Impact of Program Components on Perceived Organizational Support in Respiratory Care Education.

BACKGROUND: Perceived organizational support has been linked to employee commitment and job satisfaction. Understanding the effects of perceived organizational support on employees allows leaders to improve employees' performance and the success of their organizations. The purpose of this study was to identify the perceived organizational support across different respiratory care education programs in the United States. METHODS: All chairs and program directors of bachelor's of science and master's of science degree respiratory care education programs in the United States were surveyed (N = 97). The Survey of Perceived Organizational Support was modified after written approval, and the final instrument included 31 items with a Likert scale (1 = strongly disagree, 7 = strongly agree). Descriptive statistics, multiple regression, and topic modeling were used for data analysis (P < .05). RESULTS: A total of 67 respondents responded to the perceived organizational support survey; a 69% response rate. They were satisfied with their job and committed to their institutions. They also reported that faculty salaries were equitable relative to the national average, and their institutions encouraged teamwork among faculty. The respondents' titles, total years of administrative experience, students' scores on the national credentialing therapist multiple choice examination (TMC), and institutions that offer both bachelor's of science and master's of science degree programs had a direct relationship with perceived organizational support in respiratory care education programs. Age and sex were inversely related to perceived organizational support. A topic modeling analysis based on the respondents' opinions about perceived organizational support showed that the respondents frequently mentioned the words support, institution, budget, year, nursing, and experience. The respondents emphasized the importance of support, institution marketing, their years of experience, and the program budget. They also mentioned that nursing programs overshadowed respiratory care education programs at their institutions. CONCLUSIONS: Age, sex, job title, years of administrative experience, students' TMC scores, and the type of programs offered impacted perceived organizational support by respiratory care directors. Student-, program- and participant-related factors can be used to improve perceived organizational support in respiratory care education.

Simulation Use in Entry-Into-Practice Respiratory Care Programs.

BACKGROUND: Teaching and learning using simulation-based methods is increasing in health professions education; however, the prevalence of simulation use in respiratory care programs to date has not been explored. METHODS: All 412 Commission on Accreditation for Respiratory Care (CoARC)-accredited entry-into-practice respiratory care programs were e-mailed a survey inquiring about simulation use as an educational tool in their programs. RESULTS: Of the initial 412 programs contacted, 124 returned the survey, for a 30% response rate. More than three-quarters of programs reported using simulation including 87% of associate degree programs, 75% of bachelor's degree programs, and 100% of master's degree programs. Simulation modalities differed by course and program as did length of simulation activities and debriefings. Simulation hours may not be substituted for learner's clinical time under CoARC guidelines, and 69% of respondents agreed with this stance; however, 66% of responding programs have mandatory simulation learning activities, and 68% believe the amount of simulation should be increased. The survey also revealed respiratory care faculty have limited training in the use of simulation. CONCLUSIONS: Simulation-based teaching and learning is widespread and varied, but there is a lack of faculty development in its use among respiratory care programs.

Effect of Student Demographics, Prior Military Service, and Class Start Times on Academic Performance in a Respiratory Care Program.

BACKGROUND: Current research regarding the effect of demographics and characteristics of respiratory therapy students on academic performance in respiratory therapy programs is lacking. Students pursuing higher education degrees have a variety of backgrounds, and understanding the factors that impact student academic performance may improve student learning and academic outcomes. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of age, gender, prior military service, and class start time on student academic performance in respiratory care. METHODS: A retrospective comparative study was performed with 33 students from 8 cohorts enrolled in the Respiratory Therapy Program at Concorde Career College - San Antonio between 2016-2020. The students' academic performance was assessed in the Introduction to and Application of Respiratory Therapeutics (RT 210) course; the final respiratory care course, Advanced Clinical Practice (RT 250); the secure National Board of Respiratory Care Self-Assessment Examination (NBRC SAE); and the NBRC Therapist Multiple-Choice (NBRC TMC) Examination. Independent t tests and Pearson correlations were used for data analysis. A significance level of 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference between male and female students in RT 210 (P = .23), RT 250 (P = .60), the secure NBRC SAE (P = .23), and percentage of students passing the NBRC TMC (P = .96). No significant difference was found between AM and PM classes on students' academic performance in RT 210 (P = .76), RT 250 (P = .51), the secure NBRC SAE (P = .23), and percentage of students passing the NBRC TMC (P = .38). The results of this study showed no significant difference in the veteran and non-veteran student groups in RT 210 (P = .07), RT 250 (P = .69), and the secure NBRC SAE (P = .15). A strong positive correlation was discovered between academic performance in RT 210 and RT 250 courses (r = 0.725, P < .001) and between RT 210, the secure NBRC SAE (r = 0.744, P < .001), and between RT 250 and the secure NBRC SAE (r = 0.789, P < .001). The percentage of students passing the NBRC TMC was not significantly different between groups of gender (P = .64), class start times (P = .38), and prior military services (P = .96). CONCLUSIONS: Age, gender, class start times, and prior military service had no statistically significant effect on academic performance in this study. There is a positive correlation between students' performance in RT 210 and RT 250 and students' grades in these courses and the secure NBRC SAE.