, was measured in both groups. All parameters were measured at baseline and three months after periodontal therapy. The statistical tests used were the paired t-test, and Chi-square test for comparison between both groups. Results: The mean difference of PI of non-smokers was 0.33 ± 0.30, and smokers were 0.52 ± 0.32, which was statistically significant. The mean difference of GI of non-smokers was 0.34 ± 0.19 and smokers 0.36 ± 0.303, which was statistically significant. The mean difference of extent in non-smokers was 5.33 ± 1.59, 5.52 ± 2.43, and smokers were 0.18 ± 0.17. The mean difference in severity in non-smokers was 0.18 ± 0.17, and smokers were 0.31 ± 0.25, which was statistically significant. The mean difference of HbA1c in non-smokers and smokers was 0.43 ± 0.277 and 0.415 ± 0.230, which shows a higher mean difference in non-smokers, which was statistically non-significant. Conclusion and Global Health Implications: This study concluded that each of Group I and Group II showed substantial improvements in all clinical periodontal variables, which include plaque index (PI), gingival index (GI), extent and severity index (ESI), and biochemical marker serum glycosylated hemoglobin. Controlling inflammation with SRP can improve insulin resistance, lower glucose levels, and prevent non-enzymatic glycation of hemoglobin.

Evaluation of Risk Factors for Lung Cancer Among Never Smokers and Their Association With Common Driver Mutations.

INTRODUCTION: The majority of lung cancers are caused by tobacco use, which is linked to lung tumors of all major histological types. A considerable fraction of lung cancer cases, the vast majority of which are adenocarcinomas, occur in "never smokers," who are characterized as having smoked fewer than 100 cigarettes in their lives. The primary objective was to assess risk factors for lung cancer in non-smokers. In contrast, secondary objectives included evaluating histological subtype, staging, and performance status and exploring associations between risk factors and common driver mutations. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study was a single-center, observational, case-control study done at All India Institute of Medical Science, Bhubaneswar, India that focused on non-smokers with lung cancer. It included 145 cases and 297 controls, with statistical analyses such as chi-square tests and logistic regression used to assess associations between risk factors and lung cancer, considering factors such as socioeconomic status, body mass index (BMI), occupation, outdoor and indoor air pollution, personal habits, and medical history. RESULTS: The study, comprising 145 lung cancer cases in non-smokers and 297 controls, found that 92.4% (134/145) of cases had adenocarcinoma, 6.9% (10/145) had squamous cell carcinoma, and 0.7% (1/145) had small cell carcinoma. Significant associations were observed for high-risk occupations, indoor biomass use without proper ventilation, low BMI, and family history of lung cancer. Specific pre-existing lung conditions like old pulmonary tuberculosis and asthma were linked to increased and decreased odds of developing lung cancer, respectively. Environmental factors, living near heavy industry, and dietary habits showed significant associations. A significant association was not found between the driver mutations and the risk factors studied. CONCLUSION: This single-center study sheds light on significant risk factors influencing lung cancer development among non-smokers. The predominant occurrence of adenocarcinoma and associations with high-risk occupations, indoor biomass exposure, low BMI, and family history emphasize the multifaceted nature of non-smoking-related lung cancer. The findings underscore the importance of comprehensive risk assessment and targeted preventive strategies in this population.

Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio and Blood Eosinophil Levels As Inflammatory Indicators in Smoker and Non-smoker Young Adult Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease at a Tertiary Care Hospital.

Background Inflammatory markers are elevated in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and can be quantified to detect severity, prognosis, mortality risk, and response to treatment. However, the estimation costs are high. The blood neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and eosinophil levels are emerging as biomarkers in COPD, yet there is a paucity of data. Aim and objectives This study was designed to elucidate the roles of the NLR and eosinophil levels in smokers and non-smokers with stable COPD male subjects, correlating them with lung functions. Materials and methods A prospective observational clinical study was conducted from January to June 2023, after receiving approval from the Institutional Ethics Committee, on 73 COPD patients aged 30-60 years who gave voluntary informed consent. Complete blood counts and spirometry were performed. Patients with a forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) % predicted <70% and an FEV1/forced vital capacity (FVC) % <70% based on the pulmonary function test (MIR Spirolab) were included. They were further divided into mild (n=10), moderate (n=27), severe (n=26), and very severe (n=10) categories as per the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) guidelines. Subjects were also categorized into smoker (n=45) and non-smoker (n=28) groups. The complete blood count was analyzed using an automated analyzer (Beckman Coulter). Analysis was also carried out with an NLR of more or less than three. A P-value of less than 0.05 was considered significant. Results Smokers constituted 61.65% (n=45) of the subjects, and non-smokers 38.35% (n=28). Among smokers, 17.78% had very severe airflow obstruction. In all COPD subjects (n=73), lymphocytes, eosinophils, and lung functions were lower in the group where the NLR was greater than three. NLR in smokers (3.52±1.43) was higher than in non-smokers (3.39±0.94). In non-smokers (n=28), blood eosinophils and lymphocytes were elevated. In smokers (n=45), blood neutrophils, monocytes, and basophils were increased. Smokers showed a non-significant increase in RBC, mean corpuscular volume (MCV), and mean corpuscular hemoglobin (MCH). Neutrophils, monocytes, eosinophils, and NLR increased with disease severity. NLR negatively correlated with FEV1 (r=-0.350, p=0.034) and positively with pack-years (r=0.546, p<0.001) in smokers. NLR negatively correlated with eosinophils, FVC, FEV1/FVC, and FEV1 % predicted. In all COPD subjects (n=73), NLR negatively correlated with blood eosinophils (r=-0.184, p=0.12), BMI, and lung functions. Conclusion NLR is elevated in COPD subjects and can serve as a marker of inflammation and a predictor of the risk and severity of airflow limitation. NLR correlates both positively and negatively with pack-years and lung functions, respectively.

COPD in Never-Smokers: BOLD Australia Study.

Purpose: Tobacco smoking is the major risk factor for COPD, and it is common for other risk factors in never-smokers to be overlooked. We examined the prevalence of COPD among never-smokers in Australia and identified associated risk factors. Methods: We used data from the Australia Burden of Obstructive Lung Disease (BOLD) study, a cross-section of people aged ≥40 years from six sites. Participants completed interviews and post-bronchodilator spirometry. COPD was primarily defined as an FEV1/FVC ratio <0.70 and secondarily as the ratio less than the lower limit of normal (LLN). Results: The prevalence of COPD in the 1656 never-smokers who completed the study was 10.5% (95% CI: 9.1-12.1%) [ratio

Association between smoking status and handgrip strength in Korean male adults: based on Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2016-2019.

Background: Smoking is a well-known risk factor of frailty. Handgrip strength (HGS) is highly representative of muscular strength and is used in the diagnosis of frailty; however, the relationship between smoking and HGS is not clear. We evaluated the relationship between smoking status and HGS. Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the association between HGS and smoking status. Methods: We enrolled adult males between the ages of 19 and 80 years who participated in the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey VII-VIII. A chi-square test and ANOVA were performed to compare the mean handgrip strength (mean HGS) between non-smokers, ex-smokers, and current smokers. Logistic regression analysis was performed to determine the association between the smoking status and mean HGS, and additional analyses were performed by dividing subgroups by age. Results: A total of 7,649 participants were analyzed. When the mean HGS and mean dominant HGS were compared according to smoking status, HGS was higher in the right hand (value of p = 0.03) and left hand (value of p < 0.001) in the order of current smokers, ex-smokers, and non-smokers. Comparing HGS of stronger hands, the mean HGS ex-smokers [aOR, (95% confidence interval): 0.61 (0.46-0.82)] and current smokers: 0.55 (0.38-0.78) was higher than that of non-smokers. When subgroup analysis was performed according to age, current smokers aged >60 years had a higher grip strength than non-smokers. Conclusion: Current smokers had a stronger mean HGS than that of ex-smokers and non-smokers. Current smokers older than 60 years appeared to have a stronger mean HGS than ex-smokers and non-smokers of the same age group.

Inflammation in smokers and non-smokers during implant surgery among Indians.

One of the main drawbacks faced by the dental implant surgeons is to assess the healing of the tissues and implant success for patients who are smokers. It is of interest to evaluate inflammatory biomarkers to understand the soft and hard tissue healing between smokers and non-smokers based on levels of IL-6 and STAT-3. This study included totally 20 patients (Group 1 : smokers (n=10) and Group 2: non-smokers (n=10)) undergoing stage-1 implant surgery and collected a tissue sample for the patients to assess the levels of IL-6 and STAT-3. The results indicated that there is a pronounced increase in the biomarkers in patients who are smokers in comparison to non-smokers.

Oral cavity cancer in young, non-smoking, and non-drinking patients: A contemporary review.

Oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) in non-smoking and non-drinking (NSND) individuals appears to be distinct from the traditional head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). The incidence of this subset is increasing, as are the number of studies examining its characteristics. NSND OSCC individuals tend to be younger (<45 years) compared to traditional HNSCC patients. The proportion of females in the NSND OSCC cohort is also higher. The tongue is the predominantly affected subsite. Studies have revealed several gene mutations and unique epigenomic profiles but no definitive genetic etiology. Transcriptomic analysis has not found any causative viral agents. Other proposed etiologies include chronic dental trauma, microbiome abnormalities, marijuana consumption, and genetic disorders. There are international efforts to determine the relative prognostic outcome of this unique cohort, but no consensus has been reached. Here, we review the incidence, demographics, subsite, possible etiologies, prognosis, and therapy implications of the NSND OSCC cohort.

Aesthetic Gingival Melanin Pigmentation Treatment in Smokers and Non-Smokers: A Comparison Study Using Nd:YAG Laser and Ceramic Bur.

Aesthetic concerns are increasing rapidly; thus, several approaches have been suggested for treating gingival melanin pigmentation. Lasers have been reported as an effective new tool, and the Nd:YAG laser beam has an affinity for melanin and haemoglobin. However, ceramic gingival bur is simple and has less bleeding effect during operation than conventional techniques. This study aimed to compare the outcomes of gingival depigmentation using the Nd:YAG laser and ceramic bur in two different groups (smokers and non-smokers). A total of 40 patients presenting with gingival melanin pigmentation were enrolled in this split-mouth study. The sample was divided into two groups: smokers and non-smokers. Treatment was performed using the Nd:YAG laser (3 W, 60 mJ/pulse, and 50 Hz) and ceramic bur with a one-week interval between the two methods. Clinical indices were recorded, including intraoperative bleeding, wound healing, post-operative pain, and the recurrence of pigmentation, and follow-up periods were determined in the 3rd, 6th, and 9th months postoperatively. Both treatments promoted a similar pain experience and recurrence rate of pigmentation (p > 0.489, p = 1.000, respectively). Bleeding during surgery and complete healing recovery after one week were statistically significantly higher when using ceramic bur (p = 0.00, p = 0.041, respectively). Concerning the effect of smoking on the treatment, a higher recurrence rate was observed in SG than N-SG in laser sites (50%, and 95%, respectively) and bur sites (60%, and 85%, respectively), but statistically no significant difference was observed (p > 0.080). In conclusion, both procedures are adequate for aesthetic gingival depigmentation treatment. The Nd:YAG laser showed greater effectiveness in controlling bleeding, while ceramic bur showed a faster clinical recovery. Furthermore, smokers were more likely to have low depigmentation treatment stability.

Initial low-dose computed tomography screening results and summary of participant characteristics: based on the latest Chinese guideline.

Background: Low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) has been promoted as a promising screening strategy for early detection of lung cancer. China released the latest lung cancer screening guideline in 2021. The compliance of the individuals who received LDCT for lung cancer screening with the guideline is unknown yet. It is necessary to summarize the distribution of guideline-defined lung cancer-related risk factors in the Chinese population so as to inform the selection of target population for the future lung cancer screening. Methods: A single-center, cross-sectional study design was adopted. All participants were individuals who underwent LDCT at a tertiary teaching hospital in Hunan, China, between 1 January and 31 December 2021. LDCT results were derived along with guideline-based characteristics for descriptive analysis. Results: A total of 5,486 participants were included. Over one-quarter (1,426, 26.0%) of the participants who received screening did not meet the guideline-defined high-risk population, even among non-smokers (36.4%). Most of the participants (4,622, 84.3%) were found to have lung nodules, while no clinical intervention was required basically. The detection rate of positive nodules varied from 46.8% to 71.2% when using different cut-off values for positive nodules. Among non-smoking women, ground glass opacity appeared to be more significantly common compared with non-smoking men (26.7% vs. 21.8%). Conclusion: Over one-quarter of individuals who received LDCT screening did not meet the guideline-defined high-risk populations. Appropriate cut-off values for positive nodules need to be continuously explored. More precise and localized criteria for high-risk individuals are needed, especially for non-smoking women.

Bone Grafting Outcomes in Smokers Undergoing High Tibial Osteotomy: A Systematic Review.

This systematic review summarises the findings in the literature available to show outcomes of high tibial osteotomy (HTO) with bone grafting in smokers. It also studies the trend of complications, outcome measures used and overall outcomes like union, non-union or the need to perform revision surgeries. The aim is to find out if HTO done with bone grafting improves outcomes in smokers. Articles were shortlisted using Population, Intervention, Control, and Outcomes (PICO) search design and quality assessment was completed using Jadad, STROBE (Strengthening the Reporting of Observational studies in Epidemiology), Delphi, and Critical Appraisal Skills Program (CASP) followed by data extraction by two independent authors. There was union in 97.6% of smokers who received HTO with bone grafting. A case of non-union was treated with removal of metalwork and distraction osteogenesis. Three cases of unknown demographics had arthroplasty in the time frame from HTO with bone grafting to follow up. The commonest complication post surgery was metalwork causing soft tissue irritation and lateral proximal tibial cortex fracture. Following this review we can conclude that HTO with bone grafting could be considered as an option to achieve better outcomes in smokers. Bone grafting helps healing across osteotomy sites in smokers whose healing potential is poor. Autogenous Iliac crest bone grafting is ideal due to its osteoinductive and osteoconductive properties, but has the disadvantage of donor site morbidity.

Clinical characteristics of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in never-smokers: A systematic review.

INTRODUCTION: Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) is the third cause of death worldwide. While tobacco smoking is a key risk factor, COPD also occurs in never-smokers (NS). However, available evidence on risk factors, clinical characteristics, and natural history of the disease in NS is scarce. Here, we perform a systematic review of the literature to better describe the characteristics of COPD in NS. METHODS: We searched different databases following the PRISMA guidelines with explicit inclusion and exclusion criteria. A purpose-designed quality scale was applied to the studies included in the analysis. It was not possible to pool the results due to the high heterogeneity of the studies included. RESULTS: A total of 17 studies that met the selection criteria were included, albeit only 2 of them studied NS exclusively. The total number of participants in these studies were 57,146 subjects, 25,047 of whom were NS and 2,655 of the latter had NS-COPD. Compared to COPD in smokers, COPD in NS is more frequent in women and older ages, and is associated with a slightly higher prevalence of comorbidities. There are not enough studies to understand if COPD progression and clinical symptoms in NS are different to that of ever-smokers. CONCLUSIONS: There is a significant knowledge gap on COPD in NS. Given that COPD in NS account for about a third of all COPD patients in the world, particularly in low-middle income countries, and the decrease in tobacco consumption in high income countries, understanding COPD in NS constitutes a public-health priority.

Differential characteristics of patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck with no history of tobacco or alcohol use.

OBJECTIVE: The present study aims to analyse the differential characteristics of patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) without a history of consumption of toxic substances such as tobacco and alcohol. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We carried out a retrospective study of 4694 patients with HNSCC located in the oral cavity, oropharynx, hypopharynx or larynx treated in our centre during the period 1985-2019. RESULT: 7.7% of the patients (n = 363) did not report a history of consumption of toxic substances. The group of patients with no toxic history was older, had a higher proportion of women, a higher frequency of cases located in the oral cavity, a higher proportion of cases diagnosed in early stages, and a lower incidence of second neoplasms. The percentage of patients with no history of consumption of toxic substances increased significantly over the study period. The overall survival of patients with no history of consumption of toxic substances was significantly higher than that of patients with toxic substances use. Specific survival for patients with tumours located in the oral cavity without a history of consumption of toxic substances was significantly lower than that of patients with toxic substances use, whereas for patients with oropharyngeal carcinomas the absence of a history of consumption of toxic substances was associated with a better prognosis. CONCLUSIONS: There were differences in the epidemiological and prognostic characteristics of patients with HNSCC according to the history of consumption of toxic substances such as tobacco and alcohol.

Modifiable risk factors for oral cavity cancer in non-smokers: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Oral cavity cancer (OCC) is traditionally associated with smoking, but there is an increasing prevalence of the disease among non-smokers. This review investigates possible modifiable risk factors in the development of OCC in non-smokers (OCCNS). METHODS: PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Scopus were searched for publications prior to June 2021. Comparative studies investigating modifiable OCCNS risk factors were identified following PRISMA guidelines. Publication date, population size, and results were indexed. Study quality was assessed using MINORS (Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies). Factors examined by multiple studies were analyzed using random-effect meta-analysis framework. RESULTS: Literature search resulted in 1,625 unique publications. 52 records met inclusion criterion, investigating alcohol (n = 22), chewing products (n = 18), diet (n = 7), dental health (n = 11), and medical comorbidities (n = 6). CONCLUSION: This review demonstrates the paucity of large studies investigating OCCNS risk factors. Further investigation is warranted to help clinicians risk-stratify patients without traditional risk factors.

Características diferenciales de los pacientes con carcinoma escamoso de cabeza y cuello sin antecedentes de consumo de tabaco ni alcohol / Differential characteristics of patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck with no history of tobacco or alcohol use

Objetivo: El objetivo del presente estudio es analizar las características diferenciales de los pacientes con un carcinoma escamoso de cabeza y cuello (CECC) sin antecedentes de consumo de tóxicos, como el tabaco y el alcohol.Material y métodosSe llevó a cabo un estudio retrospectivo de 4.694 pacientes con un CECC localizado en la cavidad oral, orofaringe, hipofaringe o laringe tratados en nuestro centro durante el periodo 1985-2019.ResultadoUn 7,7% de los pacientes (n=363) no refirieron el antecedente de consumo de tóxicos. El grupo de pacientes sin antecedentes tóxicos tenía mayor edad, una mayor proporción de mujeres, una mayor frecuencia de casos localizados en la cavidad oral, una mayor proporción de casos diagnosticados en estadios iniciales y una menor incidencia de segundas neoplasias. El porcentaje de pacientes sin antecedentes de consumo de tóxicos aumentó de forma significativa a lo largo del periodo de estudio. La supervivencia global de los pacientes sin antecedentes de consumo de tóxicos fue significativamente más elevada que la de los pacientes con antecedentes tóxicos. La supervivencia específica para los pacientes con tumores localizados en la cavidad oral sin antecedentes tóxicos fue significativamente inferior, en tanto que para los pacientes con carcinomas de orofaringe la ausencia de antecedentes de consumo de tóxicos se asoció a un mejor pronóstico.ConclusionesExistieron diferencias en las características epidemiológicas y pronósticas de los pacientes con CECC en función del antecedente de consumo de tóxicos como el tabaco o el alcohol. (AU)

Objective: The present study aims to analyze the differential characteristics of patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) without a history of consumption of toxic substances such as tobacco and alcohol.Material and methodsWe carried out a retrospective study of 4,694 patients with HNSCC located in the oral cavity, oropharynx, hypopharynx or larynx treated in our center during the period 1985-2019.ResultThe 7.7% of the patients (n=363) did not report a history of consumption of toxic substances. The group of patients with no toxic history was older, had a higher proportion of women, a higher frequency of cases located in the oral cavity, a higher proportion of cases diagnosed in early stages, and a lower incidence of second neoplasms. The percentage of patients with no history of consumption of toxic substances increased significantly over the study period. The overall survival of patients with no history of consumption of toxic substances was significantly higher than that of patients with toxic substances use. Specific survival for patients with tumors located in the oral cavity without a history of consumption of toxic substances was significantly lower than that of patients with toxic substances use, whereas for patients with oropharyngeal carcinomas the absence of a history of consumption of toxic substances was associated with a better prognosis.ConclusionsThere were differences in the epidemiological and prognostic characteristics of patients with HNSCC according to the history of consumption of toxic substances such as tobacco and alcohol. (AU)

Influence of smoking on the effectiveness of tooth whitening: a systematic review.

OBJECTIVES: Perform a systematic review to evaluate the influence of smoking on the effectiveness of tooth whitening (TW) and to analyze whether tooth sensitivity is different between smokers and non-smokers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic review modeled according to the PRISMA guidelines was conducted. PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane, Scopus, and OpenGrey databases were searched for related clinical trials. The population, exposure, comparison, outcomes (PECO) was individuals who had TW performed, smoking individuals, non-smoking individuals, and effectiveness of TW, respectively. Risk of bias was assessed with the ROBINS-I tool, and data from included studies were extracted by two researchers independently. The certainty of the evidence was evaluated using the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations) approach. RESULTS: Five studies were selected for qualitative analysis. The ROBINS-I tool classified 3 studies as having a moderate risk of bias, one study as having a serious risk of bias, and one with a critical risk. GRADE performed only for color change results and showed a low certainty of evidence. Limited evidence suggests that effectiveness of TW between smokers and non-smokers is similar. The tooth sensitivity also does not seem to be influenced by smoking. Due to the heterogeneity of the data, a meta-analysis could not be performed. CONCLUSIONS: Effectiveness of TW between smokers and non-smokers is comparable. The tooth sensitivity also does not seem to be influenced by smoking. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The effectiveness of bleaching among smokers and non-smokers appears to be similar. Tooth sensitivity during TW also appears not to be influenced by smoking.

Screening Criteria Evaluation for Expansion in Pulmonary Neoplasias (SCREEN).

The SCREEN study investigated screening eligibility and survival outcomes between heavy smokers and light-or-never-smokers with lung cancer to determine whether expanded risk factor analysis is needed to refine screening criteria. SCREEN is a retrospective study of 917 lung cancer patients diagnosed between 2005 and 2018 in Nova Scotia, Canada. Screening eligibility was determined using the National Lung Screening Trial (NSLT) criteria. Mortality risk between heavy smokers and light-or-never-smokers was compared using proportional-hazards models. The median follow-up was 2.9 years. The cohort was comprised of 179 (46.1%) female heavy smokers and 306 (57.8%) female light-or-never-smokers. Light-or-never-smokers were more likely to have a diagnosis of adenocarcinoma [n=378 (71.6%)] compared to heavy smokers [n=234 (60.5%); P< 0.001]. Heavy smokers were more frequently diagnosed with squamous cell carcinoma [n=111 (28.7%)] compared to light-or-never-smokers, [n=100 (18.9%); P< 0.001]. Overall, 36.9% (338) of patients met NLST screening criteria. There was no difference in 5-year survival between light-or-never-smokers and heavy smokers [55.2% (338) vs 58.5% (529); P = 0.408; HR 1.06, 95% CI 0.80-1.40; P = 0.704]. Multivariate analysis showed that males had an increased mortality risk [HR 2.00 (95% CI 1.57-2.54); P< 0.001]. Half of lung cancer patients were missed with the conventional screening criteria. There were more curable, stage 1 tumors among light-or-never-smokers. Smoking status and age alone may be insufficient predictors of lung cancer risk and prognosis. Expanded risk factor analysis is needed to refine lung cancer screening criteria.

Effect of Smoking on Nasal Mucociliary Clearance.

Nasal mucociliary clearance (NMC) system is an important defence mechanism in respiratory tract. The contents present in the smoke are found to be toxic to cilia in vitro. Our study aims at evaluating the NMC in smokers so as to know effect of tobacco smoke on ciliary function and also comparing it with non smokers. We also studied effect of duration, intensity and pattern of smoking on the NMC. A total of 60 participants in the age group 21-40 years (30 smokers and 30 non smokers) were included in the study. Saccharin test was performed in all participants. A 0.5 mm diameter particle of saccharin was placed 1 cm from the anterior end of the inferior nasal turbinate. The time duration was noted for the first appearance of sweet taste. The mean NMC in smoker group was 16.53 min and in nonsmoker group was 9.28 min On comparison it was found that NMC time in smoker group was significantly higher than nonsmoker group p < 0.001 also a positive correlation noted between pack years of smoking and NMC. Saccharin test is a simple test to assess NMC. The prolonged NMC in smokers may be due to reduced ciliary activity or due to changes in viscoelastic properties.

Dietary Antioxidants and Lung Cancer Risk in Smokers and Non-Smokers.

Smoking is considered a major risk factor in the development of lung diseases worldwide. Active smoking and secondhand (passive) smoke (SHS) are related to lung cancer (LC) risk. Oxidative stress (OS) and/or lipid peroxidation (LP) induced by cigarette smoke (CS) are found to be involved in the pathogenesis of LC. Meta-analyses and other case-control/prospective cohort studies are inconclusive and have yielded inconsistent results concerning the protective role of dietary vitamins C and E, retinol, and iron intake against LC risk in smokers and/or non-smokers. Furthermore, the role of vitamins and minerals as antioxidants with the potential in protecting LC cells against CS-induced OS in smokers and non-smokers has not been fully elucidated. Thus, this review aims to summarize the available evidence reporting the relationships between dietary antioxidant intake and LC risk in smokers and non-smokers that may be used to provide suggestions for future research.