ABSTRACT
Increased intracranial pressure is the most common cause of papilledema. Multiple etiologies such as cerebral edema, hydrocephalus, space occupying lesions, infection, and idiopathic intracranial hypertension among others should be considered. Imaging plays a critical role in the detection of pathologies that can cause papilledema. MRI with contrast and CE-MRV, in particular, are key for the diagnosis of idiopathic intracranial hypertension. This review will focus in common and infrequent causes of papilledema, the role of imaging in patients with papilledema as well as its potential mimickers.
Subject(s)
Papilledema , Pseudotumor Cerebri , Diagnosis, Differential , Humans , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/adverse effects , Papilledema/diagnostic imaging , Papilledema/etiology , Pseudotumor Cerebri/complications , Pseudotumor Cerebri/diagnostic imagingABSTRACT
Abstract In children, optic disc drusen (ODD) are often mistaken for papilledema, this being the prin-cipal differential diagnosis. This report describes the case of an 11-year old patient with ODD, in which the condition was initially diagnosed as papilledema, and the patient referred for pulse therapy. Fundoscopic examination is important because it is the first examination conducted by the ophthalmologist that is capable of revealing some characteristics of ODD that will aid in the differentiation between this disease and papilledema. In cases of ODD, the optic disc presents blurred margins and elevation of the disc borders, with clearly defined vessels at the papilla border. The differential diagnosis of ODD in children is challenging and requires appropriate management and follow-up to avoid iatrogenesis.
Resumo As drusas de disco óptico (DDO) em crianças são frequentemente confundidas com papiledema, sendo este o principal diagnóstico diferencial. Este artigo relata o caso de uma paciente de 11 anos com DDO, no qual o quadro foi inicialmente diagnosticado como papiledema, e a paciente encaminhada para pulsoterapia. O exame fundoscópico é importante por ser o primeiro exame realizado pelo oftalmologista que é capaz de revelar algumas características das DDO que auxiliarão na diferenciação do papiledema. Nos casos de DDO, o disco óptico apresenta margens mal definidas e bordas elevadas, com vasos na margem da papila bem definidos. O diagnóstico diferencial das DDO em crianças é desafiador e requer conduta e seguimento adequados para evitar iatrogenias.
Subject(s)
Humans , Female , Child , Optic Disk Drusen/diagnostic imaging , Papilledema/diagnostic imaging , Ultrasonography , Diagnosis, DifferentialABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Sudden visual loss and optic disc edema caused by optic neuritis (ON) is usually followed by significant visual recovery. However, little or no recovery occurs when the loss is caused by atypical ON, especially in patients with neuromyelitis optica (NMO). Optic disc drusen (ODD) is a cause of pseudo optic disc edema and may be a predisposing factor for non-arteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy (NAION), thereby mimicking atypical ON. In such cases, if globular concretions are seen protruding from the disc substance, ODD may be suspected. The purpose of this paper is to describe two patients with acute visual loss followed by optic disc atrophy initially labeled as atypical ON. Though not suspected on clinical examination, optical coherence tomography (OCT) revealed deeply buried ODD as a predisposing factor for NAION. CASE PRESENTATIONS: Case 1: A 48-year-old woman had bilateral sequential visual loss associated with optic disc edema. Despite treatment, vision did not improve and severe disc pallor ensued. Atypical ON was suspected. Eventually, she was started on immunosuppressant therapy based on a tentative diagnosis of NMO-spectrum disorder. On examination 5 years later, only severe optic disc pallor was observed, but OCT radial B-scans showed ovoid hyporeflective areas in the retrolaminar region of both eyes, compatible with ODD; this led to a diagnosis of NAION and deeply buried ODD. Case 2. A 35-year-old woman with suspicion of ON in the left eye and a history of previous atypical ON in the right eye was referred for neuro-ophthalmic examination which revealed diffuse optic disc pallor and a dense arcuate visual field defect in the right eye. OCT B-scans passing through the disc showed large ovoid areas of reduced reflectivity in the retrolaminar region of the optic disc in the right eye. These findings helped confirm the diagnosis of NAION in one eye, with deeply buried ODD as predisposing factor. CONCLUSIONS: Deeply buried ODD may be associated with NAION causing irreversible visual loss and optic disc pallor, a condition easily mistaken for atypical ON. Awareness of such occurrence is important to avoid unnecessary testing and minimize the risk of mismanagement.
Subject(s)
Blindness/etiology , Optic Atrophy/complications , Optic Disk Drusen/complications , Papilledema/etiology , Tomography, Optical Coherence/methods , Visual Acuity , Adult , Blindness/diagnosis , Blindness/physiopathology , Diagnosis, Differential , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Middle Aged , Optic Atrophy/diagnosis , Optic Disk , Optic Disk Drusen/diagnosis , Optic Neuritis/diagnosis , Papilledema/diagnosisABSTRACT
Optic disc drusen (ODD) is the accumulations of calcified hyaline-like material within the substance of the optic nerve head. Optic disc drusen, especially if it is bilateral, may mimic the clinical presentation of papilledema. Usually retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thinning can be present in ODD. In this report we present uncommon RNFL changes in a patient with bilateral ODD. A 17-year-old male was referred by another center with a diagnosis of optic disc edema. The patients visual acuity, the slit-lamp examination and the intraocular pressures were normal in both eyes. On fundus examination, there were irregularly elevated discs bilaterally and the optic nerves appear with hazy disk margins. He did not have visual field defects in automated perimetry. Bilateral ODD were identified and confirmed by B-scan ultrasonography and optical coherence tomography (OCT) demonstrated 4 clock hours of RNFL thickening. Optic disc drusen may be misdiagnosed as papilledema. Thus, clinical suspicion of ODD is important in order to diagnose papilledema and prevents unnecessary interventions. Although most of eyes with ODD have normal or thinner RNFL thickness, some of these eyes can have thicker RNFL thickness.
As drusas do disco óptico (DDO) são depósitos de material hialino calcificado dentro da substância da cabeça do nervo óptico. Drusas do disco óptico, especialmente se for bilateral, podem apresentar o quadro clínico de edema de papila. Usualmente o espessamento da camada de fibras nervosas da retina (RCFN) podem estar presentes em DDO. Neste relato apresentamos o caso de um homem com 17 anos de idade que foi encaminhado por um outro centro, com o diagnóstico de edema do disco óptico. A acuidade visual do paciente, o exame de lâmpada de fenda e a pressão intraocular foram normais em ambos os olhos. No exame de fundo de olho havia discos elevados de forma irregular bilateralmente e os nervos ópticos com margens de disco nebulosas. Ele não tinha defeitos do campo visual em perimetria computadorizada. Drusas do disco óptico (DDO) bilateral foram identificados e confirmados pela ultrassonografia Bscan e tomografia de coerência óptica (TCO) que demonstraram 4 horas de relógio de RCFN com espessamento. As drusas do disco óptico podem ser diagnosticadas como papiledema. Assim, a suspeita clínica de DDO é importante a fim de evitar intervenções desnecessárias. Embora a maioria dos olhos com DDO têm espessura normal ou thinner RCFN, alguns desses olhos podem ter camada mais grossa na RCFN.