Sperm concentration of boar semen doses and sperm quality: Novel perspectives based on the extender type and sperm resilience.

This study evaluated the effect of sperm concentration of boar semen doses on their capacity to maintain its motility over the thermo-resistance test (TRT; sperm resilience) and verified if the extender type (short or long-term) could influence this effect. Thirty ejaculates from five crossbred mature PIC® boars were used, and a factorial design was followed to produce semen doses with 1.5 billion cells in 45 or 90 mL, using Beltsville Thawing Solution (BTS) or Androstar® Plus (APlus). Then, low-concentration doses (16.7 × 106 cells/mL in 90 mL) and higher-concentration doses (33.3 × 106 cells/mL in 45 mL) with BTS or APlus were produced and stored at 17 °C for 168 h. At 72 h, during the TRT, the low-concentration doses (16.7 × 106 cells/mL) lost three-fold less motility than doses with 33.3 × 106 cells/mL (P < 0.01), regardless of the extender type (11. 5% vs. 30.5% of initial motility, respectively). Similar results were found when the TRT was carried out at 168 h, with low-concentration doses losing two-fold less motility (11.4%) than highly concentrated doses (25.9%; P < 0.01). No sperm concentration effect was observed on membrane integrity or mitochondrial membrane potential (P ≥ 0.23). The osmolarity was not affected by the sperm concentration (P = 0.56), only by the extender and the storage time (P < 0.01). In conclusion, the sperm concentration effect on sperm quality was not influenced by extender type, and the data suggest that a low concentration of semen doses positively affects sperm resilience.

Estimation of sperm concentration limits to produce intrauterine insemination doses in swine.

This study evaluated the effect of sperm concentration of boar semen doses, for intrauterine artificial insemination (IUAI), on semen quality and established concentration limits for their production. Twenty ejaculates from four crossbred mature PIC® boars were collected to produce 50 mL semen doses in a split sample, reaching the following sperm concentrations: ~20, 30, 60, and 100 × 106 cells/mL. Doses were produced using Androstar® Plus, stored at 17°C, and evaluated until 120 h of storage. There was a linear decrease in sperm motility as the sperm concentration increased (p linear < .01). The concentration which no longer affected the total and progressive motility was 59 and 55 × 106 cells/mL, respectively (corresponding to 71% and 62%, respectively). The pH linearly decreased as the sperm concentration increased (p < .01); yet, at 72 and 120 h, the parameter dramatically reduced in boar semen doses with 60 and 100 × 106 cells/mL. The percentage of cells with intact plasma and acrosomal membranes or with high mitochondrial membrane potential was not influenced by the sperm concentration (p ≥ .15). In conclusion, sperm motility was negatively affected in highly (60 and 100 × 106 cells/mL) concentrated doses. To achieve suitable sperm motility, boar semen doses may not surpass the sperm concentration of 55 × 106 cells/mL. The effect of low-concentrated boar semen doses on sperm quality still needs to be better evaluated, mainly considering the influence of extender type and thermo-resistance conditions.