Typing diagnostic value of 68Ga-pentixafor PET/CT for patients with primary aldosteronism and unilateral nodules.

PURPOSE: Our goal was to compare the lateralization of 68Ga-pentixafor PET/CT with adrenal vein sampling (AVS) in primary aldosteronism (PA) patients with unilateral lesions. METHODS: We retrospectively enrolled 61 patients with PA and all patients showed unilateral nodular lesions on CT and underwent 68Ga-Pentixafor PET/CT. The general clinical data, imaging and AVS results were collected. The diagnostic efficiency of 68Ga-Pentixafor PET/CT imaging in PA patients was calculated by visual and semi-quantitative analysis to compare the consistency with AVS, and the correlation between CXCR4 express and 68Ga-Pentixafor uptake was performed. RESULTS: The study included 42 unilateral PA (UPA) and 19 bilateral PA (BPA). The area under curve (AUC) of 68Ga-Pentixafor PET/CT to diagnosis UPA with 10 min maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) > 8.17 was 0.82 ([0.70-0.90], P < 0.001), and the sensitivity and specificity were 0.64 and 0.90, respectively. The maximal AUC of 68Ga-pentixafor PET/CT for the diagnosis UPA in patients with nodules with a diameter ≥1 cm was 0.87 ([0.73-0.95],P both <0.001,[10 min SUVmax=8.17 and 10 min mean standardized uptake value (SUVmean)=5.57]), and the sensitivity and specificity were 0.73 and 0.93, respectively. Unilateral adrenalectomy and significant CXCR4 expression were present in 32 UPA, including 27 aldosterone-producing adenoma and 5 idiopathic adrenal hyperplasia. Additionally, 68Ga-pentixafor uptake in adrenal lesions was significantly correlated with CXCR4 expression, and statistical differences in 68Ga-pentixafor uptake among IRS subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: 68Ga-Pentixafor PET/CT can be helpful for subtyping diagnosis of PA patients with unilateral adrenal nodular, showing significant potential in non-invasive PA classification.

Chemokine Receptor 4-Targeted PET/CT with [68Ga]pentixather in Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma: a Comparative Study with [68Ga]pentixafor PET/CT.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to compare the detection rate of [68Ga]pentixather PET/CT and [68Ga]pentixafor PET/CT in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) patients, and to explore the value of [68Ga]pentixather PET/CT for tumor load assessment. METHODS: Nineteen NDMM Patients were prospectively recruited and underwent both [68Ga]pentixather PET/CT and [68Ga]pentixafor PET/CT. A positive PET scan was defined as the presence of PET-positive focal bone lesions, paraskeletal disease, extramedullary plasmacytoma, or diffuse bone marrow uptake. Lesion numbers, SUVmax and PET-related tumor burden values were compared. The correlations between PET-related tumor burden and clinical risk stratification were analyzed. RESULTS: [68Ga]pentixather PET/CT showed a tendency of higher positive rate compared with [68Ga]pentixafor PET/CT [94.7% (18/19) vs. 78.9% (15/19), p > 0.05]. Among 14 patients with 151 matched focal bone lesions, [68Ga]pentixather PET detected more or equal number of lesions in 13 patients, and demonstrated higher uptake value than 68 Ga-pentixafor PET [SUVmax, 16.8 (9.0, 23.8) vs. 13.4 (6.5, 20.4), p < 0.001]. For PET related-tumor burden, positive correlations of total bone marrow uptake (TBmU) (r = 0.9540, p < 0.0001) and SUVmean of total bone marrow (r = 0.9632, p < 0.0001) in two PET scans were observed. Higher TBmU [7864.9 (5549.2, 11,616.2) vs. 5383.4(4102.7, 11,041.8), p < 0.001], SUVmean of total bone marrow [1.4 (1.1, 2.2) vs. 1.1 (0.7, 2.1), p < 0.001] were demonstrated on [68Ga]pentixather PET than [68Ga]pentixafor PET. And the level of TBmU in [68Ga]pentixather PET and [68Ga]pentixafor PET were both elevated in Durie-Salmon Staging (DSS) III than DSS I (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: [68Ga]pentixather PET/CT performed a non-inferior capability for tumor detection compared to [68Ga]pentixafor PET/CT in NDMM patients. [68Ga]pentixather PET/CT can assess tumor load in MM patients and depict a significantly higher PET-related total tumor burden than [68Ga]pentixafor PET/CT.

An in vivo tumour organoid model based on the chick embryonic chorioallantoic membrane mimics key characteristics of the patient tissue: a proof-of-concept study.

BACKGROUND: Patient-derived tumour organoids (PDOs) are highly advanced in vitro models for disease modelling, yet they lack vascularisation. To overcome this shortcoming, organoids can be inoculated onto the chorioallantoic membrane (CAM); the highly vascularised, not innervated extraembryonic membrane of fertilised chicken eggs. Therefore, we aimed to (1) establish a CAM patient-derived xenograft (PDX) model based on PDOs generated from the liver metastasis of a colorectal cancer (CRC) patient and (2) to evaluate the translational pipeline (patient - in vitro PDOs - in vivo CAM-PDX) regarding morphology, histopathology, expression of C-X-C chemokine receptor type 4 (CXCR4), and radiotracer uptake patterns. RESULTS: The main liver metastasis of the CRC patient exhibited high 2-[18F]FDG uptake and moderate and focal [68Ga]Ga-Pentixafor accumulation in the peripheral part of the metastasis. Inoculation of PDOs derived from this region onto the CAM resulted in large, highly viable, and extensively vascularised xenografts, as demonstrated immunohistochemically and confirmed by high 2-[18F]FDG uptake. The xenografts showed striking histomorphological similarity to the patient's liver metastasis. The moderate expression of CXCR4 was maintained in ovo and was concordant with the expression levels of the patient's sample and in vitro PDOs. Following in vitro re-culturing of CAM-PDXs, growth, and [68Ga]Ga-Pentixafor uptake were unaltered compared to PDOs before transplantation onto the CAM. Although [68Ga]Ga-Pentixafor was taken up into CAM-PDXs, the uptake in the baseline and blocking group were comparable and there was only a trend towards blocking. CONCLUSIONS: We successfully established an in vivo CAM-PDX model based on CRC PDOs. The histomorphological features and target protein expression of the original patient's tissue were mirrored in the in vitro PDOs, and particularly in the in vivo CAM-PDXs. The [68Ga]Ga-Pentixafor uptake patterns were comparable between in vitro, in ovo and clinical data and 2-[18F]FDG was avidly taken up in the patient's liver metastasis and CAM-PDXs. We thus propose the CAM-PDX model as an alternative in vivo model with promising translational value for CRC patients.

Chemokine Receptor-4 Targeted PET/CT Imaging with 68Ga-Pentixafor in Head and Neck Cancer-A Comparison with 18F-FDG and CXCR4 Immunohistochemistry.

BACKGROUND: Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is common, and its incidence is increasing, particularly in HIV-infected individuals who present with more aggressive disease. Despite aggressive treatment, the prognosis remains poor because of resistance to chemoradiation therapy. So far, studies report very low [68Ga]Ga-Pentixafor avidity in HNSCC. This study investigated the diagnostic performance of CXCR4-directed imaging of carcinoma of the oral cavity, oropharynx, and nasopharynx with positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) using the radiolabelled chemokine ligand [68Ga]Ga-Pentixafor and explored its ability to quantify CXCR4 expression in vivo. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this prospective cross-sectional study, twenty-three (23) patients aged 52.9 ± 10.4 (19.6), 17 males and 6 females with primarily diagnosed (n = 17) or pre-treated (n = 6) SCC of the oral cavity (OCSCC, n = 11), oropharynx (OPSCC, n = 9), nasopharynx (NPSCC, n = 2) and unknown primary (n = 1) underwent imaging with [68Ga]Ga-Pentixafor-PET/CT. In 16/23 patients 2-[18F]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose ([18F]F-FDG) served as a standard reference. All lesions were visually rated using a 5-point Likert scale. For both tracers, maximum standardized uptake values (SUVmax) and the total lesion uptake (TLU) were recorded and compared using the Wilcox-signed rank test. In addition, the tumor-to-background ratios were derived using the liver (TLR), spleen (TSR), and posterior cervical muscles (TMR) as background. The relationships between the SUVs of the two tracers were assessed using the Spearman correlation. CXCR4 immunohistochemistry (IHC) staining was correlated with 68Ga-Pentixafor-PET/CT in 21/23 patients. RESULTS: Ninety-one percent (21/23) of tumors were visually detected on [68Ga]Ga-Pentixafor; however, [68Ga]Ga-Pentixafor was less intense compared with [18F]F-FDG-PET. Quantitative analysis showed higher [18F]F-FDG SUVmax in comparison with [68Ga]Ga-Pentixafor (16 ± 6.7 vs. 5.8 ± 2.6 g/mL, p = 0.011) and SUVmean (9.3 ± 4.1 vs. 3± 1.6 g/mL, p < 0.001) and TBR 4.9 ± 2.3 vs. 2.36 ± 1.4 p = 0.014. Nasopharyngeal cancer demonstrated more intense tracer accumulation than oropharyngeal and oral cavity malignancies. CXCR4 IHC staining was positive in 15/21 patients, and there was a statistically significant correlation between IHC staining and [68Ga]Ga-Pentixafor SUVmean r = 0.5 p = 0.027, and performance status r = 0.83 p = 0.0104. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, although [68Ga]Ga-Pentixafor cannot replace [18F]F-FDG as a diagnostic tool because of its lower avidity, the correlation between CXCR4 targeted 68Ga-Pentixafor PET imaging and CXCR4 IHC staining indicates the potential of 68Ga-Pentixafor as an effective tool for selecting patients who may benefit from therapies targeting CXCR4. In addition, [68Ga]Ga-Pentixafor has no physiological brown fat uptake, which often obscures cervical lesions on [18F]F-FDG PET/CT imaging.

Clinical value of 68Ga-pentixafor PET/CT in patients with primary aldosteronism and bilateral lesions: preliminary results of a single-centre study.

BACKGROUND: Subtype diagnosis of primary aldosteronism (PA) is used to determine treatment, and the potential utility of 68Ga-pentixafor PET/CT for investigation of PA has long been recognized. The study aimed to evaluate the clinical value of 68Ga-pentixafor PET/CT in the diagnosis and prognosis of patients with bilateral lesions identified by CT. METHODS: In total, 25 patients with PA and bilateral lesions on CT were retrospectively evaluated. All patients underwent 68Ga-Pentixafor PET/CT and adrenal vein sampling. The analysis focused on establishing the relationship between bilateral adrenal lesions SUVmax and the ratio of bilateral adrenal lesions SUVmax (CON) and clinical diagnosis, treatment outcomes, and KCNJ5 gene status. RESULTS: The concordance rate between 68Ga-Pentixafor PET/CT and adrenal venous sampling was 65.2% (15/23). The lateralization results of 68Ga-pentixafor PET/CT supported the clinical decisions of 20 patients with PA, 90% of whom showed effectiveness in treatment. The SUVmax on the dominant side of the surgically treated patients was higher than that of patients treated with drugs. The SUVmax of the KCNJ5 mutant group was higher than that of the KCNJ5 wild group, and 68Ga-Pentixafor uptake was correlated with KCNJ5 gene status. CONCLUSIONS: 68Ga-Pentixafor PET/CT proves beneficial for patients with PA with bilateral lesions on CT. The treatment is generally effective based on the results of PET lateralization. Simultaneously, a certain relationship exists between 68Ga-Pentixafor PET/CT and KCNJ5 gene status, warranting further analysis.

On the Optimization of the Protocol for Automated Radiosyntheses of [68Ga]Ga-Pentixafor, [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-4 and [68Ga]Ga-DOTATATE in a Modular-Lab Standard.

Objectives: The present work describes the automated radiochemical synthesis of different PET tracers like [68Ga]Ga-Pentixafor, [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-4 and [68Ga]Ga-DOTATATE using optimized single protocol in the non-cassette based Eckert & Ziegler (EZ) Modular Lab (fixed tubing system) without any modification in the inbuilt human machine interface (HMI) software. Recently, PET agents viz. [68Ga]Ga-Pentixafor and [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-4 are gaining prominence for the diagnosis of overexpressed Chemokine Receptor-4 (CXCR4) and Fibroblast Activation Protein (FAP) receptor, respectively, in the microenvironment of numerous cancer types. The promising results observed with the clinical usage of [68Ga]Ga-DOTATATE produced using the automated protocol, provided impetus for the clinical translation of [68Ga]Ga-Pentixafor and [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-4 using the in-house developed automated radiolabeling protocol. Methods: Herein we report a single radiolabeling protocol for the automated preparation of [68Ga]Ga-Pentixafor and [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-4 in the non-cassette based EZ Modular-Lab Standard radiochemistry module, without any changes in schematic, graphical user interface (GUI) software and time list, from that used for routine production of [68Ga]Ga-DOTATATE in our centre, since 2015. Physico-chemical quality control and in-vitro stability analyses were carried out using radio-TLC and radio-HPLC. Results: The automated protocol yielded reliable and consistent non-decay corrected (ndc) radiochemical yield (RCY) of (84.4%±0.9%) and (85.5%±1.4%) respectively, for [68Ga]Ga-Pentixafor and [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-4, with RCP>98%, which are comparable to the RCY of (84.4%±1.2%) and RCP (99.1%±0.3%) for [68Ga]Ga-DOTATATE. The biological quality control studies confirmed the formulations to be of ready-to-use pharmaceutical grade. Conclusion: The consistent and reliable RCY and RCP of multiple 68Ga-labeled PET tracers by single automated radiochemistry protocol exhibits the versatility of the EZ Modular Lab.

68Ga-pentixafor PET/CT in the localization diagnosis of primary aldosteronism concurrent subclinical cushing's syndrsome: two case reports.

PURPOSE: Adrenal venous sampling (AVS) is recommended for subtyping primary aldosteronism (PA). However, in cases of PA, concurrent subclinical Cushing's syndrome (SCS) has the potential to confound AVS results. Pentixafor, a CXC chemokine receptor type 4-specific ligand, has been reported as a promising marker to evaluate functional nature of adrenal adenomas. This study aims to investigate the clinical value of Gallium-68 Pentixafor Positron Emission Tomography-Computed Tomography (68Ga-Pentixafor PET/CT) in the localization diagnosis of patients with PA plus SCS. METHODS: Two patients with a confirmed diagnosis of PA plus SCS underwent AVS and 68Ga-Pentixafor PET/CT. RESULTS: AVS results revealed no lateralization for both patients while 68Ga-Pentixafor PET/CT showed a unilateral adrenal nodule with increased uptake of 68Ga-Pentixafor. Unilateral adrenalectomy was performed based on the results of 68Ga-Pentixafor PET/CT. Subsequently, complete biochemical remission of autonomous aldosterone and cortisol secretion were achieved in both cases. CONCLUSIONS: 68Ga-Pentixafor PET/CT shows promising potential for the localization of aldosterone and cortisol co-secreting adrenal adenoma in patients with PA plus SCS.

Prospective Phase II Study of Radiotherapy Dose Escalation in Grade 4 Glioma Using 68Ga-Pentixafor PET Scan.

AIMS: Local failure remains the major concern in grade 4 glioma or glioblastoma (GBM). Pilot studies have shown a radiotherapy (RT) dose-response relationship in GBM. Here we present our preliminary data of RT dose escalation using 68Ga-Pentixafor PET scan. High 68Ga-pentixafor uptake in glioma cells helps in sharp demarcation between tumour and normal brain. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This phase II prospective study was conducted from 2018 to 2020. Thirty, biopsy-proven cases of grade 4 glioma were included. All patients underwent post-operative MRI of the brain and 68Ga-Pentixafor PET scan. RT was planned in 2-phases. Phase-1 GTV (GTV1) comprised of T2/flair abnormality, PET-avid disease and post-op cavity. A margin of 2cm was given to GTV-1 to create phase-1 CTV (CTV1), which was further expanded to 0.5cm to generate phase-1 PTV (PTV1). A radiation dose of 46Gy/23fr was prescribed to PTV-1. Phase-2 GTV (GTV2) consisted of CT/MRI contrast-enhancing lesion, PET avid disease and post-op cavity. A margin of 0.5 cm was given to GTV2 to create phase-2 CTV (CTV2) which was expanded to 0.5 cm to create phase-2 PTV (PTV2). RT dose of 14 Gy/7 fr was prescribed to PTV2. PET avid disease was delineated as GTV PET and a margin of 3mm was given to generate PTV-PET which received escalated RT dose of 21 Gy/7fr by simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) in phase 2 (Total dose to PTV PET = 67 Gy/30 fr). All patients received concurrent and adjuvant temozolomide. The data was prospectively maintained in Microsoft Excel sheet. SPSS v 23 was used for statistical analysis. The primary endpoints were estimation of the overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), and secondary endpoint was to measure the incidence of radiation necrosis. Categorical variables were reported as frequency and percentage and quantitative variables were reported as median and range. RESULTS: Data from thirty patients were analysed. A median OS of 23 months was observed with estimated 1, 2 and 3 years OS of 90%, 40% and 17.8% respectively. A significant association of OS was seen with the extent of surgery (p = 0.04) and kernofsky performance status (p = 0.007). No patient developed significant radiation necrosis. CONCLUSIONS: The index study did not show any survival benefit from dose escalation RT. However, all of the patients tolerated the treatment well and none of them developed radiation necrosis. Considering the small sample size as a limitation of the index study, the role of 68Ga-pentixafor PET scan for radiation dose escalation should be further explored. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: CTRI/2019/05/019146.

The Clinical Role of CXCR4-Targeted PET on Lymphoproliferative Disorders: A Systematic Review.

Background/Objectives: We conducted a comprehensive investigation to explore the pathological expression of the CXCR4 receptor in lymphoproliferative disorders (LPDs) using [68Ga]Ga-Pentixafor PET/CT or PET/MRI technology. The PICO question was as follows: What is the diagnostic role (outcome) of [68Ga]Ga-Pentixafor PET (intervention) in patients with LPDs (problem/population)? Methods: The study was written based on the reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines, and it was registered on the prospective register of systematic reviews (PROSPERO) website (CRD42024506866). A comprehensive computer literature search of Scopus, MEDLINE, Scholar, and Embase databases was conducted, including articles indexed up to February 2024. To the methodological evaluation of the studies used the quality assessment of diagnosis accuracy studies-2 (QUADAS-2) tool. Results: Of the 8380 records discovered, 23 were suitable for systematic review. Fifteen studies (on 571 LPD patients) focused on diagnosis and staging, and eight trials (194 LPD patients) assessed treatment response. Conclusions: The main conclusions that can be inferred from the published studies are as follows: (a) [68Ga]Ga-Pentixafor PET may have excellent diagnostic performance in the study of several LPDs; (b) [68Ga]Ga-Pentixafor PET may be superior to [18F]FDG or complementary in some LPDs variants and settings; (c) multiple myeloma seems to have a high uptake of [68Ga]Ga-Pentixafor. Overall, this technique is probably suitable for imaging, staging, and follow-up on patients with LPD. Due to limited data, further studies are warranted to confirm the promising role of [68Ga]Ga-Pantixafor in this context.

The cutting edge: Promising oncology radiotracers in clinical development.

Molecular imaging moves forward with the development of new imaging agents, and among these are new radiotracers for nuclear medicine applications, particularly positron emission tomography (PET). A number of new targets are becoming accessible for use in oncologic applications. In this review, major new radiotracers in clinical development are discussed. Prominent among these is the family of fibroblast-activation protein-targeted agents that interact with the tumor microenvironment and may show superiority to 2-deoxy-2-[18F]fluoro-d-glucose in a subset of different tumor histologies. Additionally, carbonic anhydrase IX (CAIX) inhibitors are directed at clear cell renal cell carcinoma, which has long lacked an effective PET imaging agent. Those CAIX agents may also have utility in hypoxic tumors. Pentixafor, which binds to a transmembrane receptor, may similarly allow for visualization by PET of low-grade lymphomas, as well as being a second agent for multiple myeloma that opens theranostic possibilities. There are new adrenergic agents aimed at providing a PET-visible replacement to the single-photon-emitting radiotracer meta-[123I]iodobenzylguanidine (MIBG). Finally, in response to a major development in oncologic chemotherapy, there are new radiotracers targeted at assessing the suitability or use of immunotherapeutic agents. All of these and the existing evidence for their utility are discussed.

Synthesis, Screening, and Evaluation of Theranostic Molecular CPCR4-Based Probe Targeting CXCR4.

Chemokines and chemokine receptors are indispensable to play a key role in the development of malignant tumors. As one of the most widely expressed chemokine receptors, chemokine (C-X-C motif) receptor 4 (CXCR4) has been a popular research focus. In most tumors, CXCR4 expression is significantly upregulated. Moreover, integrated nuclide diagnosis and therapy targeting CXCR4 show great potential. [68Ga]Ga-pentixafor, a radioligand targeting CXCR4, exhibits a strong affinity for CXCR4 both in vivo and in vitro. However, [177Lu]Lu-pentixather, the therapeutic companion of [68Ga]Ga-pentixafor, requires significant refinement to mitigate its pronounced hepatic biodistribution. The objective of this study was to synthesize theranostic molecular tracers with superior CXCR4 targeting functions. The Daudi cell line, which highly expressed CXCR4, and the MM.1S cell line, which weakly expressed CXCR4, were used in this study. Based on the pharmacophore cyclo (-d-Tyr-n-me-d-Orn-l-Arg-L-2-NAL-Gly-) (CPCR4) of pentixafor, six tracers were synthesized: [124I]I-1 ([124I]I-CPCR4), [99mTc]Tc-2 ([99mTc]Tc-HYNIC-CPCR4), [124I]I-3 ([124I]I-pentixafor), [18F]AlF-4 ([18F]AlF-NETA-CPCR4), [99mTc]Tc-5 ([99mTc]Tc-MAG3-CPCR4) and [124I]I-6 ([124I]I-pentixafor-Ga) and their radiochemical purities were all higher than 95%. After positron emission tomography (PET)/single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) imaging, the [124I]I-6 group exhibited the best target-nontarget ratio. At the same time, comparing the [68Ga]Ga-pentixafor group with the [124I]I-6 group, we found that the [124I]I-6 group had a better target-nontarget ratio and lower uptake in nontarget organs. Therefore, compound 6 was selected for therapeutic radionuclide (131I) labeling, and the tumor-bearing animal models were treated with [131I]I-6. The volume of the tumor site was significantly reduced in the treatment group compared with the control group, and no significant side effects were found. [124I]I-6 and [131I]I-6 showed excellent affinity for targeting CXCR4, and they showed great potential for the integrated diagnosis and treatment of tumors with high CXCR4 expression.

Comparison of [18F]FDG and [68 Ga]pentixafor PET/CT in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to explore the feasibility of [68 Ga]pentixafor positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). PROCEDURES: This prospective study included patients with NPC who underwent [68 Ga]pentixafor PET/CT and 2-[18F]fuoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose ([18F]FDG) PET/CT within one week between November 2022 and March 2023. The [68 Ga]pentixafor and [18F]FDG uptakes in primary and metastatic lesions were measured and compared. RESULTS: Twenty-five participants (21 patients for initial stage and four patients for recurrence detection) were enrolled in our study. The participants underwent [18F]FDG PET/CT and [68 Ga]pentixafor PET/CT. [68 Ga]pentixafor PET/CT had the same detection rate as [18F]FDG for primary tumor (96% vs. 96%). The [68 Ga]pentixafor maximum standard uptake value (SUVmax) and target-to-background ratio (TBR) of primary tumors were lower than those of [18F]FDG (SUVmax: 8.13 ± 2.78 vs. 14.25 ± 6.45; P < 0.01; TBR: 5.17 ± 2.14 vs. 9.81 ± 5.30, P < 0.01). The difference between tumor volume of [68 Ga]pentixafor (TVpentixafor) and tumor volume of [18F]FDG (TVFDG) showed no significance (median: 16.01 vs. 9.56, P = 0.332). In the detection of suspected metastatic cervical lymph nodes (CLNs), [68 Ga]pentixafor PET possessed a lower SUVmax than [18F]FDG PET/CT (SUVmax: 6.86 ± 2.63 vs. 10.39 ± 5.28, P < 0.01), but there was no significant difference in the detection rate between [68 Ga]pentixafor and [18F]FDG PET/CT (96 vs. 98, P = 0.613). CONCLUSIONS: [68 Ga]pentixafor is a promising imaging tracer for detecting primary and metastatic NPC. [68 Ga]pentixafor PET/CT is comparable to [18F]FDG PET/CT in the detection rate of primary tumors and metastatic cervical lymph nodes in nasopharyngeal carcinoma, but [68 Ga]pentixafor uptake was heterogeneous. [68 Ga]pentixafor PET/CT may help select patients most likely to benefit from CXCR4-directed endoradiotherapy. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NO: ChiCTR2200065902.

Left Ventricular Remodelling Associated with the Transient Elevated [68Ga]Ga-Pentixafor Activity in the Remote Myocardium Following Acute Myocardial Infarction.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have initially reported accompanying elevated 2-deoxy-2[18F]fluoro-D-glucose ([18F]F-FDG) inflammatory activity in the remote area and its prognostic value after acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Non-invasive characterization of the accompanying inflammation in the remote myocardium may be of potency in guiding future targeted theranostics. [68Ga]Ga-Pentixafor targeting chemokine receptor 4 (CXCR4) on the surface of inflammatory cells is currently one of the promising inflammatory imaging agents. In this study, we sought to focus on the longitudinal evolution of [68Ga]Ga-Pentixafor activities in the remote myocardium following AMI and its association with cardiac function. METHODS: Twelve AMI rats and six Sham rats serially underwent [68Ga]Ga-Pentixafor imaging at pre-operation, and 5, 7, 14 days post-operation. Maximum and mean standard uptake value (SUV) and target-to-background ratio (TBR) were assessed to indicate the uptake intensity. Gated [18F]F-FDG imaging and immunofluorescent staining were performed to obtain cardiac function and responses of pro-inflammatory and reparative macrophages, respectively. RESULTS: The uptake of [68Ga]Ga-Pentixafor in the infarcted myocardium peaked at day 5 (all P = 0.003), retained at day 7 (all P = 0.011), and recovered at day 14 after AMI (P > 0.05), paralleling with the rise-fall pro-inflammatory M1 macrophages (P < 0.05). Correlated with the peak activity in the infarct territory, [68Ga]Ga-Pentixafor uptake in the remote myocardium on day 5 early after AMI significantly increased (AMI vs. Sham: SUVmean, SUVmax, and TBRmean: all P < 0.05), and strongly correlated with contemporaneous EDV and/or ESV (SUVmean and TBRmean: both P < 0.05). The transitory remote activity recovered as of day 7 post-AMI (AMI vs. Sham: P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Corresponding with the peaked [68Ga]Ga-Pentixafor activity in the infarcted myocardium, the activity in the remote region elevated accordingly and led to contemporaneous left ventricular remodelling early after AMI. Further studies are warranted to clarify its clinical application potential.

A comparison of the performance of 68Ga-Pentixafor PET/CT versus adrenal vein sampling for subtype diagnosis in primary aldosteronism.

Objective: To investigate the diagnostic efficiency and prognostic value of 68Ga-Pentixafor PET/CT in comparison with adrenal vein sampling (AVS) for functional lateralization in primary aldosteronism (PA). Histology and long-term clinical follow-up normally serve as the gold standard for such diagnosis. Methods: We prospectively recruited 26 patients diagnosed with PA. All patients underwent 68Ga-Pentixafor PET/CT and AVS. Postsurgical biochemical and clinical outcomes of patients with unilateral primary aldosteronism (UPA), as diagnosed by PET/CT or AVS, were assessed by applying standardized Primary Aldosteronism Surgical Outcome (PASO) criteria. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) was performed to detect the expression of aldosterone synthase (CYP11B2) and CXCR4. Results: On total, 19 patients were diagnosed with UPA; of these, 13 patients were lateralized by both PET/CT and AVS, four patients were lateralized by PET-only, and two by AVS-only. Seven subjects with no lateralization on AVS and PET received medical therapy. All patients achieved complete biochemical success except one with nodular hyperplasia lateralized by AVS alone. The consistency between PET/CT and AVS outcomes was 77% (20/26). Moreover, CYP11B2-positive nodules were all CXCR4-positive and showed positive findings on PET. Patients who achieved complete biochemical and clinical success had a higher uptake on PET as well as stronger expression levels of CXCR4 and CYP11B2. Conclusion: Our analysis showed that 68Ga-Pentixafor PET/CT could enable non-invasive diagnosis in most patients with PA and identify additional cases of unilateral and surgically curable PA which could not be classified by AVS. 68Ga-Pentixafor PET/CT should be considered as a first-line test for the future classification of PA.

68Ga-DOTATATE and 68Ga-Pentixafor PET/CT in a Patient with Castleman Disease of the Retroperitoneum.

This is a case of a 42-year-old man with recurrent symptoms of dizziness and a newly found retroperitoneal mass with no 131I-MIBG uptake who was referred for restaging with 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT and local 68Ga-pentixafor PET/CT. The examinations both showed intense radioactivity uptake in the retroperitoneal mass and no abnormal uptake in the right adrenal nodule. Two lesions showed distinct properties of radioactivity uptake, which suggested the possibility of different sources. A postoperative pathological test revealed that the morphology and immunohistochemistry of the retroperitoneal mass was found to be consistent with Castleman disease, and the right adrenal gland was normal tissue.

[68Ga]Pentixafor PET/CT for staging and prognostic assessment of newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: comparison to [18F]FDG PET/CT.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the prognostic performance of [68Ga]Pentixafor PET/CT at baseline for staging of patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM) and to compare it with [18F]FDG PET/CT and the Revised-International Staging System (R-ISS). METHODS: Patients who underwent [68Ga]Pentixafor and [18F]FDG PET/CT imaging were retrospectively included. Patient staging was performed according to the Durie-Salmon PLUS staging system based on [68Ga]Pentixafor PET/CT and [18F]FDG PET/CT images, and the R-ISS. Progression-free survival (PFS) at patient follow-up was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier estimator and compared using the log-rank test. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was calculated to assess predictive performance. RESULTS: Fifty-five MM patients were evaluated. Compared with [18F]FDG PET, [68Ga]Pentixafor PET detected 25 patients as the same stage, while 26 patients were upstaged and 4 patients were downstaged (P = 0.001). After considering the low-dose CT data, there was no statistically significant difference in the number of patients classified in each stage using [68Ga]Pentixafor PET/CT and [18F]FDG PET/CT (P = 0.091). [68Ga]Pentixafor PET/CT-based staging discriminated PFS outcomes in patients with different disease stages (stage I vs. stage II, stage I vs. stage III, and stage II vs. stage III; all P < 0.05), whereas for [18F]FDG PET/CT, there was only a difference in median PFS between stage I and III (P = 0.021). When staged by R-ISS, the median PFS for stage III was significantly lower than that for stage I and II (P = 0.008 and 0.035, respectively). When predicting 2-year PFS based on staging, the AUC of [68Ga]Pentixafor PET/CT was significantly higher than that of [68Ga]Pentixafor PET (0.923 vs. 0.821, P = 0.002), [18F]FDG PET (0.923 vs. 0.752 P = 0.002), and R-ISS (0.923 vs. 0.776, P = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: [68Ga]Pentixafor PET/CT-based staging possesses substantial potential to predict disease progression in newly diagnosed MM patients.

CXCR4-directed PET/CT with [68 Ga]Ga-pentixafor in solid tumors-a comprehensive analysis of imaging findings and comparison with histopathology.

BACKGROUND: C-X-C motif chemokine receptor 4 (CXCR4) is overexpressed in various solid cancers and can be targeted by CXCR4-directed molecular imaging. We aimed to characterize the in-vivo CXCR4 expression in patients affected with solid tumors, along with a comparison to ex-vivo findings. METHODS: A total 142 patients with 23 different histologically proven solid tumors were imaged with CXCR4-directed PET/CT using [68 Ga]Ga-pentixafor (total number of scans, 152). A semi-quantitative analysis of the CXCR4-positive tumor burden including maximum standardized uptake values (SUVmax) and target-to-background ratios (TBR) using blood pool was conducted. In addition, we performed histopathological staining to determine the immuno-reactive score (IRS) from patients' tumor tissue and investigated possible correlations with SUVmax (by providing Spearman's rho ρ). Based on imaging, we also assessed the eligibility for CXCR4-targeted radioligand therapy or non-radioactive CXCR4 inhibitory treatment (defined as more than five CXCR4-avid target lesions [TL] with SUVmax above 10). RESULTS: One hundred three of 152 (67.8%) scans showed discernible uptake above blood pool (TBR > 1) in 462 lesions (52 primary tumors and 410 metastases). Median TBR was 4.4 (1.05-24.98), thereby indicating high image contrast. The highest SUVmax was observed in ovarian cancer, followed by small cell lung cancer, desmoplastic small round cell tumor, and adrenocortical carcinoma. When comparing radiotracer accumulation between primary tumors and metastases for the entire cohort, comparable SUVmax was recorded (P > 0.999), except for pulmonal findings (P = 0.013), indicative for uniform CXCR4 expression among TL. For higher IRS, a weak, but statistically significant correlation with increased SUVmax was observed (ρ = 0.328; P = 0.018). In 42/103 (40.8%) scans, more than five TL were recorded, with 12/42 (28.6%) exhibiting SUVmax above 10, suggesting eligibility for CXCR4-targeted treatment in this subcohort. CONCLUSIONS: In a whole-body tumor read-out, a substantial portion of prevalent solid tumors demonstrated increased and uniform [68 Ga]Ga-pentixafor uptake, along with high image contrast. We also observed a respective link between in- and ex-vivo CXCR4 expression, suggesting high specificity of the PET agent. Last, a fraction of patients with [68 Ga]Ga-pentixafor-positive tumor burden were rendered potentially suitable for CXCR4-directed therapy.

Chemokine receptor-targeted PET/CT provides superior diagnostic performance in newly diagnosed marginal zone lymphoma patients: a head-to-head comparison with [18F]FDG.

BACKGROUND: In patients with marginal zone lymphoma (MZL), [18F]FDG PET/CT provided inconsistent diagnostic accuracy. C-X-C motif chemokine receptor 4 (CXCR4) is overexpressed in MZL and thus, may emerge as novel theranostic target. We aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of CXCR4-targeting [68Ga]Ga-PentixaFor when compared to [18F]FDG PET/CT in MZL. METHODS: Thirty-two untreated MZL patients (nodal, n = 17; extranodal, n = 13; splenic, n = 2) received [68Ga]Ga-PentixaFor and [18F]FDG PET/CT within median 2 days. We performed a visual and quantitative analysis of the total lymphoma volume by measuring maximum/peak standardized uptake values (SUVmax/peak), and calculating target-to-background ratios (TBR, defined as lesion-based SUVpeak divided by SUVmean from blood pool). Visual comparisons for both radiotracers were carried out for all target lesions (TL), and quantitative analysis of concordant TL evident on both scans. Last, MZL subtype analyses were also conducted. RESULTS: On a patient-based level, [68Ga]Ga-PentixaFor identified MZL manifestations in 32 (100%) subjects (vs. [18F]FDG, 25/32 [78.1%]). Of the 256 identified TL, 127/256 (49.6%) manifestations were evident only on CXCR4-directed imaging, while only 7/256 (2.7%) were identified on [18F]FDG but missed by [68Ga]Ga-PentixaFor. In the remaining 122/256 (47.7%) concordant TL, [68Ga]Ga-PentixaFor consistently provided increased metrics when compared to [18F]FDG: SUVmax, 10.3 (range, 2.53-37.2) vs. 5.72 (2.32-37.0); SUVpeak, 6.23 (1.58-25.7) vs. 3.87 (1.54-27.7); P < 0.01, respectively. Concordant TL TBR on [68Ga]Ga-PentixaFor (median, 3.85; range, 1.05-16.0) was also approximately 1.8-fold higher relative to [18F]FDG (median, 2.08; range, 0.81-28.8; P < 0.01). Those findings on image contrast, however, were driven by nodal MZL (P < 0.01), and just missed significance for extranodal MZL (P = 0.06). CONCLUSIONS: In newly diagnosed MZL patients, [68Ga]Ga-PentixaFor identified more sites of disease when compared to [18F]FDG, irrespective of MZL subtype. Quantitative PET parameters including TBR were also higher on [68Ga]Ga-PentixaFor PET/CT, suggesting improved diagnostic read-out using chemokine receptor-targeted imaging.