Cardiovascular Pharmacogenetics: From Discovery of Genetic Association to Clinical Adoption of Derived Test.

Recent breakthroughs in human genetics and in information technologies have markedly expanded our understanding at the molecular level of the response to drugs, i.e. pharmacogenetics (PGx), across therapy areas. This review is restricted to PGx for cardiovascular (CV) drugs. First, we examined the PGx information in the labels approved by regulatory agencies in Europe, Japan and North America, and related recommendations from expert panels. Out of 221 marketed CV drugs, 36 had PGx information in their labels approved by one or more agencies. The level of annotations and recommendations varied markedly between agencies and expert panels. Clopidogrel is the only CV drug with consistent PGx recommendation (i.e., "actionable"). This situation prompted us to dissect the steps from discovery of a PGx association to clinical translation. We found 101 genome-wide association studies which investigated the response to CV drugs or drug classes. These studies reported significant associations for 48 PGx traits mapping to 306 genes. Six of these 306 genes are mentioned in the corresponding PGx labels or recommendations for CV drugs. Genomic analyses also highlighted the wide between-population differences in risk allele frequencies, and the individual load of actionable PGx variants. Given high attrition rate and the long road to clinical translation, additional work is warranted to identify and validate PGx variants for more CV drugs across diverse populations and to demonstrate the utility of PGx testing. To that end, pre-emptive PGx combining genomic profiling with electronic medical records opens unprecedented opportunities to improve healthcare, for CV disease and beyond. Significance Statement Despite spectacular breakthroughs in human molecular genetics and information technologies, consistent evidence supporting pharmacogenetic (PGx) testing in the cardiovascular area is limited to few drugs. Additional work is warranted to discover and validate new PGx markers and demonstrate their utility. Pre-emptive PGx combining genomic profiling with electronic medical records opens unprecedented opportunities to improve healthcare, for cardiovascular disease and beyond.

MIR27A Gene Polymorphism Modifies the Effect of Common DPYD Gene Variants on Severe Toxicity in Patients with Gastrointestinal Tumors Treated with Fluoropyrimidine-Based Anticancer Therapy.

To reduce severe fluoropyrimidine-related toxicity, pharmacogenetic guidelines recommend a dose reduction for carriers of four high-risk variants in the DPYD gene (*2A, *13, c.2846A>T, HapB3). The polymorphism in the MIR27A gene has been shown to enhance the predictive value of these variants. Our study aimed to explore whether rs895819 in the MIR27A gene modifies the effect of five common DPYD variants: c.1129-5923C>G (rs75017182, HapB3), c.2194G>A (rs1801160, *6), c.1601G>A (rs1801158, *4), c.496A>G (rs2297595), and c.85T>C (rs1801265, *9A). The study included 370 Caucasian patients with gastrointestinal tumors who received fluoropyrimidine-containing chemotherapy. Genotyping was performed using high-resolution melting analysis. The DPYD*6 allele was associated with overall severe toxicity and neutropenia with an increased risk particularly pronounced in patients carrying the MIR27A variant. All carriers of DPYD*6 exhibited an association with asthenia regardless of their MIR27A status. The increased risk of neutropenia in patients with c.496G was only evident in those co-carrying the MIR27A variant. DPYD*4 was also significantly linked to neutropenia risk in co-carriers of the MIR27A variant. Thus, we have demonstrated the predictive value of the *6, *4, and c.496G alleles of the DPYD gene, considering the modifying effect of the MIR27A polymorphism.

Exploring the contribution of genetic variants to high sunitinib exposure in patients with cancer.

AIMS: Sunitinib exhibits considerable interindividual variability in exposure. While the target total plasma concentration of sunitinib and its active metabolite is 50-87.5 ng/mL for the intermittent dosing schedule, ~10-21% of patients experience higher exposures (>87.5 ng/mL), correlated with an increased risk for toxicity. Previous research identified single nucleotide variants (SNVs) in genes from the sunitinib pharmacokinetic pathway to be associated with efficacy and toxicity. However, significant interindividual variability in exposure remains unexplained. Our aim was to identify genetic variants associated with supratherapeutic exposure of sunitinib. METHODS: This was a genome-wide association study. Cases were identified during routine therapeutic drug monitoring and consisted of patients with dose-normalized sunitinib plasma concentrations >87.5 ng/mL (intermittent dosing) or >75 ng/mL (continuous dosing). Controls were sampled from the historical cohort EuroTARGET who tolerated the standard dose of 50 mg in an intermittent schedule. SNVs were tested for an association with sunitinib exposure. A P-value ≤5 × 10-8 was considered significant and a P-value between 5 × 10-8 and 5 × 10-6 was considered suggestive. RESULTS: Sixty-nine cases and 345 controls were included for association analysis. One SNV (rs6923761), located on the gene glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor, was significantly associated with increased sunitinib exposure (P = 7.86 × 10-19). Twelve SNVs were suggestive for an association with sunitinib exposure (P ≤ 5 × 10-6). CONCLUSIONS: While rs6923671 is associated with high sunitinib exposure, the underlying mechanism is not yet clarified and warrants further investigation. We could not confirm the earlier found associations between SNVs in candidate genes involved in the pharmacokinetic pathway of sunitinib and its efficacy and toxicity.

Opioids and personalized analgesia in the perioperative setting: A protocol for five systematic reviews.

BACKGROUND: Treatment with opioids is a mainstay in perioperative pain management. While the leading treatment paradigm has been procedure-specific pain management, efforts regarding personalized pain treatment are increasing. The OPI•AID project aims to develop personalized algorithms for perioperative pain management, taking demographic, surgical, and anaesthesiologic factors into account. We will undertake five parallel reviews to illuminate current evidence on different aspects of individual responses to perioperative opioid treatment. METHODS: Inclusion of adult populations in English-written studies. Review-specific searches are developed for the following databases: CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, clinicaltrials.gov, and clinicaltrial.eu. Two authors will independently screen citations, extract data, and assess the risks of bias in each review (QUIPS, PROBAST and RoB2, as relevant). CONCLUSION: These reviews will evaluate various aspects of perioperative opioid treatment, including individualized treatment strategies, selection of specific opioids, and individual patient responses. These will guide future development of a personalized perioperative opioid treatment algorithm (OPI•AID) that will be validated and tested clinically against standard of care.

Application of pharmacogenetic/pharmacogenomic data to personalize treatment in routine clinical practice. A narrative review. / Aplicación de datos farmacogenéticos/farmacogenómicos para personalizar el tratamiento en la práctica clínica habitual. Revisión narrativa.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this article is to perform a narrative review of how pharmacogenetics and pharmacogenomics is being applied in the clinic, especially in Spain. METHOD: Publications and websites of major interest have been reviewed. RESULTS: Pharmacogenes and variants used in several hospitals, available methodologies, and the implementation process are discussed.

[Translated article] Application of pharmacogenetic/pharmacogenomic data to personalise treatment in routine clinical practice. A narrative review.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this article was to perform a narrative review of how pharmacogenetics and pharmacogenomics is being applied in the clinics, especially in Spain. METHOD: Publications and websites of major interest have been reviewed. RESULTS: Pharmacogenes and variants used in several hospitals, available methodologies, and the implementation process are discussed.

Pharmacogenetic educational needs and the role of pharmacogenetics in primary care: a focus group study with multiple perspectives.

Background: Pharmacogenomics (PGx) is a well-established concept of how genes impact medication response, with many studies demonstrating reductions in medication side effects, improved efficacy and cost effectiveness. Despite these benefits, implementation of PGx in daily practice remains limited. Studies on the implementation of PGx in clinical practice have previously found that inadequate knowledge is one of the main barriers. Details regarding specifically which educational needs exist among family medicine clinicians requires further study. Objective: The aim of this study was to identify both the perceived role that pharmacogenomics (PGx) could play in primary care practice, the knowledge gaps that family medicine clinicians experience, and the skills they require to use PGx in their daily practice. Methods: To achieve this aim, the attitudes, knowledge, barriers, skills needed, and preferred educational program were explored in a family medicine clinician focus group study via a semi-structured interview and knowledge quiz. Second, multidisciplinary focus groups provided information on the level of knowledge and necessary skills to use PGx in patient care. After gathering key recorded information from both focus groups, the perceived role pharmacogenomics could possibly play in primary care, the predominant knowledge gaps, and the most appropriate educational program was determined by qualitative analysis. Results: Four themes emerged regarding the PGx educational needs and the role of PGx in family medicine: 1) need for PGx competences, 2) insight into the roles and responsibilities of PGx services, 3) optimization of PGx workflow through artificial intelligence integrated in the electronic health record, and 4) the ethical dilemmas and psychological effects related to PGx. These themes reflect a shift in the role of PGx in family medicine with implications for education. Conclusion: The results obtained from this study will help improve the implementation of PGx in daily practice, and consequently, may result in increased utilization of PGx, thereby resulting in improved medication efficacy and reduced side effects.

Potential association of SULT2A1 and ABCG2 variant alleles with increased risk for palbociclib toxicity.

Aim: This study evaluated associations between CYP3A4*22 and variants in other pharmacogenes (CYP3A5, SULT2A1, ABCB1, ABCG2, ERCC1) and the risk for palbociclib-associated toxicities. Materials & methods: Two hundred cancer patients who received standard-of-care palbociclib were genotyped and associations with toxicity were evaluated retrospectively. Results: No significant associations were found for CYP3A4*22, CYP3A5*3, ABCB1_rs1045642, ABCG2_rs2231142, ERCC1_rs3212986 and ERCC1_rs11615. Homozygous variant carriers of SULT2A1_rs182420 had higher incidence of dose modifications due to palbociclib toxicity (odds ratio [OR]: 4.334, 95% CI: 1.057-17.767, p = 0.042). ABCG2_rs2231137 variant carriers had borderline higher incidence of grade 3-4 neutropenia (OR: 4.14, 95% CI: 0.99-17.37, p = 0.052). Conclusion: Once validated, SULT2A1 and ABCG2 variants may be useful to individualize palbociclib dosing to minimize toxicities and improve treatment outcomes.

[Box: see text].

Update on the PriME-PGx initiative: evolution of pharmacogenetics in daily clinical practice.

In 2021, the Clinical Pharmacology Department of Hospital Universitario de La Princesa launched the PriME-PGx initiative (Multidisciplinary Initiative of the Hospital Universitario de La Princesa for the Implementation of Pharmacogenetics) to promote the expansion of pharmacogenetics in hospitalized patients. We establish seven pharmacogenetic profiles based on the specific needs of seven departments: Oncology, Pain Unit, Neuropsychiatry, Internal or Infectious Medicine, Cardiology, Gastroenterology and Immunosuppressants. The experience of the last 3 years reflects a total of 1421 reports (37.4% being oncology profiles), with a gradual increase in the number of requests each year. With this project, we aim to expand the availability and utility of pharmacogenetic biomarkers to achieve personalised therapy that avoids adverse drug reactions and therapeutic failure.

[Box: see text].

Overcoming Barriers: Strategies for Implementing Pharmacist-Led Pharmacogenetic Services in Swiss Clinical Practice.

There is growing evidence that pharmacogenetic analysis can improve drug therapy for individual patients. In Switzerland, pharmacists are legally authorized to initiate pharmacogenetic tests. However, pharmacogenetic tests are rarely conducted in Swiss pharmacies. Therefore, we aimed to identify implementation strategies that facilitate the integration of a pharmacist-led pharmacogenetic service into clinical practice. To achieve this, we conducted semi-structured interviews with pharmacists and physicians regarding the implementation process of a pharmacist-led pharmacogenetic service. We utilized the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) to identify potential facilitators and barriers in the implementation process. Additionally, we employed Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) to identify strategies mentioned in the interviews and used the CFIR-ERIC matching tool to identify additional strategies. We obtained interview responses from nine pharmacists and nine physicians. From these responses, we identified 7 CFIR constructs as facilitators and 12 as barriers. Some of the most commonly mentioned barriers included unclear procedures, lack of cost coverage by health care insurance, insufficient pharmacogenetics knowledge, lack of interprofessional collaboration, communication with the patient, and inadequate e-health technologies. Additionally, we identified 23 implementation strategies mentioned by interviewees using ERIC and 45 potential strategies using the CFIR-ERIC matching tool. In summary, we found that significant barriers hinder the implementation process of this new service. We hope that by highlighting potential implementation strategies, we can advance the integration of a pharmacist-led pharmacogenetic service in Switzerland.

A Comprehensive Review: Pharmacogenomics and Personalized Medicine Customizing Drug Therapy Based on Individual Genetics Profiles.

Numerous factors, such as genetics, environmental factors, and illness determinants, might contribute to an unpleasant pharmaceutical response. In an effort to increase efficacy and safety, as well as to gain a better understanding of drug disposition and clinical consequences, researchers in the two quickly emerging fields of pharmacogenetics (which focuses on single genes) and pharmacogenomics (which focuses on many genes) have studied the genetic personalization of drug response. This is due to the fact that a large number of pharmacological responses seem to be genetically based, and the relationship between medication response and genotype may be important for diagnosis. We now have a better understanding of the genetic basis of individual medication responses because to research on pharmaceuticals and genes. Pharmacogenomics aims to improve patient outcomes by developing personalized medicine by using the diversity of the human genome and how it affects medication response. Translational in nature, pharmacogenomics research encompasses everything from the discovery of genotype-phenotype associations to clinical investigations that might show therapeutic relevance. Though the conversion of pharmacogenomics research findings into clinical practice has been sluggish, advances in the field offer considerable potential for future therapeutic applications in specific people.

Strategies for DPYD testing prior to fluoropyrimidine chemotherapy in the US.

PURPOSE: Patients with dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) deficiency are at high risk for severe and fatal toxicity from fluoropyrimidine (FP) chemotherapy. Pre-treatment DPYD testing is standard of care in many countries, but not the United States (US). This survey assessed pre-treatment DPYD testing approaches in the US to identify best practices for broader adoption. METHODS: From August to October 2023, a 22-item QualtricsXM survey was sent to institutions and clinicians known to conduct pre-treatment DPYD testing and broadly distributed through relevant organizations and social networks. Responses were analyzed using descriptive analysis. RESULTS: Responses from 24 unique US sites that have implemented pre-treatment DPYD testing or have a detailed implementation plan in place were analyzed. Only 33% of sites ordered DPYD testing for all FP-treated patients; at the remaining sites, patients were tested depending on disease characteristics or clinician preference. Almost 50% of sites depend on individual clinicians to remember to order testing without the assistance of electronic alerts or workflow reminders. DPYD testing was most often conducted by commercial laboratories that tested for at least the four or five DPYD variants considered clinically actionable. Approximately 90% of sites reported receiving results within 10 days of ordering. CONCLUSION: Implementing DPYD testing into routine clinical practice is feasible and requires a coordinated effort among the healthcare team. These results will be used to develop best practices for the clinical adoption of DPYD testing to prevent severe and fatal toxicity in cancer patients receiving FP chemotherapy.

How can we better address the pharmacokinetics of antipsychotics in children and adolescents?

INTRODUCTION: Despite a steady increase of antipsychotic prescriptions in children and adolescents, knowledge about pharmacokinetics and dosing of antipsychotics in children and adolescents remains limited. AREAS COVERED: We discuss seven issues with major impact on the pharmacokinetics of antipsychotics in youth: estrogens, ii) obesity, iii) ethnicity, iv) smoking, v) inflammation, vi) drug-drug interactions (DDIs), and vii) pharmacogenetics. Despite their major impact, these issues have not been adequately considered in the context of dosing algorithms for antipsychotics in youth. A simple tool to quantify the impact of these pharmacokinetics issues on antipsychotics is therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM), which refers to the quantification of the prescribed medication in the blood of the patients, as a surrogate for the peripheral antipsychotic exposure. We also provide summary tables extrapolated from the adult literature on metabolism, therapeutic reference ranges (TRRs) and DDIs. EXPERT OPINION: Despite considerable experience with TDM for antipsychotics in the management of other patient subgroups, TDM use for antipsychotics in children and adolescents may be limited with TRRs invariably being extrapolated from adult patients. Advancing TDM knowledge is expected to help clinicians address the special properties of pharmacokinetics of antipsychotics and ultimately enable antipsychotic dose individualization in youth.

Pharmacogenetics in Italy: current landscape and future prospects.

Pharmacogenetics investigates sequence of genes that affect drug response, enabling personalized medication. This approach reduces drug-induced adverse reactions and improves clinical effectiveness, making it a crucial consideration for personalized medical care. Numerous guidelines, drawn by global consortia and scientific organizations, codify genotype-driven administration for over 120 active substances. As the scientific community acknowledges the benefits of genotype-tailored therapy over traditionally agnostic drug administration, the push for its implementation into Italian healthcare system is gaining momentum. This evolution is influenced by several factors, including the improved access to patient genotypes, the sequencing costs decrease, the growing of large-scale genetic studies, the rising popularity of direct-to-consumer pharmacogenetic tests, and the continuous improvement of pharmacogenetic guidelines. Since EMA (European Medicines Agency) and AIFA (Italian Medicines Agency) provide genotype information on drug leaflet without clear and explicit clinical indications for gene testing, the regulation of pharmacogenetic testing is a pressing matter in Italy. In this manuscript, we have reviewed how to overcome the obstacles in implementing pharmacogenetic testing in the clinical practice of the Italian healthcare system. Our particular emphasis has been on germline testing, given the absence of well-defined national directives in contrast to somatic pharmacogenetics.

The Frequencies distribution of CYP3A5 rs776746 and ABCB1 rs1045642 polymorphisms in the west Algerian population and relationships with pharmacogenetics.

Introduction: Pharmacogenetic markers, such as the ATP Binding Cassette (ABCB1) and cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A5 enzymes, play a crucial role in personalized medicine by influencing drug efficacy and toxicity based on individuals' or populations' genetic variations.This study aims to investigate the genetic polymorphisms of CYP3A5 (rs776746) and ABCB1 (rs1045642) in the West Algerian population and compare the genotypes and allelic distributions with those of various ethnic groups. Methods: The study involved 472 unrelated healthy subjects from the Western Algerian population. DNA genotyping was performed using TaqMan allelic discrimination assay. The variants in our population were compared to those in other ethnic groups available in the 1000 Genomes Project. Genotype and allele frequencies were calculated using the chi-square test and the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (HWE). Results: The minor allele frequencies were found to be 0.21 for CYP3A5 6986A and 0.34 for ABCB1 3435T. These frequencies were similar to those observed in North African populations, while notable differences were observed in comparison to certain Caucasian and African populations. Conclusion: The difference in the allelic and genotypic distribution of these polymorphisms emphasize the need for dose adjustments in drugs metabolized by CYP3A5 and transported by ABCB1 to optimize treatments outcomes.

ADRB2 and ADCY9 Sequence Variations in Brazilian Asthmatic Patients.

Asthma is a chronic inflammatory respiratory condition, characterized by variable airflow limitation, leading to clinical symptoms such as dyspnea and chest tightness. These symptoms result from an underlying inflammatory process. The ß2 agonists are bronchodilators prescribed for the relief of the disease. Nevertheless, their efficacy exhibits substantial interindividual variability. Currently, there is widespread recognition of the association between specific genetic variants, predominantly located within the ADRB2 and ADCY9 genes and their efficacy. This association, usually represented by the presence of non-synonymous single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) have a strong impact in the protein functionality. The prevalence of these mutations varies based on the ethnic composition of the population and thus understanding the profiles of variability in different populations would contribute significantly to standardizing the use of these medications. In this study, we conducted a sequence-based genotyping of the relevant SNPs within the ADRB2 and ADCY9 genes in patients undergoing treatment with bronchodilators and/or corticosteroids at two healthcare facilities in the state of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. We investigated the presence of c.46A>G, c.79C>G, c.252G>A, and c.491C>T SNPs within the ADRB2, and c.1320018 A>G within the ADCY9. Our results were in line with existing literature data with both for individuals in Brazil and Latin American.

Epigenetic and sex differences in opioid use disorder in chronic pain: A real-world study linked with OPRM1 DNA methylation.

Opioid use disorder (OUD) is a multifaceted condition influenced by sex, genetic and environmental factors that could be linked with epigenetic changes. Understanding how these factors interact is crucial to understand and address the development and progression of this disorder. Our aim was to elucidate different potential epigenetic and genetic mechanisms between women and men that correlate with OUD under real-world pain unit conditions. Associations between analgesic response and the DNA methylation level of the opioid mu receptor (OPRM1) gene (CpG sites 1-5 selected in the promoter region) were evaluated in 345 long opioid-treated chronic non cancer pain: cases with OUD (n = 67) and controls (without OUD, n = 278). Cases showed younger ages, low employment status and quality of life, but higher morphine equivalent daily dose and psychotropic use, compared to the controls. The patients with OUD showed a significant decrease in OPRM1 DNA methylation, which correlated with clinical outcomes like pain relief, depression and different adverse events. Significant differences were found at the five CpG sites studied for men, and exclusively in women for CpG site 3, in relation to OUD diagnosis. These findings support the importance of epigenetics and sex as biological variables to be considered toward efficient OUD understanding and therapy development.

Pharmacogenetics of therapies in rheumatoid arthritis: An update.

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a systemic autoimmune inflammatory arthritis. Despite many treatment advances, achieving remission or low-disease activity in RA remains challenging, often requiring trial and error approaches with numerous medications. Precision medicine, particularly pharmacogenomics, explores how genetic factors influence drug response in individual patients, and incorporates such factors to develop personalized treatments for individual patients. Genetic variations in drug-metabolizing enzymes, transporters, and targets may contribute to inter-individual differences in drug efficacy and toxicity. Advancements in molecular sequencing have allowed rapid identification of such variants, including single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). This review highlights recent major findings in the pharmacogenetics of therapies in RA, focusing on key genes and SNPs to provide insights into current trends and developments in this field.