Behind the pattern: General surgery residsent autonomy in robotic surgery.

Objective: Robotic surgery is increasingly utilized and common in general surgery training programs. This study sought to better understand the factors that influence resident operative autonomy in robotic surgery. We hypothesized that resident seniority, surgeon work experience, surgeon robotic-assisted surgery (RAS) case volume, and procedure type influence general surgery residents' opportunities for autonomy in RAS as measured by percentage of resident individual console time (ICT). Methods: General surgery resident ICT data for robotic cholecystectomy (RC), inguinal hernia (RIH), and ventral hernia (RVH) operations performed on the dual-console Da Vinci surgical robotic system between July 2019 and June 2021 were extracted. Cases with postgraduate year (PGY) 2-5 residents participating as a console surgeon were included. A sequential explanatory mixed-methods approach was undertaken to explore the ICT results and we conducted secondary qualitative interviews with surgeons. Descriptive statistics and thematic analysis were applied. Results: Resident ICT data from 420 robotic cases (IH 200, RC 121, and VH 99) performed by 20 junior residents (PGY2-3), 18 senior residents (PGY4-5), and 9 attending surgeons were extracted. The average ICT per case was 26.8 % for junior residents and 42.4 % for senior residents. Compared to early-career surgeons, surgeons with over 10 years' work experience gave less ICT to junior (18.2 % vs. 32.0 %) and senior residents (33.9 % vs. 56.6 %) respectively. Surgeons' RAS case volume had no correlation with resident ICT (r = 0.003, p = 0.0003). On average, residents had the most ICT in RC (45.8 %), followed by RIH (36.7 %) and RVH (28.6 %). Interviews with surgeons revealed two potential reasons for these resident ICT patterns: 1) Surgeon assessment of resident training year/experience influenced decisions to grant ICT; 2) Surgeons' perceived operative time pressure inversely affected resident ICT. Conclusions: This study suggests resident ICT/autonomy in RC, RIH, and RVH are influenced by resident seniority level, surgeon work experience, and procedure type, but not related to surgeon RAS case volume. Design and implementation of an effective robotic training program must consider the external pressures at conflict with increased resident operative autonomy and seek to mitigate them.

Laparoscopic vs robotic inguinal hernia repair: a comparison of learning curves and skill transference in general surgery residents.

BACKGROUND: There is no consensus on whether laparoscopic experience should be a prerequisite for robotic training. Further, there is limited information on skill transference between laparoscopic and robotic techniques. This study focused on the general surgery residents' learning curve and skill transference within the two minimally invasive platforms. METHODS: General surgery residents were observed during the performance of laparoscopic and robotic inguinal hernia repairs. The recorded data included objective measures (operative time, resident participation indicated by percent active time on console or laparoscopy relative to total case time, number of handoffs between the resident and attending), and subjective evaluations (preceptor and trainee assessments of operative performance) while controlling for case complexity, patient comorbidities, and residents' prior operative experience. Wilcoxon two-sample tests and Pearson Correlation coefficients were used for analysis. RESULTS: Twenty laparoscopic and forty-four robotic cases were observed. Mean operative times were 90 min for robotic and 95 min for laparoscopic cases (P = 0.4590). Residents' active participation time was 66% on the robotic platform and 37% for laparoscopic (P = < 0.0001). On average, hand-offs occurred 9.7 times during robotic cases and 6.3 times during laparoscopic cases (P = 0.0131). The mean number of cases per resident was 5.86 robotic and 1.67 laparoscopic (P = 0.0312). For robotic cases, there was a strong correlation between percent active resident participation and their prior robotic experience (r = 0.78) while there was a weaker correlation with prior laparoscopic experience (r = 0.47). On the other hand, prior robotic experience had minimal correlation with the percent active resident participation in laparoscopic cases (r = 0.12) and a weak correlation with prior laparoscopic experience (r = 0.37). CONCLUSION: The robotic platform may be a more effective teaching tool with a higher degree of entrustability indicated by the higher mean resident participation. We observed a greater degree of skill transference from laparoscopy to the robot, indicated by a higher degree of correlation between the resident's prior laparoscopic experience and the percent console time in robotic cases. There was minimal correlation between residents' prior robotic experience and their participation in laparoscopic cases. Our findings suggest that the learning curve for the robot may be shorter as prior robotic experience had a much stronger association with future robotic performance compared to the association observed in laparoscopy.

Gender differences in autonomy and performance assessments in a national cohort of vascular surgery trainees.

OBJECTIVE: Gender disparities in surgical training and assessment are described in the general surgery literature. Assessment disparities have not been explored in vascular surgery. We sought to investigate gender disparities in operative assessment in a national cohort of vascular surgery integrated residents (VIRs) and fellows (VSFs). METHODS: Operative performance and autonomy ratings from the Society for Improving Medical Professional Learning (SIMPL) application database were collected for all vascular surgery participating institutions from 2018 to 2023. Logistic generalized linear mixed models were conducted to examine the association of faculty and trainee gender on faculty and self-assessment of autonomy and performance. Data were adjusted for post-graduate year and case complexity. Random effects were included to account for clustering effects due to participant, program, and procedure. RESULTS: One hundred three trainees (n = 63 VIRs; n = 40 VSFs; 63.1% men) and 99 faculty (73.7% men) from 17 institutions (n = 12 VIR and n = 13 VSF programs) contributed 4951 total assessments (44.4% by faculty, 55.6% by trainees) across 235 unique procedures. Faculty and trainee gender were not associated with faculty ratings of performance (faculty gender: odds ratio [OR], 0.78; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.27-2.29; trainee gender: OR, 1.80; 95% CI, 0.76-0.43) or autonomy (faculty gender: OR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.41-2.39; trainee gender: OR, 1.23; 95% CI, 0.62-2.45) of trainees. All trainees self-assessed at lower performance and autonomy ratings as compared with faculty assessments. However, women trainees rated themselves significantly lower than men for both autonomy (OR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.43-0.74) and performance (OR, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.30-0.54). CONCLUSIONS: Although gender was not associated with differences in faculty assessment of performance or autonomy among vascular surgery trainees, women trainees perceive themselves as performing with lower competency and less autonomy than their male colleagues. These findings suggest utility for exploring gender differences in real-time feedback delivered to and received by trainees and targeted interventions to align trainee self-perception with actual operative performance and autonomy to optimize surgical skill acquisition.

Why Not This Case? Differences Between Resident and Attending Operative Cases at Teaching Hospitals.

INTRODUCTION: Previous studies have focused on outcomes pertaining to resident operative autonomy, but there has been little academic work examining the types of patients and cases where autonomy is afforded. We sought to describe the differences between surgical patient populations in teaching cases where residents are and are not afforded autonomy. METHODS: We examined all general and vascular operations at Veterans Affairs teaching hospitals from 2004 to 2019 using Veterans Affairs Surgical Quality Improvement Program. Level of resident supervision is prospectively recorded by the operating room nurse at the time of surgery: attending primary (AP): the attending performs the case with or without a resident; attending resident (AR): the resident performs the case with the attending scrubbed; resident primary (RP): resident operating with supervising attending not scrubbed. Resident (R) cases refer to AR + RP. Patient demographics, comorbidities, level of supervision, and top cases within each group were evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 618,578 cases were analyzed; 154,217 (24.9%) were AP, 425,933 (68.9%) AR, and 38,428 (6.2%) RP. Using work relative value unit as a surrogate for complexity, RP was the least complex compared to AP and AR (10.4/14.4/14.8, P < 0.001). RP also had a lower proportion of American Society of Anesthesiologists 3 and 4 + 5 patients (P < 0.001), were younger (P < 0.001), and generally had lower comorbidities. The most common RP cases made up a higher proportion of all RP cases than they did for AP/AR and demonstrated several core competencies (hernia, cholecystectomy, appendectomy, amputation). R cases, however, were generally sicker than AP cases. CONCLUSIONS: In the small proportion of cases where residents were afforded autonomy, we found they were more focused on the core general surgery cases on lower risk patients. This selection bias likely demonstrates appropriate attending judgment in affording autonomy. However, this cohort consisted of many "sicker" patients and those factors alone should not disqualify resident involvement.

Did Residents Stop Operating During COVID? Impact of COVID-19 Across VA Teaching Hospitals on Surgical Resident Education.

BACKGROUND: During the COVID-19 pandemic, elective cases across the nation were suspended, leading to major decreases in operative volume for surgical trainees. Surgical resident operative autonomy has been declining over time, so we sought to explore the effect COVID-19 had on resident autonomy within VA teaching hospitals. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of surgical cases across specialties was performed using the VA Surgical Quality Improvement Program database from September 2019 to September 2021 at VA teaching hospitals. Supervision codes are recorded prospectively: attending surgeon performs the operation (AP), resident completes majority of the case with the attending scrubbed (AR), and resident is primary surgeon without attending scrubbed (RP). RESULTS: 20,457 cases pre-COVID decreased to 11,035 during peak-COVID (P < .001). Overall, RP cases increased from 6.5% to 7.6% during the peak (P < .001) and trended back downwards during the recovery periods. AP decreased initially (29.9%-27.7%, P < .001), but regressed back to pre-pandemic numbers. In general surgery RP cases, urgent cases such as laparoscopic cholecystectomies increased from 18.8% to 27.5%, while elective repairs decreased during the peak. Similar changes were noted across specialties. DISCUSSION: Operative cases dropped by half from pre- to peak- COVID and remained 20% below pre-pandemic volume the following year. Interestingly, RP rates increased for several specialties during the peak of the pandemic, which may have resulted from a relative higher ratio of resident personnel:case volume and shift in case distribution from elective to urgent. The increase in RP rate has begun to regress to pre-COVID levels which need to be readdressed.

Evaluation Tools for Assessing Autonomy of Surgical Residents in the Operating Room and Factors Influencing Access to Autonomy: A Systematic Literature Review.

BACKGROUND: Surgical residents in France lack a clear pedagogical framework for achieving autonomy in the operating room. The progressive acquisition of surgical autonomy is a determining factor in the confidence of operators for their future independent practice. Currently, there is no autonomy scale commonly used in Europe. The objective of this study is to identify existing tools for quantifying the autonomy of residents and the factors that influence it. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a qualitative systematic review following the recommendations of the Systematic Review Without Meta-Analysis (SWiM) guidelines. Publications were extracted from the MEDLINE (PubMed), EMBASE, and PSYCINFO databases. All publications without date restrictions up to July 2022 were identified. RESULTS: Among the 231 identified publications, 21 met the inclusion criteria. Seventeen publications used a graded autonomy assessment tool by the student and/or the teacher, while 4 used evaluations by an observing third party. We found 8 different autonomy scales, with the Zwisch Scale representing 57.1% of the cases. Factors influencing autonomy were diverse, including the work context, experience, and gender of the resident and their teacher. DISCUSSION: We found heterogeneity in the tools used to "measure" the autonomy of a resident in the operating room. The SIMPL tool or the Zwisch Scale appear to be the most frequently used tools. The relationship between autonomy, performance, confidence, and knowledge may require multidimensional tools that encompass various areas of competence, but this could make their daily application more challenging. The factors influencing autonomy are numerous; and understanding them would improve teaching in the operating room. There is a significant lack of data on surgical autonomy in France, as well as a lack of evaluation in the field of gynecology-obstetrics worldwide.

Autonomy Maps: Building a Shared Mental Model for Progressive Resident Operative Autonomy on the Road to Entrustable Professional Activities (EPAs).

Our residents expressed dissatisfaction with operative autonomy and faculty feedback regarding technical skills. They reported variability among faculty regarding allowed operative autonomy. Our goals were to establish a shared mental model among residents and faculty regarding intraoperative performance expectations. We asked faculty to assign a level of expected autonomy (Zwisch scale) for various steps of common procedures according to the resident post-graduate year. Through an iterative process, the maps were standardized across service lines. The resulting "Autonomy Maps" were distributed to the faculty and residents. We held educational sessions and set expectations for use. Selected benchmarks were incorporated into resident end-of-rotation assessment forms. Initial operative case mapping identified variability in faculty expectations for a given post-graduate year and procedure. Residents reported improved satisfaction with understanding expectations regarding operative performance. Establishing autonomy benchmarks facilitated more specific feedback regarding residents' technical skills. Faculty expectations for resident operative autonomy are variable. Autonomy Maps provide structure for a shared mental model between faculty and residents for progressive operative autonomy and serve as a framework for expectations that improve resident satisfaction. Case-specific technical benchmarks are useful tools for assessing residents' technical milestones.

Is Robotic Console Time a Surrogate for Resident Operative Autonomy?

OBJECTIVE: Robotic-assisted surgery is an increasing part of general surgery training, but resident autonomy on the robotic platform can be hard to quantify. Robotic console time (RCT), the percentage of time the resident controls the console, may be an appropriate measure of resident operative autonomy. This study aims to characterize the correlation between objective resident RCT and subjectively scored operative autonomy. METHODS: Using a validated resident performance evaluation instrument, we collected resident operative autonomy ratings from residents and attendings performing robotic cholecystectomy (RC) and robotic inguinal hernia repair (IH) at a university-based general surgery program between 9/2020-6/2021. We then extracted RCT data from the Intuitive surgical system. Descriptive statistics, t-tests and ANOVA were performed. RESULTS: A total of 31 robotic operations (13 RC, 18 IH) performed by 4 attending surgeons and 8 residents (4 junior, 4 senior) were matched and included. 83.9% of cases were scored by both attending and resident. The average RCT per case was 35.6%(95% CI 13.0%,58.3%) for junior residents (PGY 2-3) and 59.7%(CI 51.1%,68.3%) for senior residents (PGY 4-5). The mean autonomy evaluated by residents was 3.29(CI 2.85,3.73) out of a maximum score of 5, while the mean autonomy evaluated by attendings was 4.12(CI 3.68,4.55). RCT significantly correlated with subjective evaluations of resident autonomy (r=0.61, p=0.0003). RCT also moderately correlated with resident training level (r=0.5306, p<0.0001). Neither attending robotic experience nor operation type significantly correlated with RCT or autonomy evaluation scores. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that resident console time is a valid surrogate for resident operative autonomy in robotic cholecystectomy and inguinal hernia repair. RCT may be a valuable measure in objective assessment of residents' operative autonomy and training efficiency. Future investigation into how RCT correlates with subjective and objective autonomy metrics such as verbal guidance or distinguishing critical operative steps is needed to validate the study findings further.

Declining Surgical Resident Operative Autonomy-All Trainees Are Not Created Equal.

INTRODUCTION: We have previously shown that resident autonomy has decreased over time overall for all surgery residents. The purpose of this study is to examine changes in operative autonomy in general surgery residency within each postgraduate year (PGY) level. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective analysis of the Veterans Association Surgical Quality Improvement Program database from July 1, 2004 to September 30, 2019. All general surgery, vascular surgery, and thoracic surgery procedures were analyzed and categorized by level of resident supervision as attending primary, attending operating with resident, or resident primary without attending scrubbed. Procedure work portion of relative value unit was used to capture procedure complexity. Changes in resident autonomy over time, procedure complexity, and outcomes were compared among PGY levels 1 to 5. RESULTS: A total of 385,482 cases were analyzed. At each PGY level from 2014 to 2018, the relative decrease in resident primary cases ranged from -37.3% (PGY 4) to -75.5% (PGY 3). Mean work portion of relative value unit saw steady increase with PGY level (8.4 ± 3.5 in PGY 1 to 10.8 ± 5.7 in PGY 5, P < 0.001) and did not show a trend over time. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical resident operative autonomy has markedly decreased over time across all PGY levels. This effect is most profound at the PGY 3 level, while more senior residents are affected to a lesser degree. Case complexity show PGY level-appropriate increase in resident autonomous cases. Decrease in resident autonomy over time is not associated with changes in case complexity.

The robot doesn't lie: real-life validation of robotic performance metrics.

BACKGROUND: Degree of resident participation in a case is often used as a surrogate marker for operative autonomy, an essential element of surgical resident training. Previous studies have demonstrated a considerable disagreement between the perceptions of attending surgeons and trainees when it comes to estimating operative participation. The Da Vinci Surgical System dual console interface allows machine generated measurements of trainee's active participation, which has the potential to obviate the need for labor intensive direct observation of surgical procedures. However, the robotic metrics require validation. We present a comparison of operative participation as perceived by the resident, faculty, trained research staff observer (gold standard), and robotic machine generated data. METHODS: A total of 28 consecutive robotic inguinal hernia repair procedures were observed by research staff. Operative time, percent active time for the resident, and number of handoffs between the resident and attending were recorded by trained research staff in the operating room and the Da Vinci Surgical System. Attending and resident evaluations of operative performance and perceptions of percent active time for the resident were collected using standardized forms and compared with the research staff observed values and the robot-generated console data. Wilcoxon two-sample tests and Pearson Correlation coefficients statistical analysis were performed. RESULTS: Robotic inguinal hernia repair cases had a mean operative time of 91.3 (30) minutes and an attending-rated mean difficulty of 3.1 (1.26) out of 5. Residents were recorded to be the active surgeon 71.8% (17.7) of the total case time by research staff. There was a strong correlation (r = 0.77) in number of handoffs between faculty and trainee as recorded by the research staff and robot (4.28 (2.01) vs. 5.8 (3.04) respectively). The robotic machine generated data demonstrated the highest degree of association when compared to the gold standard (research staff observed data), with r = 0.98, p < 0.0001. Lower levels of association were seen with resident reported (r = 0.66) perceptions and faculty-reported (r = 0.55) perceptions of resident active operative time. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that robot-generated performance metrics are an extremely accurate and reliable measure of intraoperative resident participation indicated by a very strong correlation with the data recorded by research staff's direct observation of the case. Residents demonstrated a more accurate awareness of their degree of participation compared with faculty surgeons. With high accuracy and ease of use, robotic surgical system performance metrics have the potential to be a valuable tool in surgical training and skill assessment.

Operative Confidence Among U.S General Surgery Residents.

BACKGROUND: General surgery residents (GSRs) must develop operative autonomy skills to practice independently after graduation. We aim to investigate perceived confidence and operative autonomy of GSR physicians in order to identify and address influential factors. METHODS: A 28-question anonymous online survey was distributed to 23 United States general surgery residency programs. Multivariable logistic regression was used for calculating the adjusted odds ratio (aOR) for binary outcomes. Significance was defined as P-values ≤ .05 or 95% confidence intervals (CIs) >1 or <1. RESULTS: There were 120/558 (21.5%) GSR respondents. General surgery residents with >200 overall operative case volume reported significantly higher confidence with minor cases (P = .05) and major cases (P = .02). General surgery residents that performed both minor and major surgeries reported higher confidence with minor cases at 85.7% compared to GSRs that performed mostly minor surgeries (64.7%) and mostly major surgeries (62.5%). General surgery residents who performed >50 minor surgeries during their PGY 1 and 2 were less confident with major cases than GSRs who performed <50 minor surgeries (aOR: 19.98, 95% CI: 1.26, 318). General surgery residents from community teaching hospitals reported higher confidence with major and minor cases than GSRs from university teaching hospitals and combined programs. CONCLUSION: Increased case volume, predominant case type, early surgical experience during PGY 1 and 2 years, and training at community teaching hospitals were identified as the most important factors that positively influence perception of operative confidence and autonomy among GSRs. These may have important implications in the development of future surgeons.

General Surgery Resident Complement and Operative Autonomy - Size Matters.

OBJECTIVE: Operative autonomy has progressively decreased for surgery residents. This study investigates the effect of general surgery resident complement size at Veterans Affairs (VA) hospitals on operative autonomy for the residents. We hypothesize that smaller complements of residents would result in fewer opportunities for operative autonomy. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of the Veterans Affairs Surgical Quality Improvement Program (VASQIP) database. SETTING: Operative cases within the VASQIP database from July 1, 2004 to September 30, 2019 were analyzed. PARTICIPANTS: All general surgery procedures performed at teaching VA hospitals from January 2004 to September 2019 were included. The level of resident operative autonomy is defined as follows: attending primary surgeon with or without a resident (AP), resident primary surgeon with attending scrubbed (AR), and resident primary without attending scrubbed (RP). Resident complement is based on funded resident positions at each VA hospital during the academic year 2017-2018 and stratified into 3 groups: small (≤4), medium (>4-<7), and large (≥7). The primary outcome was the proportion of operative autonomy for each resident complement group. Secondary outcomes were level of autonomy over time, and mortality and morbidity for RP procedures. Categorical data were compared with Chi-squared test. RESULTS: Four hundred sixty-one thousand seven hundred thirty-four procedures across 92 VA hospitals with general surgery residents were included in the analysis. There were 126,062 cases performed at 29 small resident complement hospitals, 135,539 at 28 medium resident complement hospitals, and 200,133 at 35 large resident complement hospitals. The percentage of RP procedures was higher with increasing resident complement (2.1% vs 6.8% vs 9.9%, p < 0.001). RP procedures have decreased over time in all groups, but the relative decrease was less pronounced as resident complement increased (79.5% vs 73.3% vs 64.7%, p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in adjusted 30-day all-cause mortality between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Increased resident complement at VA hospitals is associated with increased resident autonomy in resident primary procedures. Resident autonomy has decreased over time regardless of complement size, but it is less dramatic at sites with more residents. Increasing resident complement at a site may improve operative autonomy, leading to an improved educational experience for surgical residents.

Closing the Gap: Evaluation of Gender Disparities in Urology Resident Operative Autonomy and Performance.

OBJECTIVE: Gender disparities have demonstrated influence on several areas of medical trainee academic performance and surgeon professional attainment. The impact of gender on perceived operative autonomy and performance of urology residents is not well understood. This single-institution pilot study explores this relationship by evaluating urology faculty and resident assessment of resident operative autonomy and performance using the Society for Improving Medical Professional Learning app. DESIGN: Using Society for Improving Medical Professional Learning, trainees in a single urology residency program were assessed in operative cases on three scales (autonomy, performance, and case complexity). Intraoperative assessments were completed by both faculty and residents (self-evaluation). Respective evaluations were compared to explore differences in ratings by gender. SETTING: University of Michigan Health, Ann Arbor, MI. PARTICIPANTS: University of Michigan Urology Residents and Faculty. RESULTS: A total of 516 evaluations were submitted from 18 urology residents and 20 urology faculty. Self-reported ratings among female and male residents did not differ significantly for autonomy (p = 0.20) or performance (p = 0.82). Female and male residents received overall similar autonomy ratings that were not significantly different from female faculty (p = 0.66) and male faculty (p = 0.81). For female residents, there was no significant difference in performance ratings by faculty gender (p = 0.20). This finding was consistent when the resident was male (p = 0.70). CONCLUSIONS: At our institution, there is no overall gender-based difference in self-rated or faculty-rated operative autonomy or performance among urology trainees. Understanding relevant facets of institutional culture as well as educational strategies between faculty and residents may identify factors contributing to this outcome.

General Surgical Resident Operative Autonomy vs Patient Outcomes: Are we Compromising Training without Net Benefit to Hospitals or Patients?

OBJECTIVE: Resident operative autonomy has been steadily declining. The reasons are multifactorial and include concerns related to patient safety and operating room efficiency. Simultaneously, faculty have expressed that residents are less prepared for independent practice. We sought to understand the effect of decreasing resident autonomy on patient outcomes and operative duration. DESIGN: Retrospective study utilizing the Veterans Affairs Surgical Quality Improvement Program (VASQIP) database. SETTING: Operative cases within the VASQIP database from July 1, 2004-September 30, 2019 were analyzed. PARTICIPANTS: All adult patients who underwent a surgical procedure from July 1, 2004 to September 30, 2019 were analyzed. The subpopulation of patients that underwent a surgical procedure in General Surgery or Peripheral Vascular Surgery were identified based on the code of the specialty surgeon. Within these subgroups, the most frequent cases by current procedural terminology (CPT) code were selected for study inclusion. The principle CPT code of all cases was further coded by level of supervision: attending primary surgeon (AP); attending and resident (AR), or resident primary with the attending supervising but not scrubbed (RP). Baseline demographics, operative variables, and outcomes were compared between groups. RESULTS: The VASQIP database included 698,391 total general/vascular surgery cases. 38,483 (6%) of them were RP cases. Analysis revealed that the top 5 RP cases account for 73% of total RP volume-these include: 1) Hernias (55% total; 33% open inguinal, 13% umbilical, 5% open ventral/incisional, and 4% laparoscopic) 2) cholecystectomy (18%), 3) Amputations (17% total; 10% above knee, 7% below knee), 4) Appendectomy (7%) and 5) Open colectomy (3%). The percentage of cases at teaching hospitals that were RP cases significantly decreased from 15% in 2004 to 5% in 2019 (p < 0.001). RP cases were generally sicker as demonstrated by higher ASA classifications and more likely to be emergent cases. Operative times were also increased with resident involvement, but RP cases were faster than AR cases on average. After adjusting for baseline demographics, case type, and year of procedure, mortality was no different between groups. Complications were higher in the AR group but not in the RP group. CONCLUSIONS: The rate of resident autonomy in routine general surgery cases has decreased by two-thirds over the 15-year study period. Cases performed by residents without an attending surgeon scrubbed were performed faster than cases performed by a resident and attending together and there was no increase in patient morbidity or mortality when residents performed cases independently. The erosion of resident autonomy is not justified based upon operative time or patient outcomes. Efforts to increase surgical resident operative autonomy are needed.

Expectations versus reality: trainee participation on the robotic console in academic surgery.

INTRODUCTION: Trainees underestimate the amount of operative autonomy they receive, whereas faculty overestimate; this has not been studied in robotics. We aimed to assess the perceptions and expectations of our general surgery trainees and faculty on robotic console participation in academic surgery. METHODS: A survey was administered to general surgery robotic faculty and trainees eligible to sit at the console. Participants estimated the average percentage of trainee console participation time (CPT) per case for robotic cholecystectomies (CCY) and inguinal hernia repairs (IHR) from January to June 2019. Trainees were additionally asked what CPT they expected according to their training level (novice or senior). Expected CPTs were compared to actual CPTs extracted from robotic console logs during the same time frame. RESULTS: Survey response rate was 80% for faculty (4 of 5) and 65% for trainees (15 of 23). Novices expected a higher CPT than they perceived in CCY (42.8% ± 14.8% vs 19.0% ± 17.2%, p = 0.03) and IHR (36.1% ± 17.6% vs. 10.7% ± 13.7%, p = 0.01), but in actuality, they did more CPT than perceived (by 34.9% in CCY, p < 0.01; 14% in IHR, p = 0.10). Senior trainees accurately perceived their CPT in IHR, but expected a higher CPT by 15.9% (p = 0.04). In CCY, seniors perceived a 23.8% higher CPT than in reality (p = 0.04). Faculty generally overperceived trainee CPT by 12.8-16.3% (p > 0.05). Compared to faculty, novices perceived lower CPTs in both CCY by 29.9% (p = 0.16) and IHR by 26.8% (p = 0.07), but seniors tended to agree with the faculty-perceived CPTs (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Our robotic trainees expect to do more on the console than they perceive. Faculty think they allow their trainees more participation than in reality. Compared to faculty perception, novice trainees perceive a much lower level of trainee participation than senior trainees do. Expectation setting and standardizing learning curves are important for robotic surgery training.

A longitudinal cadaver-based simulation curriculum creates sustainable increases in resident confidence and exposure to fundamental techniques: Results of a 5-year program evaluation.

INTRODUCTION: For the past five years, our surgical residency program has led a cadaver-based simulation course focused on fundamental surgical maneuvers. This study aimed to quantify the impact of this course on resident exposure to surgical skills and longitudinal impact on resident education. METHODS: General surgery residents participated in an annual cadaver-based simulation curriculum. Participants completed surveys regarding improvements in knowledge and confidence; these results were stratified between course iterations (P1: 2 years, 2014-15; P2: 3 years, 2016-2018). RESULTS: Residents reported a sustained increase in knowledge of anatomy and technical dissection, confidence in performing operative skills independently, and exposure to operative skills that were otherwise not encountered in clinical rotations. Junior residents demonstrated an increase in gaining skills they would otherwise not achieve (87% vs. 98%, p = 0.028) and confidence to safely perform these procedures in the clinical setting (94% vs. 100%, p = 0.077). CONCLUSION: This annual, longitudinal cadaver-based skills course focused on fundamental maneuvers demonstrates a sustained impact in resident and faculty surgical confidence in resident's operative skills as a component of a longitudinal simulation curriculum to enhance competency-based promotion.

Gender perception bias of operative autonomy evaluations among residents and faculty in general surgery training.

BACKGROUND: Resident operative autonomy (ROA) is critical and a shared responsibility of both faculty and residents during training. We hypothesize that there is a perception of gender bias in residents' performance as evaluated by faculty and residents. METHOD: Over a period of five academic years, between July 2014 and June 2019, ROA was evaluated using the Zwisch score. Reciprocal evaluations were completed by faculty and residents. RESULTS: 39 surgeons (30 males, 9 females) and 42 residents (25 males, 15 females) completed 2360 evaluations (1180 by faculty, and a matched number by residents). PGY level was significantly associated with granting a higher level of autonomy. Gender of residents didn't affect the level of granted autonomy as evaluated by faculty. However, on self-evaluations, female residents rated their degree of autonomy lower than that of their male counterparts. CONCLUSION: Gender did not influence the perception of autonomy granted as evaluated by faculty. However, on self-evaluations, female residents reported a lower degree of autonomy received.

The Role of Manual Dexterity and Cognitive Functioning in Enhancing Resident Operative Autonomy.

INTRODUCTION: Autonomy, both operative and nonoperative, is one of the most critical aspects of successful surgical training. Both surgeon and resident share the responsibility of achieving this goal. We hypothesize that operative autonomy is distinct and depends, for the most part, on the resident's manual dexterity, knowledge of, and preparation for the procedure. METHODS: Over a period of 4 academic years, between July 2014 and June 2018, a total of 958 Global Rating Scale of Operative Performance evaluations were completed by 32 general and subspecialty faculty surgeons for 35 residents. Elective procedures were evaluated, including 165 (17.2%) by postgraduate year (PGY)1 residents, 253 (26.4%) by PGY2, 199 (20.8%) by PGY3, 147 (15.3%) by PGY4, and 194 (20.3%) by PGY5. The procedures evaluated were: 261 (27.2%) hernia repairs; 178 (18.6%) cholecystectomies; 102 (10.6%) colorectal and anal procedures; 73 (7.6%) vascular procedures; 56 (5.8%) thyroid and parathyroidectomies; 39 (4.1%) foregut (esophagus and stomach) procedures; 38 (4%) skin, soft tissue, and breast; 92 (10%) hepatopancreatic; 20 (2.1%) pediatric procedures; and 99 (10.3%) other procedures including amputations, cardiothoracic, and solid organs procedures. Each resident was scored from 1 to 5 (1 lowest, 5 highest) in each of the following categories of Global Rating Scale of Operative Performance: respect for tissue (RT), time and motion (T&M), instrument handling (IH), knowledge of the instrument (KI), flow of operation (FO) and resident's preparation for the procedure (RP). Resident operative autonomy (ROA) was assessed using the Zwisch scale, a 4-point scale describing faculty supervision behaviors associated with different degrees of resident autonomy (1: Show and Tell, 2: Active Help, 3: Passive Help, and 4: Supervision Only). RESULTS: Correlation and ordinal regression analyses were conducted to examine the relationship between ROA and manual dexterity (RT, T&M, IH, and FO), and cognitive functioning (knowledge of instruments and resident preparation). Results indicated a positive correlation between ROA and RT (r = 0.528, p < 0.001), T&M (r = 0.630, p < 0.001), IH (r = 0.597, p < 0.001), KI (r = 0.490, p < 0.001), FO (r = 0.637, p < 0.001), and RP (r = 0.525, p < 0.001). Additionally, there was a weak inverse correlation between ROA and the number of years the surgeon had been in practice (r = -0.127, p = 0.001). The significant predictors of resident autonomy found by the ordinal logistic regression include time and motion (p < 0.001), flow of operation (p < 0.001), and resident's preparation for the procedure (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Resident operative autonomy is a product of shared responsibility between the faculty and resident. However, residents' inherent and/or acquired skills and preparation for the operative procedures play a critical role. Residents should be advised to use available resources such as simulation to augment their skills preoperatively and to enhance their autonomy in the operating room.

Progressive Surgical Autonomy Observed in a Hand Surgery Resident Clinic Model.

OBJECTIVE: Resident clinics (RCs) are intended to catalyze the achievement of educational milestones through progressively autonomous patient care. However, few studies quantify their effect on competency-based surgical education, and no previous publications focus on hand surgery RCs (HRCs). We demonstrate the achievement of progressive surgical autonomy in an HRC model. DESIGN: A retrospective review of all patients seen in a weekly half-day HRC from October 2010 to October 2015 was conducted. Investigators compiled data on patient demographics, provider encounters, operational statistics, operative details, and dictated surgical autonomy on an ascending 5 point scoring system. SETTING: A tertiary hand surgery referral center. RESULTS: A total of 2295 HRC patients were evaluated during the study period in 5173 clinic visits. There was an average of 22.6 patients per clinic, including 9.0 new patients with 6.5 emergency room referrals. Totally, 825 operations were performed by 39 residents. Trainee autonomy averaged 2.1/5 (standard deviation [SD] = 1.2), 3.4/5 (SD = 1.3), 2.1/5 (SD = 1.3), 3.4/5 (SD = 1.2), 3.2/5 (SD = 1.5), 3.5/5 (SD = 1.5), 4.0/5 (SD = 1.2), 4.1/5 (SD = 1.2), in postgraduate years 1 to 8, respectively. Linear mixed model analysis demonstrated training level significantly effected operative autonomy (p = 0.0001). Continuity of care was maintained in 79.3% of cases, and patients were followed an average of 3.9 clinic encounters over 12.4 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: Our HRC appears to enable surgical trainees to practice supervised autonomous surgical care and provide a forum in which to observe progressive operative competency achievement during hand surgery training. Future studies comparing HRC models to non-RC models will be required to further define quality-of-care delivery within RCs.

How can surgeons facilitate resident intraoperative decision-making?

BACKGROUND: Cognitive skills such as decision-making are critical to developing operative autonomy. We explored resident decision-making using a recollection of specific examples, from the attending surgeon and resident, after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. METHODS: In a separate semi-structured interview, the attending and resident both answered five questions, regarding the resident's operative roles and decisions, ways the attending helped, times when the attending operated, and the effect of the relationship between attending and resident. Themes were extracted using inductive methods. RESULTS: Thirty interviews were completed after 15 cases. Facilitators of decision-making included dialogue, safe struggle, and appreciation for retraction. Aberrant case characteristics, anatomic uncertainties, and time pressures provided barriers. Attending-resident mismatches included descriptions of transitioning control to the attending. CONCLUSIONS: Reciprocal dialogue, including concept-driven feedback, is helpful during intraoperative teaching. Unanticipated findings impede resident decision-making, and we describe differences in understanding transfers of operative control. Given these factors, we suggest that pre-operative discussions may be beneficial.