Expression of pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines during anti-proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 therapy in patients with statin-resistant familial hypercholesterolemia.

Background: Some clinical dyslipidemia cases do not respond to statins, known as statin-resistant familial hypercholesterolemia (SR-FH), in which patients are under a high cardiovascular risk despite statin therapy. Therefore, novel therapeutic alternatives are required. Proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitors (PCSK9i) reduce cholesterol levels and cardiovascular disease risk, particularly in patients with SR-FH, where PCSK9i may differentially affect pro- and anti-inflammatory mediators depending on the clinical setting. Aim: To evaluate the effect of PCSK9i treatment on pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines in patients with SR-FH. Methods: Before-after comparison, quasi-experimental, single-center study in patients with SR-FH. Blood samples were processed to obtain complete blood counts of glycated hemoglobin and serum lipid levels. Flow cytometry was performed to characterize baseline circulating M1- and M2-macrophages and monocytes. Multiplexing of plasma samples was used to compare plasma fraktaline, interleukins (ILs), monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1), and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha. The endpoints were lower serum lipid levels and pro-inflammatory mediator modification. Results: Twenty patients with SR-FH, aged 58 years and most of them males, were included, with a mean body-mass index of 26.4 and showing ischemic heart disease and similar values of baseline M1- and M2-macrophages and monocytes. Six-month iPSCK-9 therapy considerably reduced LDLc, increased anti-inflammatory cytokine (IL-4), and modified pro-inflammatory cytokine (TNF-alpha and MCP-1) levels. No notable effects were observed for the other markers. Conclusion: PCSK9i therapy exerted subclinical anti-inflammatory and anti-atherogenic effects, indicating potential benefits for clinical outcomes.

Hepatic histopathological and morphometric changes in male mice exposed to rosuvastatin from pre-puberty to adulthood: a possible adaptive hepatic response.

Lifestyle changes, such as poor eating habits and a reduction in physical exercise, have impaired human lipid profiles. Statins are widely used to treat dyslipidemias, of which rosuvastatin shows greater improvement in the lipid profile and may be used since childhood. This study aimed to assess the hepatic effects when male mice were given 0.9% saline solution or doses of rosuvastatin of 1.5 or 5.5 mg/kg/day from postnatal day (PND) 23 until PND 80. Body mass gain and water and food consumption were monitored during the treatment. Mice were euthanized on PND 80 when blood was collected for serum obtainment, and several organs were collected and weighed. Serum was used for evaluating lipid profiles and markers of hepatic injuries. The liver was assessed for histopathological, morphometric, and stereological changes. There was a temporary reduction in body mass gain and water and food consumption in the rosuvastatin-exposed groups. Both rosuvastatin-treated groups exhibited reduced total cholesterol levels and showed signs of hepatic tissue adaptation in response to prolonged exposure, such as sinusoidal dilation, inflammatory infiltrates, and cell death of hepatocytes. These results are considered side effects of the treatment and may indicate a hepatic adaptation to the chronic exposure.

Association of statin use with risk of depression and anxiety: A prospective large cohort study.

OBJECTIVES: To examine associations between regular statin use and the incidence of depression and anxiety. METHODS: This cohort was based on UK Biobank participants without depression/anxiety recruited between 2006 and 2010. The self-reported regular statin use was collected at baseline. Depression and anxiety outcomes were assessed by diagnostic interviews (international classification of diseases codes) and nondiagnostic scales (mental well-being questionnaires). Cox proportional hazards models adjusted for a wide range of confounders were used to estimate associations of statins with incident depression/anxiety. RESULTS: Among 363,551 eligible participants, 55,838 reported regular statin use. During a 13-year follow-up, 14,765 cases of depression and 15,494 cases of anxiety were identified. Compared with non-statin users, statin use was associated with reduced risk of depression (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.87; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.81, 0.94) and anxiety (HR: 0.90, 95% CI: 0.84, 0.97). Effects of statins on depression were consistent in sensitivity analyses and may be less influenced by unmeasured confounders. However, results of online survey data showed that statin use might not be associated with incident anxiety (HR: 0.96, 95% CI: 0.85, 1.09). CONCLUSION: Regular statin use was associated with a lower risk of depression. No clear associations between statin use and anxiety were found.

Assessing the role of statin therapy in bladder cancer: evidence from a Mendelian Randomization study.

Background: Statins, which are medications that lower lipid levels, are extensively used to decrease cardiovascular disease risk. Recently, the use of statins in cancer prevention has attracted considerable interest. However, it is still unclear whether the use of statins has a causal effect on bladder cancer. Methods: The two-sample Mendelian Randomization (MR) was performed to infer the causal relationship between statin therapy (atorvastatin, simvastatin, and rosuvastatin) and bladder cancer. Single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP)-based genome-wide association studies (GWAS) of statins (atorvastatin, simvastatin, and rosuvastatin) were gathered from the UK Biobank, involving 462,933 participants. We acquired summary-level genetic data on bladder cancer from a European cohort of 175,121 individuals. The inverse variance weighted (IVW) method was the main analytical technique used, supplemented by MR-Egger, weighted median, weighted mode, and simple mode to estimate causal effects. Additionally, sensitivity analyses were conducted to verify the robustness and reliability of our findings. Results: Based on the IVW analysis, we identified a significant causal association between rosuvastatin use and a decreased risk of bladder cancer, with genetic analysis inferring the substantial reduction in odds (OR = 3.52E-19, 95% CI: 5.48E-32-2.26E-06, p = 0.005). In contrast, the IVW results did not reveal a statistically significant relationship between the genetically estimated use of atorvastatin (OR = 7.42E-03, 95% CI: 6.80E-06-8.084, p = 0.169) or simvastatin (OR = 0.135, 95% CI: 0.008-2.330, p = 0.168) and bladder cancer risk. Conclusion: We investigated the causal link between statin therapy (atorvastatin, simvastatin, and rosuvastatin) and bladder cancer using a two-sample Mendelian Randomization analysis among the European population. Our findings indicated that genetically predicted use of rosuvastatin was associated with a decreased risk of bladder cancer, whereas no significant genetically predicted causal effects were observed for atorvastatin and simvastatin use.

Frequency and determinants of lipid management target achievement in primary prevention of cardiovascular disease in type 2 diabetes.

Aims: This study aimed to clarify the real-world status of lipid management in outpatients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) following the 2022 revision of the Japan Atherosclerosis Society Guidelines for Prevention of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Diseases. It also aimed to evaluate characteristics associated with the failure to achieve management targets. Materials and Methods: In this post-hoc analysis of a multicenter, cross-sectional study, we included Japanese outpatients with T2DM undergoing primary prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases (ASCVD) who provided fasting blood samples. The frequency and determinants of achieving low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C) targets were assessed. Results: Among 223 participants with a mean age of 67 and mean HbA1c of 7.1%, 61 had no history of peripheral arterial disease, microvascular complications, or smoking. Out of the 223 participants, 64.1% (95% CI: 57.6-70.1%) achieved the LDL-C target. In multivariate logistic regression analysis, being female (odds ratio [OR] 3.139, P = 0.0011), having diabetic nephropathy (OR 2.868, P = 0.0021), smoking (OR 2.292, P = 0.0281), and non-use of statins (OR 4.857, P < 0.0001) were independently associated with non-achievement. For non-HDL-C, 65.6% (95% CI: 58.1%-70.6%) of patients met the target. Having diabetic neuropathy (OR 2.428, P = 0.0054), smoking (OR 2.008, P = 0.0478), and non-use of statins (OR 2.277, P = 0.0112) were identified as factors associated with non-achievement. Conclusions: Low achievement rate of revised lipid management targets for ASCVD primary prevention in T2DM was unveiled. Assessing comorbidities, encouraging smoking cessation, and prioritizing statin use are considered.

Association between statin intensity and femoropopliteal stent primary patency in peripheral arterial disease.

BACKGROUND: Statins are widely used in coronary and peripheral arterial disease, but their impact on patency of stents placed for peripheral arterial disease is not well-studied. The purpose of this study was to evaluate femoropopliteal stent primary patency according to statin intensity at the time of stent placement and compare this effect to other covariates that may influence stent patency. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review identified 278 discrete femoropopliteal stent constructs placed in 216 patients over a 10-year period; Rutherford categories were 2 (3.6%), 3 (12.9%), 4 (21.2%), 5 (49.6%), and 6 (12.6%). Stent locations were common femoral (1.8%), common femoral/superficial femoral (0.7%), superficial femoral (50.7%), superficial femoral/popliteal (32.7%) and popliteal (14.0%) arteries; 63.3% of stents were paclitaxel-eluting. Primary patency of each stent construct was determined with duplex ultrasound, angiography, or computed tomographic angiography. Greater than 50% restenosis or stent occlusion was considered loss of patency. Cox proportional hazard and Kaplan-Meier modeling were used to assess the effect of statin use and additional covariates on stent patency. RESULTS: Patients on any statin at the time of stent placement were half as likely to undergo loss of primary unassisted patency as patients on no statin therapy (hazard ratio, 0.53; 95% confidence interval, 0.19-0.87; P = .004). Moderate/high intensity statin therapy conferred 17 additional months of median stent patency compared to the no statin group. Antiplatelet therapy, anticoagulant therapy, drug-eluting stents (versus bare metal or covered stents), and Rutherford class were not predictive of stent patency (P = 0.52, 0.85, 0.58, and 0.82, respectively). CONCLUSION: Use of statin therapy at the time of femoropopliteal stent placement was the most predictive examined variable influencing primary unassisted patency.

Study Design and Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial to Assess Long-Term Efficacy and Safety of a Triple Combination of Ezetimibe, Fenofibrate, and Moderate- Intensity Statin in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes and Modifiable Cardiovascular Risk Factors (ENSEMBLE).

Background: Atherogenic dyslipidemia, which is frequently associated with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and insulin resistance, contributes to the development of vascular complications. Statin therapy is the primary approach to dyslipidemia management in T2D, however, the role of non-statin therapy remains unclear. Ezetimibe reduces cholesterol burden by inhibiting intestinal cholesterol absorption. Fibrates lower triglyceride levels and increase high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) levels via peroxisome proliferator- activated receptor alpha agonism. Therefore, when combined, these drugs effectively lower non-HDL-C levels. Despite this, few clinical trials have specifically targeted non-HDL-C, and the efficacy of triple combination therapies, including statins, ezetimibe, and fibrates, has yet to be determined. Methods: This is a multicenter, prospective, randomized, open-label, active-comparator controlled trial involving 3,958 eligible participants with T2D, cardiovascular risk factors, and elevated non-HDL-C (≥100 mg/dL). Participants, already on moderate-intensity statins, will be randomly assigned to either Ezefeno (ezetimibe/fenofibrate) addition or statin dose-escalation. The primary end point is the development of a composite of major adverse cardiovascular and diabetic microvascular events over 48 months. Conclusion: This trial aims to assess whether combining statins, ezetimibe, and fenofibrate is as effective as, or possibly superior to, statin monotherapy intensification in lowering cardiovascular and microvascular disease risk for patients with T2D. This could propose a novel therapeutic approach for managing dyslipidemia in T2D.

Statin use and development and progression of non-alcohol fatty liver disease based on ultrasonography: a cohort study.

INTRODUCTION: Non-alcohol fatty liver disease (NAFLD) has emerged as a public health issue, while no drugs have been specifically approved for treatment. This study aimed to examine the association between statin use and NAFLD occurrence, progression, and regression. METHODS: A cohort study was designed based on the Kailuan Study and electronic medical records (EMRs) from the Kailuan General Hospital. Participants aged 18 years with statin indication, including statin and non-statin users, were enrolled in 2010-2017. Propensity score-matched cohorts were also used. RESULTS: In the entire cohort, 21 229 non-NAFLD and 22 419 NAFLD patients (including 12 818 mild NAFLD) were included in the final analysis. After a median follow-up of about four years, the incidence of NAFLD occurrence and progression for statin users were lower than those for non-statin users (occurrence: 84.7 vs. 106.5/1000 person-years; progression: 60.7 vs. 75.5/1000 person-years). Compared with non-statin users, the risk of NAFLD occurrence (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.78, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.70-0.87) and regression (HR [95%CI], 0.71[0.60-0.84]) was decreased in statin users. The significantly negative association was only observed in those with cumulative statin duration ≥ 2 years (HR [95%CI] for occurrence 0.56 [0.46-0.69] vs. 0.52 [0.30-0.90] for progression) and those with low or moderate ASCVD-risk (HR [95%CI] for occurrence 0.74 [0.66-0.82] vs. 0.68 [0.57-0.80] for progression). No significant correlation was observed between statin use, statin use duration, and NAFLD regression. The PS-matched cohort had similar results. CONCLUSION: Taking statin may decrease the risk of NAFLD occurrence and progression in the population with statin indication, suggesting the potential role of statin in both primary and secondary prevention strategies for NAFLD, especially among those with low or moderate ASCVD risk.

Risk of cardiovascular outcomes with bempedoic acid in high-risk statin intolerant patients: a systematic review and meta analysis.

Aim: Statin intolerance and myopathy is a major issue with prolonged use of statins myopathy. Bempedoic acid can be a good alternative for those intolerant to statins. This systematic review aims to observe incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and other adverse events, in high-risk statin intolerant patients receiving bempedoic acid. Methods: Literature search was conducted via Google Scholar, Science Direct and PubMed, after which screening, selection and data extraction of articles was done. Meta-analysis was performed on RevMan 5.4. Subgroup analysis was also conducted and heterogeneity was evaluated. Risk of bias was performed using ROB2 assessment scale. (CRD42024536827). Results: Only six randomized controlled trials were used in final analysis consisting of 17,844 patients. Treatment with bempedoic acid was associated with a reduced risk of MACE compared with placebo (RR 0.86; 95% CI [0.79, 0.94] p = 0.0005), with myocardial infarction significantly reduced. Incidence of adverse effects was increased with bempedoic acid (RR: 1.02; 95% [1.00, 1.03] p = 0.01) but no significant difference was observed. Incidence of myalgia was reduced in bempedoic group as well. Conclusion: Bempedoic acid is a safe and effective alternative to statins in high-risk patients intolerant to statins, decreasing the risk of MACE.

What is this summary about? Low density lipoprotein (LDL-C) also known as 'bad cholesterol', is the culprit behind many heart diseases. Statins are first-line treatment to reduce LDL-C. Despite being extremely effective, some people are intolerant and experience side effects such as sleep disorders, intestinal diseases and most commonly, effects on muscles ranging from muscle pain to breakdown of muscles leading to kidney damage. Bempedoic acid is a once-a-day medication, increasing LDL-C clearance from blood, reducing the risk of heart attack and diabetes and is effective for patients intolerant to statins. This article provides insights into incidences of major heart-related, and other adverse events in patients receiving bempedoic acid.What were the results? Muscle pain and major heart-related events were reduced (especially heart attack) in patients receiving bempedoic acid as compared with those receiving placebos. Muscle weakness and other adverse events were seen in patients receiving bempedoic acid, but serious adverse events were not significantly different from those receiving placebos.What do the results mean? Bempedoic acid is a safe and effective treatment that can be given to patients who cannot tolerate statins or develop side effects to it, as it reduces the risk of heart-related adverse events.

Muscular toxicity of colchicine combined with statins: a real-world study based on the FDA adverse event reporting system database from 2004-2023.

Background: Through an analysis of the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS), we explored the signal strength of adverse reactions (ADRs) related to myopathy caused by the combination of colchicine and statins and gained insight into the characteristics of these myopathy related ADRs. Methods: We extracted data from the FAERS database about ADRs in individuals with myopathy resulting from the combination of colchicine and statins. The analysis was conducted for the period spanning from January 2004 to December 2023 using the reported odds ratio (ROR) and information component (IC) methods to assess muscle-related ADR signals. Results: A total of 18,386 reports of statin myopathy-associated adverse reactions, 348 colchicine myopathy-associated adverse reactions, and 461 muscle-associated adverse reactions due to the combination of the two were collected; the strongest signals of statin myotoxicity events were for necrotizing myositis (ROR 50.47, 95% CL 41.74-61.01; IC 3.70 95% CL 3.25-4.08); the strongest signal for colchicine myotoxicity events was toxic myopathy (ROR 32.50, 95% CL 19.74-53.51; IC 4.97 95% CL 1.89-5.10), and the strongest signal for statins combined with colchicine was toxic myopathy (ROR 159.85, 95% CL 111.60-228.98; IC 7.22 95% CL 3.59-5.9); muscle-related adverse reactions signals were meaningful when the two drugs were combined in the order of colchicine combined with fluvastatin (ROR 187.38, 95% CL 96.68-363.17; IC 6.99 95% CL 1.65-5.68); colchicine combined with simvastatin in 135 cases (ROR 30.08. 95% CL 25.25-35.85; IC 4.80 95% CL 3.96-5.12); and colchicine combined with rosuvastatin (ROR 25.73, 95% CL 20.16-32.83; IC 4.59 95% CL 3.38-4.98) versus colchicine combined with atorvastatin (ROR 25.73, 95% CL 22.33-29.66; IC 4.59 95% CL 3.97-4.91) with almost identical signal intensity, followed by colchicine combined with pravastatin (ROR 13.67, 95% CL 9.17-20.37; IC 3.73 95% CL 1.87-4.47), whereas no signals were generated for lovastatin or pitavastatin. Conclusion: Similar ADRs can occur when colchicine and statins are used individually or in combination; however, the strength of these reactions may differ. To minimize the risk of drug interactions, statins with less potential interactions, such as lovastatin, pitavastatin, and pravastatin, should be chosen, and myopathy-related indices and symptoms should be closely monitored during use.

Worsening of myasthenic symptoms associated with statins.

INTRODUCTION/AIMS: The common presentations of statin intolerance are muscle-specific symptoms. Although statins are one type of drug reported to cause myasthenic worsening, myasthenic worsening has not been recognized as statin intolerance. The purpose of the present study is to investigate in a large cohort the safety profiles of statins in patients with myasthenia gravis (MG). METHODS: A total of 1710 consecutive patients with MG who visited sites associated with the Japan MG registry 2021 group between April and October 2021 were reviewed. Statin-associated myasthenic worsening was defined as worsening of any myasthenic symptoms on statin use and improvement of the symptom by stopping the statin or by undertaking additional treatment with patient and doctor confirmation. RESULTS: Among the 400 patients who used statins, 8 (2%) patients experienced statin intolerance and 6 (1.5%) patients experienced myasthenic worsening. No patients developed MG on the statin. Ptosis was a main symptom of myasthenic worsening in 4 (67%) patients. Atorvastatin was used in all patients with statin-associated myasthenic worsening. The symptoms of statin intolerance and statin-associated myasthenic worsening were improved within 2 months and 3 months, respectively, in all patients by cessation of statin use. DISCUSSION: Regarding statin-associated myasthenic worsening, prevalence was low, and severity was mild; with cessation of statin use, symptoms improved within a few months, and outcomes were generally good. Although statins can be used in MG patients with little concern, statin-associated myasthenic worsening should be noted in addition to the classical statin intolerance associated with statin use.

Statin Therapy, Inflammation, and Outcomes in Patients Hospitalized for Covid-19: A Prospective Multicenter Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Statins are lipid-lowering agents with with anti-inflammatory effects. Data surrounding the benefits of statins in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) are conflicting. We sought to better understand the impact of statins in the context of Covid-19-related inflammation. METHODS: We leveraged the International Study of Inflammation in Covid-19, a prospective multicenter cohort of patients hospitalized for Covid-19 between February 2020 and October 2022. Participants underwent systematic assessment of biomarkers of inflammation. We used logistic regression modeling and inverse probability-of-treatment weighting (IPTW) to examine the association between prior statin use and the composite outcome of in-hospital death, need for mechanical ventilation, and need for renal replacement therapy. RESULTS: A total of 4,464 patients were included in the study, of whom 1,364 (27.5%) were taking a statin prior to admission. There were 1,061 primary outcome events, including 540 deaths, 854 mechanical ventilation and 313 renal replacement therapy. Amongst biomarkers of inflammation, statin use was associated solely with lower levels of soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR) after adjusting for known confounders. In multivariable logistic regression analysis, statin use was associated with lower odds of the composite outcome (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 0.63, 95%CI[0.53-0.76]) compared to patients not on statins. Findings were consistent with IPTW (aOR 0.92, 95%CI [0.89- 0.95]). The proportion of the effect of statin on the primary outcome mediated by suPAR was estimated at 31.5%. CONCLUSION: Prior-statin use is associated with improved outcomes and lower inflammation as measured by suPAR levels in patients hospitalized for Covid-19.

Off-target effects of statins: molecular mechanisms, side effects and the emerging role of kinases.

Statins are one of the most important classes of drugs. In this analytical review, we elucidate the intricate molecular mechanisms and toxicological rationale regarding both the on- (targeting 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase [HMGCR]) and off-target effects of statins. Statins interact with a number of membrane kinases, such as epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), erb-b2 receptor tyrosine kinase 2 (HER2) and MET proto-oncogene, receptor tyrosine kinase (MET), as well as cytosolic kinases, such as SRC proto-oncogene, non-receptor tyrosine kinase (Src) and show inhibitory activity at nanomolar concentrations. In addition, they interact with calcium ATPases and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor α (PPARα/NR1C1) at higher concentrations. Statins interact with mitochondrial complexes III and IV, and their inhibition of coenzyme Q10 synthesis also impairs the functioning of complexes I and II. Statins act as inhibitors of kinases, calcium ATPases and mitochondrial complexes, while activating PPARα. These off-target effects likely contribute to the side effects observed in patients undergoing statin therapy, including musculoskeletal symptoms and hepatic effects. Interestingly, some off-target effects of statins could also be the cause of favourable outcomes, relating to repurposing statins in conditions such as inflammatory disorders and cancer.

Different diabetogenic effect of statins according to intensity and dose in patients with acute myocardial infarction: a nationwide cohort study.

Statin is crucial for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) patients. However, the risk of new-onset diabetes mellitus (NODM) associated with statin is a concern. This study aimed to determine the incremental diabetogenic effects of statins according to their intensity and dose in AMI patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Among 13,104 patients enrolled in the Korea AMI Registry between 2011 and 2015, 6152 patients without diabetes mellitus (DM) who underwent PCI and received moderate-to-high-intensity atorvastatin and rosuvastatin were selected for the study. The endpoints were NODM and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), composite of all-cause mortality, recurrent MI, and revascularization up to 3 years. Among the participants, 3747 and 2405 received moderate- and high-intensity statins, respectively. The Kaplan-Meier curves demonstrated a higher incidence of NODM in patients with high-intensity statins than those with moderate-intensity. High-intensity statin was a significant predictor of NODM after adjusting for other co-variables (HR = 1.316, 95% CI 1.024-1.692; P < 0.032). Higher dose of rosuvastatin was associated with a higher cumulative incidence of NODM, but this dose-dependency was not apparent with atorvastatin. Cumulative incidence of MACE decreased dose-dependently only with atorvastatin. High-intensity statin was associated with a higher cumulative incidence of NODM in AMI patients, and this association was more evident in rosuvastatin. The different diabetogenic effects of the two statins provide supporting evidence for understanding the nuanced nature of statin treatment in relation to NODM.

Safety and Effectiveness of High-Intensity Statins Versus Low/Moderate-Intensity Statins Plus Ezetimibe in Patients With Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease for Reaching LDL-C Goals: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: It remains controversial whether adding ezetimibe to low/moderate-intensity statins has a more beneficial impact on the treatment efficacy and safety of patients with existing atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) compared to high-intensity statin regimens. HYPOTHESIS: A combination of low/moderate-intensity statins plus ezetimibe might be more effective and safer than high-intensity statin monotherapy. METHODS: We searched databases for randomized controlled trials comparing lipid profile alterations, drug-related adverse events, and MACE components between high-intensity statin monotherapy and low/moderate-intensity statin plus ezetimibe combination therapy. Pooled risk ratios (RR), mean differences (MD), and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were estimated using a random-effects model. RESULTS: Our comprehensive search resulted in 32 studies comprising 6162 patients treated with monotherapy against 5880 patients on combination therapy. Combination therapy was more effective in reducing low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels compared to monotherapy (MD = -6.6, 95% CI: -10.6 to -2.5); however, no significant differences were observed in other lipid parameters. Furthermore, the combination therapy group experienced a lower risk of myalgia (RR = 0.27, 95% CI: 0.13-0.57) and discontinuation due to adverse events (RR = 0.61, 95% CI: 0.51-0.74). The occurrence of MACE was similar between the two treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: Adding ezetimibe to low/moderate-intensity statins resulted in a greater reduction in LDL-C levels, a lower rate of myalgia, and less drug discontinuation compared to high-intensity statin monotherapy in patients with existing cardiovascular disease. However, according to our meta-analysis, the observed reduction in LDL-C levels in the combination group did not correlate with a reduction in MACE compared to the high-intensity statin group.

Strategies to Address Statin Medication Intolerance Among Patients at Risk of Cardiovascular Disease Identified Through Electronic Health Records: A Literature Review and Pooled Analysis.

Statins are a group of medications that lower lipid and are used for primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular diseases (CVD). Patients can either be partially (15%) or completely (5%) intolerant to statins. Symptoms of statin intolerance can include muscle aches (myalgia), weakness, cramps, myopathy, diabetes mellitus, and elevated creatine kinase levels. Decreasing statin intolerance also improves statin adherence, which in turn results in lower number of CVD events among patients. Studies on statin intolerance is often embedded within studies of statin adherence. However, relevant data can be obtained from digital health systems. This preliminary literature review looks at studies from the past 10 years to identify and determine the effectiveness of strategies to address statin intolerance. The NLA definition for statin intolerance was used in this review. The initial search results on EMBASE, PubMed, SCOPUS, and CINAHL showed 91 articles and applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria, four articles were used in this review and pooled analysis. The study patients were identified through electronic health records. The pooled analysis was done using the Metafor package in R, applying a random-effect model to estimate pooled effect size. The findings suggest that using fixed dose combination therapy and switching from a lipophilic statin to a hydrophilic statin, while correcting metabolic abnormalities, or initiating evolocumab alongside statin can address statin intolerance. The overall relative risk (RR) was 0.40 (95% CI, 0.09 to 1.70) with I2 90%, and the overall odds ratio (OR) was 0.11 (95% CI, 0.01 to 1.59) with I2 94%, suggesting that the interventions work well in addressing statin intolerance. Since statin intolerance is has a vast range of effects, further research works may be done on exploring the possibility of using digital health systems to identify and provide targeted interventions to patients.

Age and sex specific thresholds for risk stratification of cardiovascular disease and clinical decision making: prospective open cohort study.

Objective: To quantify the potential advantages of using 10 year risk prediction models for cardiovascular disease, in combination with risk thresholds specific to both age and sex, to identify individuals at high risk of cardiovascular disease for allocation of statin treatment. Design: Prospective open cohort study. Setting: Primary care data from the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink GOLD, linked with hospital admissions from Hospital Episode Statistics and national mortality records from the Office for National Statistics in England, 1 January 2006 to 31 May 2019. Participants: 1 046 736 individuals (aged 40-85 years) with no cardiovascular disease, diabetes, or a history of statin treatment at baseline using data from electronic health records. Main outcome measures: 10 year risk of cardiovascular disease, calculated with version 2 of the QRISK cardiovascular disease risk algorithm (QRISK2), with two main strategies to identify individuals at high risk: in strategy A, estimated risk was a fixed cut-off value of ≥10% (ie, as per the UK National Institute for Health and Care Excellence guidelines); in strategy B, estimated risk was ≥10% or ≥90th centile of age and sex specific risk distributions. Results: Compared with strategy A, strategy B stratified 20 241 (149.8%) more women aged ≤53 years and 9832 (150.2%) more men aged ≤47 years as having a high risk of cardiovascular disease; for all other ages the strategies were the same. Assuming that treatment with statins would be initiated in those identified as high risk, differences in the estimated gain in cardiovascular disease-free life years from statin treatment for strategy B versus strategy A were 0.14 and 0.16 years for women and men aged 40 years, respectively; among individuals aged 40-49 years, the numbers needed to treat to prevent one cardiovascular disease event for strategy B versus strategy A were 39 versus 21 in women and 19 versus 15 in men, respectively. Conclusions: This study quantified the potential gains in cardiovascular disease-free life years when implementing prevention strategies based on age and sex specific risk thresholds instead of a fixed risk threshold for allocation of statin treatment. Such gains should be weighed against the costs of treating more younger people with statins for longer.

Early and short-term use of proprotein convertase anti-subtilisin-kexin type 9 inhibitors on coronary plaque stability in acute coronary syndrome.

Aims: Proprotein convertase anti-subtilisin-kexin type 9 inhibitors (PCSK9Is) improve plaque volume and composition and reduce major adverse coronary events in chronic coronary artery disease. We evaluated the effects of the short-term use of PCSK9Is on coronary plaque stability in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) using optical coherence tomography (OCT). Methods and results: This is a multicentre, open-label randomized controlled trial. The enrolled 80 subjects met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 52 patients (age 60 ± 11 years, 38 men, 14 women) with ST-elevated ACS had undergone successful primary percutaneous coronary intervention with LDL-cholesterol (LDL-C) levels > 70 mg/dL while receiving high-intensity statins. Participants were randomly assigned to the PCSK9I group (evolocumab 420 mg for 3 months, n = 29) or the standard of care (SoC) group (n = 23). Optical coherence tomography was performed at baseline (BL) and 3 and 9 months after randomization to assess lipid-rich plaques in non-culprit lesions. The change in the minimum fibrous cap thickness (MFCT) from BL to 9 months was the primary endpoint. The percentage change in LDL-C levels from BL to 3 months was significantly greater in the PCSK9I group (-67.8 ± 21.5% in the PCSK9I group vs. -16.3 ± 21.8% in the SoC group; P < 0.0001), and the difference between the two groups disappeared from BL to 9 months (-20.0 ± 37.8% in the PCSK9I group vs. -6.7 ± 34.2% in the SoC group; P = 0.20). The changes in MFCT from BL to 9 months were significantly greater in the PCSK9I group, even after PCSK9I discontinuation {100 µm [interquartile range (IQR): 45-180 µm] vs. 50 µm [IQR: 0-110 µm]; P = 0.032}. Conclusion: Combination treatment with PCSK9Is and statins resulted in more marked plaque stabilization after ACS than SoC alone, and this effect persisted for 6 months after PCSK9I discontinuation. Registration: Adage-Joto study, UMIN ID No. 26516.

Statin therapy improves locomotor muscle microvascular reactivity in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.

Peripheral microvascular dysfunction has been documented in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), which may be related to elevated levels of inflammation and oxidative stress. Unfortunately, few strategies have been identified to effectively ameliorate this disease-related derangement. Thus, using a parallel, double-blind, placebo-controlled design, this study evaluated the efficacy of 30-day atorvastatin administration (10mg QD) on lower limb microvascular reactivity, functional capacity, and biomarkers of inflammation and oxidative stress in patients with HFpEF (Statin: n=8, 76±6 yr; Placebo: n=8, 68±9 yr). The passive limb movement (PLM)-induced hyperemic response and 6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT) distance were evaluated to assess ambulatory muscle microvascular function and functional capacity, respectively. Circulating biomarkers were also measured to assess the contribution of changes in inflammation and redox balance to these outcomes. The total hyperemic response to PLM, assessed as leg blood flow area under-the-curve (LBFAUC), increased following the statin intervention (pre: 60 ± 68 mL; post: 164 ± 90 mL; P < 0.01), whereas these variables were unchanged in the placebo group (P=0.99). There were no significant differences in 6MWT distance following statin or placebo intervention. Malondialdehyde (MDA), a marker of lipid peroxidation, was significantly reduced following the statin intervention (pre: 0.68 ± 0.10; post: 0.51 ± 0.11; P < 0.01), while other circulating biomarkers were unchanged. Together, these data provide new evidence for the efficacy of low-dose statin administration to improve locomotor muscle microvascular reactivity in patients with HFpEF, which may be due, in part, to a diminution in oxidative stress.

Effect of rosuvastatin versus atorvastatin on new-onset diabetes mellitus in patients treated with high-intensity statin therapy for coronary artery disease: a post-hoc analysis from the LODESTAR randomized clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: The impact of rosuvastatin versus atorvastatin on new-onset diabetes mellitus (NODM) among patients treated with high-intensity statin therapy for coronary artery disease (CAD) remains to be clarified. This study aimed to evaluate the risk of NODM in patients with CAD treated with rosuvastatin compared to atorvastatin in the randomized LODESTAR trial. METHODS: In the LODESTAR trial, patients with CAD were randomly assigned to receive either rosuvastatin or atorvastatin using a 2-by-2 factorial randomization. In this post-hoc analysis, the 3-year incidence of NODM was compared between rosuvastatin and atorvastatin treatment in the as-treated population with high-intensity statin therapy as the principal population of interest. RESULTS: Among 2932 patients without diabetes mellitus at baseline, 2377 were included in the as-treated population analysis. In the as-treated population with high-intensity statin therapy, the incidence of NODM was not significantly different between the rosuvastatin and atorvastatin groups (11.4% [106/948] versus 8.8% [73/856], hazard ratio [HR] = 1.32, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.98 to 1.77, P = 0.071). When the risk of NODM with rosuvastatin versus atorvastatin was assessed according to the achieved low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) level, the risk of NODM began to increase at a LDL-C level below 70 mg/dL. The incidence of NODM was significantly greater in the rosuvastatin group than it was in the atorvastatin group when the achieved LDL-C level was < 70 mg/dL (13.9% versus 8.0%; HR = 1.79, 95% CI 1.18 to 2.73, P = 0.007). CONCLUSIONS: Among CAD patients receiving high-intensity statin therapy, the incidence of NODM was not significantly different between rosuvastatin and atorvastatin. However, a drug effect of the statin type on NODM was observed when the achieved LDL-C level was < 70 mg/dL. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, Identifier: NCT02579499.