The Predictive Risk Factor of Postoperative Recurrence Following Altemeier's and Delorme's Procedures for Full-thickness Rectal Prolapse: An Analysis of 127 Japanese Patients in a Single Institution.

Objectives: We aimed to identify risk factors for postoperative recurrence (PR) after Altemeier's and Delorme's procedures for full-thickness rectal prolapse (FTRP). Methods: We enrolled 127 patients who underwent Altemeier's and Delorme's procedures for FTRP between April 2008 and September 2021. We divided the 127 patients into recurrence and non-recurrence groups and conducted univariate and multivariate analyses. We used six independent variables: age, body mass index (BMI), history of surgical repair for FTRP, coexistence of prolapse in other organs, poor fixation of the rectum on defecography before surgery, length of the prolapsed rectum, and type of surgical procedure (Altemeier's or Delorme's procedures). Results: PR developed in 51 (40.1%) patients during a mean follow-up period of 453 (range, 9-3616) days. Comparing the recurrence group (n=51) with the non-recurrence group (n=76), significant difference was observed regarding the coexistence of prolapse in other organs (p=0.017) in the univariate analysis. In the multivariate analysis, significant differences were observed in BMI (OR 1.18, 95% CI 1.030-1.350, p=0.020), coexistence of prolapse in other organs (OR 3.38, 95% CI 1.200-9.500, p=0.021), length of the prolapsed rectum (OR 1.030, 95% CI 1.010-1.060, p=0.015), poor fixity of the rectum on defecography (OR 0.332, 95% CI 0.129-0.852, p=0.022), and surgical procedures (OR 0.192, 95% CI 0.064-0.573, p=0.003). Conclusions: The study suggested that increasing BMI, coexistence of prolapse in other organs, length of the prolapsed rectum, poor fixation of the rectum on defecography before surgery, and types of surgical procedure might be risk factors of PR after perineal surgery for FTRP.

Rectal prolapse in the pediatric population-a narrative review of medical and surgical management.

Background and Objective: Although more frequent in the adult population, rectal prolapse is a common anorectal condition that can occur in children and adolescents. While many cases spontaneously resolve without the need for intervention, the advent of newer minimally invasive procedures and operations have provided options for pediatric patients. Here, we review the pathophysiology, etiology, presentation, diagnosis and principles of management of rectal prolapse in the pediatric population as it has evolved over the past several decades. Methods: The literature was queried from free databases available to the public including the National Institute of Health National Library of Medicine MEDLINE and PubMed for manuscripts published from January 1, 1975 to December 1, 2023. Manuscripts without an accompanying English translation or those written entirely in foreign languages were excluded. Key Content and Findings: Numerous conditions contribute to rectal prolapse in children, including constipation, gastrointestinal infectious and non-infectious etiologies, cystic fibrosis, malnutrition, neurogenic, anatomic, lead points, and abuse. Initial management of rectal prolapse is medical management, addressing the underlying condition associated with rectal prolapse along with attempted manual reduction. For patients with recurrent rectal prolapse, a variety of noninvasive and procedural management options are available including injection sclerotherapy and anal encirclement in addition to surgical rectopexy by open and newer minimally invasive methods. Conclusions: Despite significant advances in the evaluation, procedural and surgical management of pediatric anorectal conditions in the last few decades, there continues to be substantial variation in clinicians' and surgeons' practice for the treatment of rectal prolapse in children and adolescents. Much remains to be studied in the future to improve clinical outcomes for this patient population.

Methylene Blue, a Unique Topical Analgesic: A Case Report.

Background: Rectal prolapse is a circumferential, full-thickness protrusion of the rectum through the anus, which, if not properly managed, may become incarcerated and pose a risk of strangulation. This pathology is rarely a medical emergency unless a complication is encountered. Such complications include infection, necrosis, perforation, incarceration, and uncontrolled pain. Case Presentation: We report a case of an elderly patient with pain associated with chronic rectal prolapse. Surgical intervention had been ruled out, and there had been no pain relief after using systemic analgesics. Case Management: Based on increasing reports of analgesic properties, topical methylene blue (MB) 0.1% was applied externally at the prolapsed organ, obtaining pain relief. Case Outcome: The patient experienced immediate and long-lasting pain relief; MB applications were continued every 12 hours as needed. After this therapy, the patient was no longer in need of systemic analgesics. No side effects were reported. Conclusion: Topical MB may be an effective analgesic for the management of pain associated with chronic rectal prolapse. This treatment might be extrapolated to other clinical scenarios of tegumentary pain. Similar use has been shown to be safe and effective in other pathologies, including pain in oral mucositis associated with cancer therapy.

Outcomes of Laparoscopic Suture Rectopexy Versus Laparoscopic Mesh Rectopexy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

The contemporary literature provides conflicting evidence regarding the precedence of laparoscopic mesh rectopexy over laparoscopic suture rectopexy for full-thickness rectal prolapse. This study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of mesh and suture rectopexy to improve the surgical management of complete rectal prolapse. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were followed to extract studies based on mesh versus suture rectopexy and published from 2001 to 2023. The articles of interest were obtained from PubMed Central, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Journal Storage (JSTOR), Web of Science, Embase, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library. The primary outcomes included rectal prolapse recurrence, constipation improvement, and operative time. The secondary endpoints included the Cleveland Clinic Constipation Score, Cleveland Clinic Incontinence Score, intraoperative bleeding, hospital stay duration, mortality, overall postoperative complications, and surgical site infection. A statistically significant low recurrence of rectal prolapse (odds ratio: 0.41, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.21-0.80; p=0.009) and longer mean operative duration (mean difference: 27.05, 95% CI 18.86-35.24; p<0.00001) were observed in patients with mesh rectopexy versus suture rectopexy. Both study groups, however, had no significant differences in constipation improvement and all secondary endpoints (all p>0.05). The laparoscopic mesh rectopexy was associated with a low postoperative rectal prolapse recurrence and a longer operative duration compared to laparoscopic suture rectopexy. Prospective randomized controlled trials should further evaluate mesh and suture rectopexy approaches for postoperative outcomes to inform the surgical management of complete rectal prolapse.

Hemorrhoidal laser ablation procedure: a minimally invasive treatment for grades II, III, and IV using a 1470 nm diode laser.

<b>Indroduction:</b> Hemorrhoids often cause pain, and achieving painless outcomes through surgery is challenging. Hemorrhoidal Laser Ablation, a method for treating severe hemorrhoids, has limited documentation in clinical trials.</br> <br><b>Aim:</b> This retrospective study aimed to present our experience with Hemorrhoidal Laser Ablation in symptomatic grade II, III, and IV internal hemorrhoids and evaluate the efficacy and safety of this relatively recent technique.</br> <br><b>Material and methods:</b> The cohort included 138 patients with symptomatic hemorrhoids who underwent Hemorrhoidal Laser Ablation at three different medical centers in 2017-2022. Patients were treated with a 1470 nm diode laser. Data were collected on clinical and perioperative characteristics and outcomes.</br> <br><b>Results:</b> No evidence of intraoperative complications occurred. There was no rectal tenesmus or alteration of defecation habits. Early mild postoperative symptoms were observed for an average of one week after the operation. The plateau of symptom resolution and downgrading of hemorrhoid size reached approximately six months post-procedure. The short- -term recurrence rate was 0.8% within roughly a month after the laser surgery, while the long-term recurrence rate was 5% over up to five years of follow-up. The overall satisfaction rate was 95% with symptomatic relief.</br> <br><b>Conclusions:</b> Hemorrhoidal Laser Ablation is a painless outpatient technique that does not require general anesthesia. It is an easy-to-perform, convenient, safe, and efficient modality in reducing symptoms and complications of grades II, III, and IV internal hemorrhoids. Hemorrhoidal Laser Ablation limits postoperative discomfort and allows the patient to return to daily routines quickly.</br>.

Efficacy of surgical treatments for the management of solitary rectal ulcer syndrome: a network meta-analysis.

AIM: Solitary rectal ulcer syndrome (SRUS) is a benign and poorly understood disorder with complex management. Typical symptoms include straining during defaecation, rectal bleeding, tenesmus, mucoid secretion, anal pain and a sense of incomplete evacuation. Diagnosis is based on characteristic clinical symptoms and endoscopic/histological findings. Several treatments have been reported in the literature with variable ulcer healing rates. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of different treatments for SRUS. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic review and network meta-analysis were performed according to the PRISMA guidelines. Studies in English, French and Spanish languages were included. Papers written in other languages were excluded. Other exclusion criteria were reviews, case reports or clinical series enrolling less than five patients, study duplications, no clinical data of interest and no article available. A systematic literature search was conducted from January 2000 to March 2024 using the following databases: PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and Scopus. The biases of the studies were assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale or the Jadad scale when appropriate. Types of treatment and their efficacy for the cure of SRUS were collected and critically assessed. The study's primary outcome was to estimate the rate of patients with ulcer healing. RESULTS: A total of 22 studies with 911 patients (men 361, women 550) diagnosed with SRUS were analysed in the final meta-analysis. The pooled effect estimates of treatment efficacy revealed that surgery showed the highest ulcer healing rate (70.5%; 95% CI 0.57-0.83). Surgery was superior in the cure of ulcers with respect to medical therapies and biofeedback (OR 0.09 and OR 0.14). CONCLUSION: Solitary rectal ulcer syndrome is a challenging clinical entity to manage. Proficient results have been reported with the surgical approach, suggesting its positive role in cases refractory to medical and biofeedback therapy. Further studies in homogeneous populations are required to evaluate the efficacy of surgery in this setting. (PROSPERO registration number CRD42022331422).

Analysis of factors that indicated surgery in 400 patients submitted to a complete diagnostic workup for obstructed defecation syndrome and rectal prolapse using a supervised machine learning algorithm.

BACKGROUND: Patient selection is extremely important in obstructed defecation syndrome (ODS) and rectal prolapse (RP) surgery. This study assessed factors that guided the indications for ODS and RP surgery and their specific role in our decision-making process using a machine learning approach. METHODS: This is a retrospective analysis of a long-term prospective observational study on female patients reporting symptoms of ODS who underwent a complete diagnostic workup from January 2010 to December 2021 at an academic tertiary referral center. Clinical, defecographic, and other functional tests data were assessed. A supervised machine learning algorithm using a classification tree model was performed and tested. RESULTS: A total of 400 patients were included. The factors associated with a significantly higher probability of undergoing surgery were follows: as symptoms, perineal splinting, anal or vaginal self-digitations, sensation of external RP, episodes of fecal incontinence and soiling; as physical examination features, evidence of internal and external RP, rectocele, enterocele, or anterior/middle pelvic organs prolapse; as defecographic findings, intra-anal and external RP, rectocele, incomplete rectocele emptying, enterocele, cystocele, and colpo-hysterocele. Surgery was less indicated in patients with dyssynergia, severe anxiety and depression. All these factors were included in a supervised machine learning algorithm. The model showed high accuracy on the test dataset (79%, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Symptoms assessment and physical examination proved to be fundamental, but other functional tests should also be considered. By adopting a machine learning model in further ODS and RP centers, indications for surgery could be more easily and reliably identified and shared.

Two Rings, Two Recoveries: Exploring the Thiersch Method in Complicated Cases.

Rectal prolapse, characterized by the protrusion of rectal mucosa or full-thickness tissue through the anal canal, significantly impacts quality of life, necessitating prompt intervention upon diagnosis. This case report presents the management of rectal prolapse in two cases admitted to our institution presenting with complaints of a prolapsing anal mass and many associated comorbidities and their subsequent surgical management using the Thiersch procedure. Following the procedure, both patients were monitored postoperatively, discharged once vitally stable, and kept on regular follow-up. Surgery is the primary therapy for rectal prolapse, and while various surgical techniques address rectal prolapse, anal encirclement procedures like the Thiersch procedure have been largely replaced by newer abdominal or perineal approaches. However, it is a valuable option for select patient populations. The Thiersch procedure is an ideal modality for treating high-risk patients with rectal prolapse or those patients with poor compliance for more extensive procedures. It can also be used temporarily until a further definitive treatment is planned later in the future.

Prescription Data Mining and Network Pharmacology Study of 1152 Patients with Rectal Prolapse Using Traditional Chinese Medicine.

BACKGROUND: In recent years, the incidence of rectal prolapse has increased significantly due to the sedentary lifestyle and irregular eating habits of modern life. However, there is a lack of clinical studies on the treatment of rectal prolapse with traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) with a large sample size. Therefore, this study investigated the characteristics of rectal prolapse treatment formulas and then studied the network pharmacology of their core therapeutic drugs, which can help to provide a reference for the treatment and postoperative care of rectal prolapse patients. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to explore the prescription characteristics and the mechanism of action of core drugs in the treatment of rectal prolapse in Chinese medicine through data mining and bioinformatics techniques. METHODS: We collected the diagnosis and treatment information of patients with rectal prolapse from January 2014 to September 2021 in the electronic case database of Nanjing Hospital of TCM, mined the patient information and prescription features using R, screened the active ingredients of the core pairs of drugs and disease drug intersection targets using TCMSP and GnenCard databases, and constructed a Protein-protein interaction (PPI) network using STRING and Cytoscape, and Gene Ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) enrichment analyses of the intersecting targets were performed using Metascape and R. RESULTS: We found that prolapse is easy to occur in people over 50 years old, preferably in autumn and winter. Commonly used therapeutic Chinese medicines include Glycyrrhiza glabra, Radix angelicae sinensis, Radix astragali, Atractylodes macrocephala, and Pericarpium citri reticulatae, which are mostly deficiency tonic medicines, warm in nature, and belong to spleen meridian. The core therapeutic medicinal pair was "Bupleuri radix-Cimicifugae rhizoma". There were 190 common targets of Bupleuri radix and Cimicifugae rhizoma, and 71 intersection targets of the drug pair and prolapse. The main components of the core drugs for the treatment of prolapse may be quercetin, kaempferol, Stigmasterol, etc, and the core targets may be CASP3, AKT1, HIF1A, etc. The total number of GO entries for the intersection targets of "Bupleuri radix-Cimicifugae rhizoma" and diseases was 3495, among which the molecular functions accounted for the largest proportion, mainly Pathways in cancer, IL-18 signaling pathway, etc. KEGG enriched pathway analysis yielded 168 results, and the major pathways were pathways in cancer, lipid and atherosclerosis, IL-17 signaling pathway, etc. Conclusion: This study adopted real-world research methodology and used data mining and bioinformatics technology to mine the medication law of rectal prolapse and its core drug action mechanism from the clinical information of Chinese medicine.

Rapid Onset of De Novo Rectal Prolapse Following Colpocleisis.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this video case series is to demonstrate our experience of the clinical findings and the surgical management of the rapid onset de novo rectal prolapse (RP) following colpocleisis METHODS: This is a case series of three patients who developed de novo RP within 1 month after colpocleisis, which was repaired by laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy (LVMR). The video shows the physical, radiological, and intraoperative findings of these patients. A retrospective review of our surgical cases of RP was also performed to analyze the onset timing of de novo RP after various pelvic organ prolapse (POP) procedures. RESULTS: The pathological condition of all three patients' RP was evacuation enterocele, and LVMR was feasible without postoperative complications or recurrences. In the retrospective case review of 158 RP surgeries in our institution (June 2015 to September 2023), 18 cases (11.4%) occurred following POP surgery. De novo RP following colpocleisis developed significantly earlier than those following other procedures (average: 6.1 vs 66.4 months, p = 0.010). CONCLUSIONS: Although de novo RP following colpocleisis is relatively rare, this complication could have a detrimental effect on patients' quality of life. Preoperative informed consent may be advisable before planning colpocleisis.

Evaluation and Management of Rectal Prolapse.

Rectal prolapse, or procidentia, is a common pathology for the practicing colorectal surgeon. It is associated with lifestyle limiting symptoms for the patient and frequently co-exists with other types of pelvic prolapse making multidisciplinary management key. It is primarily managed with surgical reconstruction. A number of operative approaches exist, and the optimum procedure is varied dependent upon patient characteristics.

A case of ileal caecum intussusception mimicking rectal prolapse in a 4-month-old female infant.

INTRODUCTION AND IMPORTANCE: Ilea caecum Intussusception protruding to the level of anus is a rare manifestation and potentially serious condition in infants. CASE PRESENTATION: A four-month-old infant presented with a one-day history of non-projectile vomiting, three episodes, food contents, worsened by feeding, accompanied by intermittent low-grade fever, and one instance of passing black tarry stool. After outpatient treatment, the infant showed improvement for three days, but later the mother noticed a protruding, self-reducing anal mass, hence the suspected rectal prolapse, which was then Referred for further management. CLINICAL DISCUSSION: Intussusception, the most frequent surgical emergency in infants and young children aged 3 to 6 months, is primarily idiopathic, with the ileocecal region being the most commonly affected (90 % of cases). However, when the intussusceptum advances to the anus, it's rare, often leading to misdiagnosis and mismanagement. CONCLUSION: Intussusception of the colon should be added to the differential diagnosis of symptoms and the clinical picture of rectal prolapse.

Comparative study of laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy versus perineal stapler resection for external full-thickness rectal prolapse in elderly patients: enhanced outcomes and reduced recurrence rates-a retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: In elderly patients with external full-thickness rectal prolapse (EFTRP), the exact differences in postoperative recurrence and functional outcomes between laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy (LVMR) and perineal stapler resection (PSR) have not yet been investigated. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective multicenter study on 330 elderly patients divided into LVMR group (n = 250) and PSR (n = 80) from April 2012 to April 2019. Patients were evaluated before and after surgery by Wexner incontinence scale, Altomare constipation scale, and patient satisfaction questionnaire. The primary outcomes were incidence and risk factors for EFTRP recurrence. Secondary outcomes were postoperative incontinence, constipation, and patient satisfaction. RESULTS: LVMR was associated with fewer postoperative complications (p < 0.001), lower prolapse recurrence (p < 0.001), lower Wexner incontinence score (p = 0.03), and lower Altomare's score (p = 0.047). Furthermore, LVMR demonstrated a significantly higher surgery-recurrence interval (p < 0.001), incontinence improvement (p = 0.019), and patient satisfaction (p < 0.001) than PSR. Three and 13 patients developed new symptoms in LVMR and PSR, respectively. The predictors for prolapse recurrence were LVMR (associated with 93% risk reduction of recurrence, OR 0.067, 95% CI 0.03-0.347, p = 0.001), symptom duration (prolonged duration was associated with an increased risk of recurrence, OR 1.131, 95% CI 1.036-1.236, p = 0.006), and length of prolapse (increased length was associated with a high recurrence risk (OR = 1.407, 95% CI = 1.197-1.655, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: LVMR is safe for EFTRP treatment in elderly patients with low recurrence, and improved postoperative functional outcomes. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical Trial.gov (NCT05915936), retrospectively registered on June 14, 2023.

Resolution of symptoms of rectal prolapse after repair of vaginal prolapse: A report of two cases.

Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is a very common problem that can affect any aspect of the pelvic floor. Often, vaginal and rectal prolapse occur simultaneously. Prior case reports have suggested resolution of symptoms of rectal prolapse in those with concomitant rectal and vaginal prolapse; however, the overall body of evidence is limited. We present the cases of two patients who had complete resolution of their symptoms of rectal prolapse after repair of a concomitant vaginal prolapse. Both patients underwent a traditional rectocele repair and perineoplasty, and subsequently reported complete resolution of their symptoms of rectal prolapse, which persisted at their six-month post-operative visits. The second patient ultimately canceled a previously scheduled rectopexy with colorectal surgery. Perhaps a rectocele repair with perineoplasty is limiting rectal mobility, and therefore eliminating its ability to prolapse or intussuscept and cause bothersome symptoms. We suggest that those with concomitant vaginal and rectal prolapse desiring corrective surgery first undergo a less invasive vaginal repair. Post-operative re-evaluation of the symptoms rectal prolapse might then demonstrate that a more invasive rectal prolapse repair, which may involve a colon resection and prolonged hospital stay, was not in fact needed. Further prospective and randomized study is needed to determine the long-term outcomes of concomitant rectal and vaginal prolapse in those who first undergo a vaginal repair.

Laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy in the oldest old is safe: the race is run.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy (LVMR) is considered to be the gold standard for managing rectal prolapse. Nevertheless, concerns have been expressed about the use of this procedure in elderly patients. The aim of the current study was to examine the perioperative safety of primary LVMR operations in the oldest old in comparison to younger individuals and to assess our hospital policy of offering LVMR to all patients, regardless of age and morbidity. METHODS: A retrospective study analysed demographic information, operation notes, meshes utilised, operation times, lengths of hospital stay (LOS) and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) scores of patients who underwent LVMR at Elisabeth-TweeSteden Hospital between 2012 and 2023. RESULTS: Eighty-seven female patients underwent LVMR. Nineteen patients were 80 years of age or older (OLD group); the remaining 65 patients were under the age of 80 (YOUNG group). The difference between the groups in terms of age was statistically significant. ASA scores were not significantly different. No mortality was observed. There was no statistically significant difference between the groups in terms of LOS, operation time or morbidity. Moreover, the postoperative morbidity profile was excellent in both groups. CONCLUSION: LVMR seems to be a safe operation for the "oldest old" patients with comorbidity, despite a single-centre, retrospective trial with limited follow-up. The present study suggests abandoning the dogma that "frail patients with rectal prolapse are not suitable for laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy."

Mesh Rectopexy or Resection Rectopexy for Rectal Prolapse; Is There a Gold Standard Method: A Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis and Trial Sequential Analysis.

(1) Background: Rectal prolapse is a benign condition that mainly affects females and the elderly. The most common symptoms are constipation and incontinence. The treatment of choice is surgical, but so far, there has been no gold standard method. The aim of this study is to compare the two most common intrabdominal procedures utilized for treating rectal prolapse: the resection rectopexy and the mesh rectopexy. (2) Methods: In this study, we conducted a thorough systematic review and meta-analysis of the available literature and compared the two different approaches regarding their complication rate, recurrence rate, and improvement of symptoms rate. (3) Results: No statistically significant difference between the two methods was found regarding the operating time, the length of stay, the overall complication rate, the surgical site infection rate, the cardiopulmonary complication rate, the improvement in constipation and incontinence rates, and the recurrence rate. (4) Conclusions: Our study revealed that mesh rectopexy and resection rectopexy for rectal prolapse have similar short- and long-term outcomes. As a result, the decision for the procedure used should be individualized and based on the surgeon's preference and expertise.

Resultados funcionales en el tratamiento del prolapso rectal

Introducción: El prolapso rectal es una entidad clínica poco frecuente, habitualmente acompañada de otras alteraciones del piso pélvico, con un impacto negativo en la calidad de vida. Existen pocos modelos de calidad de vida adaptados a nuestra realidad. Uno de ellos es el EQ-D5, adaptada por Olivares-Tirado. Objetivos: evaluar la calidad de vida y los resultados funcionales de la cirugía de prolapso entre 2015 y 2021 y correlacionarlos con las distintas técnicas abdominales. Material y Métodos: Este es un estudio retrospectivo, observacional, transversal y de cohorte. Se pesquisaron 84 pacientes, se incluyeron 59. Para el análisis de la calidad de vida se utilizó la Encuesta EQ-D5. Para complementar el estudio se midió el Cleveland Clinic Incontinence Score y el Constipation Scoring System. Resultados: Hubo cambios significativos en todas las encuestas aplicadas a la mejoría en pre y postoperatorio, sin existir diferencias entre técnicas quirúrgicas, pero con menor índice de estadía postoperatoria en el grupo laparoscópico. Discusión: Existe una mejoría en la calidad de vida postoperatoria que se refleja en los índices obtenidos, independiente de la técnica quirúrgica, no obstante, esta se ve atenuada en pacientes recidivados, lo que se relaciona con la literatura, también sin encontrar diferencias entre las técnicas. Existe menos constipación postoperatoria en la técnica de rectopexia ventral. Conclusiones: Existe mejoría en la calidad de vida independiente de la técnica quirúrgica, sin cambios en pacientes recidivados. Ante ello, se debiera elegir la técnica más rápida y sencilla para el manejo, idealmente laparoscópica.

Background: Rectal prolapse is a rare clinical entity, usually accompanied by other pelvic floor disorders, with a negative impact on quality of life. There are few models of quality of life adapted to our reality. One of them is the EQ-D5, adapted by Olivares-Tirado. Objectives: To evaluate the quality of life and functional outcomes of rectal prolapse surgery between 2015 and 2021 and correlate them with the different abdominal techniques. Material and Methods: This is a retrospective, observational, cross-sectional and cohort study. A total of 84 patients were screened, 59 were included. The EQ-D5 Survey was used for the analysis of quality of life. To complement the study, the Cleveland Clinic Incontinence Score and the Constipation Scoring System were measured. Results: There were significant changes in all surveys applied to pre- and postoperative improvement, with no differences between surgical techniques, but with a lower rate of postoperative stay in the laparoscopic group. Discussion: There is an improvement in the postoperative quality of life that is reflected in the indices obtained, independent of the surgical technique, however, this is attenuated in recidivated patients, which is related to the literature, also without finding differences between the techniques. There is less postoperative constipation in the ventral rectopexy technique. Conclusions: There is improvement in the quality of life independent of the surgical technique, without changes in relapsed patients. Perhaps the fastest and easiest technique for handling should be chosen, ideally laparoscopic.

Adult sigmoid intussusception resembling rectal prolapse: A case report.

BACKGROUND: Rectal prolapse arises from benign etiology. When symptoms of internal intussusception mirror those of rectal prolapse, a misdiagnosis is possible, especially under limited clinical presentation. It is crucial to recognize and differentiate rectal prolapse from internal intussusception because the two diagnoses have different prognoses. Here, we describe a case of adult sigmoid intussusception presenting as rectal prolapse. CASE SUMMARY: A 64-year-old woman with no known medical history visited a gastrointestinal outpatient department due to hard bloody stool defecation for 1 wk followed by constipation for 3 d. Colonoscopy revealed a huge polypoid ulcerated tumor at the sigmoid colon with lumen stenosis. The patient was admitted due to post-procedural dull abdominal pain. Due to failed colonoscopy reduction and stent insertion, the patient underwent sigmoid colon resection with primary end-to-end anastomosis, with the transverse colostomy pathological report showing adenocarcinoma, pT3N0M0. She recovered well from the operation and was discharged with regular outpatient clinic follow-up. CONCLUSION: Presentation and manifestation of sigmoid intussusception may resemble that of rectal prolapse, necessitating careful observation due to distinct prognostic implications.

Pediatric Rectosigmoid Atypical Juvenile Polyps Presenting With Rectal Prolapse and Acute Bleeding: A Case Report and a Comprehensive Literature Review.

Rectosigmoid solitary juvenile polyps are benign lesions, relatively frequent in childhood. The clinical debut of a pediatric polyp with bleeding is relatively frequent, but there are very few reports of rectal prolapse of polyps. We present the case of a 7-year-old female patient with no previous history who presented with rectal prolapse of a polyp with acute bleeding. An urgent endoscopic examination was performed and 2 rectosigmoid polypoid lesions were found and resected. The anatomopathological study showed that these were 2 hamartomatous polyps with mild dysplasia. The patient is asymptomatic and is being followed up. The literature concerning rectal prolapse of polyps in the pediatric population is scarce. In a pediatric patient with a rectal prolapse, this entity should be considered in the differential diagnosis.