Neural activation changes following attention bias modification treatment or a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor for social anxiety disorder.

BACKGROUND: Delineation of changes in neural function associated with novel and established treatments for social anxiety disorder (SAD) can advance treatment development. We examined such changes following selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) and attention bias modification (ABM) variant - gaze-contingent music reward therapy (GC-MRT), a first-line and an emerging treatments for SAD. METHODS: Eighty-one patients with SAD were allocated to 12-week treatments of either SSRI or GC-MRT, or waitlist (ns = 22, 29, and 30, respectively). Baseline and post-treatment functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data were collected during a social-threat processing task, in which attention was directed toward and away from threat/neutral faces. RESULTS: Patients who received GC-MRT or SSRI showed greater clinical improvement relative to patients in waitlist. Compared to waitlist patients, treated patients showed greater activation increase in the right inferior frontal gyrus and anterior cingulate cortex when instructed to attend toward social threats and away from neutral stimuli. An additional anterior cingulate cortex cluster differentiated between the two active groups. Activation in this region increased in ABM and decreased in SSRI. In the ABM group, symptom change was positively correlated with neural activation change in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. CONCLUSIONS: Brain function measures show both shared and treatment-specific changes following ABM and SSRI treatments for SAD, highlighting the multiple pathways through which the two treatments might work. Treatment-specific neural responses suggest that patients with SAD who do not fully benefit from SSRI or ABM may potentially benefit from the alternative treatment, or from a combination of the two. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, Identifier: NCT03346239. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03346239.

Sertraline induced acute hepatocellular liver injury in patient with major depressive disorder: a case report.

This case report describes a patient with major depressive disorder (MDD) who developed acute hepatocellular liver injury after being treated with sertraline, a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI). The diagnosis of MDD was made two years prior, and the patient had previously responded partially to escitalopram and cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT). Upon switching to sertraline 50 mg daily, the patient presented with severe symptoms indicative of acute liver injury, including elevated liver enzymes, jaundice, and gastrointestinal distress. Following the discontinuation of sertraline, the patient's liver function tests gradually normalized over a 90-day period, confirming the diagnosis of sertraline-induced hepatotoxicity. This case underscores the importance of continuous monitoring for potential liver injury in patients treated with sertraline. The findings contribute to the existing body of evidence on the hepatotoxic risks associated with SSRIs and highlight the need for personalized treatment strategies to mitigate adverse effects and enhance patient safety. Further research is needed to explore the long-term safety and efficacy of sertraline, particularly in vulnerable populations.

Preoperative SSRI use increases perioperative transfusion need in patients undergoing surgical procedures on the hip joint.

PURPOSE: Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) are commonly prescribed for psychiatric conditions. Previous studies have shown that SSRIs can increase bleeding risk by affecting platelet aggregation. However, their impact on perioperative outcomes in hip surgery remains uncertain. This case-control study examines the link between preoperative SSRI use and perioperative transfusion requirements in hip surgery patients. METHODS: Data from the M161Ortho dataset of Pearl Diver patient records database were utilized. Patients who underwent hip joint surgery between 2010 and 2022 and had documented preoperative SSRI use within one month prior to surgery were included. Patients with coagulopathy disorders or coagulopathy medication use were excluded. Perioperative transfusion need was defined as receiving red blood cell or whole blood transfusions on the same date or within 10 days following the surgery. RESULTS: A total of 75,374 patients with preoperative SSRI use were matched with an equal number of non-SSRI users. Preoperative SSRI use was associated with an increased risk of requiring perioperative transfusion (5.7% vs. 5.1%, P < 0.001). Subgroup analysis demonstrated increased transfusion risk in patients undergoing pinning (2.6% vs. 1.8%, P = 0.02), open reduction with internal fixation (ORIF) (8.9% vs. 8.2%, P = 0.007), and total hip arthroplasty (THA) (3.8% vs. 3.4%, P < 0.001), but no significant difference was observed in patients undergoing hemiarthroplasty. CONCLUSION: Clinicians should be aware of the potential risk of increased perioperative transfusion requirements in hip surgery patients using SSRIs, especially during pinning, ORIF, and THA procedures. It is essential to consider this when managing patients on SSRIs before hip surgery.

A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing the Quality of Life and Medication Adherence in Patients on Antidepressant Monotherapy.

Background and objectives The quality of life declines with the growing severity of major depressive disorder (MDD). In depressed people, medication adherence and the quality of life are mutually corrosive. These concerns spurred the investigation of relationships between treatment outcomes and adherence levels. Limited studies are looking at how vortioxetine, escitalopram, and vilazodone affect these parameters. We aimed to detect how the Short Form-36 (SF-36) had changed 16 weeks after the baseline. The connection between treatment results (as expressed by the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale or HDRS) and medication adherence (as reflected by the Morisky Medication Adherence Scale-8 or MMAS-8) was also explored. Methods An open-label, randomized, three-arm trial with 96 MDD patients was conducted. For 16 weeks, the participants were put into three groups per a 1:1:1 ratio and administered tablets of vilazodone (20-40 mg/day), escitalopram (10-20 mg/day), or vortioxetine (5-20 mg/day). There were two test drugs: vilazodone and vortioxetine; the control was escitalopram. Four weeks apart, follow-up appointments were set after the baseline visit. The HDRS, mental and physical components of SF-36, and MMAS-8 scores were evaluated in the per-protocol (PP) population. Reduced HDRS scores were indicative of improved depression symptoms. Higher MMAS-8 and SF-36 scores indicated high drug adherence and enhanced quality of life. Our analysis used the Kruskal-Wallis test, the Bonferroni correction, and the Sankey diagram. In the Clinical Trial Registry-India (CTRI), we recorded this study prospectively (2022/07/043808). Results One hundred nine (81.34%) of the 134 individuals we examined were eligible. The PP population consisted of 96 (88.07%) of them who wrapped up the 16-week study. The mean age of the group was 46.3 ± 6.2 years. For each of the three groups, the SF-36 physical component scores revealed a median difference of 24.5 (23.8-26.0), 24.0 (22.8-25.3), and 27.0 (25.0-29.0) (p = 0.001). Accordingly, the mental components of their SF-36 scores showed a median difference of 32.0 (31.0-33.3), 31.0 (29.8-34.3), and 36.0 (33.0-38.0) (p = 0.001). A median difference of -15.0 (-16.0 to -14.0), -16.0 (-17.0 to -15.0), and -16.0 (-17.0 to -15.8) was observed in the HDRS scores after 16 weeks, with respect to the baseline (p < 0.001). The median MMAS-8 scores at 16 weeks were 6.0 (6.0-7.0), 6.8 (6.0-7.0), and 7.5 (6.5-8.0) (p = 0.031). The Sankey diagram illustrated the connection between better treatment results, increased medication compliance, and decreased symptoms of depression. Conclusion In comparison to vilazodone and escitalopram, vortioxetine demonstrated a statistically significant decrease in HDRS scores and an improvement in the physical and mental component scores of the SF-36. Clinical improvements were evident in the individuals' drug adherence levels. Larger-scale studies are advised to investigate the effects of these medications on the quality of life, medication adherence, and treatment outcomes.

Yawning as a Rare Side Effect With Increased Escitalopram Dose: A Case Report.

Yawning is a normal physiological process that occurs naturally in all human beings in different settings, such as hunger, drowsiness, or stress. It is typically harmless, but abnormal yawning can be seen in many medical conditions. In psychiatry, it frequently occurs in disorders like depression, insomnia, and anxiety due to disturbed sleep. It has also been observed as an adverse reaction of some drugs, like escitalopram, a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor. Escitalopram is a widely prescribed, well-tolerated antidepressant and antianxiety drug that can induce a range of side effects, one of which is excessive yawning. Its excessive occurrence can be distressing for patients, affecting their socio-occupational functioning. Clinically, differentiating yawning induced by escitalopram treatment from that in depression can be a diagnostic hurdle. Awareness and recognition of this lesser known side effect can improve patient outcomes by allowing for timely adjustments and easing the discomfort.

Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor and Serotonin-Noradrenaline Reuptake Inhibitor Withdrawal Changes DSM Presentation of Mental Disorders: Results from the Diagnostic Clinical Interview for Drug Withdrawal.

INTRODUCTION: Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs) may cause withdrawal at dose decrease, discontinuation, or switch. Current diagnostic methods (e.g., DSM) do not take such phenomenon into account. Using a new nosographic classification of withdrawal syndromes due to SSRI/SNRI decrease or discontinuation [by Psychother Psychosom. 2015;84(2):63-71], we explored whether DSM is adequate to identify DSM disorders when withdrawal occurs. METHODS: Seventy-five self-referred patients with a diagnosis of withdrawal syndrome due to discontinuation of SSRI/SNRI, diagnosed via the Diagnostic Clinical Interview for Drug Withdrawal 1 - New Symptoms of Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors or Serotonin-Norepinephrine Reuptake Inhibitors (DID-W1), and at least one DSM-5 diagnosis were analyzed. RESULTS: In 58 cases (77.3%), the DSM-5 diagnosis of current mental disorder was not confirmed when the DID-W1 diagnosis of current withdrawal syndrome was established. In 13 cases (17.3%), the DSM-5 diagnosis of past mental disorder was not confirmed when criteria for DID-W1 diagnosis of lifetime withdrawal syndrome were met. In 3 patients (4%), the DSM-5 diagnoses of current and past mental disorders were not confirmed when the DID-W1 diagnoses of current and lifetime withdrawal syndromes were taken into account. The DSM-5 diagnoses most frequently mis-formulated were current panic disorder (50.7%, n = 38) and past major depressive episode (18.7%, n = 14). CONCLUSION: DSM needs to be complemented by clinimetric tools, such as the DID-W1, to detect withdrawal syndromes induced by SSRI/SNRI discontinuation, decrease, or switch, following long-term use.

Effect of bariatric surgery on nutritional and metabolic parameters: does the type of antidepressant medication matter?

PURPOSE: Depression is prevalent in patients undergoing bariatric surgery (BSx). Long-term use of antidepressant is associated with weight gain, particularly the use of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs). Little is known about whether different types of antidepressants affect the response to BSx. The purpose of this study was to determine the relationship between SSRI use and nutritional and biochemical measurements in those with obesity pre-/post-BSx. METHODS: This is a cross-sectional and prospective cohort study. Patients were enrolled pre-BSx and divided into 3 groups: SSRI, non-SSRI and no antidepressant. Nutritional, biochemical and pharmacological data were collected pre- and 6 months post-BSx. RESULTS: Pre-BSx, 77 patients were enrolled: 89.6% female, median age 45 years and body mass index (BMI) of 45.3 kg/m2. 14.3% were taking SSRIs and had a significantly higher BMI (52.1 kg/m2) compared to 62.3% in no antidepressant (46.0 kg/m2) and 23.4% in non-SSRI antidepressants (43.1 kg/m2). At 6 months post-BSx (n = 58), the SSRI group still had significantly higher BMI in comparison to the other two groups. No other significant differences found between groups. CONCLUSION: Despite higher BMI, patients taking SSRI and undergoing BSx had similar responses, based on nutritional and biochemical parameters, to those on non-SSRI or no antidepressants. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III: Evidence obtained from well-designed cohort or case-control analytic studies.

Cutaneous Small-Vessel Vasculitis Induced by Escitalopram: A Case-Based Brief Review of the Literature.

A 65-year-old male with multiple comorbidities and recently diagnosed with diabetic kidney disease developed upper and lower extremity rash following escitalopram initiation for his depressive mood. Clinical assessment and skin biopsy confirmed cutaneous small-vessel vasculitis (CSVV), prompting drug discontinuation and oral methylprednisolone therapy. The resolution of the rash was achieved within a week. This rare case of CSVV induced by escitalopram highlights the importance of timely recognition and management of drug-induced CSVV and adds to the limited literature on selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor-associated CSVV.

Management and Treatment of Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (OCD): A Literature Review.

Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) is a prevalent and debilitating mental health condition. This literature review examines the latest strategies in managing and treating OCD, with an emphasis on psychotherapy, pharmacological interventions, and neurosurgical options. A comprehensive literature search utilizing PubMed, Google Scholar, ClinicalKey, and Embase databases was conducted. Utilizing chosen keywords, the resulting articles were filtered based on inclusion and exclusion criteria. Included articles were used to discuss current research regarding OCD treatment and management. Findings reveal the efficacy and obstacles of treatments such as cognitive-behavioral therapy, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs), and evidence-based neurosurgical methods, offering a broad perspective on OCD management. We discuss the limitations of these established treatments and examine the innovative response of neurosurgery in treating patients with OCD. This review highlights the importance of individualized treatment plans and areas for future research.

Antidepressant drugs and risk of developing glioma: a national registry-based case control study and a meta-analysis.

The aim of the present study was to investigate if use of antidepressants is related to the risk of developing lower (WHO grade 2-3) and higher grade (WHO grade 4) glioma. A registry-based case-control study was performed using 1283 glioma cases and 6400 age-, sex- and geographically matched controls, diagnosed in Sweden 2009-2013. Conditional logistic regression was used to analyze whether Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors (SSRIs) or non-SSRIs were associated with the risk of developing lower- or higher-grade glioma in the study population. Our results show that use of antidepressant medication was not associated with the risk of developing glioma. We also performed a meta-analysis in which the dataset from the present study was combined with results from two previous epidemiological studies to answer the same questions. The meta-analysis showed a modest risk reduction of developing glioma in relation to antidepressant treatment (OR 0.90 [95% CI 0.83-0.97]), when all glioma subgroups and all forms of antidepressant medications were combined. In conclusion, it remains possible that antidepressants may have common monoaminergic mechanism(s) that reduce the risk of developing glioma.

Fetal ductal constriction caused by SSRI: A case report.

A 31-week fetus was diagnosed with premature ductal constriction due to maternal treatment with sertraline. An emergent Cesarean section was performed at 32 gestational weeks. The baby was born in a severely depressed condition, with supra-systemic pulmonary hypertension, requiring intubation, mechanical ventilation, and milrinone infusion. The patient's condition improved rapidly, allowing weaning from the ventilator and the inodilator therapy. The baby was discharged home at 38 weeks postmenstrual age, in good general condition, without any signs of pulmonary hypertension, requiring no respiratory support. The echo examinations on the first and third months after birth were normal.

Improvement in Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor-Associated Sexual Dysfunction With Buspirone: Examining the Evidence.

Sexual dysfunction is a common problem for patients taking antidepressants, with the highest prevalence rates observed with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs). Sexual dysfunction can be distressing for patients and may lead to medication non-adherence; thus, it is important for the prescribers to be aware of the available treatment strategies, as well as of the strength of the evidence that supports their use. We present the case of a patient who developed delayed ejaculation after the initiation of sertraline for the treatment of depression. The patient's sexual dysfunction resolved after the addition of buspirone. A discussion of this case is followed by a review of the existing literature examining the possible role of buspirone in the treatment of SSRI-induced sexual dysfunction.

Serum brain-derived neurotrophic factor, Val66Met polymorphism and open-label SSRI treatment response in Major Depressive Disorder.

BACKGROUND: Brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) has been implicated in the therapeutic action of antidepressants and possibly in the pathophysiology of Major Depressive Disorder (MDD). Clinical studies of peripheral blood levels of BDNF in MDD have provided conflicting results, and there are also conflicting reports regarding the predictive value of peripheral BDNF levels for antidepressant treatment response. The present study investigated the association between serum BDNF levels, the BDNF Val66Met polymorphism (rs6265), clinical characteristics and SSRI treatment response. METHODS: This open-label clinical trial included 99 physically healthy, unmedicated MDD participants and 70 healthy controls. Following a baseline assessment, 53 of the MDD participants completed an eight-week, open-label course of SSRI antidepressant treatment. Serum BDNF levels and Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HDRS) ratings were examined at baseline and after eight weeks of treatment. Antidepressant response was defined as a decrease in HDRS ratings of > 50% from baseline to the end-of-treatment. Finally, serum BDNF levels and SSRI treatment response were compared between MDD participants who were heterozygous or homozygous for the Met allele ("Met-carriers") and individuals homozygous for the Val allele. RESULTS: Serum BDNF levels at baseline were significantly higher in the unmedicated MDD participants compared to healthy controls (15.90 ng/ml vs 13.75 ng/ml, t (167) = -2.041, p = 0.043). In a post-hoc analysis, this difference was seen in the female but not male participants (16.85 ng/ml vs 14.06 ng/ml, t (91) = -2.067, p = 0.042; 14.86 ng/ml vs 13.31 ng/ml, t (74) = -0.923, p = 0.359). Baseline serum BDNF levels were not associated with treatment responder status or with absolute change in depression ratings over the course of 8-week SSRI treatment (p = 0.599). In both Responders and Non-responders, no significant changes in serum BDNF levels were found over the 8-week period of SSRI-treatment (16.32 ng/ml vs 16.23 ng/ml, t (18) = 0.060, p = 0.953; 16.04 ng/ml vs 15.61 ng/ml, t (29) = 0.438, p = 0.665, respectively). Further, no differences were found in serum BDNF levels prior to treatment between MDD Met-carriers and MDD Val/Val homozygotes (15.32 ng/ml vs 16.36 ng/ml, t (85) = 0.747, p = 0.457), and no differences were found in post-treatment serum BDNF (F1,42= 0.031, p = 0.862). However, MDD Val/Val homozygotes showed significantly greater antidepressant responses at week 8 than did MDD Met-carriers (F1,46 = 4.366, p = 0.043). CONCLUSION: Our results do not support sufficient reliability of using peripheral BDNF to characterize depression or to predict antidepressant response in clinical use. The role of sex in moderating BDNF differences in depression, and the role of BDNF gene polymorphisms in predicting antidepressant response, remain to be further investigated. We conclude that, while central nervous system BDNF is likely involved in antidepressant efficacy and in aspects of MDD pathophysiology, its reflection in serum BDNF levels is of limited diagnostic or prognostic utility.

Design, synthesis, and biological evaluation of aralkyl piperazine and piperidine derivatives targeting SSRI/5-HT1A/5-HT7.

Serotonin reuptake inhibition combined with the action targeting 5-hydroxytryptamine receptor subtypes can serve as a potential target for the development of antidepressant drugs. Herein a series of new aralkyl piperazines and piperidines were designed and synthesized by the structural modifications of the previously discovered aralkyl piperidine compound 1, targeting SSRI/5-HT1A/5-HT7. The results exhibited that compound 5a showed strong binding to 5-HT1A and 5-HT7 (Ki of 0.46 nM, 2.7 nM, respectively) and a high level of serotonin reuptake inhibition (IC50 of 1.9 nM), all of which were significantly elevated compared to 1. In particular, compound 5a showed weaker inhibitory activity against hERG than 1, and demonstrated good stability in liver microsomes in vitro. The preliminary screening using FST indicated that orally administered 5a, at a high dose, could reduce immobility time in mice markedly, indicating potential antidepressant activity.

Exploring Esketamine's Therapeutic Outcomes as an FDA-Designated Breakthrough for Treatment-Resistant Depression and Major Depressive Disorder With Suicidal Intent: A Narrative Review.

The expansive spectrum of major depressive disorder (MDD) continues to pose challenges for psychiatrists to treat effectively. Oral antidepressant (OAD) medications that alter monoamine neurotransmitters, mainly selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and selective norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs), have been the mainstay of therapy for decades. Although these drugs have been largely beneficial, a considerable subset of patients do not respond adequately to multiple conventional therapies administered for an appropriate length of time, leading to a diagnosis of treatment-resistant depression (TRD). Ketamine, a non-monoaminergic drug, has long been known for its beneficial effects on TRD when given intravenously (IV). Between 2019 and 2020, an intranasal formulation of the S (+) enantiomer of racemic ketamine, esketamine (ESK), was granted "breakthrough designation" by the FDA and approved for the indications of TRD and MDD patients exhibiting acute suicidal intent. The objective of this narrative review was to review the academic literature and collect clinical evidence that may corroborate intranasal ESK's effectiveness for its approved indications while addressing its safety and tolerability profile, adverse effects, and impact on cognition. An overview of the drug's origins, pharmacology, and standard treatment regimen are provided. The outcomes from double-blinded randomized control trials (DB-RCTs) of ESK are outlined to demonstrate the efficacy and safety data leading to its FDA approval, along with its long-term post-market safety outcomes. Comparative trials between ESK and ketamine are then evaluated to highlight ESK's consideration as a more practical alternative to ketamine in common clinical practice. The authors further discuss currently approved and developing therapies for TRD, propose future research directions, and identify the inherent limitations of the review and further research. To conduct the research required, three digital databases (PubMed, Medline, and ClinicalTrials.gov) were queried to search for key terms, including ketamine, esketamine, treatment-resistant depression, and biomarkers, using automation tools along with selective search engine results. After streamlining the results by title and abstract and removing duplicates, a total of 37 results were chosen, of which 18 are clinical trials. A reduction in the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) score was the primary efficacy endpoint for most of these clinical trials. In conclusion, intranasal ESK, when used as an adjunct to market OADs, shows greater efficacy in treating TRD and MDD with suicidal intent compared to OADs and placebo alone and provides a more suitable alternative to IV ketamine. It is important to note that further research is required to fully understand the novel mechanism of action of ESK, as well as the establishment of a consensus definition of TRD, which may facilitate better detection and treatment protocols. More focused quantitative and qualitative ESK studies are needed, as well as those pertaining to its use in patients with co-existing mental illnesses.

Is SSRI use a risk factor for intracranial hemorrhage after craniotomy for tumor resection?

Introduction: Prior studies have identified SSRI use as a risk factor for certain adverse bleeding outcomes. However, the risk of significant bleeding from perioperative SSRI use after brain tumor resection remains largely undetermined. This study evaluates if patients taking SSRIs perioperatively have a higher risk of intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) following elective craniotomy for tumor resection. Methods: Researchers reviewed electronic medical records of patients age 18 and older, who received elective craniotomy for tumor resection between 2010 and 2019. Data collection included subject demographics and relevant medical history. We compared intracranial hemorrhage rates and risks between perioperative SSRI-use cohorts. Results: Of 1,061 patients, 796 (75%) did not use SSRIs perioperatively while 265 (25%) used SSRIs perioperatively. Among those using perioperative SSRIs, 8 patients (3.0%) experienced an ICH within 1 week and 11 patients (4.2%) had an ICH within 1 month. Similarly, for those who stopped SSRI use perioperatively, we found 31 patients (3.9%) experienced an ICH within 1 week and 40 patients (5.0%) had an ICH within 1 month. Using logistic regression analysis, the relative risk for perioperative SSRI-use and ICH was statistically non-significant at 0.692 (95% CI: 0.260 - 1.839, p = 0.460). Conclusions: Based on our results, perioperative SSRI use does not appear to result in an increased risk of bleeding within 1 week or month of craniotomy for tumor resection. These results remained consistent when controlled for several additional bleeding comorbidities and demographics between cohorts.

Management of anhedonia after epilepsy surgery.

Anhedonia is clinically defined as difficulty or inability to feel pleasure or to be motivated to perform activities that were previously pleasurable. Anhedonia is a core feature of depressive disorders but can be present in other conditions such as substance use and anxiety disorders. Herein we report the case of a 34-year-old female who developed marked anhedonia after left cortico-amygdalohippocampectomy. Despite optimal seizure control, the person struggled with anhedonia and other depressive symptoms. After ruling out medico-neurologic complications, she was prescribed with a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor and cognitive-behavioral therapy. Anhedonia can be a challenging neuropsychiatric presentation that requires ruling out the effects of antiseizure medications, neurosurgery, and other drugs before prescribing antidepressants.

Trajectory and magnitude of response in adults with anxiety disorders: a Bayesian hierarchical modeling meta-analysis of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, serotonin norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors, and benzodiazepines.

BACKGROUND: How the trajectory of response to medication (and placebo response) varies among selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), serotonin norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs), benzodiazepines and across anxiety disorders is unknown. METHODS: We performed a meta-analysis using weekly symptom severity data from randomized, parallel-group, placebo-controlled trials of SSRIs, SNRIs, and benzodiazepines in adults with anxiety disorders. Response was modeled for the standardized change in anxiety using Bayesian hierarchical models. RESULTS: Across 122 trials (N=15,760), SSRIs, SNRIs, and benzodiazepines produced significant improvement in anxiety compared to placebo. Benzodiazepines produced faster improvement by the first week of treatment (p < 0.001). By week 8, the response for benzodiazepines and SSRIs (p = 0.103) and SNRIs (p = 0.911) did not differ nor did SSRIs and SNRIs differ (p = 0.057), although for patients with generalized anxiety disorder (GAD), the benzodiazepines produced greater improvement than SNRIs at week 8 (difference - 12.42, CrI: -25.05 to -0.78, p = 0.037). Medication response was similar across anxiety disorders except for benzodiazepines, which produced greater improvement over the first 4 weeks compared to SSRIs and SNRIs in panic disorder. For SSRIs and SNRIs, women improved more than men, and for benzodiazepines, older patients improved more compared to younger patients. Finally, placebo response plateaued by week 4 of treatment, and, at week 8, social anxiety disorder trials had lower placebo response compared to other anxiety disorders. CONCLUSIONS: Benzodiazepines show early improvement compared to SSRIs and SNRIs. However, by week 8, all treatments yield similar results. Patient characteristics influence the improvement trajectory and magnitude, suggesting potential for personalized medication selection.

Bleeding in patients on concurrent treatment with a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) and low-dose acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) compared with SSRI or low-dose ASA alone-A systematic review and meta-analysis.

AIMS: The aim of this study was to systematically review whether concurrent treatment with an SSRI and low-dose ASA increases the risk of bleeding compared with treatment with an SSRI alone or ASA alone. METHODS: Medline, Embase, the Cochrane Library, PsycINFO and Web of Science (from database inception to January 2023) were searched according to PICO: P = patients on treatment with an SSRI and/or low-dose ASA; I = intervention: SSRI + ASA; C = comparison: ASA or SSRI alone; O = outcomes: bleeding/major bleeding. The included articles were assessed using checklists. Studies without major risk of bias formed the basis for the conclusions. Extracted data were pooled using random-effects meta-analyses. Certainty of evidence was assessed according to GRADE. RESULTS: Twenty-four studies met the PICO and were included. One randomized and six nonrandomized studies were assessed not to have major risk of bias. Regarding SSRI + ASA vs. ASA only, the pooled hazard ratio of three nonrandomized studies (n = 38 467) was 1.37 (95% confidence interval: 1.10; 1.70; I2 = 0%), and the pooled odds ratio of two nonrandomized studies (n = 28 296) was 0.95 (0.77; 1.19; I2 = 0%). Regarding SSRI + ASA vs. SSRI only, the randomized controlled trial (n = 1048) reported a hazard ratio of 1.82 (0.66; 5.02), the hazard ratio being 1.60 (1.24; 2.06) for ASA vs. placebo in patients without SSRI treatment; and one nonrandomized controlled study (n = 18 920) reported an incidence rate ratio of 1.03 (0.96; 1.12). CONCLUSIONS: The compiled evidence was too uncertain to support an interaction when an SSRI is added to low-dose ASA. Low-dose ASA added to an SSRI may imply an increased risk of bleeding primarily attributable to the initiation of ASA.

The potential predictors for treatment-resistance depression after selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors therapy in Han Chinese: A resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging study.

AIM: Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) are among the most important antidepressants. However, there is limited research on predicting the occurrence of treatment-resistant depression (TRD) after 5 years. Examining the predictive effect of TRD occurrence using resting-state fMRI in patients initiating SSRIs treatment at the onset of major depressive disorder (MDD) could potentially enhance TRD management. METHODS: A total of 60 first-episode drug-naive MDD patients who met the criteria, along with 41 healthy controls of Han Chinese ethnicity, were recruited. All MDD patients received SSRIs as the initial treatment for relieving depressive symptoms. Resting-state fMRI scans were conducted for all subjects. Follow-up assessments were conducted over a period of five years, during which MDD patients were categorized into treatment-resistant depression (TRD) and non-treatment-resistant depression (NRD) groups based on disease progression. Amplitude of low-frequency fluctuations (ALFF), fractional amplitude of low-frequency fluctuations (fALFF), and Regional Homogeneity (ReHo) values were calculated and compared among the three groups. Additionally, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were employed to identify potential predictors. RESULTS: After 5 years of follow-up, it was found that 43 MDD patients were classified as NRD, while 17 were classified as TRD. In comparison to TRD, NRD exhibited decreased ALFF in the left middle cingulum gyrus (MCG.L) and in the right middle frontal gyrus (MFG.R), as well as decreased ReHo in MCG.L. Furthermore, NRD showed increased fALFF in the left precuneus (PCUN.L). The area under the curve (AUC) values were as follows: 0.724 (MCG.L by ALFF), 0.732 (MFG.R), 0.767 (PCUN.L), 0.774 (MCG.L by ReHo), 0.878 (combined), 0.547 (HAMD), and 0.408 (HAMA) respectively. CONCLUSION: The findings suggest that PCUN.L, MFG.R, MCG.L, and the combined measures may indicate the possibility of developing TRD after 5 years when SSRIs are used as the initial therapy for relieving depressive symptoms in MDD patients.